Serum ovarian steroids, prolactin and prostaglandin metabolites in women using the inert intrauterine device

Intrauterine devices and endometrial cancer risk: a pooled analysis of the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium

Intrauterine devices (IUDs), long-acting and reversible contraceptives, induce a number of immunological and biochemical changes in the uterine environment that could affect endometrial cancer (EC) risk. We addressed this relationship through a pooled analysis of data collected in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. We combined individual-level data from 4 cohort and 14 case-control studies, in total 8,801 EC cases and 15,357 controls. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated pooled odds ratios (pooled-ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EC risk associated with ever use, type of device, ages at first and last use, duration of use and time since last use, stratified by study and adjusted for confounders. Ever use of IUDs was inversely related to EC risk (pooled-OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.74-0.90). Compared with never use, reduced risk of EC was observed for inert IUDs (pooled-OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58-0.82), older age at first use (≥ 35 years pooled-OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.67), older age at last use (≥ 45 years pooled-OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.50-0.72), longer duration of use (≥ 10 years pooled-OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.52-0.71) and recent use (within 1 year of study entry pooled-OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.30-0.49). Future studies are needed to assess the respective roles of detection biases and biologic effects related to foreign body responses in the endometrium, heavier bleeding (and increased clearance of carcinogenic cells) and localized hormonal changes.

Basal and metoclopramide-stimulated prolactin (PRL) serum levels in users and non-users of a copper intrauterine device (TCu-380 IUD)

The study was undertaken to analyze the basal and metoclopramide-stimulated serum PRL levels in healthy parous women users (group 1, n = 12) and non-users (group 2, n = 12) of a TCu-380 IUD. All women had regular menses and were studied between days 18 to 22 of their cycle; none had lactated nor regularly ingested any type of medication during the last six months. After a 10-12 hour overnight fast, peripheral venous blood samples were obtained through an indwelling catheter at -30, -15 and 0 minutes and at 60, 90 and 120 minutes after oral metoclopramide (10 mg). There were no significant differences in serum PRL between both groups, in basal levels nor throughout the test, whether analyzing the mean values at each sampling time, the sum of PRL levels from 60-120 minutes, or the peak levels. No correlation was observed between PRL levels and any of the clinical or obstetric characteristics of the women in both groups. Serum progesterone was greater than or equal to 4.0 ng/ml in all women. Thus, the use of alpha TCu-380 IUD did not induce any significant changes in basal nor in stimulated serum PRL levels.