Ampullary hamartoma: endoscopic diagnosis and treatment

Ectopic Pancreas in the Proximal Jejunum Associated with Duodenal Brunner's Gland Hyperplasia and Bile Duct Hamartoma

A case of a patient with ectopic pancreas in the proximal jejunum associated with duodenal bile duct hamartoma and Brunner's gland hyperplasia is described. The simultaneous finding of these discrete and uncommon lesions has not been previously reported and allows for speculation about a common embryologic origin.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Initial Endoscopy for Ampullary Tumors

Background/Aims

Ampullary tumors come in a wide variety of malignant forms. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy for ampullary tumors, and analyzed the causes of misdiagnosis.

Methods

We compared endoscopic imaging and biopsy results to final diagnoses. Types of endoscope, numbers of biopsy specimens taken, and final diagnoses were evaluated as possible factors influencing diagnostic accuracy.

Results

Final diagnoses were 19 adenocarcinomas, 18 normal or papillitis, 11 adenomas, two adenomyomas, one paraganglioma, and one neuroendocrine tumor. The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic imaging or the initial biopsy was identical (67.3%). At least one test was concordant with the final diagnosis in all except two cases. Compared with the final diagnosis, endoscopic imaging tended to show more advanced tumors, whereas the initial biopsy revealed less advanced lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of the initial biopsy was influenced by the type of endoscope used and the final diagnosis, but not by the number of biopsies taken.

Conclusions

Endoscopy has limited accuracy in the diagnosis of ampullary tumors. However, most cases with concordant endoscopic imaging and biopsy results are identical to the final diagnosis. Therefore, in cases where both of these tests disagree, re-evaluation with a side-viewing endoscope after resolution of papillitis is required.

When in doubt, take it out? Cholestasis and obstructive gastric outlet syndrome in a patient with suspected chronic pancreatitis

In some patients with tumors located in the pancreas or in the periampullary region, the decision to perform a surgical resection can be difficult. In patients with concomitant chronic pancreatitis this decision can be even more challenging, since a definitive preoperative differentiation between non-malignant and malignant tumors in many cases is not possible. Clinical symptoms or complications from the tumor often direct a rational treatment strategy. For therapeutic decisions, an interdisciplinary discussion of all diagnostic findings by experienced clinicians is needed. However, in rare cases, like the one presented here, an uncommon non-malignant entity like a periampullary hamartoma may be only diagnosed after surgical resection.

Ampullectomy for an unexpected ampullary hamartoma in a heterotaxic patient

INTRODUCTION

Heterotaxy designates rare congenital disorders of organ positioning in the thoracic and abdominal cavities, which can be associated with numerous anomalies, complicating the surgical management because of the loss of conventional anatomic landmarks.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 72-year-old man was found to have asymptomatic cholestasis. Further workup included computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography that revealed anomalies of lateralization of digestive organs associated with intestinal malrotation and polysplenia, and a stone-like element in the main bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failed to extract the lesion. Laparotomy found no stone, but a polypoid tumor with ampullary implantation. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was judged unreasonable due to the presence of macroscopic cirrhosis and a complete ampullectomy was performed. Histopathological examination revealed a hamartomatous polyp.

DISCUSSION

The unusual angle of the duodenoscope in a left-sided duodenum may have contributed to the improper pre-operative diagnosis. Endosonography could have recognized the tissular origin of the lesion and prompted a more detailed preoperative planning. It was fortunate that the patient ended up receiving the appropriate treatment despite the absence of an adequate pre-operative diagnosis, as the option of performing an extended resection was ruled out due to the presence of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Although heterotaxy leads to increased technical difficulties in performing usual endoscopic and surgical procedures, it can be safely managed by experienced surgeons as illustrated by the present case. Imaging modalities have limited sensitivity in the diagnosis of small ampullary tumors. As false-negatives are likely to occur, this possibility should guide the choice of the best operation.

Pancreatitis, Other Inflammatory Lesions, and Pancreatic Pseudotumors

The pancreas is versatile in the diversity of disorders that it can exhibit. In this article, characteristics of disorders such as chronic, autoimmune, eosinophilic, hereditary, and infectious pancreatitis are described. With regard to autoimmune pancreatitis, the role of clinical evaluation, histologic examination, and IgG4 immunohistochemistry is discussed. The role of pancreatitis in the pathogenesis of diabetes is also mentioned. Some implications of pancreatitis are highlighted, including the neoplastic predisposition caused by inflammatory lesions of the pancreas. The goal of this article is to convey an appreciation of these disorders because their recognition can benefit patients tremendously, as inflammatory lesions of the pancreas can be mass-forming, giving rise to pseudotumors, and leading to surgical resection that may otherwise be unnecessary.

Ampullary adenomyoma presenting as acute recurrent pancreatitis

Adenomyoma is a term generally applied to nodular lesions showing proliferation of both epithelial and smooth muscle components. Despite its benign nature, ampullary adenomyoma is usually presented as biliary obstruction. Most cases are misdiagnosed as carcinoma or adenoma by preoperative endoscopic or radiologic procedure. Therefore, it is frequently treated with extensive surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case in English literature of adenomyoma located in the peripancreatic orifice resulting in intermittent pancreatic duct obstruction and recurrent pancreatitis diagnosed by the endoscopic piecemeal resection.

Pancreatic pseudotumors: non-neoplastic solid lesions of the pancreas that clinically mimic pancreas cancer

In the pancreas, a variety of non-neoplastic conditions may form solid masses that may mimic cancer. Up to 5% of pancreatectomies performed with the preoperative clinical diagnosis of carcinoma will prove to be non-neoplastic by pathologic examination, although this figure is decreasing with improved diagnostic modalities. Chronic inflammatory lesions are the leading cause of this phenomenon ("pseudotumoral pancreatitis"), and among these, autoimmune and paraduodenal pancreatitides (discussed separately in this issue) are most important. In this article, we will focus on the noninflammatory lesions that may form tumor-like lesions of the pancreas. Adenomyomatous hyperplasia of ampulla of Vater is a subtle lesion that is difficult to define; larger examples (>5 mm) have been found to be the cause of obstructive jaundice. Accessory (heterotopic) spleen may form a well-defined nodule within the tail of the pancreas and is typically mistaken for endocrine neoplasm. Lipomatous hypertrophy is the replacement of pancreatic tissue with mature adipose tissue that occasionally leads to moderate to marked enlargement of the pancreas. Hamartomas are very rare if the entity is defined strictly. They are characterized by irregularly arranged mature pancreatic elements admixed with stromal tissue. A cellular, spindle-cell variant with c-kit (CD117) expression is recognized. Pseudolymphoma forms well-defined nodules composed of hyperplastic lymphoid tissue. Rarely, foreign-body deposits, granulomatous inflammations (such as sarcoidosis or tuberculosis), and congenital lesions may form tumoral lesions. In conclusion, it is important to recognize the types of conditions that form pseudotumors in the pancreas so that they can be distinguished from ductal adenocarcinomas, especially clinically, but also pathologically. Nonspecific terms such as "inflammatory pseudotumor" ought to be avoided, and every attempt should be made to classify a "pseudotumor" into a more specific diagnostic category discussed above.

Factors predictive of malignancy and endoscopic resectability in ampullary neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic treatment of ampullary lesions has been well described, though it remains uncertain if specific features predict malignancy, and whether identifiable factors are associated with successful endoscopic resection of benign lesions.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation of ampullary neoplasia between March 2000 and May 2004 were included in the study. Clinical presentation, underlying medical conditions, endoscopic treatment, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to define extent of local involvement, pathology results, and outcome were documented. Data elements for analysis included EUS findings, lesion lifting with submucosal injection, age, gender, tumor size, and endoscopic intervention. Analyses were performed to determine the ability to predict malignancy and the ability to extirpate benign lesions.

RESULTS

Thirty-one males and 25 females were included; mean age was 62 yr. Final diagnoses included 29 adenomas, 20 adenocarcinomas, 4 adenomyomas, 2 paragangliomas, and 1 neuroendocrine tumor. Thirty of 35 patients with benign lesions had extirpation with a mean of two endoscopic procedures. Complications of endoscopic resection included cholangitis (1), bleeding (2), and pancreatitis (4). The presence of malignancy was associated by multivariate analysis with the inability to obtain a cleavage plane with saline injection. Univariate analysis also identified EUS T stage as a predictor of malignancy. In benign lesions, none of the analyzed variables predicted successful endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSION

In ampullary lesions, failure to achieve a cleavage plane with submucosal injection is the strongest predictor of malignancy followed by EUS T stage. Endoscopic treatment of benign ampullary neoplasia is effective; no factor was predictive of successful extirpation.

Adenomyoma and adenomyomatous hyperplasia of the Vaterian system: clinical, pathological, and new immunohistochemical features of 13 cases

Adenomyoma and adenomyomatous hyperplasia of the Vaterian system are consistently benign lesions. Clinically, adenomyoma mimics frequently ampullary adenoma or carcinoma, and biopsy analysis is often difficult. The histogenesis of ampullary adenomyoma and adenomyomatous hyperplasia is still subject to debate. We present a retrospective study of clinicopathological features of 13 cases of surgically resected ampullary adenomyoma. The age of our patients was between 38 and 78 years (mean: 63 y). The preoperative diagnosis was ampullary tumor or tumor of the head of the pancreas. On macroscopy, a white, firm lesion of the ampullary wall was observed; its size ranged between 10 and 30 mm. Histologically the lesion consisted of multiple glandular structures surrounded by a fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferation, resulting in a "pseudo-hypertrophy" of the Vaterian system. The immunophenotype of the epithelial component was cytokeratin 7+/cytokeratin 20-, similar to that of the normal biliary and pancreatic duct system. The epithelial cells exhibited low proliferative activity. The hyperplastic myofibroblastic cells expressed smooth muscle actin. A complete pancreatic heterotopy contiguous with the adenomyoma was noted in three cases. Adenomyoma and adenomyomatous hyperplasia of the Vaterian system are benign lesions frequently treated by extensive surgery because of long-term biliary obstruction. The clinicopathological characteristics suggest either a reactive and/or a malformative, nonneoplastic nature for this lesion, which could, in some cases, develop from heterotopic pancreas. The immunophenotype of epithelial cells may be a useful tool for differentiating it from ampullary adenoma on biopsy specimens.