A BrdU pulse double-labelling method for studying adaptive response

Absence of Adaptive Response to Low Doses of X-rays in Preimplantation Embryos and Spleen Lymphocytes of an Inbred Mouse Strain as Compared to Human Peripheral Lymphocytes: A Cytogenetic Study

The adaptive response was studied in preimplantation embryos and spleen lymphocytes of a mouse inbred strain and in peripheral lymphocytes of three human donors, using chromosomal aberrations as the endpoint. Embryos were adapted to 0.05 Gy X-ray 50 h post-conception either in vitro or in vivo and challenged 6 h later. Chromosome aberrations of the 8----16 cell stage mitoses were scored. No adaptive response was seen in the embryos. Of 14 female mice studied, an adaptive response was seen in spleen lymphocytes of only one mouse. However, because variable chromosomal aberration levels were observed in lymphocytes of different donors, it is concluded that the adaptive response detected was merely a result of this heterogeneity. In human peripheral lymphocytes an adaptive response was seen in all three donors. It is speculated that the inbred mouse strain used is deficient in the adaptive response.

Radioadaptive response revisited

Radiation-induced adaptive response belongs to the group of non-targeted effects that do not require direct exposure of the cell nucleus by radiation. It is described as the reduced damaging effect of a challenging radiation dose when induced by a previous low priming dose. Adaptive responses have been observed in vitro and in vivo using various indicators of cellular damage, such as cell lethality, chromosomal aberrations, mutation induction, radiosensitivity, and DNA repair. Adaptive response can be divided into three successive biological phenomena, the intracellular response, the extracellular signal, and the maintenance. The intracellular response leading to adaptation of a single cell is a complex biological process including induction or suppression of gene groups. An extracellular signal, the nature of which is unknown, may be sent by the affected cell to neighbouring cells causing them to adapt as well. This occurs either by a release of diffusible signalling molecules or by gap-junction intercellular communication. Adaptive response can be maintained for periods ranging from of a few hours to several months. Constantly increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or nitric oxide (NO) have been observed in adapted cells and both factors may play a role in the maintenance process. Although adaptive response seems to function by an on/off principle, it is a phenomenon showing a high degree of inter- and intraindividual variability. It remains to be seen to what extent adaptive response is functional in humans at relevant dose and dose-rate exposures. A better understanding of adaptive response and other non-targeted effects is needed before they can be confirmed as risk estimate factors for the human population at low levels of ionising radiation.

Pre-exposure to Low Doses: Modulation of X-Ray-Induced DNA Damage and Repair?

The adaptive response to ionizing radiation may be mediated by the induction of antioxidant defense mechanisms, accelerated repair or altered cell cycle progression after the conditioning dose. To gain new insight into the mechanism of the adaptive response, nondividing lymphocytes and fibroblasts were used to eliminate possible contributions of cell cycle effects. The effect of conditioning doses of 0.05 or 0.1 Gy followed by challenging doses up to 8 Gy (with a 4-h interval between exposures) on induction and repair of DNA damage was determined by single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay), premature chromosome condensation, and immunofluorescence labeling for gamma-H2AX. The conditioning dose reduced the induction of DNA strand breaks, but the kinetics of strand break rejoining was not influenced by the conditioning dose in nondividing cells of either cell type. We conclude that adaptation in nondividing cells is not mediated by enhanced strand break rejoining and that protection against the induction of DNA damage is rather small. Therefore, the adaptive response is most likely a reflection of perturbation of cell cycle progression.

Adaptive response: stimulated DNA repair or decreased damage fixation?

The aim was to review the present state of knowledge on the adaptive response and attempt to redefine the acknowledged model in the framework of the transcription-based model of damage fixation of Radford (2002). Data are reviewed that suggest that the priming stimulus is the source of signalling that eventually leads to expression of the adaptive response. For a certain time, the 'primed' cell can then respond to the challenge dose by an increased recovery, as compared with the control one. An essential part of the adaptive response is generation or receipt and transmission of a signal that is the direct cause of initiation of a cellular response that diminishes the effects of DNA damage. The often accepted view that DNA repair is stimulated in the 'primed' and challenged cell is not supported by all the available data. Taking into account the abrogation of radio-adaptation by poly(ADP-ribosylation) inhibitors applied simultaneously with the challenge dose and the fact that adaptation is revealed as a decrease in chromosomal aberration frequency, one can apply to the adaptive response the same arguments as those that support the fixation model of Radford. Adaptive response (at least in part) is due to diminished fixation of double-strand breaks in the transcription factories by the mechanism proposed by Radford.

Adaptive response studies may help choose astronauts for long-term space travel

Long-term manned exploratory missions are planned for the future. Exposure to high-energy neutrons, protons and high charge and energy particles during a deep space mission, needs protection against the detrimental effects of space radiation. It has been suggested that exposure to unpredictable extremely large solar particle events would kill the astronauts without massive shielding. To reduce this risk to astronauts and to minimize the need for shielding, astronauts with highest significant adaptive responses should be chosen. It has been demonstrated that some humans living in very high natural radiation areas have acquired high adaptive responses to external radiation. Therefore, we suggest that for a deep space mission the adaptive response of all potential crew members be measured and only those with high adaptive response be chosen. We also proclaim that chronic exposure to elevated levels of radiation can considerably decrease radiation susceptibility and better protect astronauts against the unpredictable exposure to sudden and dramatic increase in flux due to solar flares and coronal mass ejections.

Cytogenetic adaptive response in cultured human lymphocytes: dependence on the time of exposure to adapting and challenging doses of gamma-rays

Human lymphocytes from 16 healthy donors were exposed in vitro to an adapting dose of gamma-rays (0.05 Gy) at G0, or G1, or G1/S stage of the cell cycle and subsequently to a challenging dose of gamma-rays at G1, or G1/S, or S (1 Gy), or G2 (0.5 Gy) stage. Frequencies and distributions of the induced chromosome aberrations were analyzed in first-division metaphases. The data averaged over the donors revealed the protective action of the adapting exposure under the irradiation schemes with the challenging dose delivered at S or G2 stage. The majority of aberrations induced at these stages belonged to the chromatid type, and their yield was significantly higher in G2-exposed cells than in S-exposed cells. However, the relative reduction of the challenging dose effect (about 34%) in the adapted cells did not depend on the magnitude of this effect, and its value remained the same (within the experimental error) if aberrations were subdivided into chromosome and chromatid types or grouped as total deletions and total fragments. The adaptive response was not revealed under the schemes with the challenging dose delivered at G1 or G1/S stage. Analysis of the individual results showed that, in one and the same donor, the adaptive response could be observed under one irradiation scheme and not observed under other schemes, the most effective schemes being those with the challenging dose delivered at G2 stage. Four donors, however, did not show the adaptive response even under such schemes. Data on aberration distributions suggested that different repair processes, rather than a unique one, may underlie the adaptive response.

Adaptive response to DNA-damaging agents: a review of potential mechanisms

The study of the adaptive response, i.e. a reduced effect from a higher challenging dose of a stressor when a smaller inducing dose had been applied a few hours earlier, has opened many new vistas into the mechanisms by which cells can adapt to hazardous environments. Although the entire chain from the initial event, supposedly the presence of DNA damage, to the end effect, presumably improved DNA repair, has not been fully elucidated, many individual links have been postulated. Initial elements--following the still unknown signal for the presence of radiation damage--are various kinases (protein kinase C and stress-activated protein kinases), which, in turn, induce early response genes whose products initiate a cascade of protein-DNA interactions that regulate gene transcription and ultimately result in specific biological responses. These responses include the activation of later genes that can promote production of growth factors and cytokines, trigger DNA repair, and regulate progress through the cell cycle. Indeed, there appears to be a relation between the induction of the adaptive response and the effects of radiation and cytostatic agents on the cell cycle, although these effects, especially the G1 delay, occur at much higher doses than the adaptive response, and one may not indiscriminately extrapolate mechanisms responsible for cell cycle changes observed at high doses, e.g. for radiation in the order of grays, to those involved in the adaptive responses at much lower doses, i.e. some tens of milligrays.

Persistence of cadmium-induced adaptive response to genotoxicity of maleic hydrazide and methyl mercuric chloride in root meristem cells of Allium cepa L.: differential inhibition by cycloheximide and buthionine sulfoximine

With an objective to determine the period of persistence of the metal-induced adaptive response to chemical mutagens and heavy metals, growing root meristems of Allium cepa were conditioned by cadmium sulfate (CdSO4), 4 x 10(-7) and 4 x 10(-6) M for 1 h and subsequently challenged by maleic hydrazide (MH), 5 x 10(-3) M or methyl mercuric chloride (MMCl), 1.26 x 10(-6) M for 3 h at different time intervals ranging from a few minutes to several hours following the conditioning dose. Root meristems, fixed at regular intervals during recovery from 6 to 48 h, were cytologically analysed for cells with micronuclei (MNC). The adaptive responses to MH and MMCl were observed as early as 5 min after the Cd-conditioning that persisted for at least 48 h. Metabolic inhibitors, cycloheximide (CH). 10(-7) M and buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), 10(-4) M administered either prior to or simultaneous with Cd-conditioning effectively prevented the adaptive response to MH. Whereas BSO, an inhibitor of phytochelatin synthesis, prevented the adaptive responses from 15 min to 8 h after the conditioning dose, CH an inhibitor of cytoplasmic protein synthesis prevented the same from 6 to 48 h. The findings underscored the differential roles of phytochelatins and proteins underlying the foregone metallo-adaptive response.

Radioadaptation for gene mutation and the possible molecular mechanisms of the adaptive response

This paper reviews the experimental results showing that a prior exposure to a low dose of ionising radiation induces an adaptive response expressed as a reduction of gene mutation in various cell systems. The data show that the mutagenic adaptation shares common features with the clastogenic adaptation, i.e., priming dose level, kinds of conditioning agents, time interval between conditioning and challenging treatments, degree of induced protective effect (40-75%), transitory response and inhibition by 3-aminobenzamide, a DNA repair inhibitor. Moreover, the deletion-type mutations are predominantly reduced in adapted cells, suggesting that the mechanism underlying mutagenic adaptation preferentially facilitates the removal of the DNA lesions leading to deletion-type mutations. These lesions are thought to be double-strand breaks which are likely to be also involved in the production of chromosomal damage. Recent findings on the molecular processes implicated in the cellular response to radiation provide some clues for the mechanisms that could be triggered by low-dose exposure and ultimately contribute to the protective effect. There is some evidence that the protein kinase C-mediated signalling pathway is a key step for the transduction of the low-dose-induced signal. Several recent reports indicate that the low-dose triggers changes in the expression of several genes whose products, though most of them are still not identified, would be related to DNA repair and/or control of cell cycle progression.

Interaction of low-dose irradiation with subsequent mutagenic treatment: role of mitotic delay

Experiments were carried out with human lymphocytes to test whether there was any relation between the changes that conditioning treatment can produce in cell progression or in mitotic delay induced by the challenge dose and the presence of an 'adaptive response' (AR). In experiments in which the cells were successively fixed after the challenge dose, the interaction between conditioning treatment and challenge was of the same sign for all the fixation times: therefore it is likely that modifications of the cytogenetic damage in primed cells is not a mere reflection of stage sensitivity. In experiments in which using 1 Gy as conditioning treatment we induced a drastic extension of G2, we did not observe any AR; therefore, even if conditioning treatment can induce modifications in the cell-cycle phases before and/or after challenge, there is probably no link between these modifications and the presence of an AR.

Effects of low-dose (2 cGy) X-ray on cell-cycle kinetics and on induced mitotic delay in human lymphocyte

Experiments were carried out with human lymphocytes to test the effect of low-dosage X-ray irradiation (2 cGy) on cell-cycle kinetics and on the mitotic delay induced by the conditioning pretreatment alone or by a subsequent high dose of X-ray. All the tests were performed using lymphocytes from two donors who had previously displayed considerable differences in the interaction between a low and a high dose of ionizing radiation. A dose of 2 cGy led to significant variations in mitotic indices (MI) which differed for the two donors in relation to variations in the times of irradiation and fixation after stimulation with PHA. Moreover in one of the two donors 4-6 h after challenge the pretreated cultures have a higher MI that the controls; on the other hand, conditioning treatment alone induces in the other donor an extension of both G2 and of the time taken by cells in S at the time of challenge to reach mitosis. These findings could in the future provide some insight into the problem of the variability of the adaptive response in human lymphocytes.

Participation of gap-junctional cell communication on the adaptive response in human cells induced by low dose of X-rays

To investigate the radioadaptive response of normal cells to low-dose radiation, we irradiated human embryonic (HE) cells and HeLa cells with low-dose X-rays and examined the changes in sensitivity to subsequent high-dose X-irradiation using the trypan blue dye-exclusion test. When HE cells were irradiated by 200 cGy, the growth ratio of the living cells 5 days after the irradiation decreased to 37% of that of the cells which received no X-irradiation. When the cells received a conditioning irradiation of 10-20 cGy 4 h before the irradiation of 200 cGy, the relative growth ratios increased significantly to 45-53%, and a peak was reached at a conditioning dose of 13 cGy to the cells. This conditioning effect was not observed in LeLa cells. When the HE cells were suspended in a Ca2+ ion-free medium or TPA added to the medium while receiving the conditioning irradiation of 13 cGy, the effect of the conditioning dose was not observed. This indicates that normal cells show an adaptive response to low-dose radiation and become more radioresistant. These results suggest that gap junctional intercellular communication may play a role in radioadaptive responses in human cells.

On the reaction kinetics of the radioadaptive response in cultured mouse cells

The reaction kinetics of radioadaptive response of low doses of X-rays have been studied in quiescent cultured mouse cells. Mouse m5S cells pre-exposed in G1 to low doses of X-rays became insensitive to the induction of chromosome aberrations, mutation toward 6-thioguanine resistance, and cell killing. Adapted cells were, however, more susceptible to morphological transformation by subsequent high challenging doses of X-rays. The cytogenetic adaptation, which lasted about 20 h pertained to a narrow dose range. X-ray doses below and above 0.1 Gy appeared to be recognized as different signals; higher doses of X-rays were incapable of inducing adaptation and rapidly extinguished the adapted condition. Treatment with 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol 13-acetate (TPA) and hydrogen peroxide, but not the xanthine/xanthine oxidase superoxide-generating system, mimicked X-rays in inducing adaptation when applied at low doses. Over-exposure to TPA or inhibitors of protein kinase C (PKC) abrogated the adaptive response to X-rays, providing evidence for the involvement of a PKC-mediated signalling pathway. The lack of radioadaptive response in a tumorigenic variant, clone 6110, and its restoration in the morphological revertant obtained by introducing human chromosome 11 further suggested that interference of signalling pathways may alter radioadaptive responses in malignant cells.

Application of a multiple fixation regimen to study the adaptive response to ionizing radiation in lymphocytes of two human donors

The majority of experiments studying the adaptive response using chromosomal aberrations have been performed with proliferating lymphocytes. It is known that lymphocytes have variable cell cycle transit times and it has been pointed out that in such cases aberration scores obtained from a single harvest are not very meaningful because cells harvested together in metaphase at any one time after irradiation were in different parts of the cell cycle at the time of irradiation. The scored sample will thus always contain a mixture of cells having different radiosensitivities and any variations of cell proliferation will influence the aberration score. In order to get a more representative aberration score a multiple fixation regimen was applied to lymphocytes of two human donors. Cells receiving the adapting + challenging and the challenging dose were fixed at three intervals after the challenge. In lymphocytes of donor 1 no adaptive response was seen at any fixation time in two experiments. In lymphocytes of donor 2, however, a reduction of aberration frequencies was seen, but at different fixation times in the two experiments. In a third experiment, no adaptive response was detected. It is concluded that the response observed at some fixation times in lymphocytes of donor 2 is rather a result of some phenomenon associated with variations of cell cycle kinetics than of induced radiation resistance.

Radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in mouse 10T1/2 cells: dependence on the cell-cycle stage at the time of irradiation

Cell-cycle stage radiosensitivity for the induction of chromosome aberrations has been investigated in C3H 10T1/2 cells. Exponentially growing cells were irradiated with 3 Gy X-rays (80 kVp) or 0.6 Gy alpha-particles (LET = 101 keV/micron). The two doses produce the same survival level (37%) in the asynchronous population. Cells were harvested at four different times following irradiation and cell-cycle phase at the time of irradiation was assessed by using the differential replication staining technique. The frequency of chromosome aberrations produced in a given stage of the cell cycle was not constant as a function of the sampling time, but this could not be simply related to the existence of subphases exhibiting different radiosensitivity, because of cell-cycle perturbation introduced by radiation. X-radiation induced more exchanges than deletions, whereas a predominance of isochromatid deletions was observed after alpha-irradiation. This can be interpreted on the basis of the different patterns of energy deposition of densely- and sparsely-ionizing radiation. Both X- and alpha-rays produced a significant increase in the frequency of Robertsonian translocations when cells were exposed in G1 or S phase, but not in G2 phase.

Adaptive response to mutagenesis and its molecular basis in a human T-cell leukemia line primed with a low dose of gamma-rays

The effect was studied of a low dose of gamma-ray preexposure on the frequency and molecular spectrum of radiation-induced mutations at the hprt locus in a human T-cell leukemia line. When the cells were preexposed to 0.01 Gy of gamma-rays, the yield of mutations induced by a subsequent 2-Gy challenge dose was reduced by 60%, compared with the 2 Gy of irradiation alone. The data of Southern blot analysis showed that 47% of the mutants induced by 2 Gy in the cells without low-dose preexposure were of the deletion or rearranged mutations type. In contrast, in the low-dose radioadapted cells the proportion of this type of 2-Gy-induced mutations decreased to 28%. This is close to the control level (22%) of spontaneous mutations. Our results confirm that a low dose of gamma-ray preexposure leads to a decreased susceptibility to gene deletions and rearrangements after high-dose irradiation.

Adaptive response to radiation damage in human lymphocytes conditioned with hydrogen peroxide as measured by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique

We have made use of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus method to evaluate the adaptive response in human lymphocytes from two donors conditioned with low doses of hydrogen peroxide before irradiation with either 1.5 or 3.0 Gy of X-rays. A protective effect of pre-exposure to H2O2 against radiation damage detected as micronuclei in binucleate cells was evident in cells allowed to recover for different periods after X-ray exposure, though cells challenged with 3.0 Gy of X-rays showed the adaptive response at later fixation time than those exposed to the lower dose (1.5 Gy). We propose this protocol as an interesting alternative to the single fixation method to score chromosomal aberrations at metaphase for the study of the adaptive response.

Lack of adaptive response to low doses of ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes from five different donors

Various investigators reported a reduced yield of chromosome and chromatid aberrations in short-term cultures of human lymphocytes if a 'challenge' exposure to ionizing radiation was preceded by an 'adaptive' exposure. In order to examine the cell cycle dependence of the 'adaptive response', chromosome and chromatid aberration yields were estimated after challenge doses in the G1, S or G2 phase of lymphocytes which had been adapted in the early G1 phase. On testing two donors no protective adaptive response was found. Blood samples of four donors were tested for their capability to evoke the adaptive response in a standard experiment with the adaptive dose in the S phase and the challenge dose in the G2 phase. A synergistic response occurred in one out of two similar experiments performed with the same blood sample. The three other blood samples tested did not respond. Apparently these data indicate a high frequency of human lymphocyte cultures that do not display an adaptive response.

The effect of X-irradiation on cell cycle progression and chromatid aberrations in stimulated human lymphocytes using cohort analysis studies

Stage sensitivity for the production of chromatid-type aberrations and mitotic delay has been investigated in a stimulated human lymphocyte population, following an absorbed dose of 1.5 Gy 250 kVp X-rays. BrdU replication banding was used to obtain a fine analysis of the cell cycle and to permit cohort analysis. Fluctuations in yield with sample time were found for all aberration categories, but these could not be related simply to either the developmental stage of the cells at time of exposure, or to the time-to-run to metaphase. In general G2 and late S cells had higher aberration yields than early S and pre S cell populations. Mitotic delay and perturbation at this dose extends to all sub-phases of S and is as great, if not greater, in the earliest S cells as it is in G2.