Urinary amylase monitoring for early diagnosis of pancreas allograft rejection in dogs

Monitoring of Pancreatic Graft Perfusion by First Passage Radionuclide Angiography

The perfusion of two pancreatic transplants were examined three times a week for the first five postoperative weeks by intravenous angiography using 99Tcm-pertechnetate. Worsening of the perfusion always preceded or was associated with deterioration of the pancreatic function. Accordingly, radionuclide angiography may have an important place in the systematic monitoring of pancreatic transplants in the critical postoperative period.

Pancreas transplantation

SPK transplant is the definitive treatment of type 1 diabetes combined with end-stage renal disease. Long-term graft function can lead to improvement in diabetes-related complications and, in patients younger than 50 years, can lead to improved overall survival. PAK transplant and PA transplant do not result in similar improvements in patient survival, but with appropriate patient selection, they can improve quality of life by rendering patients insulin-free. Pancreas transplant is associated with more surgical complications and higher perioperative morbidity and mortality than KTA. Therefore, careful donor and recipient selection along with meticulous surgical technique are mandatory for optimal outcomes.

Current status of pancreas transplantation

Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage diabetes mellitus. Over the last four decades, many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, which contributed to increased number of indications and improved allograft survival. Pancreas transplantation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure with a relatively higher complication rate, and lifelong immunosuppression. Therefore, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy such as islet transplantation have been in progress. This article summarizes the current understanding of pancreas transplantation-associated indications, donor selection, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and rejection.

Pancreas transplantation

Diabetes mellitus is generally treated with oral diabetic drugs and/or insulin. However, the morbidity and mortality associated with this condition increases over time, even in patients receiving intensive insulin treatment, and this is largely attributable to diabetic complications or the insulin therapy itself. Pancreas transplantation in humans was first conducted in 1966, since when there has been much debate regarding the legitimacy of this procedure. Technical refinements and the development of better immunosuppressants and better postoperative care have brought about marked improvements in patient and graft survival and a reduction in postoperative morbidity. Consequently, pancreas transplantation has become the curative treatment modality for diabetes, particularly for type I diabetes. An overview of pancreas transplantation is provided herein, covering the history of pancreas transplantation, indications for transplantation, cadaveric and living donors, surgical techniques, immunosuppressants, and outcome following pancreas transplantation. The impact of successful pancreas transplantation on the complications of diabetes will also be reviewed briefly.

Pancreas transplantation

Since the introduction of pancreas transplantation more than 40 years ago, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy have been in progress, yet this surgical procedure still remains the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, both of which have contributed to an increasing number of indications for pancreas transplantation. This operation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure and lifelong immunosuppression. The various indications, categories, and outcomes of patients having a pancreas transplant are discussed, particularly with reference to the effect on long-term diabetic complications.

Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants.

METHODS

From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA.

RESULTS

Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant rejection: separate or synchronous events?

The results of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) cannot be matched by pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), in part because an independent diagnosis of pancreas graft rejection remains difficult. The relationship between rejection of the pancreas and rejection of the kidney is poorly understood, and it is not known whether simultaneous transplantation of both organs confers true protection to either graft. To study these questions, reliable canine allotransplant models of kidney transplantation alone (KTA), PTA, and SPK were established. Sixty-seven mongrel dogs received KTA (n=21), PTA (n=23), or SPK (n=23) with either no immunosuppression, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression, or high-dose CsA-based immunosuppression. Needle core biopsy (NCB) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were performed at 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 21, and 30 days or at the time of graft failure. Pancreas and kidney graft survival after SPK was significantly shorter in dogs given low-dose CsA than in dogs given high-dose CsA (pancreas, P<0.04; kidney, P<0.03). Concurrent NCBs and FNABs were performed on 227 occasions in pancreas grafts and 229 occasions in kidney grafts. The time to initial evidence of rejection by NCB was not different in any immunosuppressed group. Synchronous rejection occurred in 73% of immunosuppressed SPK biopsies. Kidney-only rejection occurred in 23% of biopsies and pancreas-only rejection occurred in only 3% after SPK. All markers of pancreas graft rejection were poor, with the most sensitive being NCB of the simultaneously transplanted kidney. In summary, recipients of SPK required more immunosuppression than recipients of PTA, and improved PTA survival should be achievable with more sensitive markers of rejection. Markers of kidney rejection were the most sensitive indicators of pancreas rejection, and independent pancreas rejection was uncommon after SPK.

Equivalent success of simultaneous pancreas kidney and solitary pancreas transplantation. A prospective trial of tacrolimus immunosuppression with percutaneous biopsy

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate the results of solitary pancreas transplantation in a protocol that uses the new immunosuppressant tacrolimus (FK) and liberally applies ultrasound-guided percutaneous pancreas biopsy to diagnose rejection.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Pancreas graft survival in patients who simultaneously receive a kidney transplant (SPK) historically has been 75% to 90% at 1 year, approaching that of cadaveric kidney transplantations. In sharp contrast, graft survival rates in patients who receive a pancreas atone (PA) have remained static over the past decade, with approximately 50% functional at 1 year. It was hypothesized that the results of PA transplantations would improve with newer maintenance immunosuppressants and biopsy techniques.

METHODS

Twenty-seven PA recipients prospectively were treated with FK-based immunosuppression (PA-FK). Percutaneous biopsy was performed for hyperamylasemia, hyperlipasemia, hypoamylasuria, or unexplained fever. One year pancreas graft survival in these patients was compared to 15 cyclosporine treated PA cases (PA-CsA) and 113 SPK recipients.

RESULTS

The 1-year pancreas graft survival rate of 90.1% in technically successful PA-FK patients was significantly better than the 53.4% rate in PA-CsA recipients (p = 0.002) and no different than the 87.4% rate in SPK recipients. The only graft lost to acute rejection in the PA-FK group was because of acknowledged patient noncompliance. Percutaneous biopsy substantially improved the diagnostic certainty in cases of suspected rejection and was associated with a low complication rate (3/178 = 1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Modern immunosuppression and biopsy techniques have improved the success of solitary pancreas transplantations to the point where outcome is now equivalent to that of SPKs.

Correlation between cystoscopic biopsy results and hypoamylasuria in bladder-drained pancreas transplants

BACKGROUND

Urinary amylase (UA) remains the most common biochemical parameter to detect rejection in bladder-drained pancreas allografts. With the development of the cystoscopic transduodenal pancreas transplant biopsy technique, tissue samples of the pancreas graft are now frequently obtained. A definitive correlative analysis between UA activity and biopsy results has not been done in the three different pancreas transplant categories (simultaneous pancreas-kidney, pancreas transplant alone, and pancreas after kidney).

METHODS

We studied 66 pancreaticoduodenal biopsy specimens obtained for hypoamylasuria. Rejection was defined as a greater than 25% decrease from stable posttransplantation baseline on two consecutive measurements at least 12 hours apart. To perform biopsies we used our newly developed 14- and 16-gauge core-cut needles (50 cm long). Biopsy specimens were considered positive if either pancreatic or duodenal rejection was found. To assess the quality of UA activity we studied 13 biopsy specimens from patients with stable UA levels; these 13 specimens were negative for rejection.

RESULTS

Acute rejection was diagnosed in 36 biopsy specimens (55%). The mean decrease in UA levels was 67% +/- 8% (range, 28% to 99%) for the positive biopsy results, and 57% +/- 16% (range, 22% to 92%) for the negative biopsy results (p = 0.147). Within 1 month, UA levels returned to baseline in 19% of our patients with positive biopsy results versus 97% with negative results; postbiopsy 1-year graft survival was 64% versus 97% (p < or = 0.05). In assessing the test quality of our biopsy specimens (including 13 obtained for reasons other than hypoamylasuria), we found a sensitivity of 100% (stable UA levels mean no rejection) and a specificity of 30%. The predictive value of a positive test was 53%; of a negative test it was 100%. By performing biopsies we avoided antirejection treatment in 47% of the patients studied. We found no biopsy-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Stable UA levels reliably rule out rejection; a decrease is a marker for acute rejection but is unspecific. Performing biopsy is currently the only way to reliably diagnose rejection in solitary pancreas recipients (pancreas transplant alone and pancreas after kidney) and in simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients with isolated hypoamylasuria. The procedure is safe and should always be attempted to avoid unnecessary rejection treatment.

Pancreas-kidney transplantation for intensivists: perioperative care and complications

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is a therapeutic option for type I diabetics with end-stage renal disease. It aims to correct the uremic state, to normalize glucose hemeostasis, and to ameliorate diabetic complications. Careful donor-recipient selection and meticulous intra-operative and postoperative care will substantially impact recipient morbidity. An understanding of the technical aspects of the surgical procedure and its metabolic and immunological consequences is necessary to successfully manage a pancreas-kidney transplant recipient, many of whom are nursed in intensive care units. A successful outcome is predicted in early recognition of technical complications and aggressive management of rejection to achieve the current 1-year graft survival rates of 75% for pancreas transplants and 84% for kidney transplants.

Evolution of kidney, pancreas, and islet transplantation for patients with diabetes at the University of Minnesota

Transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1963. Treatment of diabetes and its complications has been emphasized since 1966, when the first pancreas-kidney transplant was done. Of 3,640 kidneys transplanted by 1992, 1,373 were for diabetic recipients, including 658 from living donors and 715 from cadaver donors. The results progressively improved; since 1984, survival rates of kidney grafts have been similar for diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, with three fourths of the grafts functioning at 4 years. As of 1992, 501 pancreas transplants had been done, including 170 simultaneous with a kidney, 142 after a kidney, and 188 alone for nonuremic diabetic patients; again, the results have improved: by the 1990s, graft survival rates were similar in the 3 recipient categories. Successful pancreas transplants have been shown by our coworkers to stabilize or improve neuropathy and prevent recurrence of diabetic nephropathy in kidney grafts. In an attempt to simplify endocrine replacement therapy, we have done 63 human islet transplants, 34 as allografts for patients with type I diabetes and 29 as autografts after total pancreatectomy to treat chronic pancreatitis. Insulin independence occurs for about 50% of islet autograft recipients. Two recent islet allograft recipients treated with 15-deoxyspergualin have had sustained insulin independence. We anticipate that endocrine replacement therapy by transplantation will become routine for diabetic patients as methods to prevent rejection are refined.

Gross hematuria following combined kidney-pancreas transplantation with pancreaticocystostomy

We report on a 46-year-old man who presented with gross hematuria 3 months after combined kidney and pancreas transplantation with pancreaticocystostomy. There are few reported urological complications from this procedure and this operative technique adds to the differential diagnosis of hematuria in the post-transplant patient.

Evolution of synchronous renal and pancreatic transplantation

The utilization of pancreatic transplantation as a therapeutic option in type I diabetics is dependent on demonstrating its safety and efficacy. A protocol for synchronous renal and segmental pancreatic transplantation, utilizing pancreaticocystostomy, was initiated in February 1985, and through December 1988, 44 patients (mean age 34.8 years) received dual allografts. At last follow-up, 25 patients had functioning kidneys, and 17 patients were insulin independent 4 to 50 months after transplantation, with a mean fasting blood glucose level of 86 mg/100 ml. As our experience increased, three factors were identified as reducing pancreatic allograft and patient survival: vascular thrombosis, inadequate control of pancreatic secretions, and coronary artery disease. As a result, our protocol was modified to include postoperative heparin, external stenting of the pancreaticocystostomy, and dipyridamole thallium testing to screen for coronary artery disease. With these modifications, technical failures and postoperative morbidity were reduced with a resultant increase in 6-month graft and patient survival. These results provide impetus for considering synchronous renal and pancreatic transplantation as a therapeutic option for type I diabetics with end-stage renal disease.

Canine whole pancreatic transplantation with exocrine drainage into the bladder

A canine model of whole pancreas transplantation with pancreaticocystostomy was studied for reproducibility and long-term graft function with oral cyclosporine. The feasibility of the operative technique was established in three dogs and the graft histology at 5 days was studied. Seven pancreatectomized dogs were transplanted without immunosuppression; acute rejection was evident at a median of 10 days (range: 7-12 days). Another 14 non-pancreatectomized dogs were given oral cyclosporine (25 mg/kg per day) resulting in prolonged graft survival (P less than 0.01) with a median (actuarial) survival of 91 days (range: 8-159 days); five dogs had vascular thrombosis or graft rejection and eight dogs died with functioning grafts. Early technical loss in two dogs (8.3%) was due to arterial thrombosis. It is concluded that the model of whole pancreas transplantation was reproducible in dogs, that long-term graft function can be achieved on oral cyclosporine, and that duct patency can be maintained. Graft infarction, either primary or due to rejection, continues to complicate this model of pancreas transplantation.

Monitoring of canine pancreas allograft function with measurements of urinary amylase

A canine model of whole pancreas transplantation with pancreaticocystostomy was studied for predictability of graft rejection using urinary amylase (UA) monitoring. Six pancreatectomized dogs were transplanted without immunosuppression and with acute rejection occurring at a median of 9.5 days (range 7-12 days). A differential loss of allograft exocrine and endocrine function was demonstrated, with a gradual decrease in UA after transplantation but maintenance of fasting blood glucose levels (FBGL) till the day before complete loss of graft structure. Another 13 dogs treated with cyclosporin (25 mg/kg per day) had prolonged graft survival (P less than 0.01) with an actuarial median survival of 91 days (range 8-159 days). Five allografts were lost because of rejection and eight dogs died with functioning grafts. Fasting spot levels of UA less than 5000 iu/l or less than 10,000 iu/l had a positive predictivity of graft failure of 71% or 31%, respectively. Falls of UA levels of greater than 75% in 24 h and 48 h were seen equally in both rejecting and functioning allografts. This study confirmed the role of UA as an earlier marker of rejection than FBGL. The clinical role of UA will be important, but its use as a predictor of pancreas rejection may be dependent on a fall to a predetermined level rather than the rate of fall.

Canine pancreaticoduodenal autotransplantation: a preparation for human pancreatic transplantation

This canine pancreaticodunodenal autotransplantation model includes virtually the entire pancreas attached to a duodenal cuff (second portion). The blood supply is based on the superior pancreaticoduodenal artery and the venous outflow on the gastroduodenal vein. The vascular anastomoses are end-to-side to the external iliac artery and vein. Exocrine drainage is channeled through the bladder from the transplanted duodenum. This technique closely resembles whole-organ pancreas transplant in humans with a cystoduodenostomy. The bowel reconstruction consists of a Billroth I gastroduodenostomy and a cholecystoduodenostomy. The entire procedure is relatively free of major complications and may be performed in less than 4 hours.

Pancreas transplantation

The number of pancreas transplants being performed and the success rate have continued to increase. Most pancreas transplants have been placed in diabetic recipients of kidney transplants, but application to nonuremic, non-kidney transplant recipients without end-stage disease is increasing. Drainage of pancreatic graft duct into the bladder allows exocrine function to be assessed directly and has led to earlier diagnosis and treatment of rejection episodes. The improvement in graft survival rates has been associated with the use of cyclosporine in combination with other immunosuppressants. The effect that establishment of a euglycemic state by successful pancreas transplantation has on the specific complications of diabetes is just beginning to be discerned but appears to be favorable if the transplant is performed sufficiently early in the course of the disease.