Direct immunofluorescence of detached gingival epithelium for diagnosis of cicatricial pemphigoid. Report of five cases

Pemphigus vulgaris and mucous membrane pemphigoid: A systematic review of clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) are mucocutaneous autoimmune diseases characterized by blistering lesions of mucous membranes and skin, with very similar clinical manifestations. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the clinical and demographic profile, diagnostic methods, and treatment of patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). Studies describing cases of PV and MMP diagnosed by direct immunofluorescence that exhibited intraoral manifestations were included. Thirty-two articles were included, with 18 studies on PV and 15 on MMP, corresponding to 50 and 123 cases diagnosed as PV and MMP, respectively. Most patients with PV (64%) and MMP (81.3%) were women in the fifth and sixth decade of life, respectively. The mouth was the primary site of involvement both in PV (71.4%) and in MMP (91%). The cheek mucosa and gingiva were the most frequently affected intraoral sites in PV (30%) and MMP (64.2%), respectively. Direct immunofluorescence was positive for IgG in all cases of the two conditions. The treatment of choice was systemic corticosteroid therapy for patients with PV (50%) and topical treatment for patients with MMP (53.7%). Differences in intraoral site predilection, extraoral involvement, and the results of diagnostic tests allow us to trace the clinical, demographic, and diagnostic profile of PV and MMP that contributes to differential diagnosis and therapeutic management.

The optimal oral biopsy site for diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Accepted 'standard practice' for the diagnosis of immunobullous disease is a perilesional sample for direct immunofluorescence (DIF).

OBJECTIVES

To compare diagnostic outcomes of a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) with a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and pemphigus vulgaris (PV).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 251 DIF-positive patients with MMP and 77 DIF-positive patients with PV was undertaken. Parameters analysed included the intraoral sites of involvement and histopathological, DIF and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) findings.

RESULTS

For MMP, PLB was positive in 134 of 143 (93·7%) samples, compared with 129 of 144 (89·6%) by NBPB. The diagnostic sensitivities for PLB (81%, 39 of 48) and NBPB (77%, 37 of 48) among 48 patients who underwent both techniques were not significantly different (P = 0·62). In gingival-only MMP, PLB was positive in 63 of 69 (91%) and NBPB was positive in 63 of 75 (84%). For multisite MMP, PLB was positive in 71 of 74 (96%) and NBPB was positive in 66 of 69 (96%). In gingival-only MMP, biopsies from reflected alveolar mucosa in 17 consecutive patients were positive in 17 of 17 cases (100%). For PV, PLB was positive in 42 of 43 (98%), compared with 42 of 42 (100%) by NBPB. Histopathology was diagnostic in 93 of 134 (69·4%) cases of MMP and 38 of 41 (93%) cases of PV. IIF was positive in 126 of 197 (64·0%) MMP and 68 of 74 (92%) PV patient sera.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest series of combined oral DIF results in patients with MMP and PV, we have shown that NBPB is equivalent to PLB for the diagnosis of PV and multisite MMP, and is more sensitive than both histology and IIF. What's already known about this topic? The variation in sensitivity of oral biopsy sites for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) in the diagnosis of oral MMP and PV has not been studied in detail in large series of patients. Biopsy can be challenging due to difficult access and fragility of the oral mucosa. The diagnostic biopsy technique is therefore critical. What does this study add? We have shown that a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) from uninvolved oral mucosa is as sensitive as a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for diagnosis of oral PV, and superior to serology and histology. For multisite MMP, NBPB is equivalent to PLB and is more sensitive than serology and histology. The oral punch biopsy technique on uninvolved buccal mucosa tissue is a simple and safe practical method for diagnosing oral PV and MMP.

[Autoimmune bullous diseases with gingival expression: A proposed non-iatrogenic gingival biopsy technique]

BACKGROUND

Gingival expression of autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) may be inaugural, exclusive or dominant (mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris). Histology and direct immunofluorescence are essential to diagnosis. The location of the biopsy and the surgical technique determine the histological quality of the tissue sample. However, gingival tissue is often considered fragile and easily impaired during biopsy. We suggest an original biopsy protocol for the gingival papillae that is simple to perform, non-iatrogenic, and readily accessible to all practitioners who usually treat AIBD patients presenting isolated gingival expression (dermatologists, stomatologists, odontology specialists, ENT specialists).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study from 2012 to 2017 identifying all patients presenting AIBD with gingival expression for whom we performed papillary gingival biopsy for diagnostic ends. Our main objective was to determine the diagnostic efficacy and safety of this surgical technique.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 34 papillary gingival biopsies were taken from 19 patients : 15 for histopathological examination and 19 for direct immunofluorescence. Of the 34 biopsies, only one could not be properly analyzed due to lack of epithelium and a second tissue sample was therefore necessary. No short- or long-term complications occurred during post-operative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Gingival papilla biopsy is perfectly suited to the histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations needed for diagnosis of AIBD with isolated gingival expression. This surgical technique shows great efficacy and very good safety. However, additional studies are necessary to confirm our preliminary results, in particular the absence of iatrogenic effects.

Oral mucosal diseases: Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Subepithelial vesiculobullous conditions are chronic autoimmune disorders that arise from reactions directed against components of the hemidesmosomes or basement membrane zones (BMZ) of stratified squamous epithelium to which the term immune-mediated subepithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has been given. Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is the most common, but variants do exist. Non-immune disorders that involve these epithelial components typically have a genetic basis--the main example being epidermolysis bullosa. All subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders present as blisters and erosions, and diagnosis must be confirmed by biopsy examination with immunostaining, sometimes supplemented by other investigations. No single treatment reliably controls all subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders; the immunological differences within IMSEBD may account for differences in responses to treatment. Currently, as well as improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory treatment is used to control the oral lesions of MMP, but it is not known if its specific subsets reliably respond to different agents.

Number III Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorder. It is now quite evident that a number of sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorders may produce similar clinical pictures, and also that a range of variants of MMP exist, with antibodies directed against various hemidesmosomal components or components of the epithelial basement membrane. The term immune-mediated sub-epithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has therefore been used. Immunological differences may account for the significant differences in their clinical presentation and responses to therapy, but unfortunately data on this are few. The diagnosis and management of IMSEBD on clinical grounds alone is impossible and a full history, general, and oral examination, and biopsy with immunostaining are now invariably required, sometimes supplemented with other investigations. No single treatment regimen reliably controls all these disorders, and it is not known if the specific subsets of MMP will respond to different drugs. Currently, apart from improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory-especially immunosuppressive-therapy is typically used to control oral lesions. The present paper reviews pemphigoid, describing the present understanding of this fascinating clinical phenotype, summarising the increasing number of subsets with sometimes-different natural histories and immunological features, and outlining current clinical practice.

Advanced diagnostic methods in oral and maxillofacial pathology. Part II: immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent methods

The practice of pathology is currently undergoing significant change, in large part due to advances in the analysis of DNA, RNA, and proteins in tissues. These advances have permitted improved biologic insights into many developmental, inflammatory, metabolic, infectious, and neoplastic diseases. Moreover, molecular analysis has also led to improvements in the accuracy of disease diagnosis and classification. It is likely that, in the future, these methods will increasingly enter into the day-to-day diagnosis and management of patients. The pathologist will continue to play a fundamental role in diagnosis and will likely be in a pivotal position to guide the implementation and interpretation of these tests as they move from the research laboratory into diagnostic pathology. The purpose of this 2-part series is to provide an overview of the principles and applications of current molecular biologic and immunologic tests. In Part I, the biologic fundamentals of DNA, RNA, and proteins and methods that are currently available or likely to become available to the pathologist in the next several years for their isolation and analysis in tissue biopsies were discussed. In Part II, advances in immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence methods and their application to modern diagnostic pathology are reviewed.

Cicatricial pemphigoid

Cicatricial pemphigoid (CP) is a heterogeneous group of rare, chronic, subepithelial blistering disorders of the mucous membranes and, occasionally, the skin, which can have serious and rarely fatal consequences. The most common clinical features are desquamative gingivitis, oral erosions, and conjunctival fibrosis. Skin lesions occur less frequently and may present as widespread vesicles and bullae, as in bullous pemphigoid (BP). In some patients, the scarring can be a source of significant morbidity because it can result in odynophagia, strictures of the upper aerodigestive tract, or corneal opacities leading to eventual blindness. This article is a comprehensive review and discusses clinical, pathologic, and pathophysiologic aspects of this group of disorders collectively known as CP. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43:571-91.)

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the clinical spectrum of CP, the histopathologic and immunopathologic characteristics, the differential diagnosis, the treatment, and the natural history of the disease. Furthermore, this learning activity should facilitate early diagnosis of CP and should promote the idea that the involvement of other specialists, including ophthalmologists, otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and oral medicine specialists, as appropriate, will aid in providing these patients with the highest quality of care.

Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of oral pemphigoid: a selective review of the literature

Pemphigoid is a group of bullous diseases that have a diversified morphologic presentation and affect the skin, oral mucosa, and other mucosal membranes, alone or in combination. In the literature, the condition has been subclassified into bullous pemphigoid and cicatricial pemphigoid (mucous membrane pemphigoid) on the basis of the primary organ of involvement. In addition to the clinical presentation and a subepithelial vesicle or bullae on routine histologic analysis, the diagnosis is based on direct and indirect immunofluorescence studies. Recent investigations indicate that different clinical groups of patients with pemphigoid produce autoantibodies to different molecules within the basement membrane zone. Based on these recent observations and a review of the literature, a viewpoint is presented that not all patients with cicatricial pemphigoid should be grouped together. Rather, they should be classified into subgroups-ocular, oral, etc-on the basis of the clinical phenotype and long-term follow-up. Such a division will facilitate the provision of appropriate and relevant treatment plans; if the clinical course changes, the diagnosis can be adjusted. This strategy will prevent patients with disease limited to the oral cavity from receiving systemic drugs or agents that may be more harmful than beneficial.

Mucocutaneous features of autoimmune blistering diseases

This review will describe adult onset mucocutaneous/autoimmune diseases that involve defects in cell-to-cell, cell-to-matrix, or cell-to-basement membrane adhesion. Included in this group are pemphigus, cicatricial pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and bullous systemic lupus erythematous. Detection and treatment of blistering disorders that manifest early in the oral cavity may prevent widespread involvement of skin. During the past few years, targets of autoantibodies have been clarified and new targets have been identified, allowing better understanding of the pathophysiology involved in these diseases. New information about more effective regimens with fewer side effects has also been obtained, presenting new treatment options. Clinical manifestations and management of these disorders will be described as well as histopathologic, ultrastructural, and immunopathologic studies that distinguish each disorder and facilitate diagnosis and treatment.

Vesiculobullous disease of the oral cavity

This article reviews the clinical features of vesiculobullous diseases with oral manifestations. Oral vesiculobullous diseases may be viral, immunologically mediated, drug induced, hereditary, or traumatic in origin. A general approach to the diagnosis is outlined, including immunofluorescent testing of suspected vesiculobullous disease. Recommendations for treatment of oral vesiculobullous diseases are included.