Plasma Lp(a), apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and acute myocardial infarction in men and women: a case-control study in the Jerusalem population

Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology

Human epidemiologic and genetic evidence using the Mendelian randomization approach in large-scale studies now strongly supports that elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease, that is, for myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis. The Mendelian randomization approach used to infer causality is generally not affected by confounding and reverse causation, the major problems of observational epidemiology. This approach is particularly valuable to study causality of Lp(a), as single genetic variants exist that explain 27-28% of all variation in plasma Lp(a). The most important genetic variant likely is the kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) copy number variant, as the apo(a) product of this variant influences fibrinolysis and thereby thrombosis, as opposed to the Lp(a) particle per se. We speculate that the physiological role of KIV-2 in Lp(a) could be through wound healing during childbirth, infections, and injury, a role that, in addition, could lead to more blood clots promoting stenosis of arteries and the aortic valve, and myocardial infarction. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of Lp(a) reduction in individuals with very high concentrations to reduce cardiovascular disease are awaited. Recent genetic evidence documents elevated Lp(a) as a cause of myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis.

Lipoprotein(a) and ischemic heart disease--a causal association? A review

The aim of this review is to summarize present evidence of a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Evidence for causality includes reproducible associations of a proposed risk factor with risk of disease in epidemiological studies, evidence from in vitro and animal studies in support of pathophysiological effects of the risk factor, and preferably evidence from randomized clinical trials documenting reduced morbidity in response to interventions targeting the risk factor. Elevated and in particular extreme lipoprotein(a) levels have in prospective studies repeatedly been associated with increased risk of IHD, although results from early studies are inconsistent. Data from in vitro and animal studies implicate lipoprotein(a), consisting of a low density lipoprotein particle covalently bound to the plasminogen-like glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a), in both atherosclerosis and thrombosis, including accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic plaques and attenuation of t-PA mediated plasminogen activation. No randomized clinical trial of the effect of lowering lipoprotein(a) levels on IHD prevention has ever been conducted. Lacking evidence from randomized clinical trials, genetic studies, such as Mendelian randomization studies, can also support claims of causality. Levels of lipoprotein(a) are primarily determined by variation in the LPA gene coding for the apolipoprotein(a) moiety of lipoprotein(a), and genetic epidemiologic studies have documented association of LPA copy number variants, influencing levels of lipoprotein(a), with risk of IHD. In conclusion, results from epidemiologic, in vitro, animal, and genetic epidemiologic studies support a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of IHD, while results from randomized clinical trials are presently lacking.

Evolution of serum lipids and lipoprotein (a) levels in epileptic children treated with carbamazepine, valproic acid, and phenobarbital

The concentration levels of serum lipids and lipoprotein (a) were measured in 20 children receiving carbamazepine, 25 children receiving valproic acid, and 5 children receiving phenobarbital at the following times: (1) during chronic treatment while eating a normal diet, (2) during chronic treatment while eating a low-fat diet (children treated with carbamazepine and phenobarbital with high levels of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and (3) 3 months after the end of treatment with antiepileptic drugs. Patients during chronic treatment and eating a normal diet revealed significant changes in lipids, but when we reevaluated the groups of children treated with carbamazepine and phenobarbital when they were eating a low-fat diet and reevaluated the three groups of children 3 months after the end of treatment, a complete return to normal of all parameters was observed. These data demonstrate that the changes induced by these drugs are transient, reversible, and influenced by a low-fat diet. (J Child Neurol 2006;21:48-53).

Effect of antiepileptic drugs on plasma lipids, lipoprotein (a), and liver enzymes

We conducted a study to assess the effect of phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and valproate on serum lipid profiles and lipoprotein (a) in 64 children with epilepsy (aged between 1 and 15 years) admitted to the child neurology outpatient clinic between July 2000 and July 2002. The children were separated as group 1 (18 children), treated with phenobarbital, 5 mg/kg/day; group 2 (22 children), treated with carbamazepine, 10 to 15 mg/kg/day; and group 3 (24 children), treated with sodium valproate, 20 mg/kg/day. Plasma lipoprotein (a), total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A and apolipoprotein B levels, and liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase were determined before the initiation of the treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months of the treatment period. The mean age of children in group 1 was significantly low compared with those in groups 2 and 3 (P <.05). The mean pretreatment lipid levels among the groups were not significantly increased. The mean lipoprotein (a) levels were significantly increased in all groups at 3, 6, and 12 months of the treatment period (P <.05). The increase in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 3, 6, and 12 months was statistically significant in group 1 (P <.05). The higher levels in lipoprotein (a) (mean > 30 mg/dL) were observed only in carbamazepine-treated patients at 6 and 12 months. The percentage of children with lipoprotein (a) levels over 30 mg/dL was 44%, 63%, and 33% in the phenobarbital-, carbamazepine-, and valproate-treated children, respectively. Antiepileptic drugs significantly increase the level of lipoprotein (a), which is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis, and also have variable effects on other lipid parameters. Lipoprotein (a) levels should be closely followed in patients receiving antiepileptic drugs. (J Child Neurol 2006;21:70-74).

In vitro inhibition of fibrinolysis by apolipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein(a) is size- and concentration-dependent

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is considered an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic heart and circulatory diseases. The unique, polymorphic character of Lp(a) is based on its apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), which has remarkable structural analogies with plasminogen, an important protein for fibrinolysis. The formation of plasmin from plasminogen is a fundamental step in the dissolution of fibrin. Repression of this step may lead to a deceleration of fibrinolysis. It has been suggested that Lp(a) has antifibrinolytic properties through apo(a) and that the apo(a)-size polymorphism has a distinct influence on the prothrombotic properties of Lp(a). However, the results on this topic are controversial. Therefore we used a standardized in vitro fibrinolysis model to provide further information on the influence of Lp(a) on plasmin formation. Monitoring the time-course of plasmin formation, we investigated the inhibition of plasmin formation through dependence on Lp(a), respectively, free apo(a) concentration. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of three Lp(a)/apo(a) phenotypes ((22K)Lp(a), 22 kringle-4 repeats; (30K)Lp(a), 30 kringle-4 repeats; (35K)Lp(a), 35 kringle-4 repeats). Adding varying amounts of Lp(a) to our model, we observed that the rate of plasmin formation was inversely related to the Lp(a) concentration. At 0.1 micromol/l (30K)Lp(a), for example, the plasmin formation was reduced by 12.7% and decreased further by 40.7% at 0.25 micromol/l Lp(a). A similar but more distinct effect was observed when free (30K)apo(a) was added to the model (25.3% at 0.1 micromol/l vs. 59.3% at 0.25 micromol/l). Comparing the antifibrinolytic influence of different apo(a) phenotypes we found that the reduction of plasmin generation advanced with the size of apo(a). At 0.1 micromol/l Lp(a) the reduction of the plasmin formation increased in the order (22K)Lp(a), (30K)Lp(a) and (35K)Lp(a) from 3.7% to 10.7% and 22.3%, respectively. Experiments with different phenotypes of free apo(a) showed similar results (0.5 micromol/l: (22K)apo(a), 56.4% vs. (30K)Lp(a), 80.4%). Summarizing these results, our study indicates a distinct interrelation of Lp(a)/apo(a) phenotype and concentration with the formation of plasmin. From the antifibrinolytic Lp(a)/apo(a) effect in vitro it may be hypothesized that Lp(a)/apo(a) also has an inhibitory influence on in vivo fibrinolysis.

Apolipoprotein(a) isoforms in infarcted men under 60 years old

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the Lp(a) concentration and the frequency distribution of the apo(a) isoforms of a myocardial infarcted male group under 60 years old and a group of healthy subjects (controls).

METHODS

A total of 111 infarcted men and 99 men free from disease were enrolled in this study. Lp(a) concentrations were measured by a commercial available rate nephelometry method, and apolipoprotein(a) isoform analysis was performed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and immunoblotting.

RESULTS

Infarcted patients had higher Lp(a) concentrations (0.33 +/- 0.36 g/l) than noninfarcted subjects did (0.19 +/- 0.22 g/l), and these differences were significant (P = 0.001). Infarcted patients have also shown a greater proportion of elevated (> or = 0.30 g/l) Lp(a) concentrations 37.8% than controls 20.2% (P < 0.01). The distributions of apo(a) phenotypes for patients with myocardial infarction and controls were remarkably different (P < 0.001), and the proportions of smaller isoforms were significantly different by chi-square analysis (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Infarcted patients under 60 years old display higher Lp(a) concentrations and a significantly higher proportion of low molecular weight apolipoprotein(a) isoforms than controls.

Lipoprotein(a) concentration increases during treatment with carbamazepine

PURPOSE

Treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ) is known to affect apolipoprotein B-containing lipoprotein concentrations in serum. However, little is known about the effects of anticonvulsant drugs (AEDs) on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], although Lp(a) has been characterized as independent cardiovascular risk factor. We investigated prospectively the effect of CBZ on lipoprotein(a) concentration in normolipidemic healthy adults.

METHODS

Twenty male volunteers were included in the study. Lp(a) levels were determined before and 69 +/- 19 days after CBZ administration by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay.

RESULTS

CBZ (mean plasma concentration, 6.6 +/- 0.6 microg/ml) caused a significant increase in Lp(a) concentrations, with a median change of +19.5% (95% CI: +8.2, +53.3; p < 0.001). Total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides also increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the precise mechanism of action of CBZ on Lp(a) elevation remains uncertain, it might be related to its enzyme-inducing properties. During treatment with CBZ, special focus should be given to elevated LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) concentrations with regard to increased risk for atherosclerotic vascular diseases.

Fibrinolytic parameters and lipoprotein(a) in young women with myocardial infarction

Impaired fibrinolysis and elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) are possible nonclassic risk factors for myocardial infarction (MI) at young age. The fibrinolytic system in young women with MI has not been evaluated yet and the role of Lp(a) is still controversial. The authors determined fibrinolytic parameters and Lp(a) in premenopausal women (mean age 42+/-3 years, n = 22) 0.5 to 6 (mean 3.5) years after MI, who were all without severe classic risk factors and had an otherwise low risk for MI. Elevated levels of tissue type plasminogen activator (t-PA) (p< 0.05) were measured in comparison to 52 age-matched controls; no difference was found in plasminogen activator inhibitor, plasminogen, fibrinogen, euglobulin clotting time and D-dimers. Significantly more MI patients had Lp(a) levels greater than 300 mg/L compared to controls (36% vs 13.5%, p< 0.05). The combination of elevated Lp(a), mild hyperlipidemia, and nonsevere smoking was found in 62.5% of MI patients who had elevated levels of Lp(a), in 23% of all women with MI, and in none of the controls. Elevated t-PA is probably only a marker of increased risk of MI, whereas elevated Lp(a) probably has a causative role. A combination of elevated Lp(a), hyperlipidemia, and nonsevere smoking seems to be a high-risk profile, relatively common in young women with MI.

Lipoprotein(a) serum levels and vascular diseases in an older Caucasian population cohort. Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels as a risk factor for stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, intermittent claudication, and combination of the above in a cohort of unselected older individuals.

DESIGN

Population cohort from one of the eight centers participating in the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA).

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

A subsample of 446 subjects (M/F: 231/ 215, mean age: 74.5 +/- 5.7 years) of the original, randomly selected, population cohort of 704 individuals, 65 to 84 years of age, free-living or institutionalized in the Impruneta Municipality, area of Florence, Italy.

MEASUREMENTS

Conventional vascular risk factors and vascular diseases defined following a two-step procedure (screening phase and confirmation on positives) using standard and validated criteria. Lp(a) levels determined by an ELISA method.

RESULTS

No association was observed between elevated Lp(a) levels alone and any of the examined vascular diseases (stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, and intermittent claudication). In contrast, examining the interactions between elevated Lp(a) and conventional vascular risk factors, when elevated Lp(a) was combined with a history of smoking, a marked increase in the risk of vascular diseases combined (odds ratio [OR]: 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-13.40) was observed, much higher than that expected based on the additive effect of smoking and elevated Lp(a) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

With the cautions due to the cross-sectional design of the study and the limited statistical power, these results suggest a possible synergistic effect between elevated Lp(a) levels and other pro-atherogenic factors such as smoking on the risk of vascular diseases in older individuals.

Prospective association of lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apo(a) size with coronary heart disease among men in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

In this nested case-control study, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations and apo(a) isoform size were measured in serum samples obtained from men participating in the prospective Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Serum from men aged 35 to 57 years and stored for up to 20 years were analyzed for Lp(a) levels (n=736) and isoform size (n=487), respectively. Cases involved nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MI; n=98), documented during the active phase of the study that ended on February 28, 1982 and coronary heart disease (CHD) deaths (n=148) monitored through 1990. Median Lp(a) levels did not differ between cases and controls and mean apo(a) size did not vary between cases and controls in the entire study population. When adjusted for age and Lp(a) concentration, logistic regression analysis indicated that small apo(a) isoforms were associated with CHD deaths among smokers (OR 3.31; 95% CI 1.07-10.28).

Substituting walnuts for monounsaturated fat improves the serum lipid profile of hypercholesterolemic men and women. A randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that walnuts reduce serum cholesterol levels in normal young men.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the acceptability of walnuts and their effects on serum lipid levels and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidizability in free-living hypercholesterolemic persons.

DESIGN

Randomized, crossover feeding trial.

SETTING

Lipid clinic at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

55 men and women (mean age, 56 years) with polygenic hypercholesterolemia.

INTERVENTION

A cholesterol-lowering Mediterranean diet and a diet of similar energy and fat content in which walnuts replaced approximately 35% of the energy obtained from monounsaturated fat. Patients followed each diet for 6 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Low-density lipoprotein fatty acids (to assess compliance), serum lipid levels, lipoprotein(a) levels, and LDL resistance to in vitro oxidative stress.

RESULTS

49 persons completed the trial. The walnut diet was well tolerated. Planned and observed diets were closely matched. Compared with the Mediterranean diet, the walnut diet produced mean changes of -4.1% in total cholesterol level, -5.9% in LDL cholesterol level, and -6.2% in lipoprotein(a) level. The mean differences in the changes in serum lipid levels were -0.28 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.43 to -0.12 mmol/L) (-10.8 mg/dL [-16.8 to -4.8 mg/dL]) (P<0.001) for total cholesterol level, -0.29 mmol/L (CI, -0.41 to -0.15 mmol/L) (-11.2 mg/dL [-16.3 to -6.1 mg/dL]) (P<0.001) for LDL cholesterol level, and -0.021 g/L (CI, -0.042 to -0.001 g/L) (P = 0.042) for lipoprotein(a) level. Lipid changes were similar in men and women except for lipoprotein(a) levels, which decreased only in men. Low-density lipoprotein particles were enriched with polyunsaturated fatty acids from walnuts, but their resistance to oxidation was preserved.

CONCLUSION

Substituting walnuts for part of the mono-unsaturated fat in a cholesterol-lowering Mediterranean diet further reduced total and LDL cholesterol levels in men and women with hypercholesterolemia.

Associations among serum lipoprotein(a) levels, apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction in patients with extremely low and high levels of serum lipoprotein(a)

A high serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level, which is genetically determined by apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] size polymorphism, is an independent risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis. However, the associations among Lp(a) levels, apo(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction (MI) have not been studied. Patients with MI (cases, n = 101, M/F: 86/15, age: 62+/-10y) and control subjects (n = 92, M/F: 53/39, age: 58+/-14y) were classified into quintile groups (Groups I to V) according to Lp(a) levels. Apo(a) isoform phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high-resolution technique using sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose/gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (3-6%), which identified 26 different apo(a) phenotypes, including a null type. Groups with higher Lp(a) levels (Groups II, III, and V) had higher percentages of MI patients than that with the lowest Lp(a) levels (Group I) (54%, 56%, or 75% vs. 32%, p<0.05). Groups with different Lp(a) levels had different frequency distributions of apo(a) isoprotein phenotypes: Groups II, III, IV, and V, which had increasing Lp(a) levels, had increasingly higher percentages of smaller isoforms (A1-A4, A5-A9) and decreasingly lower percentages of large isoforms (A10-A20, A21-A25) compared to Group I. An apparent inverse relationship existed between Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype. Subjects with the highest Lp(a) levels (Group V) had significantly (p<0.05) higher serum levels of total cholesterol, apo B, and Lp(a). Patients with MI and the controls had different distributions of apo(a) phenotypes: i.e., more small isoforms and more large size isoforms, respectively (A1-A4/A5-A9/A10-A20/A21-A25: 35.7%/27.7%/20.8%/15.8% and 22.8%/23.9%/29.4%/23.9%, respectively). Lp(a) (parameter estimate +/- standard error: 0.70+/-0.20, Wald chi2 = 12.4, p = 0.0004), apo(a) phenotype (-0.43+/-0.15, Wald chi2 = 8.17, p = 0.004), High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, apo A-I, and apo B were significantly associated with MI after adjusting for age, gender, and conventional risk factors, as assessed by a univariate logistic regression analysis. The association between Lp(a) and MI was independent of the apo(a) phenotype, but the association between the apo(a) phenotype and MI was not independent of Lp(a), as assessed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis. This association was not influenced by other MI- or Lp(a)-related lipid variables. These results suggest that apo(a) phenotype contributes to, but does not completely explain, the increased Lp(a) levels in MI. A stepwise logistic regression analysis with and without Lp(a) in the model identified Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype as significant predictors for MI, respectively.

Determination of free apolipoprotein(a) in serum by immunoassay and its significance for risk assessment in patients with coronary artery disease

This paper describes a new enzyme-linked ligand sorbent assay (ELLSA) to quantify free apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). The new test immobilizes free apo(a) utilizing a specific peptide that carries the amino acid sequence of a non-covalent apo(a) binding site on apoB3375-3405 (ligand-peptide). The ligand-peptide coupled to Sepharose was used in affinity chromatography to separate free apo(a) from whole serum. Isolated free apo(a) consisted of full length apo(a) and smaller apo(a). Additionally, free apo(a) levels determined by ELLSA as well as by electroimmunodiffusion correlated moderately well. Significantly increased serum concentrations of free apo(a) were found in coronary artery disease. The mean value of free apo(a) was three times higher in patients than in controls while the lipoprotein(a) (Lpla)) concentration was doubled. Utilizing receiver operating characteristic diagrams, it was shown that the free apo(a)-ELLSA had a better diagnostic test performance in atherosclerotic risk assessment than the Lp(a)-test: specificity free apo(a)-ELLSA 0.77, Lp(a)-test 0.81 [with (a:a)-enzyme immunoassay (EIA)] to 0.83 [with (a:B)-EIA]; sensitivity free apo(a)-ELLSA 0.57, Lp(a)-test 0.36 to 0.40. In conclusion, the new free apo(a)-ELLSA allows for the specific quantification of free apo(a). This provides an interesting indicator for atherosclerotic risk assessment.

Lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for coronary artery disease

Since its identification by Kåre Berg in 1963, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has become a focus of research interest owing to the results of case-control and prospective studies linking elevated plasma levels of this lipoprotein with the development of coronary artery disease. Lp(a) contains a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like moiety, in which the apolipoprotein B-100 component is covalently linked to the unique glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. Apo(a) is composed of repeated loop-shaped units called kringles, the sequences of which are highly similar to a kringle motif present in the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen. Variability in the number of repeated kringle units in the apo(a) molecule gives rise to different-sized Lp(a) isoforms in the population. Based on the similarity of Lp(a) to both LDL and plasminogen, it has been hypothesized that the function of this unique lipoprotein may represent a link between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. However, determination of the function of Lp(a) in vivo remains elusive. Although Lp(a) has been shown to accumulate in atherosclerotic lesions, its contribution to the development of atheromas is unclear. This uncertainty is related in part to the structural complexity of the apo(a) component of Lp(a) (particularly apo(a) isoform size heterogeneity), which also poses a challenge for standardization of the measurement of Lp(a) in plasma. The fact that plasma Lp(a) levels are largely genetically determined and vary widely among different ethnic groups adds scientific interest to the ongoing study of this enigmatic particle. Most recently, the identification of proteolytic fragments of apo(a) in both plasma and urine has fueled speculation about the origin of these fragments and their possible function in the atherosclerotic process.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and non-lipid risk factors in patients with early onset coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI Family Heart Study

BACKGROUND

A positive interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and unfavorable plasma lipid levels has been reported to result in very high risk for premature coronary artery disease (CAD). We further examined this issue for men and women with early onset CAD. We also examined potential interactions between Lp(a) and non-lipid risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 338 men and women with early onset CAD (most with a positive family history of early CAD) and 480 general population controls, we measured Lp(a), lipids and other risk factors. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD was 1.7 (P = 0.002) for plasma Lp(a) >50 mg/dl. Elevated Lp(a) level was found to interact with adjusted plasma total/high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol such that when Lp(a) was over 50 mg/dl and adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol >5.8, relative odds for CAD were 8.0-9.6 (P<0.0001) in multiple logistic regression. Non-lipid risk factors were generally found to multiply the risk associated with Lp(a) (as predicted by logistic regression) without evidence for interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We find evidence that Lp(a) does interact positively with adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol ratio. Aggressive risk factor intervention, especially for lipids, in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.

Standardization and clinical management of lipoprotein(a) measurements

The present article proposes personal suggestions to improve determinations and clinical interpretation of results of lipoprotein(a) assays. Methods and procedures for sampling and quantification of the various isoforms of lipoprotein(a) in serum, plasma and urine are reviewed with the aim of improving the reliability and reproducibility of results and reinforcing the clinical utility of lipoprotein(a) measurements.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and nonlipid risk factors in early familial coronary artery disease

An interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], unfavorable plasma lipids, and other risk factors may lead to very high risk for premature CAD. Plasma Lp(a), lipids, and other coronary risk factors were examined in 170 cases with early familial CAD and 165 control subjects to test this hypothesis. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD were 2.95 (P < .001) for plasma Lp(a) above 40 mg/dL. Nearly all the risk associated with elevated Lp(a) was found to be restricted to persons with historically elevated plasma total cholesterol (6.72 mmol/L [260 mg/dL] or higher) or with a total/HDL cholesterol ratio > 5.8. Nonlipid risk factors were also found to at least multiply the risk associated with Lp(a). When Lp(a) was over 40 mg/dL and plasma total/HDL cholesterol > 5.8, relative odds for CAD were 25 (P = .0001) in multiple logistic regression. If two or more nonlipid risk factors were also present (including hypertension, diabetes, cigarette smoking, high total homocysteine, or low serum bilirubin), relative odds were 122 (P < 1 x 10(-12)). The ability of nonlipid risk factors to increase risk associated with Lp(a) was dependent on at least a mildly elevated total/HDL cholesterol ratio. In conclusion, high Lp(a) was found to greatly increase risk only if the total/HDL cholesterol ratio was at least mildly elevated, an effect exaggerated by other risk factors. Aggressive lipid lowering in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.

Interaction of family history of atherosclerosis with atherogenic lipid traits in men with non-coronary atherosclerosis

Family history of atherosclerosis has been recognised as an nonmodifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Lipid levels, together with hypertension and diabetes, appear to have an inheritable component. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether lipoprotein abnormalities of 169 adult patients with non-coronary atherosclerosis were associated with a family history of atherosclerosis. Besides intermediate density lipopoprotein composition and Lp(a) levels, we focused on apo(a) and apo E phenotypes, LDL cholesterol/apo B ratio, VLDL triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio, and environmental factors. We found that patients with a family history of atherosclerosis had a higher prevalence of VLDL triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio above 1.8 (51.3% vs 34.7%) than patients without. Similarly, there was a significant inverse correlation between both considered ratios (r = -0.24, p < 0.05). The odds ratio of the presence of both abnormal ratios (4.60, 95% CI, 1.41-15.00) and low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms (3.30, 95% CI, 1.05-10.30 and family history of atherosclerosis was independent of smoking and hypertension. Apo(a) isoform size seems to be more important than Lp(a) concentrations in the family history of atherosclerosis risk determination. Subsequent analysis showed that patients with a family history of atherosclerosis had a greater-than-fourfold increased risk of having one or both abnormal ratios reflecting metabolic disturbances which probably constitute a combined trait. Family history of atherosclerosis may constitute a specific lipoprotein-related marker of atherosclerosis. Such a marker often precedes the onset of overt disease and may contribute to identifying patients with an atherogenic lipoprotein profile even in the absence of classical lipid risk factors.

Lipoprotein(a) phenotypes in Japanese children: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations have been demonstrated to be associated with cardiovascular diseases due to premature atherosclerosis. However, the association of Lp(a) phenotypes with the development of these diseases remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

We analyzed the population-based frequencies of serum Lp(a) phenotypes in 269 Japanese children aged 8-13 years in one community. According to the different apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] electrophoretic mobilities, Lp(a) was classified into seven single-band and respective double-band phenotypes. Each individual expressed a single (homozygotic) or a double band (heterozygotic).

RESULTS

The serum Lp(a) concentration frequency distribution was skewed toward lower levels with a mean +/- SD of 15.5 +/- 18.0 mg/dl and a median of 11.0 mg/dl. The Lp(a) phenotype frequencies revealed that the frequency of double-band phenotype expression (55%) was higher than that of single bands (44%) and that the frequency of phenotypes representative of low molecular weight apo(a) was very low (2%). The mean serum Lp(a) concentration of the double-band-expressing subjects was higher than that of subjects with the single-band phenotype (20.1 +/- 19.9 vs. 10.5 +/- 15.9 mg/dl, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings of Lp(a) phenotypes in children seemed to differ from those in Japanese adults in another study; contrary to expectation, the predominant Lp(a) phenotypes found in children were those frequently associated with cardiovascular diseases in adults. Thus, it is speculated that children whose Lp(a) phenotypes remain unchanged during the transition to adulthood may show an increased susceptibility to cardiovascular disease, although the nutritional effects on the Lp(a) phenotypes cannot be neglected.

Lipoprotein(a) as a determinant of coronary heart disease in young women

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] appears to be a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in men. The role of Lp(a) in women, however, is less clear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the ability of Lp(a) to predict CHD in a population-based case-control study of women 65 years of age or younger who lived in the greater Stockholm area. Subjects were all patients hospitalized for an acute CHD event between February 1991 and February 1994. Control subjects were randomly selected from the city census and were matched to patients by age and catchment area. Lp(a) was measured 3 months after hospitalization by use of an immunoturbidometric method (Incstar) calibrated to the Northwest Lipid Research Laboratories (coefficient of variation was < 9%). Of the 292 consecutive patients, 110 (37%) were hospitalized for an acute myocardial infarction, and 182 were hospitalized (63%) for angina pectoris. The mean age for both patients and control subjects was 56 +/- 7 years. Of participants, 74 patients (25%) and 84 control subjects (29%) were premenopausal. The distributions of Lp(a) were highly skewed in both patients and control subjects, with a range from 0.001 to 1.14 g/L. Age-adjusted odds ratio for CHD in the highest versus the lowest quartile of Lp(a) was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 3.7). After adjustment for age, smoking, education, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL, the odds ratio was 2.9 (95% CI, 1.6 to 5.0). The odds ratios were similar when myocardial infarction and angina patients were compared with their respective control subjects. The odds ratios were 5.1 (95% CI, 1.4 to 18.4) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.5) in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that Lp(a) is a determinant of CHD in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Risk of primary and recurrent acute myocardial infarction from lipoprotein(a) in men and women

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine whether lipoprotein(a) concentrations were risk factors for a first acute and recurrent myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence concerning the risk of acute myocardial infarction from lipoprotein(a). No studies have examined the risk of recurrent acute myocardial infarction from lipoprotein(a), and few have addressed the risk in women.

METHODS

This was a population-based case-control study of 893 men and women 35 to 69 years old participating in the World Health Organization Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) Project in Newcastle, Australia in 1993 to 1994. Case and control patients were classified into those with and without a previous myocardial infarction, and median lipoprotein(a) concentrations were compared after adjusting for other variables. Quintiles of lipoprotein(a) concentration were also examined.

RESULTS

Compared with control subjects without a previous myocardial infarction, median lipoprotein(a) concentrations increased from case patients with a first myocardial infarction (15 mg/liter higher, 95% confidence interval [CI] -36 to 60) to control patients with a previous myocardial infarction (159 mg/ liter higher, 95% CI 40 to 278) and case patients with a previous myocardial infarction (60 mg/liter higher, 95% CI -16 to 136, p < 0.01, test for trend). Women had significantly higher lipoprotein(a) concentrations than men (median 71 mg/liter higher, 95% CI 23 to 118). The highest quintile of lipoprotein(a) (>550 mg/liter) was a significant risk factor for a first acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.03); but in those with a previous myocardial infarction, the highest quintile was not associated with recurrent myocardial infarction (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.37).

CONCLUSIONS

High lipoprotein(a) concentrations may be a marker of vascular or tissue injury or may be associated with other genetic or environmental factors that cause acute myocardial infarction. Currently, lipoprotein(a) measurement cannot be recommended for assessment of risk for acute myocardial infarction.

Lack of increased coronary atherosclerotic risk due to elevated lipoprotein(a) in women > or = 55 years of age

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have indicated that there is an association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery disease (CAD) in middle-aged men; however, few studies have addressed this issue in women or the elderly.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serum Lp(a) concentrations were determined in 354 women and 706 men with or without angiographically defined CAD (one or more coronary arteries with narrowing of > or = 75%). The age-specific impact of elevated Lp(a) (> or = 30 mg/dL) on CAD was examined in each sex. In the younger age group (< 55 years old), elevated Lp(a) was independently associated with CAD in both sexes (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: women, 6.90, P < .01; men, 2.63, P < .05). The age-specific ORs declined with age, and elevated Lp(a) no longer conferred an increased CAD risk in either elderly men or women > or = 65 years old. In the age group of 55 to 64 years, elevated Lp(a) was positively associated with CAD for men (adjusted OR: 2.45, P < .05) but not for women (adjusted OR: 0.56, P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

For both sexes, elevated Lp(a) appears to be an independent risk factor for premature CAD and the importance of Lp(a) appears to decrease with age. However, for women, the risk estimate of Lp(a) began to decline at an age approximately 10 years younger than for men. These data suggest that not only age- but also sex-specific factors such as menstrual status may interact with the association between Lp(a) and CAD.

Lipoprotein(a) concentrations and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: relationship to glycaemic control and diabetic complications

The aim of our study was to determine the lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and to evaluate Lp(a) concentrations in relation to glycaemic control and diabetic complications. We evaluate in a cross-sectional study a total of 103 NIDDM patients (52 males and 51 females; mean age of 62.5 years; mean of diabetes duration: 12 years) referred to our hospital because of poor glycaemic control, and a group of 108 non-diabetic subjects (57 males and 51 females).

RESULTS

mean Lp(a) concentration did not significantly differ between NIDDM patients and non-diabetic subjects (11.1 +/- 14 vs. 16.2 +/- 14 mg/dl). The distribution of Lp(a) levels was highly skewed towards the lower levels in both groups, being over 30 mg/dl in only 6% of NIDDM patients and 12% of controls. Patients with Lp(a) levels over 10 mg/dl had lower haemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) than patients with Lp(a) levels over 10 mg/dl (8.5% vs. 10.4%; P < 0.01). Lp(a) concentration was positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.05) and HbA1c (P < 0.05). No association was found between Lp(a) and sex, age, other lipidic parameters, microalbuminuria, type of treatment and presence of cardiovascular disease. These findings may suggest that glycaemic control could have a modulatory role on Lp(a) concentration in NIDDM patients. In this study, diabetic complications did not seem to be associated with higher Lp(a) concentrations.

Lipoprotein(a) plasma levels and apo(a) isoforms are not associated with longevity or disability in a sample of Italian octo-nonagenarians. Associazione Medica Sabin

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of disability and mortality in western countries. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is now considered an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, and might consequently be related to longevity and/or disability. In the context of a study on metabolic and anthropometric parameters in a sample of Italian octo-nonagenarians, Lp(a) and apo(a) isoforms were evaluated. One-hundred and fifty Italian octo-nonagenarians were classified as free-living or disabled, according to Katz's index, and compared to 91 healthy control adults. All the study subjects were recruited from a valley (Val Vibrata valley) near Teramo, in the central part of Italy. The median Lp(a) concentration of the whole group was 17 mg/dL (range 1-161 mg/dL), which is much higher than the values observed in Caucasian populations. No differences were detected between the octo-nonagenarian group (median 16 mg/dL, range 1-126 mg/dL) and the control group (median 19.5 mg/dL, range 1-161 mg/dL), nor between the free-living and the disabled groups. Apo(a) isoforms were similarly distributed among free-living, disabled and control subjects. While our findings suggest that Lp(a) plasma levels and apo(a) isoforms are not factors associated with longevity or disability, we cannot exclude that the low incidence of other major risk factors for atherosclerosis in our free-living octo-nonagenarians hampered the full expression of the lipoprotein(a) atherogenic potential, and thus allowed the achievement of a very old age in a good healthy status, even in carriers of high Lp(a) levels or small apo(a) isoforms.

High prevalence of antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae; determinants of IgG and IgA seropositivity among Jerusalem residents

The prevalence of antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae was examined in a stratified random sample of 581 Jerusalem adult residents between August 1987 and March 1989. IgG and IgA titres were measured by microimmunofluorescence, and associations with smoking and socio-demographic variables were assessed. IgG antibodies were found in 84.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.4-87.9) of men and 68.7% (95% CI: 61.6-75.0) of women (P < 0.0001 for sex difference), indicating a very high rate of exposure in this population. IgA antibodies, postulated to represent persistent infection, were present in 45.1% (95% CI: 40.1-50.2) of men and 23% (95% CI: 17.4-29.7) of women (P < 0.0001 for sex difference). Factors associated with IgG seropositivity included family size, education and social class. On the other hand age (in men) and smoking were associated with IgA seropositivity. These findings support the hypothesis that low socioeconomic status and household crowding may be predictive of exposure to or infection with this organism (IgG seropositivity), whereas they do not explain persistence of the infection putatively expressed as IgA seropositivity.

A prospective investigation of elevated lipoprotein (a) detected by electrophoresis and cardiovascular disease in women. The Framingham Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Sinking prebeta lipoprotein is a putative marker for elevated levels of lipoprotein (a). Although prospective data suggest that increased plasma lipoprotein (a) is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease in men, no prospective studies are available in women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1968 through 1975, sinking prebeta lipoprotein was determined by paper electrophoresis in 3103 women Framingham Heart Study participants who were free of prevalent cardiovascular disease. A sinking prebeta lipoprotein band was detectable in 434 of the women (14%) studied. The median follow-up interval was approximately 12 years. Incident cardiovascular disease was associated with band presence using a proportional hazards model that included age, smoking, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, glucose intolerance, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and ECG left ventricular hypertrophy. Multivariable adjusted relative risk estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) for outcomes in the band present versus absent groups were as follows: myocardial infarction (82 events), 2.37 (1.48 to 3.81); intermittent claudication (62 events), 1.94 (1.07 to 3.50); cerebrovascular disease (83 events), 1.88 (1.12 to 3.15); total coronary heart disease (174 events), 1.61 (1.13 to 2.29); and total cardiovascular disease (305 events), 1.44 (1.09 to 1.91). A subset analysis indicated that band presence was 50.9% sensitive and 95.4% specific for detecting plasma lipoprotein (a) levels of > 30 mg/dL, the threshold value linked to increased cardiovascular disease risk in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinking prebeta lipoprotein was a valid surrogate for elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in Framingham Heart Study women. Band presence and, equivalently, elevated plasma lipoprotein (a), was a strong, independent predictor of myocardial infarction, intermittent claudication, and cerebrovascular disease. Confirmation of these findings in other longitudinal studies of women is needed.

Association of apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in children with family history of premature coronary artery disease

Although blacks have higher plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] than whites, the Lp(a) levels are not associated with clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) or parental history of myocardial infarction in blacks. To explore whether ethnic differences in the pathogenicity of Lp(a) are related to the thrombogenic component of Lp(a), this study investigated in children the associations of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and Lp(a) levels with family history of premature CAD. Subjects were 46 children aged 7 to 11 years divided according to family history of premature CAD and assessed for Lp(a), apo(a) phenotypes, and other lipids and lipoproteins. The prevalence of small isoforms was higher in children with positive family history of premature CAD than in children with negative family history of premature CAD (32% versus 10%). Large isoforms were more prevalent in whites (24% versus 6%), and medium-sized isoforms were more prevalent in blacks (75% versus 52%). The black/white difference was smaller (19% versus 24%) in regard to small isoforms. Lp(a) levels were inversely related to apo(a) size in both blacks and whites (P = .084 and P = .049, respectively). Single-banded small apo(a) isoforms predicted positive family history of premature CAD, independent of ethnicity and Lp(a) levels. Small apo(a) isoforms in children were independent predictors of family history of premature CAD. Unlike Lp(a), they appear to be equally pathogenic for blacks and whites.

Evidence that apolipoprotein(a) phenotype is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men < 55 years of age

Whereas the importance of plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels as a risk factor for premature coronary artery disease (CAD) is certain, it is not clear if the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype plays an additional and independent role. To investigate the possible effect of apo(a) phenotype on premature CAD (in patients < 55 years of age), plasma Lp(a) concentrations, the apo(a) phenotypes, and their relation with many recognized CAD risk factors were examined in 96 non-diabetic male patients with angiographically defined CAD and in 83 age-matched male control subjects with no angiographic evidence of CAD. Results demonstrate that patients with premature CAD are characterized by higher Lp(a) levels (24 +/- 21 vs 17 +/- 15 mg/dl, p < 0.01) and a higher frequency of S2 phenotype (32% vs 15%, p < 0.01). Patients with an S2 phenotype exhibited significantly higher plasma Lp(a) concentrations than control subjects with the same isoform (37 +/- 22 vs 22 +/- 17 mg/dl, p < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between apo B and Lp(a) levels in patients with an S2 phenotype. In addition, patients had a low frequency of S1 and S4, and a high frequency of double-band phenotypes of apo(a). Multivariate analysis did not demonstrate an independent role for apo(a) phenotype as a risk factor for premature CAD. In conclusion, CAD patients < 55 years of age have a very different pattern of apo(a) phenotypes than subjects with no angiographic evidence of CAD; this study confirms the hypothesis that apo(a) phenotype may play an additional role in the etiology of premature CAD.

Association between lipoprotein(a) and progression of coronary artery disease in middle-aged men

The association between lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with other serum lipids was evaluated in 104 patients with angiographically proven coronary atherosclerosis. Patients were randomized to either an intervention or a control group. The 12-month intervention program consisted of a low-fat diet and daily physical exercise. Patients in the control group received "usual care" by their private physician. Eighty-three patients (36 in the intervention and 47 in the control group) underwent repeat angiography after 1 year. Angiographically documented net regression was seen in 13 patients (8 in the intervention and 5 in the control group), no change was seen in 40 patients (21 in the intervention and 19 in the control group) and progression was noted in 30 patients (7 in the intervention and 23 in the control group). No correlation could be shown between Lp(a) and angiographically documented progression of the disease. In a multivariate analysis including metabolic variables, group assignment, age and smoking habits, only assignment to the intervention group (p = 0.0075) and a decrease in total cholesterol (p = 0.0167) were independently associated with the course of the disease. Patients with or without previous myocardial infarction (70 vs 34) did not differ in Lp(a) levels (median 9.15 vs 14.25 mg/dl). Patients with Lp(a) > 25 mg/dl were younger than patients with Lp(a) < or = 25 mg/dl (52 vs 55 years; p < 0.03), indicating a connection between Lp(a) and the development of premature CAD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)