The capacity of Drosophila for detecting relevant genetic damage

Development Features on the Selection of Animal Models for Teratogenic Testing

Today, the use of animal models from different species continues to represent a fundamental step in teratogenic testing, despite the increase in alternative solutions that provide an important screening to the enormous quantity of new substances that aim to enter the market every year. The maintenance of these models is due to the sharing of similar development processes with humans, and in this way they represent an important contribution to the safety in the use of the compounds tested. Furthermore, the application of advances in embryology to teratology, although hampered by the complexity of reproductive processes, continues to prove the importance of sensitivity during embryonic and fetal development to detect potential toxicity, inducing mortality/abortion and malformations.In this chapter, essential periods of development in different models are outlined, highlighting the similarities and differences between species, the advantages and disadvantages of each group, and specific sensitivities for teratogenic testing. Models can be divided into invertebrate species such as earthworms of the species Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster, allowing for rapid results and minor ethical concerns. Vertebrate nonmammalian species Xenopus laevis and Danio rerio are important models to assess teratogenic potential later in development with fewer ethical requirements. Finally, the mammalian species Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Oryctolagus cuniculus, phylogenetically closer to humans, are essential for the assessment of complex specialized processes, occurring later in development.Regulations for the development of toxicology tests require the use of mammalian species. Although ethical concerns and costs limit their use in large-scale screening. On the other hand, invertebrate and vertebrate nonmammalian species are increasing as alternative animal models, as these organisms combine low cost, less ethical requirements, and culture conditions compatible with large-scale screening. Their main advantage is to allow high-throughput screening in a whole-animal context, in contrast to the in vitro techniques, not dependent on the prior identification of a target. Better knowledge of the development pathways of animal models will allow to maximize human translation and reduce the number of animals used, leading to a selection of compounds with an improved safety profile and reduced time to market for new drugs.

Biological Concerns on the Selection of Animal Models for Teratogenic Testing

During pregnancy fetus can be exposed to a variety of chemicals which may induce abortion and malformations. Due to the amounts of new substances coming into the market every year, a high demand for a rapid, reliable, and cost-effective method to detect potential toxicity is necessary. Different species have been used as animal models for teratogen screening, most of them sharing similar development processes with humans. However, the application of embryology knowledge to teratology is hampered by the complexity of the reproduction processes.The present chapter outlines the essential development periods in different models, and highlights the similarities and differences between species, advantages and disadvantages of each group, and specific sensitivities for teratogenic tests. These models can be organized into the following categories: (1) invertebrate species such Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, which have become ideal for screening simple mechanisms in the early periods of reproductive cycle, allowing for rapid results and minor ethical concerns; (2) vertebrate nonmammalian species such Xenopus laevis and Danio rerio, important models to assess teratogenic potential in later development with fewer ethical requirements; and (3) the mammalian species Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Oryctolagus cuniculus, phylogenetically more close to humans, essential to assess complex specialized processes, that occur later in development.Rules for development toxicology tests require the use of mammalian species. However, ethical concerns and costs limit their use in large-scale screening. By contrast, invertebrate and vertebrate nonmammalian species are increasing as alternative animal models, as these organisms combine less ethical requirements, low costs and culture conditions compatible with large-scale screening. In contrast to the in vitro techniques, their main advantage is to allow for high-throughput screening in a whole-animal context, not dependent on the prior identification of a target. In this chapter, the biological development of the animals most used in teratogenic tests is adressed with the aims of maximizing human translation, reducing the number of animals used, and the time to market for new drugs.

Protective effects of tea polyphenols and β-carotene against γ-radiation induced mutation and oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster

Background

The commonly consumed antioxidants β-carotene and tea polyphenols were used to assess their protective effects against γ-radiation induced sex-linked recessive lethal (SLRL) mutation and oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster. Third instar larvae and adult males of wild-type Oregon-K (ORK) were fed on test agents for 24 and 72 h respectively before exposure to 10Gy γ-irradiation. The treated/control flies were used to assess the induction of SLRLs. We also evaluated antioxidant properties of these phytochemicals in the third instar larvae.

Results

Different stages of spermatogenesis in adult males showed a decrease in γ-radiation induced SLRL frequencies upon co-treatment with test agents. A similar trend was observed in larvae. Furthermore, a significant increase in antioxidant enzymatic activities with a decrease in malondialdehyde content was observed.

Conclusion

β-carotene and tea polyphenols have exerted antigenotoxic and antioxidant effects in Drosophila. This study demonstrated the suitability of Drosophila as an alternative to mammalian testing for evaluating the antigenotoxic and antioxidant activity of natural products.

Environmental chemical mediated male reproductive toxicity: Drosophila melanogaster as an alternate animal model

Industrialization and indiscriminate use of agrochemicals have increased the human health risk. Recent epidemiological studies raised a concern for male reproduction given their observations of reduced sperm counts and altered semen quality. Interestingly, environmental factors that include various metals, pesticides and their metabolites have been causally linked to such adversities by their presence in the semen at levels that correlate to infertility. The epidemiological observations were further supported by studies in animal models involving various chemicals. Therefore, in this review, we focused on male reproductive toxicity and the adverse effects of different environmental chemicals on male reproduction. However, it is beyond the scope of this review to provide a detailed appraisal of all of the environmental chemicals that have been associated with reproductive toxicity in animals. Here, we provided the evidence for reproductive adversities of some commonly encountered chemicals (pesticides/metals) in the environment. In view of the recent thrust for an alternate to animal models in research, we subsequently discussed the contributions of Drosophila melanogaster as an alternate animal model for quick screening of toxicants for their reproductive toxicity potential. Finally, we emphasized the genetic and molecular tools offered by Drosophila for understanding the mechanisms underlying the male reproductive toxicity.

Chromosome malsegregation induced by the rodent carcinogens acetamide, pyridine and diethanolamine in Drosophila melanogaster females

The effect of the rodent carcinogens acetamide (AC), pyridine (PY) and diethanolamine (DEA) on meiotic chromosome segregation was assessed in 4-day-old Drosophila melanogaster females. After oral treatment with 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% PY; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 4% AC; or 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80% DEA, the females were mated to 7-day-old males and three 24h broods were obtained to sample cells exposed mainly as mature oocytes (brood I), and nearly mature oocytes (brood II) with an increasing proportion of early oocytes (brood III). Viability was not affected at the two (PY) or three (AC, DEA) lowest concentrations, decreasing thereafter. PY increased the frequency of nondisjunction exclusively in brood II suggesting its interaction with specific targets. AC and DEA (the most active of the three) induced similar frequencies of nondisjunction in all broods suggesting unspecific cell division perturbations probably due to toxicity. No clear dose effect relationships were observed.

A comparative study of the antimutagenic effects of antioxidants on chemical mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

The 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative 2,6-dimethyl-3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-4-(Na carboxylate)-1,4-dihydropyridine (1,4-DHP) was studied for antimutagenic effects in the dominant lethal test and in the sex-linked recessive lethal test of Drosophila melanogaster. The observed effects were compared with those of the radioprotectors cysteine and cysteamine and with those of the phenolic antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). In a wide range of concentrations, including low ones, 1,4-DHP reduces the frequency of EMS-induced genetic damage (point mutations and chromosome breakage). A reduction of the mutation rate induced by EMS in adults could be observed independently of the developmental stages (larvae or imago) pretreated with 1,4-DHP. The protective effect of this new antimutagen against the alkylating agent depended on both the 1,4-DHP dose and the level of the EMS-induced mutation rate. The effect of 1,4-DHP was more pronounced than that of the studied radioprotectors. It is concluded that dihydropyridine-type compounds are able to protect eukaryote germs cells from genetic damage produced by direct-acting mutagens such as EMS.

Effect of glyoxal pretreatment on radiation-induced genetic damage in Drosophila melanogaster

The effects of glyoxal and of glyoxal pretreatments on radiation-induced genetic damage were investigated in Drosophila melanogaster mature sperm, by means of sex-linked recessive and dominant lethality, reciprocal translocation and chromosome loss tests. In addition, the possible mutagenic effect of glyoxal was assessed in postmeiotic cells up to 7 days after treatment. The results obtained show: (1) the frequencies of recessive lethals after glyoxal treatment were within control values, (2) no clastogenic effect of glyoxal was observed, (3) glyoxal pretreatment did not modify the frequency of recessive lethals induced by X-rays, (4) after pretreatment with glyoxal a consistent, though not significant, increase was seen in the frequency of reciprocal translocations in 3 replicate experiments, (5) the yield of dominant lethals and of complete and partial chromosome loss induced by radiation was significantly increased by pretreatments with glyoxal. It is suggested that the increase of the frequency of genetic endpoints resulting from chromosome breakage, when glyoxal was administered prior to irradiation, could be ascribed to: (a) a sensitizing action of glyoxal to the clastogenic effect of ionizing radiation; (b) the formation of reactive species by the interaction of glyoxal with radiation; and/or (c) interference of glyoxal with the normal handling of radiation-induced lesions in mature postmeiotic male cells.

Mutagenic effects of irradiated glucose in Drosophila melanogaster

The mutagenic effects of irradiated glucose were studied using the sex-linked recessive lethal test in Drosophila melanogaster. Oregon K males of D. melanogaster reared on a medium containing 20 or 40% glucose irradiated with a dose of 0.02, 0.10, 0.20, 2 or 5 Mrad gamma-rays were scored for the induction of sex-linked recessive lethals. The results showed no significant increase in the frequency of X-lethals in Drosophila at any of the dose levels.

Relation between the somatic toxicity of dimethylnitrosamine and a genetically determined variation in the level and induction of cytochrome P450 in Drosophila melanogaster

The insecticide-resistant Drosophila strain Hikone R differs genetically from sensitive strains by having a higher activity of cytochrome P450 and a lack of inducibility with phenobarbital. Toxicity tests with dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) showed that: (a) the toxic effect of DMN was higher in the insecticide-resistant strain than in sensitive strains in accord with data by Vogel (1980); and (b) induction with phenobarbital increased the toxicity of DMN in the sensitive strains but not in the resistant strain. A dominant gene, responsible for the metabolic pattern of Hikone R and the non-inducibility, was located to 66 cM, near the gene vg in chromosome 2. This gene is most likely identical with that causing insecticide resistance, described by Kikkawa (1961).

Mutagenic effects of nitrogen dioxide combined with methylurea and ethylurea in Drosophila melanogaster

The standard sex-linked recessive lethal test was used to test whether NO2 induces lethal mutations in male germ cells of Drosophila in the presence or absence of alkylureas. Methylurea, ethylurea and NO2 alone did not enhance the mutation frequency significantly. However, highly significant enhancement in the mutation frequency was observed when adult flies were exposed to NO2 (150--280 ppm) for 3 h after ingestion of methylurea (0.1 M) or ethylurea (0.1 M) for 2 days. Oral administration of ethylnitrosourea and also of methylurea or ethylurea that had been exposed to NO2 in vitro were more effective in increasing the mutation frequency than methylurea or ethylurea combined in vivo with NO2. These results suggest that ingested alkylurea is converted in vivo by inhaled NO2 to highly mutagenic nitrosoalkylurea and/or other mutagens. No significant enhancement of the mutation frequency was observed when flies were fed on methylurea solution after they had been exposed to NO2.

Test systems for mutagenicity screening of environmental chemicals and their relevance for the evaluation of genetic hazards to man

Mutagenicity test systems play a dual role in public health: (1) to identify chemicals in our environment that are capable of causing genetic alterations and thus pose a threat of genetic damage to generations yet unborn and (2) as a faster screen (than many of the conventional carcinogenicity tests) to identify chemicals with carcinogenic potentials. In this paper the different mutagenicity test systems currently available are reviewed together with a discussion of their advantages and disadvantages. It is argued that our current data base does not permit a realistic quantitative assessment of genetic hazards ensuing from exposure to environmental chemicals and that only qualitative conclusions are possible. A framework which may be useful in the context of the latter is briefly outlined.

Mutagenic effects of fluphenazine hydrochloride in Drosophila melanogaster

The mutagenic potential of fluphenazine hydrochloride was tested on male germ cells of Drosophila melanogaster. The criterion used was sex-linked recessive lethal mutations. Oregon-K males of D. melanogaster, reared on a medium containing 0.01, 0.02 and 0.03 mg/ml of the drug, were screened for sex-linked recessive lethal mutations. The incidence of sex-linked lethals was significant. The results clearly demonstrate that fluphenazine is capable of inducing recessive lethal mutations in Drosophila especially in pre-meiotic stages of spermatogenesis.

Chromosomal damage by alcohol in vitro and in vivo

Alcohol has no damaging effects on human chromosomes in vitro. The chromosomes of alcoholics, however, show a significant elevation of aberrations. Alcohol inhibits cellular and cell free RNA synthesis. One possible reason for the mutagenic activity of alcohol in vivo may be an inhibition of cellular repair.