Cholecystokinin octapeptide activates an opioid mechanism in the guinea-pig ileum: a possible role for substance P

Genetic and Non-genetic Factors Associated With Constipation in Cancer Patients Receiving Opioids

Objectives:

To examine whether the inter-individual variation in constipation among patients receiving opioids for cancer pain is associated with genetic or non-genetic factors.

Methods:

Cancer patients receiving opioids were included from 17 centers in 11 European countries. Intensity of constipation was reported by 1,568 patients on a four-point categorical scale. Non-genetic factors were included as covariates in stratified regression analyses on the association between constipation and 75 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 15 candidate genes related to opioid- or constipation-signaling pathways (HTR3E, HTR4, HTR2A, TPH1, ADRA2A, CHRM3, TACR1, CCKAR, KIT, ARRB2, GHRL, ABCB1, COMT, OPRM1, and OPRD1).

Results:

The non-genetic factors significantly associated with constipation were type of laxative, mobility and place of care among patients receiving laxatives (N=806), in addition to Karnofsky performance status and presence of metastases among patients not receiving laxatives (N=762) (P<0.01). Age, gender, body mass index, cancer diagnosis, time on opioids, opioid dose, and type of opioid did not contribute to the inter-individual differences in constipation. Five SNPs, rs1800532 in TPH1, rs1799971 in OPRM1, rs4437575 in ABCB1, rs10802789 in CHRM3, and rs2020917 in COMT were associated with constipation (P<0.01). Only rs2020917 in COMT passed the Benjamini–Hochberg criterion for a 10% false discovery rate.

Conclusions:

Type of laxative, mobility, hospitalization, Karnofsky performance status, presence of metastases, and five SNPs within TPH1, OPRM1, ABCB1, CHRM3, and COMT may contribute to the variability in constipation among cancer patients treated with opioids. Knowledge of these factors may help to develop new therapies and to identify patients needing a more individualized approach to treatment.

The NOP receptor involvement in both withdrawal- and CCk-8-induced contracture responses of guinea pig isolated ileum after acute activation of κ-opioid receptor

In isolated guinea-pig ileum (GPI), the κ-opioid acute withdrawal response is under the control of several neuronal signaling systems, including the μ-opioid, the A(1)-adenosine and the CB(1) receptors, which are involved in the inhibitory control of the κ-withdrawal response. After κ-opioid system stimulation, indirect activation of μ-opioid, A(1)-adenosine and CB(1) systems is prevented by the peptide cholecystokinin-8 (CCk-8). In the present study, we have investigated whether the NOP system is also involved in the regulation of the acute κ-withdrawal response. Interestingly, we found that in GPI preparation, the NOP system is not indirectly activated by the κ-opioid receptor stimulation, but instead this system is able by itself to directly regulate the acute κ-withdrawal response. Specifically, our results clearly highlight first the existence of an endogenous tone of the NOP system in GPI, and second that it behaves as a functional anti-opioid system. We also found that, the NOP receptor system is involved in the regulation of the CCk-8-induced contracture intensity, only when in the presence of the κ-opioid receptor stimulation. This effect seems to be regulated by an activation threshold mechanism. In conclusion, the NOP system could act as neuromodulatory system, whose action is strictly related to the modulation of both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters released in GPI enteric nervous system.

Biphasic regulation of the acute μ-withdrawal and CCk-8 contracture responses by the ORL-1 system in guinea pig ileum

The cloning of the opioid-receptor-like receptor (ORL-1) and the identification of the orphaninFQ/nociceptin (OFQ/N) as its endogenous agonist has revealed a new G-protein-coupled receptor signalling system. The structural and functional homology of ORL-1 to the opioid receptor systems has posed a number of challenges in the understanding the often competing physiological responses elicited by these G-protein-coupled receptors. We had previously shown that in guinea pig ileum (GPI), the acute μ-withdrawal response is under the inhibitory control of several systems. Specifically, we found that the exposure to a μ-opioid receptor agonist activates indirectly the κ-opioid, the A(1)-adenosine and the cannabinoid CB(1) systems, that in turn inhibit the withdrawal response. The indirect activation of these systems is prevented by the peptide cholecystokinin-8 (CCk-8). In the present study, we have investigated whether the ORL-1 system is also involved in the regulation of the acute μ-withdrawal response. Interestingly, we found that in GPI preparation, the ORL-1 system is not indirectly activated by the μ-opioid receptor stimulation, but instead the system is able by itself to directly regulate the acute μ-withdrawal response. Moreover, we have demonstrated that the ORL-1 system behaves both as anti-opioid or opioid-like system based on the level of activation. The same behaviour has also been observed in presence of CCk-8. Furthermore, in GPI, the existence of an endogenous tone of the ORL-1 system has been demonstrated. We concluded that the ORL-1 system acts as a neuromodulatory system, whose action is strictly related to the modulation of excitatory neurotrasmitters released in GPI enteric nervous system.

Opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction

Use of opioid analgesics is associated with a number of side effects, especially opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction. The extensive use of these compounds and the significant negative impact of the resulting gastrointestinal dysfunction on patients' quality of life make it an important clinical issue. In recent years our understanding of the mechanisms of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction has advanced greatly. This article reviews the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of specific gastrointestinal adverse effects of opioids. The role of endogenous opioid peptides in certain gastrointestinal diseases is also discussed. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction should lead to the development of newer opioid analgesics and improved regimens resulting in reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects.

Tachykinins in the gut. Part I. Expression, release and motor function

The preprotachykinin-A gene-derived peptides substance P and neurokinin (NK) A are expressed in distinct neural pathways of the mammalian gut. When released from intrinsic enteric or extrinsic primary afferent neurons, tachykinins have the potential to influence both nerve and muscle by way of interaction with three different types of tachykinin receptor, termed NK1, NK2 and NK3 receptors. Most prominent among the effects of tachykinins is their excitatory action on gastrointestinal motor activity, which is seen in virtually all regions and layers of the mammalian gut. This action depends not only on a direct activation of the muscle through NK1 and/or NK2 receptors, but also on stimulation of excitatory enteric motor pathways through NK3 and/or NK1 receptors. In addition, tachykinins can inhibit motor activity by stimulating either inhibitory neuronal pathways or interrupting excitatory relays. A synopsis of the available data indicates that endogenous substance P and NKA interact with other enteric transmitters in the physiological control of gastrointestinal motor activity. Derangement of the regulatory roles of tachykinins may be a factor in the gastrointestinal dysmotility associated with infection, inflammation, stress and pain. In a therapeutic perspective, it would seem conceivable, therefore, that tachykinin agonists and antagonists are adjuncts to the treatment of motor disorders that involve pathological disturbances of the gastrointestinal tachykinin system.

Opioid and anti-opioid peptides

The numerous endogenous opioid peptides (beta-endorphin, enkephalins, dynorphins ... ) and the exogenous opioids (such as morphine) exert their effects through the activation of receptors belonging to four main types, mu, delta, kappa and epsilon. Opioidergic neurones and opioid receptors are largely distributed centrally and peripherally. It is thus not surprising that opioids have numerous pharmacological effects and that endogenous opioids are thought to be involved in the physiological control of various functions, among which nociception is particularly emphasized. Some opioid targets may be components of homeostatic systems tending to reduce the effects of opioids. "Anti-opioid" properties have been attributed to various peptides, especially cholecystokinin (CCK), neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and melanocyte inhibiting factor (MIF)-related peptides. In addition, a particular place should be attributed, paradoxically, to opioid peptides themselves among the anti-opioid peptides. These peptides can oppose some of the acute effects of opioids, and a hyperactivation of anti-opioid peptidergic neurones due to the chronic administration of opioids may be involved in the development of opioid tolerance and/or dependence. In fact, CCK, NPFF and the MIF family of peptides have complex properties and can act as opioid-like as well as anti-opioid peptides. Thus, "opioid modulating peptides" would be a better term to designate these peptides, which probably participate, together with the opioid systems, in multiple feed-back loops for the maintenance of homeostasis. "Opioid modulating peptides" have generally been shown to act through the activation of their own receptors. For example, CCK appears to exert its anti-opioid actions mainly through the activation of CCK-B receptors, whereas its opioid-like effects seem to result from the stimulation of CCK-A receptors. However, the partial agonistic properties at opioid receptors of some MIF-related peptides very likely contribute to their ability to modulate the effects of opioids. CCK- and NPFF-related drugs have potential therapeutic interest as adjuncts to opioids for alleviating pain and/or for the treatment of opioid abuse.

Central and peripheral control of postprandial pyloric motility by endogenous opiates and cholecystokinin in dogs

The role of endogenous opiates and cholecystokinin (CCK) in the control of postprandial pyloric myoelectric activity was investigated in conscious dogs with chronically implanted intraparietal electrodes at the gastroduodenal junction. Meals consisted of either 20 g/kg of canned food (standard meal) or the same food supplemented with 0.5 mL/kg of arachis oil (fat meal). During the 6 hours after standard and fat meals, the number of pyloric spike bursts, 2-4 seconds in duration, was 61.8 +/- 15.8 and 49.9 +/- 12.7/15 minutes, respectively. Administered 15 minutes before a fat meal, naloxone (50 micrograms/kg IV) decreased the number of spike bursts by 31.4%, whereas methyl-levallorphan, a peripheral opiate antagonist, increased postprandial spike activity by 22.2% when administered IV (0.5 mg/kg) and decreased it when administered intracerobroventricularly at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg. These two antagonists administered in the same conditions before a standard meal had no effect on the postprandial spike activity. A 1-hour infusion of cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8), 500 ng.kg-1.h-1 IV and 50 ng.kg-1.h-1 intracerebroventricularly, performed 1 hour after a standard meal induced a 19.6% and 15.8% decrease in the number of pyloric spike bursts, respectively. Both naloxone IV (50 micrograms/kg) and methyl-levallorphan intracerebroventricularly (10 micrograms/kg) administered before the infusion of CCK-8 reinforced this pyloric inhibition, which was antagonized by methyl-levallorphan IV (0.5 mg/kg). The CCK antagonist asperlicin, 200 micrograms/kg IV and 20 micrograms/kg intracerebroventricularly, administered before a fat meal increased pyloric spike bursts by 22.0% and 31.5%, respectively. These results indicate that after a fat meal, endogenous opiates exert a peripheral inhibitory and central stimulatory control of pyloric motility; they suggest the involvement of both peripheral and central release of CCK.

The current status of opioid research on gastrointestinal motility

Apparently conflicting data on opioid effects on gastrointestinal motility have been reported in the literature. The current status is reviewed and an attempt is made to find a common denominator to discrepant results by suggesting functionally contrasting opioid systems modulating the same physiological functions. Upon superimposition, these contrasting systems might result in opposite opioid effects dependent on the actual functional balance between the systems at the time of drug administration. Inhibitory neuromodulation at multiple sites leading to either inhibition or disinhibition by opioids may serve as a common basis of their contrasting effects. This interpretation, though consistent with most of the currently available data, is still a working hypothesis.

Novel autonomic neurotransmitters and intestinal function

A wide variety of substances, including amines and peptides, have been detected within the complex neuronal pathways of the enteric nervous system using immunohistochemical techniques. In this article we have discussed some of the more recent data on the effects of these substances on intestinal activity. We have also commented on the many difficulties associated with ascribing neurotransmitter status to individual compounds. The technique of immunoblockade of neurogenic functional responses has been used in an attempt to identify some of the putative neurotransmitter substances. The search for selective antagonists continues.