Differential radiosensitivity of the uni- and bi-filarly BrdUrd-substituted chromatids of muntjac chromosomes

On the nature of visible chromosomal gaps and breaks

From the earliest days of chromosomal aberration studies, the distinction, nature and origin of light-microscope observed "gaps" and "breaks" have been topics for debate and controversy. In this paper we survey, briefly, the various ideas that have appeared in the very extensive literature, and attempt to evaluate them in the light of our current understanding of chromosome structure and aberration formation. Attention is drawn to the problems of interpretation caused by G2/S cell imprecision.

The genetic toxicology of 5-bromodeoxyuridine in mammalian cells

The thymidine analog, BrdUrd, induces many biological responses which are of importance to the field of genetic toxicology and related disciplines. These include the induction of SCE, specific-locus mutations, and toxicity, inhibition of cell proliferation, and the expression of fragile sites in the human genome. In early models which addressed the mechanisms of the biological effects of BrdUrd exposure, two pathways were proposed to account for the induction of the biological responses. Incorporation of the enol form of BrdUrd into the nascent DNA strand after pairing with deoxyguanosine was proposed as one pathway, whereas the incorporation of BrdUrd opposite adenosine in place of thymidine was proposed as the second pathway. Many novel and sophisticated techniques have been applied to the study of the mechanism of the induction of biological effects by BrdUrd leading to a substantial increase in our understanding of these mechanisms. However, the experimental evidence clearly supports the contention that BrdUrd exerts its effects on eukaryotic cells through mechanisms similar to those originally proposed to explain the genotoxicity of BrdUrd.

Blood lymphocyte culture system: quantitative analysis of X-ray-induced chromosome aberrations in man, muntjac and cattle

Peripheral blood lymphocytes of 3 mammalian species, man, muntjac and cattle, which have various amounts of DNA and divergent karyotypes, were exposed to 100-400 rad of X-rays, and frequencies of dicentrics and other aberrations were analysed at first post-irradiation metaphases. During experiments, various preparative or physical and biological factors that could influence the yield of chromosome aberrations were taken into account. The frequency of dicentrics scored at first post-irradiation metaphases showed best fit to both linear and quadratic dose-response curves, y = a + bD and y = bD + cD2 with a high correlation coefficient of 0.98 (P less than 0.001). The frequency of dicentrics obtained at different post-irradiation fixation times did not show significant variation, indicating a homogeneous sensitivity of peripheral lymphocytes to X-irradiation. BrdU incorporation following X-irradiation showed no increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations. The frequency of dicentrics in man, muntjac and cattle showed a close correlation with their DNA content, but no meaningful correlation was found between the yield of dicentrics and the chromosome arm number or the nuclear volume. The ratio of dicentric yields, 1.00:0.67:1.04 obtained in man, muntjac and cattle were comparable to the ratio of their DNA contents, 1.00: 0.65: 1.07. The base-line frequency of SCEs was similar in the 3 species and no significant variation in SCE frequency was noticed even after administration of 400 rad of X-rays.

Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and structural chromosome aberration in mutagenicity testing

Data from previous studies published on the induction by mutagens of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and structural chromosome damage were compared qualitatively and quantitatively. Although a good correlation between the incidence of both cytogenetic phenomena has been pointed out in many previous publications, about 30% of the agents for which comparable data were available yielded non-corresponding qualitative results concerning both indicator effects. However, even in groups with good qualitative agreement distinct quantitative differences indicated different molecular mechanisms of the formation of SCEs and breaks. Additional information supporting the importance of these differences for the validity of both indicator systems has been derived from the results obtained using strong clastogens exhibiting a low or no SCE-inducing activity and vice versa, from special observations on chromosomal breakage syndromes, and from studies on the action of known co- and anti-clastogens on SCE-induction by chemical mutagens. As a result, it has been suggested that the SCE-technique should be considered as a valuable additional method for cytogenetic mutagenicity testing, which, however, is not adequate to replace the classical methods of analysis of structural chromosome damage.

X-ray sensitization of chromatids with unifilarly and bifilary substituted DNA

When cells are grown for two rounds of DNA replication in the presence of the thymidine analogue 5-bromodeoxyuridine, chromosomes containing one chromatid with unifilarly substituted DNA and one with bifilarly substituted DNA are found. These can be distinguished by harlequin staining techniques that stain one chromatid dark and one light. When the degree of substitution is 60% or greater, 3 times as many X-ray-induced chromatid breaks are produced as in unsubstituted chromatids. This represents maximal sensitization. The unifilarly substituted (dark) chromatid is as sensitive as its bifilarly substituted (light) sister chromatid. If cells are grown in low concentrations of 5-bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd), then the amount of substitution is less and the bifilarly substituted chromatid is more sensitive than the unifilarly substituted one. When large numbers of cells are grown in very low concentrations of BrdUrd, the analogue is almost completely depleted during the first round of replication leading to harlequin chromosomes containing one unsubstituted (dark) and one unifilarly substituted (light) chromatid. Under these conditions a maximal sensitization between light-staining and dark-staining chromatids can occur. This can be confused with the differential sensitivity between unifilarly and bifilarly substituted chromatids. The apparent discrepant results obtained by different investigators are most likely caused by the use of very low levels of BrdUrd in some of the experiments.