Patterns of nuclear immunofluorescence and reactivities to recombinant nuclear antigens in autoimmune hepatitis

Anti-Ro52 Autoantibody Is Common in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Correlating with Worse Outcome when Associated with interstitial lung disease in Systemic Sclerosis and Autoimmune Myositis

This review highlights the 30 plus years research progress since the discovery of autoantibody to Ro52/TRIM21 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren's syndrome (SjS). After the initial expression cloning of the Ro52 cDNA, it has taken many years to the current understanding in the interesting biological function of Ro52 as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and its role in innate immune clearance of intracellular IgG-bound complex. Early observations show that anti-Ro52, mostly associated with anti-SS-A/Ro60 and/or anti-SS-B/La, is commonly found in SLE (40-70%), SjS (70-90%), neonatal lupus erythematosus (NLE, 75-90%), and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (50-60%). Anti-Ro52 has long been postulated to play a direct pathogenic role in congenital heart block in NLE as well as in the QT interval prolongation in some adults. The widespread availability of the anti-Ro52 assay has led to the detection of anti-Ro52 in other diseases including autoimmune hepatitis (20-40%), systemic sclerosis (10-30%), and autoimmune myositis (20-40%). More than ten studies have pointed to an association of anti-Ro52 with interstitial lung disease and, more importantly, correlating with poor outcome and worse survival. Other studies are implicating an interesting role for anti-Ro52 in the diagnosis of certain cancers. Future studies are needed to examine the mechanism in the pathogenesis of anti-Ro52 and carefully documenting its causal relationships in different disease conditions.

Challenges and opportunities in achieving effective regulatory T cell therapy in autoimmune liver disease

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) include autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). These immune-mediated liver diseases involve a break down in peripheral self-tolerance with largely unknown aetiology. Regulatory T cells (Treg) are crucial in maintaining immunological tolerance. Hence, Treg immunotherapy is an attractive therapeutic option in AILD. Currently, AILD do not have a curative treatment option and patients take life-long immunosuppression or bile acids to control hepatic or biliary inflammation. Clinical investigations using good manufacturing practice (GMP) Treg in autoimmune liver disease have thus far demonstrated that Treg therapy is safe and that Treg migrate to inflamed liver tissue. For Treg immunotherapy to achieve efficacy in AILD, Treg must be retained within the liver and maintain their suppressive phenotype to dampen ongoing immune responses to hepatocytes and biliary epithelium. Therefore, therapeutic Treg subsets should be selected for tissue residency markers and maximal functionality. Optimisation of dosing regime and understanding longevity of Treg in vivo are critical to successful Treg therapy. It is also essential to consider combination therapy options to complement infused Treg, for instance low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) to support pre-existing and infused Treg survival and suppressive function. Understanding the hepatic microenvironment in both early- and late-stage AILD presents significant opportunity to better tailor Treg therapy in different patient groups. Modification of a hostile microenvironment to a more favourable one either prior to or during Treg therapy could enhance the efficacy and longevity of infused GMP-Treg. Applying recent technology to discovery of autoantigen responses in AILD, T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing and use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology represents the next frontier for disease-specific CAR-Treg therapies. Consideration of all these aspects in future trials and discovery research would position GMP Treg immunotherapy as a viable personalised-medicine treatment option for effective control of autoimmune liver diseases.

Update of the simplified criteria for autoimmune hepatitis: Evaluation of the methodology for immunoserological testing

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) include immunofluorescence testing (IFT) of antinuclear and smooth muscle autoantibodies (ANA and SMA) on rodent tissue sections. We aimed to establish scoring criteria for the implementation of ANA IFT on human epithelioma-2 (HEp-2) cells and ELISA-based testing.

METHODS

ANA and SMA reactivity of 61 AIH sera and 72 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease controls were separately assessed on tissue sections and HEp-2 cells to compare the diagnostic value at increasing titers. A total of 113 patients with AIH at diagnosis and 202 controls from 3 European centers were assessed by IFT as well as 3 different commercially available ANA ELISA and 1 anti-F-actin ELISA.

RESULTS

ANA assessment by IFT on liver sections had 83.6% sensitivity and 69.4% specificity for AIH at a titer of 1:40. On HEp-2 cells, sensitivity and specificity were 75.4% and 73.6%, respectively, at an adjusted titer of 1:160. Area under the curve (AUC) values of ANA ELISA ranged from 0.70-0.87, with ELISA coated with HEp-2 extracts in addition to selected antigens performing significantly better. SMA assessment by IFT had the highest specificity for the SMA-VG/T pattern and anti-microfilament reactivity on HEp-2 cells. ELISA-based anti-F-actin evaluation was a strong predictor of AIH (AUC 0.88) and performed better than SMA assessment by IFT (AUC 0.77-0.87).

CONCLUSION

At adjusted cut-offs, both ANA IFT using HEp-2 cells and ELISA-based autoantibody evaluation for ANA and SMA are potential alternatives to tissue-based IFT for the diagnosis of AIH.

LAY SUMMARY

Autoantibodies are a hallmark of autoimmune hepatitis and are traditionally tested for by immunofluorescence assays on rodent tissue sections. Herein, we demonstrate that human epithelioma cells can be used as a reliable substrate for immunofluorescence testing. ELISA-based testing is also a potentially reliable alternative for autoantibody assessment in autoimmune hepatitis. We propose the implementation of these testing methods into the simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis.

Pathogens and autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe form of hepatitis resulting in the autoimmune-mediated destruction of the liver parenchyma. Whereas many of the immunopathogenic events have been elucidated and some of the drivers of the disease have been identified, little is known about the aetiology of the disease. There are certain risk factors, such as particular human leucocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, that enhance the susceptibility for AIH or influence the severity of the disease. However, as for many other autoimmune diseases, the mere presence of such risk factors does not warrant the occurrence of the disease. Not all individuals carrying risk factors develop AIH, and not all patients with AIH are carriers of high-risk alleles. Thus, additional environmental factors need to be considered as triggers for AIH. Environmental factors include diet, sunlight exposure, stress, medication and hygiene, as well as pathogen infections and vaccinations. This review discusses if pathogens should be considered as triggers for the initiation and/or propagation of AIH.

Animal models of autoimmune hepatitis

Many animal models for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have been described in the past. Most models had to deal with the relative immunosuppressive environment of the liver. Therefore, some models used a combination of several triggering factors often on a susceptible background to generate an aggressive immune response that targets the liver. In addition, in order to be able to track the immune response the models used specific model autoantigens as targets that are either not present or have not been identified as a natural autoantigen in AIH patients. Thereby the feasibility of such models is somewhat questionable. Although many historic approaches included challenges of experimental animals with liver homogenates it was only in the last decade that natural occurring liver autoantigens have been used in animal models. This article reflects on the requirements for breaking liver tolerance and on how an ideal experimental model for AIH would look like. In addition, it discusses historic as well as recent animal models in the context of feasibility of induction, similarity of the clinical outcome to human AIH, and gain of knowledge for possible future therapies.

Neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps in the liver and gastrointestinal system

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have an important role during infection by helping neutrophils to capture and kill pathogens. However, evidence is accumulating that uncontrolled or excessive production of NETs is related to the exacerbation of inflammation and the development of autoimmunity, cancer metastasis and inappropriate thrombosis. In this Review, we focus on the role of NETs in the liver and gastrointestinal system, outlining their protective and pathological effects. The latest mechanistic insights in NET formation, interactions between microorganisms and NETs and the relationship between neutrophil subtypes and their functions are also discussed. Additionally, we describe the potential importance of NET-related molecules, including cell-free DNA and hypercitrullinated histones, as biomarkers and targets for therapeutic intervention in gastrointestinal diseases.

Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Liver Disease-Clinical and Diagnostic Relevance

Testing for liver-related autoantibodies should be included in the workup of patients with hepatitis or cholestasis of unknown origin. Although most of these autoantibodies are not disease specific, their determination is a prerequisite to diagnose autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and they are components of the diagnostic scoring system in these diseases. In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), on the other hand, autoantibodies are frequently present but play a minor role in establishing the diagnosis. In PSC, however, data on antibodies suggest a link between disease pathogenesis and the intestinal microbiota. This review will focus on practical aspects of antibody testing in the three major autoimmune liver diseases AIH, PBC, and PSC.

Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Hepatitis: Can Epitopes Tell Us about the Etiology of the Disease?

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are serious autoimmune liver diseases that are characterized by a progressive destruction of the liver parenchyma and/or the hepatic bile ducts and the development of chronic fibrosis. Left untreated autoimmune liver diseases are often life-threatening, and patients require a liver transplantation to survive. Thus, an early and reliable diagnosis is paramount for the initiation of a proper therapy with immunosuppressive and/or anticholelithic drugs. Besides the analysis of liver biopsies and serum markers indicating liver damage, the screening for specific autoantibodies is an indispensable tool for the diagnosis of autoimmune liver diseases. Such liver autoantigen-specific antibodies might be involved in the disease pathogenesis, and their epitope specificity may give some insight into the etiology of the disease. Here, we will mainly focus on the generation and specificity of autoantibodies in AIH patients. In addition, we will review data from animal models that aim toward a better understanding of the origins and pathogenicity of such autoantibodies.

"Autoimmune(-Like)" Drug and Herb Induced Liver Injury: New Insights into Molecular Pathogenesis

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and hepatic injury due to herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) can adapt clinical characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), such as the appearance of autoantibodies and infiltration of the liver by immune competent cells. To describe these cases of DILI/HDS, the poorly-defined term "autoimmune(-like)" DILI/HDS came up. It is uncertain if these cases represent a subgroup of DILI/HDS with distinct pathomechanistic and prognostic features different from "classical" DILI/HDS. Besides, due to the overlap of clinical characteristics of "immune-mediated" DILI/HDS and AIH, both entities are not easy to differentiate. However, the demarcation is important, especially with regard to treatment: AIH requires long-term, mostly lifelong immunosuppression, whereas DILI/HDS does not. Only through exact diagnostic evaluation, exclusion of differential diagnoses and prolonged follow-up can the correct diagnosis reliably be made. Molecular mechanisms have not been analysed for the subgroup of "autoimmune(-like)" DILI/HDS yet. However, several pathogenetic checkpoints of DILI/HDS in general and AIH are shared. An analysis of these shared mechanisms might hint at relevant molecular processes of "autoimmune(-like)" DILI/HDS.

Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis: Current Status and Future Directions

Autoimmune hepatitis is characterized by autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, and interface hepatitis on histological examination. The features lack diagnostic specificity, and other diseases that may resemble autoimmune hepatitis must be excluded. The clinical presentation may be acute, acute severe (fulminant), or asymptomatic; conventional autoantibodies may be absent; centrilobular necrosis and bile duct changes may be present; and the disease may occur after liver transplantation or with features that suggest overlapping disorders. The diagnostic criteria have been codified, and diagnostic scoring systems can support clinical judgment. Nonstandard autoantibodies, including antibodies to actin, α-actinin, soluble liver antigen, perinuclear antineutrophil antigen, asialoglycoprotein receptor, and liver cytosol type 1, are tools that can support the diagnosis, especially in patients with atypical features. Prednisone or prednisolone in combination with azathioprine is the preferred treatment, and strategies using these medications in various doses can ameliorate treatment failure, incomplete response, drug intolerance, and relapse after drug withdrawal. Budesonide, mycophenolate mofetil, and calcineurin inhibitors can be considered in selected patients as frontline or salvage therapies. Molecular (recombinant proteins and monoclonal antibodies), cellular (adoptive transfer and antigenic manipulation), and pharmacological (antioxidants, antifibrotics, and antiapoptotic agents) interventions constitute future directions in management. The evolving knowledge of the pathogenic pathways and the advances in technology promise new management algorithms.

Clinical aspects of indirect immunofluorescence for autoimmune diseases

Because the most common term used in conversations considering autoimmunity is autoantibodies, it is well-expected that the indirect immunofluorescence assay, which detects antibodies directed against various antigens, is one of our most impressive techniques for investigating autoimmune diseases (AIDs). Roughly speaking, the current literature corroborates that this immunopathologic investigation means that autoantibodies detection makes a considerable contribution to both diagnostic and prognostic aspects of AIDs in the clinical setting. However, it varies between different AIDs, autoantibodies, ethnicities or detection methodologies. Directly focusing on the indirect immunofluorescence assay, we present evidence to support this multidimensional variation regarding the subject via reviewing briefly the best-investigated autoantibodies in the well-documented AIDs, including vasculitis, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren's syndrome.

Update on Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), a liver disorder affecting both children and adults, is characterized by inflammatory liver histology, elevated transaminase levels, circulating nonorganspecific autoantibodies, and increased levels of immunoglobulin G, in the absence of a known etiology. Two types of AIH are recognized according to seropositivity: smooth muscle antibody and/or antinuclear antibody define AIH type 1 and antibodies to liver-kidney microsome type 1 and/or liver cytosol type 1 define AIH type 2. AIH type 1 affects both adults and children, while AIH type 2 is mainly a paediatric disease, though it does occasionally affects young adults. AIH should be considered during the diagnostic workup of any patient with increased liver enzyme levels. AIH is exquisitely responsive to immunosuppressive treatment with prednisolone with or without azathioprine, with symptom free long-term survival for the majority of patients. For those who do not respond to standard treatment, or who are difficult-to-treat, mycophenolate mofetil and, in the absence of a response, calcineurin inhibitors should be tried in addition to steroids. The pathogenesis of AIH is not fully understood, although there is mounting evidence that genetic susceptibility, molecular mimicry and impaired immunoregulatory networks contribute to the initiation and perpetuation of the autoimmune attack. Liver damage is thought to be mediated primarily by CD4 T-cells, although recent studies support the involvement of diverse populations, including Th17 cells. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of AIH is likely to contribute to the development of novel treatments, such as the adoptive transfer of autologous expanded antigenspecific regulatory T-cells, which ultimately aim at restoring tolerance to liver-derived antigens.

Prevalence of antinuclear antibodies in schoolchildren during puberty and possible relationship with musculoskeletal pain: a longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

The role of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in children has still to be elucidated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and persistence of ANA in schoolchildren during the puberty switch, and the possible relationship with chronic noninflammatory musculoskeletal pain (MSP).

METHODS

Children aged 8-13 years and attending 4 public schools underwent a clinical examination, focusing on pubertal stage and presence of chronic noninflammatory MSP. Laboratory tests to determine the autoantibody-profile were also performed. Subjects with ANA positivity (titer ≥ 1:80) and/or chronic noninflammatory MSP were re-evaluated 3 years later.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-one subjects enrolled in the study and 12.3% were ANA-positive, equally distributed in terms of sex and pubertal status. Three years later, in the group of patients studied for chronic noninflammatory MSP (n = 67), ANA positivity significantly increased from 13.4% to 44.8%. In the ANA-positive cohort at baseline (n = 28), 92.9% of subjects were confirmed as being ANA-positive with a significantly increased titer. No association between ANA positivity and chronic noninflammatory MSP was found.

CONCLUSION

ANA prevalence and titers increase during puberty, especially in females, but have no relationship with chronic noninflammatory MSP. This finding may be related to the complex hormonal changes during the puberty switch period and opens new insights into autoimmunity.

Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies and antibodies to a soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas in autoimmune hepatitis

Background

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA), smooth muscle antibodies (SMA) and antibodies to a soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas (anti-SLA/LP) are useful markers that can help clinicians to diagnose and classify autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

Objectives

To determine whether ANA, SMA and anti-SLA/LP help to accurately diagnose patients with AIH.

Search strategy

The PubMed, CNKI, WANFANG, and SinoMed databases were accessed to retrieve studies published in English and Chinese. Studies published up to October 2013 were reviewed.

Selection criteria

Studies on the diagnostic value of ANA, SMA or anti-SLA/LP in the diagnosis of known or suspected AIH were included.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors evaluated studies independently and rated their methodological quality using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tools; relevant data were abstracted. The random-effects method was used to summarize sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) from all 29 studies.

Results

The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and DOR for ANA were 0.650 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.619 to 0.680), 0.751 (95%CI, 0.737 to 0.764), 3.030 (95%CI, 2.349 to 3.910), 0.464 (95%CI, 0.356 to 0.604), and 7.380 (95%CI, 4.344 to 12.539), respectively. For SMA, the values were 0.593 (95%CI, 0.564 to 0.621), 0.926 (95%CI, 0.917 to 0.934), 11.740 (95%CI, 7.379 to 18.678), 0.449 (95%CI, 0.367 to 0.549), and 31.553 (95%CI, 17.147 to 58.060), respectively. Finally, for anti-SLA/LP, the values were 0.194 (95%CI, 0.168 to 0.222), 0.989 (95%CI, 0.985 to 0.993), 11.089 (95%CI, 7.601 to 16.177), 0.839 (95%CI, 0.777 to 0.905), and 16.867 (95%CI, 10.956 to 25.967), respectively.

Authors’ conclusions

ANA provided moderate sensitivity and specificity, while SMA gave moderate sensitivity and high specificity, and anti-SLA/LP exhibited low sensitivity and high specificity. All three antibodies were limited by their unsatisfactory sensitivities and lack of consistency.

Diagnostic and clinical significance of anti-centromere antibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an autoimmune disease of the liver characterised by biochemical evidence of cholestasis, elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and the presence of the highly disease specific anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies. Extra-hepatic autoimmune manifestations are common, including rheumatic disorders, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc). Notably, PBC is the most frequent autoimmune liver disease in SSc patients. Based on skin lesion extension, two major SSc disease subgroups are recognised: limited cutaneous SSc (lSSc) and diffuse cutaneous SSc. Anti-centromere antibody (ACA) positivity is highly characteristic of SSc, with up to 90% prevalence in lSSc patients. ACA has also been found in up to 30% of PBC patients and 80% of patients with a PBC/SSc overlap syndrome. The diagnostic and clinical significance of ACA positivity in patients with PBC without SSc has recently been under investigation, with several studies highlighting links to severe bile duct injury and portal hypertension. This review discusses the diagnostic and clinical relevance of ACA in patients with PBC, with or without SSc.

Common and specific associations of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Little information exists about the association of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 with systemic lupus erytematosus (SLE) features. In this work, we analysed the associations of both anti-Ro reactivities with clinical and immunological manifestations in 141 SLE patients. Photosensitivity and xerophtalmia/xerostomia were found to be positively associated with both anti-SSA/Ro60 (P = 0.024 and P = 0.019, resp.) and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 (P = 0.026 and P = 0.022, resp.). In contrast, a negative association was detected regarding anti-phospholipid antibodies, anti-SSA/Ro60 having a stronger effect (P = 0.014) than anti-Ro52/TRIM21. Anti-SSA/Ro60 showed a specific positive association with hypocomplementemia (P = 0.041), mainly with low C4 levels (P = 0.008), whereas anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was found to be positively associated with Raynaud's phenomenon (P = 0.026) and cytopenia (P = 0.048) and negatively associated with anti-dsDNA (P = 0.013). Lymphocytes are involved in the relationship between anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and cytopenia since positive patients showed lower cell levels than negative patients (P = 0.036). In conclusion, anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 showed both common and specific associations in SLE. These data thus increase evidence of the different associations of the two anti-Ro specificities even in a particular disease.

Autoantibody profile in individuals with chronic hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION

Autoantibodies are often produced during infection with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), but it remains controversial whether they influence the biochemical profile and histological features of this disease. Therefore, this current study sought to describe these autoantibodies and evaluate their impact on the clinical and histological presentation of hepatitis C.

METHODS

This cross-sectional analytical study assessed patients with HCV (RNA+) from October 2011 to July 2012.

RESULTS

This study included 66 patients, with a mean age of 53.2±10.5 years. Of these patients, 60.6% were male, and 54.3% presented with genotype 1. Non-organ-specific autoantibodies (NOSA) were detected in 24% of the patients; of these, 7.6% were anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA+), 26.7% were anti-smooth muscle antibodies (SMA+) and 6.8% were liver kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies (LKM1+). With respect to the thyroid autoantibodies, 7.4% were anti-peroxidase (ATPO+) antibodies, and none were anti-thyroglobulin (ATG+) antibodies. Regarding celiac disease autoantibodies, 5.8% were endomysial antibodies (EMA+), and no transglutaminase (TTG+) antibodies were detected. Cryoglobulins were found in 2.1% of patients. When NOSA+ individuals were compared to patients without the presence of NOSAs, they exhibited higher median alkaline phosphatase (0.7 vs. 0.6 xULN; p=0.041), lower median platelet counts (141,500.0 vs. 180,500.0/mm 3 ; p=0.036), lower mean prothrombin activity (72.6±11.5% vs. 82.2±16.0%; p=0.012) and an increased prevalence of significant fibrosis (E≥2) (45.5% vs. 18.2%; p=0.012). There was also a tendency for a greater proportion of NOSA+ cases to have marked periportal activity (APP≥3) (44.5% vs. 15.6%; p=0.087).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the high prevalence of autoantibodies associated with HCV infection, it was observed that NOSA positivity was associated with a more severe histological and biochemical profile of hepatitis C infection.

Autoantibodies in liver disease: important clues for the diagnosis, disease activity and prognosis

It has been well established that numerous kinds of autoantibodies have been detected in liver disease. Some kinds of autoantibodies may be helpful in the diagnosis of autoimmune liver diseases including autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, these autoantibodies are present even in sera of patients with viral hepatitis, drug-induced hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocelluar carcinoma as well as in sera of patients with autoimmune liver diseases. Other kinds of autoantibodies are recognized as predictive hallmarks for disease activity or prognosis in liver diseases. On the other hand, treatment with interferon initiates the production of several types of autoantibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Some of autoantibodies induced by interferon may postulate the treatment outcome in those patients. Recent studies also revealed the close correlation between oxidative stress and the production of autoantibodies in liver diseases. This article primarily reviews the recent advances of autoantibodies in the liver diseases and discusses the clinical significance of these autoantibodies.

Clinical associations of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 antibodies: Diagnostic utility of their separate detection

Clinical associations of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 antibodies are not yet fully established. In order to analyse the diagnostic utility of their separate detection, we retrospectively revised the clinical data of 200 anti-SSA/Ro60 and/or anti-Ro52/TRIM21 positive patients identified by line immunoassay during ANA routine detection. Anti-SSA/Ro60 positive patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases (AIDs) independently on the presence of anti-Ro52/TRIM21 (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.10-8.88, p = 0.032). Anti-SSA/Ro60 was independently associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) when comparing with Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and other systemic AIDs (OR 3.46, 95% CI 1.08-11.06, p = 0.036). The more frequent specificity found in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) was also anti-SSA/Ro60. In contrast, detection of isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was characteristic of SS (7/35, 20.0%), diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) (3/4, 75.0%), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) (4/5, 80.0%) and, specially, of polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) (6/6, 100%). In fact, anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was the only antibody detected in 4 out of the 6 PM/DM patients. Malignancies mainly account for the observed high prevalence of mono-specific anti-Ro52/TRIM21 in patients with non-AIDs (10/15, 62.5%). In conclusion, this retrospective study supports the routine distinction of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 due to their different clinical associations.

Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a variable clinical phenotype, and the absence of conventional autoantibodies does not preclude its diagnosis or need for treatment. The goals of this review are to describe the frequency and nature of autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis, indicate its outcome after corticosteroid treatment, and increase awareness of the diagnosis in patients with unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis. The frequency of presumed autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis in patients with acute and acute severe presentations is ≤7%, and its frequency in patients with chronic presentations is 1-34%. Patients with acute presentations can have normal serum γ-globulin levels, centrilobular zone 3 necrosis, and low pre-treatment international diagnostic scores. Liver tissue examination is essential for the diagnosis, and hepatic steatosis can be a co-morbid feature. The comprehensive international scoring system can support but never override the clinical diagnosis pre-treatment, and non-standard serological markers should be sought if the clinical diagnosis is uncertain or the diagnostic score is low. A 3-month treatment trial with corticosteroids should be considered in all patients, regardless of the serological findings, and improvements have occurred in 67-87% of cases. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis may be associated with an autoantibody outside the conventional battery; it may have a signature autoantibody that is still undiscovered, or its characteristic autoantibodies may have been suppressed or have a delayed expression. The pathogenic mechanisms are presumed to be identical to those of classical disease. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis is an infrequent but treatable disease that must be considered in unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis.

Performance parameters of the conventional serological markers for autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis is defined by a conventional battery of autoantibodies that may also be present in other liver diseases.

AIMS

To define the performance parameters of the conventional autoantibodies for autoimmune hepatitis, determine the diagnostic implications of simultaneous autoantibody production, and assess the performances of serological assays based on indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay.

METHODS

In this study, 265 adults satisfying codified criteria for autoimmune hepatitis and 342 adults who satisfied conventional diagnostic criteria for another chronic liver disease were each assessed for the conventional autoantibodies.

RESULTS

Antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, and antibodies to liver kidney type 1 had sensitivities of only 32, 16, and 1%, respectively, for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and their diagnostic accuracy ranged from 56 to 61%. The combination of antinuclear antibodies and smooth muscle antibodies at presentation had superior sensitivity (43%), specificity (99%), positive (97%) and negative (69%) predictabilities, and diagnostic accuracy (74%) than each marker alone. The occurrence of multiple autoantibodies was lower in other chronic liver diseases than in autoimmune hepatitis (8% versus 51%, p < 0.000001). The enzyme immunoassay for antinuclear antibodies had an accuracy that was not discriminative for autoimmune hepatitis (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated autoantibodies have a low diagnostic accuracy for autoimmune hepatitis. Concurrent antinuclear antibodies and smooth muscle antibodies have superior performance parameters. The enzyme immunoassay for antinuclear antibodies performs less well than the assay based on indirect immunofluorescence.

Autoantibodies to GW bodies and other autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis

Autoantibodies to intracellular targets in mitochondria and nuclei are serological hallmarks of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). One of the most recently identified cellular targets of PBC autoantibodies is a novel cytoplasmic structure referred to as GW bodies [GWB, G (glycine) W (tryptophan)-containing bodies (GWB)]. GWB are indentified as discrete cytoplasmic domains that are involved in mRNA processing via the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway. Key components of GWB include the proteins GW182, Ago2, RNA-associated protein 55 (RAP55) and Ge-1/Hedls. The primary objective was to study the frequency and clinical association of antibodies directed to GWB components, in 109 PBC patients. Autoantibodies to mitochondrial antigen-pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (M2), branched-chain 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex and 2-oxo glutarate dehydrogenase complex (3E-BPO), gp210, sp100, promyelocytic leukaemia cell antigen (PML) and liver kidney microsomal-1 antigen (LKM-1) were detected by a line immunoassay and antibodies to GWB (GW182, RAP55, Ge-1, GW2, GW3) and glutamate receptor interacting protein (GRIP)-associated protein-1 (GRASP-1), by an addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA). The most common GWB autoantigen targets were: RAP55-28%, GW182-12%, GW2-2% and antibodies to GRASP-1-17%. By comparison, the frequency of reactivity to established PBC autoantigens was: gp210, 27%; sp100, 27% and PML, 17%. None of the autoantibodies were associated with differences in Mayo risk score or liver decompensation. This study is the first study to show that antibodies to RAP55, GW182 and GRASP-1 are the most common GWB targets in PBC.

Autoantibodies as prognostic markers in autoimmune liver disease

Certain autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease have prognostic implications that are under-utilized and under-developed. The goals of this review are to indicate progress in characterizing the autoantibodies with prognostic connotations and to indicate the feasibility and importance of discovering other markers. Prime source and review articles in English were selected by a Medline search through 2010. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen, actin, liver cytosol type 1, asialoglycoprotein receptor, chromatin, cyclic citrullinated peptide, and uridine glucuronosyltransferases have been associated with the occurrence, severity, and progression of autoimmune hepatitis, and antibodies to Sp100, gp210, and centromere have had similar implications in primary biliary cirrhosis. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen have shown the most promise in autoimmune hepatitis as they have been associated with severe histological changes, long durations of treatment, relapse after drug withdrawal, and high frequency of liver failure. Antibodies to the nuclear rim pore protein, gp210, have shown the most promise in primary biliary cirrhosis as they have been associated with severe interface hepatitis, lobular inflammation, and progression to liver failure. The major limitations of the autoantibodies have been their lack of standardized assays, low negative predictabilities, and fluctuating levels. Performance parameters will improve as critical pathogenic pathways, comprehensive testing batteries, and standardized assays through international exchange workshops are developed. Progress has been made in identifying the serological markers of prognosis in autoimmune liver disease, and they promise to reflect critical disease mechanisms and enhance patient management.

Clinical characteristics of patients with autoimmune hepatitis seropositive for anticentromere antibody

AIM

Recent studies have revealed that primary biliary cirrhosis patients with anticentromere antibody (ACA) commonly develop portal hypertension. However, the clinical characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) remain uncertain. We investigated the clinical features of patients with AIH seropositive for ACA (ACA-AIH), comparing them with those of patients with AIH seropositive for other immunofluorescent patterns of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (other-AIH).

METHODS

AIH was diagnosed on the basis of the scoring system proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Seropositivity for ACA was determined by a discrete speckled pattern on HEp-2 cells by an immunofluorescent technique. The severity of histological grading and staging was evaluated by the histological activity index (HAI) score.

RESULTS

Eight (17%) of 47 patients with AIH had ACA. No significant differences in age, sex, onset pattern of the disease, progression to hepatic failure and relapse rate were present between the ACA-AIH and other-AIH groups. The frequency of concurrent autoimmune diseases in ACA-AIH was significantly higher than that in other-AIH (75% vs 36%, P = 0.0406). Biochemical analysis revealed a significantly lower mean immunoglobulin G (IgG) level than that in other-AIH (2176 +/- 641 vs 3013 +/- 923 mg/dL, P = 0.0150). However, there were no differences in serum alanine aminotransferase levels, titers of ANA, HAI scores or the positive rate of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR4 between the groups.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the emergence of ACA is not a distinct entity of AIH, despite its clinical characteristics of a significantly higher frequency of concurrent autoimmune diseases and lower serum IgG levels.

Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the liver, interface hepatitis (based on histologic examination), hypergammaglobulinemia, and production of autoantibodies. Many clinical and basic science studies have provided important insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of AIH. Transgenic mice that express human antigens and develop autoantibodies, liver-infiltrating CD4(+) T cells, liver inflammation, and fibrosis have been developed as models of AIH. AIH has been associated with autoantibodies against members of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes, transfer RNA selenocysteine synthase, formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, and the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases, whereas alleles such as DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are genetic risk factors in white North American and northern European populations. Deficiencies in the number and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) (regulatory) T cells disrupt immune homeostasis and might be corrected as a therapeutic strategy. Treatment can be improved by continuing corticosteroid therapy until normal liver test results and normal liver tissue are within normal limits, instituting ancillary therapies to prevent drug-related side effects, identifying problematic patients early, and providing long-term maintenance therapy after patients experience a first relapse. Calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil are potential salvage therapies, and reagents such as recombinant interleukin-10, abatacept, and CD3-specific antibodies are feasible as therapeutics. Liver transplantation is an effective salvage therapy, even in the elderly, and AIH must be considered in all patients with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Identification of the key defects in immune homeostasis and antigen targets will direct new therapies.

The role of autoantibodies as diagnostic markers of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoantibody testing is the first step towards the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and it is essential in the evaluation of acute and chronic hepatitis of undetermined cause and allograft dysfunction following liver transplantation. A standard diagnostic repertoire has been promulgated, and other autoantibodies are emerging that may have prognostic value. Supplemental autoantibodies may prove useful in assessing patients who lack the standard markers or who are distinctive among those with conventional markers. Serologic testing will improve as assays are standardized by serum exchange workshops, core diagnostic batteries are codified and promulgated, and markers emerge that are tightly associated with pathogenic mechanisms, and closely reflect disease activity and outcome.

Antinuclear antibody positivity in patients with chronic hepatitis C: clinically relevant or an epiphenomenon?

BACKGROUND

Serum autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibody (ANA) are frequently detected in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but its relevance is a matter of discussion.

AIM

To assess the association of ANA positivity with clinical and histological features, and with the outcome of antiviral therapy in patients with HCV infection.

METHODS

Baseline samples from patients with hepatitis C treated with interferon and ribavirin were tested for ANA positivity by indirect immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

The mean age was 48.3+/-11.1 years and 56% were men. Among 234 included patients, 22 patients (9.4%) were positive for ANA. These patients showed significantly higher median alanine aminotransferase level (3.52 vs. 2.39 x upper limit of normal, P=0.009) when compared with ANA-negative patients. Fibrosis stage and necroinflammatory grading were not influenced by ANA positivity. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates were similar between ANA-positive and ANA-negative patients (27 vs. 29%, P=0.882). Alanine aminotransferase flares (> or = 1.5-fold the baseline) during treatment were observed in 28 patients (12%), irrespective of the presence of ANA and without any clinical significance.

CONCLUSION

Among HCV patients, ANA positivity seems to represent an immunological epiphenomenon. It neither influences clinical, biochemical, and histological features of chronic hepatitis C nor predicts response to antiviral treatment.

Clinical characteristics of patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease seropositive for anticentromere antibody

The association between anticentromere antibody (ACA) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains unclear. We subjected eight patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease (CLD) seropositive for ACA to a battery of clinical and laboratory tests. The patient cohort was dominated by females, and four of the eight (50%) patients had a concomitant autoimmune disease. All of the patients had high titers of ACA (>or=1:320). The histological activity index scores in chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) patients with ACA were significantly higher than those in CH-C patients without antinuclear antibody (ANA) (12.8 +/- 1.8 vs. 8.3 +/- 4.5, P = 0.0372). The frequency of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR-8 in patients with HCV-related CLD seropositive for ACA was significantly higher than that in patients with CH-C seronegative for ANA (71 vs. 18%, P = 0.0108). These findings suggest that ACA is induced by chronic HCV infection in association with HLA DR-8, and that CH-C patients with ACA exhibit more severe hepatic fibrosis and inflammation than CH-C patients without ANA.

Interstitial lung disease and Sjögren's syndrome in primary biliary cirrhosis: a causal or casual association?

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been reported in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC); however, its frequency and pathogenesis are still poorly documented. Sjogren's syndrome (SS) is fairly common among patients with PBC, but the relationship between SS and PBC also remains controversial. To determine whether ILD and SS in PBC is a causal or casual association, whether SS accompanying PBC, could be considered secondary to or associated with PBC. One hundred and nine consecutive PBC cases were analyzed, and the differences of clinical features, histological stages, and serum autoantibodies between the PBC patients with and without SS were compared. There were 46 PBC patients with SS and 63 without SS, and 11 patients met the criteria of ILD. SS is associated with PBC in the form of secondary SS. The frequency of ILD in PBC patients with SS was 21.7% while only 1.6% in PBC patients without SS (P<0.0001). ILD in PBC was related to SS, with Spearman's rank coefficient of 0.330 (P=0.000). The association of SS with PBC, significantly higher in patients with than without ILD, which supports the hypothesis that ILD and SS in PBC, may be a causal, not casual, association.

Antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis: a subset of primary biliary cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) are the hallmark in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC); nevertheless, it has long been recognized that 5-10% patients with typical features compatible with PBC do not have detectable AMA, and they were referred to as 'AMA-negative PBC'. This study aimed to evaluate whether AMA-negative/positive PBC represents different clinical entities.

METHODS

We compared the clinical, laboratory, percentage of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in peripheral blood, liver biopsy features and response to treatment of the two groups of patients. The first group was comprised of 12 patients with 'AMA-negative PBC'. The second was made up of another 12 PBC patients with positive AMA.

RESULTS

Antimitochondrial antibodies-negative/positive patients were remarkably similar in terms of clinical manifestations, liver biochemistries and histological findings. The frequency of anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-smooth-muscle antibody, anti-gp210 and anti-sp100 antibody showed no significant difference between the two groups. A significantly lower mean percentage of CD4+CD25(high) T cells was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of AMA-negative/positive PBC patients compared with that of the 12 control subjects (5.8+/-1.8 and 5.4+/-1.4% vs. 7.6+/-1.7% respectively; P=0.014 and 0.004). However, no difference could be found between AMA-negative and AMA-positive PBC patients (P=0.599). After 1 year treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid, the two groups showed similar response.

CONCLUSION

Antimitochondrial antibody-negative/positive PBC patients are similar in clinical, laboratory, percentage of Treg in peripheral blood, liver biopsy features and response to treatment. This suggests that AMA-negative PBC may be a variant of AMA-positive PBC rather than a separate clinical entity.

Antibodies to SS-A/Ro-52kD and centromere in autoimmune liver disease: a clue to diagnosis and prognosis of primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) may be associated with various rheumatological disorders.

AIM

To investigate the frequency and significance of 'rheumatological' antinuclear antibodies in the field of autoimmune chronic liver disease, with special regard to PBC.

METHODS

We studied 105 patients with PBC, 162 autoimmune liver disease controls (type 1 and 2 autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis), 30 systemic lupus erythematosus and 50 blood donors. Sera were tested for the presence of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENA) by counterimmunoelectrophoresis, enzyme-linked and immunoblot (IB) assay, and for the presence of anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) by indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells and IB.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of IB-detected anti-ENA in PBC (30%) was higher than in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis (2.5%, P < 0.0001), type 2 autoimmune hepatitis (0%, P < 0.0001) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (11.5%, P = 0.006) and lower than in systemic lupus erythematosus (53%, P = 0.03). The most frequent anti-ENA reactivity in PBC was anti-SSA/Ro-52kD (28%). ACA were detected by IB in 21% PBC patients and never in the other subjects (P < 0.0001). Anti-SS-A/Ro/52kD positive PBC patients had at the time of diagnosis a more advanced histological stage (P = 0.01) and higher serum levels of bilirubin (P = 0.01) and IgM (P = 0.03) compared with negative ones.

CONCLUSIONS

In the autoimmune liver disease setting, anti-SS-A/Ro-52kD and ACA have a high specificity for PBC and can thus be of diagnostic relevance in anti-mitochondrial antibodies negative cases. If confirmed in further studies with adequate follow-up, anti-SS-A/Ro-52kD antibodies might identify PBC patients with a more advanced and active disease.

Sarcoidosis accompanied by systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune hepatitis

A 52-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for further examination of blurred vision, abnormal lung shadows and an elevated level of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Sarcoidosis was suspected, however, careful history taking revealed the existence of photosensitivity and polyarthralgia. Laboratory tests showed lymphocytopenia, liver dysfunction, hypergammaglobulinemia, and positive anti-nuclear, anti-double stranded DNA and anti-smooth muscle antibodies. Liver biopsy examination showed chronic active hepatitis. She was diagnosed with the triplex of sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune hepatitis. Marked improvement was noted after corticosteroid therapy.

Detection of autoantibodies for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis

AIM: To evaluate the clinical significance of autoantibody detection in the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

METHODS: Indirect immunofluorescence was used to detect the expression of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibody (SMA), antineutropil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), and anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH, n = 47), non-autoimmune hepatitis (n = 158) and healthy controls (n = 40). Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to examine the content of anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibody. The result was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS: Comparison between the rates of ANA, SMA and ANCA showed that SMA was found the highest in AIH patients (66.0%, 31/47), significantly higher than that in non-AIH patients (6.3%, 10/158). After chi-square test, SMA and AMA and MPO were markedly different between AIH and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients (P < 0.01). Finally, ANA, SMA and ANCA were correlated with AIH-Ⅰ, anti-liver/kidney microsomal antibody (LKM) with AIH-Ⅱ, and anti-soluble liver antigen antibody (SLA), ANCA with AIH-Ⅲ.

CONCLUSION: Detection of autoantibodies is helpful in the diagnosis and therapy of AIH.

Autoimmune hepatitis, from mechanisms to therapy

In 1950, Waldenström was the first to describe a chronic form of hepatitis in young women. Subsequently, the disease was found to be associated with other autoimmune syndromes and was later termed "lupoid hepatitis" because of the presence of antinuclear antibodies. In 1965, it became designated by Mackay et al. as "autoimmune hepatitis" at an international meeting, at which the general concept of autoimmunity was endorsed by the scientific community. In the early 1960s and 1970s, the value of immunosuppressive therapy with glucocorticoids and/or azathioprine was well documented in several studies. The original association of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and HLA alleles, which has remarkably stood the test of time, was published in 1972. In the 1970s and 1980s, several autoantibodies were identified in patients with autoimmune hepatitis directed against proteins of the endoplasmatic reticulum expressed in liver and kidney and against soluble liver antigens. Subsequently, the molecular targets of these antibodies were identified and more precisely characterized. In the last two decades many additional pieces of the AIH puzzle have been collected leading to the identification of additional antibodies and genes associated with AIH and to the emergence of new therapeutic agents. Meanwhile, the immunoserological and genetic heterogeneity of AIH is well established and it has become obvious that clinical manifestations, disease behavior, and treatment outcome may vary by racial groups, geographical regions and genetic predisposition. Currently, the International Autoimmune hepatitis group is endorsing multi-center collaborative studies to more precisely define the features at disease presentation and to define prognostic indices and appropriate treatment algorithms. Given the importance of serological testing, the IAHG is also working on guidelines and procedures for more reliable and standardized testing of autoantibodies.

Clinical and serological features of 35 patients with anti-Ki autoantibodies

The objective of this study was to analyse clinical and serological associations of anti-Ki antibodies. Thirty-five patients with anti-Ki antibodies, detected by CIE, selected from laboratory routine, were studied. All patients were affected by autoimmune diseases: SLE and pSS were the most frequent diagnoses. The cohort was constituted by 27 female and eight males. Main clinical features were skin involvement (60%), xerophtalmia (48.6%), Raynaud's phenomenon (43%), photosensitivity (34%), xerostomia (31.4%). CNS involvement was present in four (11.4%) and renal disease in seven cases (20%). ANA, anti-dsDNA and RF were detected in 100%, 60% and 34.5%. In SLE, anti-Ki was detected in 6% of cases, more frequently in males compared to other SLE patients without anti-Ki (P < 0.004). Nineteen anti-Ki positive patients affected by SLE showed more frequently malar rash and multiple autoantibody specificities compared to 16 anti-Ki positive patients with other diseases (P = 0.044 and P = 0.0003, respectively). Our study confirms a preferential occurrence of anti-Ki antibodies in patients with sicca and skin involvement. Malar rash and multiple ANA specificities were significantly associated with SLE compared to other diseases in our study. Anti-Ki were detected in 6% of patients with SLE with a significant prevalence in males.

Autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease

Autoantibodies indicate an immune reactive state, but in liver disease they lack pathogenicity and disease specificity. Antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies constitute the standard serological repertoire that should be assessed in all liver diseases of undetermined cause. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, actin, liver cytosol type 1, nuclear antigens specific to primary biliary cirrhosis, and pore complex antigens constitute an investigational repertoire that promises to have prognostic and diagnostic value. These autoantibodies may emerge as predictors of treatment response and outcome. Antibodies to histones, doubled-stranded DNA, chromatin, and lactoferrin constitute a supplemental repertoire, and they support the immune nature of the liver disease. Final diagnoses and treatment strategies do not depend solely on serological markers. Autoantibodies are floating variables, and their behavior does not correlate closely with disease activity. There are no minimum levels of significant seropositivity, especially in children. Over-interpretation is the major pitfall in the clinical application of the serological results. New autoantibodies will emerge as the search for target antigens and key pathogenic pathways continues.

Autoantibodies against CYP2D6 and other drug-metabolizing enzymes in autoimmune hepatitis type 2

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown etiology, characterized by liver-related autoantibodies. Autoimmune hepatitis is subdivided into two major types: AIH type 1 is characterized by the detection of ANA, SMA, ANCA, anti-ASGP-R, and anti-SLA/LP. Autoimmune hepatitis type 2 is characterized to be mainly related with drug-metabolizing enzymes as autoantigens, such as anti-LKM (liver-kidney microsomal antigen)-1 against CYP2D6, anti-LKM-2 against CYP2C9-tienilic acid, anti-LKM-3 against UGT1A, and anti-LC1 (liver cytosol antigen)-1 and anti-APS (autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type-1) against CYP1A2, CYP2A6, and others. Anti-LKM-1 sera inhibited CYP2D6 activity in vitro but did not inhibit cellular drug metabolism in vivo. CYP2D6 is the major target autoantigen of LKM-1 and expressed on plasma membrane (PM) of hepatocytes, suggesting a pathogenic role for anti-LKM-1 in liver injury as a trigger. Anti-CYP1A2 was observed in dihydralazine-induced hepatitis, and radiolabeled CYP1A2 disappeared from the PM with a half-life of less than 30 min, whereas microsomal CYP1A2 was stably radiolabeled for several hours. Main antigenic epitopes on CYP2D6 are aa 193-212, aa 257-269, and aa 321-351; and D263 is essential. The third epitope is located on the surface of the protein CYP2D6 and displays a hydrophobic patch that is situated between an aromatic residue (W316) and histidine (H326). Some drugs such as anticonvulsants (phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine) and halothane are suggested to induce hepatitis with anti-CYP3A and anti-CYP2E1, respectively. Autoantibodies against CYP11A1, CYP17, and/or CYP21 involved in the synthesis of steroid hormones are also detected in patients with adrenal failure, gonadal failure, and/or Addison disease.

Detection of circulating autoantibodies directed against the asialoglycoprotein receptor using recombinant receptor subunit H1

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The asialoglycoprotein-receptor (ASGPR) is a major liver-specific target autoantigen in autoimmune hepatitis. ASGPR heteromers of two subunits H1 and H2 provide clearance of circulating asialoglycoproteins by receptor-mediated endocytosis. The aim of this study was to establish whether a recombinantly expressed subunit H1 presenting conformational epitopes is capable of detecting autoantibodies against ASGPR in patients with inflammatory liver disease.

METHODS

The major subunit H1 was expressed in human-embryo-kidney 293-cells and prepared by ligand-affinity-chromatography similar to the complete receptor from normal liver. Reactivities of anti-ASGPR positive sera from 219 patients with both recombinant H1 and natural receptor were compared using enzyme-immunoassay (EIA).

RESULTS

194 of 219 sera (88.6%) showed absorbance values on 293-H1 within a range of +/-15% compared to the natural receptor. 145 of 149 sera (97.3%) positive on ASGPR were also positive on recombinant H1. Titers of 61/62 sera (98.4%) revealed no deviation of more than one dilution step. ASGPR reactivity could be inhibited in 29 sera with up to 50 ng/microl of 293-H1.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the antigenic sites of the human ASGPR are mainly located on the mammalian-expressed subunit H1. Therefore, 293-H1 is a powerful tool for the detection of autoantibodies against ASGPR.

[Auto-antibodies to anti-ENA SSA/RO (52 and 60 kDa): an auto-immunity laboratory's experience]

PURPOSE

Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La autoantibodies are frequently encountered in SLE or SGS where anti-SSA subtypes 52 and 60 kDa seems to be differently found in connection with the disease type: anti-SSA/Ro 60 kDa more frequently found in SLE and anti-SSA/Ro 52 kDa in SGS. We try to find if it was interesting in identifying these specificities for all anti-ENA screening.

METHOD

The study included 162 patients' sera found anti-SSA 52 and/or anti-SSA 60 and/or anti-SSB positive among 1600 screening tests from the different hospital's services. We used two assays: first, dotblot (Innolia-Ana Update INGEN) as a screening test and second, an Elisa (ENA-LISA BMD) as confirmation. Thirty-eight control sera were found negative with dotblot.

RESULTS

Only one subtype of anti-SSA (52 or 60 kD) or anti-SSB was found for 55 sera (44 anti-SSA 52, 10 anti-SSA 60, 1 anti-SSB) and 107 sera were found positive for two or more (73 anti-SSA 52 + 60 and 34 anti-SSA 52 or 60 with another anti-ENA). While anti-SSA 60 kDa alone or not was always positive with the Elisa test, neither anti-SSA 52 alone was anti-SSA Elisa's positive. Diseases associations results show a greater linking of anti-SSA 60 kDa with SLE, a frequent linking of combined reactivity anti-SSA 52/60 in SLE and SGS and a greater spreading of anti-SSA 52 kDa alone among pathological groups, showing an autoimmune disease's linking in 68%. Among SGS, 29% had only anti-SSA 52 kDa.

CONCLUSION

We suggest screening specific tests for identifying anti-SSA/Ro 52 kDa reactivity which are missed by routine testing (tests using animal's antigens) and could represent an additional serum marker in Connective Tissue Diseases.

Autoantibodies and autoantigens in autoimmune hepatitis: important tools in clinical practice and to study pathogenesis of the disease

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic necroinflammatory disease of the liver characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, characteristic autoantibodies, association with HLA DR3 or DR4 and a favorable response to immunosuppressive treatment. The etiology is unknown. The detection of non-organ and liver-related autoantibodies remains the hallmark for the diagnosis of the disease in the absence of viral, metabolic, genetic, and toxic etiology of chronic hepatitis or hepatic injury. The current classification of AIH and the several autoantibodies/target-autoantigens found in this disease are reported. Current aspects on the significance of these markers in the differential diagnosis and the study of pathogenesis of AIH are also stated. AIH is subdivided into two major types; AIH type 1 (AIH-1) and type 2 (AIH-2). AIH-1 is characterized by the detection of smooth muscle autoantibodies (SMA) and/or antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Determination of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), antibodies against the asialoglycoprotein receptor (anti-ASGP-R) and antibodies against to soluble liver antigens or liver-pancreas (anti-SLA/LP) may be useful for the identification of patients who are seronegative for ANA/SMA. AIH-2 is characterized by the presence of specific autoantibodies against liver and kidney microsomal antigens (anti-LKM type 1 or infrequently anti-LKM type 3) and/or autoantibodies against liver cytosol 1 antigen (anti-LC1). Anti-LKM-1 and anti-LKM-3 autoantibodies are also detected in some patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and chronic hepatitis D (HDV). Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) has been documented as the major target-autoantigen of anti-LKM-1 autoantibodies in both AIH-2 and HCV infection. Recent convincing data demonstrated the expression of CYP2D6 on the surface of hepatocytes suggesting a pathogenetic role of anti-LKM-1 autoantibodies for the liver damage. Family 1 of UDP-glycuronosyltransferases has been identified as the target-autoantigen of anti-LKM-3. For these reasons the distinction between AIH and chronic viral hepatitis (especially of HCV) is of particular importance. Recently, the molecular target of anti-SLA/LP and anti-LC1 autoantibodies were identified as a 50 kDa UGA-suppressor tRNA-associated protein and a liver specific enzyme, the formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, respectively. Anti-ASGP-R and anti-LC1 autoantibodies appear to correlate closely with disease severity and response to treatment suggesting a pathogenetic role of these autoantibodies for the hepatocellular injury. In general however, autoantibodies should not be used to monitor treatment, predict AIH activity or outcome. Finally, the current aspects on a specific form of AIH that may develop in some patients with a rare genetic syndrome, the autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy syndrome (APECED) are also given. Autoantibodies against liver microsomes (anti-LM) are the specific autoantibodies detected in AIH as a disease component of APECED but also in cases of dihydralazine-induced hepatitis. Cytochrome P450 1A2 has been identified as the target-autoantigen of anti-LM autoantibodies in both APECED-related AIH and dihydralazine-induced hepatitis. The latter may indicate that similar autoimmune pathogenetic mechanisms can lead to liver injury in susceptible individuals irrespective of the primary defect. Characterization of the autoantigen-autoantibody repertoire continues to be an attractive and important tool to get access to the correct diagnosis and to gain insight into the as yet unresolved mystery of how hepatic tolerance is given up and AIH ensues.

Autoantibodies in the diagnosis and management of liver disease

Autoantibodies are nonpathogenic manifestations of immune reactivity, and they may occur in acute and chronic liver diseases. Autoantibodies may be consequences rather than causes of the liver injury, and they should be regarded as diagnostic clues rather than etiologic markers. Conventional autoantibodies used in the categorization of autoimmune liver disease are antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and atypical perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Ancillary autoantibodies that enhance diagnostic specificity, have prognostic connotation, or direct treatment are antibodies to endomysium, tissue transglutaminase, histones, doubled-stranded DNA, and actin. Autoantibodies that have an emerging diagnostic and prognostic significance are antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, liver cytosol type 1, and nuclear pore complex antigens. Autoantibodies of uncertain clinical value that remain under investigation are antibodies to chromatin, lactoferrin, and Saccharomyces cervisiae. Continued recognition and characterization of autoantibodies should improve diagnostic precision, provide prognostic indices, and elucidate target autoantigens. These advances may in turn clarify pathogenic mechanisms, facilitate the development of animal models, and generate novel site-specific therapies.

Transition of care between paediatric and adult gastroenterology. Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic disease of the liver with an excellent prognosis under medical therapy capable of reaching complete remission. The diagnosis of AIH relies on the exclusion of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic aetiologies of chronic hepatitis, or hepatic injury. Autoantibodies contribute to the diagnosis of AIH and have led to the serological subclassification into three distinct types. Also, immunogenetic associations suggest heterogeneity of the syndrome of AIH. Treatment is not based on serological types but is uniformly employed for all subtypes of AIH. Although 90% of patients respond to treatment, immunosuppressive drugs used in transplant medicine have been employed for patients with treatment failure. New drugs, such as budenoside, are being evaluated for the long-term treatment of AIH with a reduction in steroid side-effects. Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for patients who fail to reach remission and progress to cirrhosis and liver failure. In Europe, about 4% of cirrhotic patients with the diagnosis of AIH undergo transplantation. The diagnosis and awareness of the disease is designed to reduce mortality and morbidity.

Gender effects and synergisms with histocompatibility leukocyte antigens in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis

OBJECTIVES

Our goals were to determine the effect of gender on the clinical features and treatment outcome of type 1 autoimmune hepatitis, and to assess synergisms with the known genetic risk factors.

METHODS

Clinical findings and treatment outcomes were compared in 144 women and 41 men who were also assessed for HLA DR3, HLA DR4, HLA DR3 and DR4 alleles, and the DRB1*1501-DQA1*102 haplotype by polymerase chain reaction. A total of 102 healthy men and women were similarly typed.

RESULTS

Women were distinguished from men by higher frequencies of concurrent immune diseases (34% vs 17%, p = 0.05) and HLA DR4 (49% vs 24%, p = 0.007), as had been previously reported. Women, however, had a higher occurrence of non-DRB1*0401 DR4 alleles than men (15% vs 0%, p = 0.02), and men had a lower frequency of these alleles than did normal male subjects (0% vs 16%, p = 0.04). Men and women responded similarly to therapy. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in men only if they had HLA DR3 and women had HLA DR4 (25% vs 4%, p = 0.01). The DRB1*1501-DQA1*102 haplotype did not affect outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender influences susceptibility and clinical manifestations, but not outcome. Women have HLA DR4 more commonly than men, but this difference relates to their higher frequency of non-DRB1*0401 DR4 alleles. Female gender may promote risk associated with different HLA DR4 alleles.