Molecular interactions in the control region of the carAB operon encoding Escherichia coli carbamoylphosphate synthetase

Developing the E. coli platform for efficient production of UMP-derived chemicals

5-Methyluridine (5-MU) is a prominent intermediate for industrial synthesis of several antiviral-drugs, however, its availability over the past decades has overwhelmingly relied on chemical and enzymatic strategies. Here, we have realized efficient production of 5-MU in E. coli, for the first time, via a designer artificial pathway consisting of a two-enzyme cascade (UMP 5-methylase and phosphatase). More importantly, we have engineered the E. coli cell factory to boost 5-MU production by systematic evaluation of multiple strategies, and as a proof of concept, we have further developed an antibiotic-free fermentation strategy to realize 5-MU production (10.71 g/L) in E. coli MB229 (a ΔthyA strain). Remarkably, we have also established a versatile and robust platform with exploitation of the engineered E. coli for efficient production of diversified UMP-derived chemicals. This study paves the way for future engineering of E. coli as a synthetic biology platform for acceleratively accessing UMP-derived chemical diversities.

Bacteria employ lysine acetylation of transcriptional regulators to adapt gene expression to cellular metabolism

The Escherichia coli TetR-related transcriptional regulator RutR is involved in the coordination of pyrimidine and purine metabolism. Here we report that lysine acetylation modulates RutR function. Applying the genetic code expansion concept, we produced site-specifically lysine-acetylated RutR proteins. The crystal structure of lysine-acetylated RutR reveals how acetylation switches off RutR-DNA-binding. We apply the genetic code expansion concept in E. coli in vivo revealing the consequences of RutR acetylation on the transcriptional level. We propose a model in which RutR acetylation follows different kinetic profiles either reacting non-enzymatically with acetyl-phosphate or enzymatically catalysed by the lysine acetyltransferases PatZ/YfiQ and YiaC. The NAD+-dependent sirtuin deacetylase CobB reverses enzymatic and non-enzymatic acetylation of RutR playing a dual regulatory and detoxifying role. By detecting cellular acetyl-CoA, NAD+ and acetyl-phosphate, bacteria apply lysine acetylation of transcriptional regulators to sense the cellular metabolic state directly adjusting gene expression to changing environmental conditions.

Mechanisms and biotechnological applications of transcription factors

Transcription factors play an indispensable role in maintaining cellular viability and finely regulating complex internal metabolic networks. These crucial bioactive functions rely on their ability to respond to effectors and concurrently interact with binding sites. Recent advancements have brought innovative insights into the understanding of transcription factors. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the mechanisms by which transcription factors carry out their functions, along with calculation and experimental-based methods employed in their identification. Additionally, we highlight recent achievements in the application of transcription factors in various biotechnological fields, including cell engineering, human health, and biomanufacturing. Finally, the current limitations of research and provide prospects for future investigations are discussed. This review will provide enlightening theoretical guidance for transcription factors engineering.

Comprehensive discovery of novel structured noncoding RNAs in 26 bacterial genomes

Comparative sequence analysis methods are highly effective for uncovering novel classes of structured noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) from bacterial genomic DNA sequence datasets. Previously, we developed a computational pipeline to more comprehensively identify structured ncRNA representatives from individual bacterial genomes. This search process exploits the fact that genomic regions serving as templates for the transcription of structured RNAs tend to be present in longer than average noncoding 'intergenic regions' (IGRs) that are enriched in G and C nucleotides compared to the remainder of the genome. In the present study, we apply this computational pipeline to identify structured ncRNA candidates from 26 diverse bacterial species. Numerous novel structured ncRNA motifs were discovered, including several riboswitch candidates, one whose ligand has been identified and others that have yet to be experimentally validated. Our findings support recent predictions that hundreds of novel ribo-switch classes and other ncRNAs remain undiscovered among the limited number of bacterial species whose genomes have been completely sequenced.

A single P115Q mutation modulates specificity in the Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis arginine repressor

The arginine repressor (ArgR) regulates the expression of genes involved in arginine biosynthesis. Upon attaining a threshold concentration of arginine in the cytoplasm, the trimeric C-terminal domain of ArgR binds three arginines in a shallow surface cleft and subsequently hexamerizes forming a dimer of trimers containing six Arg co-repressor molecules which are buried at the subunit interfaces. The N-terminal domains of this complex bind to the DNA promoter thereby interrupting the transcription of the genes related to Arg biosynthesis. The crystal structures of the wild type and mutant Pro115Gln ArgR from Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis determined at 1.7 Å demonstrate that a single amino acid substitution switches co-repressor specificity from Tyr to Arg. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the first step, i.e., the binding of the co-repressor, occurs in the trimeric state and that Pro115Gln ArgR preferentially binds Arg. It was also shown that, in Pro115 ArgR hexamers, the concomitant binding of sodium ions shifts selectivity to Tyr. Structural data combined with phylogenetic analyses of ArgR from C. pseudotuberculosis suggest that substitutions in the binding pocket at position 115 may alter its specificity for amino acids and that the length of the protein interdomain linker can provide further functional flexibility. These results support the existence of alternative ArgR regulatory mechanisms in this pathogenic bacterium.

Diversity, versatility and complexity of bacterial gene regulation mechanisms: opportunities and drawbacks for applications in synthetic biology

Gene expression occurs in two essential steps: transcription and translation. In bacteria, the two processes are tightly coupled in time and space, and highly regulated. Tight regulation of gene expression is crucial. It limits wasteful consumption of resources and energy, prevents accumulation of potentially growth inhibiting reaction intermediates, and sustains the fitness and potential virulence of the organism in a fluctuating, competitive and frequently stressful environment. Since the onset of studies on regulation of enzyme synthesis, numerous distinct regulatory mechanisms modulating transcription and/or translation have been discovered. Mostly, various regulatory mechanisms operating at different levels in the flow of genetic information are used in combination to control and modulate the expression of a single gene or operon. Here, we provide an extensive overview of the very diverse and versatile bacterial gene regulatory mechanisms with major emphasis on their combined occurrence, intricate intertwinement and versatility. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of well-characterized basal expression and regulatory elements in synthetic biology applications, where they may ensure orthogonal, predictable and tunable expression of (heterologous) target genes and pathways, aiming at a minimal burden for the host.

Competitive Repression of the artPIQM Operon for Arginine and Ornithine Transport by Arginine Repressor and Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein in Escherichia coli

Two out of the three major uptake systems for arginine in Escherichia coli are encoded by the artJ-artPIQM gene cluster. ArtJ is the high-affinity periplasmic arginine-specific binding protein (ArgBP-I), whereas artI encodes the arginine and ornithine periplasmic binding protein (AO). Both ArtJ and ArtI are supposed to combine with the inner membrane-associated ArtQMP₂ transport complex of the ATP-binding cassette-type (ABC). Transcription of artJ is repressed by arginine repressor (ArgR) and the artPIQM operon is regulated by the transcriptional regulators ArgR and Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Whereas repression by ArgR requires arginine as corepressor, repression of P_artP by Lrp is partially counteracted by leucine, its major effector molecule. We demonstrate that binding of dimeric Lrp to the artP control region generates four complexes with a distinct migration velocity, and that leucine has an effect on both global binding affinity and cooperativity in the binding. We identify the binding sites for Lrp in the artP control region, reveal interferences in the binding of ArgR and Lrp in vitro and demonstrate that the two transcription factors act as competitive repressors in vivo, each one being a more potent regulator in the absence of the other. This competitive behavior may be explained by the partial steric overlap of their respective binding sites. Furthermore, we demonstrate ArgR binding to an unusual position in the control region of the lrp gene, downstream of the transcription initiation site. From this unusual position for an ArgR-specific operator, ArgR has little direct effect on lrp expression, but interferes with the negative leucine-sensitive autoregulation exerted by Lrp. Direct arginine and ArgR-dependent repression of lrp could be observed with a 25-bp deletion mutant, in which the ArgR binding site was artificially moved to a position immediately downstream of the lrp transcription initiation site. This finding is reminiscent of a previous observation made for the carAB operon encoding carbamoylphosphate synthase, where ArgR bound in overlap with the downstream promoter P2 does not block transcription initiated 67 bp upstream at the P1 promoter, and further supports the hypothesis that ArgR does not act as an efficient roadblock.

Regulation of carbamoylphosphate synthesis in Escherichia coli: an amazing metabolite at the crossroad of arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis

In all organisms, carbamoylphosphate (CP) is a precursor common to the synthesis of arginine and pyrimidines. In Escherichia coli and most other Gram-negative bacteria, CP is produced by a single enzyme, carbamoylphosphate synthase (CPSase), encoded by the carAB operon. This particular situation poses a question of basic physiological interest: what are the metabolic controls coordinating the synthesis and distribution of this high-energy substance in view of the needs of both pathways? The study of the mechanisms has revealed unexpected moonlighting gene regulatory activities of enzymes and functional links between mechanisms as diverse as gene regulation and site-specific DNA recombination. At the level of enzyme production, various regulatory mechanisms were found to cooperate in a particularly intricate transcriptional control of a pair of tandem promoters. Transcription initiation is modulated by an interplay of several allosteric DNA-binding transcription factors using effector molecules from three different pathways (arginine, pyrimidines, purines), nucleoid-associated factors (NAPs), trigger enzymes (enzymes with a second unlinked gene regulatory function), DNA remodeling (bending and wrapping), UTP-dependent reiterative transcription initiation, and stringent control by the alarmone ppGpp. At the enzyme level, CPSase activity is tightly controlled by allosteric effectors originating from different pathways: an inhibitor (UMP) and two activators (ornithine and IMP) that antagonize the inhibitory effect of UMP. Furthermore, it is worth noticing that all reaction intermediates in the production of CP are extremely reactive and unstable, and protected by tunneling through a 96 Å long internal channel.

Tyrosine binding and promiscuity in the arginine repressor from the pathogenic bacterium Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis

The arginine repressor (ArgR) regulates arginine biosynthesis in a number of microorganisms and consists of two domains interlinked by a short peptide; the N-terminal domain is involved in DNA binding and the C-terminal domain binds arginine and forms a hexamer made-up of a dimer of trimers. The crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of ArgR from the pathogenic Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis determined at 1.9 Å resolution contains a tightly bound tyrosine at the arginine-binding site indicating hitherto unobserved promiscuity. Structural analysis of the binding pocket displays clear molecular adaptations to accommodate tyrosine binding suggesting the possible existence of an alternative regulatory process in this pathogenic bacterium.

Biosynthesis of Arginine and Polyamines

Early investigations on arginine biosynthesis brought to light basic features of metabolic regulation. The most significant advances of the last 10 to 15 years concern the arginine repressor, its structure and mode of action in both E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, the sequence analysis of all arg structural genes in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, the resulting evolutionary inferences, and the dual regulation of the carAB operon. This review provides an overall picture of the pathways, their interconnections, the regulatory circuits involved, and the resulting interferences between arginine and polyamine biosynthesis. Carbamoylphosphate is a precursor common to arginine and the pyrimidines. In both Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, it is produced by a single synthetase, carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPSase), with glutamine as the physiological amino group donor. This situation contrasts with the existence of separate enzymes specific for arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis and fungi. Polyamine biosynthesis has been particularly well studied in E. coli, and the cognate genes have been identified in the Salmonella genome as well, including those involved in transport functions. The review summarizes what is known about the enzymes involved in the arginine pathway of E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium; homologous genes were identified in both organisms, except argF (encoding a supplementary OTCase), which is lacking in Salmonella. Several examples of putative enzyme recruitment (homologous enzymes performing analogous functions) are also presented.

The protein-DNA contacts in RutR•carAB operator complexes

Pyrimidine-specific regulation of the upstream carP1 promoter of the carbamoylphosphate synthase operon of Escherichia coli requires numerous trans-acting factors: the allosteric transcription regulator RutR, the nucleoid-associated protein integration host factor, and the trigger enzymes aminopeptidase A and PyrH (UMP-kinase). RutR, a TetR family member, binds far upstream of carP1. Here, we establish a high-resolution contact map of RutR•carP1 complexes for backbone and base-specific contacts, analyze DNA bending, determine the DNA sequence specificity of RutR binding by saturation mutagenesis, demonstrate that uracil but not thymine is the physiologically relevant ligand that inhibits the DNA binding capacity of RutR and build a model of the RutR·operator DNA complex based on the crystal structures of RutR and of the DNA-bound family member QacR. Finally, we test the validity of this model with site-directed mutagenesis of the helix–turn–helix DNA binding motif and in vitro binding studies with the cognate purified mutant RutR proteins.

Mutational analysis of intervening sequences connecting the binding sites for integration host factor, PepA, PurR, and RNA polymerase in the control region of the Escherichia coli carAB operon, encoding carbamoylphosphate synthase

Transcription of the carAB operon encoding the unique carbamoylphosphate synthase of Escherichia coli reflects the dual function of carbamoylphosphate in the biosynthesis of arginine and pyrimidine nucleotides. The tandem pair of promoters is regulated by various mechanisms depending on the needs of both pathways and the maintenance of a pyrimidine/purine nucleotide balance. Here we focus on the linker regions that impose the distribution of target sites for DNA-binding proteins involved in pyrimidine- and purine-specific repression of the upstream promoter P1. We introduced deletions and insertions, and combinations thereof, in four linkers connecting the binding sites for integration host factor (IHF), PepA, PurR, and RNA polymerase and studied the importance of phasing and spacing of the targets and the importance of the nucleotide sequence of the linkers. The two PepA binding sites must be properly aligned and separated with respect to each other and to the promoter for both pyrimidine- and purine-mediated repression. Similarly, the phasing and spacing of the IHF and PEPA2 sites are strictly constrained but only for pyrimidine-specific repression. The IHF target is even dispensable for purine-mediated regulation. Thus, a correct localization of PepA within the higher-order nucleoprotein complex is a prerequisite for the establishment of pyrimidine-mediated repression and for the coupling between purine- and pyrimidine-dependent regulation. Our data also suggest the existence of a novel cis-acting pyrimidine-specific regulatory target located around position -60. Finally, the analysis of a P1 derivative devoid of its control region has led to a reappraisal of the effect of excess adenine on P1 and has revealed that P1 has no need for a UP element.

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the arginine repressor of the hyperthermophile Thermotoga neapolitana

The arginine repressor of Thermotoga neapolitana (ArgRTnp) is a member of the family of multifunctional bacterial arginine repressors involved in the regulation of arginine metabolism. This hyperthermophilic repressor shows unique DNA-binding features that distinguish it from its homologues. ArgRTnp exists as a homotrimeric protein that assembles into hexamers at higher protein concentrations and/or in the presence of arginine. ArgRTnp was crystallized with and without its corepressor arginine using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method. Crystals of the aporepressor diffracted to a resolution of 2.1 A and belong to the orthorhombic P2(1)2(1)2(1) space group, with unit-cell parameters a = 117.73, b = 134.15, c = 139.31 A. Crystals of the repressor in the presence of its corepressor arginine diffracted to a resolution of 2.4 A and belong to the same space group, with similar unit-cell parameters.

Purine and pyrimidine-specific repression of the Escherichia coli carAB operon are functionally and structurally coupled

Transcription of the carAB operon encoding the sole carbamoylphosphate synthetase of Escherichia coli proceeds from a tandem pair of promoters. P2, downstream, is repressed by arginine and the ArgR protein, whereas P1 is submitted to pyrimidine-specific regulation and as shown here to purine-specific control exerted by binding of the PurR protein to a PUR box sequence centered around nucleotide -128.5 with respect to the start of P1 transcription. In vivo analyses of the effects of trans and cis-acting mutations on the regulatory responses and single round in vitro transcription assays indicated that ligand-bound PurR is by itself unable to inhibit P1 promoter activity. To exert its effect PurR relies on the elaborated nucleoprotein complex that governs P1 activity in a pyrimidine-specific manner. Thus we reveal the existence of an unprecedented functional and structural coupling between the modulation of P1 activity by purine and pyrimidine residues that appears to result from the unique position of the PUR box in the carAB control region, far upstream of the promoter. Missing contact and premethylation binding interference studies revealed the importance of base-specific groups and of structural aspects of the PUR box sequence in complex formation. Permutation assays indicated that the overall PurR-induced bending of the carAB control region is slightly less pronounced than that of the purF operator. The PUR boxes of the carAB operon of E.coli and Salmonella typhimurium are unique in that they have a guanine residue at position eight. Interestingly, guanine at this position has been proposed to be extremely unfavorable on the basis of modeling and binding studies, as its exocyclic amino group would enter into a steric clash with the side-chain of lysine 55. To analyze the effect of guanine at position eight in the upstream half-site of the carAB operator we constructed the adenine derivative and assayed in vivo repressibility of P1 promoter activity and in vitroPurR binding to the mutant operator, and constructed a molecular model for the unusual lysine 55-guanine 8 interaction.

Hyperthermophilic Thermotoga arginine repressor binding to full-length cognate and heterologous arginine operators and to half-site targets

The degree of sequence conservation of arginine repressor proteins (ArgR) and of the cognate operators (tandem pairs of 18 bp imperfect palindromes, ARG boxes) in evolutionarily distant bacteria is unusually high, and the global mechanism of ArgR-mediated regulation appears to be similar. However, here we demonstrate that the arginine repressor from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga neapolitana (ArgR(Tn)) exhibits characteristics that clearly distinguish this regulator from the well-studied homologues from Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and B.stearothermophilus. A high-resolution contact map of ArgR(Tn) binding to the operator of the biosynthetic argGHCJBD operon of Thermotoga maritima indicates that ArgR(Tn) establishes all of its strong contacts with a single ARG box-like sequence of the operator only. Protein array and electrophoretic mobility-shift data demonstrate that ArgR(Tn) has a remarkable capacity to bind to arginine operators from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and to single ARG box-bearing targets. Moreover, the overall effect of L-arginine on the apparent K(d) of ArgR(Tn) binding to various cognate and heterologous operator fragments was minor with respect to that observed with diverse bacterial arginine repressors. We demonstrate that this unusual behaviour for an ArgR protein can, to a large extent, be ascribed to the presence of a serine residue at position 107 of ArgR(Tn), instead of the highly conserved glutamine that is involved in arginine binding in the E.coli repressor. Consistent with these results, ArR(Tn) was found to behave as a superrepressor in E.coli, inhibiting growth in minimal medium, even supplemented with arginine, whereas similar constructs bearing the S107Q mutant allele did not inhibit growth. We assume that ArgR(Tn), owing to its broad target specificity and its ability to bind single ARG box sequences, might play a more general regulatory role in Thermotoga

Regulation of arginine biosynthesis in the psychropiezophilic bacterium Moritella profunda: in vivo repressibility and in vitro repressor-operator contact probing

We report the cloning of the arginine repressor gene from the psychropiezophilic Gram-negative bacterium Moritella profunda, the purification of its product (ArgR(Mp)), the identification of the operator in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon, in vivo repressibility studies, and an in vitro analysis of the repressor-operator interaction, including binding to mutant and heterologous arginine operators. The ArgR(Mp) subunit shows about 70% amino acid sequence identity with Escherichia coli ArgR (ArgR(Ec)). Binding of purified hexameric ArgR(Mp) to the control region of the divergent operon proved to be arginine-dependent, sequence-specific, and significantly more sensitive to heat than complex formation with ArgR(Ec). ArgR(Mp) binds E.coli arginine operators very efficiently, but hardly recognizes the operator from Bacillus stearothermophilus or Thermotoga maritima. ArgR(Mp) binds to a single site overlapping the -35 element of argC(P), but not argE(P). Therefore, the arrangement of promoter and operator sites in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon of M.profunda is very different from the organization of control elements in the bipolar argECBH operon of E.coli, where both promoters overlap the common operator and are equally repressible. We demonstrate that M.profunda argC(P) is about 44-fold repressible, whereas argE(P) is fully constitutive. A high-resolution contact map of the ArgR(Mp)-operator interaction was established by enzymatic and chemical footprinting, missing contact and base-specific premodification binding interference studies. The results indicate that the argC operator consists of two ARG box-like sequences (18bp imperfect palindromes) separated by 3bp. ArgR(Mp) binds to one face of the DNA helix and establishes contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove of each ARG box, whereas the minor groove segment facing the repressor at the center of the operator remains largely uncontacted. This pattern is reminiscent of complex formation with the repressors of E.coli and B.stearothermophilus, and suggests that each ARG box is contacted by two ArgR subunits belonging to opposite trimers. Moreover, the premodification interference patterns and mutant studies clearly indicate that the inner, center proximal halves of each ARG box in the M.profunda argC operator are more important for complex formation and repression than the outermost halves. A close inspection of sequence conservation and of single base-pair O(c)-type mutations indicate that the same conclusion can be generalized to E.coli operators.

Molecular analysis of tyrosine-and phenylalanine-mediated repression of the tyrB promoter by the TyrR protein of Escherichia coli

The mechanism of repression of the tyrB promoter by TyrR protein has been studied in vivo and in vitro. In tyrR+ strains, transcription of tyrB is repressed by either tyrosine or phenylalanine. Both of the TyrR binding sites (strong and weak TyrR boxes) lie downstream of the tyrB transcription start site and are required for tyrosine- or phenylalanine-mediated repression. Our results establish that the binding of the TyrR protein to the weak box, induced by cofactor tyrosine or phenylalanine, is critical for repression to occur. Neither the binding of the TyrR protein dimer formed in the presence of phenylalanine, nor the binding of the hexamer formed in the presence of tyrosine, blocks the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. Instead, open complex formation is inhibited in the presence of tyrosine whereas a step(s) following open complex formation is inhibited in the presence of phenylalanine. Moving the TyrR boxes 3 bp or more further away from the promoter affects tyrosine-mediated repression without affecting phenylalanine-mediated repression which remains unaltered until 6 bp are inserted between the TyrR boxes and the promoter. Analysis of deletion and insertion mutants fails to reveal any face of the helix specificity for either tyrosine- or phenylalanine-mediated repression.

Transcription regulation in thermophilic bacteria: high resolution contact probing of Bacillus stearothermophilus and Thermotoga neapolitana arginine repressor-operator interactions

Arginine-mediated regulation is remarkably well conserved in very divergent bacteria, and shows a number of unusual features that distinguish arginine regulation from other transcriptional control mechanisms. The arginine repressor subunit consists of a basic N-terminal DNA-binding domain, which belongs to the winged helix-turn-helix family, connected through a flexible linker to an acidic C-terminal domain responsible for binding of arginine and assembly of the high-affinity holohexamer, which binds an approximately 40 bp target. To gain further insight into the molecular details of arginine repressor-operator interactions we have established a high resolution contact map of the argC operator from Bacillus stearothermophilus, a moderate thermophilic Gram-positive bacterium, and the argR operator from Thermotoga neapolitana, a Gram-negative hyperthermophile, with the corresponding ArgR proteins. Enzymatic and chemical footprinting have been combined with missing contact, pre-modification, base substitution, and small ligand binding interference techniques to gather information on backbone and base-specific contacts with major and minor groove determinants of the operators. Wild-type and mutant argC operators have been compared for their interaction with the repressor, using both in vivo and in vitro approaches. Our results indicate that the operators of B. stearothermophilus and T. neapolitana consist of two ARG box-like sequences, 18 bp imperfect palindromes, separated by two and three base-pairs, respectively, and that the repressors from thermophilic origin establish base-specific contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove of each ARG box, all aligned on one face of the helix. In contrast, no specific contacts are established in the minor groove facing the repressor in the centre of the operator, nevertheless this region plays a crucial structural role in complex formation, as indicated by mutant studies. This picture is reminiscent of arginine repressor binding in Escherichia coli, and therefore reinforces the uniform view of arginine regulation, but also reveals a number of striking differences at particular positions of the boxes and in the length and base-pair composition of the spacer connecting two ARG boxes in the operator. These might be responsible, in part, for subtle but important functional and mechanistic differences in the way species-specific repressors interact with their cognate target sites. These variations are underlined by the different behaviour of the repressors from E. coli, B. stearothermophilus and T. neapolitana in their potential to bind heterologous operators, their requirement for arginine, and the resistance of complex formation to non-specific competitor DNA. Our findings are discussed in view of the crystal structure of the arginine repressor from B. stearothermophilus.

Mutational analysis of Escherichia coli PepA, a multifunctional DNA-binding aminopeptidase

Escherichia coli PepA is a hexameric aminopeptidase that is also endowed with a DNA-binding activity that functions in transcription control and plasmid dimer resolution. To gain further insight into the functioning of PepA, mutants were selected on the basis of reduced repressibility of a genomic carA-lacZ fusion and studied for the various cellular processes requiring PepA, i.e. repression of the carAB operon, autoregulation, resolution of ColE1 multimers, and peptide proteolysis. The methylation status of the carAB control region was analysed in several pepA mutants and purified proteins were assayed in vitro for car operator DNA binding. This study provides a critical test of predictions advanced on the basis of the structural analysis of PepA and demonstrates the importance for DNA binding of several secondary structural elements in the N-terminal domain and near the very C terminus. By analysis of single amino acid substitutions, we could distinguish the mode of PepA action in car regulation from its action in plasmid resolution. We demonstrate that mere binding of PepA to the car control region is not sufficient to explain its role in pyrimidine-specific regulation; protein-protein interactions appear to play an important role in transcriptional repression. The multifunctional character of PepA and of an increasing number of transcriptional regulators that combine catalytic and regulatory properties, of which several participate in the metabolism of arginine and of the pyrimidines, suggests that enzymes and DNA (RNA) binding proteins fulfilling an essential primeval function may have been recruited in evolution to fulfil an additional regulatory task.

Web-based visualization tools for bacterial genome alignments

With the increase in the flow of sequence data, both in contigs and whole genomes, visual aids for comparison and analysis studies are becoming imperative. We describe three web-based tools for visualizing alignments of bacterial genomes. The first, called Enteric, produces a graphical, hypertext view of pairwise alignments between a reference genome and sequences from each of several related organisms, covering 20 kb around a user-specified position. Insertions, deletions and rearrangements relative to the reference genome are color-coded, which reveals many intriguing differences among genomes. The second, Menteric, computes and displays nucleotide-level multiple alignments of the same sequences, together with annotations of ORFs and regulatory sites, in a 1 kb region surrounding a given address. The third, a Java-based viewer called Maj, combines some features of the previous tools, and adds a zoom-in mechanism. We compare the Escherichia coli K-12 genome with the partially sequenced genomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Yersinia pestis, Vibrio cholerae, and the Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Typhi and Paratyphi A. Examination of the pairwise and multiple alignments in a region allows one to draw inferences about regulatory patterns and functional assignments. For example, these tools revealed that rffH, a gene involved in enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) biosynthesis, is partly deleted in one of the genomes. We used PCR to show that this deletion occurs sporadically in some strains of some serovars of S.enterica subspecies I but not in any strains tested from six other subspecies. The resulting cell surface diversity may be associated with selection by the host immune response.

Serine 948 and threonine 1042 are crucial residues for allosteric regulation of Escherichia coli carbamoylphosphate synthetase and illustrate coupling effects of activation and inhibition pathways

Escherichia coli carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPSase) is a key enzyme in the pyrimidine nucleotides and arginine biosynthetic pathways. The enzyme harbors a complex regulation, being activated by ornithine and inosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP), and inhibited by UMP. CPSase mutants obtained by in vivo mutagenesis and selected on the basis of particular phenotypes have been characterized kinetically. Two residues, serine 948 and threonine 1042, appear crucial for allosteric regulation of CPSase. When threonine 1042 is replaced by an isoleucine residue, the enzyme displays a greatly reduced activation by ornithine. The T1042I mutated enzyme is still sensitive to UMP and IMP, although the effects of both regulators are reduced. When serine 948 is replaced by phenylalanine, the enzyme becomes insensitive to UMP and IMP, but is still activated by ornithine, although to a reduced extent. When correlating these observations to the structural data recently reported, it becomes clear that both mutations, which are located in spatially distinct regions corresponding respectively to the ornithine and the UMP/IMP binding sites, have coupled effects on the enzyme regulation. These results provide an illustration that coupling of regulatory pathways occurs within the allosteric subunit of E. coli CPSase. In addition, other mutants have been characterized, which display altered affinities for the different CPSase substrates and also slightly modified properties towards the allosteric effectors: P165S, P170L, A182V, P360L, S743N, T800F and G824D. Kinetic properties of these modified enzymes are also presented here and correlated to the crystal structure of E. coli CPSase and to the phenotype of the mutants.

pyrH-encoded UMP-kinase directly participates in pyrimidine-specific modulation of promoter activity in Escherichia coli

The carAB operon of the enterics Escherichia coli K-12 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2, encoding the sole carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPSase) of these organisms, is transcribed from two promoters in tandem, carP1 upstream and carP2 downstream, repressed respectively by pyrimidines and arginine. We present evidence that the pyrH gene product (the hexameric UMP-kinase) directly participates in the pyrimidine-specific control of carP1 activity. Indeed, we have isolated in E. coli a particular type of pyrH mutation (pyrH41) that retains a quasi-normal UMP-kinase activity, but yet is impaired in the pyrimidine-specific repression of the P1 promoter of the carAB operon of E. coli and of S. typhimurium. Moreover, the pyrimidine-dependent inhibition of in vivo Dam methylase modification of adenine -106 upstream of the carP1 promoter is altered in this pyrH mutant. The recessive pyrH41 allele bears a single C-G to A-T transversion that converts alanine 94 into glutamic acid (A94E). Although overexpression of pyrH41 results in UMP-kinase levels far above that of a wild-type strain, pyrimidine-specific repression of the carAB operon is not restored under these conditions. Similarly, overexpression of the UMP-CMP-kinase gene of Dictyostelium discoideum in the pyrH41 mutant does not restore pyrimidine-mediated control of carP1 promoter activity, in spite of the elevated UMP-kinase activity measured in such transformants. These results indicate that besides its catalytic function in the de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis, E. coli UMP-kinase fulfils an additional, but previously unrecognized role in the regulation of the carAB operon. UMP-kinase might function as the real sensor of the internal pyrimidine nucleotide pool and act in concert with the integration host factor (IHF) and aminopeptidase A (PepA alias CarP and XerB) in the elaboration of the complex nucleoprotein structure required for pyrimidine-specific repression of carP1 promoter activity.

The arginine repressor of Escherichia coli K-12 makes direct contacts to minor and major groove determinants of the operators

In order to gain further insight into the molecular mechanism of arginine-dependent operator recognition by the hexameric Escherichia coli arginine repressor we have probed protein-DNA interactions in vitro and in vivo. We have extensively applied the chemical modification-protection and premodification-interference approach to two operators, the natural operator overlapping the P2 promoter of the carAB operon and a fully symmetrical consensus sequence. Backbone contacts were revealed by hydroxyl radical footprinting and phosphate ethylation interference. Base-specific contacts to purines and pyrimidines were revealed by methylation protection and premodification interference, KMnO4 and NH2OH.HCl-specific modification of thymine and cytosine residues, base-removal (depurination and depyrimidation), and base substitution (uracil and inosine). Additional information on the groove specificity of repressor binding was obtained by small ligand binding interference (distamycin and methyl green). In vivo, we measured the effects on the repressibility of 24 single base-pair substitutions obtained by saturation mutagenesis of half an Arg box in the carAB operator. The results of these experiments point to the conclusion that a hexameric arginine repressor molecule covers four turns of the helix, makes base-specific contacts to at least one guanine (G4 or G4') and two thymine (T3, T13', or T3', T13) residues in each one of four consecutive major grooves on one face of the helix and with four A-T/T-A base-pairs, comprising the adenine residues A9, 9', 12, 12' and the thymine residues T10, 10', 11, 11', in the two outermost minor grooves of the operator, on the very same face of the DNA molecule. The hydrophobic 5-methyl groups of four thymine residues (T3, 3', 13, 13') in each Arg box contribute to major groove-specific recognition via hydrophobic and/or van der Waals interactions. The importance of minor groove contacts was further supported by the drastic effect of distamycin binding interference. In vivo, the most pronounced drops in repressibility were occasioned by mutations at positions 10 (A-->G or C), 11 (T-->A or G) and 12 (A-->G, T or C).

On the role of the Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) in repression at a distance of the pyrimidine specific promoter P1 of the carAB operon

Binding of integration host factor to its target site, centered around nucleotide -305 upstream of the transcription startpoint, exerts antagonistic effects on the expression of P1, the upstream pyrimidine specific promoter of the E coli and S typhimurium carAB operons. IHF stimulates P1 promoter activity in minimal medium, but also increases the repressibility of this promoter by pyrimidines. We present evidence strongly suggesting that IHF exerts these effects by modulating the binding of another pyrimidine specific regulatory molecule, probably the product of gene carP. The carAB control region contains a GATC Dam methylation site, 106 bp upstream of the P1 transcription startpoint, which can be protected in vivo against methylation. This protection requires at least the regulatory carP gene product and a high pyrimidine nucleotide pool and, as shown here, the integration host factor. Whether CarP directly binds to this site or exerts its protective effect indirectly is not yet known. In the absence of IHF (himA) or in mutants affected in the IHF target site this protection is strongly impaired, suggesting that IHF positively influences the formation or the stability of the protective protein-DNA complex some 200 bp downstream. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that the distance separating the IHF and GATC Dam methylase target sites is crucial for the in vivo protection and for pyrimidine mediated regulation of P1 promoter expression. Indeed, shortening this distance by 6 bp, and more surprisingly also by 11 bp, results in a severe reduction of the degree of in vivo protection of the GATC site against methylation and concomitantly of the repressibility by pyrimidines of P1 promoter activity. The absence of both these effects in a double, deletion-duplication, mutant resulting in a net increase of the intervening sequence by 1 bp, clearly demonstrates that these effects are not due to the disruption of an important regulatory site, but must be attributed to variations in the distance separating different protein binding sites.

Integration host factor (IHF) modulates the expression of the pyrimidine-specific promoter of the carAB operons of Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2

We report the identification of Integration Host Factor (IHF) as a new element involved in modulation of P1, the upstream pyrimidine-specific promoter of the Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium carAB operons. Band-shift assays, performed with S-30 extracts of the wild type and a himA, hip double mutant or with purified IHF demonstrate that, in vitro, this factor binds to a region 300 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site of P1 in both organisms. This was confirmed by deletion analysis of the target site. DNase I, hydroxyl radical and dimethylsulphate footprinting experiments allowed us to allocate the IHF binding site to a 38 bp, highly A+T-rich stretch, centred around nucleotide -305 upstream of the transcription initiation site. Protein-DNA contacts are apparently spread over a large number of bases and are mainly located in the minor groove of the helix. Measurements of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase (CPSase) and beta-galactosidase specific activities from car-lacZ fusion constructs of wild type or IHF target site mutants introduced into several genetic backgrounds affected in the himA gene or in the pyrimidine-mediated control of P1 (carP6 or pyrH+/-), or in both, indicate that, in vivo, IHF influences P1 activity as well as its control by pyrimidines. IHF stimulates P1 promoter activity in minimal medium, but increases the repressibility of this promoter by pyrimidines. These antagonistic effects result in a two- to threefold reduction in the repressibility of promoter P1 by pyrimidines in the absence of IHF binding. IHF thus appears to be required for maximal expression as well as for establishment of full repression. IHF could exert this function by modulating the binding of a pyrimidine-specific regulatory molecule.

Arginine regulon of Escherichia coli K-12. A study of repressor-operator interactions and of in vitro binding affinities versus in vivo repression

The 12 genes which in E. coli K-12 constitute the arginine regulon are organized in nine transcriptional units all of which contain in their 5' non-coding region two 18 bp partially conserved imperfect palindromes (ARG boxes) which are the target sites for binding of the repressor, a hexameric protein. In vitro binding experiments with purified repressor (a gift from W. K. Maas) were performed on the operator sites of four genes, argA, argD, argF, argG, and of two operons, carAb and the bipolar argECBH cluster. A compilation of results obtained by DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting clearly indicates that in each case the repressor binds symmetrically to four helical turns covering adjacent pairs of boxes separated by 3 bp, but to one face of the DNA only. Methylation protection experiments bring to light major base contacts with four highly conserved G residues symmetrically distributed in four consecutive major grooves. Symmetrical contacts in the minor groove with A residues have also been identified. Stoichiometry experiments suggest that a single hexameric repressor molecule binds to a pair of adjacent ARG boxes. Although the wild-type operator consists of a pair of adjacent ARG boxes separated by 3 bp (except argR where there are only 2 bp), repressor can bind to a single box but with a greatly reduced affinity. Therefore, adjacent boxes behave co-operatively with respect to the Arg repressor binding, in the sense that the presence of one box largely stimulates the binding of the properly located second box. The optimal distance separating two boxes is 3 bp, but one bp more or less does not abolish this stimulation effect. However, it is completely abolished by the introduction of two or more additional bp unless a full helical turn is introduced. Large variations in the in vivo repression response between individual arginine genes or a wild-type gene and cognate Oc type mutants are not reflected by similar differences in the in vitro binding results where only small differences are observed. The significance of this lack of correlation is discussed.

Control site location and transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli

The regulatory regions for 119 Escherichia coli promoters have been analyzed, and the locations of the regulatory sites have been cataloged. The following observations emerge. (i) More than 95% of promoters are coregulated with at least one other promoter. (ii) Virtually all sigma 70 promoters contain at least one regulatory site in a proximal position, touching at least position -65 with respect to the start point of transcription. There are not yet clear examples of upstream regulation in the absence of a proximal site. (iii) Operators within regulons appear in very variable proximal positions. By contrast, the proximal activation sites of regulons are much more fixed. (iv) There is a forbidden zone for activation elements downstream from approximately position -20 with respect to the start of transcription. By contrast, operators can occur throughout the proximal region. When activation elements appear in the forbidden zone, they repress. These latter examples usually involve autoregulation. (v) Approximately 40% of repressible promoters contain operator duplications. These occur either in certain regulons where duplication appears to be a requirement for repressor action or in promoters subject to complex regulation. (vi) Remote operator duplications occur in approximately 10% of repressible promoters. They generally appear when a multiple promoter region is coregulated by cyclic AMP receptor protein. (vii) Sigma 54 promoters do not require proximal or precisely positioned activator elements and are not generally subject to negative regulation. Rationales are presented for all of the above observations.

Pyrimidine regulation of tandem promoters for carAB in Salmonella typhimurium

The carAB operon of Salmonella typhimurium encodes the two subunits of the enzyme carbamoylphosphate synthetase. Transcription of the operon is initiated at tandem promoters that are subject to control by pyrimidines and arginine. Pyrimidine regulation was examined by quantitative primer extension experiments under conditions in which densitometric measurements of the transcripts were linear with the amount of RNA. RNA was obtained from mutant strains that permit manipulations of pyrimidine nucleotide pools. The data showed that a uridine nucleotide repressed the upstream promoter (Pl), whereas arginine repressed the downstream promoter (P2). Exogenous cytidine, which increased the intracellular CTP pool in certain mutant strains, did not affect either promoter. However, CTP limitation resulted in derepression of the pyrimidine-specific promoter as well as the downstream arginine-specific promoter. The effect of pyrimidines on P2 was confirmed in a carA::lacZ transcriptional fusion in which the activity of the pyrimidine-specific promoter was abolished. Primer extension experiments with an argR::Tn10 derivative showed that repression of Pl by uridine nucleotides did not require a functional arginine repressor and that repression of P2 by arginine did not interfere with elongation of transcripts initiated at the upstream Pl promoter.

carP, a novel gene regulating the transcription of the carbamoylphosphate synthetase operon of Escherichia coli

The carAB operon, encoding carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPSase; EC 6.3.5.5) is transcribed from two tandem promoters. The upstream promoter (P1) is controlled by pyrimidines and the downstream promoter (P2) is controlled by arginine. We have isolated a new type of constitutive mutation (carP) that specifically affects the control of the pyrimidine-sensitive promoter but does not appear to influence other genes of the pyrimidine pathway. The carP mutation acts in trans and is dominant, which suggests that the carP product is an activator of car transcription. The downstream promoter P2, which is repressed by arginine, overlaps two operator modules characteristic of the arginine regulon. We have isolated two operator-constitutive mutations that specifically affect P2; both map in the upstream ARG box at a strongly conserved position.

On the role of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence in determining the efficiency of translation initiation at a weak start codon in the car operon of Escherichia coli K12

Translation of the carA gene is efficiently initiated at the intrinsically weak UUG codon. A single nucleotide substitution changing the Shine-Dalgarno box of carA (GGAGG) into the sequence TGAGG reduces translation of carA sevenfold. This result supports the view that extensive complementarity between the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and 16S RNA contributes significantly to the efficiency of translation when the latter starts at a weak initiation triplet.