Intestinal absorption of ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with extrahepatic biliary obstruction and bile drainage

Diagnosis by Microbial Culture, Breath Tests and Urinary Excretion Tests, and Treatments of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized as the increase in the number and/or alteration in the type of bacteria in the upper gastrointestinal tract and accompanies various bowel symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, gases, diarrhea, and so on. Clinically, SIBO is diagnosed by microbial culture in duodenum/jejunum fluid aspirates and/or the breath tests (BT) of hydrogen/methane gases after ingestion of carbohydrates such as glucose. The cultural analysis of aspirates is regarded as the golden standard for the diagnosis of SIBO; however, this is invasive and is not without risk to the patients. BT is an inexpensive and safe diagnostic test but lacks diagnostic sensitivity and specificity depending on the disease states of patients. Additionally, the urinary excretion tests are used for the SIBO diagnosis using chemically synthesized bile acid conjugates such as cholic acid (CA) conjugated with para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA-CA), ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) conjugated with PABA (PABA-UDCA) or conjugated with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA-UDCA). These conjugates are split by bacterial bile acid (cholylglycine) hydrolase. In the tests, the time courses of the urinary excretion rates of PABA or 5-ASA, including their metabolites, are determined as the measure of hydrolytic activity of intestinal bacteria. Although the number of clinical trials with this urinary excretion tests is small, results demonstrated the usefulness of bile acid conjugates as SIBO diagnostic substrates. PABA-UDCA disulfate, a single-pass type unabsorbable compound without the hydrolysis of conjugates, was likely to offer a simple and rapid method for the evaluation of SIBO without the use of radioisotopes or expensive special apparatus. Treatments of SIBO with antibiotics, probiotics, therapeutic diets, herbal medicines, and/or fecal microbiota transplantation are also reviewed.

Enhancing Dissolution and Oral Bioavailability of Ursodeoxycholic Acid with a Spray-Dried pH-Modified Extended Release Formulation

Ursodeoxycholate (UDCA) has low oral bioavailability and pH-dependent solubility and permeability. Thus, we developed a pH-modified extended-release formulation of UDCA using Na₂CO₃ as the alkalizing agent and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) as the release-modifying agent. The optimized pH-modified controlled-release UDCA formulation, with the UDCA:HPMC:Na₂CO₃ ratio of 200:600:150 (w/w/w), was prepared using a spray-drying method. Then, the formulation’s solubility, dissolution, and pharmacokinetic properties were characterized. In a pH-modified extended-release formulation of UDCA, the solubility of UDCA was increased to 8 mg/mL with a sustained dissolution for 12 h. Additionally, the spray-dried formulation exhibited amorphous states without molecular interaction among UDCA, Na₂CO₃, and HPMC. Moreover, the plasma UDCA concentration of the formulation maintained a higher UDCA concentration for up to 48 h than that of UDCA itself or the non-extended-release UDCA formulation. Consequently, the formulation significantly increased the AUC compared to UDCA or the non-extended-release UDCA formulation in rats. In conclusion, we have improved UDCA’s solubility and dissolution profile by preparing a pH-modified extended-release formulation with the UDCA:HPMC:Na₂CO₃ ratio of 200:600:150 (w/w/w), which effectively increased the oral bioavailability of UDCA by 251% in rats.

Preparation and characterization of sorafenib-loaded microprecipitated bulk powder for enhancing oral bioavailability

The aim of this study was to prepare and evaluate Eudragit-based microprecipitated bulk powder (MBP) formulations to enhance the oral bioavailability of sorafenib. Cationic Eudragit E PO and anionic Eudragit S100 were selected for MBP preparation. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-incorporated MBP was also prepared to study the synergistic effect of UDCA in enhancing the bioavailability of sorafenib. Sorafenib-loaded MBPs were successfully prepared by a pH-controlled precipitation method using an aqueous antisolvent. Submicron-sized particles of MBPs were observed by scanning electron microscopy, and the amorphous form of sorafenib in MBPs was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction. MBPs of cationic and anionic Eudragits showed different in vitro dissolution and pharmacokinetic profiles in rats. Sorafenib in Eudragit E PO-based MBP (E PO-MBP) was rapidly dissolved at low pH conditions (pH 1.2 and 4.0), but was precipitated again at pH 4.0 within 4 h. Dissolution of sorafenib from Eudragit S100-based MBP (S100-MBP) was high at pH 7.4 and did not precipitate for up to 4 h. After oral administration to rats, all MBPs, compared with powder, improved the oral absorption of sorafenib, with S100-MBP showing 1.5-fold higher relative oral bioavailability than E PO-MBP. Moreover, incorporation of UDCA in S100-MBP (S100-UDCA-MBP) further increased the C_max and oral bioavailability of sorafenib, although the dissolution was not significantly different from that of S100-MBP. Taken together, Eudragit-based MBP formulations could be a promising strategy for enhancing the oral bioavailability of sorafenib.

A Systems Model for Ursodeoxycholic Acid Metabolism in Healthy and Patients With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

A systems model was developed to describe the metabolism and disposition of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and its conjugates in healthy subjects based on pharmacokinetic (PK) data from published studies in order to study the distribution of oral UDCA and potential interactions influencing therapeutic effects upon interruption of its enterohepatic recirculation. The base model was empirically adapted to patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) based on current understanding of disease pathophysiology and clinical measurements. Simulations were performed for patients with PBC under two competing hypotheses: one for inhibition of ileal absorption of both UDCA and conjugates and the other only of conjugates. The simulations predicted distinctly different bile acid distribution patterns in plasma and bile. The UDCA model adapted to patients with PBC provides a platform to investigate a complex therapeutic drug interaction among UDCA, UDCA conjugates, and inhibition of ileal bile acid transport in this rare disease population.

Bile deficiency induces changes in intestinal glucose absorption in mice

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract obstruction is a common clinical problem. In this study, we attempted to understand the change in intestinal glucose absorption after biliary tract obstruction.

METHODS

Experimental models of murine biliary duct ligation and external biliary drainage were established. Murine intestinal mucosal glucose absorption was examined with Ussing chambers according to the increase in the short-circuit current in vitro and blood glucose measurement after oral glucose in vivo. The protein expression of the sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT1) and the facilitated glucose transporter, member 2 (GLUT2) was analyzed by Western blot and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The results from Ussing chamber experiments showed that duodenal mucosal glucose absorption levels were significantly higher in biliary duct ligation and biliary drainage mice than those in normal control mice at 1 and 2 weeks after the operation. Gastrointestinal bile acid administration almost reversed the elevated duodenal mucosal glucose absorption to the normal level in biliary drainage mice. The results from the experiments in vivo further confirmed that the glucose absorption increased in biliary duct ligation and biliary drainage mice. The protein expression levels of SGLT1 in the duodenal mucosae of both biliary duct ligation and biliary drainage mice were markedly higher than those in control mice, and the protein expression of GLUT2 was not significantly altered, compared with control mice.

CONCLUSION

Bile deficiency in the intestine upregulates the expression of intestinal mucosal SGLT1 and enhances intestinal mucosal glucose absorption capacity, which contributes to the understanding of intestinal physiologic function for patients with biliary duct obstruction and external biliary drainage.

Bile deficiency induces changes in intestinal Cl(-) and HCO3 (-) secretions in mice

AIMS

Biliary tract obstruction is a common clinical lesion. However, the effect of biliary tract obstruction on intestinal secretion is poorly understood. In this study, we made an investigation on intestinal HCO3 (-) and Cl(-) secretions in an experimental model of murine biliary duct ligation.

METHODS

Murine intestinal mucosal HCO3 (-) and Cl(-) secretions were examined in vitro in Ussing chambers by pH-stat and short-circuit current (Isc ) techniques. The mRNA and protein expressions of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and the Na(+) -K(+) -2Cl(-) cotransporter (NKCC1) were analysed by real-time PCR, western blot and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Basal Cl(-) secretion and forskolin-stimulated duodenal and jejunal mucosal HCO3 (-) and Cl(-) secretions in mice with common biliary duct ligation were markedly elevated, compared with controls (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). Further experiments showed that basal Cl(-) secretion and forskolin-stimulated duodenal and jejunal mucosal HCO3 (-) and Cl(-) secretions in mice with external bile drainage were also markedly elevated. CFTRinh -172 inhibited forskolin-stimulated HCO3 (-) and Cl(-) secretions. The mRNA and protein expression levels of CFTR and NKCC1 in the intestinal mucosa with both biliary duct ligation and external bile drainage were markedly higher than those in controls (P < 0.001). Bile acid administration restored the changes in function and expression of CFTR and NKCC1 in the intestinal mucosa.

CONCLUSION

Bile deficiency in the intestine up-regulates the expressions of intestinal mucosal CFTR and NKCC1 and enhances intestinal mucosal HCO3 (-) and Cl(-) secretion capacity, which contributes to the understanding of intestinal physiological function for patients with biliary duct obstruction.

High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid is associated with the development of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVES

Some studies have suggested that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may have a chemopreventive effect on the development of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We examined the effects of high-dose (28-30 mg/kg/day) UDCA on the development of colorectal neoplasia in patients with UC and PSC.

METHODS

Patients with UC and PSC enrolled in a prior, multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial of high-dose UDCA were evaluated for the development of colorectal neoplasia. Patients with UC and PSC who received UDCA were compared with those who received placebo. We reviewed the pathology and colonoscopy reports for the development of low-grade or high-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Fifty-six subjects were followed for a total of 235 patient years. Baseline characteristics (including duration of PSC and UC, medications, patient age, family history of colorectal cancer, and smoking status) were similar for both the groups. Patients who received high-dose UDCA had a significantly higher risk of developing colorectal neoplasia (dysplasia and cancer) during the study compared with those who received placebo (hazard ratio: 4.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-20.10, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term use of high-dose UDCA is associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with UC and PSC.

Bile acid changes after high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid treatment in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Relation to disease progression

High-dose (28-30 mg/kg/day) ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment improves serum liver tests in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) but does not improve survival and is associated with increased rates of serious adverse events. The mechanism for the latter undesired effect remains unclear. High-dose UDCA could result in the production of hepatotoxic bile acids, such as lithocholic acid (LCA), because of limited small bowel absorption of UDCA and conversion of UDCA by bacteria in the colon. We determined the serum bile acid composition in 56 patients with PSC previously enrolled in a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of high-dose UDCA versus placebo. Samples for analysis were obtained at the baseline and at the end of treatment. The mean changes in the UDCA level (16.86 versus 0.05 micromol/L) and total bile acid level (17.21 versus -0.55 micromol/L) were significantly higher in the UDCA group (n = 29) versus the placebo group (n = 27) when pretreatment levels were compared (P < 0.0001). LCA was also markedly increased (0.22 versus 0.01 micromol/L) in the UDCA group compared to the placebo group (P = 0.001). No significant changes were detected for cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, or chenodeoxycholic acid. Patients (n = 9) in the UDCA group who reached clinical endpoints of disease progression (the development of cirrhosis, varices, liver transplantation, or death) tended to have greater increases in their posttreatment total bile acid levels (34.99 versus 9.21 micromol/L, P < 0.08) in comparison with those who did not.

CONCLUSION

High-dose UDCA treatment in PSC patients results in marked UDCA enrichment and significant expansion of the total serum bile acid pool, including LCA.

Bile acids in treatment of ocular disease

Bear bile has been included in Asian pharmacopeias for thousands of years in treatment of several diseases, ranging from sore throat to hemorrhoids. The hydrophilic bile acids tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are the major bile acids of bear bile. Both of these are available as synthetic formulations and are approved by the health administrations of several countries for treatment of cirrhosis and gallstones. This review briefly covers the use of bear bile in Traditional Chinese Medicine, bile acid physiology, approved use of UDCA and TUDCA in Western medicine, and recent research exploring their neuroprotective properties, including in models of ocular disease.

Effect of colitis and ileoanal pouch on biliary enrichment of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis

In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), biliary enrichment of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may represent the decisive factor for its presumable beneficial effect. Up to now it is not clear how colitis and colectomy with ileo-anal pouch affect the biliary enrichment of UDCA and the biliary bile acid composition. We determined the biliary bile acid composition in 63 patients with PSC including 7 patients with ileo-anal pouch, 31 patients with colitis, and 25 patients without colitis. No differences existed between patients with and those without colitis. In patients with colectomy and pouch at a UDCA dose of 17.7 +/- 1.6 mg/kg (n = 7), biliary UDCA represented 46.4 +/- 6.7% (mean +/- SD) of total bile acids. An increase in the dose in six pouch patients from 12.5 +/- 0.9 to 22.3 +/- 1.6 mg/kg led to a slight increase in biliary enrichment of UDCA, from 39.8 +/- 8.1 to 49.4 +/- 10.7%. In five of seven patients with ileo-anal pouch, biliary UDCA enrichment was within the normal range, and in two of seven it was permanently or intermittently abnormally low. During UDCA treatment, in pouch patients the biliary content of deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid was reduced, whereas all other bile acids were unchanged. In a minority of patients with ileo-anal pouch, biliary enrichment of UDCA may be markedly reduced, whereas patients with colitis have a biliary UDCA enrichment not different from that of patient without colitis.

Effect of high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid on its biliary enrichment in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has beneficial effects in cholestatic liver diseases. In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), there is evidence that high doses (+/- 20 mg/kg) of UDCA may be more effective than average doses. Biliary enrichment of UDCA at such high doses may represent the decisive factor for its beneficial effect. Up to now it is not clear how high-dose UDCA correlates with its biliary enrichment and whether bacterial degradation of large amounts of UDCA may lead to an increased bacterial formation of more toxic hydrophobic bile acids. We determined the biliary bile acid composition in 56 patients with PSC including 30 patients with repeat bile samples treated with various doses of UDCA. At a UDCA dose of 10-13 mg/kg/d (n = 18) biliary UDCA represented 43.1% + 0.3% (mean + SD) of total bile acids; at a UDCA dose of 14-17 mg/kg (n = 14), its biliary content increased to 46.9% + 0.3%, at 18-21 mg/kg (n = 34) to 55.9% + 0.2%, at 22-25 mg/kg (n = 12) to 58.6% + 2.3%, and at 26-32 mg/kg (n = 8) to 57.7% + 0.4%. During UDCA treatment, the biliary content of all other bile acids was unchanged or decreased. In conclusion, biliary enrichment of UDCA increases with increasing dose and reaches a plateau at 22-25 mg/kg. There was no increase of toxic hydrophobic bile acids. If biliary enrichment of UDCA represents the decisive factor for its clinical effect, it seems likely that UDCA doses of up to 22-25 mg/kg may be more effective than lower doses.

Intestinal absorption and biliary secretion of ursodeoxycholic acid and its taurine conjugate

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and its taurine conjugate (TUDCA) exert a protective effect in cholestatic liver diseases. A greater hepatoprotective effect of TUDCA has been suggested. Absorption appears to be a limiting factor and up to now has not been studied in man.

METHODS

We studied absorption and biliary bile acid secretion and composition after administration of UDCA and TUDCA in patients who had complete extrahepatic biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma but had no intestinal or liver disease. After 5 days of intact enterohepatic circulation eight patients with a percutaneous biliary-duodenal drainage received, during two study periods, 1000 mg (1916.9 micromol; mean 29.6 micromol kg(-1)) TUDCA and 750 mg (1910.4 micromol; mean 29.5 micromol kg(-1)) UDCA in random order. Each patient served as his own control.

RESULTS

After UDCA and TUDCA administration the biliary UDCA content increased to 55.2% and 54.6% of total bile acids, respectively (not significant). Biliary secretion of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids remained unchanged whereas that of lithocholic acid increased slightly. A total of 64.6% of the orally administered TUDCA and 55.1% of the UDCA was absorbed (not significant). After TUDCA administration, biliary UDCA was preferentially (95.4%) taurine-conjugated whereas after UDCA administration biliary UDCA was mainly (79.8%) glycine-conjugated.

CONCLUSIONS

After oral administration of TUDCA and UDCA, no significant differences in their absorption and in biliary bile acid secretion exist. Whether biliary enrichment with taurine conjugates of UDCA instead of glycine conjugates offers advantages in the treatment of cholestatic liver disease is unclear at present.

The UDCA dosage deficit: a fate shared with CDCA

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used both as the treatment of choice in many cholestatic syndromes and as complementary therapy in many liver diseases. However, few dose-finding studies exist, and none has evaluated the efficacy and long-term safety of UDCA therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). There is an open debate about UDCA's impact on the natural history of PBC, and no universal evidence of benefits on the major endpoint exists. This is perhaps due to a UDCA dosage deficit. Most clinical trials on PBC therapy have used conservative dosages of UDCA similar to those of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) used for dissolution of gallstones. It may be necessary to re-evaluate the dosage of UDCA that provides the most effective treatment.

A preliminary trial of high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used for the treatment of cholestatic liver diseases including primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) for which it has a positive effect on laboratory values, may delay the development of liver failure and prolong the transplant-free disease period. Standard doses of UDCA (8-15 mg/kg daily) have been shown to be ineffective in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We report on the findings (clinical, biochemical, histological, and cholangiographic) and side effects of a 2-year double-blind placebo-controlled preliminary study of high-dose UDCA in PSC patients.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with PSC were randomized to high-dose (20 mg/kg daily) UDCA or placebo. Cholangiography and liver biopsy were performed at entry and after 2 years. Symptoms, clinical signs, and liver biochemical tests were recorded at 3 monthly intervals.

RESULTS

High-dose UDCA did not influence symptoms, but there was a significant improvement in liver biochemistry (serum alkaline phosphatase, P = 0.03; gamma-glutamyl transferase, P = 0.01) and a significant reduction in progression in cholangiographic appearances (P = 0.015) and liver fibrosis as assessed by disease staging (P = 0.05). In the treatment group, a significant increase in total bile acids and saturation with UDCA >70% confirmed patient compliance. No significant side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose UDCA may be of clinical benefit in PSC, but trials with a larger number of participants and of longer duration are required to establish whether the effect of high-dose UDCA on liver biochemistry, histology, and cholangiography in patients with PSC is translated into improved long-term survival.

Enhancement of ursodeoxycholic acid bioavailability by cross-linked sodium carboxymethyl cellulose

The bioavailability of ursodeoxycholic acid from a new formulation based on drug-loaded cross-linked sodium carboxymethyl cellulose was studied in man. The plasma levels of ursodeoxycholic acid were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after derivatization and sample purification by solid-phase extraction. Capsules containing the drug/polymer system were prepared and compared with conventional commercial ursodeoxycholic acid capsules after single oral administration using a randomized crossover experimental design. Although the drug/polymer system improved the in-vitro dissolution rate of ursodeoxycholic acid in simulated intestinal fluid, statistical evaluation of the area under the plasma concentration curves indicated no significant difference in the extent of bioavailability between the two formulations (14.93+/-4.43 vs 14.95+/-5.79 microM h; P > 0.2). However, following the administration of the ursodeoxycholic acid/cross-linked sodium carboxymethyl cellulose system with an enteric-coated capsule, the mean area under the plasma concentration curve (27.60+/-10.11 microM h) was significantly higher than that obtained after treatment with the commercially available ursodeoxycholic acid capsule (16.24+/-8-38 microM h; P < 0.05). We concluded that improved intestinal absorption of the drug was obtained with enteric-coated capsules filled with the ursodeoxycholic acid/polymer system. Moreover, the simplicity of the preparation and the non-toxicity of the polymer used as the carrier represented additional advantages of this dosage form.

Mechanism of hepatoprotective action of bile salts in liver disease

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver enzymes and in many instances liver histology in cholestatic liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Besides classic cholestatic diseases, UDCA also improves liver biochemistry in alcoholic liver disease and in chronic viral hepatitis C. The main target of UDCA treatment, however, is cholestasis, and consequently the mechanisms responsible for the beneficial effects in these diseases are of interest, and are discussed in detail in this article.

Differences in the metabolism and disposition of ursodeoxycholic acid and of its taurine-conjugated species in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

The clinical effectiveness of ursodeoxycholate in the treatment of liver disease may be limited by its poor absorption and extensive biotransformation. Because in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the more hydrophilic bile acid tauroursodeoxycholate has greater beneficial effects than ursodeoxycholate, we have compared for the first time the absorption, metabolism, and clinical responses to these bile acids in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Twelve female patients with PBC were sequentially administered tauroursodeoxycholate and ursodeoxycholate (750 mg/d for 2 months) in a randomized, cross-over study. Bile acids were measured in serum, duodenal bile, urine, and feces by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Biliary ursodeoxycholate enrichment was higher during tauroursodeoxycholate administration (32.6% vs. 29.2% during ursodeoxycholate; P <.05). Lithocholic acid concentration was consistently higher in all biological fluids during ursodeoxycholate administration. Fecal bile acid excretion was the major route of elimination of both bile acids; ursodeoxycholate accounted for 8% and 23% of the total fecal bile acids during tauroursodeoxycholate and ursodeoxycholate administration, respectively (P <.05). Tauroursodeoxycholate was better absorbed than ursodeoxycholate, and, although it was partially deconjugated and reconjugated with glycine, it underwent reduced biotransformation to more hydrophobic metabolites. This comparative study suggests that tauroursodeoxycholate has significant advantages over ursodeoxycholate that may be of benefit for long-term therapy in PBC.

Mitochondria and childhood liver diseases

The newly recognized mitochondrial hepatopathies should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute and chronic liver disease in childhood. It may appear as neonatal liver failure, delayed onset liver failure in early childhood or as a multisystemic process. Comparison of features of several of the known primary mitochondrial hepatopathies is provided in Table 5. Secondary mitochondrial hepatopathies are examples of the critical importance of mitochondrial function in the pathogenesis of liver injury. Our improved understanding of the role of the mitochondria in cellular necrosis and apoptosis opens the way for development of new therapeutic approaches to several hepatic disorders. Primary mitochondrial hepatopathies (especially the respiratory chain defects) should be considered in any child with liver disease and neuromuscular involvement, multisystemic disease, lactic acidosis or rapidly progressive disease, and when hepatic steatosis is the dominant histologic finding on examination of a liver specimen. Current therapies are inadequate; improved therapeutic strategies are needed for these disorders. Some patients with respiratory chain defects limited to the liver have had successful liver transplantation. This field is in evolution and will undoubtedly provide new and important developments as the next millennium begins.

A randomized trial in primary biliary cirrhosis comparing ursodeoxycholic acid in daily doses of either 10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg. Dutch Multicentre PBC Study Group

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) prolongs transplantation-free survival in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, the optimal therapeutic dose has not been established.

AIM

To compare the effects of UDCA administered in daily doses of 10 vs. 20 mg/kg on symptoms, liver biochemistry and biliary UDCA enrichment.

METHODS

A 6-month multicentre randomized open controlled trial was conducted to assess the effects of an increase in the dose of UDCA to 20 mg/kg/day vs. continuation of 10 mg/kg/day for patients who had not achieved biochemical normalization during treatment for at least 6 months with the 10 mg/kg dose. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed at entry and at 3-month intervals. The percentage UDCA in duodenal bile was assessed at entry and at 6 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were enrolled. No side-effects of UDCA were observed. Within the 20 mg/kg/day group significant decreases were found for alkaline phosphatase (- 8%; P = 0.003), aspartate aminotransferase (- 11%; P = 0.01), alanine aminotransferase (- 17%; P < 0.001), gamma-glutamyl transferase (- 34%; P < 0.001), immunoglobulin M (- 11%; P = 0.002) and cholesterol (- 8.1%; P < 0.001). In the 10 mg/kg group none of these parameters differed significantly from baseline. No significant differences between dose groups for symptom scores or serum bilirubin were found. Biliary enrichment with UDCA increased from 37% to 46% in the 20 mg/kg group (P = 0.02) while remaining stable in the 10 mg/kg group.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver biochemistry improved in PBC patients receiving UDCA 20 mg/kg/day compared to a dose of 10 mg/kg/day. Both doses were equally well tolerated. These results indicate that UDCA 10 mg/kg/ day is a suboptimal dose for treating PBC.

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy for primary sclerosing cholangitis: results of a 2-year randomized controlled trial to evaluate single versus multiple daily doses

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Ursodeoxycholic acid has been reported to be of potential benefit for primary sclerosing cholangitis but little is known about the long-term biochemical, histological and radiological efficacy or the optimum frequency of ursodeoxycholic acid administration.

METHODS

A 2-year multicentre randomised controlled trial was initiated to assess the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (10 mg kg(-1).d(-1), given in either single or multiple daily doses, on symptoms, serum liver tests, cholangiographic and histological findings and the occurrence of treatment failure. Liver biopsies were taken and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed at entry and after 2 years; follow-up examinations were at 3-month intervals. Treatment failure was defined as death, liver transplantation, 4-fold increase in serum bilirubin, variceal bleeding, de novo ascites or cholangitis. Actuarial survival was compared with predicted survival using the revised Mayo natural history model for primary sclerosing cholangitis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled. In one case, ursodeoxycholic acid had to be discontinued because of gastro-intestinal complaints. No other side-effects were observed. After 2 years of follow-up, treatment was not associated with a beneficial effect on either symptoms or liver histology. Serum liver tests (alkaline phosphatase, y-glutamyl transferase, aspartate aminotransferase) improved significantly in both groups, while serum bilirubin (which was near normal at entry) and IgG remained stable. No major changes in radiographic bile duct appearance seemed to be present. After 2 years, actuarial survival was 91% (95 CI 83%-99%), which is comparable to the predicted 97% survival rate. Treatment failure occurred in 15% of cases. No significant differences in any of the study endpoints (symptoms, serum liver tests, cholangiographic findings, histology, disease progression) were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ursodeoxycholic acid is well tolerated in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Significant effects on biochemical parameters were found and symptoms, bilirubin and histology did not deteriorate. No advantage of a multiple daily dose over a single dose was observed.

Cholesterol metabolism and serum and biliary noncholesterol sterols in gallstone patients during simvastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid treatments

Effects of long-term high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and simvastatin treatments on cholesterol metabolism and biliary lipid compositions were compared in patients with cholesterol gallstones. Absorption and synthesis of cholesterol, serum and biliary noncholesterol sterols and lipids were determined in 14 patients randomized to UDCA (23-25 mg/kg/d) or simvastatin (40 mg/d) for 1 year. Simvastatin reduced serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 55%, and UDCA, by 9%. Cholesterol absorption was decreased (35%) by UDCA, but nonsignificantly increased by simvastatin (P < .05 for difference of changes caused by the two drugs). Whole-body synthesis and biliary output of cholesterol were both significantly decreased only by UDCA. In addition, UDCA inconsistently increased the proportions of serum and biliary precursor sterols of cholesterol, known to reflect cholesterol synthesis, but did not affect their biliary secretions. Simvastatin, however, dramatically reduced serum and also biliary cholesterol precursor sterol proportions and their biliary secretions and increased proportions of serum and biliary plant sterols and cholestanol, known to reflect cholesterol absorption, but had no effect on their biliary secretion. Only UDCA significantly decreased the molar percentage of cholesterol, the lithogenic index, and the cholesterol/phospholipid (CH/ PL) ratio in bile, whereas both treatments inconsistently decreased the vesicular CH/PL ratio (P < .07 in both groups). It is concluded that both drugs decreased serum cholesterol and inhibited cholesterol synthesis, but had a differing influence on precursor sterols and the absorption of cholesterol. UDCA had more beneficial effects than simvastatin on the antilithogenic properties of bile.

Single or multiple dose ursodeoxycholic acid for cholestatic liver disease: biliary enrichment and biochemical response

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver biochemistry in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Since UDCA acts partly by reducing the intestinal absorption of hydrophobic endogenous bile salts and is poorly absorbed from the intestine, a multiple dose regimen has been advocated. Single dose treatment, on the other hand, may improve compliance.

AIM

The effects of a single or multiple dose regimen on liver enzymes and serum and biliary bile salts composition were evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients (19 PSC, 8 PBC), most with early stage disease, received UDCA (10 mg kg-1 day-1) in a single dose at bed time (n = 13) or in three divided gifts with meals (n = 14) over 3 months. Five patients had both treatment regimens in random order with a 1-month wash-out period in between.

RESULTS

Liver biochemistry equally improved in both groups. Biliary enrichment (% UDCA of total bile salts, mean +/- SEM) was 40.1 +/- 2.4 in the single dose group vs 40.8 +/- 2.8 in the multiple dose group (p = NS) and was positively correlated with biochemical improvement (AP: r = 0.47, p = 0.02; GGT: r = 0.58, p = 0.002; ASAT: r = 0.67, p = 0.002; ALAT: r = 0.52, p = 0.01). Biochemical improvement was not correlated with the concentration or %UDCA in serum. Patients participating in the cross-over design had comparable biochemical response and biliary %UDCA during both regimens.

CONCLUSION

Single and multiple dose UDCA have similar effects on liver biochemistry and biliary enrichment in cholestatic liver disease. Biochemical improvement appears to be related to biliary (but not serum) enrichment with UDCA.

Effects of oral ursodeoxycholic acid in healthy cats on clinicopathological parameters, serum bile acids and light microscopic and ultrastructural features of the liver

A blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) given orally, at a dose of 15 mg kg-1 per day for eight weeks, on the physical condition, haematological and serum biochemical profiles, urinalysis, total serum bile acids (TSBA) and hepatic histology of four healthy cats. There were no clinically important significant differences between the groups or within the treatment groups in clinicopathological parameters. TSBA concentrations or histology. A significant lower concentration/proportion of taurochenodeoxycholic acid was observed in the treated cats (P = 0.05). Only one treated cat accumulated measurable quantities of UDCA, and the compound appeared to be non-toxic. It did not increase the concentration of TSBA, and accumulated minimally in the serum. It should be investigated for therapeutic use in cats with hepatobiliary disease.

Synthesis and physicochemical, biological, and pharmacological properties of new bile acids amidated with cyclic amino acids

New analogs of cyclic amino acid-conjugated bile acids were synthesized, and their physicochemical and biological properties were compared with those of natural analogs. Ursodeoxycholic acid was amidated with D-proline, L-proline, 4-hydroxy-L-proline, and 4-methoxy-L-proline. Hyocholic and hyodeoxycholic acids were amidated with L-proline. The physicochemical properties were similar to those of the natural analogs. All of them were highly stable toward enzymatic C-24 amide bond hydrolysis and 7-dehydroxylation. Their transport, metabolism, and effect on biliary lipid secretion were evaluated in bile fistula rat after intravenous infusion. All the analogs were secreted in bile unmodified. The 4-methoxy-L-proline derivative produced the highest secretion rate, much higher than those of all the other natural and synthetic analogs. This was associated with a selective reduction of cholesterol secretion with normal phospholipid secretion and choleresis. When coinfused, all the analogs were able to prevent the hepatotoxicity induced by intravenous taurochenodeoxycholic acid, as revealed by normal choleresis, alkaline phosphatase, and lactate dehydrogenase values in bile. Considering the overall data, 4-methoxy-L-proline, 4-hydroxy-L-proline, and L-proline derivatives of ursodeoxycholic acid were more potent than the natural analogs.

Metabolism of orally administered tauroursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

The metabolism of tauroursodeoxycholic acid orally administered and its effects on the bile acid pool of patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis is described. Patients were randomly assigned 500, 1000, or 1500 mg/day of tauroursodeoxycholate for six months. Biliary and serum bile acids were measured before and during treatment by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and by high performance liquid chromatography. During tauroursodeoxycholate administration, the proportion of total ursodeoxycholate in bile reached mean (SEM) 34.4 (4.5)%, 32.8 (2.8)%, and 41.6 (3.0)% with doses of 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/day, respectively. Significant decreases in the proportions of chenodeoxycholate and cholate resulted. The glycine/taurine ratio of the biliary bile acid pool decreased from 1.9 at baseline, to 1.1 with the highest dose. Ursodeoxycholate in bile was conjugated with glycine and taurine, indicating that tauroursodeoxycholate undergoes significant deconjugation and reconjugation during its enterohepatic recycling. The proportion of lithocholate in bile remained unchanged. Fasting serum conjugated ursodeoxycholate concentration positively correlated with the tauroursodeoxycholate dose, and the increased proportion of ursodeoxycholate was accompanied by substantial decreases in the endogenous bile acids. Compared with previously published data for ursodeoxycholic acid therapy, these findings indicate that the shift toward a more hydrophilic bile acid pool is greater and potentially more favourable with tauroursodeoxycholate, and this is because of the reduced intestinal biotransformation of tauroursodeoxycholate.

Bioavailability study of a new, sinking, enteric-coated ursodeoxycholic acid formulation

A new enteric-coated ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) formulation which sinks in the stomach and releases the drug only at a pH > or = 6.5 was developed. In 12 healthy subjects we measured, using a specific enzyme immunoassay, the serum levels of UDCA after a single oral dose of 450 mg of UDCA in three different formulations; enteric coated sinking tablet, stomach-floating enteric coated hard gelatin capsule and conventional gelatin capsule. The drug was given after a meal. Results are expressed as mean +/- SD. The area under the curve [AUC, mumol l-1 (8 h)] following oral administration of enteric-coated, sinking UDCA (39.0 +/- 8.5) was significantly higher than that obtained after both conventional UDCA (30.5 +/- 4.9) and floating enteric coated UDCA (29.3 +/- 3.4). Moreover, the maximum UDCA serum concentration (Cmax) was significantly higher with the enteric coated sinking UDCA formulation when compared to the other two formulations, while the time of maximum UDCA serum concentration (tmax) occurred later. These results may be explained by the hypothesis that the sinking tablet is expelled in the latter phase of gastric emptying along with the solid content. It therefore reaches the intestine at the highest alkalization phase caused by sustained biliary and pancreatic secretions. When released, the protonated insoluble UDCA is promptly solubilized by the alkaline pH thus giving a higher UDCA concentration gradient which facilitates its passive absorption. On the other hand, the floating capsule reaches the intestine too early, still in presence of an acidic pH; and in this condition UDCA is almost insoluble and consequently may be malabsorbed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative studies of metabolism of simultaneously administered chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid in hamsters

We present the comparative studies of metabolism of chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid and their taurine conjugates in the liver and fecal culture from hamsters. When [24-14C]chenodeoxycholic acid and [11,12-3H]ursodeoxycholic acid were simultaneously instilled into the jujunal loop of bile fistula hamsters, both bile acids administered were recovered mainly as their conjugates with taurine and glycine in the fistula bile. The recovery of chenodeoxycholic acid was slightly but significantly higher than that of ursodeoxycholic acid. Chenodeoxycholic acid was more efficiently conjugated with glycine than ursodeoxycholic acid. The glycine/taurine ratio in the biliary chenodeoxycholic acid was 1.9, and that in ursodeoxycholic acid was 1.6. In addition, as much as 6.2% of ursodeoxycholic acid was excreted as the unconjugated form; on the other hand only 2.4% of unconjugated chenodeoxycholic acid was excreted. When [24-14C]chenodeoxycholyltaurine and [11,12-3H]ursodeoxycholyltaurine were simultaneously administered into the ileum loop of bile fistula hamsters, both bile salts were absorbed and secreted efficiently into the bile at the same rate. These results indicate that slightly lower recovery of ursodeoxycholic acid in the bile could be due to the less effective conjugation of ursodeoxycholic acid than chenodeoxycholic acid in the liver. Deconjugation by fecal culture from a hamster proceeded more rapidly in chenodeoxycholyltaurine than ursodeoxycholyltaurine. 7-Dehyroxylation to form lithocholic acid by fecal culture was also faster in chenodeoxycholic acid than ursodeoxycholic acid. The formation of 7-oxolithocholic acid from ursodeoxycholic acid was lesser than from chenodeoxycholic acid. In summary, bacterial deconjugation followed by 7-dehydroxylation to form lithocholic acid seems to be achieved more efficiently with chenodeoxycholic acid than ursodeoxycholic acid.

Ursodeoxycholate conjugates protect against disruption of cholesterol-rich membranes by bile salts

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Ursodeoxycholic acid attenuates hepatocellular injury in cholestatic disorders, possibly by counteracting membrane disruptive effects of endogenous bile salts. The possible physicochemical basis of this protective effect was explored by using model membranes composed of egg phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol.

METHODS

Large unilamellar vesicles containing trapped 3H inulin were prepared by extrusion and gel filtration. Vesicle disruption (release of trapped inulin) was quantified using rapid centrifugal ultrafiltration.

RESULTS

Disruption of membranes increased with bile salt concentration, hydrophobicity, and increasing ionic strength. Disruption decreased with a decreasing bile salt/phospholipid ratio or an increasing cholesterol/phospholipid ratio. Vesicle disruption by taurodeoxycholate (3 alpha, 12 alpha-dihydroxy-5 beta-cholanoyl taurine) was reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by addition of tauroursodeoxycholate (3 alpha,7 beta-dihydroxy-5 beta-cholanoyl taurine) (TUDC) when the cholesterol/phospholipid ratio was > or = 0.5, but TUDC was not protective at a cholesterol/phospholipid ratio < or = 0.2. Glycoursodeoxycholate (3 alpha,7 beta-dihydroxy-5 beta-cholanoyl glycine) was somewhat less protective than TUDC, and unconjugated ursodeoxycholate (3 alpha,7 beta-dihydroxy-5 beta-cholanoate) (UDC) had little effect. Taurine conjugates of several other hydrophilic bile salts were also protective, but protection was not strictly proportional to hydrophilicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Conjugates of UDC and other hydrophilic bile salts can reduce disruption of cholesterol-rich model membranes by more toxic bile salts via a purely physicochemical mechanism. UDC conjugates in vivo may protect the cholestatic liver by preventing bile salt disruption of the cholesterol-rich canalicular membrane.

Pharmacology of ursodeoxycholic acid, an enterohepatic drug

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, as well as the pharmacodynamic actions of ursodeoxycholic acid are reviewed and related to its physicochemical properties. Ursodeoxycholic acid is absorbed incompletely because of its low aqueous solubility. After absorption, it is conjugated with glycine or taurine and circulates with the endogenous bile acids. At usual doses (8-10 mg/kg/day), the pool of ursodeoxycholyl conjugates constitutes 30-60% of circulating bile acids. Ursodeoxycholic acid is metabolized by intestinal bacteriae to lithocholic acid which does not accumulate in the circulating bile acids because of efficient hepatic sulfation. Administration of ursodeoxycholic acid causes decreased cholesterol absorption, increased bile acid biosynthesis, and decreased biliary cholesterol secretion. Ursodeoxycholic acid is a choleretic agent, as all bile acids, but differs from other dihydroxy-bile acids in being non-cytotoxic because it has less affinity for membranes, and when present at micellar concentrations does not solubilize membranes. Chronic administration of ursodeoxycholic acid appears to increase canalicular transport.

Therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestatic liver disease

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has beneficial effects on symptoms, liver biochemistry and, possibly, liver histology in primary biliary cirrhosis and other cholestatic liver diseases. UDCA may exert these beneficial effects by a direct hepatoprotective effect, by influencing the enterohepatic circulation of endogenous bile salts, by enhancing bile flow through a cholehepatic shunt mechanism or by immune modulation. In the present article, established and potential indications for UDCA are reviewed.