Long-term follow-up of chronic hepatitis B patients treated with interferon alfa

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection: 2018 Guidelines from the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease and Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important public health problem in Canada. In keeping with evolving evidence and understanding of HBV pathogenesis, the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease periodically publishes HBV management guidelines. The goals of the 2018 guidelines are to (1) highlight the public health impact of HBV infection in Canada and the need to improve diagnosis and linkage to care, (2) recommend current best-practice guidelines for treatment of HBV, (3) summarize the key HBV laboratory diagnostic tests, and (4) review evidence on HBV management in special patient populations and include more detail on management of HBV in pediatric populations. An overview of novel HBV tests and therapies for HBV in development is provided to highlight the recent advances in HBV clinical research. The aim and scope of these guidelines are to serve as an up-to-date, comprehensive resource for Canadian health care providers in the management of HBV infection.

Patients with interferon-induced HBeAg seroconversion have a higher risk of HBV reactivation and HBeAg seroreversion

PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether chronic hepatitis B patients who undergo interferon (IFN)-induced hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion have a higher risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and HBeAg seroreversion than those with spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion.

METHODS

A total of 80 and 251 non-cirrhotic patients with interferon-induced and spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion, respectively, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared to spontaneous HBeAg seroconverters, more IFN-induced HBeAg seroconverters were males (p = 0.004). For all patients, the IFN-induced HBeAg seroconverters faced a higher risk of HBV reactivation and HBeAg seroreversion than spontaneous HBeAg seroconverters (p < 0.001). For spontaneous HBeAg seroconverters, age at HBeAg seroconversion, male sex, HBV genotype C, and pre-S deletions were independent predictors of HBV reactivation. For IFN-induced HBeAg seroconverters, older age at baseline and HBV genotype C were independent predictors of HBV reactivation. To determine whether the difference in the rates of HBV reactivation or HBeAg seroreversion between two groups was age-dependent, patients were grouped and analyzed according to their age at HBeAg seroconversion (20-30, 31-39, ≥40 years). IFNs treatment was an independent factor in HBV reactivation and HBeAg seroreversion only in the groups of patients 31-39 and ≥40 years of age, but not in the group of patients 20-30 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-induced rather than spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion was associated with higher risk of HBV reactivation and HBeAg seroreversion, especially in patients who were older than 30 years at HBeAg seroconversion.

Management of chronic hepatitis B: Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver consensus guidelines

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a dynamic disease that is influenced by host and virological factors. The management of CHB has become more complex with the increasing use of long-term oral nucleos⁄tide analogue antiviral therapies and the availability of novel diagnostic assays. Furthermore, there is often a lack of robust data to guide optimal management such as the selection of therapy, duration of treatment, potential antiviral side effects and the treatment of special populations. In November 2011, the Canadian Liver Foundation and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver convened a consensus conference to review the literature and analyze published data, including other international expert guidelines on CHB management. The proceedings of the consensus conference are summarized and provide updated clinical practice guidelines to assist Canadian health care providers in the prevention, diagnosis, assessment and treatment of CHB.

Long-term outcomes of add-on adefovir dipivoxil therapy to ongoing lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

AIM

  Add-on adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) therapy has been a standard rescue treatment for patients with lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B, but the overall benefits of long-term add-on ADV therapy are still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficiency of add-on ADV treatment and to explore predictive factors associated with it.

METHODS

  A total of 158 patients with LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B were included in this retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study in Japan. After confirming LAM resistance, ADV was added to LAM treatment. Three types of events were considered as outcomes: virological response, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) clearance and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization. Virological response was defined as serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels of less than 3 log copies/mL. Baseline factors contributing to these outcomes were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

  The median total duration of ADV treatment was 41 months (range, 6-84). The rate of virological response was 90.8% at 4 years of treatment; HBeAg clearance and ALT normalization were achieved by 34.0% and 82.7%, respectively, at the end of follow up. Each outcome had different predictive factors: baseline HBV DNA and albumin level were predictive factors for virological response, history of interferon therapy and ALT level for HBeAg clearance, and sex and baseline albumin level for ALT normalization.

CONCLUSION

  Long-term add-on ADV treatment was highly effective in LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients in terms of virological and biochemical responses. Lower HBV replication and lower albumin level at baseline led to better outcomes.

Causes of and prevention strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a challenging malignancy of global importance. It is associated with a high rate of mortality and its prevalence in the United States and in Western Europe is increasing. Cirrhosis is the strongest and the most common known risk factor for HCC, usually due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. However, different lines of evidence identify in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) a possible relevant risk factor for occurrence of HCC. Given the continuing increase in the prevalence of obesity and diabetes, the incidence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related HCC may also be expected to increase, and a potential role of behavior treatment and/or insulin-sensitizing drugs can be envisaged. Vaccination against HBV is the most efficient primary prevention measure currently available to reduce the HCC incidence and mortality in high-incidence areas, while data on the role of interferon (IFN) and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) are still controversial. The pooling of data from the literature suggests a slight preventive effect of antiviral therapy on HCC development in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, but the preventive effect is limited to sustained virological responders.

Current status of antiviral therapy for hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major public health problem affecting up to 400 million people globally. Complications of CHB including liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma result in 1.2 million deaths per year, making CHB the 10th leading cause of mortality worldwide. The natural history of CHB is variable and complex. The past decade witnessed important developments for the therapy of hepatitis B and marked the new era of oral therapy. The ultimate goal of CHB therapy is to arrest the progression of liver injury and to prevent the development of liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, six agents are approved for the treatment of CHB. Each of these agents, given as monotherapy, has been shown to produce virological, biochemical, and histological benefits for both HBeAg positive and negative CHB. There are, however, limitations in spite of their efficacy. The significant side-effect profile of interferon, for example, limits its long-term use. The approved oral agents are tolerable with prolonged use but drug resistance could limit long-term monotherapy. To date, combination therapy with nucleoside analogue and pegylated interferon or two nucleos(t)ide analogues given for one year does not show superiority in durability of response compared to monotherapy. Ongoing research effort is critical to identify the ideal hepatitis B therapy that is safe, effective, and produces durable response with a finite course of therapy. It is equally important to conduct a well designed, prospective natural history study to identify predictors of disease progression. This will accurately guide treatment strategy for this important disease.

[HBsAg seroclearance: prognostic value for the response to treatment and the long-term outcome]

Chronic hepatitis B is a major cause of liver disease worldwide, ranking as the first cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is usually used as a qualitative marker for the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. HBsAg clearance is the closest to cure outcome as one can expect to achieve in hepatitis B. Support for this comes from natural history studies demonstrating increased length of survival, lower rates of hepatic decompensation, reduction in the frequency of hepatocellular carcinoma, and regression of liver fibrosis in patients who clear HBsAg. HBsAg seroclearance may occur spontaneously at a yearly incidence of 1-2%, preceded usually by a long period of inactive disease. Interferon treatment enhanced HBsAg seroclearance by approximately three-fold in western studies and sixfold in Asian studies compared with non-treated patients. Pegylated interferon induced a 10-15% yearly rate of HBsAg seroclearance in patients who developed sustained virological response in clinical trials. By contrast, treatment with nucleos (t) ides analogues did not significantly affect the rate of HBsAg seroclearance, especially in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) - negative disease. Recently, serum HBsAg has been shown to be a surrogate marker of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) concentration in the liver. Quantification of serum HBsAg has also been recently shown to be a promising tool for monitoring virologic response in HBeAg-negative patients treated with pegylated interferon.

Hepatitis B virus genotype B results in better immediate, late and sustained responses to peginterferon-alfa in hepatitis-B-e-antigen-positive patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study investigated outcome predictors in hepatitis-B-e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a.

METHODS

A total of 88 HBeAg-positive patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a for 6 months and followed up for at least 24 weeks were prospectively analyzed. Precore and core promoter genes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) were sequenced from the serial serum samples of 88 patients.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks of follow up, 38.6% and 28.4% of patients achieved HBeAg clearance and combined response, respectively. Multivariate analysis disclosed that pretreatment HBeAg sample to cut-off (S/Co) ratio ≤ 200, alanine aminotransferase > 200 IU/mL, HBV genotype B and T1846 were independent factors for HBeAg clearance, and HBeAg S/Co ratio ≤ 200 and HBV genotype B were major determinants for combined response. HBeAg S/Co ratio ≤ 10 at week 12 of therapy was the useful factor for treatment response and had a greater power (P = 0.012) to predict HBeAg clearance than HBV DNA. Patients with HBeAg clearance had a higher frequency of A1896 mutation at baseline and during therapy than those without HBeAg clearance, and the frequency of A1896 decreased during treatment. During follow up, delayed HBeAg seroconversion and reactivation of HBV after HBeAg clearance were observed in eight non-responders and 20 patients with HBeAg clearance, respectively. HBV genotype B was a significant factor to predict both responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment HBeAg S/Co ratio ≤ 200 and HBV genotype B were major determinants for treatment response to peginterferon. Genotype-B-infected patients had higher probability of delayed HBeAg clearance and sustained response. Rapid decrease of HBeAg titer was useful on treatment predictor.

Management of hepatitis B: Consensus of the Japan Society of Hepatology 2009

Recently, much progress has been made in the field of hepatitis B, such as natural history of the disease in relation to the amount of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, genotypes of HBV influencing the natural course and treatment effects, mutations of HBV influencing the severity of the disease and development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and antiviral treatment such as nucleos(t)ide analogues and pegylated interferon. To make the consensus for the diagnosis, management and treatment of hepatitis B, a meeting was held during 45th annual meeting of Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) in June 2009. In the meeting, recommendations and informative statements were discussed on the following subjects: (i) natural history of HBV infection; (ii) clinical implication of HBV genotypes; (iii) HBV mutations and their potential impact on pathogenesis of HBV infection; (iv) indications for antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B; (v) nucleos(t)ide analogues for chronic hepatitis B; and (vi) interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The presenters reviewed the data on these subjects and proposed the consensus statements and recommendations. These statements were discussed among the organizers and presenters, and were approved by the participants of the meeting. In the current report, the relevant data were reviewed and the 12 consensus statements and nine recommendations on chronic hepatitis B were described.

Quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen: a new concept for the management of chronic hepatitis B

HBsAg is a very important clinical test that might not only indicate active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection but might also be used to predict clinical and treatment outcome. Clearance of HBsAg in patients with chronic HBV infection is associated with a much better clinical outcome, although surveillance for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should continue. HBV DNA quantification is currently used for selecting candidates for therapy, monitoring response to therapy and detecting the emergence of drug resistance. Assays for HBsAg quantification are less expensive than HBV DNA and fully automated with a high throughput capacity. HBsAg titering may be a useful tool to manage patients with chronic HBV, to more clearly define which patients may, and more importantly, may not, benefit from treatment. Baseline and on-treatment HBsAg quantification may help to refine future treatment algorithms for both immune-modulator therapy and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Both HBV markers provide complementary information on the status of HBV infection. However, the relevance of serum HBsAg levels and its use as a reliable replacement for both covalently closed circular DNA and HBV DNA remain unclear.

[Add on lamivudine to adefovir monotherapy for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Add on adefovir (ADV) to ongoing lamivudine (LAM) has been recommended as a standard therapy for the treatment of LAM resistance. In the past, switch to ADV monotherapy was suggested as an option for the treatment of LAM resistance, leading to frequent development of ADV resistance. However, ADV monotherapy has been still used in LAM-resistant patients because of low cost in Korea. The aims of this study were to evaluate the virologic response and virologic breakthrough during adding on LAM in LAM-resistant patients receiving ADV monotherapy.

METHODS

The study population comprised 99 patients with LAM-resistance. We divided them into 3 groups (Group 1: switch to ADV monotherapy, N=58, Group 2: add on ADV to ongoing LAM, N=25, Group 3: add on LAM to ADV monotherapy, N=16). HBV DNA levels were assessed at baseline and every 3 months during therapy. Serum HBV DNA levels were measured by bDNA assay or the COBAS TaqMan(TM) HBV test.

RESULTS

The median treatment duration for group 1, group 2, and group 3 was 42.0, 20.6, and 31.8 (18.7 mon. of ADV13.1 mon. of LAM) months, respectively. Cumulative rate of virologic breakthrough in group 1 was 5.2%, 19.0%, and 25.9% at 12, 24, and 36 months of treatment, respectively. Virologic breakthrough was not detected in group 2 and group 3 (p=0.016, group 1 vs. group 2 or 3). In group 3, median serum HBV DNA levels were 4.22 log10 copies/mL prior to LAM administration. Median serum HBV DNA changes from baseline (log10 copies/mL) were -0.91, -1.93, -1.87 and -1.74 at week 12, 24, 36 and 48, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Later add on LAM to ADV monotherapy prevented the development of ADV resistance in patients with LAM resistance effectively, comparable to ADV add on to continuing LAM therapy.

Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during chronic HBV infection

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in chronic HBV infection occurs at an annual incidence of 1-2%. The long-term outcome after HBsAg seroclearance is excellent if there is no pre-existing cirrhosis or viral superinfection. For this reason, HBsAg seroclearance has attracted recent interest in both long-term studies of the natural history of HBV infection and in patients receiving antiviral therapy. Here, we review a diverse range of studies investigating spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance in varied groups of patients and consider the many predictive factors - of both viral and host origin - for seroclearance. Studies to assess the effects of antiviral therapy, and in particular interferon treatment, are also discussed together with virological, biochemical and histological profiles following HBsAg seroclearance and the long-term outcomes.

Predictors of treatment response in chronic hepatitis B

The ultimate goal of treatment for chronic hepatitis B is to reduce liver-related complications and mortality. Sustained hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance 6-12 months after stopping treatment are the short-term surrogate outcomes for interferon or peginterferon therapy. As most patients require long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment, which also has the risk of drug resistance in the case of incomplete viral suppression, maintained hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression to an undetectable level is the appropriate surrogate outcome. Because no antiviral treatment is perfect, it is desirable for treatment response to be predicted and the treatment regimen modified accordingly. At baseline, high ALT and low HBV DNA levels can predict response to both (peg)interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Genotype A HBV responds best to peginterferon but HBV genotype has no predictive value for nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. HBV DNA is a good on-treatment predictor of response for nucleos(t)ide analogues but not for (peg)interferon. The data supporting the use of quantitative HBsAg and HBeAg to predict response to peginterferon is stronger than that for nucleos(t)ide analogues. In conclusion, predictors of response are useful to provide the most appropriate antiviral therapy to the most suitable patients, in order to achieve the best response and improve the clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis B patients.

Factors that predict response of patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B to peginterferon-alfa

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-alfa results in sustained response in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and has considerable side effects. We analyzed data from the 2 largest global trials of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B to determine which are most likely to respond to PEG-IFN-alfa therapy.

METHODS

The study included 542 patients treated with PEG-IFN-alfa-2a (180 microg/wk, 48 wk) and 266 patients treated with PEG-IFN-alfa-2b (100 microg/wk, 52 wk). Eighty-seven patients were excluded, leaving 721 patients for analysis. A sustained response was defined as HBeAg loss and HBV-DNA level less than 2.0 x 10(3) IU/mL 6 months after treatment. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of sustained response and a multivariable model was constructed.

RESULTS

HBV genotype, high levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT; >or=2 x upper limit of normal), low levels of HBV DNA (<2.0 x 10(8) IU/mL), female sex, older age, and absence of previous IFN therapy predicted a sustained response. Genotype A patients with high ALT and/or low HBV-DNA levels had a high predicted probability (>30%) of a sustained response. The strongest predictors of response were a high level of ALT in genotype B patients and a low level of HBV DNA in genotype C patients. Genotype D patients had a low chance of sustained response, irrespective of ALT or HBV-DNA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The best candidates for a sustained response to PEG-IFN-alfa are genotype A patients with high levels of ALT or low levels of HBV DNA, and genotypes B and C patients who have both high levels of ALT and low HBV DNA. Genotype D patients have a low chance of sustained response.

Early HBeAg loss during peginterferon alpha-2b therapy predicts HBsAg loss: results of a long-term follow-up study in chronic hepatitis B patients

OBJECTIVES

Treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha-2b results in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss in 36% of patients at 6 months post treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether a long-term response to PEG-IFN is dependent on the timing of HBeAg loss.

METHODS

A total of 91 patients treated with PEG-IFN alpha-2b alone (100 microg per week) and 81 patients treated with PEG-IFN alpha-2b and lamivudine (100 mg/day) for 52 weeks were enrolled in this study. Patients were initially followed up at 4-week intervals and had one additional long-term follow-up (LTFU) visit (mean: 3.03+/-0.77 years 26 weeks post treatment).

RESULTS

Of the 172 patients included, 78 patients (46%) did not have loss of HBeAg, 47 (27%) lost HBeAg within 32 weeks, and 47 patients (27%) had loss of HBeAg after week 32. At LTFU, patients with HBeAg loss< or =32 weeks had hepatitis B virus DNA of <400 copies/ml significantly more often than did those who lost HBeAg after week 32 (47 vs. 21%, respectively; P=0.009). Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negativity was also observed significantly more often in patients with early HBeAg loss (36 vs. 4%, respectively, P<0.001). Early HBeAg loss tended to occur more often in patients treated with PEG-IFN and lamivudine combination therapy than in those treated with PEG-IFN alone (35 vs. 21%; P=0.10), as did HBsAg loss (15 vs. 8%; P=0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Early PEG-IFN-induced HBeAg loss results in a high likelihood of HBsAg loss and may be associated with more profound viral suppression during the first 32 weeks of therapy in patients treated with lamivudine combinations.

Interferons and their use in persistent viral infections

In 2007, the world celebrated the 50th anniversary of the discovery of interferon (IFN) by Isaacs and Lindenmann. Subsequently, the IFN-alpha gene was cloned, fully sequenced and IFN-alpha was produced in recombinant form. Recombinant IFN-alpha is now used as the basis for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection and can also be used to treat certain forms of chronic hepatitis B virus infections. IFNs have also been used in other viral infections, although with less success. The antiviral mechanisms of IFNs are reviewed in this chapter as well as the utility of IFNs in the treatment of persistent viral infections.

Predictive factors associated with the progression to hepatic failure caused by lamivudine-resistant HBV

The aims of this study were to select the patients with a potential for progression to hepatic failure due to lamivudine-resistant HBV and to standardize the treatment for patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV. Patients (n = 47) with reactivated hepatitis due to lamivudine-resistant HBV were classified into two groups, with and without potential for progression to hepatic failure, according to the criteria using the data of serum bilirubin level and prothrombin activity after the reactivated hepatitis. Multivariate analysis showed that prothrombin activity at the initiation of lamivudine therapy was related to the deterioration of the liver function after the emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV (P = 0.0025, 95%CI 0.8269-0.9601). We assume that earlier additional or substitutive treatment with other antiviral agent, such as adefovir dipivoxil, should be recommended when the lamivudine-resistant HBV is detected in patients with the history of decompensated liver disease before the administration of lamivudine, even when hepatitis has not been reactivated yet.

[Treatment of chronic hepatitis B]

SUMMARY

In recent years, marked progress has been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Several agents have been approved: interferon alpha-(IFN), pegylated interferon alpha2a (PEG-IFN alpha2a), lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and recently, tenofovir. Each drug has advantages and limitations. IFN and PEG-IFN alpha2a have the advantage of inducing a sustained virologic response after a defined, limited course of treatment. However, these drugs are only effective in a minority of patients and have frequent side effects. Analogues have the advantage of being administered orally, with good safety profiles and a potent antiviral effect. However, these drugs need to be administered indefinitely since withdrawal of therapy is generally associated with reactivation, and a sustained response is uncommon except in HBeAg positive patients who develop HBe seroconversion. In case of HBe seroconversion, therapy should usually be continued for at least another 24 weeks. The efficacy of lamivudine is limited by the emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV. Adefovir is associated with a moderate incidence of resistance but its antiviral effect is not optimal. Entecavir has shown to be more effective with a favourable safety profile and a low incidence of resistance. Telbivudine is more potent and has a lower rate of resistance than lamivudine but the resistance rate is significantly higher than other approved drugs. Tenofovir has a potent antiviral effect with a good resistance profile. The future of chronic hepatitis B therapy appears to be different drug combinations. Normally the advantage of drug combinations versus monotherapy should be additive or synergistic antiviral effects and a decrease in viral resistance. Unfortunately, there are few data available and none of the evaluated analogue combinations have been shown to be better than monotherapy. The only combination which has shown a synergistic effect is of pegylated interferon alpha2a with lamivudine. Therefore, combinations of pegylated interferon with the most potent analogues need to be evaluated. The ultimate goal of therapy is HBsAg seroconversion which is more often observed with interferon. Indeed, quantification of serum HBsAg will be a useful tool to predict the treatment outcome. More potent drugs and new combinations as well as understanding the mechanisms of viral resistance should be evaluated to improve the efficacy of treatment.

Tailored regimen of interferon alpha for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a prospective controlled study

The response to interferon-alpha treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B under the current protocol is not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to try an alternative approach to improve treatment outcome. Of 374 HBeAg-positive patients, 127 of them received 5 million units of interferon-alpha thrice weekly for 6 months and constituted the control group, while 247 in the study group received the same dosage but the duration of treatment was tailored. The study protocol provided for continuation of treatment if HBV DNA levels were continuously decreasing. The treatment ended when viral, antigenic and biochemical endpoints were reached or when HBV DNA levels were no longer decreasing. The median length of tailored treatment was 10 (range 6-24) months. The end-of-treatment response rates were 39.3% and 23.6% (P = 0.002), and after 12-month, follow-up, the sustained response rates were 40.5% and 28.3% (P = 0.013) in the study and control groups, respectively. Excluding the patients who dropped out, 228 and 115 completed a median of 40- and 44-month-long follow-up; the long-term response was thus 45.3% and 33.1% (P = 0.014) in the respective groups. Interferon-alpha treatment tailored in length demonstrated significantly increased efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Sustained HBeAg and HBsAg loss after long-term follow-up of HBeAg-positive patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term sustainability of response in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha-2b alone or in combination with lamivudine.

METHODS

All 266 patients enrolled in the HBV99-01 study were offered participation in a long-term follow-up (LTFU) study. Patients were treated with PEG-IFN alpha-2b (100 mug/wk) alone or in combination with lamivudine (100 mg/day) for 52 weeks. Initial response was defined as HBeAg negativity at 26 weeks posttreatment. For the LTFU study, patients had one additional visit after the initial study (mean interval, 3.0 +/- 0.8 years).

RESULTS

Of 266 patients enrolled in the initial study, 172 (65%) participated in the LTFU study. At LTFU, HBeAg and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negativity were observed in 37% and 11% of 172 patients, respectively. Sixty-four patients were classified as initial responders and 108 as nonresponders. Among the initial responders, sustained HBeAg negativity and HBsAg loss were observed in 81% and 30%, respectively. Significantly higher rates of HBeAg negativity were observed in genotype A-infected initial responders compared with those with genotype non-A (96% vs 76%; P = .06) as well as HBsAg loss (58% vs 11%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

HBeAg loss after treatment with PEG-IFN alpha-2b alone or in combination with lamivudine is sustained in the majority of patients and is associated with a high likelihood of HBsAg loss, particularly in genotype A-infected patients. Therefore, PEG-IFN alpha-2b remains an important treatment option in this era of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy.

Reviews for APASL guidelines: immunomodulator therapy of chronic hepatitis B

The primary aim of immunomodulator therapy is to help the natural human immune system to mount a defense against hepatitis B virus. IFN-alpha has been used for the treatment of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B for over two decades and has been shown to be effective in suppressing HBV replication and in inducing serological response leading to long-term clinical benefits. IFN-alpha has been used in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis with comparable or better response to that in non-cirrhotic patients. IFN-alpha therapy in patients with cirrhosis has a similar side effect profile as in those without cirrhosis. However, IFN-alpha is contraindicated in patients with overt or decompensated cirrhosis. Pegylated IFN-alpha has been shown to be effective in treatment of chronic hepatitis B with sustained response rate in about one-third of the treated patients. Peg IFN-alpha treatment in non-responders to lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil showed similar response rate to that seen in naïve patients. Thymosin alpha(1) is effective in treatment of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with a significantly increasing virological response over time after therapy.

Characteristics of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) strains with and without breakthrough hepatitis in patients with chronic hepatitis B evaluated by serial HBV full-genome sequences

Lamivudine therapy often causes breakthrough of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and breakthrough hepatitis. The aim of this study was to determine the viral factors that relate to HBV-DNA breakthrough with and without breakthrough hepatitis. Among 82 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who received lamivudine at a dose of 100 mg daily for more than 24 months, 23 patients had HBV-DNA breakthrough induced by a lamivudine-resistant mutant. Of these 23 patients, 16 had breakthrough hepatitis and 7 had only HBV-DNA breakthrough. Serial HBV-DNA full-genome sequences during therapy were examined in 10 (7 had breakthrough hepatitis and 3 did not) of these 23 patients by direct sequencing. Mutations in the S region were examined by cloning in representative patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical backgrounds and virus marker between patients with and without breakthrough hepatitis. The HBV amino acid substitutions at breakthrough hepatitis were identical to those at HBV-DNA breakthrough. Cloning analysis revealed that monoclonal mutational strain appeared at breakthrough and no such mutations existed at baseline. Regarding HBV amino acid substitutions in the polymerase region, S region, X region, and precore-core region with breakthrough compared to baseline, there was no significant differences of the numbers of amino acid substitution between breakthrough hepatitis and non-breakthrough hepatitis. There were no common amino acid changes in patients with breakthrough hepatitis. Although monoclonal lamivudine-resistant strain emerged at HBV-DNA breakthrough in patients with CHB, there were no common amino acid changes, suggesting viral factor may have insignificant role in breakthrough hepatitis.

Clinical outcomes of chronic hepatitis B patients with persistently detectable serum hepatitis B virus DNA during lamivudine therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A small proportion of chronic hepatitis B patients have persistently detectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA despite lamivudine therapy. The incidence and clinical outcomes of patients who persistently have detectable serum HBV-DNA during lamivudine therapy was investigated.

METHOD

We enrolled 221 chronic hepatitis B patients who underwent lamivudine therapy for more than 6 months. Among them, 180 were HBeAg positive. Serum HBV-DNA, HBeAg, anti-HBe and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were serially monitored. The study groups were defined, using a hybridization assay, as patients with reductions in serum HBV-DNA below the detectable level (group I) or patients with persistently detectable serum HBV-DNA (group II) during the initial 6 months of lamivudine therapy.

RESULTS

The incidence of patients who had persistently detectable HBV-DNA was 7.7%. After the first year, the rates of viral breakthrough, HBeAg loss and serum ALT normalization of group I versus group II were 21% versus 63%, 38% versus 0%, and 71% versus 28%, respectively (P < 0.001). The log(10) reduction of serum HBV-DNA at 6 months was -4.58 log(10) for group I and -1.97 log(10) for group II (P < 0.001, bDNA assay). There were no pretreatment lamivudine-resistant mutants in group II.

CONCLUSION

Lamivudine had little effect on serum HBV-DNA suppression, viral breakthrough suppression and rate of HBeAg loss and ALT normalization in chronic hepatitis B patients with persistently detectable serum HBV-DNA during the initial 6 months of therapy. Early termination of lamivudine therapy is advocated for these patients.

Hepatitis B viral load predicts survival of HCC patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy

HCC is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. For patients who are not candidates for curative surgery, systemic chemotherapy is one of the standard treatments. In parts of China and the Far East, over 80% of HCC patients have chronic HBV infection. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between pre-chemotherapy HBV viral load and the survival of HCC patients. HBV infection status was determined prior to chemotherapy in 188 patients, 170 of whom had evidence of HBV chronic infection/exposure (160 hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive, 10 HBsAg-negative/hepatitis B core antibody-positive). Of these, 125 had pretreatment HBV DNA levels determined via real-time PCR. Virological data were analyzed using conventional clinical variables to identify factors that influenced survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that high total bilirubin (P = 0.0016; hazard ratio = 1.040 per 1 muM increase; 95% CI 1.015-1.065), HCV infection (P = 0.0095; hazard ratio = 6.955; 95% CI 1.606-30.129), and high HBV DNA level (P = 0.0217; hazard ratio = 1.650; 95% CI 1.076-2.531) affected survival significantly. Exploratory analysis revealed that high levels of pretreatment HBV DNA had a significantly higher incidence of severe hepatitis during chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

For HCC patients with HBV chronic infection/exposure, a high viral load prior to treatment is an adverse factor for survival and may be associated with a higher incidence of severe hepatitis during chemotherapy. Future strategies to improve the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing chemotherapy should consider supportive therapy that incorporates antiviral therapies to reduce HBV viral load.

Management of hepatitis B: summary of a clinical research workshop

Chronic hepatitis B is caused by persistent infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV), a unique DNA virus that replicates through an RNA intermediate produced from a stable covalently closed circular DNA molecule. Viral persistence appears to be due to inadequate innate and adaptive immune responses. Chronic infection has a variable course after several decades resulting in cirrhosis in up to one-third of patients and liver cancer in a proportion of those with cirrhosis. Sensitive assays for HBV DNA levels in serum have been developed that provide important insights into pathogenesis and natural history. Therapy of hepatitis B is evolving. Peginterferon induces long-term remissions in disease in one-third of patients with typical hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B, but a lesser proportion of those without HBeAg. Several oral nucleoside analogues with activity against HBV have been shown to be effective in suppressing viral levels and improving biochemical and histological features of disease in a high proportion of patients with and without HBeAg, at least in the short term. What is uncertain is which agent or combination of agents is most effective, how long therapy should last, and which criteria should be used to start, continue, switch or stop therapy. Long-term therapy with nucleoside analogues may be the most appropriate approach to treatment, but the expense and lack of data on long-term safety and efficacy make recommendations difficult. Clearly, many basic and clinical research challenges remain in defining optimal means of management of chronic hepatitis B.

Natural course, therapeutic options and economic evaluation of therapies for chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection afflicts 400 million people worldwide and untreated will progress to cirrhosis in 15-40% of individuals, with an associated increased risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The 'inactive carrier state' carries a benign prognosis with a very low risk of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis state is an active disease state with increased risk for progressing to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The HBeAg-negative mutant variety of chronic hepatitis B has been associated with a higher incidence of cirrhosis at initial presentation and more frequent progression to hepatocellular carcinoma compared with the wild-type hepatitis B. Five medications are currently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: interferon-alpha, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir and peginterferon-alpha-2a. Interferon-alpha therapy has been shown to increase the rate of HBeAg and hepatitis B DNA loss with a small chance of hepatitis B surface antigen loss, but has significant adverse effects and is ineffective against the HBeAg-negative mutant. Lamivudine is a safely used, orally administered drug with good efficacy, but is associated with the development of a lamivudine-resistant (Lam-R) mutant in a large proportion of patients after long-term therapy. High relapse rates after lamivudine therapy make this medication less effective in the HBeAg-negative mutant also. Adefovir dipivoxil is a safely used, orally administered drug, which is effective against the Lam-R mutant. Adefovir dipivoxil is effective against the wild-type and HBeAg-negative hepatitis B and has a very low incidence of resistance development. Entecavir is a highly potent and selective new oral drug against hepatitis B. It has demonstrated no resistance development in treatment-naive patients, but a low incidence of resistance in patients infected with prior Lam-R mutants. Peginterferon-alpha-2a is administered once weekly and has improved efficacy compared with standard interferon-alpha and lamivudine. However, it has a similar adverse-effect profile to standard interferon-alpha. Pharmacoeconomic studies have demonstrated a cost benefit in treating chronic hepatitis B patients compared with no therapy. However, results have been conflicting, with earlier studies showing a cost advantage of lamivudine over interferon-alpha and a more recent, comprehensive study favouring interferon-alpha monotherapy in HBeAg-negative patients and adefovir dipivoxil 'salvage' after lamivudine resistance development in HBeAg-positive patients.

Antiviral therapy and resistance with hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis world wide. Recently, however, there has been quite dramatic improvement in the understanding of HBV associated liver disease and its treatment. It has become clear that high viral replication is a major risk factor for the development of both cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Early studies have shown lamivudine lowers the risk of HBV associated complications. There are currently three nucleos(t)ides licensed, in addition to interferon, and there are more drugs coming to the market soon. Interferon or its pegylated counterpart are still the only options for treatment with defined end points, while nucleos(t)ides therapy is used mostly for long term treatment. Combination therapies have not been shown to be superior to monotherapy in naïve patients, however, the outcome depends on how the end point is defined. Interferon plus lamivudine achieves a higher viral suppression than either treatment alone, even though Hbe-seroconversion was not different after a one year treatment. HBV-genotypes emerge as relevant factors, with genotypes "A" and "B" responding relatively well to interferon, achieving up to 20% HBsAg clearance in the case of genotype "A". In addition to having a defined treatment duration, interferon has the advantage of lacking resistance selection, which is a major drawback for lamivudine and the other nucleos(t)ides. The emergence of resistance against adefovir and entecavir is somewhat slower in naïve compared to lamivudine resistant patients. Adefovir has a low resistance profile with 3%, 9%, 18%, and 28% after 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, while entecavir has rarely produced resistance in naïve patients for up to 3 years.

Hepatitis B: the pathway to recovery through treatment

Hepatitis B is a major public health problem in the world today. Since 1985, the number of reported cases has declined as a direct result of universal immunization of neonates, vaccination of at-risk populations, lifestyle or behavioral changes in high-risk groups, refinements in the screening of blood donors, and the use of virally inactivated or genetically engineered products in patients with bleeding disorders. New and potent antiviral agents being developed and evaluated provide hope and optimism for those who are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. Prevention remains the most effective strategy in the global management of hepatitis B virus. Universal immunization programs prevent hepatitis B virus transmission and circumvent acute and chronic infection.

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B remains a clinical challenge. Long-term viral suppression is a major goal of antiviral therapy to improve the clinical outcome of the patients. Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B relies currently on immune modulators such as interferon alpha and its pegylated form, and viral polymerase inhibitors. Because of the slow kinetics of viral clearance and the spontaneous viral genome variability, viral mutants resistant to nucleoside analogs may be selected. However, the development of new antiviral agents is rapidly improving the offing of therapy of chronic hepatitis B. These new therapeutic advances are reviewed in this manuscript.

A review of entecavir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND

Infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) affects two billion people worldwide, and an estimated 400 million people are chronically infected. Currently, FDA-approved regimens for the treatment of chronic HBV include interferon-alpha2b, peginterferon-alpha2a, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, and recently, entecavir.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and the clinical efficacy and safety of entecavir in the treatment of nucleoside-naĩve and nucleoside-resistant HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). SEARCH METHODOLOGY: Computerized searches of PubMed and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1985 to July 10, 2005, were performed with the search headings: entecavir, BMS-200475, and chronic hepatitis B.

FINDINGS

Entecavir, a new deoxyguanosine analog, represents a third agent within the nucleoside/nucleotide HBV polymerase inhibitor class with distinct advantages over lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil: it has a three-step mechanism of action, is the most potent inhibitor of HBV DNA polymerase, is not associated with any major adverse effects, and has a limited potential for resistance. In phase II and III clinical trials, entecavir was found to be superior to lamivudine for all primary endpoints evaluated in both nucleoside-naïve and lamivudine-resistant patients. Entecavir was effective in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative nucleoside-naïve patients. At this time, optimal duration of entecavir therapy is unknown.

CONCLUSION

Entecavir represents a new first- or second-line treatment option for patients chronically infected with HBV. Long-term efficacy and safety studies as well as studies of entecavir in combination with interferon products or other nucleoside/nucleotide analogs are eagerly awaited.

Lamivudine monotherapy in children with immune-tolerant chronic hepatitis B virus

We investigated the efficacy of lamivudine treatment in inducing a primary and sustained response in naive pediatric patients with immune-tolerant chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection. Lamivudine was used (maximum 100 mg/day) for an average of 35 months (16-60 months) for 17 patients, while 6 patients were untreated. All the treated patients became HBV-DNA negative in the twelfth month of therapy with an average of 7 months, however none of them had a sustained virological response. They all became HBV-DNA positive by the twentieth month on average. One patient had significant improvement in liver histology. No side effects were observed. Spontaneous HBV-DNA clearance or HBe seroconversion was obtained in none of the untreated cases. This study suggests that lamivudine cannot induce complete viral control in HBV pediatric immune-tolerant patients.

Kinetics of phytohemaglutinin-induced IFN-γ and TNF-α expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic hepatitis B after liver transplantation

AIM: To study the association between host immunity and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation.

METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from 40 patients with hepatitis B and underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) before and 2, 4, 8 wk after surgery. After being cultured in vitro for 72 h, the levels of INF-γ and TNF-α in culture supernatants were detected with ELISA. At the same time, the quantities of HBV DNA in serum and PBMCs were measured by real time PCR.

RESULTS: The levels of INF-γ and TNF-α in PBMC culture supernatants decreased before and 2, 4 wk after surgery in turns (INF-γ 155.52±72.32 ng/L vs 14.76±9.88 ng/L vs 13.22±10.35 ng/L, F = 6.946, P = 0.027<0.05; TNF-α 80.839±46.75 ng/L vs 18.59±17.29 ng/L vs 9.758±7.96 ng/L, F = 22.61, P = 0.0001<0.05). The levels of INF-γ and TNF-α were higher in groups with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) than in those without PHA before surgery. However, the difference disappeared following OLT. Furthermore, INF-γ and TNF-α could not be detected in most patients at wk 4 and none at wk 8 after OLT. The HBV detection rate and virus load in PBMC before and 2, 4 wk after surgery were fluctuated (HBV detected rate: 51.4%, 13.3%, 50% respectively; HBV DNA: 3.55±0.674 log(10) copies/mL vs 3.00±0.329 log(10) copies/mL vs 4.608±1.344 log(10) copies/mL, F = 7.582, P = 0.002<0.05). HBV DNA in serum was 4.48±1.463 log(10) copies/mL before surgery and <103 copies/mL after OLT except for one with 5.72±106 copies/mL 4 wk after OLT who was diagnosed as HBV recurrence. The levels of INF-γ and TNF-α were lower in patients with a high HBV load than in those with a low HBV load (HBV DNA detected/undetected in PBMCs: IFN-γ 138.08±72.44 ng/L vs 164.24±72.07 ng/L, t = 1.065, P = 0.297>0.05, TNF-α 80.75±47.30 ng/L vs 74.10±49.70 ng/L, t = 0.407, P = 0.686>0.05; HBV DNA positive/negative: IFN-γ 136.77±70.04 ng/L vs 175.27±71.50 ng/L, t = 1.702, P = 0.097>0.05; TNF-α 75.37±43.02 ng/L vs 81.53±52.46 ng/L, t = 0.402, P = 0.690>0.05).

CONCLUSION: The yielding of INF-γ and TNF-α from PBMCs is inhibited significantly by immunosuppressive agents following OLT with HBV load increased, indicating that the impaired immunity of host is associated with HBV recurrence after OLT.

Vaccination with recombinant HBsAg-HBIG complex in healthy adults

A therapeutic vaccine for viral hepatitis B composed of yeast-derived recombinant HBsAg complexed to human anti-HBs immunoglobulin (yeast-derived-immunogenic complex, YIC) with alum as the adjuvant was evaluated for safety. In stage 1, 22 healthy Chinese adult volunteers were vaccinated with three doses of 30 microg, 60 microg or 90 microg of HBsAg in YIC at 4-week intervals. In stage 2, nine volunteers received 90 microg of HBsAg in YIC for six injections. All immunizations were well tolerated. Renal, liver function and other blood chemistry tests remained within normal range. All recipients developed serum anti-HBs, the highest being 1000 mIU/ml, and the subtypes of anti-HBs were IgG1 and IgG3. The serum levels of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) were increased, while no significant increase was observed in interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10) or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). These results indicate that this complex is safe and can induce a potent anti-HBs response.

Peginterferon Alfa-2a, lamivudine, and the combination for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Current treatments for chronic hepatitis B are suboptimal. In the search for improved therapies, we compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa plus lamivudine, pegylated interferon alfa without lamivudine, and lamivudine alone for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 814 patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B received either peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg once weekly) plus oral placebo, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (100 mg daily), or lamivudine alone. The majority of patients in the study were Asian (87 percent). Most patients were infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B or C. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks of follow-up, significantly more patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine than those who received lamivudine monotherapy had HBeAg seroconversion (32 percent vs. 19 percent [P<0.001] and 27 percent vs. 19 percent [P=0.02], respectively) or HBV DNA levels below 100,000 copies per milliliter (32 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.01] and 34 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.003], respectively). Sixteen patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a (alone or in combination) had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion, as compared with 0 in the group receiving lamivudine alone (P=0.001). The most common adverse events were those known to occur with therapies based on interferon alfa. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 percent, 6 percent, and 2 percent of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, combination therapy, and lamivudine monotherapy, respectively. Two patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy had irreversible liver failure after the cessation of treatment--one underwent liver transplantation, and the other died.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, peginterferon alfa-2a offers superior efficacy over lamivudine, on the basis of HBeAg seroconversion, HBV DNA suppression, and HBsAg seroconversion.

Immunomodulatory therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most prevalent viral pathogens of man with around 350 million chronically infected patients. It has been postulated that in persistently infected individuals the HBV-specific immune response is too weak to eliminate HBV from all infected hepatocytes, but sufficiently strong to continuously destroy HBV-infected hepatocytes and to induce chronic inflammatory liver disease. The primary aim in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B is to induce sustained disease remission and prevent serious complications like liver failure and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. The recent emergence of drug-resistant HBV mutants and post-treatment relapse as a consequence of nucleoside analogue monotherapy emphasizes that the principal goal should be to stimulate a successful immune response. In this paper we will focus on the immune response to HBV and we will review reported data on immunotherapeutic strategies like immunomodulatory drugs (cytokines and Thymic derivates) and vaccine therapies using currently available recombinant anti-HBV vaccines, lipopeptide-based T cell vaccine and newly developed genetic vaccines.

Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma

The accuracy and the reliability of well-recognized clinical, virologic, histologic, and molecular risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma are still insufficient; thus, accurate risk prediction of developing cancer in individual patients remains an elusive goal.

Effects of fibril- or fixed-collagen on matrix metalloproteinase-1 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 production in the human hepatocyte cell line HLE

AIM: Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) are central to the spontaneous resolution of liver fibrosis. The mechanisms involved have been investigated in hepatic stellate cells (HSC), but not in hepatocytes. We investigated the effects of fibril- and fixed-collagen on MMP-1 and TIMP-1 production in hepatocytes, using the HLE cell line.

METHODS: Fibril type I and IV collagen were prepared by HCl digestion of type I and IV collagen, respectively. For fixed-collagen, culture dishes were coated with fibril type I or IV collagen and fixed by ultraviolet. Type I collagenase activity was measured using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled type I collagen. MMP-1 and TIMP-1 in HLE cells were measured by a one-step sandwich enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS: Both fibril type I and IV collagen significantly increased type I collagenase activity about two-fold compared with no fibril collagen. The effects of the fibril collagen were not affected by the coating condition. There was no significant difference in the effects on collagenase activity between cells cultured in medium containing fibril type I collagen and those cultured in the presence of type IV collagen. Both types of fibril collagen significantly increased MMP-1 production, and showed more than 10-fold higher levels of MMP-1 than the control. The enhanced MMP-1 production by fibril collagens was unaffected by the coating condition. By contrast, TIMP-1 production was not changed by the addition of fibril type I or IV collagen, and neither was it affected by the coating conditions. Coating with type I collagen significantly suppressed MMP-1 production by almost one-tenth compared with no coating. By contrast, TIMP-1 production was not affected by either the absence of a collagen coat or by increasing the concentration of the coating collagen.

CONCLUSION: These results indicated that, in HLE cells, fibril- and fixed-collagen have opposite effects on MMP-1 production without affecting TIMP production. Fibril collagen induced collagenase activity by up-regulation of MMP-1 production without affecting TIMP-1 production. By contrast, fixed collagen reduced MMP-1 production. Our results suggest that hepatocytes might also play an important role in the regulation of the hepatic fibrosis alongside HSC.

In vivo immunization by vaccine therapy following virus suppression by lamivudine: a novel approach for treating patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Both the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the immune response of the hosts to HBV play important roles in the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Lamivudine is a potent antiviral agent with minimal immune modulator capacity. Moreover, lamivudine causes severe side effects like breakthrough of HBV DNA and breakthrough hepatitis in patients with CHB. On the other hand, vaccine therapy, a recently-developed immune therapy, exhibits potent immune modulatory potentials and almost no side effects, but possesses little antiviral capacity in patients with CHB.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a combination therapy of lamivudine and vaccine in patients with CHB.

STUDY DESIGN

Seventy-two patients with CHB (hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, 40; antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe)-positive, 32). All patients received lamivudine at a dose of 100 mg daily for 12 months. Fifteen patients (HBeAg+, 9; anti-HBe+, 6) receiving oral lamivudine were also given a vaccine containing 20 microg of hepatitis B surface antigen, intradermally, once every 2 weeks for 12 times (combination therapy).

RESULTS

Twelve months after the start of therapy, serum HBV DNA became negative in 9 of 9 (100%) HBeAg+ CHB patients receiving combination therapy and in 15 of 31 (48%) HBeAg+ CHB patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy (P < 0.05). The rate of seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-HBe was also significantly higher in patients receiving combination therapy (56% versus lamivudine monotherapy, 16%, P < 0.05). Of the 57 patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy, breakthrough of HBV DNA was found in 10 and breakthrough hepatitis was found in 4; however, these were not seen in any patient receiving combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy represents a better therapeutic regimen with few complications in patients with CHB.

A randomized, controlled, clinical study of thymosin alpha-1 versus interferon-alpha in [corrected] patients with chronic hepatitis B lacking HBeAg in China [corrected]

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of thymosin-alphal (T-alpha1) with that of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with chronic hepatitis B who were positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and hepatitis B envelope antibody (anti-HBe).

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were randomly divided into groups A and B. Both groups were comparable (p > 0.05) at baseline regarding age, sex, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Group A patients received T-alpha1 1.6 mg subcutaneously twice weekly, while group B patients received IFN-alpha 5 million IU daily for 15 days, then thrice weekly for 6 months. Results from the 2 groups were compared with data from a group of 30 patients never treated with IFN-alpha and who were followed-up for 12 months (historical control [HC] group); the 3 groups were comparable (p > 0.05).

RESULTS

After treatment, a complete response (ALT normalization and HBV DNA loss) occurred in 8 of 26 patients in group A (30.8%) and 14 of 30 in group B (46.7%; chi2 = 1.476, p = 0.224). After a follow-up period of 6 months, a complete response was observed in 11 of 26 patients in group A (42.3%) and 7 of 30 in group B (23.3%; chi2 = 2.299, p = 0.129). The rate of complete response was significantly greater in the IFN-alpha than HC group at the end of therapy (46.7% vs 3.3%; chi2 = 15.022, p = 0.0001), and in the T-alphal than HC group at the end of follow-up (42.3% vs 3.3%; chi2 = 12.566, p = 0.0001). Ten of the 12 T-alphal responders (i.e. partial responders; 83.3%) experienced sustained, non-detectable HBV DNA after 6 months' treatment; 6 of the 14 T-alphal non-responders (42.9%) showed a delayed response of non-detectable HBV DNA during the follow-up period. Corresponding values for group B patients were 50% (9/18) and 0% (0/12). The rate of delayed response was significantly higher in group A than the other 2 groups (chi2 = 6.686, p = 0.010; chi2 = 4.964, p = 0.038), whereas the rate of flare was higher in group B than in the other 2 groups (chi2 = 3.445, p = 0.063; chi2 = 7.668, p = 0.006), during the follow-up period. Unlike IFN-alpha, T-alphal was well tolerated, i.e. no adverse effects were noted in group A.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a 6-month course of T-alpha1 therapy is effective and safe in patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B; T-alpha1 can reduce HBV replication in such patients. Compared with IFN-alpha, T-alpha1 is better tolerated and seems to induce a gradual and more sustained normalization of ALT and loss of HBV DNA. Combination therapy with T-alpha1 and IFN-alpha or nucleoside analogs for hepatitis B warrants further study.

Chronic hepatitis B infection: long term comparison of children receiving interferon alpha and untreated controls

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the virological outcome of chronic hepatitis B (CH-B) in children who received interferon alpha (IFN) compared with no treatment.

METHODS

Seventy-four children with CH-B (median age, 6.1 years; 44 boys) selected from a cohort of 158 cases were included and divided into two groups: IFN-treated (n = 37) and control (n = 37). The controls were matched with the treated children by baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, sex and age. The Kaplan-Meier method was performed to estimate the time to clearance of hepatitis B e antigen (HbeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg).

RESULTS

Mean duration of follow-up was comparable in two groups (5.2 +/- 3.8 years in treatment group versus 5.2 +/- 3.7 years in control group, NS). HBeAg and HBsAg loss occurred in 20 (54.1%) and three treated children versus 13 (35.1%) and one untreated children (NS), respectively. The 7-year cumulative HBeAg and HBsAg clearance rates were 47.5% and 8.9% after the first visit in the treatment group versus 33.5% and 4.0% in untreated children (NS), respectively. Elevated baseline ALT (two times upper limit of normal) had a significant effect on the long-term cumulative rate of HBeAg seroconversion in treated patients (P = 0.01) but not in the untreated group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that the overall long-term virological outcome does not differ significantly between IFN-treated and untreated children but that a significant benefit of treatment on the long term rate of HBeAg seroconversion is obtained in children with higher baseline ALT levels.

Four years of lamivudine treatment in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of up to 4 years of lamivudine treatment and the clinical relevance of the emergence of YMDD-variant hepatitis B virus (HBV).

METHODS

Fifty-eight Chinese adult patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were randomized to lamivudine 100 mg/day for up to 5 years and were monitored for YMDD-variant HBV, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion (loss of HBeAg and detectable antibody to HBeAg) and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations. Four-year data are reported here.

RESULTS

The rate of HBeAg seroconversion increased with extended therapy and also with higher baseline ALT concentrations. YMDD-variant HBV was detected in 67% (39/58) of patients at some point during treatment. After 4 years, a total of 47% (27/58) of patients achieved HBeAg seroconversion. Thirty-three per cent (13/39) of patients with YMDD-variant HBV achieved HBeAg seroconversion; this increased to 57% (8/14) in patients with moderately elevated (>2-5 x upper limit of normal) pre-treatment ALT concentrations. The proportion of patients that achieved normal serum ALT increased from 29% (17/58) at baseline to 69% (31/45) following 4 years of treatment. That included 68% (23/34) of patients with YMDD-variant HBV and 73% (8/11) of those without the variant. All patients receiving lamivudine had reduced serum concentrations of HBV-DNA compared with baseline, despite the emergence of YMDD-variant HBV in 39 patients. Lamivudine was generally well tolerated; there was little change in the number or type of drug-related adverse events in the fourth year of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the emergence of YMDD-variant HBV, Chinese patients showed increased HBeAg seroconversion and improvement in ALT levels with an increased duration of treatment with lamivudine.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients who are hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers and undergoing chemotherapy (CT) may be complicated by HBV reactivation. Over 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are HBV carriers; however, the incidence of HBV reactivation during CT has not been well-reported. A prospective study was conducted to determine the incidence of HBV reactivation, the associated morbidity and mortality, and possible risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

102 HBsAg-positive patients with inoperable HCC underwent systemic CT. Patients received either combination cisplatin, interferon, doxorubicin and fluorouracil (PIAF) or single-agent doxorubicin. They were followed up during and for 8 weeks after CT.

RESULTS

In 102 patients, 59 (58%) developed hepatitis amongst whom 37 (36%) were attributable to HBV reactivation. Twelve (30%) died of HBV reactivation. CT was interrupted in 32 patients (86%) with reactivation and 54 (83%) without reactivation (P>0.05). The median survivals were 6.00 and 5.62 months, respectively (P=0.694). Elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was found to be a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

HBV reactivation is a common cause of liver damage during CT in HBsAg-positive HCC patients. The only identifiable associated risk factor was elevated pre-treatment ALT. Further studies into the role of antiviral and novel anticancer therapies are required to improve the prognosis of these patients.