Medication during low-risk pregnancy

Drug prescription patterns before, during and after pregnancy for chronic, occasional and pregnancy-related drugs in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prescription of drugs in women over a period from 2 years before until 3 months after pregnancy, regarding the type of drugs used and the fetal risk.

DESIGN

A cohort study based on pharmacy records of women giving birth to a child between 1994 and 2003.

SETTING

The study was performed with data from the InterAction database, containing prescription-drug-dispensing data from community pharmacies.

POPULATION

The study population included 5412 women for whom complete pharmacy records were available.

METHODS

Drugs were classified into three categories: (1) drugs for chronic conditions, (2) drugs for occasional use and (3) drugs for pregnancy-related symptoms and also classified according to the Australian classification system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prescription rate was calculated as the number of women per 100 women who received one or more prescriptions for a given drug within a specified time period.

RESULTS

About 79.1% of the women received at least one prescription during pregnancy. The prescription rate for most drugs for chronic diseases and for occasional use decreased during pregnancy, whereas, as expected, the prescription rate for pregnancy-related drugs increased. During the first trimester of pregnancy, 1.7% of all drugs prescribed for chronic conditions and 2.3% of the occasional drugs were classified as harmful.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in prescription rate during pregnancy is caused by an increase in prescription rate of drugs for pregnancy-related symptoms. The prescription of harmful drugs is more commonly associated with drugs for occasional use rather than with drugs for chronic conditions. Therefore, a more cautious prescribing of drugs to healthy women in the fertile age is necessary.

Drug use by pregnant women and comparable non-pregnant women in The Netherlands with reference to the Australian classification system

OBJECTIVE

To describe drug use in pregnancy, and compare drug use of pregnant women with non-pregnant women with respect to possible teratogenicity.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study based on pharmacy records from 1997 to 2001 was performed. Pregnant women and matched non-pregnant women (same physician and age) were identified. Prescriptions were set against the Australian risk classification.

RESULTS

Thirty-five percent of all prescriptions for non-pregnant women were safe in pregnancy (Australian classification A), in 14% the risk was unknown (B1, B2), 49% were potentially harmful drugs (B3, C, D, X), and in 3% no classification was available. For pregnant women these figures were 86, 3, 10 and 2%, respectively. In non-pregnant women the highest percentages of prescriptions for unsafe drugs were for psycholeptics (99% not classified as safe), psychoanaleptics (100%), anti-inflammatory/antirheumetic products (100%), antihistamines (94%), antacids/anti-ulcer drugs (81%), antiepileptics (100%), beta-blockers (100%), systemic antimycotics (100%), antiprotozoals (97%), diuretics (100%) and immunosuppressives (100%). In pregnant women this pattern was comparable, except for antihistamines (22%) and antacids/anti-ulcer drugs (3%).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that many drugs used by non-pregnant women should be avoided in pregnancy, and that pregnant women indeed do so. However, for some drug groups the available safe alternatives are limited.

Patterns of medication use during and prior to pregnancy: the MAP study

We interviewed 140 pregnant women of any gestational age attending antenatal clinics at the Women's and Children's Hospital in Adelaide during September-October 1999 to elicit information about their patterns of medication use during and in the 3 months prior to their current pregnancy. Demographic information, information on women's prescribed, non-prescribed, and non-medicinal drug use during and in the 3 months prior to pregnancy, and information about both their general sources of information on medication use and their specific reasons for medication uptake/cessation during pregnancy were obtained. The women used an average of 0.7 0.8 prescribed and 2.3-2.6 non-prescribed medications (total 3.1-3.3) in the 3 pregnancy trimesters, compared with 1.0 prescribed and 2.2 non-prescribed prior to pregnancy. Use of a prescribed or non-prescribed medication was 96-97% across trimesters. Simple analgesics, vitamin/mineral supplements, and antacids were the most commonly taken medications. Antibiotics were the most commonly prescribed medication. Use of class A medications increased during pregnancy while use of non-class A medications decreased. Peri-conceptional folate supplementation was 31%. Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking decreased after diagnosis of pregnancy. Both prescribed and non-prescribed medication use is common during all trimesters of pregnancy. However, overall use changes little compared with pre-pregnancy values. Rates of peri-conceptional folate supplementation are low.

Prepregnancy care and prevention of birth defects

Birth defects and disturbances in growth and development need an increasing attention in perinatal medicine. It is remarkable that so little attention has been paid to the pathogenesis of malformations in the literature in an approach to find aspects of prevention. Primary prevention of birth defects is an important public health issue as malformations have important consequences both for society and the individuals concerned. Prepregnancy care as a logical precursor to antenatal care, offers risk-assessment, advice and occasionally treatment before pregnancy, in order to avoid congenital malformations. It is therefore that we started a research program with emphasis on primary prevention of congenital malformations. In this respect medication, maternal nutritional status, diabetes mellitus and neural tube defects are discussed.