Autoimmune hepatitis and chronic hepatitis C: latent or initiated by interferon therapy?

Immunogenicity and other problems associated with the use of biopharmaceuticals

Biopharmaceuticals are used widely for the treatment of cancer, chronic viral hepatitis, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases. Biopharmaceuticals such as interferons are well tolerated for the most part with the most common adverse events observed being 'flu-like' symptoms that resolve rapidly after initial treatment. Prolonged treatment is associated, however, with more serious adverse events including leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neuropsychiatric effects, which may necessitate dose reduction or even cessation of treatment in some patients. Recombinant growth factors, such as erythropoietin (EPO), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, are for the most part well tolerated, although severe complications have been reported in patients with cancer or chronic kidney disease treated with EPO. Similarly, treatment of patients with cancer with high doses of interleukin-2 is associated with significant toxicity. Treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and Crohn's disease, with antitumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibodies is associated with an increased risk of granulomatous infections and, in particular, tuberculosis. The monoclonal antibody, natalizumab, that targets alpha4 integrins is effective in the treatment of multiple sclerosis but is associated with the activation of JC virus and development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Repeated administration of recombinant proteins can cause a break in immune tolerance in some patients resulting in the production of a polyclonal antibody response that can adversely affect pharmacokinetics and clinical response. In addition, neutralizing antibodies that cross react with nonredundant essential proteins such as EPO can cause severe autoimmune reactions.

Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Interferons

Interferons (IFNs) are class II cytokines that are key components of the innate immune response to virus infection. Three IFN sub-families, type I, II, and III IFNs have been identified in man, Recombinant analogues of type I IFNs, in particular IFNα2 and IFNβ1, have found wide application for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis and remitting relapsing multiple sclerosis respectively. Type II IFN, or IFN gamma, is used principally for the treatment of chronic granulomatous disease, while the recently discovered type III IFNs, also known as IFN lambda or IL-28/29, are currently being evaluated for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis. IFNs are in general well tolerated and the most common adverse events observed with IFNα or IFNβ therapy are “flu-like” symptoms such as fever, headache, chills, and myalgia. Prolonged treatment is associated with more serious adverse events including leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, increased hepatic transaminases, and neuropsychiatric effects. Type I IFNs bind to high-affinity cell surface receptors, composed of two transmembrane polypeptides IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, resulting in activation of the Janus kinases Jak1 and Tyk2, phosphorylation and activation of the latent cytoplasmic signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT1) and STAT2, formation of a transcription complex together with IRF9, and activation of a specific set of genes that encode the effector molecules responsible for mediating the biological activities of type I IFNs. Systemic administration of type I IFN results in activation of IFN receptors present on essentially all types of nucleated cells, including neurons and hematopoietic stem cells, in addition to target cells. This may well explain the wide spectrum of IFN associated toxicities. Recent reports suggest that certain polymorphisms in type I IFN signaling molecules are associated with IFN-induced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic hepatitis C. IFNγ binds to a cell-surface receptor composed of two transmembrane polypeptides IFGR1 and IFGR2 resulting in activation of the Janus kinases Jak1 and Jak2, phosphorylation of STAT1, formation of STAT1 homodimers, and activation of a specific set of genes that encode the effector molecules responsible for mediating its biological activity. In common with type I IFNs, IFNγ receptors are ubiquitous and a number of the genes activated by IFNγ are also activated by type I IFNs that may well account for a spectrum of toxicities similar to that associated with type I IFNs including “flu-like” symptoms, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and increased hepatic transaminases. Although type III IFNs share the major components of the signal transduction pathway and activate a similar set of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) as type I IFNs, distribution of the IFNλ receptor is restricted to certain cell types suggesting that IFNλ therapy may be associated with a reduced spectrum of toxicities relative to type I or type II IFNs. Repeated administration of recombinant IFNs can cause in a break in immune tolerance to self-antigens in some patients resulting in the production of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) to the recombinant protein homologue. Appearance of NABs is associated with reduced pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and a reduced clinical response. The lack of cross-neutralization of IFNβ by anti-IFNα NABs and vice versa, undoubtedly accounts for the apparent lack of toxicity associated with the presence of anti-IFN NABs with the exception of relatively mild infusion/injection reactions.

Type I IFNs and their role in the development of autoimmune diseases

BACKGROUND

Since their initial use in the 1980s, IFNs have become an essential component of the therapy for many diseases such as hepatitis and multiple sclerosis. Although they have been extremely useful in conditions that pose therapeutic challenges, complications associated with their use have been widely reported including emerging reports of several autoimmune diseases. Many of these reports have shed light on the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders and helped to highlight not only the critical role of type I IFNs in defense against viral infections but also the pivotal role they occupy in the interface between innate and adaptive immunity. Many patients with autoimmune disease have increased responsiveness to type I IFNs (alpha/beta), and therapy with these cytokines has induced or unmasked autoimmune disease in many additional patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to discuss the role of type I IFNs in autoimmunity.

METHODS

The literature regarding type I IFNs and autoimmunity was reviewed using the Medline database from 1950 to 2009. Search terms included 'interferon alpha' and 'autoimmune disease' and 'interferon beta' and 'autoimmune disease'. Case reports, case series, reviews and prospective studies were included in the analysis.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

In the literature a variety of autoimmune disorders have reportedly been induced by the use of type I IFNs, being used, although these are primarily in the form of case reports and case series. Nevertheless, there is a growing body of molecular evidence to support the clinical association. The role of IFNs in the induction of autoimmunity is complex with interplay of many genetic and environmental factors that influence the balance between normal and aberrant immune responsiveness, ultimately leading to the observed clinical manifestations.

Adverse effects and other safety aspects of the hepatitis C antivirals

The preferred treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C, either treatment-naive, relapsers or nonresponders to IFN monotherapy, is now IFN-ribavirin combination treatment. The adverse effects of IFN are well established and familiar to hepatologists all over the world. More than 25,000 patients worldwide have been treated with combination therapy. Patients re-treated with a combination regimen are more likely to tolerate IFN better than treatment-naive patients, probably due to better case selection. The safety profile of regimens containing IFN-alpha plus ribavirin is generally consistent with the safety profile of each agent when employed in monotherapy; there is little or no synergistic toxicity. Anorexia, dyspnoea, cough, pruritus and rash are the only adverse events reported at a consistently higher frequency with combination treatment, and are usually mild to moderate in severity and rarely result in dose reductions or discontinuation. The primary cause of dose reduction for combination therapy is haemolytic anaemia, which can be managed effectively. The most common reason for discontinuation of therapy for either type of therapy is psychiatric problems, especially depression, which seems to be closely related to the duration of treatment. In patients receiving combination therapy, anaemia and depression need close monitoring, and dose modification in some cases. Strict guidelines for dose reduction and discontinuation are essential to prevent serious adverse events. Because of the teratogenic risk from ribavirin, pregnancy is contraindicated in patients or their partners during and 6 months after treatment.

Independent expression of serological markers of thyroid autoimmunity and hepatitis virus C infection in the general population: results of a community-based study in north-western Sardinia

To assess the relationship between serological markers of thyroid autoimmunity and chronic hepatitis C, we surveyed the general population of two villages in the region of Sardinia, Italy, where infection with hepatitis viruses is endemic and the prevalence of autoimmune diseases is elevated. A total of 1310 subjects aged 6-88 years (65% of the total resident population) participated in the survey, and 1233 (94%; 444 males and 789 females) agreed to provide a blood sample. Autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) were measured by radioimmunoassay; antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) by a third generation enzyme immunoassay and borderline positive results confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay. For both anti-HCV and anti-TPO the age- and gender-standardized prevalence rates (SPR) were calculated and the significance of the association between the two antibodies tested by Yates corrected chi2 test. The overall SPR for anti-HCV was 50.7x10(-3) (86/1,233), similar between men [49.1x10(-3) (22/444)] and women [52.3x10(-3) (64/789)]. The overall SPR for anti-TPO was 136.9x10(-3) (204/1,233), and that among women [201x10(-3) (174/789)] was almost 3-fold that among men [71.6x10(-3) (30/444)]. A concurrent anti-HCV and anti-TPO positivity was found in a small minority of subjects [8/1,233 (0.65%)], all women aged 57-81 years. The SPR for the two concurrent events was 3.3x10(-3), which was not significantly different (Yates corrected chi2 test = 0.65) from that expected under the assumption of unrelated events. To explore whether HCV infection is a risk factor for anti-TPO positivity, we designed a case-control study with anti-TPO positive subjects as the cases, and anti-TPO negative subjects as the controls. The age- and gender-adjusted odd ratio (OR) was 0.4 (95% CI 0.2,0.7), indicating a negative association. In conclusion, no evidence for epidemiological association of circulating thyroid autoantibodies and antibodies to HCV was found. Our findings do not therefore support a pathogenetic link between HCV infection and thyroid autoimmunity.

Autoimmune events during interferon beta-1b treatment for multiple sclerosis

Autoimmune events, although rarely reported during interferon beta-1b (IFNB) treatment of relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS), may be more frequent than expected due to the many immunologic abnormalities associated with this disease. We report the prospective two-year follow-up of autoimmune events in 40 RR MS patients treated with IFNB and in 21 untreated MS controls. Thyroid and liver function and serum level of 12 autoantibodies (autoAbs) against organ- (thyroid, gastric, pancreatic) and non-organ-specific antigens were serially monitored. In contrast to control patients, autoAbs (anti-nuclear, -smooth muscle or -thyroid antigens) were detected in 13 IFNB-treated patients, and these were associated with thyroid or liver function alteration in many cases. Persistent autoimmune thyroid dysfunction occurred in three IFNB-treated patients, all of whom were women with a familial history of thyroid disease or baseline anti-thyroid autoAb positivity. For improvement of the MS relapse rate, thyroid dysfunction was adequately treated without stopping IFNB. Liver function alteration (17 IFNB-treated patients, associated with non-organ-specific autoAbs in four) was transient and did not require IFNB treatment to be stopped, with the exception of one patient who was already suffering from a drug-induced hepatopathy at baseline. During the IFNB treatment of MS, several autoimmune events may occur, indicating that thyroid and liver function and autoAbs must be carefully monitored.