Serum lipoprotein(a) levels differ in different phenotypes of primary hyperlipoproteinemia

A prospective study of lipoprotein(a) and risk of coronary heart disease among women with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

We examined the association between lipoprotein (Lp)(a) and CHD among women with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Of 32,826 women from the Nurses' Health Study who provided blood at baseline, we followed 921 who had a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

During 10 years of follow-up (6,835 person-years), we documented 122 incident cases of CHD. After adjustment for age, smoking, BMI, glycosylated HbA(1)c, triglycerides (TGs), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other cardiovascular risk factors, the relative risk (RR) comparing extreme quintiles of Lp(a) was 1.95 (95% CI 1.07-3.56). The association was not appreciably altered after further adjustment for apolipoprotein B(100) or several inflammatory biomarkers. Increasing levels of Lp(a) were associated with lower levels of TGs. The probability of developing CHD over 10 years was higher among diabetic women with substantially higher levels of both Lp(a) (>1.07 micromol/l) and TGs (>2.26 mmol/l) than among diabetic women with lower levels (22 vs 10%, p log-rank test=0.049). Diabetic women with a higher level of only Lp(a) or TGs had a similar (14%) risk. In a multivariate model, diabetic women with higher levels of Lp(a) and TGs had an RR of 2.46 (95% CI 1.21-5.01) for developing CHD, as compared with those with lower levels of both biomarkers (p for interaction=0.413). The RRs for women with a higher level of either Lp(a) (RR=1.22, 95% CI 0.77-1.92) or TGs (RR=1.39, 95% CI 0.78-2.42) were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Increased levels of Lp(a) were independently associated with risk of CHD among diabetic women.

Lipoprotein (a) and its immune complexes in dyslipidemic subjects

OBJECTIVES

To investigate plasma levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-circulating immune complexes (IC) in subjects with various dyslipidemias.

METHODS

Plasma Lp(a), Lp(a)-IC, and LDL-IC levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in 198 subjects with various dyslipidemias and 34 control subjects.

RESULTS

Hypertriglyceridemic subjects exhibited the lowest plasma Lp(a) levels, while hypercholesterolemic subjects exhibited the highest levels. Subjects with mixed hyperlipidemia had intermediate plasma Lp(a) concentrations, which were significantly lower than those of subjects with normal lipid levels. Interestingly, we also found that hypertriglyceridemic subjects had the lowest plasma Lp(a)-IC and LDL-IC levels, while hypercholesterolemic subjects exhibited the highest levels. Triglyceride (TG) levels were negatively correlated with Lp(a) (r = -0.15, P < 0.05), Lp(a)-IC (r = -0.20, P < 0.01), and LDL-IC (r = -0.214, P < 0.01) concentrations. Furthermore, significantly positive relationships were found between Lp(a)-IC and Lp(a) levels (r = 0.65, P < 0.001) and between LDL-IC and LDL-C levels (r = 0.43, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results argue for a regulatory role of TG on plasma Lp(a) and its circulating immune complexes in subjects with various dyslipidemias. The circulating levels of these immune complexes levels are likely to change with different concentrations of Lp(a) and LDL.

Atorvastatin lowers lipoprotein(a) but not apolipoprotein(a) fragment levels in hypercholesterolemic subjects at high cardiovascular risk

The effect of statins on Lp(a) levels is controversial; furthermore, the potential action of statins on apo(a) fragmentation is indeterminate. We therefore determined the circulating levels of Lp(a) and of apo(a) fragments in hypercholesterolemic patients before and after treatment (6 weeks) with Atorvastatin 10 mg/day (A10) or Simvastatin 20 mg/day (S20). In a double blind study, hypercholesterolemic patients (n=391) at high cardiovascular risk (LDL-C>=4.13 mmol/l; TG<2.24 mmol/l; 34% with documented CHD; 45% hypertensive; and 29% current smokers) were assigned to treatment with A10 (n=199) or S20 (n=192). Plasma Lp(a) and apo(a) fragment levels (n=206) were measured prior to and after treatment. At baseline, A10 and S20 groups did not differ in plasma levels of lipids, Lp(a) (A10: 0.45+/-0.48 mg/ml, S20: 0.46+/-0.5), and apo(a) fragments (A10: 3.88+/-5.22 microg/ml; S20: 3.25+/-3), and equally in apo(a) isoform size (A10: 26+/-5 kr, S20: 25.5+/-5.3). After treatment, both statins significantly reduced Lp(a) levels (A10: 0.42+/-0.47 mg/ml, 6% variation, P<0.001; S20: 0.45+/-0.53 mg/ml, 0.02% variation, P=0.046). A10 and S20 did not significantly differ in their efficacy to lower Lp(a) levels. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the reduction of Lp(a) levels was independently associated with Lp(a) baseline concentration, but not to other variables, including LDL-C reduction. Plasma levels of apo(a) fragments were not modified by either statin. In conclusion, both A10 and S20 significantly lowered Lp(a), although this effect was of greater magnitude in atorvastatin-treated patients.

Molecular analysis of apo(a) fragmentation in polygenic hypercholesterolemia: characterization of a new plasma fragment pattern

Hypercholesterolemia is frequently associated with elevated Lp(a) levels, an independent risk factor for coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease. A portion of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] circulates as a series of fragments derived from the N-terminal region of apo(a). The relationship of elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to those of circulating apo(a) fragments in polygenic hypercholesterolemia is indeterminate. Therefore, plasma Lp(a) and plasma and urinary apo(a) fragment levels were measured by ELISA in 82 patients with polygenic type IIa hypercholesterolemia (low density lipoprotein cholesterol >/=4.13 mmol/L and triglycerides <2.24 mmol/L) and in 90 normolipidemic subjects. Lp(a) levels were significantly elevated in patients compared with control subjects (0.35+/-0.4 and 0.24+/-0.31 mg/mL, respectively; median 0.13 and 0.11 mg/mL, respectively; P=0.039), although apo(a) isoform distribution did not differ. Patients displayed significantly higher plasma and urinary apo(a) fragment levels than did control subjects (respective values were as follows: 4.97+/-5.51 and 2.15+/-2.57 [median 2.85 and 1.17] microg/mL in plasma, P<0.0001; 75+/-86 and 40+/-57 [median 38 and 17] ng/mg urinary creatinine in urine, P<0.0001). The ratio of plasma apo(a) fragments to Lp(a) levels was also significantly higher in patients than in control subjects (1.93+/-1.5% and 1.75+/-2.36%, respectively; P<0.0001). We conclude that increased plasma Lp(a) levels in polygenic hypercholesterolemia are associated with elevated circulating levels of apo(a) fragments but that this increase is not due to decreased renal clearance of apo(a) fragments. Furthermore, we identified a new pattern of apo(a) fragmentation characterized by the predominance of a fragment band whose size was related to that of the parent apo(a) isoform and that was superimposed on the series of fragments described previously by Mooser et al (J Clin Invest. 1996; 98:2414-2424). This new pattern was associated with small apo(a) isoforms and did not discriminate between hypercholesterolemic and normal subjects. However, this new apo(a) fragment pattern may constitute a novel marker for cardiovascular risk.

Differential influence of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides on lipoprotein(a) concentrations in diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between plasma lipid profiles and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in diabetic patients, taking into account the Lp(a) phenotype.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We included 191 consecutive diabetic outpatients (69 type 1 and 122 type 2 diabetic patients) in a cross-sectional study Serum Lp(a) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and Lp(a) phenotypes were assessed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting. The statistical methods included a stepwise multiple regression analysis using the Lp(a) serum concentration as the dependent variable. The lipid profile consisted of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, corrected LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoproteins AI and B.

RESULTS

In the multiple regression analysis, LDL cholesterol (positively) and triglycerides (negatively) were independently related to the Lp(a) concentration, and they explained the 6.6 and 7.8% of the Lp(a) variation, respectively. After correcting LDL cholesterol, the two variables explained 3.8 and 6.4% of the Lp(a) variation, respectively. In addition, we observed that serum Lp(a) concentrations were significantly lower in patients with type IV hyperlipidemia (mean 1.0 mg/dl [range 0.5-17], n = 16) than in normolipidemic patients (6.5 mg/dl [0.5-33.5], n = 117) and in type II hyperlipidemic patients (IIa 15.5 mg/dl [3.5-75], n = 13; IIb 9 mg/dl [1-80], n = 45); P < 0.001 by analysis of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) concentrations were directly correlated with LDL cholesterol and negatively correlated with triglyceride levels in diabetic patients. Therefore, our results suggest that the treatment of diabetic dyslipemia may indirectly affect Lp(a) concentrations.

Quantification of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) in plasma and lipoprotein fractions in the hypertriglyceridemic state

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in particular in association with high low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations. Hypertriglyceridemia on the other hand has been found to be associated with low Lp(a) values. This observation could be confirmed in 851 patients of the outpatient lipid clinic. Lp(a) median levels were 2.7-fold higher in patients with triglycerides below 200 mg/dl as compared with patients expressing triglyceride levels above 200 mg/dl (19 vs 7 mg/dl, P < 0.0001). In contrast to these data apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] has been detected in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL). To find out whether the presence of apo(a) in TRL is determined by the concentration of these particles, apo(a) concentrations were measured in TRL in fasting plasma of ten hypertriglyceridemic patients and ten normal controls with Lp(a) serum levels above 25 mg/dl. The apo(a) concentration in TRL did not show statistically significant differences between controls and patients (2.0+/-0.9 vs 1.8+/-1.6 mg/dl). In the second part of the study apo(a) levels in TRL were measured before and after fat feeding in eight healthy volunteers. Again no significant differences were observed in the apo(a) concentrations of the d < 1.006 a ml fraction before and after fat feeding (1.03+/-1.06 vs 0.81+/-0.63 mg/dl). In summary, this study fails to show an association of apo(a) with TRL for different states of hypertriglyceridemia. This negative finding is shown for constant particle numbers but might not be true if the particle number in TRL increases.

Lipoprotein (a) concentrations in patients with various dyslipidaemias

Although the genetic background is the most important determinant of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) concentration other factors, such as coexistent dyslipidaemia, could modify its levels. We undertook the present study to examine the serum Lp(a) concentration in various dyslipidaemias and to reveal any correlation of serum Lp(a) concentration with the other lipid parameters in a large group of dyslipidaemic Greek patients. A total of 242 patients followed as outpatients in our lipid clinic were studied. The patients were stratified into four main groups. Patients with cholesterol levels greater than 5.17 mmol/L but normal triglycerides were regarded as hypercholesterolaemic (n=85), patients with triglycerides greater than 2.25 mmol/L but normal cholesterol levels as hypertriglyceridaemic (n=51), patients with both increased cholesterol and triglyceride levels as having mixed hyperlipidaemia (n=62), and finally patients with decreased (<0.90 mmol/L) high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol but normal cholesterol and triglyceride levels as having primary hypoalphalipoproteinaemia (n=44). Hypercholesterolaemic patients exhibited the highest serum Lp(a) levels, while hypertriglyceridaemic patients exhibited the lowest. Patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia had intermediate serum Lp(a) concentration, which was significantly higher than that of hypertriglyceridaemic patients but significantly lower than that of hypercholesterolaemic patients. Interestingly, patients with low serum HDL-cholesterol levels presented with low serum Lp(a) concentration similar to that of hypertriglyceridaemic patients. In hypercholesterolaemic patients no correlation was found between serum total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol nor apolipoprotein B (apoB) levels and Lp(a) concentration. On the contrary, in hypertriglyceridaemic patients an inverse correlation was observed between serum triglycerides and Lp(a) concentration. After dividing the hypertriglyceridaemic patients into one group with elevated (>1.3 g/L) serum apoB levels (n=32) and another group with normal apoB levels (n=19), we found that the median serum Lp(a) concentration was three times higher in hyperapoB patients compared to patients with normal apoB levels. We conclude that serum Lp(a) levels are different in various types of primary hyperlipidaemia and are modulated according to the type of lipid elevation.

Lipoprotein(a) is an independent risk factor for multiple cerebral infarctions

In an attempt to ascertain whether Lp(a) is a risk factor for multiple cerebral infarctions (MCI), we have studied 83 patients with proven MCI and 39 subjects without MCI by computed tomography (CT). Seventy-one patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) were included: 52 with and 19 without MCI. Serum Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with MCI than in subjects without MCI. There were no differences in serum Lp(a) levels between NIDDM and non-diabetic patients with MCI. The logistic regression analysis revealed that Lp(a) and hypertension were independent risk factors for the cerebral event. The current study demonstrated that Lp(a) and hypertension are significant risk factors for multiple cerebral infarctions.