Time of separation of the umbilical cord: a comparative study of treatment with alcohol and Rikospray

Impact of umbilical cord cleansing with 4.0% chlorhexidine on time to cord separation among newborns in southern Nepal: a cluster-randomized, community-based trial

OBJECTIVE

Within a community-based, cluster-randomized study of the effects of 4.0% chlorhexidine on omphalitis and mortality risk, we aimed to describe the distribution of times to separation and the impact of topical chlorhexidine treatment on cord-separation times.

METHODS

Between November 2002 and March 2005, 15123 infants were assigned randomly within communities in southern Nepal to receive 1 of the following 3 cord-care regimens: cleansing with 4.0% chlorhexidine, cleansing with soap and water, or dry cord care. In intervention clusters, field workers cleansed the cord in the home on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 after birth. Newborns were monitored throughout the newborn period for signs of omphalitis, and the time to cord separation was noted. Separation times were compared across treatment groups. Cord infection risk and a range of infant and household characteristics were assessed for their relationships to separation time.

RESULTS

The mean separation time was shorter in dry cord care (4.24 days) and soap/water (4.25 days) clusters than in chlorhexidine clusters (5.32 days; mean difference: 1.08 days). Cords of infants who received chlorhexidine were 3.6 times more likely to separate after 7 days. Separation time was not associated with omphalitis. Home-delivered topical antiseptics, facility-based birth, and birth attendant hand-washing were associated with greater likelihoods of cord separation after 7 days of age.

CONCLUSIONS

In this setting, the umbilical cord separated more rapidly than observed in hospital-based studies, and the impact of chlorhexidine cleansing on separation times was negligible. Increased cord-separation time attributable to topical chlorhexidine treatment should not be considered a factor in decision-making in settings where the baseline risk of omphalitis is high and chlorhexidine might reduce infection and mortality risks significantly.

Umbilical cord care: a pilot study comparing topical human milk, povidone-iodine, and dry care

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of omphalitis among three groups, each using a different type of newborn cord care: povidone-iodine, dry care, and topical human milk.

DESIGN

Case control.

SETTING

A large urban university hospital in Turkey and participant homes after discharge.

PARTICIPANTS

150 healthy, full-term newborns and their mothers.

INTERVENTIONS

Umbilical cord care consisted of one of three methods: topical application of povidone-iodine twice daily, topical application of mother's milk twice daily, or dry care (keeping the cord dry and clean).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Outcome was measured in terms of the presence or absence of omphalitis and the number of days elapsed before cord separation. An ongoing questionnaire was administered by telephone every other day after the participants left the hospital. In addition to demographic information, the cord separation day and any signs of omphalitis were recorded in the questionnaire.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the three groups in terms of omphalitis occurrence. Two cases of omphalitis were observed (one in the human milk group, one in the povidone-iodine group). Interestingly, babies in the dry care or topical human milk group had shorter cord separation times than those in the povidone-iodine group.

CONCLUSION

The cultural practice of applying human milk to the umbilical cord stump appears to have no adverse effects and is associated with shorter cord separation times than are seen with the use of antiseptics.

Maternal perceptions of newborn umbilical cord treatments and healing

OBJECTIVE

To determine mothers' cord care practices and perceptions of their newborns' cord treatment and healing.

DESIGN

Exploratory, descriptive.

SETTING

Urban teaching hospital providing care for children, women, and families in eastern Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 30 women with healthy full-term infants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mothers' concerns about newborn umbilical cord care and cord treatments using an 18-item questionnaire, the Cord Rating Scale.

RESULTS

Mothers' concerns regarding their newborns' cord included bleeding at the time of cord separation and cord odor. Several mothers (20%) did not recall being given information on cord care, and others had received conflicting information. Although most other mothers did begin the recommended treatment, they did not follow the recommended schedule. There was a strong positive relationship between the mothers' and nurses' ratings of the newborns' cord condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that mothers continue to have concerns about their newborn's cord and cord care after hospital discharge. These concerns have implications for nursing practice. The findings also support the role that a mother has in accurately reporting the condition of her newborn's cord.

Care of the umbilical cord after birth: A limited review of recent literature

A 1992 meta-analysis did not find enough evidence to recommend one method of umbilical cord care as the 'best'. However, certain agents were deemed acceptable including triple dye, silver sulfadiazine and antibiotic ointments. In this paper, the authors sought to discover whether there was now evidence to support one specific method of cord care over others for the prevention of bacterial infection. After a limited search of the English language literature published in the past 10 years, little evidence was found to suggest that treatments to sterilize or speed up the drying of the umbilical cord were either routinely necessary or efficacious. Results from nine studies are summarized in this paper.

Cleaning solutions and bacterial colonization in promoting healing and early separation of the umbilical cord in healthy newborns

The efficacy of alcohol or water in promoting umbilical cord separation was compared in a randomized controlled trial. Rates of skin colonization between groups were also evaluated on three occasions. Time to cord separation, rates of colonization, and species of organisms that colonized were compared between groups. Of 148 participants, 136 (92%) completed the protocol. Cords that were cleaned with sterile water separated more quickly than those cleaned with alcohol (t = 3.15, p = 0.002). Between-group differences in colonization rates were not found (F = 1.59, df = 2, p = 0.205). Umbilical or other infections did not occur. Bacterial colonization of the umbilical area and surrounding skin occurs over time in healthy term neonates. Cleaning with alcohol will increase the length of time from birth to cord separation but will not prevent colonization of the umbilical area.