Treatment of kala-azar in Brazil with Amphocil (amphotericin B cholesterol dispersion) for 5 days

A novel outlook in the delivery of artemisinin: production and efficacy in experimental visceral leishmaniasis

The visceral form of leishmaniasis (VL), due to infection by Leishmania infantum, is a neglected tropical disease. The accessible therapeutic options are limited. Artemisinin is an efficient antileishmanial product with poor biological availability that requires high repetition of therapeutic doses in VL. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) provide targeted delivery, increase bioavailability and reduce toxicity of the traditional therapeutic strategy. The spherical shape artemisinin-loaded SLNs were prepared in a particle diameter of 222.0 ± 14.0 nm. The SLNs showed no particular toxic effect on the parasites, whereas the native artemisinin demonstrated a significant toxicity rate of 31% in viability of the promastigotes at the 250 µg/ml concentration. The therapeutic efficacy of the artemisinin-loaded SLNs was demonstrated in the experimental VL, using the L. infantum-infected BALB/c mice, in the present study. The 10 and 20 mg/kg doses of artemisinin-loaded SLNs showed higher level of antileishmanial efficacy compared with the free artemisinin. There was a significant diminishing of the parasite burden in liver (84.7 ± 4.9%) and spleen (85.0 ± 3.1%) and hepatosplenomegaly by the artemisinin-loaded SLNs treated at 20 mg/kg compared to the free artemisinin. Therefore, the present study supports the superior efficacy of artemisinin-loaded SLNs over the free artemisinin and could be considered as a new therapeutic strategy in the treatment of leishmaniasis.

Can We Harness Immune Responses to Improve Drug Treatment in Leishmaniasis?

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne parasitic disease that has been neglected in priority for control and eradication of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS. Collectively, over one seventh of the world’s population is at risk of being infected with 0.7–1.2 million new infections reported annually. Clinical manifestations range from self-healing cutaneous lesions to fatal visceral disease. The first anti-leishmanial drugs were introduced in the 1950′s and, despite several shortcomings, remain the mainstay for treatment. Regardless of this and the steady increase in infections over the years, particularly among populations of low economic status, research on leishmaniasis remains under funded. This review looks at the drugs currently in clinical use and how they interact with the host immune response. Employing chemoimmunotherapeutic approaches may be one viable alternative to improve the efficacy of novel/existing drugs and extend their lifespan in clinical use.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH)

It is important to realize that leishmaniasis guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. The IDSA and ASTMH consider adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determinations regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.

Species-directed therapy for leishmaniasis in returning travellers: a comprehensive guide

Background

Leishmaniasis is increasingly reported among travellers. Leishmania species vary in sensitivity to available therapies. Fast and reliable molecular techniques have made species-directed treatment feasible. Many treatment trials have been designed poorly, thus developing evidence-based guidelines for species-directed treatment is difficult. Published guidelines on leishmaniasis in travellers do not aim to be comprehensive or do not quantify overall treatment success for available therapies. We aimed at providing comprehensive species-directed treatment guidelines.

Methodology/Principal Findings

English literature was searched using PubMed. Trials and observational studies were included if all cases were parasitologically confirmed, the Leishmania species was known, clear clinical end-points and time points for evaluation of treatment success were defined, duration of follow-up was adequate and loss to follow-up was acceptable. The proportion of successful treatment responses was pooled using mixed effects methods to estimate the efficacy of specific therapies. Final ranking of treatment options was done by an expert panel based on pooled efficacy estimates and practical considerations. 168 studies were included, with 287 treatment arms. Based on Leishmania species, symptoms and geography, 25 clinical categories were defined and therapy options ranked. In 12/25 categories, proposed treatment agreed with highest efficacy data from literature. For 5/25 categories no literature was found, and in 8/25 categories treatment advise differed from literature evidence. For uncomplicated cutaneous leishmaniasis, combination of intralesional antimony with cryotherapy is advised, except for L. guyanensis and L. braziliensis infections, for which systemic treatment is preferred. Treatment of complicated (muco)cutaneous leishmaniasis differs per species. For visceral leishmaniasis, liposomal amphotericin B is treatment of choice.

Conclusions/Significance

Our study highlights current knowledge about species-directed therapy of leishmaniasis in returning travellers and also demonstrates lack of evidence for treatment of several clinical categories. New data can easily be incorporated in the presented overview. Updates will be of use for clinical decision making and for defining further research.

Human leishmaniasis is caused by unicellular parasites that are injected into the skin by sand-flies, small, flying insects. Many different Leishmania species cause various manifestations of disease, both of the skin and internal organs. Leishmaniasis is a curable disease but clear guidelines on the best available treatment are lacking. Leishmania species differ in sensitivity to available drugs. Until recently, identification of the infecting Leishmania parasite was laborious, thus therapy could not precisely be targeted to the infecting species, in contrast to many other infectious diseases. Nowadays, Leishmania parasites can be identified relatively easily with new DNA techniques. We studied efficacy of therapies for diseases due to different Leishmania species, limited to the English literature. Efficacy was summarized and presented in an easy to read format. Because of difficulties with identification of parasite species in earlier studies, quality of evidence was often limited. Our findings are a major help for clinicians to easily find optimal treatment for specific patients. Moreover, our results demonstrate where additional research is needed to further improve treatment of leishmaniasis.

Progress in the treatment of a neglected infectious disease: visceral leishmaniasis

Visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) is a disseminated intracellular protozoal infection. Most cases (90%) occur in the rural regions of five countries: India, Sudan, Nepal, Bangladesh and Brazil. As with other infectious diseases embedded in high-level poverty, developing and/or delivering new treatments for visceral leishmaniasis had been painfully slow or nonexistent. However, despite persistent unresolved obstacles (e.g., drug affordability), renewed interest in visceral leishmaniasis and numerous successful treatment trials have combined to turn a therapeutic corner in the past 5 years, yielding new alternatives to conventional pentavalent antimony. Advances include the use of low-cost generic pentavalent antimony, rediscovery of amphotericin B, short-course regimens via lipid formulations of amphotericin B, retesting injectible paromyomycin and, of clear-cut importance, identifying miltefosine (Impavido, Zentaris) as the first effective oral therapy for this neglected disease.

Evaluation of toxicity & therapeutic efficacy of a new liposomal formulation of amphotericin B in a mouse model

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Current therapy for leishmaniasis is limited and unsatisfactory. Amphotericin B, a second-line treatment is gradually replacing antimonials, the first-line treatment and is used as the preferred treatments in some regions. Though, presently it is the only drug with highest cure rate, its use is severely restricted by its acute toxicity. In the present study novel lipid-amphotericin B formulations with lower toxicity than the parent drug were evaluated for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in a mouse model.

METHODS

The toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of a new amphiphilic formulation of amphotericin B (Kalsome10) was compared to that of amphotericin B deoxycholate (Fungizone) in a mouse model of VL using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

RESULTS

The toxicity of amphotericin B was significantly less with liposomal formulation as compared to the deoxycholate form, evidenced by reduced nephrotoxicity and higher tolerated dose in BALB/c mice. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by quantitative real time (RT) PCR using primers highly specific for the ITS region of Leishmania donovani. There was reduction in parasite load by 2 log unit after 7 days of treatment and finally resulting in complete clearance of parasite from infected mice after 30 days of treatment with Kalsome10.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS

This new formulation showed a favourable safety profile and better efficacy when compared to conventional amphotericin B. If production cost is kept low, it may prove to be a feasible alternative to conventional amphotericin B.

Drug delivery strategies for therapy of visceral leishmaniasis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is the most overwhelming type of leishmaniasis associated with the poverty of developing countries and usually mortal if untreated. Most of the conventionally used dosage forms offer us the shortcomings of toxic side effects and emergence of drug resistance. Several efforts have been made to overcome the barriers involved in the treatment of VL. Colloidal carriers extensively represent the drug delivery systems (DDSs) for intracellular localization of antileishmanial compounds in macrophage-rich organs such as liver, spleen and bone marrow. These DDSs offer superior therapeutic efficacy over the conventional treatment in terms of site-specific drug delivery with reduced side effects. However, after 35 years of research in the field, AmBisome (Amphotericin B liposome for injection, Astellas Pharma US, Inc.) is the only DDS used against the VL.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

A literature search was performed (for drugs and DDSs against VL) on PubMed and through Google.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review aims to describe the pathophysiology of VL and its current conventional treatment with special reference to DDSs designed against VL.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

On reviewing the conventional drugs and DDSs developed against VL, it is concluded that advances in the field of targeted drug delivery can result in more efficient strategies for the therapy of VL.

Control of visceral leishmaniasis in latin america-a systematic review

BACKGROUND

While three countries in South Asia decided to eliminate anthroponotic visceral leishmaniasis (VL) by 2015, its control in other regions seems fraught with difficulties. Is there a scope for more effective VL control in the Americas where transmission is zoonotic? We reviewed the evidence on VL control strategies in Latin America-diagnosis, treatment, veterinary interventions, vector control-with respect to entomological and clinical outcomes.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE, LILACS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from 1960 to November 2008 and references of selected articles. Intervention trials as well as observational studies that evaluated control strategies of VL in the Americas were included. While the use of rapid diagnostic tests for VL diagnosis seems well established, there is a striking lack of evidence from clinical trials for drug therapy and few well designed intervention studies for control of vectors or canine reservoirs.

CONCLUSION

Elimination of zoonotic VL in the Americas does not seem a realistic goal at this point given the lack of political commitment, gaps in scientific knowledge, and the weakness of case management and surveillance systems. Research priorities and current strategies should be reviewed with the aim of achieving better VL control.

Drug resistance in Leishmania: similarities and differences to other organisms

The main line of defense available against parasitic protozoa is chemotherapy. Drug resistance has emerged however, as a primary obstacle to the successful treatment and control of parasitic diseases. Leishmania spp., the causative agents of leishmaniasis, have served as a useful model for studying mechanisms of drug resistance in vitro. Antimonials and amphotericin B are the first line drugs to treat Leishmania followed by pentamidine and a number of other drugs. Parasites resistant against all these classes of drugs have been selected under laboratory conditions. A multiplicity of resistance mechanisms has been detected, the most prevalent being gene amplification and transport mutations. With the tools now available, it should be possible to elucidate the mechanisms that govern drug resistance in field isolates and develop more effective chemotherapeutic agents.

Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion for the Treatment of Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis

BACKGROUND

In Bihar, India, where visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is hyperendemic and refractory to antimony, amphotericin B is the most effective option for the treatment of VL. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B are able to circumvent the toxic effect of conventional amphotericin B, and the total dose of these formulations can be administered over a short duration. However, cost is a major constraint in the use of lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD), which is a less expensive lipid formulation, has not been tested for the treatment of VL in India.

METHODS

In an open-label, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 6-day course of ABCD administered to 3 different dose groups (total dose: 7.5 mg/kg [group A], 10 mg/kg [group B], and 15 mg/kg [group C]), each of which included a cohort of 135 patients.

RESULTS

Although infusion-related fever and chills occurred in 56%-68% of patients in the 3 different dose groups, 401 of 405 patients completed the treatment. All 135 patients in group A completed treatment, and the final cure rate for this group was 97%. In the group that received the highest dose of ABCD (group C), severe backache, an unusual side effect, was observed in 8 patients (5.92%). Serious adverse effects led to the withdrawal of 2 patients (1.48%) each from group B and group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the cost of ABCD is prohibitive, the high level of efficacy associated with short-term treatment with low-dose ABCD provides another alternative for the treatment of VL, especially in regions where VL is antimony refractory.

[Visceral leishmaniasis: new drugs]

The standard treatment of visceral leishmaniasis is pentavalent antimony (meglumine antimoniate or sodium stibogluconate), but toxicity is frequent with this drug. Moreover, antimony unresponsiveness is increasing, both in immunocompetent and in immunosuppressed patients. Amphotericin B is a polyene macrolide antibiotic that binds to sterols in cell membranes. It is the most active antileishmanial agent in use. Its infusion-related and renal toxicity may be reduced by lipid-based delivery. Liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome) seems to be less toxic than other amphotericin B lipid formulations (Amphocil, Amphotec). Optimal drug regimens of Ambisome vary from one geographical area to another. In the Mediterranean Basin, a total dose of 18 to 24 mg/kg is safe and effective. Shortening the duration of treatment without decreasing the total dose (i.e., 10 mg/kg/day for 2 days) seems promising to reduce the global cost of the therapy.

Amphotericin B Treatment for Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis: Conventional versus Lipid Formulations

In Bihar, India, where visceral leishmaniasis is hyperendemic, amphotericin B deoxycholate is now first-line parenteral treatment. To test the efficacy of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus that of its lipid formulations, Indian patients were randomized to receive treatment with amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg on alternate days for 30 days; n=51), liposomal amphotericin B (2 mg/kg per day for 5 days; n=51), or amphotericin B lipid complex (2 mg/kg per day for 5 days; n=51). Infusion-associated reactions were frequent and persistent in subjects treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate. The illness of 3 patients failed to respond to treatment, and 5 patients experienced relapse. Final cure rates were similar. Estimated total treatment costs for a 25-kg patient-417 dollars for amphotericin B deoxycholate, 872 dollars for liposomal amphotericin B, and 947 dollars for amphotericin B lipid complex-differed as a result of drug cost. Substantial reductions (approximately 60%) in the price of liposomal amphotericin B and amphotericin B lipid complex would make treatment costs comparable to that of amphotericin B deoxycholate, permitting administration of short-course regimens in India.

Liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in immunocompetent patients

The leishmaniases are protozoan diseases caused by Leishmania parasites. The first-line treatment of its visceral forms is pentavalent antimony (meglumine antimoniate or sodium stibogluconate), but toxicity is frequent with this drug. Moreover antimony unresponsiveness is increasing in Leishmania infantum and L. donovani foci, both in immunocompetent and in immunosuppressed patients. Amphotericin B is a polyene macrolide antibiotic that binds to sterols in cell membranes. It is the most active antileishmanial agent in use. Its infusion-related and renal toxicity may be reduced by lipid-based delivery. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome); Gilead Science, Paris, France) seems to be less toxic than other amphotericin B lipid formulations (Amphocil); Liposome Technology Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA, Amphotec); Ben Venue Laboratories Inc., Bedford, OH, USA). Optimal drug regimens of AmBisome) vary from one geographical area to another. In the Mediterranean Basin, a total dose of 18 mg/kg (3 mg/kg on days 1-5 and 3 mg/kg on day 10) could be used as first-line treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in immunocompetent patients. In immunocompromised patients, especially those co-infected with HIV, relapses are frequent with AmBisome), as with other drugs.

Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: a review of current treatment practices

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a systemic protozoan infection that infects a million people living in subtropical and tropical areas. Once established, the clinical course of untreated disease leads to death. Recent, large-scale epidemics in east Africa and India and the emergence of a new epidemic in patients infected with HIV makes VL a priority for the World Health Organization. Pentavalent antimonials have been the mainstay of the treatment for > 60years. The progressive appearance of antimonial resistance, the developments of lipid formulations of amphotericin B and a new oral administered drug (miltefosine) have changed the pattern of VL treatment. The prohibitive cost of new therapies leads to different treatment practices according to the socioeconomic and cultural status of each region.

Efficacy of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion in the treatment of Mediterranean visceral leishmaniasis in immunocompetent adult patients

Twelve immunocompetent adults with Mediterranean visceral leishmaniasis (VL) were treated with amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD; 2 mg/kg/d for 7 d). All patients showed rapid clinical response without significant adverse events. Two weeks after therapy they were parasitologically cured and no relapses occurred during 6 months. ABCD is a valid alternative in the management of Mediterranean VL in adult patients.

Treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis with single or daily infusions of low dose liposomal amphotericin B: randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To test short course, low dose liposomal amphotericin B as single or daily infusion treatment in Indian visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar).

DESIGN

Randomised, open label study.

SETTING

Inpatient unit for leishmaniasis in Bihar, India.

PARTICIPANTS

91 adults and children with splenic aspirate positive for infection.

INTERVENTIONS

Total dose of 5 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B given as a single infusion (n=46) or as once daily infusions of 1 mg/kg for five days (n=45).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical and parasitological cure assessed 14 days after treatment and long term definitive cure (healthy, no relapse) at six months.

RESULTS

All but one person in each group had an initial apparent cure. During six months of follow up, three patients in the single dose group and two in the five dose group relapsed. Complete response (definitive cure) was therefore achieved in 84 of 91 subjects (92%): 42 of 46 patients in the single dose group (91%, 95% confidence interval 79% to 98%) and 42 of 45 in the five dose group (93%, 82% to 99%). Response rates in the two groups were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Low dose liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg), given either as a five day course or as a single infusion, seems to be effective for visceral leishmaniasis and warrants further testing.

Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar): a decade of progress and future approaches

In 1990, there was essentially one treatment regimen in use for visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) around the world: 20 to 28 days of daily injections of pentavalent antimony (Sb). During the past 10 years, however, new agents have been tested alone or in combination, in more than 50 studies carried out worldwide. This renewed clinical effort was spurred by a variety of factors, including the emergence of large-scale Sb unresponsiveness in India, where up to one-half of the world's cases of kala-azar now are found. As this new decade opens, the success of this clinical research effort is tangible: three additional, highly effective parenteral regimens now are available (amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, aminosidine), and an active oral agent, a long sought after objective in kala-azar, has been identified (miltefosine). This report reviews the evolution of treatment of visceral leishmaniasis, considers the interaction of the immune response and chemotherapy, highlights therapeutic successes and failures, examines advantages and disadvantages of current treatments, and looks at future therapeutic approaches to the management of this disseminated intracellular protozoal infection.

Short-course, cost-effective treatment with amphotericin B-fat emulsion cures visceral leishmaniasis

Although short-course therapy with new lipid formulations of amphotericin B represents an advance over lengthy traditional treatments in visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar), high cost has rendered these agents largely irrelevant in developing countries where the disease is endemic. Therefore, we tested standard amphotericin B deoxycholate mixed with a commercial fat emulsion as short-course treatment for Indian visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar in 1997/98. Seventy children and adults with splenic aspirate-documented infection, 23 of whom had failed prior antimony (Sb) therapy, received 5 alternate-day infusions of 2 mg/kg. Apparent cure, which required a parasite-free splenic aspirate smear, was assessed 20 days after treatment (day 30); definitive cure was determined at 6 months. Other than anticipated infusion-related fever and/or chills, treatment was safe and well tolerated. One patient required dose modification because of mild, reversible renal insufficiency. Sixty-nine patients (98.6%, CI 92.3-100%) had apparent cures; during follow-up, there were 4 treatment failures (relapses, 3; unrelated death, 1), yielding definitive cures in 65 of 70 patients (92.9%, CI 84.1-97.6%). Including retreatment costs for patients in Bihar (who now often fail initial Sb therapy), the final per patient cost of the tested regimen (US $260) was 59% and 43% less than treatment with Sb or conventional amphotericin B alone, respectively. Short-course treatment with amphotericin B-fat emulsion is active, cost-effective treatment for patients with visceral leishmaniasis including those with Sb-unresponsive infection.

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal dispersion of a stable complex of amphotericin B with cholesteryl sulphate in a 1:1 proportion, forming uniform disk-shaped particles. ABCD is associated with less nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related adverse events are more frequent in patients receiving ABCD than in patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B deoxycholate. ABCD has been shown in a randomised, double-blind study, to be an effective alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia. ABCD is active in the treatment of invasive Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. infections in immunocompromised hosts, however most of the data supporting its use for these types of infections is derived from non-comparative open-label clinical trials of patient refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. ABCD is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients where renal impairment of unacceptable toxicity precludes the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate in effective doses, and in patients with invasive aspergillosis where prior amphotericin B deoxycholate therapy has failed. Two other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B, are available and, like ABCD, are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity as compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. The role of ABCD in comparison with these other lipid formulations of amphotericin B is discussed herein. High cost remains an issue with all lipid formulations of amphotericin B.

The United States military and leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis occurs not only in American travelers and military personnel alike but infects a significant portion of the world's population. The US military has made major contributions to the understanding of the complicated epidemiology of this parasite, the development of rapid reliable diagnostic tests, and to the development of safe, more efficient, and more effective treatment of leishmaniasis.

[Treatment of infantile visceral leishmaniasis]

Visceral leishmaniasis is an endemic disease in the Mediterranean Basin. Children are one of the targets of the infection. Treatment usually requires parenteral injections of pentavalent antimony (Glucantime or Pentostam), but the high frequency of adverse events and the occurrence of primary or secondary resistance cases limit the use of these medications. Diamidines (Pentacarinat) or amphotericin B derivatives are alternatives to antimony. Unfortunately, pharmacokinetics and optimal dosage of diamidines are not well-known, and numerous adverse events are described. Liposomal preparations of amphotericin B enhance its efficiency and tolerance, and the duration of treatment may be reduced to 5 days. Moreover, primary resistance to amphotericin B is not described in immunocompetent children. Allopurinol associated with antimony seems no more efficient than antimony alone. Aminosidine is not evaluated.

Short- and long-term efficacy of hexadecylphosphocholine against established Leishmania infantum infection in BALB/c mice

In the immunocompetent host, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a fatal disease if untreated. In immunosuppressed patients, VL is an opportunistic infection for which there is no effective treatment for relapses. Here we report on the long-term activity of orally administered hexadecylphosphocholine (HDPC) against established Leishmania infantum infection in BALB/c mice. HDPC is a synthetic phospholipid with antiproliferative properties that has been extensively studied for its cancerostatic activity. Its short-term leishmanicidal effects in mice recently infected with viscerotropic Leishmania species have been previously reported. First, we show that 5 days of oral therapy with HDPC (20 mg/kg of body weight/day) led to amastigote suppression in the liver and the spleen of 94 and 78%, respectively (versus 85 and 55% suppression by meglumine antimonate in the liver and spleen, respectively), in mice infected 6 weeks before treatment and examined 3 days after the end of treatment. These results demonstrate the short-term efficacy of HDPC against an established Leishmania infection. Next, the long-term efficacy of HDPC was examined. In HDPC-treated mice both the hepatic and splenic amastigote loads were significantly reduced (at least 89%) 10, 31, and 52 days after the end of the treatment. In the treated mice, the increase of the splenic load was significantly slower than that in the untreated mice, demonstrating that the HDPC-exerted inhibition of Leishmania growth persisted for at least 7 to 8 weeks. Orally administered HDPC--the safe doses and side effects of which are at least partially known--appears to be a promising candidate for the treatment of VL.

Comparison of the efficacies of various formulations of amphotericin B against murine visceral leishmaniasis

The antileishmanial efficacies of four proprietary amphotericin B (AmB) formulations (Fungizone, AmBisome, Abelcet, and Amphocil) and an experimental nonionic surfactant vesicle (NIV) formulation were compared in a murine model of acute visceral leishmaniasis. By a multiple-dosing regimen, groups of Leishmania donovani-infected BALB/c mice were treated (2.5 mg of AmB per kg of body weight) on days 7 to 11 postinfection with one of the AmB formulations, and parasite burdens were determined on day 18 postinfection. All of the formulations caused significant suppression parasite burdens in spleens (P < 0.01 to 0.0005) and livers (P < 0.0005) compared with those in the spleens and livers of the controls. In addition, a significant suppression of parasite burdens in bone marrow (P < 0.0005) compared to the burdens in the bone marrow of the controls was obtained for all the formulations except Abelcet, which was inactive at this site. On the basis of their overall efficacies (activity against liver, spleen, and bone marrow parasites), the formulations could be ranked as follows: Amphocil = AmBisome > AmB-NIV > Abelcet >> Fungizone. On the basis of spectrophotometric measurements, AmB was shown to exist in a predominantly aggregated state in all of the formulations. Although incubation in 50% serum altered the degree of aggregation, the AmB remained predominantly aggregated, indicating that the AMB-lipid complex in all of the formulations was physically stable. The results of the study showed that antiparasitic efficacy is associated positively with the degree of AmB aggregation in the presence of serum.

Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in children with liposomal amphotericin B

We used liposomal amphotericin B as first-choice treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in 106 immunocompetent children who acquired the infection in a temperate region of southern Europe (Italy) where Leishmania infantum visceral leishmaniasis is endemic. The aim of the study was to identify the minimum total dose of liposomal amphotericin B needed to cure the infection in children and reduce the period of hospitalization. We conclude that the optimal regimen in immunocompetent children with L. infantum visceral leishmaniasis to be a total dose of 18 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg per day for 5 days, followed by 3 mg/kg administered as an outpatient regimen on day 10).

Sequential treatment of deep fungal infections with amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a novel lipid formulation of amphotericin B designed to diminish toxic effects of the drug. In the following report, nine cases of suspected (n = 4) and proven (n = 5) deep Candida infection, treated sequentially with amphotericin B deoxycholate and ABCD, are presented. The treatment was successful in seven cases. During treatment with amphotericin B deoxycholate, a rise in serum creatinine was observed in seven patients, hypokalemia in five, and metabolic acidosis in four. After replacing amphotericin B deoxycholate with ABCD, laboratory parameters improved in four of the seven patients with increased creatinine, in four of the five patients with hypokalemia, and in two of the four patients with metabolic acidosis. Infusion-related rigors were observed in four patients receiving amphotericin B deoxycholate and in one patient treated with ABCD. Reversible elevation of liver enzymes was found in one patient receiving ABCD. In this study ABCD proved less toxic than amphotericin B deoxycholate. The efficacy of ABCD alone cannot be assessed because of previous treatment with amphotericin B deoxycholate, but sequential treatment of deep Candida infections with amphotericin B deoxycholate and ABCD seems to be an effective therapeutic modality, especially in patients requiring prolonged administration of amphotericin B.

Activity of liposomal amphotericin B against experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis

The polyene antibiotic amphotericin B is currently a second-line treatment for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Lipid-amphotericin B formulations with lower toxicity than the parent drug that were developed for the treatment of systemic mycoses have proved to be an effective treatment for VL, especially AmBisome, a small unilamellar negatively charged liposome. In vitro, free amphotericin B was three to six times more active than the liposomal formulation AmBisome against both Leishmania major promastigotes in culture and amastigotes in murine macrophages. In a BALB/c L. major model of cutaneous infection, liposomal amphotericin B administered once a day on six alternate days by the intravenous route produced a dose-response effect between 6.25 and 50 mg/kg. Liposomal amphotericin B administered subcutaneously close to a lesion had no significant activity. Free drug was ineffective at nontoxic doses. The results suggest that liposomal amphotericin B may be useful in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Therapy of visceral leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum: experimental assessment of efficacy of AmBisome

The tolerance and efficacy of amphotericin B (AmB) deoxycholate (Fungizone) were compared with those of liposomal AmB (AmBisome) in a murine model of visceral leishmaniasis induced by Leishmania infantum. Control groups consisted of untreated mice and mice treated with a pentavalent antimonial (Glucantime). BALB/c mice were infected intravenously on day 0 with 10(7) promastigotes of L. infantum and then treated from day 7 to 17 (early treatment group) or from day 60 to 70 (delayed treatment group). The pentavalent antimonial was administered daily by intraperitoneal injection, whereas AmB formulations were administered intravenously on alternate days. On days 20, 60, and 120 (early treatment group) and on days 72 and 125 (delayed treatment group), parasite burdens in the liver, spleen, and lungs were determined by subculturings using a microtitration method. A dose range study showed that administration of AmBisome at the well-tolerated doses of 5 or 50 mg/kg of body weight completely eradicated the parasites from the tissues. At 0.8 mg/kg, AmBisome proved more efficacious than AmB deoxycholate administered at the same dose. We also compared the levels of AmB deoxycholate and AmBisome in plasma and tissue. Mice treated with AmBisome had levels of AmB in tissue much higher than did AmB deoxycholate-treated mice with persistent detectable levels 14 weeks after treatment. These results seem to account for the remarkable efficacy of the liposomal formulation of AmB in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis due to L. infantum.

New developments in the chemotherapy of leishmaniasis

Several significant advances in the chemotherapy of leishmaniasis have occurred in the last 10 years. Some of these advances have arisen due to the greater awareness of the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs, such as the pentavalent antimonials, while others have resulted from the introduction of drugs new to the treatment of leishmaniasis, such as aminosidine which can be used both systemically and topically against cutaneous leishmaniasis. The most encouraging advance is the use of lipid-associated amphotericin B; very short treatments with these preparations have been shown to be effective. Other studies have shown the usefulness of combination therapy and the use of immune modulators. A number of biochemical pathways in Leishmania, such as those associated with purine and sterol metabolism, are known to be distinct from those of the mammalian hosts. These have been exploited in the search for the rational choice of anti-leishmanial agents.