Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein alters the structure of intramolecular triplexes in plasmids

Interaction in vitro of type III intermediate filament proteins with triplex DNA

As previously shown, type III intermediate filaments (IFs) select from a mixture of linear mouse genomic DNA fragments mobile and repetitive, recombinogenic sequences that have also been identified in SDS-stable crosslinkage products of vimentin and DNA isolated from intact fibroblasts. Because these sequences also included homopurine.homopyrimidine (Pu.Py) tracts known to adopt triple-helical conformation under superhelical tension, and because IF proteins are single-stranded (ss) and supercoiled DNA-binding proteins, it was of interest whether they have a particular affinity for triplex DNA. To substantiate this, IF-selected DNA fragments harboring a (Pu.Py) segment and synthetic d(GA)(n) microsatellites were inserted into a vector plasmid and the constructs analyzed for their capacity to interact with IF proteins. Band shift assays revealed a substantially higher affinity of the IF proteins for the insert-containing plasmids than for the empty vector, with an activity decreasing in the order of vimentin > glial fibrillary acidic protein > desmin. In addition, footprint analyses performed with S1 nuclease, KMnO(4), and OsO(4)/bipyridine showed that the (Pu.Py) inserts had adopted triplex conformation under the superhelical strain of the plasmids, and that the IF proteins protected the triple-helical insert sequences from nucleolytic cleavage and chemical modification. All these activities were largely reduced in extent when analyzed on linearized plasmid DNAs. Because intramolecular triplexes (H-DNA) expose single-stranded loops, and the prokaryotic ssDNA-binding proteins g5p and g32p also protected at least the Pu-strand of the (Pu.Py) inserts from nucleolytic degradation, it seemed likely that the IF proteins take advantage of their ssDNA-binding activity in interacting with H-DNA. However, in contrast to g5p and E. coli SSB, they produced no clear band shifts with single-stranded d(GA)(20) and d(TC)(20), so that the interactions rather appear to occur via the duplex-triplex and triplex-loop junctions of H-DNA. On the other hand, the IF proteins, and also g32p, promoted the formation of intermolecular triplexes from the duplex d[A(GA)(20).(TC)(20)T] and d(GA)(20) and d(TC)(20) single strands, with preference of the Py (Pu.Py) triplex motif, substantiating an affinity of the proteins for the triplex structure as such. This triplex-stabilizing effect of IF proteins also applies to the H-DNA of (Pu.Py) insert-containing plasmids, as demonstrated by the preservation of intramolecular triplex-vimentin complexes upon linearization of their constituent supercoiled DNAs, in contrast to poor complex formation from free, linearized plasmid DNA and vimentin. Considering that (Pu.Py) sequences are found near MAR/replication origins, in upstream enhancer and promoter regions of genes, and in recombination hot spots, these results might point to roles of IF proteins in DNA replication, transcription, recombination, and repair.

Sticky DNA: self-association properties of long GAA.TTC repeats in R.R.Y triplex structures from Friedreich's ataxia

A novel DNA structure, sticky DNA, is described for lengths of (GAA.TTC)n found in intron 1 of the frataxin gene of Friedreich's ataxia patients. Sticky DNA is formed by the association of two purine.purine.pyrimidine (R.R.Y) triplexes in negatively supercoiled plasmids at neutral pH. An excellent correlation was found between the lengths of (GAA.TTC) (> 59 repeats): first, in FRDA patients, second, required to inhibit transcription in vivo and in vitro, and third, required to adopt the sticky conformation. Fourth, (GAAGGA.TCCTTC)65, also found in intron 1, does not form sticky DNA, inhibit transcription, or associate with the disease. Hence, R.R.Y triplexes and/or sticky DNA may be involved in the etiology of FRDA.

Stabilization of intramolecular triple/single-strand structure by cationic peptides

For better comprehension of possible physiological roles of triple-helical DNA structures, it is important to understand if the proteins can stabilize intramolecular triplex (H-DNA). One plausible mode of stabilization is through the neutralization of electrostatic repulsion of negatively charged phosphates in the three DNA strands by positively charged arginine and lysine residues of a bound protein. To gain an insight into interactions between H-DNA and cationic protein domains, we examined the effect of Lys- and Arg-rich oligopeptides on the B-DNA to H-DNA transition. These oligopeptides as well as another type of polycation, spermine, shifted the equilibrium toward H-DNA. These polycations introduced little change in DNA superhelicity, so that an increase in torsional stress was not responsible for facilitated H-DNA formation. Competing influences of polycations and monovalent cations suggest a significant involvement of electrostatic interactions in H-DNA stabilization. The Arg-rich peptides are more effective in H-DNA stabilization than the Lys-rich ones. However, as inferred from experiments on intermolecular complexes, this is not due to a better stabilization of triple helix or destabilization of double helix. It is possible that Arg-rich peptides interact with the unpaired single strand in H-DNA and stabilize its unpaired conformation.

Cruciform-extruding regulatory element controls cell-specific activity of the tyrosine hydroxylase gene promoter

Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is expressed specifically in catecholaminergic cells. We have identified a novel regulatory sequence in the upstream region of the bovine TH gene promoter formed by a dyad symmetry element (DSE1;-352/-307 bp). DSE1 supports TH promoter activity in TH-expressing bovine adrenal medulla chromaffin (BAMC) cells and inhibits promoter activity in non-expressing TE671 cells. DNase I footprinting of relaxed TH promoter DNA showed weak binding of nuclear BAMC cell proteins to a short sequence in the right DSE1 arm. In BAMC cells, deletion of the right arm markedly reduced the expression of luciferase from the TH promoter. However, deletion of the left DSE1 arm or its reversed orientation (RevL) also inactivated the TH promoter. In supercoiled TH promoter, DSE1 assumes a cruciform-like conformation i.e., it binds cruciform-specific 2D3 antibody, and S1 nuclease-cleavage and OsO4-modification assays have identified an imperfect cruciform extruded by the DSE1. DNase I footprinting of supercoiled plasmid showed that cruciformed DSE1 is targeted by nuclear proteins more efficiently than the linear duplex isomer and that the protected site encompasses the left arm and center of DSE1. Our results suggest that the disruption of intrastrand base-pairing preventing cruciform formation and protein binding to DSE1 is responsible for its inactivation in DSE1 mutants. DSE1 cruciform may act as a target site for activator (BAMC cells) and repressor (TE671) proteins. Its extrusion emerges as a novel mechanism that controls cell-specific promoter activity.

Functional domains of Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein as assessed by analyses of the deletion mutants

A series of C- and N-terminal deletion mutants of Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) was constructed, purified, and characterized in terms of ability to self-multimerize and to bind to DNA. High-performance gel filtration chromatography revealed that the amino acids 89-105 play a key role in the maintenance of homotetramer for native SSB of 177 amino acids. Interestingly, all of the N-terminal deletion mutants studied here were eluted as octamers, indicating that the N-terminal 11 residues are involved in the prevention of the formation of octamers. The binding of SSB and its deletion mutant proteins to single-stranded d(T)n was examined by gel mobility shift assay and circular dichroism spectroscopy. C-terminal deletion mutant proteins, SSB1-135 and SSB1-115, maintained high affinity and may be wrapped by single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in the same way as in the case of native SSB. In contrast, deletion of the C-terminal region (residues 89-115) or N-terminal region (residues 1-11) caused a dramatic decrease in the binding affinity. Furthermore, two different stoichiometries of SSB in the complexes with d(T)64, but not with d(T)32, were observed for native SSB, SSB1-135, SSB1-115, and SSB37-177, suggesting that the (SSB)65 and (SSB)35 binding modes, as previously demonstrated [Lohman, T. M., & Overman, L. B. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3594-3603; Bujalowski, W., & Lohman, T. M. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 7799-7802], occurred at lower and higher SSB concentrations, respectively. A functional map for SSB molecule was presented and discussed.