Does carnitine have a role in fat absorption?

Fatty acid metabolism and colon cancer protection by dietary methyl donor restriction

INTRODUCTION

A methyl donor depleted (MDD) diet dramatically suppresses intestinal tumor development in Apc-mutant mice, but the mechanism of this prevention is not entirely clear.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to gain insight into the mechanisms of cancer suppression by the MDD diet and to identify biomarkers of cancer risk reduction.

METHODS

A plasma metabolomic analysis was performed on Apc^Δ14/+ mice maintained on either a methyl donor sufficient (MDS) diet or the protective MDD diet. A group of MDS animals was also pair-fed with the MDD mice to normalize caloric intake, and another group was shifted from an MDD to MDS diet to determine the durability of the metabolic changes.

RESULTS

In addition to the anticipated changes in folate one-carbon metabolites, plasma metabolites related to fatty acid metabolism were generally decreased by the MDD diet, including carnitine, acylcarnitines, and fatty acids. Some fatty acid selectivity was observed; the levels of cancer-promoting arachidonic acid and 2-hydroxyglutarate were decreased by the MDD diet, whereas eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) levels were increased. Machine-learning elastic net analysis revealed a positive association between the fatty acid-related compounds azelate and 7-hydroxycholesterol and tumor development, and a negative correlation with succinate and β-sitosterol.

CONCLUSION

Methyl donor restriction causes dramatic changes in systemic fatty acid metabolism. Regulating fatty acid metabolism through methyl donor restriction favorably effects fatty acid profiles to achieve cancer protection.

Functional differences between l- and d-carnitine in metabolic regulation evaluated using a low-carnitine Nile tilapia model

l-Carnitine is essential for mitochondrial β-oxidation and has been used as a lipid-lowering feed additive in humans and farmed animals. d-Carnitine is an optical isomer of l-carnitine and dl-carnitine has been widely used in animal feeds. However, the functional differences between l- and d-carnitine are difficult to study because of the endogenous l-carnitine background. In the present study, we developed a low-carnitine Nile tilapia model by treating fish with a carnitine synthesis inhibitor, and used this model to investigate the functional differences between l- and d-carnitine in nutrient metabolism in fish. l- or d-carnitine (0·4 g/kg diet) was fed to the low-carnitine tilapia for 6 weeks. l-Carnitine feeding increased the acyl-carnitine concentration from 3522 to 10 822 ng/g and alleviated the lipid deposition from 15·89 to 11·97 % in the liver of low-carnitine tilapia. However, as compared with l-carnitine group, d-carnitine feeding reduced the acyl-carnitine concentration from 10 822 to 5482 ng/g, and increased lipid deposition from 11·97 to 20·21 % and the mRNA expression of the genes involved in β-oxidation and detoxification in the liver. d-Carnitine feeding also induced hepatic inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis. A metabolomic investigation further showed that d-carnitine feeding increased glycolysis, protein metabolism and activity of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation. Thus, l-carnitine can be physiologically utilised in fish, whereas d-carnitine is metabolised as a xenobiotic and induces lipotoxicity. d-Carnitine-fed fish demonstrates increases in peroxisomal β-oxidation, glycolysis and amino acid degradation to maintain energy homeostasis. Therefore, d-carnitine is not recommended for use in farmed animals.

Dietary L-carnitine enhances the lymphatic absorption of fat and alpha-tocopherol in ovariectomized rats

This study was conducted to determine whether the feeding of dietary L-carnitine (CN) improves the intestinal absorption of fat and alpha-tocopherol (alphaTOH) in ovariectomized (OX) rats. OX adult rats were weight-matched and assigned to 2 groups fed a modified AIN-93G diet containing alphaTOH-stripped soybean oil without (-CN) or with (+CN) supplemental CN at 150 mg/kg diet. At 5 wk, each rat with a lymph cannula was infused intraduodenally at 3.0 mL/h with a lipid emulsion consisting of 565 micromol triolein labeled with (14)C ((14)C-OA), 3.6 micromol alphaTOH, and 396 micromol sodium taurocholate in 24 mL PBS buffer. Lymph was collected hourly for 8 h and analyzed for lipids. The lymphatic absorption of alphaTOH for 8 h in +CN rats (899 +/- 201 nmol) was higher (P < 0.05) than in -CN rats (587 +/- 92 nmol). The absorption of (14)C-OA in +CN rats (53.5 +/- 4.0% dose/8 h) also was increased (P < 0.05) compared with -CN rats (47.6 +/- 5.0% dose/8 h). Lymph flow did not differ between the groups. When bile was diverted but with infusion of sodium taurocholate, the lymphatic absorption of lipids did not differ. The present study provides evidence that dietary CN enhances the rates and amounts of lymphatic absorption of alphaTOH and fat in OX rats. Our findings suggest that dietary CN may influence the process of lipid packaging and absorption by the enterocyte in OX rats, and may explain in part the increased status of alphaTOH in CN-fed animals.

Responses of dairy cows during early lactation to ruminal or abomasal administration of L-carnitine

Six multiparous Holstein cows were used in a replicated Latin square to investigate the effects of carnitine administration into the rumen or abomasum. Treatments were 1) control, 2) twice daily ruminal administration of carnitine, and 3) continuous abomasal infusion of carnitine. Cows not receiving abomasal carnitine were infused continuously with an equal volume of water. Carnitine dosage was constant for both treatments (226 mg/kg of DMI; ca. 6 g/d). The diet fed to all cows contained 3% added fat. Carnitine concentrations in plasma and liver increased when carnitine was administered into either the rumen or abomasum, indicating that both sites of administration were equally effective at increasing carnitine concentrations in tissue. Milk yield, milk composition, and DMI were unaffected by carnitine supplementation, except for increased SNF content. Apparent digestibilities of lipid, energy, and total fatty acids increased with carnitine administration at either site. The concentration of VFA in ruminal fluid tended to increase with ruminal carnitine, and the percentage of propionate increased when carnitine was administered at either site. Retained N tended to increase when carnitine was administered, primarily because of greater retained N when carnitine was administered ruminally. Excretion of carnitine in milk and urine increased when carnitine was administered at either site. Carnitine supplementation increased concentrations of carnitine in plasma and liver and improved lipid digestibility.