Garden grading of intracapsular fractures: meaningful or misleading?

Incomplete Screw Thread Engagement of Proximal Fragment: A Possible Failure Risk After Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures

Background For successful internal fixation for femoral neck fracture, the sliding mechanism of the screw is important because it can induce inter-fragmental compression. The thread should penetrate the fracture line and be located within the proximal fragment. If screw thread engagement is incomplete and a part of the thread remains within the distal fragment, the screw sliding can be disturbed, potentially leading to fixation failure. We hypothesized that screw thread in the fracture is a risk of fixation failure. Methods We studied 133 hips that underwent internal fixation for femoral neck fracture using dual sliding and compression screws (DSCS) with 20 mm threads. The existence of incomplete thread engagement and fixation failure (cut out, perforation, pseudoarthrosis, or femoral neck shortening) were evaluated on anteroposterior hip radiography postoperatively. The distances from the thread end to the fracture line, screw head to the femoral head cortex, and femoral head diameter were measured to analyze their relationships with any incomplete thread engagement and fixation failure. Differences in evaluation data were assessed using Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Forty-six cases had at least one screw with incomplete thread engagement, and the other 87 hips had a complete engagement. The failure rate in the group of hips with incomplete thread engagement was significantly higher (7/46, 15.2%) than that in the group of hips with complete thread engagement (3/87, 3.4%) (P = 0.032). Incomplete thread engagement was found in 59 out of 266 screws (22.2%), and a femoral head ≤ 43.9 mm in diameter was associated with an increased risk of incomplete thread engagement. Most incomplete thread engagement screws (81.4%) had < 5 mm thread length within the distal fragment. Conclusion A partially threaded screw is a significant risk of fixation failure after internal fixation for a femoral neck fracture. The smaller femoral head diameter increases the possibility of incomplete thread engagement. Shortening the thread length by 5 mm may help to avoid incomplete thread engagement.

The Significance of Evaluating the Femoral Head Blood Supply after Femoral Neck Fracture: A New Classification for Femoral Neck Fractures

Objective

To compare a new classification with the Garden classification by exploring their relationships with vascular injury.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 73 patients with subcapital femoral neck fracture from July 2015 to November 2018, including 32 males and 41 females with an average age of 47.2 years. All patients were classified by the Garden classification using anteroposterior X‐ray imaging and by a new classification system based on three‐dimensional CT imaging. The blood supply of the affected femoral head in these patients was evaluated based on DSA images. Correlations between the two classifications and the degree of vascular injury were assessed.

Results

The results of the DSA examination indicated that eight patients had no retinacular vessel injury, 20 patients had one retinacular vessel injury, 35 patients had two retinacular vessel injuries, and 10 patients had three retinacular vessel injuries. The degree of vascular injury was used to match the two fracture classifications. Forty‐nine Garden classifications (Type I‐IV: 8, 12, 23, 6, respectively, 67.12%) and 66 new classifications (Type I‐IV: 8, 20, 32, 6, respectively, 90.41%) corresponded to the degree of vascular injury (p < 0.05). The Garden classification showed moderate reliability, and the new classification showed near perfect agreement (Interobserver agreement of k = 0.564 [0.01] in Garden classification vs. Garden classification k = 0.902 [0.01] for the five observers).

Conclusions

The new classification system can accurately describe the degree of fracture displacement and judge the extent of vascular injury.

Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a considerable challenge and burden to individuals and healthcare systems. The number of hip fractures globally is rising rapidly. The majority of intracapsular hip fractures are treated surgically.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relative effects (benefits and harms) of all surgical treatments used in the management of intracapsular hip fractures in older adults, using a network meta-analysis of randomised trials, and to generate a hierarchy of interventions according to their outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and five other databases in July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, reference lists of retrieved articles and conducted backward-citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing different treatments for fragility intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. We included total hip arthroplasties (THAs), hemiarthroplasties (HAs), internal fixation, and non-operative treatments. We excluded studies of people with hip fracture with specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or resulting from high-energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author completed data extraction which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for three outcomes at different time points: mortality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - both reported within 4 months, at 12 months, and after 24 months of surgery, and unplanned return to theatre (at end of study follow-up). We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) with Stata software, using frequentist methods, and calculated the differences between treatments using risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also performed direct comparisons using the same codes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 119 studies (102 RCTS, 17 quasi-RCTs) with 17,653 participants with 17,669 intracapsular fractures in the review; 83% of fractures were displaced. The mean participant age ranged from 60 to 87 years and 73% were women.  After discussion with clinical experts, we selected 12 nodes that represented the best balance between clinical plausibility and efficiency of the networks: cemented modern unipolar HA, dynamic fixed angle plate, uncemented first-generation bipolar HA, uncemented modern bipolar HA, cemented modern bipolar HA, uncemented first-generation unipolar HA, uncemented modern unipolar HA, THA with single articulation, dual-mobility THA, pins, screws, and non-operative treatment. Seventy-five studies (with 11,855 participants) with data for at least two of these treatments contributed to the NMA. We selected cemented modern unipolar HA as a reference treatment against which other treatments were compared. This was a common treatment in the networks, providing a clinically appropriate comparison. In order to provide a concise summary of the results, we report only network estimates when there was evidence of difference between treatments. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for serious and very serious risks of bias and when estimates included possible transitivity, particularly for internal fixation which included more undisplaced fractures. We also downgraded for incoherence, or inconsistency in indirect estimates, although this affected few estimates. Most estimates included the possibility of benefits and harms, and we downgraded the evidence for these treatments for imprecision.  We found that cemented modern unipolar HA, dynamic fixed angle plate and pins seemed to have the greatest likelihood of reducing mortality at 12 months. Overall, 23.5% of participants who received the reference treatment died within 12 months of surgery. Uncemented modern bipolar HA had higher mortality than the reference treatment (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.85; derived only from indirect evidence; low-certainty evidence), and THA with single articulation also had higher mortality (network estimate RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.32; derived from direct evidence from 2 studies with 225 participants, and indirect evidence; very low-certainty evidence). In the remaining treatments, the certainty of the evidence ranged from low to very low, and we noted no evidence of any differences in mortality at 12 months.  We found that THA (single articulation), cemented modern bipolar HA and uncemented modern bipolar HA seemed to have the greatest likelihood of improving HRQoL at 12 months. This network was comparatively sparse compared to other outcomes and the certainty of the evidence of differences between treatments was very low. We noted no evidence of any differences in HRQoL at 12 months, although estimates were imprecise. We found that arthroplasty treatments seemed to have a greater likelihood of reducing unplanned return to theatre than internal fixation and non-operative treatment. We estimated that 4.3% of participants who received the reference treatment returned to theatre during the study follow-up. Compared to this treatment, we found low-certainty evidence that more participants returned to theatre if they were treated with a dynamic fixed angle plate (network estimate RR 4.63, 95% CI 2.94 to 7.30; from direct evidence from 1 study with 190 participants, and indirect evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence that more participants returned to theatre when treated with pins (RR 4.16, 95% CI 2.53 to 6.84; only from indirect evidence), screws (network estimate RR 5.04, 95% CI 3.25 to 7.82; from direct evidence from 2 studies with 278 participants, and indirect evidence), and non-operative treatment (RR 5.41, 95% CI 1.80 to 16.26; only from indirect evidence). There was very low-certainty evidence of a tendency for an increased risk of unplanned return to theatre for all of the arthroplasty treatments, and in particular for THA, compared with cemented modern unipolar HA, with little evidence to suggest the size of this difference varied strongly between the arthroplasty treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable variability in the ranking of each treatment such that there was no one outstanding, or subset of outstanding, superior treatments. However, cemented modern arthroplasties tended to more often yield better outcomes than alternative treatments and may be a more successful approach than internal fixation. There is no evidence of a difference between THA (single articulation) and cemented modern unipolar HA in the outcomes measured in this review. THA may be an appropriate treatment for a subset of people with intracapsular fracture but we have not explored this further.

Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a huge challenge and burden to individuals and healthcare systems. The number of hip fractures globally is rising rapidly. The majority of hip fractures are treated surgically. This review evaluates evidence for types of arthroplasty: hemiarthroplasties (HAs), which replace part of the hip joint; and total hip arthroplasties (THAs), which replace all of it.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of different designs, articulations, and fixation techniques of arthroplasties for treating hip fractures in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, seven other databases and one trials register in July 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing different arthroplasties for treating fragility intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. We included THAs and HAs inserted with or without cement, and comparisons between different articulations, sizes, and types of prostheses. We excluded studies of people with specific pathologies other than osteoporosis and with hip fractures resulting from high-energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We collected data for seven outcomes: activities of daily living, functional status, health-related quality of life, mobility (all early: within four months of surgery), early mortality and at 12 months after surgery, delirium, and unplanned return to theatre at the end of follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 58 studies (50 RCTs, 8 quasi-RCTs) with 10,654 participants with 10,662 fractures. All studies reported intracapsular fractures, except one study of extracapsular fractures. The mean age of participants in the studies ranged from 63 years to 87 years, and 71% were women. We report here the findings of three comparisons that represent the most substantial body of evidence in the review. Other comparisons were also reported, but with many fewer participants. All studies had unclear risks of bias in at least one domain and were at high risk of detection bias. We downgraded the certainty of many outcomes for imprecision, and for risks of bias where sensitivity analysis indicated that bias sometimes influenced the size or direction of the effect estimate. HA: cemented versus uncemented (17 studies, 3644 participants) There was moderate-certainty evidence of a benefit with cemented HA consistent with clinically small to large differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34; 3 studies, 1122 participants), and reduction in the risk of mortality at 12 months (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96; 15 studies, 3727 participants). We found moderate-certainty evidence of little or no difference in performance of activities of daily living (ADL) (SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.16; 4 studies, 1275 participants), and independent mobility (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.14; 3 studies, 980 participants). We found low-certainty evidence of little or no difference in delirium (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.06; 2 studies, 800 participants), early mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.13; 12 studies, 3136 participants) or unplanned return to theatre (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.10; 6 studies, 2336 participants). For functional status, there was very low-certainty evidence showing no clinically important differences. The risks of most adverse events were similar. However, cemented HAs led to less periprosthetic fractures intraoperatively (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.46; 7 studies, 1669 participants) and postoperatively (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.57; 6 studies, 2819 participants), but had a higher risk of pulmonary embolus (RR 3.56, 95% CI 1.26 to 10.11, 6 studies, 2499 participants). Bipolar HA versus unipolar HA (13 studies, 1499 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between bipolar and unipolar HAs in early mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.64; 4 studies, 573 participants) and 12-month mortality (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.53; 8 studies, 839 participants). We are unsure of the effect for delirium, HRQoL, and unplanned return to theatre, which all indicated little or no difference between articulation, because the certainty of the evidence was very low. No studies reported on early ADL, functional status and mobility. The overall risk of adverse events was similar. The absolute risk of dislocation was low (approximately 1.6%) and there was no evidence of any difference between treatments. THA versus HA (17 studies, 3232 participants) The difference in the risk of mortality at 12 months was consistent with clinically relevant benefits and harms (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.22; 11 studies, 2667 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in unplanned return to theatre, but this effect estimate includes clinically relevant benefits of THA (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.07, favours THA; 10 studies, 2594 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between THA and HA in delirium (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.33; 2 studies, 357 participants), and mobility (MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.96 to 0.16, favours THA; 1 study, 83 participants). We are unsure of the effect for early functional status, ADL, HRQoL, and mortality, which indicated little or no difference between interventions, because the certainty of the evidence was very low.  The overall risks of adverse events were similar. There was an increased risk of dislocation with THA (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.27; 12 studies, 2719 participants) and no evidence of a difference in deep infection.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For people undergoing HA for intracapsular hip fracture, it is likely that a cemented prosthesis will yield an improved global outcome, particularly in terms of HRQoL and mortality. There is no evidence to suggest a bipolar HA is superior to a unipolar prosthesis. Any benefit of THA compared with hemiarthroplasty is likely to be small and not clinically appreciable. We encourage researchers to focus on alternative implants in current clinical practice, such as dual-mobility bearings, for which there is limited available evidence.

Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a huge challenge and burden to patients, healthcare systems and society. The increased proportion of older adults in the world population means that the absolute number of hip fractures is rising rapidly across the globe. The majority of hip fractures are treated surgically. This review evaluates evidence for types of internal fixation implants used in joint-preserving surgery for intracapsular hip fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative effects (benefits and harms) of different implants for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, and National Technical Information Service in July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, reference lists of retrieved articles and conducted backward-citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing implants used for internal fixation of fragility intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in older adults. Types of implants were smooth pins (these include pins with fold-out hooks), screws, or fixed angle plates. We excluded studies in which all or most fractures were caused by specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or were the result of a high energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author extracted data and assessed risk of bias which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for seven outcomes: activities of daily living (ADL), delirium, functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mobility, mortality (reported within four months of surgery as early mortality, and at 12 months since surgery), and unplanned return to theatre for treating a complication resulting directly or indirectly from the primary procedure (such as deep infection or non-union). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for these outcomes using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 38 studies (32 RCTs, six quasi-RCTs) with 8585 participants with 8590 intracapsular fractures. The mean ages of participants in the studies ranged from 60 to 84 years; 73% were women, and 38% of fractures were undisplaced. We report here the findings of the four main comparisons, which were between different categories of implants. We downgraded the certainty of the outcomes for imprecision (when data were available from insufficient numbers of participants or the confidence interval (CI) was wide), study limitations (e.g. high or unclear risks of bias), and inconsistency (when we noted substantial levels of statistical heterogeneity). Smooth pins versus fixed angle plate (four studies, 1313 participants) We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility with no more than one walking stick (1 study, 112 participants), early mortality (1 study, 383 participants), mortality at 12 months (2 studies, 661 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (3 studies, 736 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, or HRQoL. Screws versus fixed angle plates (11 studies, 2471 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no clinically important differences between the two implant types in functional status using WOMAC (MD -3.18, 95% CI -6.35 to -0.01; 2 studies, 498 participants; range of scores from 0 to 96, lower values indicate better function), and HRQoL using EQ-5D (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.06; 2 studies, 521 participants; range -0.654 (worst), 0 (dead), 1 (best)). We also found low-certainty evidence showing little or no difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.26; 11 studies, 2321 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility (1 study, 70 participants), and early mortality (3 studies, 467 participants). No studies reported on ADL or delirium. Screws versus smooth pins (seven studies, 1119 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.35; 6 studies, 1005 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in early mortality (3 studies, 584 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (5 studies, 862 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, HRQoL, or mobility. Screws or smooth pins versus fixed angle plates (15 studies, 3784 participants) In this comparison, we combined data from the first two comparison groups. We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two groups of implants in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI.083 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18; 14 studies, 3057 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two groups of implants in independent mobility (2 studies, 182 participants), and early mortality (4 studies, 850 participants). We found no additional evidence to support the findings for functional status or HRQoL as reported in 'Screws versus fixed angle plates'. No studies reported ADL or delirium.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-certainty evidence that there may be little or no difference between screws and fixed angle plates in functional status, HRQoL, mortality at 12 months, or unplanned return to theatre; and between screws and pins in mortality at 12 months. The limited and very low-certainty evidence for the outcomes for which data were available for the smooth pins versus fixed angle plates comparison, as well as the other outcomes for which data were available for the screws and fixed angle plates, and screws and pins comparisons means we have very little confidence in the estimates of effect for these outcomes. Additional RCTs would increase the certainty of the evidence. We encourage such studies to report outcomes consistent with the core outcome set for hip fracture, including long-term quality of life indicators such as ADL and mobility.

Binary Tönnis classification: simplified modification demonstrates better inter- and intra-observer reliability as well as agreement in surgical management of hip pathology

BACKGROUND

The traditional Tönnis Classification System has inherent drawbacks as it is vulnerable to the subjectivity of a four-grade system. A two-grade classification could potentially be more reliable. The purpose of this study is to (1) compare the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the traditional Tönnis Classification System and a simplified Binary Tönnis Classification System for hip osteoarthritis and to (2) evaluate the clinical applicability of both systems. Our hypothesis is that the proposed Binary Tönnis Classification System will have better reliability and agreement for surgical decision-making.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients were selected to participate in this study. Patients were included in this study if they were between 35 and 60 years old. Patients were excluded if they had prior hip surgeries or conditions. All radiographs were randomized and blinded by a non-observer. Five fellowship-trained hip surgeons from a single center, in a fully crossed design, analyzed and graded all the radiographs utilizing the traditional Tönnis Classification System and the proposed Binary Tönnis Classification System. Intra- and inter-observer reliability values for both the systems were calculated using the Cohen's κ coefficient. A multi-rater κ was calculated using the weighted Fleiss method.

RESULTS

The study sample contained 40 anterosuperior hip radiographs. For the traditional Tönnis Classification System, the weighted κ showed a fair inter-observer reliability (κ = 0.474) and excellent intra-observer reliability (κ mean = 0.866). For the proposed Binary Tönnis Classification System, both inter-observer and intra-observer reliability demonstrated excellent values, (κ = 0.858 and 0.928, respectively). On average, the Binary Tönnis Classification System correctly captured 87% of cases. When the traditional Tönnis Classification System was dichotomized, the capture rate was 84%.

CONCLUSION

A simplified binary Tönnis Classification System demonstrates better reliability and clinical implementation than the traditional Tönnis Classification System.

Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in adults

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To determine the relative effects (benefits and harms) of different implants for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures in adults.

The Targon Femoral Neck hip screw versus cannulated screws for internal fixation of intracapsular fractures of the hip

We compared a new fixation system, the Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) hip screw, with the current standard treatment of cannulated screw fixation. This was a single-centre, participant-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 65 years and over with either a displaced or undisplaced intracapsular fracture of the hip were eligible. The primary outcome was the risk of revision surgery within one year of fixation.

A total of 174 participants were included in the trial. The absolute reduction in risk of revision was of 4.7% (95% CI 14.2 to 22.5) in favour of the TFN hip screw (chi-squared test, p = 0.741), which was less than the pre-specified level of minimum clinically important difference. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcome measures.

We found no evidence of a clinical difference in the risk of revision surgery between the TFN hip screw and cannulated screw fixation for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:652–7.

Low bone mineral density is not related to failure in femoral neck fracture patients treated with internal fixation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Internal fixation (IF) in femoral neck fractures has high reoperation rates and some predictors of failure are known, such as age, quality of reduction, and implant positioning. Finding new predictors of failure is an ongoing process, and in this study we evaluated the importance of low bone mineral density (BMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

140 consecutive patients (105 females, median age 80) treated with IF had a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of the hip performed median 80 days after treatment. The patients' radiographs were evaluated for fracture displacement, implant positioning, and quality of reduction. From a questionnaire completed during admission, 2 variables for comorbidity and walking disability were chosen. Primary outcome was low hip BMD (amount of mineral matter per square centimeter of hip bone) compared to hip failure (resection, arthroplasty, or new hip fracture). A stratified Cox regression model on fracture displacement was applied and adjusted for age, sex, quality of reduction, implant positioning, comorbidity, and walking disability.

RESULTS

49 patients had a T-score below -2.5 (standard deviation from the young normal reference mean) and 70 patients had a failure. The failure rate after 2 years was 22% (95% CI: 12-39) for the undisplaced fractures and 66% (CI: 56-76) for the displaced fractures. Cox regression showed no association between low hip BMD and failure. For the covariates, only implant positioning showed an association with failure.

INTERPRETATION

We found no statistically significant association between low hip BMD and fixation failure in femoral neck fracture patients treated with IF.

Treatment and displacement affect the reoperation rate for femoral neck fracture

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) comprise 50% of geriatric hip fractures. Appropriate management requires surgeons to balance potential risks and associated healthcare costs with surgical treatment. Treatment complications can lead to reoperation resulting in increased patient risks and costs. Understanding etiologies of treatment failure and the population at risk may decrease reoperation rates.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore (1) determined if treatment modality and/or displacement affected reoperation rates after FNF; and (2) identified factors associated with increased reoperation and timing and reasons for reoperation.

METHODS

We reviewed 1411 records of patients older than 60 years treated for FNF with internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty between 1998 and 2009. We extracted patient age, sex, fracture classification, treatment modality and date, occurrence of and reasons for reoperation, comorbid conditions at the time of each surgery, and dates of death or last contact. Minimum followup was 12 months (median, 45 months; range, 12-157 months).

RESULTS

Internal fixation (hazard ratio [HR], 6.38) and displacement (HR, 2.92) were independently associated with increased reoperation rates. The reoperation rate for nondisplaced fractures treated with fixation was 15% and for displaced fractures 38% after fixation and 7% after hemiarthroplasty. Most fractures treated with fixation underwent reoperation within 1 year primarily for nonunion. Most fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty underwent reoperation within 3 months, primarily for infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, hemiarthroplasty resulted in fewer reoperations versus internal fixation and displaced fractures underwent reoperation more than nondisplaced. Our data suggest there are fewer reoperations when treating elderly patients with displaced FNFs with hemiarthroplasty than with internal fixation.

Platelet-rich therapy in the treatment of patients with hip fractures: a single centre, parallel group, participant-blinded, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To quantify and draw inferences on the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich therapy in the management of patients with a typical osteoporotic fracture of the hip.

DESIGN

Single centre, parallel group, participant-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

UK Major Trauma Centre.

PARTICIPANTS

200 of 315 eligible patients aged 65 years and over with any type of intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. Patients were excluded if their fracture precluded internal fixation.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants underwent internal fixation of the fracture with cannulated screws and were randomly allocated to receive an injection of platelet-rich plasma into the fracture site or not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Failure of fixation within 12 months, defined as any revision surgery.

RESULTS

Primary outcome data were available for 82 of 101 and 78 of 99 participants allocated to test and control groups, respectively; the remainder died prior to final follow-up. There was an absolute risk reduction of 5.6% (95% CI -10.6% to 21.8%) favouring treatment with platelet-rich therapy (χ(2) test, p=0.569). An adjusted effect estimate from a logistic regression model was similar (OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.40, z test; p=0.325). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcome measures excepting length of stay favouring treatment with platelet-rich therapy (median difference 8 days, Mann-Whitney U test; p=0.03). The number and distribution of adverse events were similar. Estimated cumulative incidence functions for the competing events of death and revision demonstrated no evidence of a significant treatment effect (HR 0.895, 95% CI 0.533 to 1.504; p=0.680 in favour of platelet-rich therapy).

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence of a difference in the risk of revision surgery within 1 year in participants treated with platelet-rich therapy compared with those not treated. However, we cannot definitively exclude a clinically meaningful difference.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN49197425, http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN49197425.

Failed internal fixation of femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

There are two types of surgical treatment for fractures of the femoral neck; internal fixation and arthroplasty. Internal fixation is associated with a higher risk of complications such as secondary displacement, non-union and avascular necrosis. To improve treatment results of internal fixation, we have tried to identify procedure related risk-factors associated with fixation failure.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective study was conducted based on the medical records and X-ray images of 337 patients sustaining intracapsular fractures of the hip during the period 1999-2000. The patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation at Oslo University Hospital, Aker. The reduction of the fracture and the placement of the fixation implants were evaluated and scored (six points representing best achievable result).

RESULTS

Fixation failed in 23 (18,3 %) out of 126 patients with displaced fractures awarded six points for the reduction. In contrast, fixation failed in five (50 %) out of ten patients given a score of three points or less (p &equals; 0.017). The risk of non-union increased when patients were treated more than 48 hours after the initial injury. In this group, 5 (25 %) out of 20 patients developed non-union compared to 16 (8 %) out of 200 patients treated within 48 hours (p &equals; 0.014).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings emphasize the importance of achieving anatomical reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures, and to perform surgery within 48 hours unless an acute medical condition needs to be stabilized.

The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation - an abridged protocol for the WHiTE Study: A multiple embedded randomised controlled trial cohort study

Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. The National Hip Fracture Audit currently provides a framework for service evaluation. This evaluation is based upon the assessment of process rather than assessment of patient-centred outcome and therefore it fails to provide meaningful data regarding the clinical effectiveness of treatments. This study aims to capture data from the cohort of patients who present with a fracture of the proximal femur at a single United Kingdom Major Trauma Centre. Patient-centred outcomes will be recorded and provide a baseline cohort within which to test the clinical effectiveness of experimental interventions.

The reliability of a simplified Garden classification for intracapsular hip fractures

BACKGROUND

The Garden classification is used to classify intracapsular proximal femur fractures. The reliability of this classification is poor and several authors advise a simplified classification of intracapsular hip fractures into non-displaced and displaced fractures. However, this proposed simplified classification has never been tested for its reliability.

HYPOTHESIS

We estimate simplifying the classification of femoral neck fractures will lead to a higher inter-observer agreement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten observers, trauma surgeons and residents, from two different institutes classified 100 intracapsular femoral neck fractures. The inter-observer agreements were calculated using the multi-rater Fleiss' kappa.

RESULTS

The inter-observer kappa for the Garden classification was 0.31. An agreement of κ0.52 was observed if the Garden classification was simplified and the fractures were classified by our observers as 'non-displaced' or 'displaced'. No difference in reliability was seen for the use of the four-grade Garden classification as well as the simplified classification between trauma surgeons and residents.

DISCUSSION

Classification of intracapsular hip fractures according to the four-grade Garden classification is unreliable. The reliability of classification improves when the Garden classification is simplified in a classification using the terms: 'non-displaced' or 'displaced'.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Diagnostic retrospective study.

Radiological predictive factors in the healing of displaced intracapsular hip fractures. A clinical study of 404 cases

BACKGROUND

Fracture healing complications occur in approximately a third of displaced intracapsular hip fractures treated by reduction and internal fixation. Various radiographic features of the fracture have been used to estimate the risk of fracture healing complications.

AIMS

To determine which radiographic features of a displaced intracapsular hip fracture were the most reliable in predicting fracture re-displacement after internal fixation.

METHODS

The pre-operative radiographs for 404 patients with a displaced intracapsular hip fracture treated by reduction and internal fixation were classified using five different variables. These were a direct measurement of trochanteric shortening and fracture shortening, a ratio of fracture displacement, the Garden grade and an alternative interpretation of the Garden grading. Inter-observer reliability of the various classifications was also studied. These observations were related to the later occurrence of fracture displacement or non-union.

RESULTS

Only trochanteric shortening had an acceptable degree of inter-observer variation and this was also the most predictive of fracture re-displacement. The ratio method and fracture shortening were also related to fracture healing complications. Using the traditional Garden grading equal numbers of grade III and IV fractures healed but an alternative interpretation of the Garden grading showed some relationship to the development of non-union.

CONCLUSIONS

A direct measurement of shortening of the femur is the most reliable predictor of failure of the fracture to heal.

The Pauwels classification for intracapsular hip fractures: is it reliable?

The Pauwels classification for the femoral neck fracture is still broadly used in literature and clinical practise. However, this classification has never been tested for its reliability in terms of inter-observer agreement. We assessed whether or not it is reliable to use the Pauwels classification in pre-operative planning. Ten observers classified 100 intra-capsular femur fractures. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the multi-rater Fleiss' kappa. The Pauwels classification showed an inter-observer agreement of κ0.31 (0.01). Classification of intra-capsular hip fractures according to the Pauwels classification using the Pauwels angle is unreliable and its use should be avoided.

Warwick Hip Trauma Study: a randomised clinical trial comparing interventions to improve outcomes in internally fixed intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. Protocol for the WHiT Study

Background

Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment for patients with displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. The recognised treatment alternatives are arthroplasty and internal fixation. The principal criticism of internal fixation is the high rate of non-union; up to 30% of patients will have a failure of the fixation leading to revision surgery. We believe that improved fracture healing may lead to a decreased rate of failure of fixation. We therefore propose to investigate strategies to both accelerate fracture healing and improve fixation that may significantly improve outcomes after internal fixation of intracapsular femoral fractures. We aim to test the clinical effectiveness of the osteoinductive agent platelet rich plasma and conduct a pilot study of a novel fixed-angle fixation system.

Design

We have planned a three arm, single centre, standard-of-care controlled, double blinded, pragmatic, randomised clinical trial. The trial will include a standard two-way comparison between platelet-rich plasma and standard-of-care fixation versus standard-of-care fixation alone. In addition there will be a subsidiary pilot arm testing a fixed-angle screw and plate fixation system.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN49197425

Challenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the nonelderly adult

Femoral neck fractures in young patients are a relatively rare event and are often the consequence of a high-energy injury. Concomitant injuries are present more than 50% of the time. Previous reports have found the rate of nonunion and avascular necrosis in this population to be as high as 35% and 45%, respectively. The salvage options, which tend to yield more acceptable results in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, yield disproportionately poor results in young, active patients who are often productive members of the labor force. Many reports exist in the literature evaluating the various treatment options of these injuries. This review will address the epidemiology and diagnosis of the injury. In addition, the various treatment options in the acute presentation, as well as options available for treating the sequelae of femoral neck fractures in the young, will be discussed. Although longer life expectancy and the sustained activity level of many people previously considered elderly has blurred the definition of "young," this review will use the available literature dealing with skeletally mature patients up to the age of 60 years.

To study the role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the femoral head vascularity in intracapsular femoral neck fractures

Intracapsular femoral neck fractures remain unsolved fractures even after improvement in techniques of diagnosis and internal fixation. Individuals who sustain displaced femoral neck fractures are at high risk of developing avascular necrosis and non-union. Although several methods for predicting the viability of femoral head have been reported, they are not effective or widely used because of unreliability, potential complications and technical difficulties. Dynamic MRI was introduced in the recent past as a simple, non-invasive technique to predict the femoral head viability after the femoral neck fractures. In this study role of dynamic MRI was studied in 30 patients with 31 intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Fractures were divided in to three types according to dynamic curve patterns on MRI evaluation and were followed up for 6 months to 2 years to observe the final outcome. Sensitivity, Specificity and the Accuracy of dynamic MRI in predicting vascularity after femoral neck fracture are 87%, 88% and 87%, respectively. Type A or Type B curve pattern is a positive factor to successful osteosynthesis with p value <0.0001 (Chi-square test). This is a statistically significant value. From this finding it can be suggested that the reliability of dynamic curves A and B in predicting maintained vascularity of femoral head is high. This investigation can be used to predict the vascularity of femoral head after intracapsular femoral neck fractures. There was a good correlation between the outcomes of fractures and dynamic MRI curves done within 48 h of injury. This signifies the role of dynamic MRI in predicting the vascularity of femoral head as early as 48 h. A treatment algorithm can be suggested on the basis of dynamic MRI curves. The fractures with Type C dynamic curve should be considered as fractures with poor vascularity of femoral head and measures to enhance the vascularity of femoral head along with rigid internal fixation should be undertaken to promote revascularization process and better healing of fractures. Patients with these fractures should be on longer non-weight bearing ambulation than other patients. To conclude, the dynamic MRI seems to be reliable, non-invasive, sensitive, specific and accurate method of assessing the femoral head vascularity after intracapsular femoral neck fractures as early as 48 h of injury and to predict the outcome of fractures and may be used as a guideline for management of intracapsular femoral neck fractures.

Perception of Garden's classification for femoral neck fractures: an international survey of 298 orthopaedic trauma surgeons

The Garden classification is the most popular femoral neck fracture classification system. We surveyed orthopaedic surgeons about their preferences for femoral neck fracture classification systems and their belief about their ability to discriminate between the four different Garden fracture types. A questionnaire was developed to examine surgeons' training and experience and their preferences for classification of femoral neck fractures by consulting five orthopaedic surgeons in Canada and the United States, and the previous literature. The Garden classification was the preferred femoral neck fracture classification for 72% of all the surveyed surgeons (n=298). Only 39% of all the surveyed surgeons believed they were able to distinguish all four Garden fracture types. However, 96% of the surgeons felt they could differentiate between undisplaced (Garden I/II) and displaced (Garden III/IV) fractures. High variability in the surgeons' perceptions of the Garden classification system provides a rationale for discontinuing the use of this system in daily practice.

The impact of the garden classification on proposed operative treatment

The current study evaluates the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Garden classification of femoral neck fractures, assesses the influence of a lateral radiograph on a fracture's classification, and determines the classification's impact on the surgeon's choice of operative treatment. Forty radiographs of femoral neck fractures were evaluated independently by five orthopaedic surgeons. Kappa values were calculated for interobserver reliability and intraobserver variability with respect to the readers' ability to assess the fractures using the Garden classification and to determine fracture displacement with and without access to a lateral radiograph. In 69% of the instances in which a reader changed the classification of a fracture, the proposed treatment of the fracture did not change. The Garden classification has poor interobserver reliability but good intraobserver reproducibility. The addition of a lateral radiograph does not seem to improve the reliability of the current Garden classification system but may improve the reader's ability to determine fracture displacement. To improve the reliability and usefulness of the Garden classification, the authors suggest that the classification should be modified to have only two stages (Garden A-nondisplaced or valgus impacted and Garden B-displaced) and to include the use of a lateral radiograph.

Introduction of intracapsular hip fractures: anatomy and pathologic features

The morbidity, mortality, and financial burden related to intracapsular hip fractures in elderly patients in the United States will continue to increase as the population ages. An appreciation of the anatomy and pathologic features of intracapsular hip fractures is necessary for successful treatment.

Classification and diagnosis of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur

Intracapsular fractures of the hip have been classified by different authors with a basis on various concepts. Pauwels classified these fractures according to the angle of inclination; Linton used trabecular disposition among the fractural fragments, and Garden described four types according to the order of displacement. The AO group used the comprehensive classification of fractures of the long bones and divided them among types, groups, and subgroups. However, the presence of posterior comminution of the femoral neck in intracapsular fractures as a factor foretelling instability was overlooked by each of the aforementioned classifications. With a basis on the factors previously described, the current authors developed a classification in which the criteria of instability in intracapsular fractures are given priority. Consequently, the characteristics of full or partial lines, angulation, displacement, and the presence of posterior comminution have been considered. Radiology is the first complementary study for diagnosis; it enables observation of the fracture line or trabecular changes in most cases and fragmental displacement and posterior comminution of the neck. In patients with stress fractures, radiographs often fail to show alterations, so a different diagnostic methodology is required. A diagnosis algorithm is presented. Differential diagnoses are focused toward diseases that may reveal images of pseudofractures.

Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients

208 patients aged over 70 years with a displaced cervical hip fracture were admitted to a prospective randomised trial of internal fixation using 3 parallel cannulated screws or an uncemented Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty. All surviving patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years. Functional assessment of survivors at 1, 2 and 3 years from injury showed no significant difference between groups. Patients treated by the fixation had a marginally lower mortality rate. Other outcomes which favoured internal fixation were a lower risk of wound infection, reduced length of surgery (22 minutes versus 47 minutes), lower operative blood loss (23 mL versus 172 mL), and lower transfusion requirements (4/102 patients versus 18/106). However, internal fixation had a significantly greater re-admission rate (24/102 versus 7/106) and re-operation rate. Following internal fixation, 44 re-operations were required in 36 patients, while re-operation was required in only 4 patients treated with arthroplasty. The results of this randomised trial indicate that both procedures produce comparable final functional outcomes for the survivors.

Fractured neck of femur - solving the unsolved fracture

The choice of treatment for an intracapsular fracture can only be made on an individual patient basis. Factors that influence this decision are the facilities available, surgical expertise, degree of displacement of the fracture, delay from fracture to surgery and age of the patient. In addition, the presence of other medical conditions that may influence fracture healing or adversely affect arthroplasty need to be considered. The clinician when faced with a patient with an intracapsular fracture must assess each patient's individual risk factors, and then decide if the risk of failure of internal fixation of the fracture is high enough to justify replacing the femoral head with an arthroplasty.

Predictors of early failure of fixation in the treatment of displaced subcapital hip fractures

OBJECTIVE

To examine predictors of fixation failure in the treatment of displaced subcapital hip fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

All patients aged sixty-five years and older discharged from a large teaching hospital after treatment for displaced subcapital fracture between April 1, 1989 and February 29, 1995 were identified (n = 344). Of these, 108 patients treated with internal fixation became the study group. Clinical information included demographics, implant, comorbidity, complications, mortality, surgeon' s assessment of reduction, and need for revision. Preoperative x-ray information: Garden grade, Singh Index, Pauwel's angle, medial neck and femoral shaft cortex width, and displacement of fracture fragments. Postoperative: Quality of reduction, a visible gap or step, evidence of union, fracture collapse, and failure.

RESULTS

The failure rate was 31 percent. The two most important predictors were varus reduction and perceived difficulty in achieving reduction. If the patient had a varus reduction or the surgeon had difficulty achieving a satisfactory reduction, fixation was 4.3 times more likely to fail (p = 0.007). If the patient had a varus reduction and reduction was difficult, fixation was 13.6 times more likely to fail (p = 0.04). Under this latter scenario, 75 percent of the fixations failed.

CONCLUSION

In a fracture of the neck of the femur, if difficulty is encountered in obtaining a closed reduction or there is residual varus angulation, the chance of subsequent fixation failure is high. Hemiarthroplasty may be considered in these cases.

Prediction of fracture union after internal fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fractures

This study was based on a series of 470 patients with an intracapsular proximal femoral fracture treated by internal fixation; the characteristics of those patients with non-union were contrasted with those of patients in which union occurred, to determine which variables would predict bony union of the fracture. Radiological factors studied included measurements of fracture displacement, anatomical site and degree of osteoporosis. Patient characteristics studied were age, sex, prefracture mobility and mental state. Patient age and pre-operative fracture displacement were found to be of the greatest value in predicting non-union.