Structure of single-stranded nucleic acids in the presence of ribosomal protein S1

Unique localization of the plastid-specific ribosomal proteins in the chloroplast ribosome small subunit provides mechanistic insights into the chloroplastic translation

Chloroplastic translation is mediated by a bacterial-type 70S chloroplast ribosome. During the evolution, chloroplast ribosomes have acquired five plastid-specific ribosomal proteins or PSRPs (cS22, cS23, bTHXc, cL37 and cL38) which have been suggested to play important regulatory roles in translation. However, their exact locations on the chloroplast ribosome remain elusive due to lack of a high-resolution structure, hindering our progress to understand their possible roles. Here we present a cryo-EM structure of the 70S chloroplast ribosome from spinach resolved to 3.4 Å and focus our discussion mainly on the architecture of the 30S small subunit (SSU) which is resolved to 3.7 Å. cS22 localizes at the SSU foot where it seems to compensate for the deletions in 16S rRNA. The mRNA exit site is highly remodeled due to the presence of cS23 suggesting an alternative mode of translation initiation. bTHXc is positioned at the SSU head and appears to stabilize the intersubunit bridge B1b during thermal fluctuations. The translation factor plastid pY binds to the SSU on the intersubunit side and interacts with the conserved nucleotide bases involved in decoding. Most of the intersubunit bridges are conserved compared to the bacteria, except for a new bridge involving uL2c and bS6c.

Roles for Synonymous Codon Usage in Protein Biogenesis

Owing to the degeneracy of the genetic code, a protein sequence can be encoded by many different synonymous mRNA coding sequences. Synonymous codon usage was once thought to be functionally neutral, but evidence now indicates it is shaped by evolutionary selection and affects other aspects of protein biogenesis beyond specifying the amino acid sequence of the protein. Synonymous rare codons, once thought to have only negative impacts on the speed and accuracy of translation, are now known to play an important role in diverse functions, including regulation of cotranslational folding, covalent modifications, secretion, and expression level. Mutations altering synonymous codon usage are linked to human diseases. However, much remains unknown about the molecular mechanisms connecting synonymous codon usage to efficient protein biogenesis and proper cell physiology. Here we review recent literature on the functional effects of codon usage, including bioinformatics approaches aimed at identifying general roles for synonymous codon usage.

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 unfolds structured mRNAs onto the ribosome for active translation initiation

Regulation of translation initiation is well appropriate to adapt cell growth in response to stress and environmental changes. Many bacterial mRNAs adopt structures in their 5' untranslated regions that modulate the accessibility of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Structured mRNAs interact with the 30S in a two-step process where the docking of a folded mRNA precedes an accommodation step. Here, we used a combination of experimental approaches in vitro (kinetic of mRNA unfolding and binding experiments to analyze mRNA-protein or mRNA-ribosome complexes, toeprinting assays to follow the formation of ribosomal initiation complexes) and in vivo (genetic) to monitor the action of ribosomal protein S1 on the initiation of structured and regulated mRNAs. We demonstrate that r-protein S1 endows the 30S with an RNA chaperone activity that is essential for the docking and the unfolding of structured mRNAs, and for the correct positioning of the initiation codon inside the decoding channel. The first three OB-fold domains of S1 retain all its activities (mRNA and 30S binding, RNA melting activity) on the 30S subunit. S1 is not required for all mRNAs and acts differently on mRNAs according to the signals present at their 5' ends. This work shows that S1 confers to the ribosome dynamic properties to initiate translation of a large set of mRNAs with diverse structural features.

Ribosomal protein S1 unwinds double-stranded RNA in multiple steps

The sequence and secondary structure of the 5'-end of mRNAs regulate translation by controlling ribosome initiation on the mRNA. Ribosomal protein S1 is crucial for ribosome initiation on many natural mRNAs, particularly for those with structured 5'-ends, or with no or weak Shine-Dalgarno sequences. Besides a critical role in translation, S1 has been implicated in several other cellular processes, such as transcription recycling, and the rescuing of stalled ribosomes by tmRNA. The mechanisms of S1 functions are still elusive but have been widely considered to be linked to the affinity of S1 for single-stranded RNA and its corresponding destabilization of mRNA secondary structures. Here, using optical tweezers techniques, we demonstrate that S1 promotes RNA unwinding by binding to the single-stranded RNA formed transiently during the thermal breathing of the RNA base pairs and that S1 dissociation results in RNA rezipping. We measured the dependence of the RNA unwinding and rezipping rates on S1 concentration, and the force applied to the ends of the RNA. We found that each S1 binds 10 nucleotides of RNA in a multistep fashion implying that S1 can facilitate ribosome initiation on structured mRNA by first binding to the single strand next to an RNA duplex structure ("stand-by site") before subsequent binding leads to RNA unwinding. Unwinding by multiple small substeps is much less rate limited by thermal breathing than unwinding in a single step. Thus, a multistep scheme greatly expedites S1 unwinding of an RNA structure compared to a single-step mode.

Direct interaction of the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein S1 with protein S2 in Escherichia coli

Despite of the high resolution structure available for the E. coli ribosome, hitherto the structure and localization of the essential ribosomal protein S1 on the 30 S subunit still remains to be elucidated. It was previously reported that protein S1 binds to the ribosome via protein-protein interaction at the two N-terminal domains. Moreover, protein S2 was shown to be required for binding of protein S1 to the ribosome. Here, we present evidence that the N-terminal domain of S1 (amino acids 1-106; S1(106)) is necessary and sufficient for the interaction with protein S2 as well as for ribosome binding. We show that over production of protein S1(106) affects E. coli growth by displacing native protein S1 from its binding pocket on the ribosome. In addition, our data reveal that the coiled-coil domain of protein S2 (S2α(2)) is sufficient to allow protein S1 to bind to the ribosome. Taken together, these data uncover the crucial elements required for the S1/S2 interaction, which is pivotal for translation initiation on canonical mRNAs in gram-negative bacteria. The results are discussed in terms of a model wherein the S1/S2 interaction surface could represent a possible target to modulate the selectivity of the translational machinery and thereby alter the translational program under distinct conditions.

The roles of individual domains of RNase R in substrate binding and exoribonuclease activity. The nuclease domain is sufficient for digestion of structured RNA

RNase R and RNase II are the two representatives from the RNR family of processive, 3' to 5' exoribonucleases in Escherichia coli. Although RNase II is specific for single-stranded RNA, RNase R readily degrades through structured RNA. Furthermore, RNase R appears to be the only known 3' to 5' exoribonuclease that is able to degrade through double-stranded RNA without the aid of a helicase activity. Consequently, its functional domains and mechanism of action are of great interest. Using a series of truncated RNase R proteins we show that the cold-shock and S1 domains contribute to substrate binding. The cold-shock domains appear to play a role in substrate recruitment, whereas the S1 domain is most likely required to position substrates for efficient catalysis. Most importantly, the nuclease domain alone, devoid of the cold-shock and S1 domains, is sufficient for RNase R to bind and degrade structured RNAs. Moreover, this is a unique property of the nuclease domain of RNase R because this domain in RNase II stalls as it approaches a duplex. We also show that the nuclease domain of RNase R binds RNA more tightly than the nuclease domain of RNase II. This tighter binding may help to explain the difference in catalytic properties between RNase R and RNase II.

Interactions of ribosomal protein S1 with DsrA and rpoS mRNA

Ribosomal protein S1 is shown to interact with the non-coding RNA DsrA and with rpoS mRNA. DsrA is a non-coding RNA that is important in controlling expression of the rpoS gene product in Escherichia coli. Photochemical crosslinking, quadrupole-time of flight tandem mass spectrometry, and peptide sequencing have identified an interaction between DsrA and S1 in the 30S ribosomal subunit. Purified S1 binds both DsrA (K(obs) approximately 6 x 10(6) M(-1)) and rpoS mRNA (K(obs) approximately 3 x 10(7) M(-1)). Ribonuclease probing experiments indicate that S1 binding has a weak but detectable effect on the secondary structure of DsrA or rpoS mRNA.

Ribosomal protein S1 is required for translation of most, if not all, natural mRNAs in Escherichia coli in vivo

We have deleted the chromosomal rpsA gene, encoding ribosomal protein S1, from an Escherichia coli strain carrying a plasmid where rpsA was controlled by the lac promoter and operator. This exogenous source of protein S1 was essential for growth. Thus we have verified the absolute requirement for protein S1. To see if translation of individual mRNAs differed in the requirements for protein S1, we removed the inducer and followed the time-course of the synthesis of several individual proteins and of total RNA, DNA and protein. Growth immediately shifted from being exponential to being linear, with a rate of protein synthesis defined by the pre-existing amount of protein S1. The expression pattern of the individual proteins indicated that the translation of all mRNAs was dependent on protein S1. Unexpectedly, we found that depletion for protein S1 for extended periods introduced a starvation for amino acids. Such starvation was indicated by an increased synthesis of ppGpp and could be reversed by addition of a mixture of all 20 amino acids. Measurements of the peptide chain elongation rate in vivo showed that ribosomes without protein S1 were unable to interfere with the peptide chain elongation rate of the active ribosomes and that, therefore, protein S1 was unable to diffuse from one ribosome to another during translation. We conclude that protein S1-deficient ribosomes are totally inactive in peptide chain elongation on most, if not all, naturally occurring E. coli mRNAs.

The influence of ribosome-binding-site elements on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo

A method is described to determine simultaneously the effect of any changes in the ribosome-binding site (RBS) of mRNA on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo. The approach was used to analyse systematically the influence of spacing between the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the initiation codon, the three different initiation codons, and RBS secondary structure on translational yields in the two organisms. Both B. subtilis and E. coli exhibited similar spacing optima of 7-9 nucleotides. However, B. subtilis translated messages with spacings shorter than optimal much less efficiently than E. coli. In both organisms, AUG was the preferred initiation codon by two- to threefold. In E. coli GUG was slightly better than UUG while in B. subtilis UUG was better than GUG. The degree of emphasis placed on initiation codon type, as measured by translational yield, was dependent on the strength of the Shine-Dalgarno interaction in both organisms. B. subtilis was also much less able to tolerate secondary structure in the RBS than E. coli. While significant differences were found between the two organisms in the effect of specific RBS elements on translation, other mRNA components in addition to those elements tested appear to be responsible, in part, for translational species specificity. The approach described provides a rapid and systematic means of elucidating such additional determinants.

Cloning and characterization of a gene from Rhizobium melilotii 2011 coding for ribosomal protein S1

A 7 kb chromosomal DNA fragment from R. melilotii was cloned, which complemented temperature-sensitivity of an E. coli amber mutant in rpsA, the gene for ribosomal protein S1 (ES1). From complementation and maxicell analysis a 58 kd protein was identified as the homolog of protein S1 (RS1). DNA sequence analysis of the R. melilotii rpsA gene identified a protein of 568 amino acids, which showed 47% identical amino acid homology to protein S1 from E. coli. The RS1 protein lacked the two Cys residues which had been reported to play an important role for the function of ES1. Two repeats containing Shine-Dalgarno sequences were identified upstream of the structural gene. Binding studies with RNA polymerase from E. coli and Pseudomonas putida located one RNA-polymerase binding site close to the RS1 gene and another one several hundred basepairs upstream. One possible promoter was also identified by DNA sequence comparison with the corresponding E. coli promoter.

Molecular and functional properties of protein SS1 from small ribosomal subunits of Streptomyces aureofaciens

Small ribosomal subunits of gram-positive cells of Streptomyces aureofaciens contain an acidic protein designated SS1. Purified protein SS1 has the same mobility in sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel as ribosomal protein S1 of Escherichia coli (apparent Mr 68 000). Protein SS1 was dissected under mild conditions with trypsin and generated fragments were compared with well-characterized fragments of protein S1. The protein SS1 contains a structure homologous with the C-terminal fragment of protein S1. The affinity of protein SS1 to poly(U) is virtually identical with that of E. coli protein S1. In contrast to protein S1, the addition of SS1 to partially S1-depleted ribosomes of E. coli had no stimulatory effect on poly(U)-directed synthesis of polyphenylalanine. At molar excess of SS1 over ribosomes, the protein had comparable inhibitory effect on polypeptide synthesis as had S1 of E. coli. Ribosomes of S. aureofaciens required about one order of magnitude higher concentration of poly(U) for maximum synthetic activity than did ribosomes of E. coli. The addition of proteins SS1 or S1 to ribosomes of S. aureofaciens had no stimulatory effect on translation of poly(U). Our data indicate that the high-molecular-mass acidic protein SS1 of small ribosomal subunits of S. aureofaciens exhibits only a part of the functional properties of E. coli protein S1.

The binding of ribosomal protein S1 to S1-depleted 30S and 70S ribosomes. A fluorescence anisotropy study of the effects of Mg2+

We have determined the equilibrium constants for the binding of AEDANS-labelled S1 to S1-depleted 30S and 70S ribosomes. For "tight" ribosomes, the association of S1 increases with the sixth power of Mg2+ concentration, but for 30S subunits and "loose" ribosomes, there is virtually no dependence of the association on Mg2+ over the same concentration range, 2-10 mM in Mg2+. The binding of S1 to 70S ribosomes at 10 mM Mg2+ is stabilized by 2 kcal/mol compared to the binding to 30S subunits. When intact S1 binds to tight ribosomes, the fluorescence anisotrophy is that for virtually complete rotational immobilization. The anisotropies vary considerably with the preparation and treatment of both S1 and ribosomes and these variations are detailed here. The results suggest the linkage of Mg2+-dependent conformational changes in the intact ribosomes, perhaps including rRNA, and the binding of S1.

Nucleic acid binding properties of major proteins from the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins of wheat

Glycine-rich core hnRNP proteins purified from wheat bind tightly to single-stranded but not to double-stranded nucleic acids with a preference for natural RNA over single-stranded DNA. Binding results in i) a progressive disruption of the residual secondary structure of the polynucleotide and the formation of an extended nucleoprotein filament until a protein to polynucleotide weight ratio of about 5:1 is attained. As more protein is added, this is followed by ii) the formation of globular structures along the polynucleotide chain with a concomitant reduction in the contour length of the nucleoprotein complex. These two features of the interaction--unwinding and condensation into beads--are analogous to the previously described behavior of the major glycine-rich core hnRNP protein from Artemia salina (Thomas et al. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 2888) and may represent the basic functional properties of this relatively well conserved group of nuclear proteins.

Primary structure of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 and features of its functional domains

The complete covalent structure of ribosomal protein S1 of Escherichia coli has been determined and predictions made of its secondary structure. Protein S1 (E. coli MRE 600) is a single-chain, acidic protein with 557 amino acid residues of the composition Asp43, Asn23, Thr25, Ser25, Glu60, Gln14, Pro10, Gly48, Ala48, Val67, Met6, Ile30, Leu45, Tyr6, Phe17, His8, Lys43, Arg30, Trp7, Cys2 and an Mr of 61159. The two -SH groups of S1 are located in the central region of the chain at positions 292 and 349, the latter being the reactive group whose modification results in the reported loss of the nucleic-acid-unfolding ability of S1. The central region also contains the majority of the tryptophan, histidine and methionine residues of S1 and is predicted to have a secondary structure dominated by beta-sheets and turns. A direct proof for the location of the nucleic-acid-binding domain of S1 in the central region has recently been obtained [Subramanian et al. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 119, 245-249]. The N-terminal region of S1, which contains the ribosome-binding domain has a relatively high predicted alpha-helix content and no preponderance of basic amino acids. The facile trypsin-sensitive site in S1 is located at Arg-171, approximately at the border between the N-terminal and central regions. The acidic and basic amino acids of S1 (32.8% of all residues) are distributed throughout the chain, often in small clusters of between two and six residues. The amino acid sequence of S1 contains three 24-residue stretches with strong internal homology. Two of the stretches are located in the central, RNA-binding region, suggesting a possible role in the RNA-binding and helix-destabilizing functions of S1. A fragment of Mr 10(4) from the central region of S1 gives an anomalously high apparent Mr by dodecylsulfate gel electrophoresis, indicating a stable structural element therein and accounting for the apparent high Mr of S1 as determined by gel electrophoresis.

The caulobacters: ubiquitous unusual bacteria

Images

DNA electron microscopy

In recent years DNA electron microscopy has become a tool of increasing interest in the fields of molecular genetics and molecular and cell biology. Together with the development of in vitro recombination and DNA cloning, new electron microscope techniques have been developed with the aim of studying the structural and functional organization of genetic material. The most important methods are based on nucleic acid hybridizations: DNA-DNA hybridization (heteroduplex, D-loop), RNA-DNA hybridization (R-loop), or combinations of both (R-hybrid). They allow both qualitative and quantitative analysis of gene organization, position and extension of homology regions, and characterization of transcription. The reproducibility and resolution of these methods make it possible to map a specific DNA region within 50 to 100 nucleotides. Therefore they have become a prerequisite for determining regions of interest for subsequent nucleotide sequencing. Special methods have been developed also for the analysis of protein-DNA interaction: e.g., direct visualization of specific protein-DNA complexes (enzymes, regulatory proteins), and analysis of structures with higher complexity (chromatin, transcription complexes).

Nucleic acid binding and unfolding properties of ribosomal protein S1 and the derivatives S1-F1 and m1-S1

The nucleic acid binding and unwinding properties of wild-type Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 have been compared to those of a mutant form and a large trypsin-resistant fragment, both reported recently [J. Mol. Biol. 127, 41-45 (1979) and J. Biol. Chem. 254, 4309-4312 (1979). The mutant (m1-S1) contains 77% and the fragment (S1-F1) 66% of the polypeptide chain length (approximately 600 amino acid residues) of protein S1. The mutant is active in protein synthesis in vitro; the fragment, although retaining one or more of the functional domains of S1, is inactive in protein synthesis. We find that m1-S1 is is almost as effective as S1 in binding to poly(rU), phage MS2 RNA and simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA, and in unfolding poly(rU) and the helical structures present in MS2 RNA and phi X174 viral DNA. S1-F1, however, binds to poly(rU) and denatured SV40 DNA, but not to MS2 RNA. It unfolds neither poly(rU), nor the residual secondary structure of MS2 RNA or phi X174 viral DNA. Thus, there appears to be a correlation between the loss in ability of S1 to unwind RNA and the loss in its ability to function in protein synthesis.