Systemic and hepatic hemodynamics after variceal hemorrhage: effects of propranolol and placebo

Heterogeneity of treatment response to beta-blockers in the treatment of portal hypertension: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that a relevant proportion of patients do not respond to nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB)s, which raises questions regarding the need for individualized therapy. The existence of potential heterogeneity in the treatment response can be assessed using the variability ratio (VR) of the outcome measurement (in this case, HVPG) between the treated and placebo groups. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the potential heterogeneity in the portal pressure response to NSBBs.

METHODS

After a systematic search, we quantified the heterogeneity of treatment response with the VR between the treatment and control groups, with VR > 1 indicating potential heterogeneity. We used a similar approach to compare carvedilol with propranolol and statins with placebo.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies that included 965 patients. A comparison between beta-blockers and placebo showed a pooled VR of 0.99 (95% CI:0.87-1.14), which suggests a homogeneous HVPG response to NSBB at the individual patient level (ie, no evidence to support that some patients responded to beta-blockers and others did not). For the comparison between carvedilol and propranolol, pooled VR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.82-1.14), suggesting that carvedilol achieves a greater average response (rather than an increase in the proportion of responders). There was no evidence of a heterogeneous response to statins.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis did not support the existence of a heterogeneous patient-by-patient response to NSBBs in cirrhosis. These findings challenge the concept of personalized therapy based on portal pressure response and indicate that routine portal pressure measurement may not be necessary to guide NSBB therapy.

Test-Retest Reliability and Consistency of HVPG and Impact on Trial Design: A Study in 289 Patients from 20 Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Portal hypertension (PH) is a major driver for cirrhosis complications. Portal pressure is estimated in practice by the HVPG. The assessment of HVPG changes has been used for drug development in PH. This study aimed at quantifying the test-retest reliability and consistency of HVPG in the specific context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of PH in cirrhosis and its impact on power calculations for trial design.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted a search of published RCTs in patients with cirrhosis reporting individual patient-level data of HVPG at baseline and after an intervention, which included a placebo or an untreated control arm. Baseline and follow-up HVPGs in the control groups were extracted after digitizing the plots. We assessed reliability and consistency and the potential impact of study characteristics. We retrieved a total of 289 before and after HVPG measurements in the placebo/untreated groups from 20 RCTs. The time span between the two HVPG measurements ranged between 20 minutes and 730 days. Pre-/post-HVPG variability was lower in studies including only compensated patients; therefore, modeled sample size calculations for trials in compensated cirrhosis were lower than for decompensated cirrhosis. A higher proportion of alcohol-associated cirrhosis and unicentric trials was associated with lower differences between baseline and follow-up measurements. The smallest detectable difference in an individual was 26% and 30% in compensated and decompensated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The test-retest reliability of HVPG is overall excellent. Within-individual variance was higher in studies including higher proportions of decompensated patients. These findings should be taken into account when performing power analysis for trials based on the effects on HVPG or when considering HVPG as a tool to guide therapy of PH.

Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% to 95% of people with cirrhosis have oesophageal varices. About 15% to 20% of oesophageal varices bleed in about one to three years of diagnosis. Several different treatments are available, which include endoscopic sclerotherapy, variceal band ligation, beta-blockers, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and surgical portocaval shunts, among others. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their individual and relative benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different initial treatments for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for secondary prevention according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until December 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and a previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had no previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices, previous history of bleeding only from gastric varices, those who failed previous treatment (refractory bleeding), those who had acute bleeding at the time of treatment, and those who had previously undergone liver transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the differences in treatments using hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR) and rate ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 48 randomised clinical trials (3526 participants) in the review. Forty-six trials (3442 participants) were included in one or more comparisons. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies. The follow-up ranged from two months to 61 months. All the trials were at high risk of bias. A total of 12 interventions were compared in these trials (sclerotherapy, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy, no active intervention, TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt), beta-blockers plus nitrates, portocaval shunt, sclerotherapy plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus nitrates plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy plus nitrates). Overall, 22.5% of the trial participants who received the reference treatment (chosen because this was the commonest treatment compared in the trials) of sclerotherapy died during the follow-up period ranging from two months to 61 months. There was considerable uncertainty in the effects of interventions on mortality. Accordingly, none of the interventions showed superiority over another. None of the trials reported health-related quality of life. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation may result in fewer serious adverse events (number of people) than sclerotherapy (OR 0.19; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.54; 1 trial; 100 participants). Based on low or very low-certainty evidence, the adverse events (number of participants) and adverse events (number of events) may be different across many comparisons; however, these differences are due to very small trials at high risk of bias showing large differences in some comparisons leading to many differences despite absence of direct evidence. Based on low-certainty evidence, TIPS may result in large decrease in symptomatic rebleed than variceal band ligation (HR 0.12; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.41; 1 trial; 58 participants). Based on moderate-certainty evidence, any variceal rebleed was probably lower in sclerotherapy than in no active intervention (HR 0.62; 95% CrI 0.35 to 0.99, direct comparison HR 0.66; 95% CrI 0.11 to 3.13; 3 trials; 296 participants), beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy than sclerotherapy alone (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.37 to 0.95; direct comparison HR 0.50; 95% CrI 0.07 to 2.96; 4 trials; 231 participants); TIPS than sclerotherapy (HR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.08 to 0.38; direct comparison HR 0.22; 95% CrI 0.01 to 7.51; 2 trials; 109 participants), and in portocaval shunt than sclerotherapy (HR 0.21; 95% CrI 0.05 to 0.77; no direct comparison) groups. Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers alone and TIPS might result in more, other compensation, events than sclerotherapy (rate ratio 2.37; 95% CrI 1.35 to 4.67; 1 trial; 65 participants and rate ratio 2.30; 95% CrI 1.20 to 4.65; 2 trials; 109 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions including those related to beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation in the remaining comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions on mortality. Variceal band ligation might result in fewer serious adverse events than sclerotherapy. TIPS might result in a large decrease in symptomatic rebleed than variceal band ligation. Sclerotherapy probably results in fewer 'any' variceal rebleeding than no active intervention. Beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy and TIPS probably result in fewer 'any' variceal rebleeding than sclerotherapy. Beta-blockers alone and TIPS might result in more other compensation events than sclerotherapy. The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in the remaining comparisons. Accordingly, high-quality randomised comparative clinical trials are needed.

Quantitative modeling of the physiology of ascites in portal hypertension

Although the factors involved in cirrhotic ascites have been studied for a century, a number of observations are not understood, including the action of diuretics in the treatment of ascites and the ability of the plasma-ascitic albumin gradient to diagnose portal hypertension. This communication presents an explanation of ascites based solely on pathophysiological alterations within the peritoneal cavity. A quantitative model is described based on experimental vascular and intraperitoneal pressures, lymph flow, and peritoneal space compliance. The model's predictions accurately mimic clinical observations in ascites, including the magnitude and time course of changes observed following paracentesis or diuretic therapy.

Hepatic venous pressure in practice: how, when, and why

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement has evolved into an extremely useful procedure for the assessment of portal hypertensive patients and in the prediction and management of portal hypertension-related events. Although invasive and not widely available, its safety and reproducibility can be warranted when performed in referral centers and following accepted guidelines. Well-established manometric HVPG cut off are reliable targets in the therapy of portal hypertension. When adequately indicated and performed, HVPG measurement provides valuable information allowing to establish diagnosis, elaborate prognosis, evaluate therapy and, most importantly, to make therapeutic decisions in portal hypertensive patients.

A 3-month course of long-acting repeatable octreotide (sandostatin LAR) improves portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

In patients with cirrhosis, acute octreotide administration may transiently decrease the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Information on long-term effects of octreotide is limited and controversial. We evaluated portal and systemic hemodynamics following a prolonged administration of long-acting octreotide in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Eighteen cirrhotic patients (alcoholic 12; age 55 yr [44-69]; Pugh's score 7.8; HVPG 17.3 mmHg [12-22]), no steatohepatitis on histology, were randomized to intramuscular octreotide 20 mg (group A) q 4 wk for 3 months or placebo (group B) in a double-blind fashion. At baseline and 3 months, we measured the HVPG, systemic hemodynamics, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in hepatic venous blood.

RESULTS

Patients remained compensated except for one episode of infection in each group. At 3 months, the HVPG decreased in group A but not in group B (16.5 +/- 1.3 to 11.8 +/- 1.5 mmHg, P < 0.01; 18.2 +/- 1 to 17 +/- 1.1 mmHg, P= 0.4). Systemic hemodynamics and liver function remained unchanged. In group A, but not in group B, VEGF decreased (21.2 +/- 4.7 to 13.7 +/- 3.5 pg/mL, P < 0.01; 22.5 +/- 7.8 to 19.2 +/- 5.4 pg/mL, P= 0.4). ET-1 remained stable. Changes in HVPG and VEGF were correlated (r = 0.49, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of long-acting octreotide in selected cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension decreases the HVPG independent of systemic hemodynamics and liver function. The decrease in VEGF blood levels suggests an improvement in splanchnic hyperemia.

Per rectal portal scintigraphy as a useful tool for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients

AIM: To investigate potential roles of per rectal portal scintigraphy in diagnosis of esophageal varices and predicting the risk of bleeding.

METHODS: Fifteen normal subjects and fifty cirrhotic patients with endoscopically confirmed esophageal varices were included. Patients were categorized into bleeder and non-bleeder groups according to history of variceal bleeding. All had completed per rectal portal scintigraphy using ^99mTechnetium pertechnetate. The shunt index was calculated from the ratio of ^99mTechnetium pertechnetate in the heart and the liver. Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test and receiver operating characteristics.

RESULTS: Cirrhotic patients showed a higher shunt index than normal subjects (63.80 ± 25.21 vs 13.54 ± 6.46, P < 0.01). Patients with variceal bleeding showed a higher shunt index than those without bleeding (78.45 ± 9.40 vs 49.35 ± 27.72, P < 0.01). A shunt index of over 20% indicated the presence of varices and that of over 60% indicated the risk of variceal bleeding.

CONCLUSION: In cirrhotic patients, per rectal portal scintigraphy is a clinically useful test for identifying esophageal varices and risk of variceal bleeding.

Sustained rise of portal pressure after sclerotherapy, but not band ligation, in acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis

During variceal bleeding, several factors may increase portal pressure, which in turn may precipitate further bleeding. This study investigates the early effects of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) and endoscopic band ligation (EBL) on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) during acute bleeding and the possible influence in outcome. In 50 cirrhotic patients with bleeding esophageal varices treated with EIS (n = 25) or EBL (n = 25), we performed repeated HVPG measurements before and immediately after endoscopic treatment (time 0) and every 24 hours for a 5-day period. Endotherapy was continued until the varices were too small for further treatment. Both groups were comparable with regard to age, gender, Child-Turcotte-Pugh grade, and HVPG. In the EBL and EIS groups, a significant (P <.0001) increase was observed in mean portal pressure (20.7 mm Hg +/- 4.4 SD and 21.5 mm Hg +/- 4.5 SD, respectively) immediately after treatment (time 0) as compared with pretreatment (18.1 +/- 4.5 and 18.1 +/- 4.0). However, HVPG in the EBL group returned to baseline values within 48 hours after treatment, while in the EIS group it remained high during the 120-hour study period (P <.0001). Bleeding stopped in all patients after endotherapy. During the 42-day follow-up period, the rebleeding rate over time was lower in the EBL group compared with the EIS group (P =.024). Patients with an initial HVPG greater than 16 mm Hg had, despite endoscopic treatment, a significantly higher likelihood of death (P =.024) and overall failure (P =.037) [correction]. In conclusion, during acute variceal bleeding EIS, but not EBL, causes a sustained increase in HVPG, which is followed by a higher rebleeding rate.

Management of portal hypertension after variceal hemorrhage

Each variceal bleed is associated with 20% to 30% risk of dying. Management of portal hypertension after a bleed consists of (1) control of bleeding and (2) prevention of rebleeding. Effective control of bleeding can be achieved either pharmacologically by administering somatostatin or octreotide or endoscopically via sclerotherapy or variceal band ligation. In practice, both pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy are used concomitantly. Rebleeding can be prevented by endoscopic obliteration of varices. In this setting, variceal ligation is the preferred endoscopic modality. B-blockade is as effective as endoscopic therapy and, in combination, the two modalities may be additive.

Esophageal varices. I. Clinical presentation, medical therapy, and endoscopic therapy

The last half century has witnessed great advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of portal hypertension in cirrhotics. Several pharmacologic and endoscopic techniques have been developed for the treatment of portal hypertension. The use of these agents in a given patient must be based on an understanding of the stage in the natural history of the disease and the relative efficacy and safety of the available treatment options.

Wedged hepatic venous pressure adequately reflects portal pressure in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis

Wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) is equivalent to portal venous pressure in patients with alcoholic liver diseases. However, it may underestimate portal pressure in nonalcoholics, which is important because hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a frequent cause of chronic liver disease. We investigated the agreement between directly measured portal pressure and WHVP in alcoholic and HCV-related liver diseases. Seventy-one patients with liver disease resulting from HCV infection (n = 32), alcohol (n = 25), or both (n = 14) underwent simultaneous measurements of WHVP (by hepatic vein catheterization) and portal pressure (by direct puncture). In 9 patients, measurements were repeated 20 minutes after acute iv propranolol administration. WHVP showed an excellent agreement with portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis resulting from either HCV, alcohol or both (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.94, 0.93, and 0.97, respectively; P <.001). A discrepancy of >/=5 mm Hg was observed in 7 cases. WHVP underestimated portal pressure in only 1 case and exceeded portal pressure by >/=5 mm Hg in 6 patients. The WHVP response to propranolol closely and significantly correlated with changes in portal pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.87; P <.004). The simple and safe measurement of WHVP accurately reflects portal pressure in alcoholic and HCV-related liver disease. This technique also allows us to accurately assess the portal pressure response to propranolol in both alcoholic and HCV-related cirrhosis.

Effects of endoscopic variceal ligation on oxygen transport and the arterial lactate levels in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the increased cardiac output and oxygen delivery, an impaired oxygen uptake has been noted in patients with cirrhosis. We recently observed that endoscopic variceal ligation decreased the cardiac output due to a reduction in the cardiac preload. It is thus possible that a variceal ligation decreases the oxygen delivery and thereby negatively influences tissue oxygenation in patients receiving such treatment. We thus investigated the effects of variceal ligation on oxygen delivery, oxygen uptake, and the arterial lactate levels.

METHODS

There were 22 patients with compensated cirrhosis and risky esophageal varices (Child's class A:B=13:9). Twelve patients underwent an endoscopic variceal ligation and 10 patients received gastroscopy as a control. The cardiac function, blood gas status, oxygen delivery, and arterial lactate concentration were also assessed before and after variceal ligation. The oxygen uptake was calculated by the Fick equation.

RESULTS

Following variceal ligation, there was an immediate decrease in the cardiac output and oxygen delivery. The reduction in oxygen delivery was associated with a slight but significant increase in the arterial lactate concentration. The decreased oxygen delivery was also associated with a concomitant decrease in the oxygen uptake. In the control subjects, gastroscopy did not alter the systemic hemodynamics, arterial oxygen status, or arterial lactate levels.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant decrease in the oxygen delivery in patients undergoing an endoscopic variceal ligation. Such deteriorated tissue oxygenation may be serious especially in patients with a low oxygen transport ability such as in patients with variceal hemorrhage with anemia. However, the clinical significance of these changes remains unclear and further studies are therefore warranted.

Relationship between portal pressure, esophageal varices, and variceal bleeding on the basis of the stage and cause of cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Hepatic venous pressure gradient, esophageal varices, and variceal bleeding were investigated in 957 patients with cirrhosis. The causes (alcoholic/virus) and stage (Child-Pugh's classification) of cirrhosis were also taken into account.

RESULTS

The prevalence of variceal bleeding was 35% in patients with large varices and 17% in those with small varices (P < 0.05). It was higher in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (41% and 19%, respectively) than in those with viral cirrhosis (22% and 10%, respectively). In patients with alcoholic cirrhosis the hepatic venous pressure gradient was higher in Child A and B patients with small or large varices than in those with no varices; these differences were not found in Child C patients and in patients with viral cirrhosis. In all subgroups the pressure gradient was higher in Child C patients than in Child A patients. There was no significant difference in the hepatic venous pressure gradient between patients with varices and previous variceal bleeding and those with no bleeding whatever the stage of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the hepatic venous pressure gradient is associated with the stage and causes of cirrhosis and the presence of varices. These factors should be taken into account in studies evaluating the hepatic venous pressure gradient in heterogeneous groups of patients.

Effects of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy on azygos vein blood flow and systemic haemodynamics

The present study was designed to determine the systemic haemodynamic effects of obliterating oesophageal varices by endoscopic sclerotherapy. We evaluated systemic and splanchnic haemodynamics before and after the first course of sclerotherapy in cirrhotic patients. The baseline cardiac index was significantly correlated with baseline azygos vein blood flow (r = 0.64; P < 0.01) and the azygos vein blood flow and cardiac index significantly decreased (-33% and -16%, respectively; P < 0.01) following sclerotherapy. The systemic vascular resistance index was also increased significantly (+ 20%; P < 0.01) in these patients. Moreover, the per cent change in azygos vein blood flow was directly correlated with that of the cardiac index (r = 0.51; P < 0.03). We conclude from these findings that the obliteration of portosystemic collaterals by sclerotherapy significantly reverses hyperdynamic circulation in such patients via a decrease in cardiac preload. The blood flow of the portosystemic shunt per se is a leading contributor to the hyperdynamic circulation observed in patients with well-developed portal systemic collateral vessels.

The impact of endoscopic variceal ligation on the pressure of the portal venous system

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic variceal ligation is a viable substitute for injection sclerotherapy. It is still not known how endoscopic variceal ligation may influence the portal venous system. To clarify this issue we investigated the impact of endoscopic variceal ligation on the pressure of the portal venous system.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with a history of esophageal variceal bleeding but without ascites were enrolled. All had cirrhosis; 63% of them were post-hepatitic. Ligation was performed at intervals of 2-3 weeks until all the varices were obliterated. Portal venograms were performed before institution of ligation and after variceal obliteration to assess venographic findings and pressure changes. The pressures of the main portal vein, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients completed the study. A mean of 4.4 sessions (range: 2-7) of ligation over a period of 2 months was needed. Seventeen (68%) patients experienced elevated pressure and eight (32%) patients reduced pressure after ligation. Mean (median) pressure changes were as follows: portal venous pressure, 26.5 +/- 4.7 (25.0) mmHg vs. 28.2 +/- 7.2 (28.0) mmHg (p > 0.05); splenic venous pressure, 28.2 +/- 4.9 (26.0) mmHg vs. 29.0 +/- 6.8 (29.0) mmHg (p > 0.05); superior mesenteric venous pressure, 28.4 +/- 6.0 (27.0) mmHg vs. 29.5 +/- 7.0 (29.0) mmHg (p > 0.05). Five patients (20%) experienced rebleeding before variceal obliteration; all of them presented elevated portal pressures after variceal obliteration. Among the eight patients with decreased portal pressure, seven (87%) had other major collaterals apart from esophageal varices, compared to three out of the 17 (18%) patients with elevated portal pressure who had other major collaterals (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients receiving endoscopic variceal ligation, 68% experienced elevated portal pressure, while 32% had decreased portal pressure. Elevation of portal pressure after variceal ligation may be an important factor in variceal rebleeding. The presence of other major collaterals apart from esophageal varices may be responsible for the decrease in portal pressure after obliteration of esophagel varices.

Why portal hypertensive varices bleed and bleed: a hypothesis

Continued bleeding or early rebleeding is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with variceal haemorrhage. It is not clear why bleeding stops in some patients and continues or restarts in others. It is suggested that secondary haemodynamic changes in the splanchnic circulation after a bleed may contribute to the risk of further bleeding. These changes include the effects of hypotension on portocollateral resistance, the effects of blood in the gut on splanchnic blood flow, and the effects of blood volume expansion on portal venous pressure during resuscitation. These factors, working in concert, cause a secondary rise in portal venous pressure, which may precipitate further bleeding. Treatment aimed at preventing these secondary haemodynamic changes may be beneficial. It is probable that somatostatin and octreotide could act in this way, which may explain their therapeutic efficacy.

Wedged hepatic venous pressure reflects portal venous pressure during vasoactive drug administration in nonalcoholic cirrhosis

Hepatic venous catheterization is widely used to assess portal pressure. However, it remains unclear whether wedged hepatic venous pressure is a close indicator of portal venous pressure during vasoactive drug administration in nonalcoholic cirrhosis. To address this issue, we analyzed the data from our previous published studies. Forty patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis (HBV infection in five, HCV infection in 28, and cryptogenic in seven) were available in this analysis. A vasoconstrictor (N = 14), vasodilator (N = 10), or combination (N = 16) was administered. The agreement of the changes between portal and wedged hepatic venous pressures during pharmacological manipulation was assessed by an intraclass correlation coefficient. The intraclass correlation coefficient in each subgroup was more than 0.60 (0.62 in vasoconstrictor group, 0.87 in vasodilator group, and 0.73 in combination group). When the analysis was performed according to the cause of liver disease, the values were 0.67 in HBV infection, 0.73 in HCV infection, and 0.74 in cryptogenic cirrhosis. These results suggest that wedged hepatic venous pressure reflects portal venous pressure during vasoactive drug administration in patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis.

Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: hemodynamic effects and prevention of bleeding

In the past 10 years, it has been clearly shown that vasoactive substances reduce portal pressure in patients or animals with portal hypertension. Some of these substances act by inducing splanchnic vasoconstriction, while others reduce hepatic and porto-systemic collateral vascular resistance and, thus, induce a portal hypotensive effect. Still others induce arterial hypotension, which causes a vasoconstrictive effect in the splanchnic territory. Since these drugs act on different vascular receptors, their combination should have a more marked effect on portal hypertension. Up to now, only nonselective beta-blockers have been used in the prevention of first gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices and in the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. These trials have shown that propranolol or nadolol significantly reduce either a first episode of bleeding or recurrent bleeding. This pharmacological treatment also improves the survival rate in these patients. All of these studies have helped us to understand, in part, why gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurs in certain patients. Additional studies of beta-blockers or other substances are, nevertheless, necessary to select patients who will respond to this type of treatment. Finally, it is possible that the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension may also be used before esophageal varices occur.

Echo-Doppler evaluation of acute flow changes in portal hypertensive patients: flow velocity as a reliable parameter

In order to evaluate the behavior of the portal vein cross-sectional area during changes in portal flow, two groups of subjects were analyzed in two blinded cross-over studies using echo-Doppler flowmetry. The first group (I) consisted of 21 patients with cirrhosis and 16 controls. They received a standardized meal which is known to increase portal flow. The second group (II) consisted of 31 patients with cirrhosis who received a dose of propranolol which is known to decrease portal flow. In Group I, 30 min after the meal, the portal vein blood velocity increased by 35 +/- 6% (p less than 0.01) in cirrhotic patients and by 55 +/- 5% (p less than 0.01), in normal subjects. The portal vein cross-sectional area increased significantly in normal subjects (22 +/- 2%, p less than 0.01) but not in cirrhotic patients (4 +/- 2%, n.s.). In Group II, 2 h after propranolol, there was a significant decrease in portal blood velocity (-14 +/- 2%), whereas the portal vein cross-sectional area did not show any significant changes. These data demonstrate that, in portal hypersensitive patients, the portal area measured by echo-Doppler flowmetry can be assumed to be constant and hence its calculation to estimate changes in portal blood flow can be omitted. Therefore, the use of blood velocity alone is suggested to monitor acute changes in flow in portal hypertension using Doppler flowmetry. The elimination of the portal vein cross-sectional area measurement simplifies the quantitative calculation of portal hemodynamics and increases the reliability of the technique by avoiding a source of error.

Long-term effects of oral propranolol on splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices

Splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics were measured in 24 patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices and no previous bleeding. The patients were randomized either to long-term treatment with propranolol (14 patients) or no active treatment (controls, 10 patients). Catheterization was performed again 1 year after randomization. After 1 year of treatment the hepatic venous pressure gradient had decreased in both the propranolol and control group (-16% versus -24% (NS), respectively). Hepatic blood flow decreased substantially in both groups but significantly more in the propranolol group (-39% versus -17% (p less than 0.05), respectively). Azygos blood flow was significantly reduced after 1 year in the propranolol group (-47%, n = 5 (p less than 0.05)), and no obvious effect was observed in the control group (-2%, n = 4). The cardiac index decreased significantly in the propranolol group but not in the control group (-20% versus -1% (p less than 0.05), respectively). Our results demonstrate that the splanchnic hyperdynamic condition observed in cirrhosis is in some of the patients partly reversible without pharmacologic treatment. No additional effect of propranolol was observed on portal pressure after 1 year of treatment with propranolol, whereas a decrease in azygos blood flow was observed only in the propranolol group. The beneficial effect of propranolol on the risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices may, therefore, mostly be due to a selective decrease in collateral blood flow and thereby variceal blood flow.

Current status and future goals of the pharmacologic reduction of portal hypertension

The continuous oral administration of different drugs can produce a sustained reduction in portal pressure in patients with portal hypertension. beta-Adrenergic antagonists, alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, and 5-hydroxytryptamine-receptor antagonists have been evaluated for their long-term effects on portal pressure reduction. Clinical studies show that gastrointestinal bleeding can be prevented by pharmacologic therapy. This type of treatment is efficient and safe, and, if a drug has no clinical effect, a different drug or a combination can be used. Several problems, however, need to be addressed, including patient compliance, selection of responders, and hemodynamic evaluation of the treatment and its duration. Although pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension is known to be efficient, there are advances still to be made.

Long-term pharmacologic therapy of portal hypertension

Beta-blockers modify splanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients. Nonselective beta-blockers are more effective than selective beta-blockers. Azygos blood flow, as a measure of collateral circulation, including that through varices, is always reduced, but the effects on portal pressure, whether measured directly or by the wedged hepatic venous pressure, are variable. The initial reported correlation between a 25% reduction of resting pulse rate and similar percentage reduction in the wedged free hepatic venous gradient has not been reproduced in subsequent studies. Therefore, to study the effect of changes in hemodynamic indices and the likelihood of variceal bleeding, direct measurements of such indices need to be made in clinical trials. At present, only one primary-prevention trial of propranolol suggests that a hemodynamic index can be used to identify patients given propranolol who will not bleed. Some clinical factors may be important in identifying nonresponders in trials of secondary prevention, but these are not universally recognized. The results of secondary-prevention studies are very heterogeneous, and it is difficult to understand why this is so. However, comparative studies versus sclerotherapy suggest that reductions in rebleeding and mortality are similar. Pharmacologic treatment, including beta-blockade, is ideal for primary prevention of variceal bleeding. The initial results from randomized studies are more homogeneous regarding the benefit of beta-blockers than in the secondary-prevention studies, although there is still doubt about the response in cirrhotics with ascites. No fatal complications due to propranolol administration have been reported in cirrhotic patients, and the complications are reversible. The future of pharmacologic therapy for portal hypertension lies in combination therapy. The addition of vasodilators to beta-blockers appears to potentiate their effect on portal pressure reduction. The results of clinical trials are awaited with great interest.

Propranolol in the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. A controlled trial

A double-blind controlled study of long-acting propranolol in the secondary prevention of variceal hemorrhage was conducted in 81 cirrhotic patients. After the index hemorrhage, all patients were treated with injection sclerotherapy on one occasion to secure hemostasis and then randomized within 72 h to propranolol or placebo therapy which was continued for 2 yr. Study endpoints were severe recurrence of variceal hemorrhage or death. Forty-two patients did not fulfill the entry criteria for the study. Thirty-eight patients received propranolol of whom 18 (47%) had further hemorrhage, 14 died, eight had side-effects (2 withdrawals), and 3 did not complete follow-up. Forty-three patients received placebo of whom 33 (77%) had further hemorrhage, 19 died, 5 had side-effects (2 withdrawals), and 5 failed to complete follow-up. The median time from onset of hemorrhage to starting drug therapy was 6 days for both groups. Life table analysis showed an equivalent incidence of further hemorrhage in both groups over the first 60 days, following which the propranolol group did consistently better than the placebo group. There was a significantly lower incidence of rebleeding in modified Child's C patients receiving propranolol (39%) than those on placebo (90%). No statistically significant effect on mortality was seen. In this study, propranolol reduced the incidence of late recurrence of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis.

A prognostic evaluation of endoscopic intravariceal injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices

Eighty cases of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices were retrospectively studied to evaluate their prognoses. These cases were evaluated in terms of post-therapeutic bleeding, survival rates and causes of death. Post-therapeutic bleeding occurred in 50% of the emergency cases (26 cases), 25% of the elective cases (16 cases) and 23.7% of the prophylactic cases (38 cases). The frequency of post-therapeutic bleeding was significantly lower in cases with variceal obliteration than in cases without obliteration. An evaluation of the survival rates by the Kaplan-Meier method revealed that poor prognostic factors in sclerotherapy cases were emergency cases, Child's C group, post-therapeutic cases with unsuccessfully obliterated varices, and cases with post-therapeutic bleeding. Concerning early death within 7 days after sclerotherapy, 4 emergency cases died from initial variceal bleeding despite sclerotherapy. Three of these 4 were hepatocellular carcinoma cases, and all 3 cases had tumor thrombi of the portal vein. We recommend prophylactic sclerotherapy from the standpoint of the prognosis after sclerotherapy. However, in the bleeding cases of hepatocellular carcinoma in Child's C group complicated by tumor thrombi of the portal vein, overly enthusiastic application of the therapy should be avoided.