Ventilatory compensation for changes in posture after human heart-lung transplantation

Diaphragm and Lung Transplantation

Mutual interactions between the diaphragm and lung transplantation (LTx) are known to exist. Before LTx, many factors can exert notable impact on the diaphragmatic function, such as the underlying respiratory disease, the comorbidities, and the chronic treatments of the patient. In the post-LTx setting, even the surgical procedure itself can cause a stressful trauma to the diaphragm, potentially leading to morphological and functional alterations. Conversely, the diaphragm can significantly influence various aspects of the LTx process, ranging from graft-to-chest cavity size matching to the long-term postoperative respiratory performance of the recipient. Despite this, there are still no standard criteria for evaluating, defining, and managing diaphragmatic dysfunction in the context of LTx to date. This deficiency hampers the accurate assessment of those factors which affect the diaphragm and its reciprocal influence on LTx outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to delve into the complex role the diaphragm plays in the different stages of LTx and into the modifications of this muscle following surgery.

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery

Since the publication of the last edition of the Handbook of Physiology, lung transplantation has become widely available, via specialized centers, for a variety of end-stage lung diseases. Lung volume reduction surgery, a procedure for emphysema first conceptualized in the 1950s, electrified the pulmonary medicine community when it was rediscovered in the 1990s. In parallel with their technical and clinical refinement, extensive investigation has explored the unique physiology of these procedures. In the case of lung transplantation, relevant issues include the discrepant mechanical function of the donor lungs and recipient thorax, the effects of surgical denervation, acute and chronic rejection, respiratory, chest wall, and limb muscle function, and response to exercise. For lung volume reduction surgery, there have been new insights into the counterintuitive observation that lung function in severe emphysema can be improved by resecting the most diseased portions of the lungs. For both procedures, insights from physiology have fed back to clinicians to refine patient selection and to scientists to design clinical trials. This section will first provide an overview of the clinical aspects of these procedures, including patient selection, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes. It then reviews the extensive data on lung and muscle function following transplantation and its complications. Finally, it reviews the insights from the last 15 years on the mechanisms whereby removal of lung from an emphysema patient can improve the function of the lung left behind.

Detection of inspiratory resistive loads in double-lung transplant recipients

The afferent pathways mediating respiratory load perception are still largely unknown. To assess the role of lung vagal afferents in respiratory sensation, detection of inspiratory resistive loads was compared between 10 double-lung transplant (DLT) recipients with normal lung function and 12 healthy control (Nor) subjects. Despite a similar unloaded and loaded breathing pattern, the DLT group had a significantly higher detection threshold (2.91 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.55 +/- 0.3 cmH(2)O. l(-1). s) and Weber fraction (0.50 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.1) compared with the Nor group. These results suggest that inspiratory resistive load detection occurs in the absence of vagal afferent feedback from the lung but that lung vagal afferents contribute to inspiratory resistive load detection response in humans. Lung vagal afferents are not essential to the regulation of resting breathing and load compensation responses.

Orthostatic intolerance and motion sickness after parabolic flight

Because it is not clear that the induction of orthostatic intolerance in returning astronauts always requires prolonged exposure to microgravity, we investigated orthostatic tolerance and autonomic cardiovascular function in 16 healthy subjects before and after the brief micro- and hypergravity of parabolic flight. Concomitantly, we investigated the effect of parabolic flight-induced vomiting on orthostatic tolerance, R-wave-R-wave interval and arterial pressure power spectra, and carotid-cardiac baroreflex and Valsalva responses. After parabolic flight 1) 8 of 16 subjects could not tolerate 30 min of upright tilt (compared to 2 of 16 before flight); 2) 6 of 16 subjects vomited; 3) new intolerance to upright tilt was associated with exaggerated falls in total peripheral resistance, whereas vomiting was associated with increased R-wave-R-wave interval variability and carotid-cardiac baroreflex responsiveness; and 4) the proximate mode of new orthostatic failure differed in subjects who did and did not vomit, with vomiters experiencing comparatively isolated upright hypocapnia and cerebral vasoconstriction and nonvomiters experiencing signs and symptoms reminiscent of the clinical postural tachycardia syndrome. Results suggest, first, that syndromes of orthostatic intolerance resembling those developing after space flight can develop after a brief (i.e., 2-h) parabolic flight and, second, that recent vomiting can influence the results of tests of autonomic cardiovascular function commonly utilized in returning astronauts.

Postural breathing pattern changes in patients with myotonic dystrophy

We recorded by pneumotachography the breathing in nine patients with myotonic dystrophy (MD), both seated and supine and with eyes open in both positions. Irregular breathing (coefficient of variation >20% for VT and TTOT) was observed in six of the patients, two of whom showed irregularity in both positions whilst the remaining four had irregular breathing only when supine. In addition, in this latter group, irregularities first appeared in VT and only after a few minutes in TTOT. Whereas in the group exhibiting irregular breathing in both seated and supine positions, irregularities were observed throughout the recording. However, no significant difference in any ventilatory variable was observed as between the two postures. Rib cage (RC) and abdomen (AB) motions were recorded by uncalibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography. Although for MD patients the mean values of the RC/AB ratio lay within the normal range the relative decrease in value as between seated (0.78+/-0.52) and supine (0.31+/-0.13) position was less than in healthy subjects. These observations suggest that MD may cause deficiencies in several mechanisms. Analyses of the respiratory pattern in each patient may provide information leading to the identification of the impaired respiratory mechanisms.

Chest wall mechanics in sustained microgravity

We assessed the effects of sustained weightlessness on chest wall mechanics in five astronauts who were studied before, during, and after the 10-day Spacelab D-2 mission (n = 3) and the 180-day Euromir-95 mission (n = 2). We measured flow and pressure at the mouth and rib cage and abdominal volumes during resting breathing and during a relaxation maneuver from midinspiratory capacity to functional residual capacity. Microgravity produced marked and consistent changes (Delta) in the contribution of the abdomen to tidal volume [DeltaVab/(DeltaVab + DeltaVrc), where Vab is abdominal volume and Vrc is rib cage volume], which increased from 30.7 +/- 3. 5 (SE)% at 1 G head-to-foot acceleration to 58.3 +/- 5.7% at 0 G head-to-foot acceleration (P < 0.005). Values of DeltaVab/(DeltaVab + DeltaVrc) did not change significantly during the 180 days of the Euromir mission, but in the two subjects DeltaVab/(DeltaVab + DeltaVrc) was greater on postflight day 1 than on subsequent postflight days or preflight. In the two subjects who produced satisfactory relaxation maneuvers, the slope of the Konno-Mead plot decreased in microgravity; this decrease was entirely accounted for by an increase in abdominal compliance because rib cage compliance did not change. These alterations are similar to those previously reported during short periods of weightlessness inside aircrafts flying parabolic trajectories. They are also qualitatively similar to those observed on going from upright to supine posture; however, in contrast to microgravity, such postural change reduces rib cage compliance.

Gravity effects on upper airway area and lung volumes during parabolic flight

We measured upper airway caliber and lung volumes in six normal subjects in the sitting and supine positions during 20-s periods in normogravity, hypergravity [1.8 + head-to-foot acceleration (Gz)], and microgravity ( approximately 0 Gz) induced by parabolic flights. Airway caliber and lung volumes were inferred by the acoustic reflection method and inductance plethysmography, respectively. In subjects in the sitting position, an increase in gravity from 0 to 1. 8 +Gz was associated with increases in the calibers of the retrobasitongue and palatopharyngeal regions (+20 and +30%, respectively) and with a concomitant 0.5-liter increase in end-expiratory lung volume (functional residual capacity, FRC). In subjects in the supine position, no changes in the areas of these regions were observed, despite significant decreases in FRC from microgravity to normogravity (-0.6 liter) and from microgravity to hypergravity (-0.5 liter). Laryngeal narrowing also occurred in both positions (about -15%) when gravity increased from 0 to 1.8 +Gz. We concluded that variation in lung volume is insufficient to explain all upper airway caliber variation but that direct gravity effects on tissues surrounding the upper airway should be taken into account.

[Ventilatory control in lung transplantation]

Heart/lung transplantation offers a unique opportunity for studying the role of pulmonary innervation on control of breathing. In heart/lung transplant patients the pattern of breathing has been found to remain unaffected at rest and when asleep. In contrast, CO2 breathing studies have yield conflicting results. In heart/lung transplant recipients with normal pulmonary function, the hypercapnic ventilatory response was not different from that seen in control subjects, whereas heart/lung transplant recipients with moderate restriction had a profound depression in the ventilatory response to CO2. These results suggested that pulmonary vagal afferent fibers may have a facilitating effect on the hypercapnic ventilatory response in patients with restriction. This result is in opposition with data from airway anesthesia studies. In studies of the effects of exercise in transplant patients, control of breathing was affected in the same way as in normal subjects with anesthetized airways: transplant patients had an appropriate level of ventilation with a disproportionate increase in tidal volume. In normal subjects after suppression of inspiratory activity by mechanical hyperventilation, hypercapnia at which inspiratory activity muscle recruitment appeared was lower when arterial CO2 was raised by decreasing ventilator ventilation rather than by adding CO2 in the inspiratory line. This was not the case in double lung transplant subjects. These findings suggest that pulmonary afferent nerves have an inhibitory effect on inspiratory activity in humans. In conclusion, pulmonary afferent play a negligible role in the control of breathing of human at rest but are important in regulating the pattern of ventilation during stress conditions and large tidal volume conditions.

Effect of head-up tilt on neural inspiratory drive in the anesthetized dog

To examine how anesthetized dogs compensate for the diaphragmatic shortening that occurs during head-up tilting, we measured the electroneurogram (ENG) of the C5 phrenic root and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the parasternal intercostal and transversus abdominis muscles in eight spontaneously breathing animals during postural changes between supine (0 degree) and 80 degrees head-up. Both steady state ENG and EMG activities and first breath responses to tilting from 80 degrees head-up to supine were studied. These experiments have shown that: (1) anesthetized dogs respond to head-up tilting by increasing the neural drive to the costal diaphragm and parasternal intercostals; (2) this response, however, does not occur on the first breath and therefore cannot compensate for the immediate changes in diaphragmatic length; (3) the abdominal muscles, in contrast, show a first breath response to tilting and their activation is primarily responsible for the maintenance of tidal volume. Unlike in humans, increases in neural inspiratory drive in head-up anesthetized dogs are mediated by a chemoreceptive, rather than proprioceptive, feedback mechanism.