Effects of midbrain reticular formation, hippocampal, and lateral hypothalamic stimulation upon recovery from neophobia and taste aversion learning

Cholinergic dependence of taste memory formation: Evidence of two distinct processes

Learning the aversive or positive consequences associated with novel taste solutions has a strong significance for an animal's survival. A lack of recognition of a taste's consequences could prevent ingestion of potential edibles or encounter death. We used conditioned taste aversion (CTA) and attenuation of neophobia (AN) to study aversive and safe taste memory formation. To determine if muscarinic receptors in the insular cortex participate differentially in both tasks, we infused the muscarinic antagonists scopolamine at distinct times before or after the presentation of a strong concentration of saccharin, followed by either an i.p. injection of a malaise-inducing agent or no injection. Our results showed that blockade of muscarinic receptors before taste presentation disrupts both learning tasks. However, the same treatment after the taste prevents AN but not CTA. These results clearly demonstrate that cortical cholinergic activity participates in the acquisition of both safe and aversive memory formation, and that cortical muscarinic receptors seem to be necessary for safe but not for aversive taste memory consolidation. These results suggest that the taste memory trace is processed in the insular cortex simultaneously by at least two independent mechanisms, and that their interaction would determine the degree of aversion or preference learned to a novel taste.

Blockade of cortical muscarinic but not NMDA receptors prevents a novel taste from becoming familiar

Exposure to a novel taste solution in the rat is followed by a decrease in its intake known as neophobia. This effect gradually disappears, and consumption increases from the second presentation of the taste (attenuation of neophobia), reflecting that the animal learned that it is safe to drink it. Conversely, if gastric malaise is induced after first intake, the rat will develop a long-lasting aversion (conditioned taste aversion). Previous attempts to elucidate the physiological nature of taste memory trace stems only from procedures that require malaise to measure taste memory. Here we assess the relevance of both muscarinic and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors, known to be involved in conditioned taste aversion, on taste memory using a nonaversive procedure (attenuation of neophobia learning). Attenuation of neophobia was impaired by the muscarinic receptor antagonist, scopolamine, microinjected 20 min before, immediately after or up to 2 h after the first taste experience, suggesting that muscarinic receptors are involved in the acquisition and consolidation of attenuation of neophobia learning. However, the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, d,l-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid, did not affect attenuation of neophobia even when the same dose of the drug was able to disrupt conditioned taste aversion learning, which suggests that attenuation of neophobia learning would be independent of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors activity in the insular cortex. The neophobic response induced by strong saccharin presentation was not affected by either of the treatments given, which rules out any impairment in taste perception. These results indicate that while cortical muscarinic receptors are important in the formation and consolidation of safe memory trace, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor activity appears to be noncritical.

Long-term memory for contextual attributes: dissociation of amygdala and hippocampus

Rats were given passive avoidance training within a distinctive environment followed by subseizure level stimulation of the hippocampus or amygdala. The animals were then tested for retention of the aversive experience using a partial cue (subset of the original training environment) and a complete cue (the original training environment). Post-trial hippocampus stimulation produced a retention deficit in both the partial and complete cueing conditions, while post-trial amygdala stimulation produced an intermediate retention deficit in the partial, but no deficit in the complete cueing condition. It is proposed that the hippocampus, but not the amygdala, is involved in processing of the environmental context utilizing spatial temporal attributes.

Reticular stimulation facilitates retrieval of a 'forgotten' maze habit

Rats tested 25 days after training in a complex maze showed significant forgetting. Stimulation of the mesencephalic reticular formation immediately prior to retention testing facilitated performance in that stimulated rats made fewer errors (but did not run faster) than non-stimulated controls. Rats exposed to a contextual cue as a reminder before testing ran faster and made fewer errors than controls. Results are discussed in terms of forgetting being due to retrieval failure, and the reticular stimulation facilitating retrieval of information concerning the spatial configuration of the maze.

Electrical stimulation of the amygdala as a conditioned stimulus in a bait-shyness paradigm

Animals receiving low-intensity electrical stimulation of the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala while drinking plain tap water were injected with toxic doses of lithium chloride to examine whether brain stimulation can serve as a conditioned stimulus in a bait-shyness paradigm. Subjects receiving this pairing greatly reduced their water intake in a retention test, in a similar manner to a group in which saccharin was paired with poisoning. Pairing lithium chloride with stimulation of the amygdala had no effect on subsequent water intake in the absence of brain stimulation. This effect appears to be locus specific, as caudate stimulation could not serve as a conditioned stimulus.