A critique of therapeutic trials in Helicobacter pylori-positive functional dyspepsia

Therapeutic massage/Tuina for treatment of functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the potential effect of therapeutic massage/Tuina on functional dyspepsia (FD) patients.

METHOD

Twelve databases and three clinical trial registries were searched until December 2021, for RCTs that compared Tuina combined with or without conventional therapy versus conventional therapy in FD. We assessed the methodological quality of included trials by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and graded the quality of the evidence. The data were presented as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) respectively with their 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

In total, 14 RCTs with 1128 FD participants were included. Compared with conventional therapy, Tuina showed significant beneficial effects on improving overall symptom (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.19, low certainty evidence), and early satiation (MD -0.44 scores, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.16, very low certainty evidence). Compared with conventional therapy, Tuina plus conventional therapy also significantly improved overall symptom (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23, low certainty evidence), quality of life (MD 10.44 scores, 95% CI 7.65-13.23, low certainty evidence), and epigastric pain (MD -0.76 scores, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.41, low certainty evidence). No adverse events related to Tuina and cost-effectiveness were reported.

CONCLUSION

Low certainty evidence showed that Tuina significantly improved overall symptom of FD participants compared with conventional therapy. Low certainty evidence showed that Tuina plus conventional therapy obviously improved overall symptom and quality of life of FD participants compared with conventional therapy.

Role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is implicated in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia (FD). There is conflicting data regarding the benefit of H. pylori eradication for symptom relief in FD.

AIMS

To study the benefit of eradicating H. pylori in patients with FD as compared to standard medical treatment (SMT). Secondary aims were to find efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy, recurrence of H. pylori after eradication, and predictors of efficacy.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients of FD (ROME IV) with H. pylori infection presenting in the outpatient department of our hospital were enrolled. Patients with Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale > 2 and H. pylori infection were included. Patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 received H. pylori eradication therapy and group 2 received SMT. Treatment success was defined as symptom relief (GOS score < 2 and reduction by at least 2 points at 6 months) and H. pylori eradication was defined as stool antigen negative at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 329 participants with FD, 253 were H. pylori positive (rapid urease test and stool antigen test) (76.89%). After exclusions, 202 were randomized into two groups of 101 each. Thirty-two patients in group 1 and 31 in group 2 had treatment success (31.7% vs. 30.7%, p=1.000). The efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy was 74.46% (70/94). H. pylori reinfection rate was 26.02% (19/73).

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication therapy does not provide additional benefit in symptom relief in patients with FD as compared with SMT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04697641 (retrospectively registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov in January 2021).

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication in Iranian patients with functional dyspepsia: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Whether patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) should receive Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy remains controversial. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on dyspeptic symptoms of patients with FD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of H. pylori eradication for FD was conducted. A total of 720 FD patients diagnosed by Rome III criteria were consecutively enrolled. We randomly assigned 186 H. pylori infected patients with FD to receive quadruple therapy for 14 days and 173 such patients to receive identical-appearing placebos. Severity of abdominal symptoms was assessed with the Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score (GDSS), and eradication of H. pylori by (13)C-urea breath test was evaluated during one year.

RESULTS

The rate of eradication of H. pylori infection was 87.1% in the treatment group and 2.9% in the placebo group at 6 weeks (p = 0.001). The mean GDSS at 12 months was 4.9 ±2.8 in the treatment group, as compared to 5.2 ±3.4 in the placebo group (p = 0.064). The scores in both groups were lower than those at baseline. According to the intention-to-treat analysis, at 12 months, there was no significant difference between groups in the rate of successful treatment (48.6% in the treatment group and 51.2% in the placebo group; p = 0.84). There was no significant difference in mean symptom scores between the two treatment groups at any point during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study provide no evidence that H. pylori eradication leads to relief of symptoms 12 months after treatment, and there is a need for further studies.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study to Investigate the Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and the Sensitivity of its Diagnostic Methods in Iran

CONTEXT

Helicobacter pylori is the most common infecting organism affecting humans, being almost half the population infected. The aim of this study was to find out the epidemiological features and the sensitivity of diagnostic methods of Helicobacter pylori infection in Iran, which can provide the logic of developing preventive approaches to control Helicobacter pylori infections and the associated diseases.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

By reviewing the databases of SID, MAGIRAN, SCOPUS, MEDLIB, Google, ISI and PUBMED, a total of 30 papers, published from 1994 to 2011, were extracted. Summary prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA Ver.11.

RESULTS

Among the 30 studies evaluated, the prevalence rate of Helicobacter pylori infections in Iran was estimated as 50.7 % (95% CI: 44.4-56.9%). When the sensitivity of diagnostic methods was evaluated, ELISA, with an accuracy rate of 52.3% (95% CI: 43.8 to 60.8%) was found the most accurate diagnostic method available. The highest and the least Helicobacter pylori prevalence were 19.2% in Tehran and 74.27% in Mazandran respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

About half the population in Iran is infected with Helicobacter pylori, the pollution in different areas and preventive strategies should be carried out to control this infection. The prevalence rate of Helicobacter pylori infections in Iran showed only little changes during the years 1994 to 2011.

Socio-demographic characteristics of patients with diagnosed functional dyspepsia

INTRODUCTION

The term "dyspepsia" comes from the Greek words "dys' and 'peptin", which maen "ill digestion" or indigestion, although this set of symptoms in the adult clinic has little to do with the digestion or absorption process, and refers more to ailments related to the upper section of the gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

Assessment of the frequency of functional dyspepsia diagnosis, the characteristics of the group and an attempt to identify the accompanying symptoms, assessment of histological lesions and an attempt to answer question about the efficiency of anti-secretory and eradication therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved patients reporting for gastrofiberscopic examination due to dyspeptic ailments. A total of 230 patients were examined, including 140 women and 90 men, above 18 years of age. They underwent endoscopic examination, and a selected group with functional dyspepsia (FD), analysed using the 'Gast' questionnaire, underwent eradication therapy or proton pump inhibitors. Statistical analysis involved χ(2) and Fischer's test.

RESULTS

The study involved 230 individuals with dyspeptic disorders. The largest age group was 46-60 years. These patients reported due to their ailments mostly in autumn and winter. The differentiated group with FD included 53 patients (23% of the clinical population). 69.8% of the FD group was infected with Helicobacter pylori (with 81.2% of the whole population, respectively). Individuals with FD reported improvement more often after being administered drugs to decrease gastric secretion, more often declared post-elementary education and suffered from non-gastric ailments yet still described their state of health as good. No positive therapeutic effect of eradication was noticed during the 6-month observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the very high ratio of subjects with functional dyspepsia, also observed in the study sample, and the influence of civilization progress, we should expect increasing frequency of occurrence of this problem.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the effect of its eradication on symptoms of functional dyspepsia in Kashmir, India

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection has regional variation. Effect of eradication of H. pylori on symptoms of functional dyspepsia is uncertain, and the data in Asian scenario are scanty. The study aimed to see H. pylori positivity rate in patients of functional dyspepsia and the effect of its eradication on symptoms.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was the study design used. Patients of functional dyspepsia defined as per Rome 2 criteria were tested for H. pylori infection by rapid urease test and gastric biopsy. H. pylori-positive patients were randomly allocated to triple therapy (20 mg of omeprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of amoxicillin orally two times daily) and omeperazole plus identical placebo for 2 weeks. Symptoms were assessed with the weekly Likert scale.

RESULTS

H. pylori positivity rate in functional dyspepsia was 1160/2000 (58%). At 6 weeks, the eradication rate for H. pylori in triple therapy and placebo group was (181/259 [69.8%] and 13/260 [5.0%], P = 0.001), respectively. On intention-to-treat analysis, the symptom resolution at 1 month was (157/259 [60.7%] and 136/260 [52.3%], P = 0.38), respectively. At 12 months, H. pylori eradication and healing of gastritis in triple therapy and placebo group were (116/174 [66.7%] and 12/180 [6.7%], P = 0.001) and (132/174 [75.9%] and 11/180 [6.1%], P = 0.001), respectively. On intension to treat, the resolution of symptoms in triple therapy and placebo group was (95/217 [43.7%] and 72/195 [36.9%], P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

There is high H. pylori positivity rate in patients of functional dyspepsia. The eradication of H. pylori does not resolve the symptoms despite healing of gastritis.

Helicobacter Pylori "Test-and-Treat" Strategy for Management of Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review

OBJECTIVES:

Deciding on whether the Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy is an appropriate diagnostic–therapeutic approach for patients with dyspepsia invites a series of questions. The aim present article addresses the test-and-treat strategy and attempts to provide practical conclusions for the clinician who diagnoses and treats patients with dyspepsia.

METHODS:

Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE using the keywords Helicobacter pylori, test-and-treat, and dyspepsia. We focused mainly on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and decision analyses.

RESULTS:

Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy, although we must be cautious when extrapolating the results from one geographical area to another. Many factors determine whether this strategy is appropriate in each particular area. The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease, prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease, and yield symptomatic benefit in a minority of patients with functional dyspepsia. Future studies should be able to stratify dyspeptic patients according to their likelihood of improving after treatment of infection by H. pylori.

CONCLUSIONS:

The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease and prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease. In addition, a minority of infected patients with functional dyspepsia will gain symptomatic benefit. Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy. The test-and-treat strategy is being reinforced by the accumulating data that support the increasingly accepted idea that “the only good H. pylori is a dead H. pylori”.

Review article: endpoints used in functional dyspepsia drug therapy trials

BACKGROUND

The measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in treatment trials for functional gastrointestinal disorders is a matter of controversy.

AIM

To focus on instruments and endpoints that have been used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic agents in functional dyspepsia (FD) trials, also considering the newly defined Rome III FD criteria.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted to identify relevant studies pertaining to FD treatment, with particular emphasis on the studies to date which have used validated outcome measures.

RESULTS

Currently available outcome measures are heterogeneous across studies. They include global binary endpoints, analogue or categorical scoring scales, uni- or multi-dimensional disease specific questionnaires, global outcome evaluations and quality of life questionnaires. Across the available outcome measures, substantial heterogeneity is found, not only in the type of endpoint measure, but also in the number and types of symptoms that are considered to be part of the FD symptom complex. Especially based on content validity, none of the existing questionnaires or endpoints can be considered sufficiently validated to be recommended unequivocally as the primary outcome measure for FD trials according to the Rome III criteria. On the other hand, existing well-validated multi-dimensional questionnaires that include many non-FD symptoms can be narrowed down to evaluate only the cardinal symptoms according to Rome III.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an urgent need to develop Rome III-based patient-reported outcomes for functional dyspepsia. Well-validated multi-dimensional questionnaires may serve as a guidance for this purpose, and could also be considered for use in ongoing clinical trials.

WITHDRAWN: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is the main cause of peptic ulcer disease. The role of H pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of H pylori eradication on dyspepsia symptoms in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and keywords, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and with pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All parallel group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs to eradicate H pylori with placebo or other drugs known not to eradicate H pylori for patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected on individual and global dyspeptic symptom scores, quality of life measures and adverse effects. Dyspepsia outcomes were dichotomised into minimal/resolved versus same/worse symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty one randomised controlled trials were included in the systematic review. Eighteen trials compared antisecretory dual or triple therapy with placebo antibiotics +/- antisecretory therapy, and evaluated dyspepsia at 3-12 months. Seventeen of these trials gave results as dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3566 patients and there was no significant heterogeneity between the studies. There was a 10% relative risk reduction in the H pylori eradication group (95% CI = 6% to 14%) compared to placebo. The number needed to treat to cure one case of dyspepsia = 14 (95% CI = 10 to 25). A further three trials compared Bismuth based H pylori eradication with an alternative pharmacological agent. These trials were smaller and had a shorter follow-up but suggested H pylori eradication was more effective than either H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate in treating non-ulcer dyspepsia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

H pylori eradication therapy has a small but statistically significant effect in H pylori positive non-ulcer dyspepsia. An economic model suggests this modest benefit may still be cost-effective but more research is needed.

A validation study of the Italian Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire

Assessment of symptoms should be one of the main outcome measures in dyspepsia clinical trials. This requires a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire that measures the frequency and severity of dyspeptic symptoms. The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF-LDQ) has been proven to fulfil these criteria in its original version in the English language. The aim of the study was to assess the internal consistency, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the SF-LDQ in primary and secondary care. Unselected primary and secondary care patients completed the Italian version of the SF-LDQ. Test-retest reliability was assessed after 2 days. Validity was measured by comparison with diagnosis made by physicians. Responsiveness was determined before and after treatment for endoscopically proven disease. The SF-LDQ was administered to 311 patients in primary care and 179 in secondary care patients. Internal consistency, as judged by the Cronbach's α, was 0.90. Pearson's correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.92. The SF-LDQ had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 82%. A highly significant response to change was also observed (p = 0.001). The Italian SF-LDQ is a reliable, valid and responsive self-completed outcome measure for quantifying the frequency and severity of dyspeptic symptoms.

Unanswered questions about Helicobacter pylori

There is general agreement that Helicobacter pylori eradication is indicated in all infected patients with duodenal ulcer disease and is probably indicated in all infected patients with gastric ulcer disease. However, translation of treatment recommendations into practice leads to some difficult clinical decisions. Three of the more perplexing questions are whether or not all patients with dyspepsia and H. pylori should be treated, whether or not a definitive diagnosis of ulcer should be established by an invasive method, and whether H. pylori eradication is sufficient to prevent recurrence of bleeding ulcers, especially in patient groups that have a high frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Another common problem is the question of whether or not to establish the success of an eradication regimen in an individual patient and the choice of method to obtain this information. There is also an obvious need to develop better antimicrobial regimens aimed specifically at Helicobacter pylori. At the basic level, almost nothing is known about the mechanisms by which H. pylori produces peptic ulcer in 10-20% of infected patients while producing gastritis in all infected subjects. There is good evidence that host factors, including intrinsic rate of acid secretion, family history and smoking are independent additive risk factors for ulcer. Ingestion of NSAIDs appears to be an independent and separate risk factor. There is evidence that strains of H. pylori that lack certain genetic markers may have a reduced likelihood of causing ulcers, but the 'ulcer' marker is present in the majority of infected subjects without ulcer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Systematic review and meta-analysis from Chinese literature: the association between Helicobacter pylori eradication and improvement of functional dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of eradicating Helicobacter pylori on dyspeptic symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia in China.

DATA SOURCES

Randomized controlled trials conducted in China and those published between 1989 and April 2007.

REVIEW METHODS

The articles were retrieved from Chinese biomedicine Web database and Chinese scientific Journals database using proper MESH headings and assessed by two independent investigators according to established inclusion criteria. The characteristics of chosen articles were displayed for further analysis, and summary odds ratio were calculated to determine the overall effect of H. pylori eradication. All the data were entered and analyzed using REVIEW MANAGER 4.1, and p < .05 was defined as statistically significant in all analysis.

RESULTS

Seven qualified trials were enrolled, and the summary odds ratio for improvement in dyspeptic symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia in whom H. pylori was eradicated was 3.61 (95%CI: 2.62, 4.98, p < .00001). The difference in the follow-up period did not influence the final outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in dyspeptic symptoms occurred among Chinese patients with functional dyspepsia in whom H. pylori was eradicated.

The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire validation study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of symptoms should be the primary outcome measure in dyspepsia clinical trials. This requires a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire that measures the frequency and severity of dyspepsia. The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire fulfils these characteristics, but is long and was not designed for self-completion, so a shorter questionnaire was developed (the Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire).

AIM

To assess the acceptability, interpretability, internal consistency, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire in primary and secondary care.

METHODS

Unselected primary and secondary care patients completed the Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was assessed after 2 days. Validity was measured by comparison with general practitioners' diagnosis. Sensitivity analysis and logistic regression were employed to determine the most valid scoring system. Responsiveness was determined before and after treatment for endoscopically proven disease.

RESULTS

The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire was administered to 388 primary care and 204 secondary care patients. The Pearson coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.93. The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 75%. A highly significant response to change was observed (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire is a reliable, valid and responsive self-completed outcome measure for quantifying the frequency and severity of dyspepsia symptoms, which is shorter and more convenient than the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire.

Effect of a gastro-protective agent, rebamipide, on symptom improvement in patients with functional dyspepsia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although mucosal protective agents have been used frequently for treatment of symptomatic gastritis, there has been no well-controlled study of functional dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a 4-week treatment with rebamipide for the relief of overall dyspeptic symptoms and the improvement in quality of life from an untreated baseline in Japanese patients with functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

In a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study, 81 patients with functional dyspepsia were recruited and treated with rebamipide (100 mg, t.i.d.) or placebo for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study period by a symptom questionnaire. Quality of life was evaluated by the QPD 32.

RESULTS

Data was analyzed for symptoms from 38 patients who received rebamipide and 33 patients who received placebo treatment. Overall symptoms were significantly improved in both the rebamipide and placebo treatment groups from the untreated baseline after 4 weeks of treatment, and the mean changes in overall symptoms were not significantly different between the groups. However, the improvement in symptom score was significantly greater in the treatment arm than in the placebo arm for three items, which were bloating, belching, and pain or discomfort that was relieved after a meal. Regarding quality of life, social restriction and pain intensity were significantly improved in the rebamipide treatment group in per-protocol analysis (P = 0.048 and P = 0.031, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although rebamipide was not significantly better than placebo in reducing overall symptoms by 4 weeks' treatment, it may partially improve the symptoms. It may also be beneficial in improvement of quality of life in Japanese patients with functional dyspepsia.

Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on gastric emptying measured using the 13C-octanoic acid breath test and the acetaminophen method

BACKGROUND

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori eradication and gastric emptying has been reported; however, the effect of eradication therapy on gastric emptying is still unclear. This study evaluated the relationship between three gastric emptying techniques, the scintigraphic technique, the 13C-octanoic acid breath test, and the acetaminophen method, measured simultaneously, and the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on gastric emptying and abdominal symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia who were H. pylori positive.

METHODS

Fifty-three consecutive patients with positive H. pylori infection were enrolled in this study. In the first 14 patients, gastric emptying was measured using the three gastric emptying techniques. In 42 patients cured of H. pylori infection, the 13C-octanoic acid breath test and the acetaminophen method were performed before and 3 months after eradication.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between the scintigraphic technique, the 13C-octanoic acid breath test, and the acetaminophen method. Gastric emptying determined by the 13C-octanoic acid breath test and the acetaminophen method was not changed after eradication, on average. In 14 (33.3%) patients a decrease in symptom score after eradication was observed. In four (9.5%) patients, accelerated gastric emptying after eradication may have led to a reduction in the abdominal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The 13C-octanoic acid breath test and the acetaminophen method are appropriate for investigating gastric emptying. A causal relationship between improvement of symptoms and accelerated gastric emptying was not found, and the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy in patients with functional dyspepsia was minimally exhibited.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is the main cause of peptic ulcer disease. The role of H pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of H pylori eradication on dyspepsia symptoms in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and keywords, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and with pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All parallel group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs to eradicate H pylori with placebo or other drugs known not to eradicate H pylori for patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected on individual and global dyspeptic symptom scores, quality of life measures and adverse effects. Dyspepsia outcomes were dichotomised into minimal/resolved versus same/worse symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty one randomised controlled trials were included in the systematic review. Eighteen trials compared antisecretory dual or triple therapy with placebo antibiotics +/- antisecretory therapy, and evaluated dyspepsia at 3-12 months. Seventeen of these trials gave results as dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3566 patients and there was no significant heterogeneity between the studies. There was a 10% relative risk reduction in the H pylori eradication group (95% CI = 6% to 14%) compared to placebo. The number needed to treat to cure one case of dyspepsia = 14 (95% CI = 10 to 25). A further three trials compared Bismuth based H pylori eradication with an alternative pharmacological agent. These trials were smaller and had a shorter follow-up but suggested H pylori eradication was more effective than either H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate in treating non-ulcer dyspepsia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

H pylori eradication therapy has a small but statistically significant effect in H pylori positive non-ulcer dyspepsia. An economic model suggests this modest benefit may still be cost-effective but more research is needed.

Validation of a 7-point Global Overall Symptom scale to measure the severity of dyspepsia symptoms in clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Currently there is no consensus on the optimal method to measure the severity of dyspepsia symptoms in clinical trials.

AIM

To validate the 7-point Global Overall Symptom scale.

METHODS

The Global Overall Symptom scale uses a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = no problem to 7 = a very severe problem. Validation was performed in two randomized-controlled trials (n = 1121 and 512). Construct validity: Global Overall Symptom was compared with the Quality of Life in Reflux And Dyspepsia, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Reflux Disease Questionnaire and 10 specific symptoms using Spearman correlation coefficients. Test-retest reliability: The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was calculated for patients with stable dyspepsia defined by no change in Overall Treatment Effect score over two visits. Responsiveness: effect size and standardized response mean were also calculated.

RESULTS

Construct validity: Change in Global Overall Symptom score correlated significantly with Quality of Life for Reflux And Dyspepsia, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Reflux Disease Questionnaire and specific symptoms (all P < 0.0002). Reliability: The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.62 (n = 205) and 0.42 (n = 270). Responsiveness: There was a positive correlation between change in Global Overall Symptom and change in symptom severity. The effect size and standardized response mean were 1.1 and 2.1, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Global Overall Symptom scale is a simple, valid outcome measure for dyspepsia treatment trials.

Management of functional dyspepsia: Unsolved problems and new perspectives

The common characteristic criteria of all functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are the persistence and recurrence of variable gastrointestinal symptoms that cannot be explained by any structural or biochemical abnormalities. Functional dyspepsia (FD) represents one of the important GI disorders in Western countries because of its remarkably high prevalence in general population and its impact on quality of life. Due to its dependence on both subjective determinants and diverse country-specific circumstances, the definition and management strategies of FD are still variably stated. Clinical trials with several drug classes (e.g., proton pump inhibitors, H2-blockers, prokinetic drugs) have been performed frequently without validated disease-specific test instruments for the outcome measurements. Therefore, the interpretation of such trials remains difficult and controversial with respect to comparability and evaluation of drug efficacy, and definite conclusions can be drawn neither for diagnostic management nor for efficacious drug therapy so far. In view of these unsolved problems, guidelines both on the clinical management of FD and on the performance of clinical trials are needed. In recent years, increasing research work has been done in this area. Clinical trials conducted in adequately diagnosed patients that provided validated outcome measurements may result in better insights leading to more effective treatment strategies. Encouraging perspectives have been recently performed by methodologically well-designed treatment studies with herbal drug preparations. Herbal drugs, given their proven efficacy in clinical trials, offer a safe therapeutic alternative in the treatment of FD which is often favored by both patients and physicians. A fixed combination of peppermint oil and caraway oil in patients suffering from FD could be proven effective by well-designed clinical trials.

Symptom-based outcome measures for dyspepsia and GERD trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Symptom assessment using questionnaires has been recommended as the primary outcome measure in clinical gastroesophageal reflux and dyspepsia trials. Questionnaires should have proven reliability, validity, and responsiveness, and may assess the frequency and/or severity of dyspepsia symptoms. Although a number of measures have been developed, it remains unclear which of these should be used in new trials.

OBJECTIVE

To describe existing questionnaire outcome measures that assess symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux dyspepsia for use in clinical trials.

METHODS

Studies were identified from Medline, Embase, the Cochrane library, and reference lists. The inclusion criterion was that the study assessed a questionnaire, which measured the frequency or severity of dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, in a sample of patients.

RESULTS

No direct comparison between questionnaires was possible due to methodological heterogeneity. Thirty-seven studies describing 26 questionnaires met the inclusion criteria. Twelve were unidimensional (assessed symptoms only) and 14 were multidimensional (also assessed quality of life). Eleven questionnaires assessed both frequency and severity of dyspepsia, and 10 had proven reliability, validity, and responsiveness. No studies compared different questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Future gastroesophageal reflux and dyspepsia clinical trials should use unidimensional or multidimensional outcome measures that assess both the frequency and severity of symptoms, and have proven reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Further research is necessary to compare existing outcome measures to determine which are the most reliable, valid, and responsive instruments.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is the main cause of peptic ulcer disease. The role of H pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of H pylori eradication on dyspepsia symptoms in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and keywords, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and with pharmaceutical companies. These searches were updated in October 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All parallel group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs to eradicate H pylori with placebo or other drugs known not to eradicate H pylori for patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected on individual and global dyspeptic symptom scores, quality of life measures and adverse effects. Dyspepsia outcomes were dichotomised into minimal/resolved versus same/worse symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen randomised controlled trials were included in the systematic review. Fourteen trials compared antisecretory dual or triple therapy with placebo antibiotics +/- antisecretory therapy, and evaluated dyspepsia at 3-12 months. Thirteen of these trials gave results as dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3186 patients and there was no significant heterogeneity between the studies. There was a 8% relative risk reduction in the H pylori eradication group (95% CI = 3% to 12%) compared to placebo. The number needed to treat to cure one case of dyspepsia = 18 (95% CI = 12 to 48). A further three trials compared Bismuth based H pylori eradication with an alternative pharmacological agent. These trials were smaller and had a shorter follow-up but suggested H pylori eradication was more effective than either H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate in treating non-ulcer dyspepsia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

H pylori eradication therapy has a small but statistically significant effect in H pylori positive non-ulcer dyspepsia. An economic model suggests this modest benefit may still be cost-effective but more research is needed.

Gastric emptying of solids in children with H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative non-ulcer dyspepsia

OBJECTIVE

There is currently no data available in children on possible relationships among Helicobacter pylori, gastric motility and gastric inflammation. This is a prospective study of gastric emptying (GE) in symptomatic children with and without H. pylori who met symptom-based criteria for non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).

METHODS

47 consecutive dyspeptic patients (23 males; age range, 7 to 18 years) were enrolled. All patients had extensive negative diagnostic investigations. Scintigraphic solid-phase gastric emptying was assessed.

RESULTS

21 H. pylori-positive and 26 H. pylori-negative patients were identified with non-ulcer dyspepsia. The groups were not different in clinical symptoms except that pain related to feeding was more frequent in infected children (P < 0.03). Nodular antral gastritis was found more frequently in the H. pylori positive group (P < 0.0001). The gastritis score was more severe in H. pylori infected than H. pylori negative patients in both fundic and body mucosa (P < 0.001). Within the H. pylori-positive NUD group, the mean half-time GE of a solid meal was significantly accelerated compared to the non-infected group (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the intragastric food distribution and curves of gastric emptying of both groups. A significant relationship was found between the degree of gastric body inflammation gastric emptying, but not antral inflammation. Gastric emptying rate did not differ by sex or age of the subjects in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

In dyspeptic children with H. pylori, gastric emptying of a solid was significantly accelerated compared with symptomatic H. pylori uninfected patients. This suggests that H. pylori is able to induce gastric emptying acceleration. Our findings add more information on H. pylori infection and gastroduodenal disease.

Dyspeptic symptoms associated with Helicobacter pylori infection are influenced by strain and host specific factors

BACKGROUND

Dyspepsia can be associated with H. pylori infection.

AIM

To assess dyspeptic symptoms and potentially influencing factors before and up to 6 months following successful H. pylori eradication therapy.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study involving H. pylori positive subjects from ambulatory or hospitalized care. Main outcome measures were symptoms during baseline and follow-up, the proportion of symptom-free patients, and symptom scores.

RESULTS

After successful eradication, the summary score of all dyspeptic symptoms decreased and during follow-up, the proportion of symptom-free patients was higher in the group with peptic ulcers (69.4% vs. 40.9%, P < 0.0001) than with functional dyspepsia (FD). Regardless of diagnosis, virulent strains of H. pylori were associated with a higher prevalence of epigastric pain before treatment: absolute risk-difference (ARD) with Oip-A: 18.2%, Odds Ratio (OR) 2.35 [1.3-4.2, 95%-CI], P = 0.01; with Cag-A: 24.6%, OR 2.81 [1.6-5], P = 0.01. Low-dose aspirin in part was a major risk factor in FD for previous weight loss bdfore study entry. Post-treatment, non-ulcer patients were more likely to suffer from distention/bloating. Likewise, alcohol induced persistence of nausea and vomiting in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Dyspeptic symptoms in H. pylori infected patients are more common with virulent strains. Symptoms are more likely to persist despite successful eradication if patients initially harboured virulent strains or concomitant aspirin or alcohol intake are present. In one-third of peptic ulcer patients, symptoms will not be cured 3 months after therapy.

Helicobacter pylori eradication is beneficial in the treatment of functional dyspepsia

AIM

To assess whether the eradication of Helicobacter pylori leads to long-term relief of symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

Eight hundred patients with functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with twice-daily 30 mg lansoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin for 7 days (L30AC), twice-daily 15 mg lansoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin for 7 days (L15AC), or once-daily 15 mg lansoprazole for 14 days (LP). Dyspepsia and reflux symptoms were monitored for 12 months.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analysis, the non-ulcer dyspepsia sum score showed a statistically significant benefit in terms of symptom relief in the L30AC group (P = 0.0068) compared with the LP group, but there was no significant difference between the L15AC and LP groups (P = 0.2). When all patients in the two eradication therapy arms were considered together, successful eradication had a significant benefit with regard to the complete absence of symptoms (P < 0.04). H. pylori eradication did not lead to an increase in reflux symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that H. pylori infection causes dyspeptic symptoms in a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia, and that these patients may obtain long-term symptomatic benefit following H. pylori eradication.

Gastric mucosal mast cells are increased in Helicobacter pylori-negative functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Mast cells might be involved in pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia because they can release a wide range of potent mediators, capable of altering gastric nerve and muscle function. This study aimed to determine whether mast cell numbers were increased in the gastric mucosa of patients with functional dyspepsia compared to control subjects.

METHODS

Biopsy samples were taken from the antrum and corpus of 111 patients: 20 asymptomatic control subjects, 62 patients with Rome criteria functional dyspepsia (33 Helicobacter pylori positive, 29 H. pylori negative), and 29 inflammatory control subjects (H. pylori positive). Mast cells were detected immunohistochemically by using a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for tryptase. Quantification was performed with light microscopy, and results were expressed as mast cells/mm(2) +/- standard error of mean.

RESULTS

Mast cells were significantly increased in H. pylori negative functional dyspepsia samples compared to normal control samples in the antrum (230.1 +/- 11.3 vs. 94.8 +/- 8.4, P < 0.001) and corpus (264.1 +/- 27.1 vs. 123.9 +/- 11.5, P = 0.001). Mast cells were also significantly increased in the antrum of patients with H. pylori positive functional dyspepsia compared to asymptomatic control subjects (166.5 +/- 17.0 vs. 94.8 +/- 8.4, P < 0.03). However, there was no significant difference between mast cell numbers in patients with H. pylori positive functional dyspepsia compared to inflammatory control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Mast cells are increased in functional dyspepsia, independently of inflammation. This might contribute to the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia by altering signaling in the brain-gut axis.

A rational approach to uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: review of the literature

In this paper the rationale and limitations of the four most important approach strategies to dyspepsia in primary care (empiric treatment, prompt endoscopy, "test-and-scope", and "test-and-treat") are analysed. It is concluded that in the absence of alarm symptoms, a "test-and-treat" approach is currently the most rational approach provided that three conditions are met: (1) a highly accurate test should be used, (2) the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in the population should not be too low, and (3) an effective anti-H pylori regimen should be prescribed taking sufficient time to instruct and motivate the patient.

Alteration of histological gastritis after cure of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

It is still disputed whether gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia improves after the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM

To clarify the histological changes after the cure of H. pylori infection through a literature survey.

METHODS

Fifty-one selected reports from 1066 relevant articles were reviewed. The extracted data were pooled according to histological parameters of gastritis based on the (updated) Sydney system.

RESULTS

Activity improved more rapidly than inflammation. Eleven of 25 reports described significant improvement of atrophy. Atrophy was not improved in one of four studies with a large sample size (> 100 samples) and in two of five studies with a long follow-up period (> 12 months), suggesting that disagreement between the studies was not totally due to sample size or follow-up period. Methodological flaws, such as patient selection, and statistical analysis based on the assumption that atrophy improves continuously and generally in all patients might be responsible for the inconsistent results. Four of 28 studies described significant improvement of intestinal metaplasia [corrected].

CONCLUSIONS

Activity and inflammation were improved after the cure of H. pylori infection. Atrophy did not improve generally among all patients, but improved in certain patients. Improvement of intestinal metaplasia was difficult to analyse due to methodological problems including statistical power.

Does Helicobacter pylori eradication affect symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia: a 5-year follow-up study

The role of Helicobacter pylori infection in nonulcer dyspepsia remains controversial. To date studies exploring the effect of H. pylori eradication on symptoms have reported conflicting results. Randomised control trials employing validated outcome measures have also been difficult to interpret because of several important issues such as the large placebo response seen in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and both the natural variability in symptoms and symptom severity with time. The association of symptom improvement with resolution of gastritis has meant that the length of follow up employed in most studies has been insufficient. We report the findings of a randomised placebo controlled trial (n = 100), using a validated symptom questionnaire and 5 year follow up to determine the effect of H. pylori eradication on symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia. In all 64 that were reviewed at 5 years there was a significant difference between patients who were H. pylori negative and those who remained positive with regard to complete symptom resolution, consumption of relevant medications and peptic ulcer disease development, in favour of active treatment. There was a trend for gradual symptom improvement over time irrespective of H. pylori status, which may reflect the natural history of this condition. For those who remained symptomatic at 5 years, there was no difference in symptom severity based on H. pylori status. The findings of this study support the use of H. pylori eradication in symptomatic patients with nonulcer dyspepsia both to induce symptom resolution and to prevent disease progression.

Diagnosis of gastritis by means of a combination of serological analyses

BACKGROUND

Gastroscopy and examination of biopsy is normally required for diagnosis of gastritis. This is costly and inconvenient for the patient, and there is a need for a simple pregastroscopic screening method to reduce the endoscopy workload. Our aim was to develop a serological screening test for gastritis.

METHODS

Sera from subjects examined with gastroscopy and biopsy were analyzed for H,K-ATPase antibodies, Helicobacter pylori antibodies and pepsinogen I. The diagnoses were normal gastric mucosa (n=50), duodenal ulcer (n=53) and atrophic corpus gastritis, with (n=50) or without pernicious anemia (n=46).

RESULTS

An evaluation scheme was constructed to optimize the diagnostic agreement between serology and gastric mucosal morphology. The sensitivity to detect gastritis was 98% (146/149) (95% CI 94-100%) and the specificity 84% (42/50) (95% CI 71-93%). Additional sera from 483 subjects from the general population were analyzed. There was a good agreement between serology and gastric mucosal morphology.

CONCLUSIONS

Assays of multiple serum analytes are useful for the initial screening of gastritis. They are complementary to upper gastroscopy by identification of subjects with a normal gastric mucosa, those who qualify for eradication of H. pylori, and those who have developed atrophy and are at risk of developing malignancy and, therefore, require gastroscopic examination.

The Hong Kong index of dyspepsia: a validated symptom severity questionnaire for patients with dyspepsia

AIM

Locally validated symptom questionnaires are essential instruments in dyspepsia research. A symptom score for Chinese dyspeptics was developed. Multiple aspects of validity and reliability were assessed.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with endoscopy-negative dyspepsia and 65 healthy controls were presented with a list of 24 previously determined common abdominal symptoms and asked to rate the severity in a five point Likert scale. Comprehensibility and relevance of symptoms were assessed. The questionnaire was administered 3 h later to assess for reproducibility. A locally validated Short Form-36 quality-of-life questionnaire was also administered. Cisapride 5 mg thrice daily was prescribed to dyspeptic patients but not to the controls. The dyspepsia symptom and SF-36 questionnaires were repeated after 3 weeks for patients under treatment. Global change in symptoms and the need for further medical care were assessed. Concept, content, construct and criterion validity, consistency and reproducibility of the dyspepsia symptom questionnaire were assessed.

RESULTS

All items were considered comprehensible by more than 90% of subjects. Relevance of individual symptoms to dyspeptic patients ranged from 10.8-76.9%. Twelve items were selected by logistic regression to account for most of the differences between control and dyspeptic patients. Test-retest reproducibility and internal consistency were good with the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.90. A cut-off score of equal to or greater than 16 was determined to discriminate between controls and dyspeptic patients. The dyspepsia score correlated negatively with all domains of the SF-36 quality of life scale except physical functioning. The dyspepsia questionnaire also discriminated between patients who reported a subjective improvement in symptoms and those who reported no change or worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

The dyspepsia symptom index was easy to understand, internally consistent and reproducible. It predicted global symptom change, and the symptom severity scores correlated negatively with quality of life.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori and nonulcer dyspepsia

Although up to 50% of patients diagnosed with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) have Helicobacter pylori infection and underlying chronic gastritis, it remains controversial whether any causal relationship exists. The results of worldwide epidemiological studies have been unconvincing. No clear-cut link has been documented between H. pylori and any specific symptom profile or pathophysiological mechanism in NUD. In the randomized controlled trials, methodological weaknesses may explain in part the conflicting results, but even in the well-conducted trials controversy persists. Although meta-analyses have attempted to resolve the issue, inherent methodological difficulties with meta-analysis remain a problem. Moreover, even the methodologically sound meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. In addition, predictors of treatment response remain obscure, and there continue to be theoretical concerns about the treatment of H. pylori infection in all patients with NUD. Hence, the management of these patients is challenging, but eradication of H. pylori infection may be beneficial in a small subgroup of cases with NUD that cannot be identified before treatment.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori gastritis improves dyspeptic symptoms in children

BACKGROUND

In adults, the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection is only recommended for patients with active gastric or duodenal ulcers. It is not known whether similar guidelines can be applied to children because the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in childhood is estimated to be much lower than in adults. The purpose of this study was to determine whether treatment of H. pylori gastritis would improve symptoms of dyspepsia in children.

METHODS

Sixteen patients (5 boys, 11 girls) aged 14 +/- 1.2 years who had symptoms of dyspepsia were evaluated using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies to establish the diagnosis of H. pylori gastritis. They were treated for 2 weeks with clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and a proton pump inhibitor. Dyspepsia symptoms were evaluated by a questionnaire before and after treatment of the infection. The effect of H. pylori treatment on the total symptom score was analyzed with use of the Student t test. Values are presented as mean +/- SEM.

RESULTS

All patients had antral nodularity and chronic active gastritis with spiral-shaped organisms but no evidence of peptic ulcer disease. Mean total symptom score decreased significantly at 2 to 4 weeks after treatment (12.6 +/- 0.9 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.5 P < 0.001), and it remained low (2.9 +/- 0.7) at follow-up 9.7 +/- 1.4 months (range, 2-24 months later).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the treatment of H. pylori gastritis can improve dyspeptic symptoms in children.

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in benign laryngeal disorders

Helicobacter pylori (HP) is an accepted cause of chronic active gastritis and has a major causative role in peptic ulcers. It is a gastric carcinogen. Its role in nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) is less clear, yet 50% of patients with NUD are infected with HP, and some recent literature demonstrates long-term improvement of symptoms following eradication. HP has been investigated in several other organ systems, but has not been investigated to any major degree in laryngeal disorders, a region that could be directly exposed to the bacterium from pharyngolaryngeal reflux. This study represents one arm of a larger study designed to investigate such a relationship. Of 101 patients with nonmalignant voice disorders presenting to our voice clinics, 54.5% tested positive for the H. pylori organism. Of the controls, 47.1% tested positive. When striated into age groups of < 45 years, 46-61 years, and > 62 years, and then age-matched with the controls, the likelihood of infection with the H. pylori organism was greater in both the experimental middle group, and in the middle group when combined with the elder group, than in the matched controls, and this difference demonstrated a trend approaching statistical significance. This finding is discussed in the light of other studies on HP and on gastroesophageal reflex (GER).

Optimal management of patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia: considerations for the treatment of the elderly

Optimal therapy for patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia still remains elusive. Increasing consensus on the definition of non-ulcer dyspepsia may improve the design of clinical trials and result in more effective therapies for this common condition. This paper reviews the investigation, pathophysiology and therapy of non-ulcer dyspepsia in order to formulate management strategies in the elderly. The best outcome for the patient can be achieved by detailed evaluation, leading to therapy targeted to obvious precipitating factors such as dyspepsia-inducing medications and other aggravating factors such as slow-transit constipation. Prokinetics and, to a lesser extent, H(2) receptor antagonists are the main medications of choice. Cisapride, the best studied prokinetic, has been withdrawn from the market in certain countries because some patients experienced dangerous cardiac arrhythmias, especially when cisapride was given with potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4. Time spent on reassurance and judicious use of antidepressants for the right patient can help improve symptoms. In the elderly, however, persistent symptoms should be re-evaluated because of the increased incidence of malignancy.

Double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre studies of rebamipide, a gastroprotective drug, in the treatment of functional dyspepsia with or without Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia is a problem that is difficult to treat in clinical practice.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rebamipide (a cytoprotective drug) in functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

Patients with functional dyspepsia (n=557) were divided a priori into two studies by Helicobacter pylori status, and enrolled in a 2-week baseline evaluation period. Ninety-nine patients with Helicobacter pylori and 173 patients without Helicobacter pylori, continuing to have at least moderate upper abdominal pain or discomfort, were randomly assigned to rebamipide 100 mg, rebamipide 200 mg or placebo, three times a day, in a double-blind design for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement of individual symptom scores from baseline in all the treatment arms. No significant improvement of individual symptom scores was observed in either rebamipide group at the end of the studies compared to placebo, although the belching score was significantly reduced in the rebamipide 100 mg and 200 mg groups at week 2 (P=0.017 and P=0.012, respectively) in the Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. The ratio of patients who requested usage of the study medication again was greater in the rebamipide 100 mg (85%) and 200 mg (96%, P=0.020) groups compared with the placebo group (72%) among Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. There were no serious study medication related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Rebamipide was not superior to placebo in terms of individual symptoms at the end of treatment.

Helicobacter pylori eradication and standardized 3-month omeprazole therapy in functional dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

The role of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia remains unclear. This study evaluated the long term consequences for symptoms and quality of life in patients with H. pylori-positive functional dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication therapy with a standardized 3-month omeprazole treatment.

METHODS

A total of 151 H. pylori-positive patients with functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive either eradication therapy or placebo-antibiotics. The initial medication was administered in a double-blinded fashion. In addition, to standardize acid suppression, every patient received omeprazole therapy for the first 3-month period. Dyspeptic symptoms were evaluated by a questionnaire every 3 months, and quality of life was measured by a validated RAND 36-item health survey 1.0 questionnaire at the beginning of the study and after 12 months of follow-up. As the main outcome measure, the scores of patients who had received H. pylori eradication therapy and omeprazole were compared with those who received placebo and omeprazole during the 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients completed the 1-yr follow-up. In all, 77 patients received eradication therapy and 74 patients remained as controls. After 12 months, the mean reduction in the dyspepsia score was 28.8% in patients with H. pylori eradication therapy and 21.7% in the control group. The reduction of dyspepsia was significant (p < 0.0001) in both groups compared to baseline value, but no statistically significant differences in changes of dyspeptic symptoms or in quality of life were demonstrated between the H. pylori eradication therapy group and controls after 1 yr. In both patient groups, regurgitation (p < 0.001) and heartburn (p < 0.01) revealed relapse after cessation of 3-month omeprazole treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No clear differences in symptoms or in quality of life were found between patients treated with H. pylori eradication therapy and omeprazole compared with patients receiving placebo and omeprazole after 1 yr. Regardless of H. pylori status, omeprazole treatment reduced heartburn and regurgitation. The placebo effect on the symptoms of functional dyspepsia and on quality of life was marked.

Functional dyspepsia symptoms, gastric emptying and satiety provocative test: analysis of relationships

BACKGROUND

The correlation between symptoms and observed impaired function in functional dyspepsia is still inconsistent. The aims of the study were to obtain a measure of satiety by a meal test; to verify whether this compares with severity of symptoms assessed using a reproducible questionnaire; and to correlate the parameters of satiety test and gastric emptying with all the dyspeptic symptoms.

METHODS

Fifty-two functional dyspepsia patients reported their symptoms on a standardized questionnaire that considered belching, bloating, early satiety, epigastric pain and burning, nausea, postprandial fullness and vomiting. They were monitored for gastric emptying of a solid caloric meal using a radionuclide technique and underwent a test to quantify meal-induced satiety by a liquid caloric meal.

RESULTS

The number of kilocalories ingested during the satiety test until the occurrence of maximum satiety in healthy subjects was 110% higher than in the dyspeptic group (mean +/- s(mean): 1110 +/- 23 versus 532 +/- 56; P < 0.01). We found a significant positive correlation between gastric emptying rate and kcal of the satiety test (P < 0.01; r = 0.428). Logistic regression showed a significant inverse association between severity of early satiety-coded as absent, mild, moderate or severe, kcal of meal test (P = 0.01), and gastric emptying lag phase (P = 0.03). Bloating was associated directly with t(1/2) of gastric emptying (P = 0.03) and inversely with lag phase (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The satiety test gives a fine numerical measure of satiety and confirms the results of a symptoms questionnaire. Our study showed an indirect correlation between severity of early satiety--as measured by the satiety test, and gastric emptying rate, as well as an association between bloating and delayed gastric emptying.

Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment does not benefit patients with nonulcer dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the still controversial role of treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of 7 days of eradication treatment (lansoprazole 15 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin I g b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.) with a control treatment (lansoprazole 15 mg b.i.d. and placebo) in H. pylori-infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. 13C breath tests were performed at baseline and during follow-up. We assessed patient symptoms, health status (based on the SF-12 questionnaire), patient satisfaction, drug consumption, health care consultation behavior, and absenteeism related to dyspepsia over a 1-yr period.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients randomized to eradication treatment and 70 patients randomized to placebo were compared. The rate of eradication of H. pylori infection was 75% in the active treatment group and 4% in the placebo group (p < 0.005). The symptom score improved to a similar extent in the group receiving active treatment (-4.0; 95% CI = -5.0 to -3.0) and placebo (-3.6; 95% CI = -4.5 to -2.7). Treatment response was not related to the severity or duration of initial symptoms or to the severity of gastritis on histology. Quality of life scores were comparable at 12 months. There was no significant difference in dyspepsia-related absenteeism or satisfaction with management of NUD. Patients receiving active treatment were more likely not to have had to use any dyspepsia treatment over the 12 months (60.8% vs 44.3%; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate any substantial benefit of curing H. pylori infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. The study adds further evidence that H. pylori is not the main pathogenetic or therapeutic target in these patients.

There are some benefits for eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and non-ulcer dyspepsia is not established.

AIM

To determine whether eradication of H. pylori might be of benefit in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 129 H. pylori infected patients with severe epigastric pain, without gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, to receive twice daily treatment with 300 mg of ranitidine, 1000 mg of amoxicillin, and 500 mg of clarithromycin for 7 days and 124 such patients to receive identical-appearing placebos.

RESULTS

Treatment was successful (decrease of symptoms at 12 months) in 62% of patients in the active-treatment group and in 60% of the placebo group (N.S.). At 12 months, the rate of eradication of H. pylori was 69% in the active-treatment group and 18% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Complete relief of symptoms occurred significantly more frequently in patients on the active treatment (43%) than in placebo-treated patients (31%, P=0.048). Within the active-treatment group, therapeutic success was significantly more frequent in the non-infected patients (84% vs. 64%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although eradicating H. pylori is not likely to relieve symptoms in the majority of patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia, a small proportion of H. pylori-infected patients may benefit from eradication treatment.

Dyspepsia: challenges in diagnosis and selection of treatment

BACKGROUND

Despite considerable study, the pathophysiology of dyspepsia remains obscure. This and other factors have impeded development of precise and effective treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE

This paper provides a brief review of the clinical syndrome of dyspepsia and its pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

METHODS

To identify articles for inclusion in this review, a search of MEDLINE was conducted using the key word dyspepsia. Because the literature on this topic is voluminous and duplicative, the search was limited primarily to literature from the last decade and to articles concerning dyspepsia in adults.

RESULTS

The symptoms of dyspepsia, which may include epigastric pain, heartburn. bloating, and early satiety, defy diagnosis in as many as 50% of patients, even after endoscopy and other appropriate studies. In the other half of patients, such causative disorders as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcer disease, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and gastric cancer may be diagnosed. Despite controversy regarding the selection of therapy, empiric treatment is common for apparent idiopathic dyspepsia. Histamine2-receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), promotility agents, and coating agents have all been used as empiric therapy for dyspeptic symptoms. With empiric treatment, subsequent management is directed by the therapeutic response. In the absence of a definitive diagnosis, treatment is usually selected on the basis of the type and severity of symptoms, a thorough history and physical examination, and factors such as age and the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Five PPIs are currently available--lansoprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole--all with established efficacy in GERD and other acid-mediated disorders. The PPIs can be expected to be useful in certain patients with dyspepsia, and may be prescribed for patients who are found to re- spond to potent antisecretory therapy. Patients' concern about their symptoms, practical considerations, and restrictions imposed by managed care organizations may all affect the choice between empiric therapy and early endoscopy in patients with dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the variety of therapeutic options available for the symptoms of dyspepsia, the many presentations of this condition and the uncertainty of the response to the currently available therapeutic options continue to pose a substantial clinical challenge.

SODA (severity of dyspepsia assessment): a new effective outcome measure for dyspepsia-related health

The aim of this research was to develop and evaluate an instrument for measuring dyspepsia-related health to serve as the primary outcome measure for randomized clinical trials. Building on our previous work we developed SODA (Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment), a multidimensional dyspepsia measure. We evaluated SODA by administering it at enrollment and seven follow-up visits to 98 patients with dyspepsia who were randomized to a 6-week course of omeprazole versus placebo and followed over 1 year. The mean age was 53 years, and six patients (6%) were women. Median Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates over the eight visits for the SODA Pain Intensity, Non-Pain Symptoms, and Satisfaction scales were 0.97, 0.90, and 0.92, respectively. The mean change scores for all three scales discriminated between patients who reported they were improved versus those who were unchanged, providing evidence of validity. The effect sizes for the Pain Intensity (.98) and Satisfaction (.87) scales were large, providing evidence for responsiveness. The effect size for the Non-Pain Symptoms scale was small (.24), indicating lower responsiveness in this study sample. SODA is a new, effective instrument for measuring dyspepsia-related health. SODA is multidimensional and responsive to clinically meaningful change with demonstrated reliability and validity.

Fish oil (Eicosapen) is less effective than metronidazole, in combination with pantoprazole and clarithromycin, for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

In vitro omega-3-fatty acids (Eicosapen) are bacteriostatic to Helicobacter pylori and have a variety of immuno-modulating effects.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of eicosapen (E) as an antibiotic-sparing component of a triple H. pylori eradication regimen in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients in a randomized, double-blind trial.

METHODS

Non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (n=199), with a normal upper endoscopy and a positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT) were randomly assigned to either pantoprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole (PCM) or pantoprazole, clarithromycin and eicosapen (PCE) for 7 days. Four weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was determined by UBT. Symptoms were followed up to 16 months.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat population, PCM eradicated infection in 78% but PCE was successful in only 34% (P < 0.001). Symptomatic improvement occurred in both groups, and was not related to H. pylori eradication.

CONCLUSION

Eicosapen is unlikely to be useful in H. pylori eradication regimens.

Quality of life in functional dyspepsia: responsiveness of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index and development of a new 10-item short form

BACKGROUND

The Nepean Dyspepsia Index is a reliable and valid measure of quality of life in functional dyspepsia, but responsiveness has been little studied. The Nepean Dyspepsia Index originally contained 42 items designed to measure impairment of a subject's ability to engage in relevant aspects of their life because of dyspepsia, and their enjoyment of these aspects; in addition, the individual importance of areas was assessed. It was subsequently shortened to 25 items, yielding five sub-scales.

AIM

To test the Nepean Dyspepsia Index's responsiveness and develop a responsive, very short form.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind controlled trial was performed in 589 patients with documented functional dyspepsia. Symptoms and quality of life were measured at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks. Responsiveness of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index quality-of-life section was evaluated by correlation with symptom scores and calculation of standardized changes in scores. Two items from each sub-scale which best represented the area of life (by factor loadings) were selected to create the 10-item short form (SF; short form-Nepean Dyspepsia Index). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and responsiveness was assessed as above.

RESULTS

The Nepean Dyspepsia Index quality-of-life scales demonstrated excellent responsiveness to change in both the active and placebo arms (standardized response means all > 1.0). The Nepean Dyspepsia Index accounted for only 8% of the variance in percentage change in symptoms (by visual analogue scales), indicating that it was evaluating areas of life not covered by symptoms. The 10-item short form had adequate internal consistency (all scales > or = 0.70) and all strongly (and significantly) correlated with the long form sub-scales; it was also highly responsive.

CONCLUSION

The Nepean Dyspepsia Index is a responsive disease-specific quality-of-life measure; the 10-item short form can be applied in clinical trials of functional dyspepsia.