Nonspecific motor disorder of the esophagus: a real disorder or a manometric curiosity?

Evaluation of a Solid Bolus Suitable for Esophageal Scintigraphy

This study was designed to select a suitable solid bolus for esophageal scintigraphy. Optimally, a bolus should leave minimal residual buccal and pharyngeal activity after being swallowed. We compared the oropharyngeal behavior of three boluses, i.e., omelette, egg white, and paté of 1- and 3-ml volume. Thirty patients without dysfunction of the upper esophageal sphincter were recruited for the study. Scintigraphy interpretation was based on the results of condensed images and time activity curves. A total of 108 oropharyngeal transits were analyzed. First we determined the most appropriate volume (1 or 3 ml) of paté, omelette, and egg white (i.e., the volume with the least residual oropharyngeal activity). Buccal or pharyngeal bolus retention occurred significantly less frequently with 1 ml paté than 3 ml (p = 0.03) and also less frequently with 3 ml egg white than with 1 ml egg white (p = 0.03), and the mean buccal bolus retention index was lower using 3 ml omelette than 1 ml omelette (p = 0.03). Then we identified the most suitable of the three selected boluses. Both oral and pharyngeal residues were higher for paté (1 ml) than for omelette (p = 0.02 and 0.05), and pharyngeal residue was significantly lower for omelette (3 ml) than for egg white (3 ml) (p = 0.02). In conclusion, a 3-ml bolus of radiolabeled omelette seems to be the most suitable bolus for exploration of esophageal transit, and its use could enhance the potential of scintigraphy in the assessment of esophageal disorders.

Long-term observation and functional state of the esophagus after primary repair of spontaneous esophageal rupture

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcome of patients treated for a spontaneous esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome) is seldom reported.

METHODS

From 1989 to 2004, 62 esophageal perforations were treated in a single institution. Eighteen patients presented with a spontaneous esophageal rupture. Among them, 15 could be treated with a transthoracic primary repair and constituted the material of the present study. A chart review was performed with special attention to survival, residual symptoms, and anatomic and motility disorders.

RESULTS

Three patients died postoperatively (20%). At last follow-up, 10 patients were alive and 2 had died from unrelated causes. At a median delay of 13 months (3 to 74), 7 patients accepted to undergo complementary investigations. None of them had any anatomic abnormality as checked by barium swallow. Six patients complained of mild symptoms from gastroesophageal reflux. Six patients (85%) presented with esophageal motility disorders on manometry and 4 (54%) had nocturne chronic reflux disease on pH monitoring. Two patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography, of which one presented with a focal absence of one layer of the esophageal wall within the area of the suture. With time, no patient experienced recurrence, but one developed a cancer in the cervical esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that esophageal functional disorders are the rule after primary repair of a Boerhaave's syndrome. Whether or not these findings are causal, coincidental, or related to the surgical treatment remains unclear. However, performance of routine postoperative explorations is strongly encouraged for a better understanding of this challenging condition.

Effect of subtotal colectomy on gastric emptying of a solid meal in slow-transit constipation

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic slow-transit constipation is considered a panenteral disease in which patients may have delayed gastric emptying. The effects of total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis on upper gut motility are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate gastric emptying in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation before and after subtotal colectomy.

METHODS

Gastric emptying of a solid meal was studied by scintigraphic technique in 11 patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation. The total colonic transit time was more than 72 hours in all patients studied, with delay in transit in all segments of the colon. The gastric emptying test was repeated 3 to 6 months after total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in ten of these patients. Before and after surgery, patients filled out a questionnaire to record upper gut symptoms.

RESULTS

Solid gastric emptying was delayed (T1/2 > upper limit of normal) in 7 of 11 patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation. Gastric emptying T1/2 was almost similar before and after surgery. Mean +/- standard deviation was 142 +/- 91 minutes before surgery and 146 +/- 67 minutes after surgery. Symptoms of vomiting and belching improved significantly after surgery. Symptoms of nausea, bloating, and pyrosis also decreased, but these changes failed to reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Despite a reduction in upper gut symptoms, total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis does not improve delayed gastric emptying in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation.

Esophageal motility in the assessment of esophageal function

Esophageal manometry assesses lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and its relaxation. In addition, it detects the ability of the esophageal body to initiate a peristaltic contraction and the contraction's amplitude in response to a water bolus. The study is indicated in patients with symptoms suggestive of an esophageal motor disorder and to assist in the diagnosis of some miscellaneous disorders. The most common disorders diagnosed by esophageal manometry are the primary motility disorders, such as achalasia. Manometry is indicated in the subset of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are being considered for antireflux surgery or have symptoms after antireflux surgery.

Autonomic dysfunction in non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility

OBJECTIVE

Non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility are common manometric findings in patients presenting with non-cardiac chest pain, dysphagia, odynophagia, regurgitation and symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Impairment of vagal function has been reported in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and achalasia. The role of autonomic dysfunction in patients with non-specific oesophageal disorders is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess autonomic function in patients with non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility.

METHOD

An automated computerized system (AUTOCAFT) was used to evaluate autonomic function in 62 patients presenting with non-cardiac chest pain and associated oesophageal symptoms. Cardiovascular reflex responses to deep breathing, Valsalva manoeuvre, posture and sustained handgrip were measured and results compared with 14 sex- and age-matched control subjects.

RESULTS

Forty percent of patients with non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility proved to have significant abnormalities of vagal function. There was also a high incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be autonomic dysfunction in patients with non-specific oesophageal motility disorders. Autonomic function tests may prove to be a useful tool in the assessment of oesophageal function.

Five-year audit of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-manometry in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Esophageal function testing was developed to aid diagnosis in patients with negative endoscopy. Although combined 24-h esophageal pH-manometry is now commercially available, its routine clinical effectiveness has not yet been studied.

METHODS

From 1992 to 1996 we evaluated 303 consecutive patients who were first-time referrals to our unit for 24-h esophageal pH-manometry. The referral indications were gastroesophageal reflux disease, 47.2%; dysphagia, 18.5%; non-cardiac chest pain, 14.9%; connective tissue disease, 13.2%; and symptomatic patients after antireflux surgery, 6.3%.

RESULTS

Overall, esophageal function testing altered the diagnosis of 44% of the patients, confirmed it in 38%, and specifically changed the management of 66%. The final clinical 'diagnosis' was reflux disease, 54% (32% with non-specific esophageal motility disorder); connective tissue disease, 9.9%; achalasia, 9.6%; other specific esophageal motility disorders, 3.3%; non-specific esophageal motility disorders, 6.9%; and normal, 16.2%. The cost per testing was estimated to be US$305 and per change in management US$465.

CONCLUSION

Combined 24-h pH-manometry has been shown to be a useful and cost-effective test for the management of selected patients in whom the primary investigation was insufficient.

Nonspecific esophageal motility disorders in children without gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific esophageal motility disorders (NEMDs) have been identified in up to 50% of adults with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. This study sought to determine the incidence of NEMDs in children with upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms and to evaluate the clinical course of pediatric patients with these manometric abnormalities.

METHODS

The study involved 154 children aged 4 to 18 years (mean age, 11.6+/-2.6 years [SE]) who had upper gastrointestinal, swallowing-related symptoms. The children were evaluated by 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring, esophageal manometry, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

RESULTS

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was diagnosed by pH study in 109 (71%) of 154 patients, and examination of biopsy specimens demonstrated esophagitis in 70 children with GER. Results of esophageal manometry were abnormal in 30 (67%) of 45 children without GER. A variety of motility disorders were diagnosed in 17 of the patients without GER, whereas NEMDs were diagnosed in the remaining 13 children (mean age, 10.6+/-2.7 years; 10 boys, 3 girls). Patients with GER showed normal esophageal wave propagation; however, mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower in patients with GER than in children with NEMDs. The children with NEMDs exhibited a diverse array of symptoms, including esophageal food impaction in 4 of the 13 patients. During a 36.2+/-4.3-month follow-up period, no correlation was found between therapeutic intervention and clinical course in the 13 patients with NEMDs. Symptomatic improvement occurred in 6 of 13 patients, including 3 children for whom no pharmacologic therapy was prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that NEMDs represent a common group of esophageal manometric abnormalities in children with upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms and without GER. Food impaction appears to be a relatively frequent complication, and NEMDs should be considered in children who have this finding.

The effect of healing oesophagitis on oesophageal motor function as determined by oesophageal scintigraphy and ambulatory oesophageal motility/pH monitoring

BACKGROUND

Oesophagitis has been shown by standard manometry to be associated with impaired oesophageal motility, but it remains unclear if this abnormality improves with healing of oesophagitis.

AIM

To determine if healing of oesophagitis improves oesophageal motility using solid bolus oesophageal transit scintigraphy and combined ambulatory oesophageal motility/pH monitoring.

METHODS

Patients with grade II-III oesophagitis underwent ambulatory motility/pH monitoring (using a Konigsberg catheter with four pressure transducers at 5 cm intervals) and solid bolus scintigraphy before and after treatment with omeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 8-14 weeks.

RESULTS

Three (11%) of the 28 patients failed to heal. Initial scintigraphy was abnormal in 18 (67%) of 27 patients (one refused scintigraphy). Twenty-three of the 25 healed patients had repeat studies showing no significant change in the number which were abnormal (16 (64%), P = 1.0) or the overall oesophageal transit time (P = 0.65). Due to intolerance of the technique, only 11 patients had ambulatory motility/pH performed both before and after healing, giving the study 90% power to detect a 5 mmHg increase in peristaltic amplitude. No significant improvement was seen in any motility or pH parameter after healing of oesophagitis.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of oesophageal motility showed no improvement in peristaltic activity after healing of oesophagitis, suggesting that the abnormal motility is either a primary disorder or an irreversible consequence of mucosal damage.

Double-blind placebo-controlled study of cisapride in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder accompanied by delayed esophageal transit

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NEMD) represents a difficult therapeutic challenge because of the heterogeneous nature of the esophageal motor functions. We studied the effects of cisapride on the esophageal symptoms and esophageal motor function in a group of patients with NEMD showing delayed esophageal transit.

METHODS

Seventy eligible patients were entered into a 4-week, double-blind randomized comparison of 10 mg of cisapride or placebo, four times daily. Symptom assessment, esophageal manometry after wet swallows, and esophageal scintigraphy after intake of a liquid and solid bolus were performed in each patient before and after treatment.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment cisapride significantly increased the prevalence of esophageal peristaltic contractions (percentage of total contractions, P < 0.05 versus base line and placebo) and significantly improved esophageal emptying of the solid bolus (P < 0.05 versus placebo) but not of the liquid bolus. Placebo did not have any significant effects versus base line on these variables. Both placebo and cisapride improved the distal esophageal amplitude versus base line (no significant intergroup differences). Symptom scores were significantly reduced after 4 weeks of treatment versus base line in both groups (no significant intergroup differences except for heartburn and regurgitation, P < 0.05). On global evaluation of treatment, significantly more patients in the cisapride group were rated as markedly or moderately improved, when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study showed that cisapride is effective and well tolerated in patients with NEMD accompanied by delayed esophageal transit. Symptomatic improvement may possibly be related to its beneficial action on the esophageal body by increasing the number of peristaltic contractions and esophageal emptying of solids.

Optimal evaluation of patients with nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia. Manometry, scintigraphy, or videoesophagography?

The aims of this study were to compare diagnostic accuracy, cost, and patient tolerance of videoesophagography and esophageal transit scintigraphy to esophageal manometry in the evaluation of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia. Eighty-nine consecutive patients underwent videoesophagography, scintigraphy, and manometry. The sensitivities for diagnosing specific esophageal motility disorders, using esophageal manometry as the standard, were 75% and 68% for videoesophagography and scintigraphy, respectively, with positive predictive accuracies of 96% and 95% for achalasia, 100% and 67% for diffuse esophageal spasm, 100% and 75% for scleroderma, 50% and 67% for isolated LES dysfunction, 57% and 48% for nonspecific esophageal motility disorders, and 70% and 68% for normal esophageal motility. The cost for videoesophagography is less than that for either manometry or scintigraphy. Both videoesophagography and scintigraphy were better tolerated than manometry. It is concluded that videoesophagography and scintigraphy accurately diagnose primary esophageal motility disorders, achalasia, scleroderma, and diffuse esophageal spasm, but are less accurate in distinguishing nonspecific esophageal motility disorders from normal. When considering accuracy, cost, and patient acceptance, these findings suggest that videoesophagography is a useful initial diagnostic study for the evaluation of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia.

Esophageal motility and reflux testing. State-of-the-art and clinical role in the twenty-first century

Esophageal function testing has an important place in the investigation of a significant proportion of patients with esophageal disorders. Appropriate application of these tests requires a proper understanding of their capabilities and limitations and careful primary assessment by other modalities. Esophageal manometry is most useful for assessing significant troublesome dysphagia in the absence of organic obstruction. Esophageal pH monitoring is an important adjunct to clinical assessment and endoscopy in the diagnosis of reflux disease. Although it is the gold standard for the measurement of esophageal acid exposure and assessment of the relationship of symptoms to reflux, there are weakness in both of these functions that should be understood when applying the test to the diagnosis of reflux disease.

Comparison between intraluminal multiple electric impedance measurement and manometry in the human oesophagus

Conventional oesophageal manometry and intraluminal electrical impedance measurement were simultaneously applied in eight healthy volunteers to study the effect of wet and semisolid bolus viscosities on oesophageal motility and bolus transit. Contraction front velocity measured by electrical impedance and manometry were identical for wet and semisolid swallows and highly associated. Bolus front velocity as measured by electrical impedance was significantly faster than contraction front velocity in both wet and semisolid swallows. Bolus front velocity during semisolid swallows was significantly slower compared to wet swallows. It is concluded that intraluminal electrical impedance measurement is a reliable technique to detect oesophageal motility as well as to differentiate between transit of wet and semisolid bolus consistencies.

Role of nuclear medicine in evaluating patients with suspected gastrointestinal motility disorders

Functional symptoms caused by gastrointestinal motility disorders are relatively common in the general population. Knowledge of the relationship between symptoms and the underlying gastrointestinal dysmotility provides physicians with a framework for successful evaluation and treatment of patients with possible motor disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Scintigraphy provides for noninvasive and quantitative assessment of physiological transit throughout the gastrointestinal tract, and it is extremely useful for diagnosing gastrointestinal motor dysfunction. The wide range of scintigraphic studies now available supplement other diagnostic tests for evaluation of all segments of the gastrointestinal tract.