Muscarinic receptor binding and the effect of atropine on the guinea-pig iris

Mechanisms of adaptive supersensitivity in vas deferens

Adaptive supersensitivity is a phenomenon characteristic of excitable tissues and discloses as a compensatory adjustment of tissue's response to unrelated stimulatory endogenous and exogenous substances after chronic interruption of excitatory neurotransmission. The mechanisms underlying such higher postjunctional sensitivity have been postulated for a variety of cell types. In smooth muscles, especially the vas deferens with its rich sympathetic innervation, the mechanisms responsible for supersensitivity are partly understood and appear to be different from one species to another. The present review provides a general understanding of adaptive supersensitivity and emphasizes early and recent information about the putative mechanisms involved in this phenomenon in rodent vas deferens.

Characterization of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in the rabbit iris

The sphincter smooth muscle of the iris is innervated by excitatory parasympathetic nerve fibers, and the activation of these fibers results in the breakdown of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate into its derived second messengers, myosin light chain phosphorylation and muscle contraction. The present study characterizes the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) of the rabbit iris employing [3H]N-methylscopolamine ([3H]NMS) and L-[3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]QNB) as probes. Binding studies indicated that [3H]NMS and [3H]QNB bound to homogeneous populations of mAChRs with apparent Bmax values of 0.67 and 1.09 pmol/mg protein respectively. Binding of radioligands was rapid, saturable, stereospecific, reversible, and inhibited by specific muscarinic agonists and antagonists in a competitive manner. [3H]NMS displayed a lower amount of nonspecific binding and a faster association and dissociation rate than [3H]QNB. The relative potencies for displacement of both radioligands, based on their Ki values, were (-)QNB greater than atropine greater than (+)QNB greater than pirenzepine greater than pilocarpine. Antagonist displacement of the radioligands appeared to obey the law of mass action, indicating interaction with a single binding site. However, displacement of the radioligands by the agonists carbamylcholine and methacholine indicated interaction with both high and low affinity binding sites. Comparison of the displacement of [3H]NMS and [3H]QNB by pirenzepine in microsomal fractions from rabbit iris, ileal muscle and cerebral cortex revealed the presence of a single subtype of mAChR in the iris which had an affinity for PZ that was slightly higher than that of ileal M2 receptors, but lower than that of brain M1 receptors. This suggests that the mAChRs in the iris may represent a subclass of receptors within the M2 subtype, or they may constitute an entirely different subtype of mAChRs.

Muscarinic receptor density in the rat urinary bladder after denervation, hypertrophy and urinary diversion

Parasympathetic denervation of the urinary bladder results in supersensitivity to muscarinic agonists and in bladder hypertrophy. In the present study, the effects of denervation on the muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder were investigated, using a receptor binding technique with (-)3H-QNB as radioligand. The density of muscarinic receptors was increased in denervated, hypertrophied bladders but it was decreased, below that in control bladders, when the development of hypertrophy was prevented by urinary diversion. A decreased receptor density was also found in innervated bladders after urinary diversion, whereas the receptor density was unaffected by hypertrophy alone. Competition experiments with methacholine revealed no changes in the agonist binding properties of the receptors. When the present data are combined with those in previous functional studies, it seems unlikely that the muscarinic receptors in the bladder are involved in the development of supersensitivity. It is suggested that the density of muscarinic receptors in the bladder may be related to the bladder function.

Cholinergic systems and multiple cholinergic receptors in ocular tissues

Acetylcholine (ACh), choline acetyltransferases and cholinesterases occur in cornea, iris-ciliary body complex and retina of several vertebrates. In cornea, ACh may serve as a sensory transmitter as well as a local hormone, the function of which is not delineated. The function of ACh as the parasympathetic neurotransmitter at the iris and ciliary body is well established. The muscarinic receptors on the iris smooth muscle are similar to the muscarinic receptors (M2 type in two way classification) at other smooth muscles towards their interaction with agonists and antagonists. Binding studies using radiolabeled antagonists and their displacement by agonists indicate that muscarinic receptors in membranes of iris-ciliary body complex are heterogeneous indicating more than one subtype of muscarinic receptors. A subtype other than M2 receptors may occur at the presynaptic sites of parasympathetic nerves, which have yet to be investigated using specific agonists and antagonists. Cholinergic markers, choline acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase, differ quantitatively and qualitatively in retinas of different species. However, amacrine cells are cholinergic in all vertebrate species. Although they make up 1% of retinal neurons, they influence the activity of a majority of ganglion cells. Cholinergic effects in ganglia are mediated through nicotinic and muscarinic receptors. Both of these types of cholinergic receptors are heterogeneous. They have yet to be investigated for their subtypes using specific agonists and antagonists. Although the role of cholinergic retinal neurons in the processing of visual information is not known, their input to ganglion cells generally increases the rate of spontaneous activity or the number of action potentials in light-evoked responses. Thus, the cholinergic input seems to modify the overall neuronal input to the ganglion cells from the receptive fields. Endothelial cells of blood vessels contain muscarinic receptors, which are activated by ACh to cause relaxation. Although retinal blood vessels provide recognizable characteristic signs in diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disease, no information is available on the muscarinic receptors of these vessels.

Increase in muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in mouse intestine by hexamethonium treatment

The effects of hexamethonium (C6) administration on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mACh-R) in the intestine and brain of mice were investigated. Mice were treated with C6 with an osmotic mini-pump (330 mg/kg/day) for one week and then the binding of 3H-quinuclidinylbenzilate (3H-QNB) in the intestine and brain were assayed. This treatment increased the maximum specific binding (Bmax) of 3H-QNB from 160 to 320 fmoles/mg protein in the ileum and from 190 to 340 fmoles/mg protein in the rectum, without affecting the KD values in these regions. On the contrary, C6 treatment did not change the Bmax or KD value in brain tissues. This C6 treatment increased the sensitivity of the contractile response of the intestine to muscarinic agonists, possibly by increasing mACh-R.

Identification of muscarinic receptors in rat cerebral cortical microvessels

Microvessels isolated from rat cerebral cortex consist mainly of capillaries (greater than 85%). Fresh, intact microvessel preparations have been analyzed by radioligand binding techniques for muscarinic receptors. Scatchard analysis of specific quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) binding indicates that microvessels possess a large number of muscarinic sites (914 fmol/mg protein) of high affinity (KD = 0.034 nM). The association and dissociation rate constants (0.37 min-1 nM-1 and 0.0067 min-1, respectively) yield an equilibrium KD of 0.018 nM. Displacement of [3H]QNB by muscarinic ligands and control substances is typical of muscarinic receptors. The results indicate that cerebral microvessels possess a large population of muscarinic receptors.

Distribution of (3H)QNB binding in dog gastric smooth muscle pre- and post vagotomy

Tritiated quinuclidinyl benzilate [(3H) QNB] was used to characterize muscarinic cholinergic receptors in membrane fragments prepared from the circular smooth muscle of the dog stomach. In preliminary experiments the effect of protein, incubation time, temperature and pH on QNB binding were evaluated. Muscarinic cholinergic antagonists and agonists inhibited QNB binding in a concentration-dependent manner, but the nicotinic antagonist hexamethonium and adrenergic compounds were not effective in displacing QNB from binding sites. Scatchard plot analysis of binding data showed an asymmetric receptor distribution in the stomach. The cardia bound 425fmol of QNB/mg protein with a Kd of 0.05nM, the fundus 267fmol/mg protein with a Kd of 0.09nM and the antrum 147 fmol/mg protein with a Kd of 0.14nM. In a second series of experiments, binding of QNB was measured in dogs which had been vagotomized three weeks earlier. Vagotomy had no effect on the apparent Kd but disrupted the asymmetric receptor distribution seen in the normal dog such that the Bmax of the cardia fell to a value of 222fmol/mg protein.

Correlations between acetylcholinesterase activity in guinea-pig iris and pupillary function: a biochemical and pupillographic study

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in guinea pig iris was inhibited by methylisocyclopentylfluorophosphate (soman) administered topically or parenterally, and enzyme activity was correlated to pupillary diameter by infrared pupillography. After a single topical soman instillation into the conjunctival sac there was an almost linear relationship between the reduction in AChE activity and pupillary diameter. Topical administration of soman at 24-h intervals in doses capable of almost complete inhibition of AChE in iris was accompanied by a reduced miotic effect of this drug. This was indicated by a reduced rate of the soman-induced pupillary constriction, a less pronounced reduction in pupillary diameter, and a more rapid return of the pupillary diameter to normal size. The change in pupillary diameter occurred after three daily administrations and remained constant during 31 days of treatment. These observations were seen irrespective of inhibition of blood AChE. The decrease in response to repeated administration could not be explained by a reduced inhibitory effect of soman on AChE, by a more rapid de novo synthesis of AChE, or by a change in the number of the muscarinic receptors as determined by quinuclidinyl benzilate binding. When soman or DFP was administered subcutaneously in high doses a severe AChE inhibition was obtained in iris without any concomitant miosis.