Hemodynamic, neurohumoral, and metabolic responses to amino acid infusion in patients with cirrhosis

Diagnostic and prognostic role of presepsin in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infection

Objectives

Serum biomarkers have suboptimal accuracy for the early diagnosis of bacterial infection (BI) in cirrhosis.

Aim

To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of presepsin (PSP) in a cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

All adult cirrhotics admitted between 03.2016 and 06.2019 were consecutively evaluated. PSP was measured using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, and its accuracy was compared with that of common biomarkers.

Results

A total of 278 cirrhotic patients for a total of 448 hospitalizations were prospectively collected. Prevalence of BI at admission was 28.3%. Median (range) Log10PSP in the whole cohort was 2.83 (2.48-3.19) ng/L, significantly higher in patients with BI than in patients without (p<0.001). For a cutoff value of 2.87 ng/L, Log10PSP showed sensitivity, specificity and AUC-ROC of 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.74), 0.63 (95% CI 0.57-0.68) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.73), lower than that of C-reactive protein (p=0.002), but similar to procalcitonin (p=0.18) Patients with BI at hospitalization had higher probability of 28-day mortality (sub-hazard ratio [sHR] 2.65;95% CI 1.49-4.70; p=0.001). At multivariate Cox's regression analysis, Log10PSP (sHR 2.4; 95% CI 1.22-4.82; p=0.01) together with age and severity of liver disease, was an independent predictor of short-term mortality.

Conclusions

PSP shows low diagnostic accuracy for BI in cirrhosis, but it is an independent predictor of short-term mortality. PSP may be a biomarker of systemic inflammation, commonly seen in end-stage liver disease.

Relationships between haemodynamic alterations and the development of ascites or refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

In patients with cirrhosis, the relationships between haemodynamic alterations and the development of ascites or the occurrence of refractory ascites are unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients with non-refractory ascites to haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients without ascites and in patients with refractory ascites.

METHODS

A cohort of 121 patients was prospectively studied, of whom 29 patients did not have ascites, 45 had non-refractory ascites and 47 had refractory ascites. Splanchnic, renal and systemic haemodynamics were measured in all patients.

RESULTS

The hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly higher in patients with non-refractory ascites than in patients without ascites (18.5 +/- 0.8 mmHg versus 15.8 +/- 0.7 mmHg). Renal and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with non-refractory ascites and patients without ascites. The glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow were significantly lower in patients with refractory ascites than in patients with non-refractory ascites (77 +/- 4 versus 107 +/- 5 ml/min and 867 +/- 62 versus 1,008 +/- 68 ml/min, respectively). Splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with refractory ascites and patients with non-refractory ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cirrhosis, an increase in portal hypertension was the sole haemodynamic alteration related to the development of ascites. Renal vasoconstriction (and subsequent renal hypoperfusion and hypofiltration) was the only haemodynamic alteration related to the occurrence of refractory ascites. The development of ascites or refractory ascites was not associated with any alteration in systemic haemodynamics.

Renal handling of drugs and amino acids after impairment of kidney or liver function--influences of maturity and protective treatment

Renal tubular cells are involved both in secretion and in reabsorption processes within the kidney. Normally, most xenobiotics are secreted into the urine at the basolateral membrane of the tubular cell, whereas amino acids are reabsorbed quantitatively at the luminal side. Under different pathological or experimental circumstances, these transport steps may be changed, e.g., they may be reduced by renal impairment (reduction of kidney mass, renal ischemia, administration of nephrotoxins) or they may be enhanced after stimulation of transport carriers. Furthermore, a distinct interrelationship exists between excretory functions of the kidney and the liver. That means liver injury can influence renal transport systems also (hepato-renal syndrome). In this review, the following aspects were included: based upon general information concerning different transport pathways for xenobiotics and amino acids within kidney cells and upon a brief characterization of methods for testing impairment of kidney function, the maturation of renal transport and its stimulation are described. Similarities and differences between the postnatal development of kidney function and the increase of renal transport capacity after suitable stimulatory treatment by, for example, various hormones or xenobiotics are reviewed. Especially, renal transport in acute renal failure is described for individuals of different ages. Depending upon the maturity of kidney function, age differences in susceptibility to kidney injury occur: if energy-requiring processes are involved in the transport of the respective substance, then adults, in general, are more susceptible to renal failure than young individuals, because in immature organisms, anaerobic energy production predominates within the kidney. On the other hand, adult animals can better compensate for the loss of renal tissue (partial nephrectomy). With respect to stimulation of renal transport capacity after repeated pretreatment with suitable substances, age differences also exist: most stimulatory schedules are more effective in young, developing individuals than in mature animals. Therefore, the consequences of the stimulation of renal transport can be different in animals of different ages and are discussed in detail. Furthermore, the extent of stimulation is different for the transporters located at the basolateral and at the luminal membranes: obviously the tubular secretion at the contraluminal membrane can be stimulated more effectively than reabsorption processes at the luminal side.