Biometric comparison of bur and electrosurgical retraction methods

Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques

The clinical success and longevity of indirect restorations depend on the careful and accurate completion of several procedures. One of the challenging procedures is management of the gingival tissues and gingival esthetics. The goal for management of gingival tissues and gingival esthetics is to maintain the normal appearance of healthy gingival. Achieving this goal requires optimal health before treatment and minimal trauma during treatment. The best way of optimizing health and minimizing trauma is to avoid contacting the gingiva with restorative materials.

Electrosurgery--a biological approach

Electrosurgery has been used in dentistry for more than 50 years. Both opponents and advocates of electrosurgery have presented a variety of clinical studies in favour of their respective opinions, which are discussed in the following review. In some studies, wounds created by electrosurgical techniques were observed through the healing stages, in comparison to those following incision by a surgical blade, with no significant difference being discovered. Other studies reported that the histologic response of oral connective tissue to electrosurgery was adverse in some animal and human models. However, neither of these groups used methods that allowed documentation or control of operating variables. A critical evaluation of controlled clinical studies shows that adverse responses of (connective) tissue, epithelium, bone, cementum, and periodontal attachment are related to an excessive lateral heat production during the procedure. With electrosurgery, the clinician can control the inherent variables. Waveform, frequency, size of the electrode, time of contact and cooling periods are some of those considered to be of importance in the studies. On the basis of the research reports, clinical guidelines have been developed to give practical advice to the clinician using electrosurgery. Providing that these safeguards are adhered to, scientific evidence supports the biological compatibility of electrosurgery for intraoral surgical procedures.

Report of Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

A few personal points seem appropriate in summary. It is axiomatic that while research solves problems, it also creates them. As an example, it is an accepted fact that dentistry more than any other profession has made serious inroads into putting itself out of business through research. Each year this report takes note of the reduction in dental caries in children, which has thus triggered a change in the nature of general practice. Be this as it may, it is well to acknowledge that major dental diseases are not disappearing, but their patterns in the population are changing, accompanied by an expansion of other services. Despite the optimistic picture painted earlier in this report, it is grossly premature to acclaim the elimination of caries, and thereby a significant segment of restorative dentistry. Of course the younger age groups have been the major beneficiaries of caries reduction. As the child ages from 9 to 16 years, the percentage of mouths free of caries drops by one half. In addition, the disease pattern in the adult population is being altered because of a longer life span and loss of fewer teeth. Unquestionably what we will, and are already seeing, is not an elimination of restorative dentistry but a different target and changes in procedures because of new materials, therapy, and expanded scope of services. There is yet another subtle change in the trend of dental research and it deals with the reduction in the number of dental schools worldwide and smaller class sizes in those schools. Dental research thereby suffers because of the traditional link between education and research. Thus the potential pool of researchers becomes smaller and research monies for training programs for dental investigators, particularly in clinical research, decreases. This year a surprising number of articles are concerned with manpower as it relates to research priorities. So, it is indeed a time that both the profession and the scientific community find filled with controversy and frustration. Yet never has there been a time that offers more in challenges and rewards.