Characterization of muscarinic receptors mediating vasodilation in guinea-pig ileum submucosal arterioles by the use of computer-assisted videomicroscopy

Localization of muscarinic receptors M1R, M2R and M3R in the human colon

BACKGROUND

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (MR) are involved in multiple intestinal reflexes. The cellular localization of subtypes of MRs within enteric circuits mediating muscle and mucosal reflexes remains to be demonstrated. This study aimed to localize the three functionally significant subtypes of MRs in human colon.

METHODS

Reverse transcriptase-PCR was used to determine expression levels of muscarinic receptor subtype (MRs) M1Rs, M2Rs and M3Rs in human colon. Indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy was used to localize MRs in cryostat-cut sections of human colon. Sections were double labeled for multiple cellular and neurochemical markers. Western blotting was used to confirm specificity of the muscarinic antisera used.

KEY RESULTS

All three MR subtypes were expressed in human colon. Immunoreactivity (IR) for M2Rs and M3Rs was most abundant in circular and longitudinal muscle. M1R-IR was most abundant on myenteric and submucosal nerve cells, both cholinergic and nitrergic. M3R-IR was also present on populations on myenteric nerve cell bodies. Immunoreactivity for all three receptors was present on nerve fibers in the circular muscle.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In the human colon, subtypes of MRs were present on multiple cell types within the enteric circuits underlying motility, secretory and vasoactive reflexes. The cellular distribution for MRs found in this study agrees with data from functional studies, providing insight into the role MRs have in mediating enteric cholinergic neurotransmission.

Immunohistochemical localisation of cholinergic muscarinic receptor subtype 1 (M1r) in the guinea pig and human enteric nervous system

Little is known regarding the location of cholinergic muscarinic receptor 1 (M1r) in the ENS, even though physiological data suggest that M1rs are central to cholinergic neurotransmission. This study localised M1rs in the ENS of the guinea pig ileum and human colon using fluorescence immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR in human colon. Double labelling using antibodies against neurochemical markers was used to identify neuron subytpes bearing M1r. M1r immunoreactivity (IR) was present on neurons in the myenteric and submucosal ganglia. The two antibodies gave similar M1r-IR patterns and M1r-IR was abolished upon antibody preabsorption. M1r-IR was present on cholinergic and nNOS-IR nerve cell bodies in both guinea pig and human myenteric neurons. Presynaptic M1r-IR was present on NOS-IR and VAChT-IR nerve fibres in the circular muscle in the human colon. In the submucosal ganglia, M1r-IR was present on a population of neurons that contained cChAT-IR, but did not contain NPY-IR or calretinin-IR. M1r-IR was present on endothelial cells of blood vessels in the submucosal plexus. The localisation of M1r-IR in the guinea pig and human ENS shown in this study agrees with physiological studies. M1r-IR in cholinergic and nitrergic neurons and nerve fibres indicate that M1rs have a role in both cholinergic and nitrergic transmission. M1r-IR present in submucosal neurons suggests a role in mediating acetylcholine's effect on submucosal sensory and secretomotor/vasodilator neurons. M1r-IR present on blood vessel endothelial cells suggests that M1rs may also mediate acetylcholine's direct effect on vasoactivation.

Vasodilatory effects of cholinergic agonists are greatly diminished in aorta from M3R-/- mice

Acetylcholine interacts with endothelial muscarinic receptors to enhance nitric oxide (NO) release and thereby cause vasodilation. The present study was designed to determine if this effect of acetylcholine is mediated by muscarinic M3 receptors. Thoracic aortae were isolated from wild-type (WT) and M3 receptor knock out (M3R-/-) male mice, and endothelium-intact (I) and -denuded (D) aortic rings were bathed in physiological buffer. Preparations were utilized to examine the contractile response to phenylephrine (1 x 10(-8) - 3 x 10(-4) M added cumulatively) and the vasodilatory actions of acetylcholine (10(-8) - 10(-4) M), carbachol (10(-9) - 10(-4) M), ATP (3 x 10(-5) M) and the NO donor SIN-1 (10(-4) M), each added in the presence of phenylephrine. Endothelium-dependent vasodilatory effects of acetylcholine and carbachol were obvious in aortae isolated from WT mice (56.3 +/- 9.8% and 49.1 +/- 4.1% reductions, respectively, in phenylephrine-induced contraction; p < 0.05), while acetylcholine and carbachol-associated relaxations observed in endothelium-intact M3R-/- preparations (17.9 +/- 2.6% and 13.5 +/- 4.2% reductions, respectively) did not differ significantly from time-control values. ATP-induced, endothelium-dependent vasodilation was similar in preparations from M3R-/- and WT mice, and SIN-1 elicited similar dilatory effects in intact and denuded WT and M3R-/- segments. Phenylephrine concentration-response curves were shifted leftwards by removal of the endothelium in both groups (EC50 values: WT-I/D--25.59 +/- 6.86/3.13 +/- 1.01 x 10(-7) M; M3R-/-I/D--13.92 +/- 4.21/1.52 +/- 0.46 x 10(-7) M; both p < 0.05); however, the phenylephrine response did not differ significantly when compared between the WT and M3R-/- groups. These results indicate that the attenuated vasodilatory effect of acetylcholine in endothelium-intact aortae from M3R-/- mice is due to the absence of muscarinic M3 receptors, and thus suggest that in mouse aorta, muscarinic M3 receptors play a major role in the endothelium-dependent acetylcholine-induced vasodilation.

Ophidian envenomation strategies and the role of purines

Snake envenomation employs three well integrated strategies: prey immobilization via hypotension, prey immobilization via paralysis, and prey digestion. Purines (adenosine, guanosine and inosine) evidently play a central role in the envenomation strategies of most advanced snakes. Purines constitute the perfect multifunctional toxins, participating simultaneously in all three envenomation strategies. Because they are endogenous regulatory compounds in all vertebrates, it is impossible for any prey organism to develop resistance to them. Purine generation from endogenous precursors in the prey explains the presence of many hitherto unexplained enzyme activities in snake venoms: 5'-nucleotidase, endonucleases (including ribonuclease), phosphodiesterase, ATPase, ADPase, phosphomonoesterase, and NADase. Phospholipases A(2), cytotoxins, myotoxins, and heparinase also participate in purine liberation, in addition to their better known functions. Adenosine contributes to prey immobilization by activation of neuronal adenosine A(1) receptors, suppressing acetylcholine release from motor neurons and excitatory neurotransmitters from central sites. It also exacerbates venom-induced hypotension by activating A(2) receptors in the vasculature. Adenosine and inosine both activate mast cell A(3) receptors, liberating vasoactive substances and increasing vascular permeability. Guanosine probably contributes to hypotension, by augmenting vascular endothelial cGMP levels via an unknown mechanism. Novel functions are suggested for toxins that act upon blood coagulation factors, including nitric oxide production, using the prey's carboxypeptidases. Leucine aminopeptidase may link venom hemorrhagic metalloproteases and endogenous chymotrypsin-like proteases with venom L-amino acid oxidase (LAO), accelerating the latter. The primary function of LAO is probably to promote prey hypotension by activating soluble guanylate cyclase in the presence of superoxide dismutase. LAO's apoptotic activity, too slow to be relevant to prey capture, is undoubtedly secondary and probably serves principally a digestive function. It is concluded that the principal function of L-type Ca(2+) channel antagonists and muscarinic toxins, in Dendroaspis venoms, and acetylcholinesterase in other elapid venoms, is to promote hypotension. Venom dipeptidyl peptidase IV-like enzymes probably also contribute to hypotension by destroying vasoconstrictive peptides such as Peptide YY, neuropeptide Y and substance P. Purines apparently bind to other toxins which then serve as molecular chaperones to deposit the bound purines at specific subsets of purine receptors. The assignment of pharmacological activities such as transient neurotransmitter suppression, histamine release and antinociception, to a variety of proteinaceous toxins, is probably erroneous. Such effects are probably due instead to purines bound to these toxins, and/or to free venom purines.

Characterisation of muscarinic receptor subtypes in avian smooth muscle

The identity of the muscarinic receptor subtype in the chick ileum was investigated in functional and binding studies. Preliminary studies [Choo, L.-K., Mitchelson, F., Napier, P. 1988. J. Auton. Pharmacol. 8, 259-266] suggested apparent avian and mammalian family differences in the muscarinic receptor profile of ileal smooth muscle. In the current study, further characterisation was undertaken using a greater range of antagonists exhibiting high affinity for specific muscarinic receptor subtypes. Dissociation constants from functional and binding experiments were compared with published values for antagonists at each of the five muscarinic receptor subtypes. Linear regression and correlation analyses revealed the receptor initiating the contractile response was most likely of the muscarinic M(3) receptor subtype as the slope of the linear regression was 1.01+/-0.14 and the corresponding correlation coefficient (r) was 0.95. The mammalian muscarinic M(5) receptor subtype also showed a high correlation with the data giving a slope of 0.89+/-0.27 and r value of 0.76. These findings were in direct contrast to those from binding experiments in which the single binding site detected was of the muscarinic M(2) receptor subtype. The slope of the linear regression was 1.14+/-0.24 with an r value of 0.87. Thus, these results suggest that there exists a high proportion of the muscarinic M(2) receptor subtype within the tissue that does not contribute to the functional response.

Role of muscarinic cholinergic transmission in Edinger-Westphal nucleus-induced choroidal vasodilation in pigeon

Activation of the parasympathetic ciliary ganglion input to the choroid causes increases in choroidal blood flow. We examined the role and the type of muscarinic receptors within the choroid that are involved in these increases in choroidal blood flow, using electrical stimulation of the nucleus of Edinger-Westphal (EW) to activate the ciliary ganglion input to choroid in ketamine anesthetized pigeons. Baseline choroidal blood flow and its EW-evoked increases measured as peak and total (area under the curve) responses were determined using laser Doppler flowmetry. The EW-evoked responses were reduced dose-dependently after administration of 4-diphenyl-acetoxy-N-methylpiperedine (4-DAMP), a relatively selective antagonist of M3 type muscarinic receptors, with a maximal mean decrease of 86% (peak response) and 93% (total response) at a dose of 10 microg kg(-1)i.v. without a significant effect on baseline choroidal blood flow, heart rate or systemic arterial blood pressure. Atropine, a non-selective antagonist of muscarinic receptors, decreased the EW-evoked responses to a lesser extent than 4-DAMP after intravenous administration of 1 mg kg(-1)(by 67% for peak response and by 53% for total response) or topical administration of a 5% solution (by 41% for peak response and by 62% for total response), both of which increased heart rate and systemic arterial blood pressure without a consistent effect on baseline choroidal blood flow. In contrast, himbacine (i.p. 10 microg kg(-1)), a relatively selective antagonist of M2 type muscarinic receptors, increased the EW-evoked parasympathetic cholinergic vasodilation (by 93% for the peak response and by 142% for the total response) without a significant effect on heart rate, systemic arterial blood pressure or baseline choroidal blood flow. The results of our study suggest a major role of M3 type muscarinic receptors in the EW-evoked increases in choroidal blood flow. Based on findings that the ciliary ganglion input to choroid does not synthesize nitric oxide but inhibitors of NO production do block EW-evoked choroidal vasodilation, it seems likely that the M3 receptors acted on by 4-DAMP are present on choroidal endothelial cells and mediate choroidal vasodilation via stimulation of endothelial release of nitric oxide. In contrast, M2 muscarinic receptors may play a presynaptic role in downregulating EW-evoked parasympathetic cholinergic vasodilation in avian choroid.

Hypotensive effect of an M2-selective muscarinic antagonist in anaesthetized guinea-pigs

1. In order to determine an involvement of muscarinic M2 receptors in the regulation of systemic arterial blood pressure, we investigated the cardiovascular effects of the M2-selective antagonist methoctramine and other agents in anaesthetized guinea-pigs. 2. Intravenous injection of methoctramine, atropine, pirenzepine (an M1-selective muscarinic antagonist) or 4-DAMP (an M3-selective muscarinic antagonist) each significantly increased heart rate in comparison to vehicle controls. 3. Methoctramine produced significant, dose-dependent decreases in mean arterial blood pressure, with an ED50 of 0.1 mg kg-1. Atropine decreased blood pressure only at high doses. Pirenzepine and 4-DAMP did not alter blood pressure, indicating that M1 or M3 receptor antagonism was not responsible for the cardiovascular effects of methoctramine. 4. The hypotensive effect of methoctramine was unaltered by indomethacin pretreatment, ruling out an alteration in arachidonic acid metabolism as the mechanism of action. 5. In contrast to methoctramine, mecamylamine (a nicotinic ganglionic receptor antagonist) greatly decreased heart rate and slightly decreased blood pressure, suggesting that ganglionic blockade was not the mechanism for the cardiovascular effects of methoctramine. 6. Methoctramine (0.3 mg kg-1) pretreatment did not alter the hypertensive effect of intravenous noradrenaline, demonstrating that methoctramine did not directly inhibit vascular reactivity and indicating an indirect hypotensive of action of methoctramine. 7. In summary, the results suggest that the hypotensive action of methoctramine resulted from selective M2 receptor antagonism. Therefore, muscarinic M2 receptors appear to play a role in the regulation of systemic arterial blood pressure in guinea-pigs. However, the anatomical site(s) of action of methoctramine remains to be determined.

The M3 muscarinic receptor mediates acetylcholine-induced cortisol secretion from bovine adrenocortical zona fasciculata/reticularis cells

In order to characterize the receptor subtype mediating acetylcholine (ACh)-induced cortisol secretion from purified bovine adrenocortical zona fasciculata/reticularis cells in primary culture, the potencies of a range of selective muscarinic antagonists of ACh-induced steroidogenesis were assessed by Schild analysis. Basal secretion of cortisol was 10.2 +/- 1.4 pmol/well/30 min. ACh stimulated a dose-dependent increase in cortisol secretion and was maximally effective at 10(-5) M, at which concentration cortisol secretion was 143.4 +/- 12.9 pmol/well/30 min. Hexahydro-sila-difenidol and para-fluoro-hexa-hydro-sila-difenidol were potent competitive antagonists of ACh-stimulated cortisol secretion, with pA2 values of 8.68 +/- 0.28 and 7.96 +/- 0.29, respectively. Pirenzepine (pA2 = 6.95 +/- 0.28) and methoctramine (pA2 = 6.06 +/- 0.27) were relatively weak competitive antagonists. The pA2 values determined in this study are characteristic of the M3 muscarinic receptor, and we conclude that this receptor subtype mediates ACh-induced cortisol secretion from bovine zona fasciculata/reticularis cells.

Characterization of muscarinic receptors mediating vasodilation in rat perfused kidney

The muscarinic receptor mediating vasodilation of resistance vessels in the rat isolated, constant-pressure perfused kidney (preconstriction by 10(-7) M cirazoline) was characterized by subtype-preferring agonists and selective antagonists. The agonists produced vasodilation with the following rank order of potency: arecaidine propargyl ester (APE) > 5-methylfurtrethonium = methacholine = oxotremorine > (S)-aceclidine > arecaidine 2-butyne-1,4-diyl bisester > 4-Cl-McN-A-343 = (R)-nipecotic acid ethyl ester = N-ethyl-guvacine propargyl ester approximately (R)-aceclidine = (S)-nipecotic acid ethyl ester > McN-A-343. Agonist-induced vasodilation disappeared after destruction of the endothelium with detergent. Highly significant correlations of agonist potencies for vasodilation were found between rat kidney and guinea-pig ileum submucosal arterioles as well as agonist potencies at smooth muscle muscarinic M3 receptors of the guinea-pig ileum. The rank order of antagonist potencies (4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP) > (R)-hexahydro-difenidol approximately hexahydro-sila-difenidol > pirenzepine approximately p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol approximately himbacine approximately AF-DX 384 approximately AQ-RA 741 > (S)-hexahydro-difenidol) to attenuate vasodilation to APE in rat kidney, correlated significantly with affinities at M3 receptors in submucosal arterioles and in smooth muscle of the guinea-pig ileum, but differed from those at M1 and M2 receptors in rabbit vas deferens. The agonist and antagonist potencies suggest that vasodilation elicited by muscarinic stimuli in endothelium-intact rat renal vasculature is mediated by functional muscarinic M3 receptors.

Muscarinic receptors--characterization, coupling and function

At least five muscarinic receptor genes have been cloned and expressed. Muscarinic receptors act via activation of G proteins: m1, m3 and m5 muscarinic receptors couple to stimulate phospholipase C, while m2 and m4 muscarinic receptors inhibit adenylyl cyclase. This review describes the localization, pharmacology and function of the five muscarinic receptor subtypes. The actions of muscarinic receptors on the heart, smooth muscle, glands and on neurons (both presynaptic and postsynaptic) in the autonomic nervous system and the central nervous system are analyzed in terms of subtypes, biochemical mechanisms and effects on ion channels, including K+ channels and Ca2+ channels.

Histamine H1 receptors mediate vasodilation in guinea-pig ileum resistance vessels: characterization with computer-assisted videomicroscopy and new selective agonists

Histamine receptors on guinea-pig ileum submucosal arterioles (outside diameter 40-80 microns) were studied in vitro using a computer-assisted videomicroscopy system (Diamtrak). Histamine receptor agonists investigated in this study were histamine, the H1 receptor-selective compound, 2-[2-(3-fluorophenyl)-4-imidazolyl]ethanamine (VZ 20), the H2 receptor-selective compounds, dimaprit, impromidine, (+/-)-N1-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(pyridin-2-yl)propyl]- N2-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (arpromidine) and (+/-)-N1-[3-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-3-(pyridin-2-yl)propyl]- N2-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (BU-E-75), as well as the H3 receptor-selective drug, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine ((R)-alpha-MeHA). Applied to vessels at resting tone, the agonists (1 nM-300 microM) did not change arteriolar diameter. Vessels preconstricted by 10 microM noradrenaline showed similar concentration-dependent vasodilations with histamine and VZ 20 (pD2 = 5.38 and 5.36, respectively). This histamine-induced vasodilation was not affected by tetrodotoxin (0.5 microM) or indomethacin (1 microM), but was completely abolished in the presence of 1 microM of the H1 receptor antagonist, mepyramine. Calculation of the antagonist affinity of mepyramine for the histamine receptors in submucosal arterioles yielded a pA2 of 9.46. In contrast to histamine and VZ 20, the H2 receptor agonist, dimaprit, and the H3 receptor agonist, (R)-alpha-MeHA, were ineffective at preconstricted arterioles. The guanidine-type H2 receptor agonists, impromidine, apromidine and BU-E-75, produced vasodilation at noradrenaline-preconstricted arterioles (-log EC50 = 4.47, 5.30 and 5.39, respectively) but, in contrast to histamine, were ineffective at arterioles preconstricted by U-46619 (300 nM).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)