Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures with Dimon-Hughston osteotomy displacement fixation and acrylic cement

Indications for cement augmentation in fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures: a systematic review of evidence

INTRODUCTION

Achieving durable mechanical stability in geriatric intertrochanteric proximal femur fractures remains a challenge. Concomitant poor bone quality, unstable fracture patterns, and suboptimal reduction are additional risk factors for early mechanical failure. Cement augmentation of the proximal locking screw or blade is one proposed method to augment implant anchorage. The purpose of this review is to describe the biomechanical and clinical evidence for cement augmentation of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures, and to elaborate indications for cement augmentation.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for English language studies up to January 2021. Studies that assessed effect of calcium phosphate or methylmethacrylate cement augmentation during open reduction and internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures were included. Studies with sample size < 5, nontraumatic or periprosthetic fractures, and nonunion or revision surgery were excluded. Study selection adhered to PRISMA criteria.

RESULTS

801 studies were identified, of which 40 met study criteria. 9 studies assessed effect of cement augmentation on fracture displacement. All but one found that cement decreased fracture displacement. 10 studies assessed effect of cement augmentation on total load or cycles to failure. All but one demonstrated that augmented implants increased this variable. Complication rates of cement augmentation during ORIF of intertrochanteric fractures ranged from 0 to 47%, while non-augmented implants ranged from 0 to 51%. Reoperation rates ranged from 0 to 11% in the cement-augmented group and 0 to 11% in the non-augmented group. Fixation failure ranged from 0 to 11% in the cement-augmented group and 0 to 20% in the non-augmented group. Nonunion ranged from 0 to 3.6% in the cement-augmented group and 0 to 34% in the non-augmented group.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium phosphate or PMMA-augmented CMN fixation of IT fractures increased construct stability and improved outcomes in biomechanical and early clinical studies. The findings of these studies suggest an important role for cement augmentation in patient populations at high risk of mechanical failure.

Absorbable and non-absorbable cement augmentation in fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures: systematic review of the literature

We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the use of both resorbable and non-resorbable cement as an adjunct to internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality and extracted relevant data from each included study. In cases in which the outcomes data were similar between studies, data were pooled and analyzed. Seven studies were included after fulfilling all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two hundred and eighty patients were treated with augmentation and 175 were treated without augmentation. Studies were variable in their ability to demonstrate better functional outcomes in patients who underwent augmentation. However, radiographic parameters (mean lag screw sliding distance and varus deformity) were better in the augmentation group. In terms of complications, failure to use augmentation with a sliding hip screw device in five studies led to 10.8-fold higher likelihood of construct failure (p < 0.01). Augmentation of intertrochanteric femur fractures with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium-phosphate may provide benefits in terms of radiographic parameters and complication rates; however, more stringent research methodology is necessary to determine the extent of the benefit.

Fractures of the hip and osteoporosis: the role of bone substitutes

Failure of fixation is a common problem in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures around the hip. The reinforcement of bone stock or of fixation of the implant may be a solution. Our study assesses the existing evidence for the use of bone substitutes in the management of these fractures in osteoporotic patients. Relevant publications were retrieved through Medline research and further scrutinised. Of 411 studies identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 12 experimental and ten clinical reports. The clinical studies were evaluated with regard to their level of evidence. Only four were prospective and randomised. Polymethylmethacrylate and calcium-phosphate cements increased the primary stability of the implant-bone construct in all experimental and clinical studies, although there was considerable variation in the design of the studies. In randomised, controlled studies, augmentation of intracapsular fractures of the neck of the femur with calcium-phosphate cement was associated with poor long-term results. There was a lack of data on the long-term outcome for trochanteric fractures. Because there were only a few, randomised, controlled studies, there is currently poor evidence for the use of bone cement in the treatment of fractures of the hip.

What's new in the management of proximal femoral fractures?

The incidence of proximal femoral fractures has increased significantly in recent years, and is expected to continue to rise with increasing life expectancy. However, the optimal method of treatment of these fractures is still debated. This article summarises current evidence concerning the most controversial issues in the treatment of intracapsular and extracapsular proximal femoral fractures. Despite initial enthusiasm, many new treatment options have been proved inferior to older, traditional methods, and physicians should be cautious when it comes to managing these fractures. It seems that meticulous surgical technique and implant selection according to fracture pattern and the characteristics of the individual patient offer the best route to optimal final outcome.

Mechanical evaluation of a carbonated apatite cement in the fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures

We created three-part unstable intertrochanteric fractures in 6 pairs of aged, osteopenic, human, cadaveric femora. Fractures were reduced and fixed with a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Two test groups were evaluated: 1. Fixation with DHS, and 2. Fixation with a DHS and calcium phosphate bone cement (Norian SRS (Skeletal Repair System)) augmentation of the fracture line and posteromedial calcar region of the proximal femur. Each femur was loaded to 1,650 N (2.5 body weight) for 10,000 cycles to simulate postoperative load transmission across the fracture construct during normal gait. The load was further increased successively by one body weight for another 10,000 cycles until failure. We evaluated fixation by measuring the amount of sliding of the lag screw of the DHS (shortening) and stiffness of the overall fracture construct (stability). SRS cement-augmented specimens had less shortening (1 mm versus 17 mm) and twice the initial construct stiffness compared to control specimens.

Sliding hip screws: modes of failure

The modes of failure of the sliding hip screw devices were investigated by reviewing 223 cases. There were 35 mechanical failures. Two of these occurred when the components separated in highly comminuted fractures. The use of the locking screw is recommended to prevent this. The other 33 occurred when the device had lost its sliding action. The reasons for this included jamming, insufficient slide being available and additional fixation. To reduce the complication rate it is recommended that any additional fixation (such as cerclage wires) should be used with care to ensure that they do not block the barrel. For patients with short femoral necks, a shorter barrelled version of the device should be used as it would have a greater sliding capacity. Guidelines for its use are given.

Long-term results and complications of cement augmentation in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures

Thirty-eight patients with unstable trochanteric fractures of the femur were treated with Dimon-Hughston displacement osteotomy and cement augmentation at the fracture site. Of these patients 76 per cent had excellent and good results after an average follow-up of 3.7 years (range 2-5 years). Late complications occurred in six hips. These included non-union at the trochanteric fracture, protruding pin, partial destruction of the femoral head, subcapital fracture of the femoral neck, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head. All complications occurred late (1 year after surgery) and were related to inappropriate placement and excessive amount of cement, together with inadequate new bone formation. The augmentation of cement provided early stability for early mobilization in these elderly patients. However, when improperly used, late complications can occur.

Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with Sarmiento valgus osteotomy and acrylic cement augmentation

Seventy unstable intertrochanteric fractures (Kyle III) were treated by Sarmiento valgus osteotomy, fixation with a sliding hip-screw and plate, and augmentation of the posteromedial upper femoral defect with acrylic cement. Immediate full weight bearing walking was started after the operation. Forty-two patients were followed up for more than 1 year (average 21.4 months). Excellent or good results were obtained in 71.4 per cent. However, there was mechanical failure in which the hip screw cut out of the femoral head superolaterally in 8.6 per cent. Comparison was made between the results of the present technique and our previously reported technique which consisted of Dimon-Hughston medial displacement osteotomy, fixation with sliding hip screw and acrylic cement augmentation to the upper posteromedial femoral defect. It was found that the result of the latter technique is slightly better, probably because of the more rigid reduction.