Somatostatin-induced inhibition of neurotransmission in the mouse isolated vas deferens is resistant to pertussis toxin

Advances in understanding neuronal somatostatin receptors

It has long been considered that somatostatin acts as a neuromodulator in the mammalian central nervous system but its precise physiological roles remain elusive. Early studies to identify somatostatin-binding sites revealed a widespread heterogeneous pattern, especially in the CNS. More recently, a family of somatostatin receptors have been identified, of which five genes (sst(1-5)) have been cloned. In this review, we discuss current data describing the localisation of the five receptor types. Recent progress in understanding their function has been made using high-affinity, selective receptor ligands and transgenic animal technology. Finally, the therapeutic potential for somatostatin receptor-selective compounds as analgesics is considered.

Selective somatostatin sst(2) receptor blockade with the novel cyclic octapeptide, CYN-154806

The cyclic octapeptide, CYN-154806, inhibited specific [(125)I]-[Tyr(11)]-SRIF binding to CHO-K1 cell membranes expressing human recombinant somatostatin (SRIF) sst(2) receptors (pIC(50) 8. 58) or rat sst(2(a)) and rat sst(2(b)) receptors (pIC(50) 8.35 and 8. 10, respectively). The affinity of CYN-154806 at other human somatostatin receptor types was at least 100 times lower (pIC(50) 5. 41-6.48). In functional studies, CYN-154806 inhibited SRIF-induced increases in extracellular acidification (EAR) in CHO-K1 cells expressing h sst(2) receptors (pK(B) 7.92) but had no effect on UTP-induced increases in EAR. CYN-154806 also blocked SRIF-induced increases [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding in CHO-K1 cell membranes expressing h sst(2) receptors as well as rat sst(2(a)) and rat sst(2(b)) receptors (pK(B) 7.81, 7.68 and 7.96, respectively). In marked contrast, no blockade was observed at h sst(5) receptors in concentrations as high 10 microM. The antagonistic activity of CYN-154806 was also studied in isolated tissue preparations that are known to express endogenous SRIF receptors. Thus CYN-154806 blocked SRIF, but not DAMGO-induced inhibition of neurogenic contractions in rat isolated vas deferens and guinea-pig ileum (pK(B) 7.79 and 7.49, respectively). CYN-154806 had no effect on SRIF-28 induced inhibition of neurogenic contractions in guinea-pig vas deferens. The results demonstrate that CYN-154806 is a highly potent specific and selective SRIF sst(2) receptor blocking drug. Furthermore, sst(2) receptors mediate SRIF-induced inhibition of neurogenic contractions in rat vas deferens and guinea-pig ileum but not guinea-pig vas deferens which is thought to be mediated by sst(5) receptors.

Somatostatin reduces the meningeal arterial blood flow in the rat

The effect of somatostatin (SOM) on neurogenic increases in meningeal blood flow was examined in barbiturate anaesthetized rats. The parietal skull was trepanized and the blood flow in the medial meningeal artery was monitored using a laser Doppler flowmeter with needle probes. Electrical stimulation (pulses of 8-10 V at 5-10 Hz for 30 s) close to the superior sagittal sinus evoked reproducible increases in blood flow. These increases were reduced by topical applications of SOM at concentrations of 10(-5)-10(-3) M in a dose-dependent manner. The effect was most pronounced within 10 min after application of SOM followed by a recovery of the flow responses. We conclude that stimulus-evoked increases in dural arterial flow, which are most likely caused by afferent activation and can be regarded as an element of neurogenic inflammation, are reduced by anti-inflammatory peptides such as SOM.

Physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling

Heterotrimeric G proteins in vertebrates constitute a family molecular switches that transduce the activation of a populous group of cell-surface receptors to a group of diverse effector units. The receptors include the photopigments such as rhodopsin and prominent families such as the adrenergic, muscarinic acetylcholine, and chemokine receptors involved in regulating a broad spectrum of responses in humans. Signals from receptors are sensed by heterotrimeric G proteins and transduced to effectors such as adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases, and various ion channels. Physiological regulation of G protein-linked receptors allows for integration of signals that directly or indirectly effect the signaling from receptor-->G protein-->effector(s). Steroid hormones can regulate signaling via transcriptional control of the activities of the genes encoding members of G protein-linked pathways. Posttranscriptional mechanisms are under physiological control, altering the stability of preexisting mRNA and affording an additional level for regulation. Protein phosphorylation, protein prenylation, and proteolysis constitute major posttranslational mechanisms employed in the physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling. Drawing upon mechanisms at all three levels, physiological regulation permits integration of demands placed on G protein-linked signaling.

Vascular actions of octreotide in the portal hypertensive rat

1. We have investigated the actions of the somatostatin analogue octreotide in the portal hypertensive Wistar rat in vivo and in rat small mesenteric artery and aorta in vitro. 2. In small mesenteric artery, octreotide (0.1-0.3 microM) failed to produce any direct contraction, nor did it affect contractions to noradrenaline (NA, 10 microM) or endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine. 3. In rat aorta, octreotide (0.3 microM) and somatostatin (1 microM) failed to affect contractions to NA (1 microM), or concentration-contractile response curves to NA. 4. In rat vas deferens, octreotide and somatostatin significantly reduced contractile responses to electrical stimulation with pD2 values (-log IC50) of 8.19 +/- 0.10 (n = 4) and 8.16 +/- 0.26 (n = 4), respectively. Hence, the lack of effect of these agents in aorta or mesenteric artery was not due to lack of efficacy or inappropriate choice of concentration. 5. In the anaesthetized portal hypertensive rat, intravenous injection of octreotide (1-100 microg kg[-1]) did not significantly affect systemic blood pressure, nor did it affect mesenteric vascular conductance as measured by laser doppler flow probes. However, octreotide (100 microg kg[-1]) significantly reduced vascular conductance to 74.2 +/- 7.7% of control (n = 6) in porto-systemic shunt vessels as measured by laser doppler flow probes. 6. Phenylephrine (1 microg kg[-1]) significantly raised blood pressure and significantly decreased vascular conductance in both mesenteric (66.6 +/- 3.7% of control) and porto-systemic shunt vessels (58.7 +/- 10.0% of control). 7. It was concluded that octreotide has selective effects on porto-systemic shunt vessles in vivo in the portal hypertensive rat.

A quantitative autoradiographical study on the distribution of somatostatin sst2 receptors in the rat central nervous system using [125I]-BIM-23027

The kinetic properties, steady state binding characteristics and autoradiographic distribution of the somatostatin (SRIF) sst2 receptor-selective ligand, [125I]-BIM-23027, have been investigated in the rat central nervous system. Analysis of kinetic, saturation and competition binding data in rat hippocampal membranes was consistent with [125I]-BIM-23207 binding to a single population of non-interacting binding sites. Competition studies, using different SRIF ligands suggested that [125I]-BIM-23027 was binding to sites similar to that of the recombinant sst2 receptor. The rank order of affinity for displacing specific binding was BIM-23027 = SRIF > L-362855 > > BIM-23056. There was a widespread distribution of [125I]-BIM-23027 binding sites in the rat central nervous system. The highest density of binding was observed in the dentate gyrus, medial habenular, amygdala, claustrum and lateral septum as well as in the piriform, cingulate and parietal cortex. The cervical and lumbar spinal cord also displayed moderate levels of binding localized to the substantia gelatinosa. The cellular localization of [125I]-BIM-23027 binding was found to be associated with dendritic terminal fields. In contrast, the cellular signal for sst2 receptor mRNA was restricted to cell somata. The widespread distribution of [125I]-BIM-23027 binding sites within the brain suggests that receptors similar to the recombinant sst2 receptor may mediate a variety of different physiological effects within the central nervous system.

Somatostatin receptors mediating inhibition of basal and stimulated electrogenic ion transport in rat isolated distal colonic mucosa

The aim of this study was to examine the potencies of several recently identified selective somatostatin (SRIF)-receptor ligands as inhibitors of electrogenic ion transport in the rat distal colonic mucosa with the view to identifying the SRIF receptor type involved. Under basal conditions, cumulative administration of SRIF and SRIF28 decreased short circuit current (SCC), a measure of electrogenic ion transport, with EC50 values of 4 nM and 9 nM respectively. The peptidase inhibitors, phosphoramidon (1 microM) and amastatin (10 microM), has no effect on the potencies of either SRIF or SRIF28. The inhibitory action of SRIF on basal SCC was suppressed by piretanide and diphenylamine-2-carboxylate, compatible with the assumption that the Na+K+2Cl- co-transporter and Cl- channels, respectively, may be involved in this antisecretory action of SRIF. Tetrodotoxin (1 microM) had no effect on the antisecretory action of SRIF, suggesting that the process was not neuronally mediated. All of the SRIF analogues examined, with the exception of BIM-23056, maximally inhibited basal SCC to a similar extent as SRIF. Seglitide and octreotide were both more potent antisecretory agents than SRIF (respective EC50 values, 0.4 nM and 1.5 nM) suggesting that this effect was mediated by a receptor belonging to the SRIF1 receptor group. The most distinguishing feature of the rank order of agonist potencies was the high potency of the selective sst2 receptor ligand, BIM-23027 (EC50 value 0.32 nM), the weaker potency exhibited by the selective sst5 receptor ligand, L-362855 (EC50 value 21 nM), and the lack of agonist activity displayed by the selective sst3 receptor ligand, BIM-23056 (EC50 value > 1000 nM). This profile is comparable with that observed in binding studies on the recombinant sst2 receptor. Forskolin-stimulated secretion was suppressed by SRIF analogues with the rank order of agonist potencies BIM-23027 > SRIF > L-362855 >> BIM-23056 which resembled that exhibited under basal conditions. However, the absolute potencies of these agonists were lower (respective EC50 values 2 nM, 14 nM< 38 nM and > 1000 nM) whilst the magnitude of inhibition was about three fold greater. BIM-23027 and SRIF (both 30 nM) also inhibited carbachol-stimulated increases in basal SCC by 60-70%, while a similar concentration of L-362855 inhibited these responses by 11%. BIM-23056 (1 microM) had no effect on carbachol-simulated secretion. Radioligand binding studies on rat colonic mucosal membranes using [125I]-Tyr11-SRIF suggested heterogeneity of SRIF binding sites. Thus, SRIF and SRIF28 competed for binding (IC50 values, 0.32 and 0.63 nM, respectively) with Hill slopes less than unity; while seglitide and BIM-23027 both maximally displaced only 30-40% of specific binding with apparent high affinity (respective pIC50 values, 10.1 nM and 10.0). In conclusion, SRIF decreases basal as well as both cAMP and Ca(2+)-dependent Cl- secretion in rat colonic mucosa. The rank order of agonist potencies suggests that receptors resembling the recombinant sst2 receptor mediate inhibition of basal and forskolin-stimulated secretion. Radioligand binding studies suggest that BIM-23027 interacts with a sub-population of [125I]Tyr11-SRIF binding sites in rat colonic mucosal membranes which probably corresponds to the receptors mediating the antisecretory effects described here.

Further evidence from functional studies for somatostatin receptor heterogeneity in guinea-pig isolated ileum, vas deferens and right atrium

1. Somatostatin (SRIF) causes a concentration-dependent inhibition of neurotransmission in guinea-pig ileum and vas deferens as well as negative inotropy in guinea-pig isolated right atrium. The SRIF receptors mediating these effects have now been further characterized by use of the peptides BIM-23027, BIM-23056 and L-362855, reported as selective for the recombinant SRIF receptor types, sst2, sst3 and sst5, respectively. 2. BIM-23027 was a highly potent agonist at causing an inhibition of neurotransmission in the guinea-pig ileum (EC50 value 1.9 nM), being about 3 times more potent than SRIF (EC50 value 6.8 nM). In contrast, in both guinea-pig vas deferens and right atrial preparations, BIM-23027 was a relatively weak agonist being at least 30-100 times weaker than SRIF. In guinea-pig atria, BIM-23027 (3 microM) antagonized the negative inotropic action of SRIF28 (apparent pKB = 5.9 +/- 0.1) but had no effect on the negative inotropic action of cyclohexyladenosine. 3. The inhibitory effect of BIM-23027 in the guinea-pig ileum was readily desensitized. Prior exposure to BIM-23027 (0.3 microM) markedly attenuated the inhibitory effect of SRIF but had no effect on the inhibitory action of clonidine suggesting that BIM-23027 and SRIF act via a common receptor mechanism. 4. L-362855 caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of neurotransmission in both the guinea-pig ileum and vas deferens as well as causing negative inotropy in the guinea-pig atrium but was at least 30-100 times weaker than SRIF. In guinea-pig isolated atria, L-362855 (3 microM) did not antagonize the negative inotropic action of SRIF28. 5. BIM-23056 in concentrations up to 1 microM was inactive as an agonist in guinea-pig isolated ileum, vas deferens and atrium and did not antagonize the inhibitory actions of SRIF in any of these preparations.6. The results from this study support our previous contention that the sst2 receptor type mediates inhibition of neurotransmission by SRIF in the guinea-pig ileum. The SRIF receptor type mediating inhibition of neurotransmission in the guinea-pig vas deferens appears different, but similar, to that mediating negative inotropy in the atrium. However the characteristics of these latter receptors appear different from that of the recombinant sst2, sst3 and sst5 receptors for SRIF described for rat and man.

Classification and nomenclature of somatostatin receptors

There is considerable controversy about the classification and nomenclature of somatostatin receptors. To date, five distinct receptor genes have been cloned and named chronologically according to their respective publication dates, but two were unfortunately given the same appellation (SSTR4). Consensually, a nomenclature for the recombinant receptors has been agreed according to IUPHAR guidelines (sst1, sst2, sst3, sst4, and sst5). However, a more informative classification is to be preferred for the future, employing all classification criteria in an integrated scheme. It is already apparent that the five recombinant receptors fall into two classes or groups, on the basis of not only structure but also pharmacological characteristics. One class (already referred to by some as SRIF1) appears to comprise sst2, sst3 and sst5 receptor subtypes. The other class (SRIF2) appears to comprise the other two recombinant receptor subtypes (sst1 and sst4). This promising approach is discussed but it is acknowledged that much more data from endogenous receptors in whole tissues are needed before further recommendations on somatostatin receptor nomenclature can be made.