Diagnostic considerations in molar gestations

Placental Pathology Findings in Unexplained Pregnancy Losses

There are approximately 5 million pregnancies per year in the USA, with 1 million ending in miscarriage (a loss occurring prior to 20 weeks of gestation) and over 20,000 ending in stillbirth at or beyond 20 weeks of gestation. As many as 50% of these losses are unexplained. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of expanding the placental pathology diagnostic categories to include the explicit categories of (1) dysmorphic chorionic villi and (2) small placenta in examining previously unexplained losses. Using a clinical database of 1256 previously unexplained losses at 6-43 weeks of gestation, the most prevalent abnormality associated with each loss was determined through examination of its placental pathology slides. Of 1256 cases analyzed from 922 patients, there were 878 (69.9%) miscarriages and 378 (30.1%) antepartum stillbirths. We determined the pathologic diagnoses for 1150/1256 (91.6%) of the entire series, 777/878 (88.5%) of the miscarriages (< 20 weeks' gestation), and 373/378 (98.7%) of the stillbirths (≥ 20 weeks' gestation). The most common pathologic feature observed in unexplained miscarriages was dysmorphic chorionic villi (757 cases; 86.2%), a marker associated with genetic abnormalities. The most common pathologic feature observed in unexplained stillbirths was a small placenta (128 cases; 33.9%). Our classification system reinforced the utility of placental examination for elucidating potential mechanisms behind pregnancy loss. The improved rate of diagnosis appeared to be the result of filling a gap in previous pregnancy loss classification systems via inclusion of the categories of dysmorphic chorionic villi and small placenta.

Intact Chorionic Vesicle in Very Early Products of Conception Specimens: Clinicopathologic Features of 26 Cases That May Mimic Complete Hydatidiform Mole

Among the morphologic mimics of hydatidiform moles, the chorionic vesicle of early first-trimester pregnancy has received scant attention. The chorionic vesicle is the stage of the implanted blastocyst in which the cytotrophoblastic shell is circumferentially lined by primary and secondary villi and envelops the notochord stage embryo, yolk sac, and amniotic sac, ∼5 to 6 weeks since the last menstrual period. Miscarriage specimens at this early gestational age that contain an intact chorionic vesicle may be misinterpreted as a complete hydatidiform mole because of its large size, cistern-like cavity, and circumferentially radiating villi and trophoblast, particularly so when embryonic tissue is absent. We present the clinicopathologic features of 26 products of conception specimens containing a chorionic vesicle, some of which were submitted for consultation as a possible complete mole. The median gestational age was 6 weeks. The majority were free-floating in the specimen, unattached to endometrium. The median diameter was 6.3 mm and ranged up to 11.3 mm. The embryo was absent in 81% of cases, leaving an empty cavity resembling the cistern of a complete mole in all but 2 cases. Most cases exhibited circumferential villi and variable degrees of proliferating polarized villous trophoblast and extravillous trophoblast but trophoblast atypia was absent. Villous stromal karyorrhexis and blue-gray myxoid extracellular stromal matrix were observed in the majority of cases. A minority exhibited focal abnormal villous morphology concerning for early molar pregnancy, including irregular projections (27%), invaginations (12%), or bulbous shapes (4%) of the villous contours and trophoblast pseudoinclusions (15%). In contrast, orderly hierarchical branching of the secondary villi occurred in 31%. p57 immunoexpression was intact in all 25 cases tested. Short tandem repeat genotype testing confirmed a biparental diploid genotype in both of 2 cases tested. Although uncommonly observed in early first-trimester products of conception specimens, the normal chorionic vesicle merits awareness as a potential diagnostic pitfall. While some morphologic features resemble those of a well-developed complete mole, at this early gestational age such features are not expected in a very early complete mole. Attention to the reported gestational age, if available, and presence of embryonic tissues will mitigate against misclassification as complete mole. As with the workup of any potential gestational trophoblastic disease, partnering the clinical and morphologic evaluation with molecular evaluation (intact p57 immunoexpression and lack of any of the characteristic molar genotypes) offers the most precise classification.

Trophoblast inclusions and adverse birth outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Trophoblast inclusions-cross sections of abnormal trophoblast bilayer infoldings-have previously been associated with aneuploidy, placenta accreta, and prematurity. This study was conducted to establish the relationship between trophoblast inclusions and a range of placental, pregnancy, and birth outcomes in a patient population with high smoking and alcohol exposure. Specifically, we sought to evaluate the association between the presence of trophoblast inclusions and 1) three primary birth outcomes: full-term birth, preterm birth, and stillbirth; 2) gestational age at delivery; and 3) specific placental pathologies.

METHODS

Two slides containing chorionic villi were evaluated from 589 placentas that were collected from Stellenbosch University in Cape Town, South Africa as part of the prospective, multicenter cohort Safe Passage Study of the Prenatal Alcohol and SIDS and Stillbirth Network. The subsample included 307 full-term live births, 212 preterm live births, and 70 stillbirths.

RESULTS

We found that the odds of identifying at least one trophoblast inclusion across two slides of chorionic villi was significantly higher for placentas from preterm compared to term liveborn deliveries (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.49, p = 0.002), with an even greater odds ratio for placentas from stillborn compared to term liveborn deliveries (OR = 4.95; 95% CI: 2.78, 8.80, p < 0.001). Gestational age at delivery was inversely associated with trophoblast inclusion frequency. Trophoblast inclusions were significantly associated with small for gestational age birthweight, induction of labor, villous edema, placental infarction, and inflammation of the chorionic plate.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel associations that we report warrant further investigation in order to understand the complex network of biological mechanisms through which the factors that lead to trophoblast inclusions may influence or reflect the trajectory and health of a pregnancy. Ultimately, this line of research may provide critical insights that could inform both clinical and research applications.

The Contribution of QF-PCR and Pathology Studies in the Diagnosis of Diandric Triploidy/Partial Mole

Objective: the aim of our study was to assess the contribution of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and pathology studies in the diagnosis of diandric triploidies/partial hydatidiform moles. Methods: this study included all fet al triploidies diagnosed by QF-PCR in chorionic villi or amniotic fluid in the 2 centers of BCNatal in which a maternal saliva sample was used to establish its parental origin. Pathology studies were performed in products of conception and concordance between a partial hydatidiform mole diagnosis and the finding of a diandric triploidy was assessed. Results: among 46 fetal triploidies, found in 13 ongoing pregnancies and in 33 miscarriages, there were 26 (56%) diandric triploidies. Concordant molecular (diandric triploidy) and pathology results (partial mole) were achieved in 14 cases (54%), while in 6 cases (23%) pathology studies were normal, and in the remaining 6 cases (23%) pathology studies could not be performed because miscarriage was managed medically. Conclusions: diandric triploidy is associated with partial hydatidiform mole and its diagnosis is crucial to prevent the development of persistent trophoblastic disease. QF-PCR analysis in chorionic villi or amniotic fluid provides a more accurate diagnosis of the parental origin of triploidy than the classical pathology studies.

Genetics, not the uterine environment, drive the formation of trophoblast inclusions: Insights from a twin study

INTRODUCTION

Trophoblast inclusions (TIs) are associated with aneuploidy and pregnancy loss and have thus been considered to be a marker of genetic abnormality. However, to date, no study has specifically explored whether TIs are a manifestation of fetal genetics or, rather, the result of the intrauterine environment. The goal of this study was to compare the frequency of TIs in the placentas of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs in order to determine whether the formation of TIs is genetically driven or not.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series of placentas from 48 twin pairs. The placentas were grouped based on zygosity: MZ, DZ, or unknown (UZ). The average number of total TIs per slide was calculated for each twin individual and the mean absolute difference in the total TIs per slide between the twin pairs was calculated for each zygosity group and compared.

RESULTS

The mean difference in the total TIs per slide for DZ twins was significantly greater than the mean difference in the total TIs per slide for MZ twins (p = 0.003). The mean difference in the total TIs per slide for the UZ group was also significantly greater than the mean difference in total TIs per slide between MZ twin pairs (p = 0.028).

DISCUSSION

Our finding that MZ twins were significantly more concordant than DZ twins for the average number of TIs per slide supports the conclusion that TIs are intrinsic to the genetics of the fetus, not the uterine environment.

Trophoblast inclusions in the human placenta: Identification, characterization, quantification, and interrelations of subtypes

We sought to examine placentas enriched for trophoblast inclusions (TIs) in order to characterize, quantify, and examine the interrelations between subtypes of TIs to better understand their underlying biology. We examined a cohort of 600 placentas from deliveries between 200 and 430 weeks of gestation. Forty-five percent of the placentas had at least one TI in the two slides examined. Four percent of the placentas had 10 or more TIs and two placentas had more than 70 TIs. Four distinct TI subtypes were observed: inclusionoids (early forming inclusions), inclusions, calcified inclusions, and calcified bodies. We suggest this reflects a developmental trajectory of TI maturation, the timing of which might be useful when comparing TI expression to clinical outcomes.

Hydatidiform Moles: Ancillary Techniques to Refine Diagnosis

Context.—

Distinction of hydatidiform moles from nonmolar specimens and subclassification of hydatidiform moles as complete hydatidiform mole versus partial hydatidiform mole are important for clinical practice and investigational studies. Risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease and clinical management differ for these entities. Diagnosis based on morphology is subject to interobserver variability and remains problematic, even for experienced gynecologic pathologists.

Objectives.—

To explain how ancillary techniques target the unique genetic features of hydatidiform moles to establish diagnostic truth, highlight the issue of diagnostic reproducibility and importance of diagnostic accuracy, and illustrate use of p57 immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction–based DNA genotyping for diagnosis.

Data Sources.—

Sources are the author's 10-year experience using ancillary techniques for the evaluation of potentially molar specimens in a large gynecologic pathology practice and the literature.

Conclusions.—

The unique genetics of complete hydatidiform moles (purely androgenetic), partial hydatidiform moles (diandric triploid), and nonmolar specimens (biparental, with allelic balance) allow for certain techniques, including immunohistochemical analysis of p57 expression (a paternally imprinted, maternally expressed gene) and genotyping, to refine diagnoses of hydatidiform moles. Although p57 immunostaining alone can identify complete hydatidiform moles, which lack p57 expression because of a lack of maternal DNA, this analysis does not distinguish partial hydatidiform moles from nonmolar specimens because both express p57 because of the presence of maternal DNA. Genotyping, which compares villous and decidual DNA patterns to determine the parental source and ratios of polymorphic alleles, distinguishes purely androgenetic complete hydatidiform moles from diandric triploid partial hydatidiform moles, and both of these from biparental nonmolar specimens. An algorithmic approach to diagnosis using these techniques is advocated.

Characteristics of hydatidiform moles: analysis of a prospective series with p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping

Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C, p57, Kip2) expression and molecular genotyping accurately classify hydatidiform moles into complete and partial types and distinguish these from non-molar specimens. Characteristics of a prospective series of all potentially molar specimens encountered in a large gynecologic pathology practice are summarized. Initially, all specimens were subjected to both analyses; this was later modified to triage cases for genotyping based on p57 results: p57-negative cases diagnosed as complete hydatidiform moles without genotyping; all p57-positive cases genotyped. Of the 678 cases, 645 were definitively classified as complete hydatidiform mole (201), partial hydatidiform mole (158), non-molar (272), and androgenetic/biparental mosaic (14); 33 were unsatisfactory, complex, or problematic. Of the 201 complete hydatidiform moles, 104 were p57-negative androgenetic and an additional 95 were p57-negative (no genotyping), 1 was p57-positive (retained maternal chromosome 11) androgenetic, and 1 was p57-non-reactive androgenetic; 90 (85%) of the 106 genotyped complete hydatidiform moles were monospermic and 16 were dispermic. Of the 158 partial hydatidiform moles, 155 were diandric triploid, with 154 p57-positive, 1 p57-negative (loss of maternal chromosome 11), and 1 p57-non-reactive; 3 were triandric tetraploid, with 2 p57-positive and 1 p57-negative (loss of maternal chromosome 11). Of 155 diandric triploid partial hydatidiform moles, 153 (99%) were dispermic and 2 were monospermic. Of the 272 non-molar specimens, 259 were p57-positive biparental diploid, 5 were p57-positive digynic triploid, 2 were p57-negative biparental diploid (no morphological features of biparental hydatidiform mole), and 6 were p57-non-reactive biparental diploid. Of the 14 androgenetic/biparental mosaics with discordant p57 expression, 6 were uniformly mosaic and 8 had a p57-negative androgenetic molar component. p57 expression is highly correlated with genotyping, serves as a reliable marker for diagnosis of complete hydatidiform moles, and identifies androgenetic cell lines in mosaic conceptions. Cases with aberrant and discordant p57 expression can be correctly classified by genotyping.

Partial hydatidiform mole: histologic parameters in correlation with DNA genotyping

Histologic diagnosis of partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) continues to be problematic, and DNA genotyping has recently become cost-effective for precise separation of PHM from its mimics. We performed a comprehensive reevaluation of histologic parameters of PHM in correlation with DNA genotyping. A total of 143 early abortion specimens were subjected to genotyping as part of the routine workup, resulting in 60 cases of PHM, 52 cases of various chromosomal trisomies, and 31 cases of nonmolar diploid gestations. All available hematoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed retrospectively by 2 gynecologic pathologists blinded to the genotyping results. Significant histologic overlaps were present among genetically confirmed PHM, hydropic abortions, and chromosomal trisomy syndromes. The following morphologic parameters emerged with diagnostic significance for PHM: villus size, presence of 2 villous populations, round or oval pseudoinclusions, at least moderate villous hydrops, cistern formation, and trophoblastic hyperplasia. The most sensitive morphologic features for PHM included villous hydrops (86% sensitivity) or the presence of at least 1 of the following 3 parameters: 2 villous populations, round or oval pseudoinclusions, and cisterns (84% sensitivity). The presence of cisterns and villous size ≥2.5 mm had the highest positive predictive value (90%) for PHM. In conclusion, no single or combined morphologic features are sufficient for definitive diagnosis of PHM. The presence of any one of the following histologic findings should prompt DNA genotyping workup to rule out PHM: round or oval pseudoincludions, cistern formation, 2 populations of villi, and a villous size of ≥2.5 mm.

Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis for both recently trained and experienced gynecologic pathologists

Distinction of hydatidiform moles from nonmolar specimens (NMs) and subclassification of hydatidiform moles as complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) and partial hydatidiform mole (PHM) are important for clinical practice and investigational studies; however, diagnosis based solely on morphology is affected by interobserver variability. Molecular genotyping can distinguish these entities by discerning androgenetic diploidy, diandric triploidy, and biparental diploidy to diagnose CHMs, PHMs, and NMs, respectively. Eighty genotyped cases (27 CHMs, 27 PHMs, 26 NMs) were selected from a series of 200 potentially molar specimens previously diagnosed using p57 immunohistochemistry and genotyping. Cases were classified by 6 pathologists (3 faculty level gynecologic pathologists and 3 fellows) on the basis of morphology, masked to p57 immunostaining and genotyping results, into 1 of 3 categories (CHM, PHM, or NM) during 2 diagnostic rounds; a third round incorporating p57 immunostaining results was also conducted. Consensus diagnoses (those rendered by 2 of 3 pathologists in each group) were also determined. Performance of experienced gynecologic pathologists versus fellow pathologists was compared, using genotyping results as the gold standard. Correct classification of CHMs ranged from 59% to 100%; there were no statistically significant differences in performance of faculty versus fellows in any round (P-values of 0.13, 0.67, and 0.54 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). Correct classification of PHMs ranged from 26% to 93%, with statistically significantly better performance of faculty versus fellows in each round (P-values of 0.04, <0.01, and <0.01 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). Correct classification of NMs ranged from 31% to 92%, with statistically significantly better performance of faculty only in round 2 (P-values of 1.0, <0.01, and 0.61 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). Correct classification of all cases combined ranged from 51% to 75% by morphology and 70% to 80% with p57, with statistically significantly better performance of faculty only in round 2 (P-values of 0.69, <0.01, and 0.15 for rounds 1 to 3, respectively). p57 immunostaining significantly improved recognition of CHMs (P<0.01) and had high reproducibility (κ=0.93 to 0.96) but had no impact on distinction of PHMs and NMs. Genotyping provides a definitive diagnosis for the ∼25% to 50% of cases that are misclassified by morphology, especially those that are also unresolved by p57 immunostaining.

Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis

Distinction of hydatidiform moles (HMs) from nonmolar specimens (NMs) and subclassification of HMs as complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) and partial hydatidiform moles (PHMs) are important for clinical practice and investigational studies; yet, diagnosis based solely on morphology is affected by interobserver variability. Molecular genotyping can distinguish these entities by discerning androgenetic diploidy, diandric triploidy, and biparental diploidy to diagnose CHMs, PHMs, and NMs, respectively. Eighty genotyped cases (27 CHMs, 27 PHMs, and 26 NMs) were selected from a series of 200 potentially molar specimens previously diagnosed using p57 immunostaining and genotyping. Cases were classified by 3 gynecologic pathologists on the basis of H&E slides (masked to p57 immunostaining and genotyping results) into 1 of 3 categories (CHM, PHM, or NM) during 2 diagnostic rounds; a third round incorporating p57 immunostaining results was also conducted. Consensus diagnoses (those rendered by 2 of 3 pathologists) were determined. Genotyping results were used as the gold standard for assessing diagnostic performance. Sensitivity of a diagnosis of CHM ranged from 59% to 100% for individual pathologists and from 70% to 81% by consensus; specificity ranged from 91% to 96% for individuals and from 94% to 98% by consensus. Sensitivity of a diagnosis of PHM ranged from 56% to 93% for individual pathologists and from 70% to 78% by consensus; specificity ranged from 58% to 92% for individuals and from 74% to 85% by consensus. The percentage of correct classification of all cases by morphology ranged from 55% to 75% for individual pathologists and from 70% to 75% by consensus. The κ values for interobserver agreement ranged from 0.59 to 0.73 (moderate to good) for a diagnosis of CHM, from 0.15 to 0.43 (poor to moderate) for PHM, and from 0.13 to 0.42 (poor to moderate) for NM. The κ values for intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.44 to 0.67 (moderate to good). Addition of the p57 immunostain improved sensitivity of a diagnosis of CHM to a range of 93% to 96% for individual pathologists and 96% by consensus; specificity was improved from a range of 96% to 98% for individual pathologists and 96% by consensus; there was no substantial impact on diagnosis of PHMs and NMs. Interobserver agreement for interpretation of the p57 immunostain was 0.96 (almost perfect). Even with morphologic assessment by gynecologic pathologists and p57 immunohistochemistry, 20% to 30% of cases will be misclassified, and, in particular, distinction of PHMs and NMs will remain problematic.

Diagnosis of hydatidiform moles by polymorphic deletion probe fluorescence in situ hybridization

Because products of conception often contain maternal and villous tissues, the determination of maternal and villous genotypes based on genetic polymorphisms can help discern maternal and paternal chromosomal contribution and aid in the diagnosis of hydatidiform moles. Polymorphic deletion probe (PDP) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes based on copy number variants are highly polymorphic and allow in situ determination of genetic identity. By using three informative PDPs on chromosomes 2p, 4q, and 8p, we compared maternal with villous genotypes and determined the ploidy of villous tissue. PDP FISH was performed on 13 complete moles, 13 partial moles, 13 nonmolar abortions, and an equivocal hydropic abortion. PDP FISH permitted definitive diagnosis of complete moles in five of 13 cases for which maternal and villous genotypes were mutually exclusive. A complete mole was highly suspected when all three PDP loci showed homozygous villous genotypes. The diagnosis of a complete mole by PDP FISH yielded a theoretical test sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 91.8%, an observed test sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 92.3%. Triploidy was observed in all partial moles, in which diandric triploidy was confirmed in six cases. In the equivocal hydropic abortion, PDP FISH combined with p57 immunofluorescence revealed placental androgenetic/biparental mosaicism. PDP FISH can be used in clinical practice and research studies to subclassify hydatidiform moles and evaluate unusual products of conception.

Abnormal villous morphology associated with triple trisomy of paternal origin

The vast majority of trisomies in spontaneous abortions (SAB) are single and of maternal origin, most frequently due to meiosis I errors. Triple trisomies are exceedingly rare (approximately 0.05% of spontaneous abortions), most often of maternal origin, and associated with increased maternal age. Some trisomic SAB specimens can exhibit abnormal villous morphology simulating a partial hydatidiform mole, a distinct form of hydatidiform mole characterized by diandric triploidy. A SAB specimen from a 27-year-old woman, G1P0 at 8 weeks gestational age, was reviewed in consultation to address the finding of morphological features suggestive of a partial hydatidiform mole but DNA ploidy analysis yielding a diploid result. The villi were irregularly shaped and hydropic but lacked trophoblastic hyperplasia; p57 expression was retained. Since fully developed features of a partial hydatidiform mole were lacking, additional analysis was performed. Molecular genotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis demonstrated biparental diploidy with trisomy of chromosomes 7, 13, and 20, all of paternal origin. The three trisomies may have originated from paternal meiosis II errors, or from mitotic nondisjunction. We believe this to be the first report of triple trisomy in a SAB confirmed to be of paternal origin.

Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization, p57 immunostaining, flow cytometry, and digital image analysis for diagnosing molar and nonmolar products of conception

Pathologic examination of products of conception (POC) is used to differentiate hydropic abortus (HA), partial hydatidiform mole (PM), and complete hydatidiform mole (CM). Histologic classification of POC specimens can be difficult, and ancillary testing is often required for a definitive diagnosis. This study evaluated 66 POC specimens by flow cytometry, digital image analysis, p57 immunohistochemical analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The final diagnosis, based on the combined analysis of all test results, included 33 HAs, 24 PMs, and 9 CMs. The p57 immunostain identified 9 CMs that were evaluated as nontriploid by all other techniques. FISH seems to have the best accuracy (100%) for determining whether a specimen contains a triploid chromosome complement. These data suggest that the combination of p57 and FISH seems to be the best ancillary testing strategy to aid pathologists in the appropriate identification of CM, PM, and HA in POC specimens.

Combination of immunohistochemistry and ploidy analysis to assist histopathological diagnosis of molar diseases

Background:

Differential diagnosis between hydropic abortion, partial mole and complete mole is still a challenge for pathologists but really important for patient management.

Material and Method:

In this study, we have evaluated 111 products of conception from the first trimester. Histological analysis was made according to the main diagnostic histopathological features described in the literature and the cases were categorized in hydropic abortus (HA), partial mole (PM) and complete mole (CM). Immunohistochemistry was performed using monoclonal antibody against p57^kip protein a putative paternally imprinted inhibitor gene and DNA ploidy was analysed in all cases by image cytometry.

Results:

All 23 HAs presented a diploid DNA content and were p57^kip2 positive. From the 28 CMs, 12 cases (43%) were diploid and 16 cases (57%) were tetraploid but no expression of p57^kip2 was found with positive internal controls. From the 60 PMs, 58 cases were positive for p57^kip2 expression and 53 cases (88%) were triploid, 6 cases (10%) tetraploid and 1 case (2%) diploid.

Conclusion:

This study on 111 cases of early pregnancies confirms the usefulness of immunohistochemistry and cytometry but demonstrates the importance of the combination of both techniques to assist histology for the best reliable diagnosis.

Morphological, immunohistochemical and chromosome in situ hybridization in the differential diagnosis of Hydatidiform Mole and Hydropic Abortion

OBJECTIVE

To explore the utility of histological, immunohistochemical and chromosome in situ hybridization (CISH) test in the differential diagnosis of Complete Hydatidiform Mole (CHM), Partial Hydatidiform Mole (PHM) and Hydropic Abortion (HA).

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed the histological characteristics, p57kip2 and Factor VIII expression and CISH test in 38 cases with some diagnostic concerns, comprising 13 CHM, 14 PHM and 11 HA.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that p57kip2 expression and the ploidy assessed by CISH were essential for the reclassification of 2 cases, one from CHM to PHM and another from PHM to HA, as well as for confirming the previous diagnosis in cases where there were conflicting features. p57kip2 expression is diagnostic if no cells at all present it (CHM) or when there are over 10% of cells expressing it (PHM and HA).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that there is no single criterion for the distinction of CHM, PHM and HA. So p57kip2 expression and CISH test can be used in association with the histological findings for the differential diagnosis of the three conditions in cases presenting some concern for definitive diagnosis.

Complete mole coexistent with a twin fetus

We report two cases of a complete hydatidiform mole coexistent with a live fetus diagnosed by DNA polymorphism analysis. A 27-year-old woman revealed symptoms of pre-eclampsia and ultrasound showed multicystic tumor and placenta coexistent with a live fetus at 16 weeks' gestation. The placenta with partly hydropic change and the fetus without anomaly were consequently evacuated. Another 30-year-old woman had a multicystic mass attached to a normal placenta with a 20-week live fetus on ultrasound examination. A hysterotomy was carried out because of persistent bleeding due to placenta previa. In both cases, DNA was extracted from the placental tissue and the tumor, as well as from maternal and paternal blood. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the placental tumor consisted of only paternal origin, which is consistent with the diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Hydatidiform Mole

Surgical pathologists often encounter hydropic villi in products of conception at the first trimester and must determine whether the villi represent complete hydatidiform mole (CM), partial hydatidiform mole (PM), or hydropic abortion (HA). The distinction between these is important for determining the appropriate treatment of patients. This study assessed interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histologic diagnosis of hydatidiform mole among 5 placental pathologists. To evaluate interobserver variability, one representative slide from each of 50 mixed cases of PM, CM, and HA of the first trimester were circulated among 5 placental pathologists. All pathologists used the same histologic criteria by Szulman and Surti. For the second round, the same cases were submitted with DNA ploidy data. For the third round, the slides were recoded and distributed to assess intraobserver agreement. Kappa (kappa) value was calculated for the interobserver agreement in the first and second rounds. There was agreement among 4 or 5 pathologists for only 30 of 50 cases in the first round. There were problems in differentiating between PM and HA in most of the remaining 20 cases. The kappa values varied from poor (kappa = -0.104) to excellent (kappa = 0.761) in the first round. In the second round, there was agreement in 39 of 50 cases and the level of agreement remarkably increased, ranging from fair to good (kappa = 0.552) to excellent (kappa = 0.851). The number of discrepant cases, PM versus HA, was reduced to 4. In 7 cases, there were difficulties in distinguishing CM from HA. The intraobserver agreement ranged from 50% to 90%. Poor interobserver agreement was demonstrated when histology alone was used for diagnosis. Discordance was most frequently seen in PM versus HA and resulted from difficulty in evaluating trophoblastic hyperplasia. Polar trophoblastic growth seen in HA could also be observed in PM. The addition of ploidy data resulted in a significant improvement in concordance. Ploidy study is useful in equivocal cases. Significant interobserver and intraobserver variability was observed even among placental pathologists. New histologic criteria adaptable to differentiation of early lesions are needed.

p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry in early molar pregnancies: emphasis on its complementary role in the differential diagnosis of hydropic abortuses

Morphologic examination still forms the main diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of molar pregnancies. However, the criteria are subjective and show considerable interobserver variability among pathologists. Once a diagnosis of molar pregnancy is made, DNA ploidy studies help to differentiate a triploid partial mole from diploid complete mole (CM). However, with earlier diagnosis and therapeutic evacuation of molar pregnancies, the differentiation of molar pregnancies from early nonmolar placentation is becoming increasingly difficult. The p57(KIP2) gene ( CDKN1C ) is strongly paternally imprinted and expressed from the maternal allele. Because CM lacks a maternal genome, p57(KIP2) immunostaining is correspondingly absent, whereas hydropic abortuses and partial mole show positive staining. We compared the use of p57(KIP2) staining in the differential diagnosis of 68 morphologically challenging cases of early first-trimester hydropic placentas. Diagnosis based on p57(KIP2) staining was compared with the original diagnosis based on morphology and DNA ploidy analysis. Concordant results were obtained in 65 of 68 cases studied. In 2 of 3 cases with a discordant diagnosis, microsatellite DNA genotyping analysis agreed with the results of p57(KIP2) staining, confirming that positive p57(KIP2) staining is a highly sensitive and specific marker for excluding CM in this setting. In addition, p57(KIP2) staining has the advantage of differentiating hydropic abortuses from CMs, a distinction not made by ploidy analysis. p57(KIP2) staining can be used in concert with ploidy studies to refine the diagnosis of early molar pregnancies.

Metastatic trophoblastic disease after an initial diagnosis of partial hydatidiform mole: genotyping and chromosome in situ hybridization analysis

BACKGROUND

Hydatidiform mole (HM) is classified into partial (PHM) and complete (CHM) subtypes according to histopathologic and genetic criteria. Traditionally, it is believed that PHM carries a better prognosis and rarely develops metastasis. However, making a distinction between PHM and CHM using histologic criteria alone may be difficult.

METHODS

The authors used fluorescent microsatellite genotyping following laser-capture microdissection and chromosome in situ hybridization (CISH) to perform a genetic analysis of six patients with histologically diagnosed PHM who subsequently developed metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

RESULTS

Patients ranged in age from 25 years to 44 years (mean, 33.2 years). The gestational age of the molar pregnancies varied from 6 weeks to 20 weeks. All six patients had pulmonary metastases, with additional liver metastasis in two patients. Among the six patients with histologically diagnosed PHM, it was found that four patients had a diploid karyotype and no maternal alleles; thus, their neoplasms actually were CHM. Maternal genome was detected in the remaining two patients consistent with a biparental origin, and these patients had a triploid karyotype. CISH findings in all patients correlated with the genotyping findings. Triploid HM had maternally derived alleles, whereas diploid HMs were purely androgenetic.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, which may be the largest series of genetically analyzed metastatic PHMs to date, the difficulty of histologic distinction between PHM and CHM was confirmed. Molecular analysis may help to refine the classification of HM. Although the current findings support the belief that most aggressive trophoblastic diseases are derived from CHM, a small number of PHMs do progress to metastatic disease. Thus, the current study reaffirmed that all patients with HM should be followed closely irrespective of histologic subclassification.

Analysis of gestational trophoblastic disease by genotyping and chromosome in situ hybridization

Hydatidiform mole is classified into partial and complete subtypes according to histopathological and genetic criteria. Distinction between the two by histology alone may be difficult. Genetically, a complete mole is diploid without maternal contribution, whereas a partial mole is triploid with a maternal chromosome complement. To assess the accuracy of histological diagnosis by correlating with the genetic composition, we performed fluorescent microsatellite genotyping to detect the presence or absence of maternal genome in a hydatidiform mole and carried out chromosome in situ hybridization to analyze the ploidy. For genotyping analysis, paraffin sections of 36 complete and nine partial moles, diagnosed according to histological criteria, were microdissected and DNA was separately extracted from the decidua and molar villi. Six pairs of primers that flank polymorphic microsatellite repeat sequences on five different chromosomes were used. In all, 34 cases, including 31 complete moles and three partial moles diagnosed histologically, showed no maternal contribution by genotyping; thus these could be genetically considered as complete mole. The other 11 cases (five complete moles and six partial moles previously diagnosed by histology) showed the presence of maternal contribution and were genetically diagnosed as partial moles. The genotyping results correlated with histological evaluation in 88% (37/45) of hydatidiform mole and correlated with chromosome in situ hybridization findings in all the cases, that is, triploid hydatidiform moles had maternal-derived alleles, while diploid hydatidiform moles were purely androgenetic. Compared with genetic diagnosis, histological evaluation was more reliable for the diagnosis of a complete mole (91%, 31/34) than that of a partial mole (55%, 6/11) (P=0.0033). Seven complete moles and three partial moles diagnosed genetically developed gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. To conclude, genotyping and chromosome in situ hybridization can provide reliable adjunct to histology for the classification of a hydatidiform mole, especially in cases with difficult histological evaluation and early gestational age. As a partial mole still carries a risk of developing gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, follow-up is considered necessary for both complete and partial moles.

Refining the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole: image ploidy analysis and p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry

AIM

To determine whether image analysis of ploidy status and immunohistochemical analysis of p57KIP2 (a paternally imprinted, maternally expressed gene) can be used to refine the diagnosis of molar pregnancy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The original histological diagnosis in 40 randomly selected cases of hydatidiform mole was reviewed and confirmed in 38 cases (22 complete moles, 16 partial moles). These cases were anonymized and submitted for further analysis. Tissue from each case was submitted for flow cytometric assessment of DNA ploidy using a FACSort flow cytometer and for automated image cytometric assessment using a novel digital imaging system. Tissue sections from each case were immunostained with a monoclonal mouse antibody to p57KIP2. Correlations between the histopathological diagnosis, image cytometry, flow cytometry and p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry were determined using kappa statistics. The concordance between histological diagnosis and p57KIP2 was very good (kappa = 0.89). Twenty of the 22 (90.9%) complete moles showed no immunoreactivity for p57KIP2. The remaining two cases showed nuclear immunoreactivity in villous cytotrophoblast. In one of these, the pattern of staining resembled that of a partial mole. In the other, the staining pattern supported the diagnosis of a twin molar/non-molar pregnancy. All 16 partial moles were p57KIP2 immunoreactive. On flow cytometry, all 22 complete moles were diploid and 12/16 partial moles were triploid (the remaining four cases originally diagnosed as partial moles were found to be diploid). On image cytometry, one case originally diagnosed as complete mole was found to contain a triploid population. Thus, by using a combination of image cytometry and p57KIP2 status we were able to refine the diagnosis of molar pregnancy in five (13%) of the cases studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated image cytometry is a readily performed investigation which is comparable to, but more sensitive than, flow cytometry. Complementary use of ploidy analysis and p57KIP2 status can now help to distinguish a diploid hydropic miscarriage (p57KIP2-positive), diploid complete mole (p57KIP2-negative) and triploid partial mole (p57KIP2-positive).

Partial hydatidiform mole: clinicopathological features, differential diagnosis, ploidy and molecular studies, and gold standards for diagnosis

Partial hydatidiform mole is optimally diagnosed histopathologically when four microscopic features coexist: 1) two populations of villi, 2) enlarged villi (> or = 3-4 mm) with central captivation, 3) irregular villi with geographic, scalloped borders with trophoblast inclusions, and 4) trophoblast hyperplasia (usually focal and involving syncytiotrophoblast). Pathologic mimics of partial mole include Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, placental angiomatous malformation, twin gestation with complete mole and existing fetus, early complete hydatidiform mole, and hydropic spontaneous abortion. Because partial hydatidiform mole results from diandric triploidy, flow cytometry (or another method to assess ploidy) can be utilized by pathologists for supporting diagnostic classification of problematic specimens, or for educational or quality assurance purposes. Confirmation of the histopathologic diagnosis by ploidy or molecular studies is important for scientific reports of partial hydatidiform mole, especially when unusual or aggressive outcomes (such as choriocarcinoma) are reported.

Discrimination of complete hydatidiform mole from its mimics by immunohistochemistry of the paternally imprinted gene product p57KIP2

The p57KIP2 protein is a cell cycle inhibitor and tumor suppressor encoded by a strongly paternally imprinted gene. We explored the utility of p57KIP2 as a diagnostic marker in hydatidiform mole, a disease likely the result of abnormal dosage and consequent misexpression of imprinted genes. Using a monoclonal antibody on paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissue sections, the authors evaluated p57KIP2 expression in normal placenta and in 149 gestations including 59 complete hydatidiform moles, 39 PHMs, and 51 spontaneous losses with hydropic changes. p57KIP2 was strongly expressed in cytotrophoblast and villous mesenchyme in normal placenta, all cases of partial hydatidiform moles (39 of 39) and all spontaneous losses with hydropic changes (51 of 51). In contrast, p57KIP2 expression in cytotrophoblast and villous mesenchyme was absent or markedly decreased in 58 of 59 complete hydatidiform moles. In all gestations p57KIP2 was strongly expressed in decidua and in intervillous trophoblast islands, which served as internal positive controls for p57KIP2 immunostaining. p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry can reliably identify most cases of complete hydatidiform mole irrespective of gestational age and is thus a useful diagnostic adjunct, complementary to ploidy analysis, in the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole.

Over-diagnosis of hydatidiform mole in early tubal ectopic pregnancy

AIMS

Tubal ectopic hydatidiform moles are rare lesions, and only 40 cases have been reported in the world literature. We investigated the apparently high incidence of tubal ectopic hydatidiform moles in women referred for treatment to a Supraregional Trophoblastic Tumour Screening and Treatment Centre between 1986 and 1996.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 4261 women referred during the study period, 25 (0.6%) had a suspected tubal ectopic hydatidiform mole and paraffin-embedded tissue was available in 20 (80%) of these. Each case was reviewed by two pathologists and DNA flow cytometric analysis was undertaken when the histological diagnosis was initially deemed equivocal or suggestive of hydatidiform mole. On review, 17 cases (85%) showed no evidence of hydatidiform mole (circumferential trophoblastic proliferation, hydrops, scalloped villi, and stromal karyorrhexis). Of these, 11 cases (65%) showed features of early placentation and six (35%) showed hydropic abortion. DNA flow cytometry was performed in 14 (82%) of these cases and revealed a diploid population in each case. Three cases of molar pregnancy (15%) were identified. Each of these cases had the histological features of an early complete hydatidiform mole. Sufficient tissue was available for DNA flow cytometric analysis in two of these cases and confirmed the presence of diploidy in each.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that tubal ectopic hydatidiform mole is a rare entity and demonstrate that it is over-diagnosed. Polar trophoblastic proliferation and hydropic villi are features of early placentation and of hydropic abortion. Sheets of extravillous trophoblast may be particularly prominent in tubal ectopic gestation. In the absence of circumferential trophoblastic proliferation combined with hydropic change a diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease should be avoided.

Flow cytometric and clinicopathologic study of complete hydatidiform moles with special reference to the significance of cytometric aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

As complete hydatidiform moles (CMs) have been studied less with respect to aneuploidy and its clinical implications, the significance of cytometric aneuploidy in CMs was evaluated.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-nine CMs were studied clinicopathologically and analyzed by flow cytometry using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

RESULTS

Of 239 CMs, 182 were diploid, 30 were tetraploid, and 27 were aneuploid (nontriploid/tetraploid aneuploid). There were no significant histologic differences among the diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid CMs. Persistent disease developed in 20 of 114 CMs (17.6%) (16 of 77 diploid, 4 of 18 tetraploid, and none of 19 aneuploid CMs). Eight diploid and three tetraploid CMs were invasive, and one patient each with diploid CM and tetraploid CM developed choriocarcinoma and none of 19 patients with aneuploid CMs had sequelae.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that aneuploid CMs are associated with less risk for persistent disease than diploid or tetraploid CMs. DNA ploidy status may be an independent predictor of persistent disease.

In routine diagnostic practice, how many sections should we examine from cases of products of conception?

In order to determine whether a single representative section taken from routine specimens of products of conception would contain sufficient material to trigger a more comprehensive search for the features of a hydatidiform mole, cases of gestational trophoblastic disease submitted over a five year period were reviewed. Partial hydatidiform moles were either suspected or diagnosed on the first histological section in 46 (92%) cases. In the remaining four cases, although abundant placental tissue showing diagnostic features was available in later blocks, most of the tissue in the first block consisted of endometrial tissue with only occasional chorionic villi being identified. The current study shows that a molar gestation can be suspected after examining a single tissue block, providing that it contains a representative number of chorionic villi. If a molar pregnancy is suspected clinically or pathologically, additional blocks should be examined to secure the diagnosis and classify the condition.

Prevalence of the partial molar phenotype in triploidy of maternal and paternal origin

Triploid partial moles are at risk for trophoblastic neoplasia, yet the prevalence, parent of origin, and evolution of the partial molar phenotype amongst all triploids remains controversial. We determined parental origin by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, stage of development by gross and histological criteria, and partial molar status according to strict diagnostic criteria for all triploids identified amongst 1,054 consecutively karyotyped spontaneous abortions. Triploidy was detected in 64 of 832 successfully karyotyped specimens. Complete data were collected in 59 cases. Diandric origin was found in 39 specimens, and 20 of these fulfilled all four criteria for partial mole (trophoblast hyperplasia, dimorphic population of large and small villi, villous hydrops greater than 0.5 mm, and irregular villous contour). We separated the 19 diandric triploids not fulfilling all criteria for partial mole into four groups: specimens of early developmental stage, which we believed represented developing ("early") partial moles (n = 3), cases of late developmental stage, which we believed represented involuting ("ancient") partial moles (n = 4), cases showing some but not all criteria for partial mole (n = 7), and specimens with few if any criteria suggestive of partial mole (n = 5). In triploids of digynic origin (n = 20), developmental stage was significantly lower, fetal tissue was more frequently identified, and all specimens showed well-preserved fetal red blood cells. Digynic triploids occasionally showed irregular contour, dimorphic villi, and a mild form of trophoblast hyperplasia but never showed hydropic degeneration and were never suspicious for partial mole.

The role of deoxyribonucleic acid image cytometric and interphase cytogenetic analyses in the differential diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical follow-up of hydatidiform moles. A report from the Central Molar Registration in The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy in the differential diagnosis and clinical follow-up of hydatidiform moles, the histopathologic features, deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy, and clinical follow-up were compared in 347 cases: 143 complete moles, 52 partial moles, and 152 abortions, of which 56 cases were hydropic abortions with histologic features of triploidy but lacked trophoblastic hyperplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

In all cases deoxyribonucleic acid image cytometry was performed, and in 85 of these cases interphase cytogenetics was also performed.

RESULTS

With use of deoxyribonucleic acid image cytometry and interphase cytogenetics, a bimodal polyploid deoxyribonucleic acid pattern was present in 97% of complete moles, 27% of partial moles, and 4% of abortions. All these cases of partial mole were reclassified to complete mole on the basis of this deoxyribonucleic acid pattern and the histopathologic features in spite of the presence of fetal blood cells, amnion, or yolk sac. Deoxyribonucleic acid triploidy was found in 95% of the remaining partial moles, in 77% of hydropic abortions with histologic features of triploidy, and in 14% of the remaining abortions. Reliable differentiation between deoxyribonucleic acid triploid partial moles and hydropic abortions with histologic features of triploidy was not possible on basis of the histopathologic features (trophoblastic hyperplasia) or 3.5c exceeding rates. Deoxyribonucleic acid diploidy was found in 1% of complete moles, 23% of hydropic abortions with features of triploidy, and 78% of the remaining abortions. Deoxyribonucleic acid tetraploidy was rarely found (1% of complete moles, 2% of partial moles, 1% of abortions). Persistent gestational trophoblastic disease developed in 33% of the bimodal deoxyribonucleic acid polyploid cases (all complete moles), in 1% of the diploid cases (concerning one of the two diploid complete moles), and in 1% of the triploid cases (partial moles).

CONCLUSION

Deoxyribonucleic acid analysis is essential in the diagnosis of hydatidiform moles to decide on clinical follow-up.

Molecular identification of a partial hydatidiform mole

Specimens of a vacuum curettage were microscopically indicated for a hydatidiform mole. The combination of three different approaches identified the specimen as a partial mole caused by the fertilization of a haploid ovum by sperm containing a haploid or diploid nucleus with one or two sets of paternal genetic material. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization identified three chromosome 1 centromeres, and DNA flow cytometry revealed a peak with a DNA index of 1.50. The combination of flow cytometric cell sorting and microsatellite marker polymerase chain reaction proved that in this case two alleles were from paternal origin. Because it is known that partial hydatidiform moles have a tendency for recurrence, specimens from the same patient of an earlier executed vacuum curettage were investigated. Microdissection of the villi was performed before DNA isolation in this case as too few villi were present for DNA flow cytometry and cell sorting. In this case, no evidence was fond for additional alleles. This study shows the diagnostic potential of microsatellite markers for genetic typing of hydatidiform moles.

Problems in the histological assessment of hydatidiform moles: a study on consensus diagnosis and ploidy status by fluorescent in situ hybridisation

Hydropic villi in products of conception continue to pose a diagnostic problem for the anatomical pathologist. It is important to distinguish between complete hydatidiform mole (CM), partial hydatidiform mole (PM) and hydropic degeneration (HD), as hydatidiform moles (especially CM) have a tendency to develop persistent trophoblastic disease. Several studies have demonstrated interobserver variability in the diagnosis of the three conditions, but there have been no studies testing the accuracy of the consensus diagnosis of pathologists experienced in the field. In this study four anatomical pathologists with experience in diagnosing hydatidiform moles selected five cases of HD, seven cases of PM and ten cases of CM on the basis of consensus diagnosis using established criteria. Ploidy studies were done on these 22 cases using fluorescent in situ hybridisation. The 15 cases of HD and CM were diploid, confirming the histological diagnosis. However only five of the seven cases of PM were triploid, the other two being diploid. Review of these two diploid cases showed a mixture of small and large villi with moderate to marked trophoblastic proliferation. On the basis of the significant trophoblastic proliferation and the DNA information, the two cases were reclassified as early complete moles. This study demonstrates that even pathologists experienced in the field have difficulty separating PM from CM. The findings suggest that, in the absence of DNA information, a lesion with hydropic villi showing moderate to marked trophoblastic proliferation should be classified as a complete mole, even if there is a mixture of small and large villi. Ploidy studies are an important adjunct to histological diagnosis, especially when there is an overlap of features.

Incidence of hydatidiform mole in a Tokyo hospital: a 5-year (1989 to 1993) prospective, morphological, and flow cytometric study

This prospective study reports the incidence of hydatidiform mole (HM) in a population of 13,510 pregnancies in a Tokyo hospital over a 5-year period between 1989 and 1993. During this period all "products of conception" from first- and second-trimester abortions were histologically reviewed, and 76 hydropic placentas were retrieved and analyzed by flow cytometry (FCM). Of 23 specimens originally diagnosed as complete hydatidiform mole (CM), 21 were diploid, and two were aneuploid (nontriploid/tetraploid). Of 22 partial hydatidiform moles (PMs), 20 were triploid, and two were diploid. Of 31 hydropic abortions (HAs), 20 were diploid, nine were triploid, one was tetraploid, and one was aneuploid. As to the correlation between morphology and data of FCM, two PMs were reclassified as HA, and eight HAs as PM, giving a ratio of 1 CM to 1.22 PM (23:28 cases). The incidence of HM was 1:265 pregnancies, (CM, 1:587; PM, 1:483). Only one case (3.6%) of PM was suspected clinically. One specimen of persistent disease occurred following a diploid CM. In our retrospective histological and FCM study in which 172 cases diagnosed as HM were retrieved from surgical pathology files between 1981 and 1991, there were 129 CMs and 43 PMs (CMs:PMs = 3:1). These findings indicate that PM is a common but underdiagnosed condition. Almost all studies in the literature may have severely underreported the incidence of PM. It is suggested that during routine delivery and pathology examination only the most florid PMs are recognized, whereas most with subtler changes go undiagnosed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ploidy analysis by flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in hydropic placentas and gestational trophoblastic disease

Placentas with hydropic change may be hydropic degeneration (HD) or gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), partial (PM) or complete (CM) hydatidiform mole. The separation of HD from PM and PM from CM by histological findings may be problematic in some cases and can be clarified with ploidy analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a probe to chromosome 7 (D7Z1) was applied to tissue cut from paraffin blocks from 10 histologically representative cases each of HD, PM, and CM on which ploidy had been previously confirmed by flow cytometry from paraffin embedded tissue. Villous stromal cells and nonproliferative trophoblast were examined for number of signals/cell and percentage of cells/placenta with three hybridization signals. The mean number of hybridization signals/cell was HD 1.14; PM 1.79; and CM 1.17, with statistical significance between HD and PM (P < .0001), and PM and CM (P < .0001). The mean percentage of cells/placenta with three hybridization signals was HD 1.10%, PM 23.1%, and CM 2.11%, with statistical significance between HD and PM (P < .0001), and PM and CM (P < .0001). In addition, there was no overlap in the mean percentage of cells with three hybridization signals between HD and PM, and PM and CM. Chromosome 2 probe (D2Z1) was applied to tissues that had three chromosome 7 signals to exclude trisomy, and in all cases three signals were present confirming triploidy in PM. FISH can identify diploid and triploid hydropic placentas in paraffin-embedded tissue to assist in differentiating HD from PM, and PM from CM.

Flow cytometric and clinicopathologic study of 197 hydatidiform moles with special reference to the significance of cytometric aneuploidy and literature review

In order to evaluate the significance of cytometric aneuploidy in molar placentas, we analyzed 197 hydatidiform moles by flow cytometry using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Of 150 complete moles (CMs), 110 were diploid, 26 were tetraploid, and 14 were aneuploid (non-triploid/tetraploid aneuploid). Of 47 partial moles (PMs), 44 were triploid and 3 were diploid. We could not find any histologic differences among the diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid CMs. We found that flow cytometric DNA analysis was very helpful to differentiate CM from PM. Persistent diseases developed in 12 of 69 CMs (17.4%) (9 of 47 diploid and 3 of 14 tetraploid CMs) and in none of 26 PMs (0%). Four diploid and 2 tetraploid CMs were invasive and one each with diploid and tetraploid CM developed choriocarcinoma and none of 8 aneuploid CMs had sequelae; however, there was no correlation between DNA ploidy and clinical outcome in the CMs. These results suggest that cytometric aneuploidy (non-diploidy) in CMs is not an independent predictor of persistent disease.

Histopathologic study of partial hydatidiform moles and DNA triploid placentas

Sixty-two placentas with a triploid DNA content, which were analyzed by flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissues, were histologically investigated. These placentas were histologically classified as follows: 51 partial hydatidiform moles (PM), two hydropic abortuses and nine non-hydropic placentas. The DNA indices of the triploid peaks were between 1.41 and 1.60. Histologically, two populations of normal and edematous villi, vesicular villous edema with cistern formation, focal syncytiotrophoblastic hyperplasia with vacuolation, and villous scalloping with trophoblastic inclusion were almost always observed in the PM, but no single pathologic feature was specific for PM. The two entities, PM and triploid placenta, overlapped. Not all triploid gestations are PM and not all PM moles are triploid as shown in previously reported diploid or tetraploid PM. Although no patient with triploid PM developed persistent disease in this series, follow up of triploid PM is required as long as its true biological potential remains unclear. Flow cytometry is a reliable aid in the diagnosis of PM.

Distinctive flow histogram pattern in molar pregnancies with elevated maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels

BACKGROUND

Flow cytometric analysis of trophoblastic tissue has shown that most partial hydatidiform moles (PMs) are triploid, whereas most complete moles (CMs) are diploid or tetraploid. Ploidy analysis can support a diagnosis of CM or PM. However, in some cases, a precise diagnosis cannot be rendered.

METHODS

This study examined DNA flow histograms in 86 cases of histologically diagnosed moles and nonmoles to identify patterns specific to moles to eliminate indeterminate diagnoses. Forty hydropic abortions, 17 CMs, and 29 PMs were analyzed, and results were correlated with microscopic appearance and maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels.

RESULTS

Analysis of nondiploid histologic moles in which the initial maternal serum HCG level was greater than 150,000 mIU/ml showed similar histograms in 12 of 14 cases. In these 12 specimens, a distinct aneuploid peak could not be delineated from multiple cell populations between the G0/G1 and G2/M or G0/G1diploid and G0/G1aneuploid peaks. This commonly appeared as a slope rising toward the tetraploid region. S-phase fraction values showed a trend toward higher values in the moles versus nonmoles, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This sloping histogram pattern may reflect progression from a single aneuploid to multiple aneuploid populations. Its statistically significant correlation (P < 0.001) with high maternal serum HCG values suggests the presence of a highly metabolically active population of aneuploid trophoblast. Because it appears specific to nondiploid moles, recognition of the pattern will aid in the distinction of mole from hydropic spontaneous abortion.