Naloxone causes apparent antinociception and pronociception simultaneously in the rat paw formalin test

Characterization of Nociceptive Behaviors Induced by Formalin in the Glabrous and Hairy Skin of Rats

Introduction:

Glabrous skin and hairy skin are innervated by different types of noxious fibers. However, the different nociceptive behaviors induced by formalin, a commonly used model of acute inflammatory pain, have not yet been systematically examined in the glabrous and hairy skin.

Methods:

In this study, we compared nociceptive behaviors induced by formalin injections (2%, 4%, and 8%) into either glabrous skin (plantar surface) of the hind paw or hairy skin of the hind limb in adult rats.

Results:

A typical biphasic nociceptive response was seen after formalin injection into the plantar surface of the hind paw. A brief interphase separates the first and second phases where nociceptive behaviors were barely spotted. However, following subcutaneous injection into the hairy skin nociceptive behaviors were only seen after 10 minutes of formalin injection, which correlates in time with the second phase of the formalin response. First phase nociceptive behaviors were never seen with hairy skin injection, even following multiple injections of formalin.

Conclusion:

These data suggest that nociceptive behaviors and spinal responses induced by formalin injections to glabrous and hairy skin areas are different, and that the first and second phases may be mediated through different noxious afferent fibers.

Antinociceptive Effect of Mirtazapine in Rats with Diabetic Neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the antinociceptive effect of mirtazapine and the mechanisms mediating this effect in neuropathic pain in rats with diabetes.

METHODS

The experiments were performed in Sprague Dawley rats using a hot-plate device. Streptozotocin (STZ) was administered to the rats after taking control measurements. Rats with a blood glucose level of 240 mg/dL or above in the blood specimen obtained from the tail vein 3 days after STZ administration were considered as being diabetic. Three weeks after STZ administration, the hot-plate test was performed. Compared with the control measurements, rats that exhibited >20% decrease in the second hot-plate test measurements were considered to have developed neuropathy. Drugs [mirtazapine, naloxone (opioidergic antagonist), metergoline (serotonergic antagonist), and BRL44408 (adrenergic antagonist)] and drug combinations were administered to those rats that developed neuropathy. After administrating the drugs or drug combinations, the third hot-plate test was performed.

RESULTS

Mirtazapine at doses of 10 and 15 mg/kg exhibited a significant antinociceptive effect. Naloxone, metergoline, or BRL44408 alone did not cause an antinociceptive effect. However, combinations of these drugs with mirtazapine (15 mg/kg) significantly decreased the antinociceptive effect of mirtazapine.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that mirtazapine has a significant antinociceptive effect in diabetic neuropathy and that opioidergic, serotonergic, and adrenergic systems have roles to play in this effect.

Antinociceptive properties of selective MT(2) melatonin receptor partial agonists

Melatonin is a neurohormone involved in the regulation of both acute and chronic pain whose mechanism is still not completely understood. We have recently demonstrated that selective MT2 melatonin receptor partial agonists have antiallodynic properties in animal models of chronic neuropathic pain by modulating ON/OFF cells of the descending antinociceptive system. Here, we examined the antinociceptive properties of the selective MT2 melatonin receptor partial agonists N-{2-[(3-methoxyphenyl)phenylamino]ethyl}acetamide (UCM765) and N-{2-[(3-bromophenyl)-(4-fluorophenyl)amino]ethyl}acetamide (UCM924) in two animal models of acute and inflammatory pain: the hot-plate and formalin tests. UCM765 and UCM924 (5-40 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently increased the temperature of the first hind paw lick in the hot-plate test, and decreased the total time spent licking the injected hind paw in the formalin test. Antinociceptive effects of UCM765 and UCM924 were maximal at the dose of 20mg/kg. At this dose, the effects of UCM765 and UCM924 were similar to those produced by 200 mg/kg acetaminophen in the hot-plate test, and by 3 mg/kg ketorolac or 150 mg/kg MLT in the formalin test. Notably, antinociceptive effects of the two MT2 partial agonists were blocked by the pre-treatment with the MT2 antagonist 4-phenyl-2-propionamidotetralin (4P-PDOT, 10 mg/kg) in both paradigms. These results demonstrate the antinociceptive properties of UCM765 and UCM924 in acute and inflammatory pain models and corroborate the concept that MT2 melatonin receptor may be a novel target for analgesic drug development.

Peripheral metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 contributes to inflammation-induced hypersensitivity of the rat temporomandibular joint

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) comprise an assortment of clinical conditions characterized by pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). TMD patients have a variety of symptoms, including jaw movement disorder and TMJ pain. Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) was reported to be involved in pain processing in several animal models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain. In this study, the head withdrawal threshold and mGluR5 expression were investigated in rats with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced TMJ inflammatory pain. CFA injection into the TMJ significantly decreased the mechanical head withdrawal thresholds relative to vehicle injection, and the effects were blocked by pre-injection of 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP). mGluR5 expression in the trigeminal ganglion was predominantly increased in the CFA-injected group compared with the normal control group. Pretreatment with MPEP, a selective mGluR5 antagonist, reduced mGluR5 expression in the trigeminal ganglion compared with the CFA group, as measured by immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and RT-PCR. Significant differences in the proportion or intensity of mGluR5 expression were found in animals with inflammation versus control animals at the examined time point. These findings indicate a role for peripheral mGluR5 in CFA-induced nociceptive behavior and TMJ inflammation. Peripheral application of mGluR5 antagonists could provide therapeutic benefits for inflammatory TMJ pain.

A series of D-amino acid oxidase inhibitors specifically prevents and reverses formalin-induced tonic pain in rats

We have found that mutation of D-amino acid oxidase (DAO) diminished formalin-induced tonic pain. The present research further studied the analgesic effects of a series of DAO inhibitors in this model. 5-Chlorobenzo[d]isoxazol-3-ol (CBIO), 4H-thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-5-carboxylic acid (compound 8), 5-methylpyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (AS057278), sodium benzoate, and 4-nitro-3-pyrazole carboxylic acid (NPCA) inhibited rat spinal cord-derived DAO activity in a concentration-dependent manner, with maximal inhibition of 100% and potency rank of CBIO > compound 8 > AS057278 > sodium benzoate > NPCA. In rats, intrathecal injections of CBIO, compound 8, AS057278, and sodium benzoate but not NPCA specifically prevented formalin-induced tonic pain but not acute nociception, with the same potency order as in the DAO activity assay. The highly potent analgesia of DAO inhibitors was evidenced by CBIO, which prevented 50% pain at 0.06 μg, approximately 5-fold the potency of morphine. CBIO given after formalin challenge also reversed the established pain state to the same degree as prevention. The antihyperalgesic potencies of these DAO inhibitors were highly correlated to their inhibitions of spinal DAO activity. Maximum inhibition of pain by these compounds was approximately 60%, comparable with that of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonist (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801), suggesting that a larger portion of formalin-induced tonic pain is "DAO-sensitive," whereas the remaining 40% of tonic pain and acute nociception is "DAO-insensitive." These findings, combined with our previous DAO gene mutation and induction results, indicate spinal DAO mediates both induction and maintenance of formalin-induced tonic pain and further validate spinal DAO as a novel and efficacious target molecule for the treatment of chronic pain.

Evidence for a role of NTS2 receptors in the modulation of tonic pain sensitivity

BACKGROUND

Central neurotensin (NT) administration results in a naloxone-insensitive antinociceptive response in animal models of acute and persistent pain. Both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors were shown to be required for different aspects of NT-induced analgesia. We recently demonstrated that NTS2 receptors were extensively associated with ascending nociceptive pathways, both at the level of the dorsal root ganglia and of the spinal dorsal horn. Then, we found that spinally administered NTS2-selective agonists induced dose-dependent antinociceptive responses in the acute tail-flick test. In the present study, we therefore investigated whether activation of spinal NTS2 receptors suppressed the persistent inflammatory pain symptoms observed after intraplantar injection of formalin.

RESULTS

We first demonstrated that spinally administered NT and NT69L agonists, which bind to both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors, significantly reduced pain-evoked responses during the inflammatory phase of the formalin test. Accordingly, pretreatment with the NTS2-selective analogs JMV-431 and levocabastine was effective in inhibiting the aversive behaviors induced by formalin. With resolution at the single-cell level, we also found that activation of spinal NTS2 receptors reduced formalin-induced c-fos expression in dorsal horn neurons. However, our results also suggest that NTS2-selective agonists and NTS1/NTS2 mixed compounds differently modulated the early (21-39 min) and late (40-60 min) tonic phase 2 and recruited endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms integrated at different levels of the central nervous system. Indeed, while non-selective drugs suppressed pain-related behaviors activity in both part of phase 2, intrathecal injection of NTS2-selective agonists was only efficient in reducing pain during the late phase 2. Furthermore, assessment of the stereotypic pain behaviors of lifting, shaking, licking and biting to formalin also revealed that unlike non-discriminative NTS1/NTS2 analogs reversing all nociceptive endpoint behaviors, pure NTS2 agonists specifically inhibited paw lifting, supporting a role of NTS2 in spinal modulation of persistent nociception.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides the first demonstration that activation of NTS2 receptors produces analgesia in the persistent inflammatory pain model of formalin. The dichotomy between these two classes of compounds also indicates that both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors are involved in tonic pain inhibition and implies that these two NT receptors modulate the pain-induced behavioral responses by acting on distinct spinal and/or supraspinal neural circuits. In conclusion, development of NT agonists targeting both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors could be useful for chronic pain management.

Antinociceptive effects of haloperidol and its metabolites in the formalin test in mice

RATIONALE

Formalin-induced pain is reduced in sigma-1 (sigma1) receptor knockout mice; therefore, we hypothesized that haloperidol and its metabolites I and II, which have affinity for sigma1 receptors, may modulate formalin-induced pain.

RESULTS

Intraplantar administration of formalin (2.5%) to CD-1 mice produced a biphasic period of pain. Haloperidol (0.03-1 mg/kg, s.c.) and reduced haloperidol (metabolite II, 0.25-8 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently inhibited both phases of formalin-induced pain. Haloperidol metabolite I (4-128 mg/kg, s.c.) also produced dose-dependent antinociception in the second phase of the formalin test, but was less potent and effective against first-phase pain. Haloperidol metabolite III (16 and 128 mg/kg) and (-)sulpiride (200 mg/kg), which have no affinity for sigma1 receptors, did not produce significant antinociception in either phase of the formalin test. The order of potency of the drugs to produce their antinociceptive effect [haloperidol>metabolite II>metabolite I>>metabolite III= (-)sulpiride=inactive] correlated with their affinity for sigma1 receptors, but not with their affinity for sigma2 or dopamine D2 receptors. Naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) did not antagonize the antinociception induced by haloperidol and its metabolites. None of the antinociceptive drugs in the formalin test produced any antinociception in the tail flick test.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of haloperidol and its metabolites in the formalin test is not due to unspecific/generalised inhibition of nociception or modulation of opioid receptors, and that it may be related, at least partially, to the ability of these drugs to interact with sigma1 receptors.

Inhibition of chemical and low-intensity mechanical nociception by activation of histamine H3 receptors

Histamine H 3 receptors have been suggested to inhibit the activity of a variety of central and peripheral neurons. Recent studies revealed that activation of spinal histamine H 3 receptors attenuates tail pinch, but not tail flick, nociception. To determine whether H 3 receptor-mediated antinociception is truly modality-specific, the effects of the selective H 3 agonist immepip were evaluated on nociceptive responses in rats induced by a range of thermal and mechanical intensities applied to the hind paw and the tail. In addition, the modulation of chemical nociceptive (ie, formalin) responses by immepip was evaluated. Immepip (5 to 30 mg/kg, subcutaneous) attenuated responses to low-intensity mechanical pinch, but not to high-intensity mechanical pressure applied to either the hind paw or the tail. The same doses of immepip had no effect on thermal nociceptive responses, regardless of the stimulus intensity. These results suggest that immepip-induced antinociception is modality- and intensity-specific. It is likely that immepip inhibits low-intensity mechanical nociception by activation of H 3 receptors located on the spinal terminals of Adelta and possibly C high-threshold mechanoreceptors. In addition, immepip (5 mg/kg, subcutaneous) significantly attenuated formalin-induced flinching, but not formalin-induced licking, during both phase 1 and phase 2, suggesting that H 3 agonists might be effective in treating some forms of clinically relevant pain. Certain classes of pain-transmitting fibers possess histamine H 3 receptors, but the localization and functional significance of these inhibitory receptors was not known. The present study shows that drugs that stimulate H 3 receptors can reduce behavioral responses produced by some, but not all, painful stimuli. Thus, H 3 agonists could be a new type of therapy for certain kinds of pain disorders.

The orofacial formalin test

The subcutaneous injection of formalin into the rat upper lip generates behavioral responses that last several minutes. The time course of the response is similar to what is observed following formalin injection into the paw, i.e. biphasic, with an early and short-lasting first phase followed, after a quiescent period by a second, prolonged (tonic) phase. The applied chemical stimulus (formalin) can be qualified as noxious since it produces tissue injury, activates Adelta and C nociceptors as well as trigeminal and spinal nociceptive neurons and is felt as painful in man. In addition, increasing the concentration of formalin causes a parallel aggravation of histological signs of tissue inflammation and injury. The measured behavioral response (face rubbing) is a relevant end-point: prolonged face rubbing is evoked by formalin but not saline injection and a positive relationship between the amplitude of the response and the formalin concentration is observed, at least up to 2.5%. At higher formalin concentrations, the use of other or additional end-points should be considered. Finally, the behavioral response in the orofacial formalin test is sensitive to various opioid and non-opioid analgesics. The orofacial formalin test can then be considered as a reliable way of producing and quantifying nociception in the trigeminal region of the rat.

Role of micro-opioid receptors in formalin-induced pain behavior in mice

Intraplantar formalin injection is widely used as an experimental model of tonic pain. We investigated the role of endogenous micro-opioid receptor mechanisms in formalin-induced nocifensive behavior in mice. The flinching response induced by formalin (2%, 20 microl) was studied in mice with normal (wild type, n = 8) and absent (homozygous micro-opioid receptor knockout, n = 8) micro-opioid receptor levels. The flinch responses were counted every 5 min for 60 min post-formalin injection. Lumbar spinal cord (L4, 5) was harvested 2 h post-formalin injection to examine c-Fos expression using immunohistochemistry. The effects of naloxone (5 mg/kg, sc) administered 30 min before the intraplantar formalin injection on the flinching response of wild-type mice (n = 7) were also recorded. The second-phase formalin response (10-60 min after formalin) was higher in homozygous micro-opioid receptor knockout mice compared to the wild-type mice (P < 0.01). Naloxone administration in wild-type mice before formalin injection resulted in pain behavior similar to that observed in homozygous micro-opioid receptor knockout mice (P > 0.05). The c-Fos expression induced by formalin injection in the knockout mice was not different from that observed in wild-type mice. Our results suggest that the endogenous micro-opioid system is activated by intraplantar formalin injection and exerts a tonic inhibitory effect on the pain behavior. These results suggest an important modulatory role of endogenous micro-opioid receptor mechanisms in tonic pain states.

Dual effects of intrathecal BAM22 on nociceptive responses in acute and persistent pain--potential function of a novel receptor

Bovine adrenal medulla 22 (BAM22) peptide is one of the cleavage products of proenkephalin A. It binds with high affinity to both opioid receptors and a newly discovered receptor in vitro. This latter receptor was first named sensory neuron-specific receptor and is here named BAM peptide-activated receptor with non-opioid activity (BPAR). BPAR is uniquely distributed in small-diameter DRG neurons, most of which are associated with the IB4 class of nociceptor afferent. The present study examined the effects of intrathecal administration of BAM22 on formalin-induced nocifensive behaviors and tail-withdrawal latency in the rat. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of BAM22 decreased nocifensive behavior scores, measured as the sum of flinching and lifting/licking, in the first and second phases of the formalin test. This decrease was partially attenuated by systemic injection of naloxone. In the presence of naloxone, i.t. BAM22 produced a dose-dependent suppression of the nocifensive behaviors observed during the formalin test. The ratio of the efficacy of BAM22 (5 nmol) in the presence of naloxone over that in the absence of naloxone was 0.65 for flinching and 0.74 for lifting/licking in the second phase. BAM22 at a dose of 5 nmol increased the tail-withdrawal latency by 193 and 119% of baseline in the absence and presence of naloxone, respectively. Systemic administration of naloxone alone enhanced the nocifensive behaviors in the second, but not in the first phase of the formalin test. Naloxone treatment did not alter the tail-withdrawal latency. These data confirm earlier in vitro data showing that BAM22 has both opioid and non-opioid biological actions. The non-opioid action of BAM22 involves inhibition of acute and persistent nociceptive behaviors at the spinal level, presumably mediated via BPAR. The name suggested for this novel receptor, its potential physiological function and its ligand are discussed. British Journal of Pharmacology (2004) 141, 423-430. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705637

Sleep alterations in an experimental orofacial pain model in rats

This study sought to assess sleep patterns in rats injected with Freund's adjuvant (FA) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) as a potential experimental orofacial pain model. Pain response to indomethacin was also assessed. Rats were implanted with electrodes to record electrocorticogram and eletromyogram signals. After a baseline (B) recording, they were injected with Freund's adjuvant (orofacial pain group, n=8) or saline (sham group, n=8) in the temporomandibular joint, and their sleep was monitored over two 12-h light periods. In the second phase of the study, after injecting Freund's adjuvant, indomethacin was administered (1 mg/kg p.o.) at 12- intervals, and sleep patterns were recorded for two additional light periods. The orofacial pain group showed a reduction in sleep efficiency during the two light periods compared with the baseline recording and with the sham group (p<0.001). Increases in sleep and paradoxical sleep (PS) latencies of approximately 200% and 420%, respectively, were observed, as well as an increase in the number of awakenings during both periods (p<0.001). Treatment with indomethacin increased sleep efficiency (p<0.001) and paradoxical sleep time (p<0.001). The number of awakenings (p<0.001) and sleep (p<0.001) and paradoxical sleep latencies (p<0.001) were reduced reestablishing the normal sleep pattern. The results showed the reliability and usefulness of the temporomandibular joint pain model to characterize sleep disturbances related to pain and its response to indomethacin.

Acute antinociceptive responses in single and combinatorial opioid receptor knockout mice: distinct mu, delta and kappa tones

We have examined responses of mice lacking mu, delta and kappa opioid receptor (MOR, DOR and KOR, respectively) genes, as well as combinatorial mutants, in several pain models. This is the first truly comparative study of all three opioid receptor-deficient mice, with genotypes and gender analysis using mice on the hybrid 50% 129/SV : 50% C57BL/6 genetic background. In the tail-immersion test, only KOR-/- females showed decreased withdrawal latencies. This modification was also found in MOR/KOR and MOR/DOR/KOR, but not MOR/DOR mutants. The hotplate test revealed increased nociceptive sensitivity for MOR-/-, a phenotype which was also observed in double mutants involving the MOR deletion, and in the triple mutants. The tail-pressure test showed increased response for both MOR-/- and DOR-/- mutants, a modification which was enhanced in the triple-mutant mice. In the formalin test, MOR-/- and DOR-/- mice showed increased responses in the early and late phases, respectively, while the triple mutant tended to show enhanced nociception in both phases. Finally, the enhanced response of KOR-/- mice in the writhing test, which we have demonstrated previously, was confirmed in double MOR/KOR- and triple-mutant mice. Together, the data support the existence of an antinociceptive opioid tone. Each receptor presents a distinct pattern of activities, with mu receptors influencing responses to mechanical, chemical and thermal nociception at a supraspinal level, kappa receptors involved in spinally mediated thermal nociception and chemical visceral pain, and delta receptors modulating mechanical nociception and inflammatory pain. Phenotypes of mutant mice were subtle, suggesting a low endogenous opioid tone in the regulation of physiological pain.

Sevoflurane suppresses noxious stimulus-evoked expression of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the rat spinal cord via activation of endogenous opioid systems

We investigated the antagonism of sevoflurane antinociception by opioid antagonists in the rat formalin test. Formalin injection into the hindpaw of the rat induces the nocifensive flinching behavior and the expression of Fos-like immunoreactivity (Fos-LI) in the spinal cord. Sevoflurane significantly suppressed the flinching behavior and decreased the number of Fos-LI neurons in the dorsal horn of spinal cord compared with the control group. Moreover, pretreatment with intraperitoneal naloxone plus naltrexone antagonized the suppression of flinching behavior and the decrease of the number of Fos-LI neurons produced by 3% sevoflurane. Intraperitoneal opioid antagonists themselves had no effects on both the behavior response and the expression of Fos-LI induced by formalin injection. This study supports the hypothesis that sevoflurane suppresses the nociceptive response, at least in part, by activating endogenous opioid systems.

Development of a behavioral model of TMJ pain in rats: the TMJ formalin test

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain conditions are poorly understood. Since formalin is a noxious stimulus widely used in animal behavioral experiments for studying pain mechanisms, the aim of this study was to develop a behavioral model to study the TMJ pain conditions by characterizing the nociceptive behavioral responses induced by the injection of formalin into the TMJ region of rats. NaCl (0.9%) or different concentrations of formalin (0.5, 1.5, 2.5 or 5%) were administrated into the TMJ region. The formalin-induced behavioral responses characterized by moving the mandible, rubbing the orofacial region and flinching the head quickly were quantified for 45 min. The TMJ injection of formalin significantly increased the asymmetrical orofacial rubbing and head flinching behaviors, but not the movement of the mandible with concentrations of 1.5% and above (P<0.05, Dunn's test) when compared with the NaCl (0.9%) injection. These responses were significantly reduced (P<0.05, Mann-Whitney test) by the co-application of lidocaine N-ethyl bromide quaternary salt, QX-314 (2%), and by the administration of intraperitoneal morphine (4 mg/kg) 30 min prior to the TMJ formalin injection. This study demonstrates that the injection of formalin into the TMJ region of rats produces quantitative nociceptive behaviors constituting a novel behavioral model for TMJ pain.

Antinociception by tricyclic antidepressants in the rat formalin test: differential effects on different behaviours following systemic and spinal administration

The present study (1) examined analgesic effects of systemically and spinally administered antidepressants (ADs) on phase 2 flinching and biting/licking behaviours in the rat formalin test, a model considered to be of greater relevance to clinical pain than acute threshold tests, and (2) determined whether motor or anti-inflammatory effects contributed to such actions. Systemic administration of amitriptyline (3-20 mg/kg) produced a dose-related enhancement of flinching behaviours, while at the same time suppressing biting/licking behaviours. Imipramine (except for 20 mg/kg), nortriptyline, desipramine and fluoxetine had no significant effect on flinching behaviours, while producing a dose-related suppression of biting/licking behaviours. When administered spinally, either by acute lumbar puncture or via chronically implanted intrathecal cannulas, amitriptyline similarly augmented flinching behaviours. When given by lumbar puncture, amitriptyline suppressed biting/licking behaviours, but when intrathecal cannulas were used, this behaviour was not expressed in the formalin group. Other ADs also suppressed biting/licking behaviours without affecting flinching when given by lumbar puncture. Effects on paw volume were determined at the end of behavioural testing. Systemic administration of all ADs produced a dose-related reduction in paw volume. Spinal administration of nortriptyline by lumbar puncture also reduced paw volume, but for other agents, the reduction was not significant. Motor effects were noted qualitatively throughout these experiments, and considered in relation to nociceptive behaviours. These results indicate (a) a marked dissociation between the effects of systemic ADs on flinching and biting/licking behaviours in the formalin test, (b) spinal efficacy of ADs that essentially reproduces effects seen with systemic administration when given by lumbar puncture, (c) a lack of causality between anti-inflammatory effects of ADs and their analgesic properties in the formalin test, and (d) a contribution of motor effects to analgesic actions at higher doses affecting biting/licking but not flinching behaviours.

Characterization of nociceptive responses and spinal releases of nitric oxide metabolites and glutamate evoked by different concentrations of formalin in rats

A comparison was made of spontaneous nociceptive behaviors elicited by subcutaneous injection of formalin (0.5-10.0%) into the plantar or dorsal surface of the right hindpaw in rats. In the present study, we also examined the effect of paw formalin injection on the release of nitric oxide (NO) metabolites (nitrite/nitrate) and glutamate from the spinal cord in anesthetized rats using a dialysis probe placed in the lumbar subarachnoid space. Two distinct quantifiable behaviors indicative of pain were identified by formalin injected into both regions of the paw. There were no significant alterations in the number of flinches during the early and late phases induced by different regions of formalin injection. However, the early phase licking/biting activity evoked by formalin injection into the plantar surface of the paw was significantly higher than that evoked by formalin injected into the dorsal region. The maximum effect in the early and late phases was produced by 5.0% formalin injection into the dorsal and plantar paw. At a higher concentration (10.0%) of formalin, nociceptive behavioral responses were decreased except for the late phase flinching when injected into the dorsal paw. Injections of formalin (5.0%) into both regions of the paw evoked a biphasic spinal release of nitrite/nitrate with a significant increase during the early phase (0-10 min) and the late phase (30-80 or 90 min). A higher concentration of formalin (10.0%) failed to produce a clear-cut release of nitrite/nitrate. A significant increase of glutamate was observed in the 0-10 min samples obtained after injection of formalin (5.0%) into the plantar and dorsal surface of the paw, whereas 0.5 and 10.0% formalin induced no substantial release. These results suggest that 5.0% formalin should be used when studying antinociceptive activity of NO- and N-methyl-D-aspartate-related compounds in the formalin test in rats. Formalin injection into the plantar surface of the paw might prove to be useful for evoking the licking/biting response, particularly in the early phase.

Opioidergic and adrenergic modulation of formalin-evoked spinal c-fos mRNA expression and nocifensive behavior in the rat

Fos protein expression has been used to reflect neuronal activation in pain processing pathways although analgesics may uncouple behavioral and Fos responses. We determine whether formalin-induced spinal c-fos mRNA expression (Northern blotting) correlates with nocifensive behavior following pretreatment with morphine, the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine, or their respective antagonists naloxone and atipamezole. Both opiate and alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists reduced formalin-induced c-fos gene transcription and nocifensive behavior via their cognate receptors. Unexpectedly, blockade of either the opiate or alpha2-adrenergic receptors, alone, caused an increase in formalin-evoked c-fos mRNA; while blocking the opiate receptor had no effect on formalin-induced behavior, alpha2-adrenoceptor block had an analgesic effect, indicating discordance between c-fos message transcription and nocifensive behavior. We concluded that the formalin-induced spinal c-fos signal was a poor predictor of the behavioral response to pharmacological manipulation of pain processing pathways.

Naloxone inhibits gastric emptying in the rat

Naloxone is generally considered to be a pure antagonist, but it may produce several behavioral effects, such as hyperalgesia or stimulation of respiration. We studied the effect of naloxone on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in rats. Six to eight Wistar rats (200-250 g) were used for each experiment. Either saline or naloxone (0.01-10 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally at 0 min. At 30 min, radiolabeled saline or milk 1 mL was infused into the stomach. At 60 min, gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit were calculated by measuring the radioactivity in the gastrointestinal tract. Naloxone significantly inhibited gastric emptying of saline (P = 0.002) and of milk (P < 0.05), but not the gastrointestinal transit of either (P > 0.05). Gastric emptying of saline showed a significant peak (P < 0.05) in the dose-response curve at 0.7 mg/kg. Therefore, naloxone significantly inhibits gastric emptying of saline and milk, but not the gastrointestinal transit of either.

IMPLICATIONS

Although naloxone is generally considered to be a pure opioid receptor antagonist, it delays gastric emptying of saline or milk, as does morphine in the rat. However, it is uncertain from our results whether naloxone inhibited gastric emptying by antagonizing the effects of endogenous opioids.

Herpes virus-mediated preproenkephalin gene transfer to the amygdala is antinociceptive

To evaluate the role of the amygdala in pain modulation and opioid-mediated antinociception, a recombinant, replication-defective herpes virus carrying the human preproenkephalin cDNA was injected bilaterally into the rat amygdala. Four days after gene delivery nociceptive behavior was assessed by the formalin test. Rats infected with the virus expressing preproenkephalin showed a selective, naloxone-reversible abolition of phase 2 flinching behavior compared to rats infected with a control virus. The results implicate the amygdala in the control of pain and in opioid analgesia and demonstrate the use of recombinant herpes viruses as tools for studying gene function in specific neural pathways of the central nervous system.

Microinjections of muscimol into lateral superior colliculus disrupt orienting and oral movements in the formalin model of pain

An important reaction in rodent models of persistent pain is for the animal to turn and bite/lick the source of discomfort (autotomy). Comparatively little is known about the supraspinal pathways which mediate this reaction. Since autotomy requires co-ordinated control of the head and mouth, it is possible that basal ganglia output via the superior colliculus may be involved; previously this projection has been implicated in the control of orienting and oral behaviour. The purpose of the present study was therefore, to test whether the striato-nigro-tectal projection plays a significant role in oral responses elicited by subcutaneous injections of formalin. Behavioural output from this system is normally associated with the release of collicular projection neurons from tonic inhibitory input from substantia nigra pars reticulata. Therefore, in the present study normal disinhibitory signals from the basal ganglia were blocked by injecting the GABA agonist muscimol into different regions of the rat superior colliculus. c-Fos immunohistochemistry was used routinely to provide regional estimates of the suppressive effects of muscimol on neuronal activity. Biting and licking directed to the site of a subcutaneous injection of formalin (50 microliters of 4%) into the hind-paw were suppressed in a dose-related manner by bilateral microinjections of muscimol into the lateral superior colliculus (10-50 ng; 0.5 microliter/side); injections into the medial superior colliculus had little effect. Bilateral injections of muscimol 20 ng into lateral colliculus caused formalin-treated animals to re-direct their attention and activity from lower to upper regions of space. Muscimol injected unilaterally into lateral superior colliculus elicited ipsilateral turning irrespective of which hind-paw was injected with formalin. Oral behaviour was blocked when the muscimol and formalin injections were contralaterally opposed; this was also true for formalin injections into the front foot. Interestingly, when formalin was injected into the perioral region, injections of muscimol into the lateral superior colliculus had no effect on the ability of animals to make appropriate contralaterally directed head and body movements to facilitate localization of the injected area with either front- or hind-paw. These findings suggest that basal ganglia output via the lateral superior colliculus is critical for responses to noxious stimuli which entail the mouth moving to and acting on the foot, but not when the foot is the active agent applied to the mouth. The data also suggest that pain produces a spatially non-specific facilitation of units throughout collicular maps, which can be converted into a spatially inappropriate signal by locally suppressing parts of the map with the muscimol.

Selective blockade of peripheral delta opioid agonist induced antinociception by intrathecal administration of delta receptor antisense oligodeoxynucleotide

Previous studies have shown that intrathecal (i.t.) administration of antisense, but not mismatch, oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) to the cloned delta opioid receptor (DOR) can inhibit the antinociceptive actions of i.t. delta (delta), but not mu (mu) or kappa (kappa), opioid agonists. As a major portion of spinal opioid receptors are localized on the central terminals of the small afferent fibers, we hypothesized that the effects of antisense ODNs given i.t. might be the result of actions at the level of the cell body in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). This possibility was investigated by assessing the antinociceptive actions of an i.t. or intrapaw (ipaw) administered mu (morphine), delta ([D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin) or kappa (CI977) opioid agonist in rats treated with i.t. saline or antisense or mismatch ODNs to the DOR (12.5 micrograms, twice-daily for 3 days). The opioid agonists produced significant antinociception in the 5% formalin-flinch test following either i.t. or ipaw administration. DOR antisense ODN treatment blocked the antinociceptive actions of both i.t. or ipaw [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin without affecting the antinociceptive actions of i.t. or ipaw morphine or CI977. Radioligand binding studies with [3H]naltrindole (NTI), a delta selective antagonist, indicated an approximate 50% decrease in delta opioid receptors in the lumbar spinal cord following i.t. DOR antisense, but not mismatch, ODN treatment. DOR antisense or mismatch ODN treatment did not affect nu or kappa radioligand binding in lumbar spinal cord. These data suggest the possibility that peripheral proteins can be targeted with i.t. antisense ODNs providing significant opportunities for the exploration of the physiological and pathological significance of these substances.

alpha-Adrenoceptor and opioid receptor modulation of clonidine-induced antinociception

1. The antinociceptive action of clonidine (Clon) and the interactions with alpha 1, alpha 2 adrenoceptor and opioid receptor antagonists was evaluated in mice by use of chemical algesiometric test (acetic acid writhing test). 2. Clon produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive action and the ED50 for intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) was lower than for intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration (1 ng kg-1 vs 300 ng kg-1). The parallelism of the dose-response curves indicates activation of a common receptor subtype. 3. Systemic administration of prazosin and terazosin displayed antinociceptive activity. Pretreatment with prazosin produced a dual action: i.c.v. Clon effect did not change, and i.p. Clon effect was enhanced. Yohimbine i.c.v. or i.p. did not induce antinonciception, but antagonized Clon-induced activity. These results suggest that alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors, either located at the pre- and/or post-synaptic level, are involved in the control of spinal antinociception. 4. Naloxone (NX) and naltrexone (NTX) induced antinociceptive effects at low doses (microgram kg-1 range) and a lower antinociceptive effect at higher doses (mg kg-1 range). Low doses of NX or NTX antagonized Clon antinociception, possibly in relation to a preferential mu opioid receptor antagonism. In contrast, high doses of NX or NTX increased the antinociceptive activity of Clon, which could be due to an enhanced inhibition of the release of substance P. 5. The results obtained in the present work suggest the involvement of alpha 1-, alpha 2-adrenoceptor and opioid receptors in the modulation of the antinociceptive activity of clonidine, which seems to be exerted either at spinal and/or supraspinal level.

Antinociception by adenosine analogs and an adenosine kinase inhibitor: dependence on formalin concentration

Spinal administration of adenosine analogs and an adenosine kinase inhibitor produces antinociception in thermal threshold tests. In the present study, we determined the effects of N6-cyclohexyladenosine (adenosine A1 receptor selective), 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadeno sine (CGS-21680) (adenosine A2A receptor selective), and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) (non-selective), on formalin induced nociceptive responses (flinching/lifting and licking/biting) using two concentrations of formalin (2% and 5%). We also examined the antinociceptive effects of 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine, an adenosine kinase inhibitor, and deoxycoformycin, an adenosine deaminase inhibitor, under these conditions. Adenosine A1 receptor agonists, but not the A2A selective agent, produced significant antinociception, as did 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine, but not deoxycoformycin. The extent of antinociception produced was greater with the lower stimulus intensity. The effects of NECA and 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine were inhibited by caffeine, indicating the involvement of cell surface adenosine receptors in their actions. We conclude (a) that the adenosine A1, but not the A2A, receptor is involved in spinally mediated antinociception, (b) that adenosine kinase is more important than adenosine deaminase in regulating endogenous adenosine levels in the spinal cord, and (c) that stimulus intensity is an important determinant of the efficacy of purines in the spinal cord.

Different effects of two aldose reductase inhibitors on nociception and prostaglandin E

This study examined the effect of two structurally dissimilar aldose reductase inhibitors, N-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-6-methoxy-1- napthalenyl]thioxomethyl]-N-methlyglycine (tolrestat) and 4-amino-2,6-dimethylphenyl-sulphonyl nitromethane (ICI 222155), on formalin-evoked behavioural responses in control and diabetic rats and on capsaicin-evoked release of prostaglandin E from spinal cord slices in vitro. Both compounds, given orally for 4 weeks, prevented hyperalgesia in diabetic rats 5-20 min after hindpaw formalin injection. ICI 222155 also prevented hyperalgesia in diabetic rats 21-60 min after formalin, whereas tolrestat suppressed activity in diabetic rats below controls and also suppressed activity in controls when given orally or intrathecally. Capsaicin-evoked release of prostaglandin E from spinal cord slices of control rats was significantly reduced by tolrestat, but not ICI 222155. These data suggest that hyperalgesia in diabetic rats is related to glucose metabolism by aldose reductase, whereas tolrestat has specific effects on formalin-evoked nociception associated with an ability to reduce spinal prostaglandin release.

Effect of p-chlorophenylalanine and alpha-methyltyrosine on the antinociceptive effect of antidepressant drugs

The role of para-chlorophenylalanine and alpha-methyl-DL-p-tyrosine in the antinociceptive effects of the intracerebroventricular administration of the antidepressant drugs clomipramine, zimelidine, imipramine and maprotiline was studied using the acetic acid writhing test in mice. The results demonstrated an antinociceptive effect for all these antidepressants. Pretreatment with para-chlorophenylalanine significantly reduced the antinociception induced by the ED50's of imipramine and maprotiline, and did not modify the effects of zimelidine and clomipramine, pretreatment with alpha-methyl-tyrosine did not modify the antinociception induced by these drugs except maprotiline. Pretreatment with para-chlorophenylalanine plus alpha-methyltyrosine significantly reduced the antinociceptive effect of all the antidepressants tested. The main finding of the present study is that the association of para-chlorophenylalanine plus alpha-methyltyrosine reduced the antinociceptive action of all the antidepressants. This means that critical levels of both 5-HT and NA are responsible for mediating the antinociceptive effects of antidepressants on the writhing test in mice.

The orofacial formalin test in rats: effects of different formalin concentrations

In this study of the orofacial formalin test in rats, the effects of different formalin concentrations (0.2%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, 5% and 10%) on the behavioural nociceptive response (face rubbing) was investigated. The histological responses of the skin were also evaluated. Increasing the concentration of formalin caused a parallel aggravation of histological signs of tissue inflammation and injury. All concentrations provoked an early phase of nociceptive response, but its intensity was not concentration-dependent. The 2nd phase of response to formalin only occurred for concentrations of 1.5% and higher. A positive relationship between the formalin concentration and the amplitude of the rubbing activity measured between 12 and 45 min after injection could be observed until 2.5% but with the highest concentrations (5 and 10%), the amplitude of the response decreased. Our findings indicate that the orofacial formalin test should be carried out using concentration between 0.5 and 2.5%. This is essential to assess increase as well as decrease in pain intensity. Moreover, this will have the effect of minimizing the suffering of the experimental animal.

Caffeine antinociception in the rat hot-plate and formalin tests and locomotor stimulation: involvement of noradrenergic mechanisms

The present study examined antinociception produced by systemic administration of caffeine in the rat hot-plate (HP) and formalin tests and addressed several aspects of the mechanism of action of caffeine. Locomotor activity was monitored throughout. Caffeine produced a dose-related antinociception the HP (50-100 mg/kg) and formalin tests (12.5-75 mg/kg). When observed during the formalin test, caffeine stimulated locomotor activity between 12.5 and 50 mg/kg; this was followed by a depression in activity at 75 mg/kg. Caffeine did not produce an anti-inflammatory effect as determined by hindpaw plethysmometry, suggesting that antinociception was not secondary to an anti-inflammatory action. Peripheral co-administration of caffeine with the formalin did not produce antinociception, suggesting a predominant central rather than peripheral site of action for caffeine. Naloxone (10 mg/kg) did not reduce the antinociceptive or locomotor stimulant effects of caffeine, suggesting a lack of involvement of endogenous opioids in these actions. Phentolamine (5 mg/kg) enhanced antinociception by caffeine in both the HP and formalin tests, but inhibited locomotor stimulation. Prazosin (0.15 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on locomotor stimulation, but idazoxan (0.5 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on antinociception in the formalin test. These observations suggest an involvement of different alpha-adrenergic receptors in the two actions of phentolamine. Microinjection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the locus coeruleus, which depleted noradrenaline (NA) in the spinal cord and forebrain, inhibited the action of caffeine in the HP test. This was mimicked by intrathecal 6-OHDA which depleted NA in the spinal cord, but not by microinjection of 6-OHDA into the dorsal bundle which depleted NA in the forebrain. These results suggest an integral involvement of noradrenergic mechanisms in the antinociceptive action of caffeine in the HP and formalin tests and in locomotor stimulation, but the nature of this involvement differs for the 3 end points.

Enhanced nociceptive behaviour following conditioning injection of formalin in the perioral area of the rat

The possible existence of long-term modifications in response to a transient nociceptive conditioning stimulation was investigated in the rat in three experiments. (1) A nociceptive conditioning stimulus was delivered in the form of a s.c. formalin injection (conditioning injection) in the left upper lip. Evaluation of the nociceptive behaviour triggered by another formalin injection (testing injection) made in the controlateral right upper lip was carried out in distinct groups of rats 7, 14 or 28 days after the conditioning. An enhanced nociceptive response at day 7 and 14 and a return to the baseline at day 28 were observed. (2) A similar protocol was developed with formalin used for both conditioning and testing but an anaesthetic blockade of the infraorbital nerve was performed just before the conditioning injection to suppress the initial barrage. The change observed at day 7 was suppressed by the nerve block. (3) A conditioning nociceptive stimulus was applied either ipsilaterally to the right lower lip or to the tail. An increased nociceptive response was observed when the conditioning stimulus was applied to the same side as the test stimulus but no increase in the formalin test response was detected when the conditioning stimulus was applied to the tail. These results indicated that, after a single formalin injection in the left upper lip, a hyperexcitability developed that depended on the initial barrage, lasted for at least 2 weeks, was no longer present at 4 weeks and might rely on a segmental mechanism. The hypothesis of a central sensitization triggered by an initial barrage and maintained by an ongoing input induced from the periphery is discussed.

Tolrestat treatment prevents modification of the formalin test model of prolonged pain in hyperglycemic rats

This study examined the effects of hyperglycemia and treatment with the aldose reductase inhibitor, Tolrestat, on the pain behavior evoked by injection of formalin into the dorsum of a single hind paw. In control rats, injection of formalin (50 microliters of a 5% solution) evoked two phases of flinching of the injected paw (phases 1 and 2), separated by a quiescent period. Four weeks of streptozotocin-induced diabetes or galactose intoxication did not alter the frequency of flinching during either of the active phases but significantly (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) enhanced flinch frequency during the quiescent period. Concurrent treatment with Tolrestat (50 mg/kg/day by gavage) during hyperglycemia prevented the accumulation of the polyol pathway metabolites sorbitol and fructose in the nerve and spinal cord of streptozotocin-diabetic rats and also significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the enhanced flinching of diabetic rats during the quiescent period. These data demonstrate that hyperglycemia induces a period of Tolrestate-preventable hyperalgesia in a paradigm that is used to model persistent pain and suggest that exaggerated flux through aldose reductase may initiate changes in nociceptive pathways that could contribute to some of the pain states experienced by patients with diabetic neuropathy.