A prospective randomized trial comparing periapical instrumentation to intracanal instrumentation in cases of asymptomatic pulpal-periapical lesions

Effectiveness of root canal instrumentation for the treatment of apical periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The development of endodontic instruments has rapidly advanced, but their impact on endodontic outcome parameters remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to answer the following PICOT questions: In patients with apical periodontitis (P) what is the effectiveness of root canal instrumentation ([Q1] performed with contemporary techniques [I] in comparison with 'traditional' techniques [C]] and ([Q2] performed with contemporary engine-driven NiTi instruments [I] compared with other types of contemporary engine-driven NiTi instruments [with different design and/or technology] [C]) in terms of clinical and patient-related outcomes (O)?

METHODS

After PROSPERO protocol registration, a literature search was conducted using Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Grey literature and major journal contents were examined. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction and appraisal of included studies. A quantitative meta-analysis was considered, and statistical heterogeneity and overall quality of evidence were assessed.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified showing substantial methodological differences. Five studies addressed PICOT 1 and three PICOT 2, whereas one study aimed both. A random-effects meta-analysis model was considered for the outcome 'radiographic evidence of normal periodontal ligament space or reduction of apical lesion size' (PICOT 1) based on three studies with 332 evaluable participants and showed that contemporary instrumentation was associated with a more favourable outcome (p = .005) compared with root canal preparation with stainless steel instruments (odds ratio = 2.07 [95%-confidence interval = 1.25-3.44]) with no evidence of statistical heterogeneity (I2  = 0%) but low quality of evidence.

DISCUSSION

Albeit a few studies fulfilled eligible criteria, no study had a low risk of bias. Compelling evidence indicating significantly different outcome rates using different endodontic instruments when treating teeth with apical periodontitis is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of healing, the results of the meta-analysis determined the higher effectiveness of root canal instrumentation performed with contemporary techniques in comparison with conventional stainless steel instruments in patients with apical periodontitis followed for a minimum of 1 year with low quality of evidence. No differences could be demonstrated between preparations with traditional stainless steel and contemporary NiTi instruments for other clinical and patient-related outcomes.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42021274642).

The effect of antibiotic use on endodontic post-operative pain and flare-up rate: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Aim Antibiotics are widely used to prevent flare-ups after endodontic treatment of non-vital teeth. This systematic review assessed the effect of antibiotic administration on post-endodontic treatment pain and flare-up rate.Methods Five major databases including Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus and Embase were searched to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) published until September 2020. Retrieved papers were critically appraised using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2). To reduce the clinical heterogeneity, the included studies were divided into two groups: studies on symptomatic non-vital teeth and studies on asymptomatic non-vital teeth. The primary outcomes were 'post-operative pain' and 'flare-up rate'. The data of included studies were statistically combined through meta-analysis using random-effect model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of evidence.Results Six RCTs involving two RCTs (N = 61) on symptomatic teeth and four RCTs (N = 310) on asymptomatic teeth were included. In two RCTs on asymptomatic teeth, prophylactic antibiotic had been used, while in the remaining two RCTs, antibiotics had been administered after treatment. Quantitative synthesis of the RCTs showed that antibiotic administration following endodontic treatment of symptomatic non-vital teeth has no effect on pain severity at 24 hours following treatment (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.53 to 0.47), and the use of antibiotics before endodontic treatment of asymptomatic non-vital teeth has no effect on flare-up rate (relative risk [RR] = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.22-1.54). The GRADE approach revealed that the overall quality of evidence on the topic is low.Conclusions The antibiotic administration following endodontic treatment of symptomatic non-vital teeth has no effect on pain severity at 24 hours following treatment. Also, prophylactic antibiotics are ineffective in reducing the flare-up rate following treatment of asymptomatic non-vital teeth. However, to evaluate the effect of post-treatment antibiotics on flare-up rate in asymptomatic non-vital teeth, more high-quality RCTs are needed.

Effect of photobiomodulation on post-operative symptoms in teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis treated with foraminal enlargement: A randomized clinical trial

AIM

To assess the efficacy of photobiomodulation in reducing post-operative symptoms and use of analgesics in teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis treated with foraminal enlargement in a single visit.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective double-blind, controlled, superiority, randomized clinical trial enrolled 70 patients requiring root canal treatment of one single-rooted tooth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The participants were randomized into one of the following two groups: 35 patients in the control group (C.G) - root canal treatment with foraminal enlargement, without any additional treatment and 35 patients in the photobiomodulation group (PBM.G) - root canal treatment with foraminal enlargement associated with photobiomodulation (antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and low-level laser therapy). The outcome variables were post-operative pain, tenderness, oedema and the use of analgesics. Pain intensity was measured using a visual analogue scale (recorded every day for 7 days, then the 14th and 30th days after root canal treatment). Facial oedema was assessed subjectively by two independent evaluators using photographs taken by one of the researchers at 48 h, 72 h and 7 days after the procedures. Data were tabulated and analysed using the Mann-Whitney U, Chi-Square, Fisher`s Exact, Student T and Ordinal Logistic Regression by Generalized Estimating Equations tests in SPSS software.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in post-operative pain and tenderness between the groups at any observation period (p > .05). Photobiomodulation (beta = -0.77 / p = .01), time (beta = -0.23 / p < .01), and male gender (beta = -1.20 / p < .01) were associated with decreased post-operative pain. Only time (beta: -0.10; p < .01) and male gender (beta: -1.04; p < .01) were associated with decreased tenderness. For oedema and use of analgesics, there was no difference between the groups (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Photobiomodulation had no significant effect on post-operative pain, tenderness, oedema and the use of analgesics after root canal treatment with foraminal enlargement, in single-rooted teeth treated in a single visit. Register of Clinical Trials: NCT03704857. Research Ethics Committee: no 2.353.996 / CAAE 74185417.9.0000.5626.

Cross-sectional evaluation of post-operative pain and flare-ups in endodontic treatments using a type of rotary instruments

AIM

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the general incidence of post-operative pain and flare-ups in patients who were endodontically treated by two endodontics specialists using rotary instruments (Hero 642, Micro Mega, France) with the same treatment protocol.

METHODS

Records of 382 teeth belonging to 268 patients treated by two endodontics specialists during a 6-month period were kept and evaluated. Post-operative pain between treatment visits was categorized using a pre-established scoring system. Ninety-five patients were males, whereas 173 were females.

RESULTS

Pulpal necrosis without periapical pathosis was determined as the most common indication for endodontic treatment (21.7%) followed by irreversible pulpitis and re-treatment without periapical lesions (18.3%, 18.3%, respectively). The general prevalence of post-operative pain and flare-ups was determined as 8.1%, whereas cases that could be classified as real flare-ups which were severe and required an unscheduled visit (scores 2 and 3) comprised 3.4% of the cases. No statistically significant correlation was determined between gender and post-operative pain and flare-up (p = 0.05). There was a significant correlation between number of appointments and the presence of pain and flare-ups. Teeth undergoing multiple visits had a higher risk of developing post-operative pain and flare-ups compared to those with single appointments with a statistical significance (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Teeth with pre-operative pain were more prone to developing post-operative pain and discomfort with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.02). While no significant correlation was determined between tooth vitality and pain and flare-ups (p = 0.5), a statistically significant relationship existed between the presence of a periapical pathosis and post-operative pain and flare-ups. Cases with a periapical lesion had a higher risk of developing pain and flare-ups compared to those with no periapical involvement (p = 0.0001). Future studies may focus on the influence of rotary instrumentation systems in more specific groups of cases. Meanwhile; microbiological as well as psychological aspects of flare-ups are topics that warrant further investigation.

Prevalence of and factors affecting post-obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment

AIM

This longitudinal, prospective study (1) investigated the prevalence of post-obturation pain after root canal treatment and (2) evaluated the influence of factors affecting the pain experience.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty practitioners, comprising general dental practitioners, MSc graduates and Endodontists, participated in this study. The patient sample (n = 415) was derived from consecutive patients attending the practitioners' surgeries for root canal treatment on a single tooth. Demographic, medical history, preoperative and intra-operative data as well as pain experience on day 1 and day 2 after root canal obturation were recorded. Intensity of pain experienced was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0-5. The data were analysed using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The prevalence of post-obturation pain within 48 h after treatment was 40.2% (n = 167) but less than 12% of patients experienced severe pain (VAS 4 or 5) on either day 1 or day 2. The factors that significantly influenced post-obturation pain experience were: gender (OR = 0.434, P < 0.001), tooth type (OR = 1.733, P = 0.007), size of periapical lesion (OR = 0.493, P = 0.004), history of post-preparation pain (OR = 4.110, P = <0.001) or generalized swelling (OR = 3.435, P = 0.005) and number of treatment visits (OR = 2.604, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of post-obturation pain was high (40.2%). The important prognostic determinants of post-obturation pain were female, molar tooth, size of periapical lesion smaller than 3 mm, history of post-preparation pain or generalized swelling and single-visit treatment.

Leaving the pulp chamber open for drainage has no effect on the complications of root canal therapy

In this retrospective study the effects of different kinds of emergency treatments on flare-ups and other complications were examined. A total of 197 teeth received emergency treatment after diagnosis at the beginning of the root canal therapy; in 103 the pulp chamber was left open for drainage of pus, 35 were treated with dexamethasone sodium phosphate, and 59 with various other medicaments, followed by routine root canal treatment. In all, 404 teeth received root canal treatment without emergency treatment. If symptoms occurred during treatment, flare-up was said to be present. If a periapical radiolucency was found, long-term calcium hydroxide treatment was used: no sign of periapical healing radiographically after 6 months was described as a complication. The percentage of teeth with no complications varied from 72.2% (dexamethasone) to 78.9% (other modification) and the results showed no differences between the groups in the teeth with no complications, flare-ups or other complications. The number of bacteria detected with Gram's staining was higher in the teeth which were left open. In conclusion, leaving the pulp chamber open for drainage had no effect on the incidence of flare-ups or other complications.

Endodontic interappointment flare-ups: a prospective study of incidence and related factors

Severe pain and/or swelling following a root canal treatment appointment are serious sequelae. Information varies or is incomplete as to the incidence of these conditions and related factors. In this study, data were collected at root canal treatment appointments on demographics, pulp/periapical diagnoses, presenting symptoms, treatment procedures, and number of appointments. Patients that then experienced a flare-up (a severe problem requiring an unscheduled visit and treatment) had the correlating factors examined. Statistical determinations were by chi-square analysis with significance at 0.05 or less. Nine hundred forty-six visits resulted in an incidence of 3.17% flare-ups. Flare-ups were positively correlated with more severe presenting symptoms, pulp necrosis with painful apical pathosis, and patients on analgesics. Fewer flare-ups occurred in undergraduate patients and following obturation procedures. There was no correlation between patient demographics or systemic conditions, number of appointments, treatment procedures, or taking antibiotics.

Relationship of intracanal medicaments to endodontic flare-ups

The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of three intracanal medicaments on the incidence of post-instrumentation flare-ups. All teeth were instrumented to a predetermined minimum size using a 0.5% solution of sodium hypochlorite as the irrigant. Formocresol, Ledermix, and calcium hydroxide were placed in strict sequence irrespective of the presence or absence of symptoms or radiographic signs of apical periodontitis. The patients were given written post-operative instructions and a prescription for 600 mg ibuprofen to be taken if mild to moderate pain developed. If severe pain and/or swelling developed the patient was instructed to call the office immediately and was considered to have had a flare-up. Twelve flare-ups occurred in teeth with radiographic signs of apical periodontitis; none in teeth without periapical radiolucencies. Six of the twelve flare-ups occurred in retreatment cases and the other six occurred in teeth without previous endodontic treatment. No significant difference was found in the flare-up rate among the three intracanal medicaments.

A clarification on endodontic flare-ups

In an article on endodontic flare-ups by Robert J. Matusow, our research and publications are discussed. Since we found what we consider to be distortions and misinterpretations of our work, it was decided to clarify the apparent discrepancies found in Matusow's article.

Comparison of prophylactic and on-demand diflunisal for pain management of patients having one-visit endodontic therapy

To determine whether the posttreatment prophylactic use of diflunisal (Dolobid 500) would be more effective than the on-demand use of diflunisal in reducing endodontic posttreatment pain, the current open-label, randomized study was undertaken. After one-visit nonsurgical endodontic therapy, 100 patients with asymptomatic teeth having either vital-inflamed pulp, pulpal necrosis, or pulpal necrosis with periapical radiolucent lesion were randomly given either prophylactic diflunisal (two tablets immediately at the conclusion of the visit, then four tablets to be taken in the schedule of one every 8 to 12 hours for pain if needed) or on-demand diflunisal (same dosage schedule; pills to be taken only if needed). The outcome showed that compared to the on-demand usage, the posttreatment prophylactic administration of diflunisal resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of episodes of endodontic posttreatment pain that required analgesic intervention. It appears from the results of this study that the posttreatment prophylactic use of diflunisal is significantly more effective than the on-demand usage of diflunisal in reducing endodontic posttreatment pain for one-visit endodontic therapy with all types of originally asymptomatic endodontic conditions. Further studies are necessary to determine whether pretreatment prophylactic deflunisal would be more effective, and also the effectiveness of prophylactic diflunisal in reducing posttreatment pain in presenting symptomatic cases and for cases treated in multiple visits.

A comparison of erythromycin and cefadroxil in the prevention of flare-ups from asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and associated periapical pathosis

In a previous study by our group with patients having asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and an associated periapical radiolucent lesion (PN/PL), it was shown that prophylactic administration of penicillin V or erythromycin (high-dose, 1-day regimen) resulted in a low incidence of flare-up (mean = 2.2%) and a low incidence of swelling and pain not associated with flare-up. No hypersensitivity responses occurred, and gastrointestinal side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins. To ascertain whether a single-dose administration of a long-acting 1-gm tablet of the cephalosporin antibiotic cefadroxil would result in a similar outcome, the present study was undertaken with 200 patients having quiescent PN/PL. The patients were randomly given either cefadroxil or erythromycin (base or stearate). Evaluations of flare-up were done 1 day, 1 week, and 2 months after endodontic treatment. A 2.0% flare-up incidence was found, with no statistically significant differences for cefadroxil (1.0%), stearate (2.0%), or base (4.0%). No hypersensitivity responses occurred. Gastrointestinal side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins (19.0%). The results showed that a 1-gm, single-dose regimen of cefadroxil was as effective as erythromycin and penicillin in preventing flare-ups and serious sequelae. A comparative analysis of the data from our first study (no peritreatment antibiotics) and the pooled data from our last three investigations (including the current trial) showed that peritreatment antibiotic coverage significantly reduced flare-ups and serious sequelae after endodontic treatment of asymptomatic PN/PL (p less than 0.001).

A prospective randomized double-blind trial on efficacy of dexamethasone for endodontic interappointment pain in teeth with asymptomatic inflamed pulps

To determine whether a relatively large dose of oral dexamethasone given for a short period of time would be effective in reducing endodontic interappointment pain, the current double-blind, placebo-controlled study was undertaken. After the visit for instrumentation, 40 patients with asymptomatic teeth having vital-inflamed pulps were randomly given either dexamethasone (3 tablets of 4 mg each) or a dextrose placebo identical in appearance (same dosage schedule). The outcome showed that the oral administration of dexamethasone resulted in a statistically significant reduction in endodontic interappointment pain at all three time periods evaluated, that is, at 8 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours (p less than 0.01). It appears from the results of this study that this dosage schedule of oral dexamethasone is sufficient to significantly reduce endodontic interappointment pain for teeth with asymptomatic vital-inflamed pulps. Further studies are needed for teeth with other endodontic pulpal-periapical conditions and for symptomatic teeth.

A prospective randomized trial on efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and associated periapical pathosis

A recent study from a private endodontic practice compared "prophylactic" antibiotic (high-dose, 1-day) regimens of penicillin V and erythromycin (base or stearate) for patients who had asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and associated periapical radiolucent lesions (PN/PL). A 2.2% flare-up incidence was found, with no statistically significant differences for penicillin (0.0%), base (2.9%), and stearate (3.8%). No hypersensitivity responses occurred, and gastrointestinal side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins (12.4%). To ascertain whether or not similar results would occur with student operators in a dental school clinic population, the current study was undertaken. One-hundred ninety-five patients with quiescent PN/PL were randomly given either penicillin V or erythromycin (base or stearate). A 2.6% flare-up incidence was found, with no statistically significant differences for penicillin (3.1%), base (1.5%), and stearate (3.1%). No hypersensitivity responses occurred, and GI side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins (17.7%). As can be seen, the results were very similar to those of the recent endodontic practice study. Hence, it can be concluded that the results of the previous endodontic practice study were not unique to any one clinician or method. A comparison was also made between the "prophylactic" penicillin group of the current study and the placebo control group of our previous dental school clinic, student operator study (in which the methods, population, and regimen were almost identical to those of the current study). The results showed that the "prophylactic" penicillin group had significant fewer flare-ups and non-flare-up-associated swelling and pain than did the placebo group. In view of these findings and those from studies from the literature in which "prophylactic" antibiotics were not used, it is our opinion that the antibiotic regimens used in the current study should be a component of clinical endodontic therapy for quiescent PN/PL.

Prophylactic penicillin versus penicillin taken at the first sign of swelling in cases of asymptomatic pulpal-periapical lesions: a comparative analysis

In order to ascertain whether the time of administration of an antibiotic affects the occurrence of flare-ups and non-flare-up-associated swelling and pain, an analysis of components of two prospective endodontic studies on patients having asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and associated periapical radiolucent lesions (PN/PL) was done. In the first study, prophylactic penicillin was used. In the second study, penicillin (or erythromycin for patients allergic to penicillin) was taken by the patient at the first sign of swelling (patient controlled). For the patient-controlled group, as compared to the prophylactic penicillin group, there was statistically significantly more (1) incidence of flare-ups (p less than 0.05); (2) non-flare-up-associated swelling (p less than 0.001); (3) non-flare-up-associated pain (p less than 0.05); (4) combined moderate and severe pain (p less than 0.05); (5) combined incidence of flare-ups and swelling (p less than 0.001); (6) combined incidence of flare-ups and pain (p less than 0.01); and (7) combined incidence of flare-ups and both swelling and pain (p less than 0.001). There were statistically significantly fewer instances of (1) no patient post-treatment problems (p less than 0.001) and (2) combined mild pain and no patient post-treatment problems (p less than 0.001). Hence, for asymptomatic teeth with PN/PL, it appears that prophylactic antibiotics are preferable to antibiotics taken by the patient at the first sign of swelling.