1
|
Ding GX, Homann KL. The effects of different photon beam energies in stereotactic radiosurgery with cones. Med Phys 2023; 50:5201-5211. [PMID: 37122235 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relies on small fields to ablate lesions. Currently, linac based treatment is delivered via circular cones using a 6 MV beam. There is interest in both lower energy photon beams, which can offer steeper dose fall off as well as higher energy photon beams, which have higher dose rates, thus reducing radiation delivery times. Of interest in this study is the 2.5 MV beam developed for imaging applications and both the 6 and 10 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams, which can achieve dose rates up to 2400 cGy/min. PURPOSE This study aims to assess the benefit and feasibility among different energy beams ranging from 2.5 to 10 MV beams by evaluating the dosimetric effects of each beam and comparing the dose to organs-at-risk (OARs) for two separate patient plans. One based on a typical real patient tremor utilizing a 4 mm cone and the other a typical brain metastasis delivered with a 10 mm cone. METHODS The Monte Carlo codes BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc were used to generate beams of 2.5 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 6 MV-SRS, 6 MV, 10 MV-FFF, and 10 MV from a Varian TrueBeam except 6 MV-SRS, which is taken from a Varian TX model linear accelerator. Each beam's energy spectrum, mean energy, %dd curve, and dose profile were obtained by analyzing the simulated beams. Calculated patient dose distributions were compared among six different energy beam configurations based on a realistic treatment plan for thalamotomy and a conventional brain metastasis plan. Dose to OARs were evaluated using dose-volume histograms for the same target dose coverage. RESULTS The mean energies of photons within the primary beam projected area were insensitive to cone sizes and the values of percentage depth-dose curves (%dd) at d = 5 cm and SSD = 95 cm for a 4 mm (10 mm) cone ranges from 62.6 (64.4) to 82.2 (85.7) for beam energy ranging from 2.5 to 10 MV beams, respectively. Doses to OARs were evaluated among these beams based on real treatment plans delivering 15 000 and 2200 cGy to the target with a 4 and 10 mm cone, respectively. The maximum doses to the brainstem, which is 10 mm away from the isocenter, was found to be 434 (300), 632 (352), 691 (362), 733 (375), 822 (403), and 975 (441) cGy for 2.5 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 6 MV-SRS, 6 MV, 10 MV-FFF, and 10 MV beams delivering 15 000 (2200) cGy target dose, respectively. CONCLUSION Using the 6 MV-SRS as reference, changes of the maximum dose (691 cGy) to the brain stem are -37%, -9%, +6%, +19%, and 41% for 2.5 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 6 MV, 10 MV-FFF, and 10 MV beams, respectively, based on the thalamotomy plan, where the "-" or "+" signs indicate the percentage decrease or increase. Changes of the maximum dose (362 cGy) to brain stem, based on the brain metastasis plan are much less for respective beam energies. The sum of 21 arcs beam-on time was 39 min on our 6 MV-SRS beam with 1000 cGy/min for thalamotomy. The beam-on time can be reduced to 16 min with 10 MV-FFF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kenneth L Homann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kry SF, Alvarez P, Cygler JE, DeWerd LA, Howell RM, Meeks S, O'Daniel J, Reft C, Sawakuchi G, Yukihara EG, Mihailidis D. AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs. Med Phys 2019; 47:e19-e51. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F. Kry
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | - Paola Alvarez
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
| | | | | | | | - Sanford Meeks
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center Orlando FL USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knisely JP, Apuzzo ML. Historical Aspects of Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Concepts, People, and Devices. World Neurosurg 2019; 130:593-607. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
4
|
Xue J, Emami B, Grimm J, Kubicek GJ, Asbell SO, Lanciano R, Welsh JS, Peng L, Quon H, Laub W, Gui C, Spoleti N, Das IJ, Goldman HW, Redmond KJ, Kleinberg LR, Brady LW. Clinical evidence for dose tolerance of the central nervous system in hypofractionated radiotherapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s13566-018-0367-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
5
|
Ding GX, Walters B. Dosimetric effects of incorrect jaw settings in cranial radiosurgery. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2018. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aaa162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
6
|
Kubicek L, Vanderhart D, Wirth K, An Q, Chang M, Farese J, Bova F, Sudhyadhom A, Kow K, Bacon NJ, Milner R. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND FRACTURES FOLLOWING STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY IN DOGS WITH APPENDICULAR OSTEOSARCOMA. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016; 57:321-30. [PMID: 26916056 DOI: 10.1111/vru.12351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Revised: 11/07/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this observational, descriptive, retrospective study was to report CT characteristics associated with fractures following stereotactic radiosurgery in canine patients with appendicular osteosarcoma. Medical records (1999 and 2012) of dogs that had a diagnosis of appendicular osteosarcoma and undergone stereotactic radiosurgery were reviewed. Dogs were included in the study if they had undergone stereotactic radiosurgery for an aggressive bone lesion with follow-up information regarding fracture status, toxicity, and date and cause of death. Computed tomography details, staging, chemotherapy, toxicity, fracture status and survival data were recorded. Overall median survival time (MST) and fracture rates of treated dogs were calculated. CT characteristics were evaluated for association with time to fracture. Forty-six dogs met inclusion criteria. The median overall survival time was 9.7 months (95% CI: 6.9-14.3 months). The fracture-free rates at 3, 6, and 9 months were 73%, 44%, and 38% (95% CI: 60-86%, 29-60%, and 22-54%), respectively. The region of bone affected was significantly associated with time to fracture. The median time to fracture was 4.2 months in dogs with subchondral bone involvement and 16.3 months in dogs without subchondral bone involvement (P-value = 0.027, log-rank test). Acute and late skin effects were present in 58% and 16% of patients, respectively. Findings demonstrated a need for improved patient selection for this procedure, which can be aided by CT-based prognostic factors to predict the likelihood of fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsay Kubicek
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611.,Angell Animal Medical Center, Jamaica Plain, MA, Boston, MA, 02130
| | - Daniel Vanderhart
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| | - Kimberly Wirth
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| | - Qi An
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| | - Myron Chang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| | - James Farese
- Pet Emergency and Specialty Center of Marin, San Rafael, CA, 94901
| | - Francis Bova
- Department of Neurosurgery, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| | - Atchar Sudhyadhom
- the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143
| | - Kelvin Kow
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| | - Nicholas J Bacon
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| | - Rowan Milner
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kubicek L, Milner R, An Q, Kow K, Chang M, Cooke K, Fox L, Farese J, Bacon N, Lurie D. OUTCOMES AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CANINE SINONASAL TUMORS TREATED WITH CURATIVE INTENT CONE-BASED STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY (1999-2013). Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016; 57:331-40. [PMID: 26880676 DOI: 10.1111/vru.12349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Revised: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a relatively new therapeutic option in veterinary oncology. The role of this modality has not been extensively evaluated for the use in canine nasal tumors. The objective of this retrospective, observational study was to describe the clinical outcome and prognostic factors associated with survival times in a sample of canine patients treated with SRS for sinonasal tumors. Fifty-seven dogs with sinonasal tumors met inclusion criteria. Histologic diagnoses included sarcoma (SA) (n = 9), carcinoma (CA) (n = 40), osteosarcoma (OSA) (n = 7), and round cell (n = 1). Four of 57 cases were treated twice with SRS. For these, the median and mean doses delivered were 30Gy and 33Gy, respectively (range 18.75Gy-56Gy). Late effects occurred in 23 cases and ranged from grades I-III. The median overall survival time was 8.5 months. The median overall survival times in dogs with tumor type of CA, SA, and OSA were 10.4, 10.7, and 3.1 months, respectively. Dogs with the tumor type of OSA had shorter overall survival time than that in dogs with tumor type of CA and SA. Findings from this retrospective study indicated that SRS may be beneficial for canine patients with sinonasal tumors, however a controlled clinical trial would be needed to confirm this. Prospective studies are also needed to better define the role of SRS as palliative or curative, and to further investigate the risk of clinically significant toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsay Kubicek
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, FL.,Angell Animal Medical Center, Jamaica Plain, MA
| | - Rowan Milner
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, FL
| | - Qi An
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, FL
| | - Kelvin Kow
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, FL
| | - Myron Chang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, FL
| | - Kristen Cooke
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, FL
| | - Leslie Fox
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, IA
| | - James Farese
- Pet Emergency and Specialty Center of Marin, San Rafael, CA
| | - Nicholas Bacon
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, FL
| | - David Lurie
- Affiliated Veterinary Specialists, Maitland, FL
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Asbell SO, Grimm J, Xue J, Chew MS, LaCouture TA. Introduction and Clinical Overview of the DVH Risk Map. Semin Radiat Oncol 2015; 26:89-96. [PMID: 27000504 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Radiation oncologists need reliable estimates of risk for various fractionation schemes for all critical anatomical structures throughout the body, in a clinically convenient format. Reliable estimation theory can become fairly complex, however, and estimates of risk continue to evolve as the literature matures. To navigate through this efficiently, a dose-volume histogram (DVH) Risk Map was created, which provides a comparison of radiation tolerance limits as a function of dose, fractionation, volume, and risk level. The graphical portion of the DVH Risk Map helps clinicians to easily visualize the trends, whereas the tabular portion provides quantitative precision for clinical implementation. The DVH Risk Map for rib tolerance from stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is used as an example in this overview; the 5% and 50% risk levels for 1-5 fractions for 5 different volumes are given. Other articles throughout this issue of Seminars in Radiation Oncology present analysis of new clinical datasets including the DVH Risk Maps for other anatomical structures throughout the body.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sucha O Asbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Holy Redeemer Hospital, Bott Cancer Center, Meadowbrook, PA.
| | - Jinyu Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ
| | | | - Tamara A LaCouture
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M. Stereotactic radiosurgery of glomus jugulare tumors: current concepts, recent advances and future perspectives. CNS Oncol 2015; 4:105-14. [PMID: 25768334 DOI: 10.2217/cns.14.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), a very highly focused form of therapeutic irradiation, has been widely recognized as a viable treatment option in the management of intracranial pathologies including benign tumors, malign tumors, vascular malformations and functional disorders. The applications of SRS are continuously expanding thanks to the ever-increasing advances and corresponding improvements in neuroimaging, radiation treatment techniques, equipment, treatment planning and delivery systems. In the context of glomus jugulare tumors (GJT), SRS is being more increasingly used both as the upfront management modality or as a complementary or salvage treatment option. As its safety and efficacy is being evident with compiling data from studies with longer follow-up durations, SRS appears to take the lead in the management of most patients with GJT. Herein, we address current concepts, recent advances and future perspectives in SRS of GJT in light of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Sager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Gn. Tevfik Saglam Cad. 06018, Etlik, Kecioren, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li S, Wang Y, Hu L, Liang Y, Cai J. The application of micro-vacuo-certo-contacting ophthalmophanto in X-ray radiosurgery for tumors in an eyeball. Tumour Biol 2014; 35:11455-60. [PMID: 25123261 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2415-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Accepted: 07/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The large errors of routine localization for eyeball tumors restricted X-ray radiosurgery application, just for the eyeball to turn around. To localize the accuracy site, the micro-vacuo-certo-contacting ophthalmophanto (MVCCOP) method was used. Also, the outcome of patients with tumors in the eyeball was evaluated. In this study, computed tomography (CT) localization accuracy was measured by repeating CT scan using MVCCOP to fix the eyeball in radiosurgery. This study evaluated the outcome of the tumors and the survival of the patients by follow-up. The results indicated that the accuracy of CT localization of Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) head ring was 0.65 mm and maximum error was 1.09 mm. The accuracy of target localization of tumors in the eyeball using MVCCOP was 0.87 mm averagely, and the maximum error was 1.19 mm. The errors of fixation of the eyeball were 0.84 mm averagely and 1.17 mm maximally. The total accuracy was 1.34 mm, and 95% confidence accuracy was 2.09 mm. The clinical application of this method in 14 tumor patients showed satisfactory results, and all of the tumors showed the clear rims. The site of ten retinoblastomas was decreased significantly. The local control interval of tumors were 6 ∼ 24 months, median of 10.5 months. The survival of ten patients was 7 ∼ 30 months, median of 16.5 months. Also, the tumors were kept stable or shrank in the other four patients with angioma and melanoma. In conclusion, the MVCCOP is suitable and dependable for X-ray radiosurgery for eyeball tumors. The tumor control and survival of patients are satisfactory, and this method can effectively postpone or avoid extirpation of eyeball.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuying Li
- Radiotherapy Department, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Improvement of the penumbra for small radiosurgical fields using flattening filter free low megavoltage beams. Z Med Phys 2013; 23:291-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2013.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2012] [Revised: 03/12/2013] [Accepted: 03/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
12
|
De Salles AA, Gorgulho AA, Pereira JL, McLaughlin N. Intracranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24:491-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
13
|
Colby GP, Coon AL, Huang J, Tamargo RJ. Historical Perspective of Treatments of Cranial Arteriovenous Malformations and Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2012; 23:15-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2011.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
14
|
Historical Development of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/174_2012_540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
15
|
Initial clinical experience with a frameless and maskless stereotactic radiosurgery treatment. Pract Radiat Oncol 2012; 2:54-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2011] [Revised: 04/18/2011] [Accepted: 04/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
16
|
Rowshanfarzad P, Sabet M, O'Connor DJ, Greer PB. Isocenter verification for linac-based stereotactic radiation therapy: review of principles and techniques. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2011; 12:3645. [PMID: 22089022 PMCID: PMC5718736 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2011] [Revised: 05/31/2011] [Accepted: 06/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
There have been several manual, semi-automatic and fully-automatic methods proposed for verification of the position of mechanical isocenter as part of comprehensive quality assurance programs required for linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) treatments. In this paper, a systematic review has been carried out to discuss the present methods for isocenter verification and compare their characteristics, to help physicists in making a decision on selection of their quality assurance routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rowshanfarzad P, Sabet M, O'Connor DJ, Greer PB. Verification of the linac isocenter for stereotactic radiosurgery using cine-EPID imaging and arc delivery. Med Phys 2011; 38:3963-70. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3597836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|
18
|
Gevaert T, Verellen D, Tournel K, Linthout N, Bral S, Engels B, Collen C, Depuydt T, Duchateau M, Reynders T, Storme G, De Ridder M. Setup accuracy of the Novalis ExacTrac 6DOF system for frameless radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 82:1627-35. [PMID: 21477937 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2010] [Revised: 12/29/2010] [Accepted: 01/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery using frame-based positioning is a well-established technique for the treatment of benign and malignant lesions. By contrast, a new trend toward frameless systems using image-guided positioning techniques is gaining mainstream acceptance. This study was designed to measure the detection and positioning accuracy of the ExacTrac/Novalis Body (ET/NB) for rotations and to compare the accuracy of the frameless with the frame-based radiosurgery technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS A program was developed in house to rotate reference computed tomography images. The angles measured by the system were compared with the known rotations. The accuracy of ET/NB was evaluated with a head phantom with seven lead beads inserted, mounted on a treatment couch equipped with a robotic tilt module, and was measured with a digital water level and portal films. Multiple hidden target tests (HTT) were performed to measure the overall accuracy of the different positioning techniques for radiosurgery (i.e., frameless and frame-based with relocatable mask or invasive ring, respectively). RESULTS The ET/NB system can detect rotational setup errors with an average accuracy of 0.09° (standard deviation [SD] 0.06°), 0.02° (SD 0.07°), and 0.06° (SD 0.14°) for longitudinal, lateral, and vertical rotations, respectively. The average positioning accuracy was 0.06° (SD 0.04°), 0.08° (SD 0.06°), and 0.08° (SD 0.07°) for longitudinal, lateral and vertical rotations, respectively. The results of the HTT showed an overall three-dimensional accuracy of 0.76 mm (SD 0.46 mm) for the frameless technique, 0.87 mm (SD 0.44 mm) for the relocatable mask, and 1.19 mm (SD 0.45 mm) for the frame-based technique. CONCLUSIONS The study showed high detection accuracy and a subdegree positioning accuracy. On the basis of phantom studies, the frameless technique showed comparable accuracy to the frame-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Gevaert
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grimm J, Grimm SYL, Das IJ, Zhu Y, Yeo I, Xue J, Simpson L, Jacob D, Sarkar A. A quality assurance method with submillimeter accuracy for stereotactic linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010; 12:3365. [PMID: 21330986 PMCID: PMC5718578 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2010] [Revised: 08/03/2010] [Accepted: 09/19/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The Stereotactic Alignment for Linear Accelerator (S. A. Linac) system is developed to conveniently improve the alignment accuracy of a conventional linac equipped with stereotactic cones. From the Winston‐Lutz test, the SAlinac system performs three‐dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the quality assurance (QA) ball coordinates with respect to the radiation isocenter, and combines this information with digital images of the laser target to determine the absolute position of the room lasers. A handheld device provides near‐real‐time repositioning advice to enable the user to align the QA ball and room lasers to within 0.25 mm of the centroid of the radiation isocenter. The results of 37 Winston‐Lutz tests over 68 days showed that the median 3D QA ball alignment error was 0.09 mm, and 97% of the time the 3D error was ≤0.25 mm. All 3D isocentric errors in the study were 0.3 mm or less. The median x and y laser alignment coordinate error was 0.09 mm, and 94% of the time the x and y laser error was ≤0.25 mm. A phantom test showed that the system can make submillimeter end‐to‐end accuracy achievable, making a conventional linac a “Submillimeter Knife”. PACS numbers: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.Qr
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Quality assurance of an image guided intracranial stereotactic positioning system for radiosurgery treatment with helical tomotherapy. J Neurooncol 2010; 98:277-85. [PMID: 20505980 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0227-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2009] [Accepted: 05/08/2010] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this work was to determine the accuracy and precision of stereotactic localization and treatment delivery using a helical tomotherapy based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. A tomotherapy specific radiosurgery workflow was designed that exploits the system's on board megavotage CT (MVCT) imaging system so that it not only provides a pre-treatment volumetric verification image that can be used for stereotactic localization, eliminating the need for a patient-frame based coordinate system, but also supplies the treatment planning image. Using an imaging guidance based intracranial stereotactic positioning system, a head ring and tabletop docking device are used only for fixation, while image guidance is used for localization. Due to the unconventional workflow, a methodology for determining the localization accuracy was developed and results were compared to other linear accelerator based radiosurgery systems. In this work, the localization error using volumetric localization was found to be 0.45 mm +/- 0.17 mm, indicating a localization precision of 0.3 mm within a 95% confidence interval. In addition, procedures for testing the delivery accuracy of the Tomotherapy system are described. Results show that the accuracy of the delivery can be verified to within +/-1 voxel dimension. These results are well within conventional SRS tolerances and compare favorably to other linear accelerator based techniques.
Collapse
|
21
|
Wiersma RD, Wen Z, Sadinski M, Farrey K, Yenice KM. Development of a frameless stereotactic radiosurgery system based on real-time 6D position monitoring and adaptive head motion compensation. Phys Med Biol 2009; 55:389-401. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
22
|
Rahman M, Murad GJA, Bova F, Friedman WA, Mocco J. Stereotactic radiosurgery and the linear accelerator: accelerating electrons in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 27:E13. [PMID: 19722815 DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.focus09116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The search for efficacious, minimally invasive neurosurgical treatment has led to the development of the operating microscope, endovascular treatment, and endoscopic surgery. One of the most minimally invasive and exciting discoveries is the use of targeted, high-dose radiation for neurosurgical disorders. Radiosurgery is truly minimally invasive, delivering therapeutic energy to an accurately defined target without an incision, and has been used to treat a wide variety of pathological conditions, including benign and malignant brain tumors, vascular lesions such as arteriovenous malformations, and pain syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia. Over the last 50 years, a tremendous amount of knowledge has been garnered, both about target volume and radiation delivery. This review covers the intense study of these concepts and the development of linear accelerators to deliver stereotactic radiosurgery. The fascinating history of stereotactic neurosurgery is reviewed, and a detailed account is given of the development of linear accelerators and their subsequent modification for radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Rahman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rajon DA, Bova FJ, Chi YY, Friedman WA. Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009; 10:260-272. [PMID: 19918219 PMCID: PMC5720585 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.2897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2008] [Revised: 05/12/2009] [Accepted: 05/12/2009] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Image‐guided surgery is currently performed using frame‐based as well as frameless approaches. In order to reduce the invasive nature of stereotactic guidance and the cost in both equipment and time required within the operating room, we investigated the use of rapid prototyping (RP) technology. In our approach, we fabricated custom patient‐specific face masks and guides that can be applied to the patient during stereotactic surgery. While the use of RP machines has previously been shown to be satisfactory from an accuracy standpoint, one of our design criteria – completing the entire build and introduction into the sterile field in less than two hours – was unobtainable.(1) Our primary problems were the fabrication time and the nonresistance of the built material to high‐temperature sterilization. In the current study, we have investigated the use of subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) machines to perform the same quality of surgical guidance, while improving the fabrication time and allowing for choosing materials suitable for sterilization. Because SRP technology does not offer the same flexibility as RP in terms of prototype shape and complexity, our software program was adapted to provide new guide designs suitable for SRP fabrication. The biopsy guide was subdivided for a more efficient build with the parts being uniquely assembled to form the final guide. The accuracy of the assembly was then assessed using a modified Brown‐Roberts‐Wells phantom base by which the position of a biopsy needle introduced into the guide can be measured and compared with the actual planned target. These tests showed that: 1) SRP machines provide an average technical accuracy of 0.77 mm with a standard deviation of the mean of 0.07 mm, and 2) SRP allows for fabrication and sterilization within three‐and‐a‐half hours after diagnostic image acquisition. We are confident that technology is capable of reducing this time to less than one hour. Further tests are being conducted to determine the registration accuracy of the face mask on the patient's head under IRB‐approved trials. The accuracy of this new guidance technology will be verified by judging it against current frame‐based or frameless systems. PACS number: 87.57.Gg
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier A Rajon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Frank J Bova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Yueh-Yun Chi
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - William A Friedman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lasak JM, Gorecki JP. The History of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009; 42:593-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2009.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
25
|
Dequesada IM, Quisling RG, Yachnis A, Friedman WA. Can standard magnetic resonance imaging reliably distinguish recurrent tumor from radiation necrosis after radiosurgery for brain metastases? A radiographic-pathological study. Neurosurgery 2008; 63:898-903; discussion 904. [PMID: 19005380 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000333263.31870.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery is a commonly used treatment method in the management of metastatic brain tumors. When lesions enlarge after radiosurgery, it may represent tumor regrowth, radiation necrosis, or both. The purpose of this study was to determine whether standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences could reliably distinguish between these pathological possibilities. METHODS A total of 619 patients, reported in a previous study, were treated with radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors. Of those patients, 59 underwent subsequent craniotomy for symptomatic lesion enlargement. Of those 59 patients, 32 had complete preoperative MRI studies as well as surgical pathology reports. The following MRI features were analyzed in this subset of patients: arteriovenous shunting, gyriform lesion or edema distribution, perilesional edema, cyst formation, and pattern of enhancement. A novel radiographic feature, called the lesion quotient, which is the ratio of the nodule as seen on T2 imaging to the total enhancing area on T1 imaging, was also analyzed. RESULTS Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were computed for each radiographic characteristic. Lesions containing only radiation necrosis never displayed gyriform lesion/edema distribution, marginal enhancement, or solid enhancement. All lesions exhibited perilesional edema. A lesion quotient of 0.6 or greater was seen in all cases of recurrent tumor, a lesion quotient greater than 0.3 was seen in 19 of 20 cases of combination pathology, and a lesion quotient of 0.3 or less was seen in 4 of 5 cases of radiation necrosis. The lesion quotient correlated with the percentage of tumor identified on pathological specimens. CONCLUSION The lesion quotient appears to reliably identify pure radiation necrosis on standard sequence MRI. Other examined radiographic features, including arteriovenous shunting, gyriform lesion/edema distribution, enhancement pattern, and cyst formation, achieved 80% or greater predictive value but had either low sensitivity or low specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan M Dequesada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Benedict SH, Bova FJ, Clark B, Goetsch SJ, Hinson WH, Leavitt DD, Schlesinger DJ, Yenice KM. The role of medical physicists in developing stereotactic radiosurgery. Med Phys 2008; 35:4262-77. [DOI: 10.1118/1.2969268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
27
|
Holmes TW, Hudes R, Dziuba S, Kazi A, Hall M, Dawson D. Stereotactic Image-Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Using the HI-ART II Helical Tomotherapy System. Med Dosim 2008; 33:135-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2007] [Accepted: 02/29/2008] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
28
|
Swinson BM, Friedman WA. LINEAR ACCELERATOR STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS. Neurosurgery 2008. [DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000313580.68865.b5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
29
|
Swinson BM, Friedman WA. LINEAR ACCELERATOR STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS. Neurosurgery 2008; 62:1018-31; discussion 1031-2. [DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325863.91584.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
30
|
Beegle RD, Friedman WA, Bova FJ. Effect of treatment plan quality on outcomes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 2007; 107:913-6. [DOI: 10.3171/jns-07/11/0913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
The goal in this study was to review the effects of treatment plan quality on outcomes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma (VS).
Methods
Between July 1988 and August 2005, 390 patients were treated. The results of this experience have been published recently. In this study the authors looked at dosimetry variables: conformity of treatment plan and steepness of dose gradient, in the same group of patients. Over the duration of this study, dosimetry evolved from a single isocenter with marginal conformity to multiple isocenters with high conformity. Multivariate statistics were used to determine the effects of these variables on tumor control and on two types of complication, facial weakness and facial numbness.
Results
The 5-year actuarial tumor control was 91%. Dosimetry had no effect on tumor control. Eighteen patients (4.6%) reported new-onset facial weakness and 14 (3.6%) reported new-onset facial numbness. Since 1994, when peripheral treatment doses were lowered to 1250 cGy, only three (1%) of 298 patients have experienced facial weakness and two (0.7%) of 298 have experienced facial numbness. Statistical analysis confirms, as in the prior study, that treatment volume and treatment dose are significant predictors of both facial weakness and facial numbness. In this model, prior tumor growth was also significant. Dosimetry, however, is definitely not a significant predictor of either complication.
Conclusions
Treatment dose appears to be much more important than treatment plan quality in the prevention of facial numbness or weakness after radiosurgery for VS.
Collapse
|
31
|
Keller BM, Beachey DJ, Pignol JP. Experimental measurement of radiological penumbra associated with intermediate energy x-rays (1MV) and small radiosurgery field sizes. Med Phys 2007; 34:3996-4002. [DOI: 10.1118/1.2775666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
32
|
Hoh DJ, Liu CY, Chen JCT, Pagnini PG, Yu C, Wang MY, Apuzzo MLJ. CHAINED LIGHTNING, PART II. Neurosurgery 2007; 61:433-46; discussion 446. [PMID: 17881954 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000290888.54578.f5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE in the radiosurgical treatment of neurological conditions is the delivery of energy to a lesion with minimal injury to surrounding structures. The development of radiosurgical techniques from Leksell's original design has focused on the refinement of various methodologies to achieve energy containment within a target. This article is the second in a series reviewing the evolution of radiosurgical instruments with respect to issues of energy beam generation and delivery for improved conformal therapy.
Continuing with concepts introduced in an earlier article, this article examines specific aspects of beam delivery and the emergence of stereotactic radiosurgery as a measure for focusing energy beams within a target volume. The application of stereotactic principles and devices to gamma ray and linear accelerator-based energy sources provides the methodology by which energy beams are generated and targeted precisely in a focal lesion. Advanced technological systems are reviewed, including fixed beams, dynamic radiosurgery, multileaf collimation, beam shaping, and robotics as various approaches for manipulating beam delivery. Radiosurgical instruments are also compared with regard to mechanics, geometry, and dosimetry. Finally, new radiosurgical designs currently on the horizon are introduced. In exploring the complex history of radiosurgery, it is evident that the discovery and rediscovery of ideas invariably leads to the development of innovative technology for the next generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Hoh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wagner TH, Meeks SL, Bova FJ, Friedman WA, Willoughby TR, Kupelian PA, Tome W. Optical Tracking Technology in Stereotactic Radiation Therapy. Med Dosim 2007; 32:111-20. [PMID: 17472890 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The last decade has seen the introduction of advanced technologies that have enabled much more precise application of therapeutic radiation. These relatively new technologies include multileaf collimators, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning, and intensity modulated radiotherapy in radiotherapy. Therapeutic dose distributions have become more conformal to volumes of disease, sometimes utilizing sharp dose gradients to deliver high doses to target volumes while sparing nearby radiosensitive structures. Thus, accurate patient positioning has become even more important, so that the treatment delivered to the patient matches the virtual treatment plan in the computer treatment planning system. Optical and image-guided radiation therapy systems offer the potential to improve the precision of patient treatment by providing a more robust fiducial system than is typically used in conventional radiotherapy. The ability to accurately position internal targets relative to the linac isocenter and to provide real-time patient tracking theoretically enables significant reductions in the amount of normal tissue irradiated. This report reviews the concepts, technology, and clinical applications of optical tracking systems currently in use for stereotactic radiation therapy. Applications of radiotherapy optical tracking technology to respiratory gating and the monitoring of implanted fiducial markers are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Wagner
- Department of Radiation Physics, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, FL 32806, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Barnett GH, Linskey ME, Adler JR, Cozzens JW, Friedman WA, Heilbrun MP, Lunsford LD, Schulder M, Sloan AE. Stereotactic radiosurgery--an organized neurosurgery-sanctioned definition. J Neurosurg 2007; 106:1-5. [PMID: 17240553 DOI: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gene H Barnett
- Taussig Cancer Center, Brain Tumor Institute, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Andrews DW, Bednarz G, Evans JJ, Downes B. A review of 3 current radiosurgery systems. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 66:559-64. [PMID: 17145309 DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2005] [Accepted: 07/21/2006] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy have become widespread techniques applied to the treatment of a variety of intracranial lesions. Rapid evolution of new technologies has now enabled clinicians to treat tumors outside the cranium and down the spinal axis. This review compares 3 commercially available systems in widespread use throughout the world. METHODS Literature review and interviews with practitioners in the United States were performed to establish data for a comparative analysis of the Gamma Knife (Elekta, Sweden), Novalis (BrainLabs, Germany), and CyberKnife systems (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA). Cost analyses were deliberately excluded because of the need for detailed cost-benefit analysis beyond the scope of the review. RESULTS An unbiased comparative analysis was not possible because of the lack of objective data from a standard metric for these systems. Despite this shortcoming, disparate features of each system were compared and contrasted. CONCLUSION A careful assessment of each system, including its operational features, capabilities, and yearly capacity must be weighed against the composition of the radiosurgery team, the case mix of the practice, and the objectives of the clinical unit to yield the best fit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Andrews
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rajon DA, Bova FJ, Bhasin RR, Friedman WA. An investigation of the potential of rapid prototyping technology for image guided surgery. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2006; 7:81-98. [PMID: 17533357 PMCID: PMC5722394 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v7i4.2302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2006] [Revised: 08/25/2006] [Accepted: 12/31/1969] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Image‐guided surgery can be broken down into two broad categories: frame‐based guidance and frameless guidance. In order to reduce both the invasive nature of stereotactic guidance and the cost in equipment and time, we have developed a new guidance technique based on rapid prototyping (RP) technology. This new system first builds a computer model of the patient anatomy and then fabricates a physical reference frame that provides a precise and unique fit to the patient anatomy. This frame incorporates a means of guiding the surgeon along a preplanned surgical trajectory. This process involves (1) obtaining a high‐resolution CT or MR scan, (2) building a computer model of the region of interest, (3) developing a surgical plan and physical guide, (4) designing a frame with a unique fit to the patient's anatomy with a physical linkage to the surgical guide, and (5) fabricating the frame using an RP unit. Software was developed to support these processes. To test the accuracy of this process, we first scanned and reproduced a plastic phantom fabricated to validate the system's ability to build an accurate virtual model. A target on the phantom was then identified, a surgical approach planned, a surgical guide designed, and the accuracy and precision of guiding a probe to that target were determined. Steps 1 through 5 were also evaluated using a head phantom. The results show that the RP technology can replicate an object from CT scans with submillimeter resolution. The fabricated reference frames, when positioned on the surface of the phantom and used to guide a surgical probe, can position the probe tip with an accuracy of 1.7 mm at the probe tip. These results demonstrate that the RP technology can be used for the fabrication of customized positioning frames for use in image‐guided surgery. PACS number: 87.57.Gg
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier A Rajon
- Neurosurgery Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Is smaller better? Comparison of 3-mm and 5-mm leaf size for stereotactic radiosurgery: A dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
38
|
Verhey LJ, Chen CC, Chapman P, Loeffler J, Curry WT. Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Targets. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2006; 17:79-97, v. [PMID: 16793501 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2006.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a technique for treating intracranial lesions with a high dose of ionizing radiation, usually in a single session, using a stereotactic apparatus for accurate localization and patient immobilization. This article describes several modalities of SRS and some of its applications, particularly for intracranial lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn J Verhey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Li S, Liu D, Yin G, Zhuang P, Geng J. Real-time 3D-surface-guided head refixation useful for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Med Phys 2006; 33:492-503. [PMID: 16532957 DOI: 10.1118/1.2150778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate and precise head refixation in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy has been achieved through alignment of real-time 3D-surface images with a reference surface image. The reference surface image is either a 3D optical surface image taken at simulation with the desired treatment position, or a CT/MRI-surface rendering in the treatment plan with corrections for patient motion during CT/MRI scans and partial volume effects. The real-time 3D surface images are rapidly captured by using a 3D video camera mounted on the ceiling of the treatment vault. Any facial expression such as mouth opening that affects surface shape and location can be avoided using a new facial monitoring technique. The image artifacts on the real-time surface can generally be removed by setting a threshold of jumps at the neighboring points while preserving detailed features of the surface of interest. Such a real-time surface image, registered in the treatment machine coordinate system, provides a reliable representation of the patient head position during the treatment. A fast automatic alignment between the real-time surface and the reference surface using a modified iterative-closest-point method leads to an efficient and robust surface-guided target refixation. Experimental and clinical results demonstrate the excellent efficacy of <2 min set-up time, the desired accuracy and precision of <1 mm in isocenter shifts, and <1 degree in rotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shidong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Richards GM, Bradley KA, Tomé WA, Bentzen SM, Resnick DK, Mehta MP. Linear Accelerator Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia. Neurosurgery 2005; 57:1193-200; discussion 1193-200. [PMID: 16331167 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000186015.01179.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To report the clinical outcomes following treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery.
METHODS:
Twenty-eight patients with medication refractory idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia were treated with a single fraction of 80 Gy to the trigeminal nerve root. For treatment delivery, a 4-mm collimator and a 7-arc technique were delivered using a stereotactic floor stand system with an isocenter stability of 0.2 ± 0.1 mm to minimize dose to the brainstem. Treatment delivery time was approximately 55 minutes.
RESULTS:
With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 1–40 mo), 57% of patients achieved complete pain relief and 75% (exact 95% confidence interval, 55 to 89%) had their pain reduced to 3 or less on a 10-point pain scale. Median time to pain relief was 1 month. Four patients did not respond to treatment. The actuarial mean time to pain recurrence in responders was 14 months, and the actuarial mean response duration in major to complete responders was 16 months. Women had significantly longer mean time to pain recurrence than men (16 versus 7 months; P = 0.05). Three patients reported new mild facial numbness after radiosurgery and one patient developed neurotrophic keratopathy.
CONCLUSION:
Linear accelerator-based radiosurgery for medication refractory trigeminal neuralgia provides effective pain relief with a low complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Richards
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/B29 Clinical Sciences Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery is a radiation technique of high radiation dose focused on a stereotactic intracranial target in a single fraction with high precision. LINAC Radiosurgery has gained increasing relevance in the treatment of brain metastases since it was introduced by Sturm (1987). METHOD AND PATIENT SELECTION: From January 1996 to August 2003 110 patients were treated with LINAC Radiosurgery. A combination of the University of Florida system and the X Knife System developed by Radionics was used in all patients. Seventy patients had a single and 40 patients multiple metastatic lesions at the time of diagnosis and treatment. Overall 161 intracerebral metastases were treated. Median tumor volume was 3.1 ccm (0.3-15 ccm). Median radiation dose to the tumor margin was 1830 cGy (range 1100-2200 cGy) prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Whole brain radiation therapy with a total dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions was performed in 35 patients because of multiple metastases and LINAC Radiosurgery was used as boost for recurrences. In 75 patients LINAC Radiosurgery was used as single treatment. RESULTS The follow-up period was between 6 and 72 months. Local tumor control rate was 89.4%. Seventeen out of 161 metastases treated showed local recurrence. Eleven out of 75 patients treated with radiosurgery as single treatment developed distant recurrence and 3 out of 35 patients who were treated with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and radiosurgery as boost. The 1-year survival rate is 54.9% with a median survival of 54 weeks. CONCLUSION LINAC Radiosurgery is an effective and safe treatment modality in patients with cerebral metastases located in any area of the brain. WBRT should be preserved for patients with multiple metastases or be delayed until multiple recurrence occurs. Surgery is still the treatment of choice in metastases with mass effect and surgical accessible location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Deinsberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Landesklinikum St. Poelten, Propst Führerstrasse 4, A-3100, St. Poelten, Austria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ulm AJ, Friedman WA, Bradshaw P, Foote KD, Bova FJ. Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Malignant Gliomas: The University of Florida Experience. Neurosurgery 2005; 57:512-7; discussion 512-7. [PMID: 16145530 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000170560.13251.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To review a single-institution's 12-year experience of treating malignant gliomas with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery.
METHODS:
One hundred patients were treated for malignant gliomas at the University of Florida between May 1, 1989, and June 12, 2002. Patient variables were entered into a radiosurgery database in a prospective manner. The endpoint of the study was length of survival from the time of diagnosis. The minimum length of follow-up was 18 months or until death. In an attempt to control for selection bias, we used the Radiation Oncology Therapy Group's (RTOG) recursive partitioning categories to compare survival in our group of radiosurgically boosted patients with the RTOG historical database.
RESULTS:
Recursive partitioning analysis classification was significantly associated with survival. Compared with historical controls, this cohort of patients demonstrated a decreased survival for recursive partitioning analysis Class I and II patients, similar survival for Class III and IV patients, and increased median survival for Class V patients. Other variables demonstrating a statistically significant impact on survival were eloquent location and recurrent disease.
CONCLUSION:
The results of this study and those of RTOG 93-05 suggest that the reported benefit of upfront radiosurgical boost for malignant gliomas is the result of selection bias. The possibility remains that radiosurgical boost is of benefit in recurrent tumors, especially those in RTOG Class V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Ulm
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Paskalev K, Feigenberg S, Wang L, Movsas B, Laske D, Ma C. A method for repositioning of stereotactic brain patients with the aid of real-time CT image guidance. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50:N201-7. [PMID: 16077217 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/16/n01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This note presents a method that recalculates the coordinates of the isocentre for patients undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy to the brain with a relocatable head frame based on a pre-treatment CT scan. The method was evaluated by comparing initial stereotactic coordinates of the isocentre with the recalculated coordinates for eight single-fraction patients. These patients had the Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) frame fixed to the outer table of the skull, and therefore the coordinates of any anatomical point should be identical between the initial scan and the pre-treatment scan. The differences between the two sets of coordinates were attributed to errors in the method. The results showed that the systematic errors in the recalculated coordinates were less than 0.05 mm, and they were not statistically significant. The random errors (one standard deviation) were from 0.35 mm (lateral) to 0.58 mm (vertical). The average value of the combined 3D difference was 0.75 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Paskalev
- Department of Radiation Oncology Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Friedman WA, Murad GJ, Bradshaw P, Amdur RJ, Mendenhall WM, Foote KD, Bova FJ. Linear accelerator surgery for meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2005; 103:206-9. [PMID: 16175847 DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.2.0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object. In this paper the authors review the results of a single-center experience in the use of linear accelerator (LINAC) surgery for radiosurgical treatment of meningiomas.
Methods. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with LINAC surgery for meningiomas between May 1989 and December 2001 was performed. All patients participated in follow-up review for a minimum of 2 years, and no patients were excluded. Two hundred ten patients were treated during the study interval.
The actuarial local control rate for benign tumors was 100% at both 1 and 2 years, and 96% at 5 years. The actuarial local control rate for atypical tumors was 100% at 1 year, 92% at 2 years, and 77% at 5 years; and that for malignant tumors was 100% at both 1 and 2 years, and only 19% at 5 years. Of the 210 patients 13 (6.2%) experienced temporary radiation-induced complications, and only five (2.3%) experienced permanent complications. In all patients with a permanent complication the histological characteristics of the meningioma were malignant.
Conclusions. Linear accelerator surgery produced high local control rates and very low rates of permanent morbidity in patients harboring benign meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Friedman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kamath R, Ryken TC, Meeks SL, Pennington EC, Ritchie J, Buatti JM. Initial clinical experience with frameless radiosurgery for patients with intracranial metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61:1467-72. [PMID: 15817352 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2003] [Revised: 08/05/2004] [Accepted: 08/16/2004] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the initial clinical experience with frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treating intracranial metastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS Sixty-four patients received frameless SRS for intracranial metastatic disease. Minimum follow-up was 6 months with none lost to follow-up. Patients had a median of 2 metastases and a maximum of 4. The median number of isocenters was 2 with median arcs of 10 and median dose of 17.5 Gy. Thirteen patients were treated for progressive/recurrent disease after surgical resection or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Fifty-one patients were treated with frameless SRS as an an adjunct to initial treatment. Of the total treated, 17 were treated with SRS alone, 20 were treated with WBRT plus SRS, 16 were treated with surgical resection plus SRS, and the remaining 11 were treated with surgical resection plus WBRT plus SRS. RESULTS With a median actuarial follow-up period of 8.2 months, ultimate local control was 88%. The median time to progression was 8.1 months. The median overall survival was 8.7 months. Of the 17 patients treated with SRS alone, 86% had ultimate local control with mean overall survival of 7.1 months. Of the 13 patients who received surgical resection plus SRS without WBRT as primary treatment, there was 85% ultimate local control with an overall survival of 10.3 months. Three patients treated with initial surgery alone had recurrence treated with SRS 2-3 months after resection. All these patients obtained local control and median survival was >10 months. Of the 13 patients who received WBRT followed by SRS as boost treatment, 92% had local control and mean overall survival was 7.3 months. Of 7 patients who received SRS after recurrence after WBRT, 100% had local control with median survival of 8.2 months. For 8 patients who received surgery followed by WBRT and SRS, local control was 50%; however, ultimate intracranial control was achieved in 7 of 8 patients with repeat SRS and surgical resection. The overall survival in this group of patients was 14.7 months. No patient had a serious (Grade 3 or higher) complication requiring intervention. CONCLUSIONS Frameless optically guided radiosurgery is less invasive, can be performed as a standard radiotherapy-based simulation procedure, and maintains submillimetric accuracy. Our initial results with frameless SRS for metastatic disease suggest survival times and local control (88%) eqiuvalent to frame-based methodologies. Practical noninvasive delivery makes treatment and potential retreatment to avoid WBRT more feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Kamath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper will review the recent publications of stereotactic radiosurgery for brain tumors. RECENT ADVANCES Despite its controversial beginning, stereotactic radiosurgery has rapidly gained acceptance among neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologists as a valuable treatment option for patients with certain benign and malignant brain tumors. Over the past year, a number of publications have confirmed the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality as the sole treatment modality or as part of the multimodality management of brain tumor patients. These publications ranged from the first multi-institutional phase III trial of radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases to numerous retrospective papers about treatment outcomes. Also, a number of these publications have explored the use of newer imaging modalities to improve treatment outcomes while others reported on the rare complication of radiation-associated second tumors. SUMMARY Recent publications of stereotactic radiosurgery have increased our understanding of the use of this technology. Future studies are needed to further improve outcomes, minimize toxicities and increase our understanding of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brain Tumor Institute, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Deinsberger R, Tidstrand J. Linac radiosurgery as a tool in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev 2005; 28:79-88; discussion 89-90, 91. [PMID: 15726439 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-005-0376-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2004] [Revised: 10/31/2004] [Accepted: 11/15/2004] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery is a radiation technique that uses a high radiation dose focused on a stereotactic defined intracranial target in single fraction with high precision. In the 1980s, linear accelerators were introduced as a tool for radiosurgery beneath the already accepted gamma unit. Technique and mechanical precision of LINACs have become equal to the gamma unit and LINAC radiosurgery became more and more used recently. From January 1996 to August 2003 we have treated 237 patients with LINAC radiosurgery. A combination of the University of Florida system and the X Knife System, developed by Radionics, was used in all patients. A number of 110 patients had 161 brain metastases treated, whereas the local tumor control rate was 89.4%. The 1-year survival rate was 54.9% with a median survival of 54 weeks. In 55 patients we have treated 57 meningiomas, mostly located at the skull base (37 out of 55 patients). Local tumor control rate in our patients with skull base meningiomas at 5-year follow up was 97.2%. In this time period, we have also treated acoustic schwannoma, glioma, pituitary adenoma, arteriovenous malformations and patients with trigeminal neuralgia. LINAC radiosurgery has become a daily tool in neurosurgery and changed treatment strategies especially in the treatment of brain metastases and skull base meningiomas towards a less aggressive and multimodality approach. It is not only an alternative to open surgery, but also a very effective adjuvant treatment modality in many neuro-oncological patients, which helps us to enhance tumor control rate, minimize morbidity and increase postoperative quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Deinsberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klagenfurt General Hospital, Austria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Farese JP, Milner R, Thompson MS, Lester N, Cooke K, Fox L, Hester J, Bova FJ. Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of osteosarcomas involving the distal portions of the limbs in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 225:1567-72, 1548. [PMID: 15568390 DOI: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.1567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves precise delivery of a single large dose of radiation to a designated tumor target. This report describes use of SRS in combination with a frameless stereotactic localization system to treat 11 dogs with appendicular osteosarcomas. Five dogs were treated with SRS alone; 6 were treated with a combination of SRS and chemotherapy. Overall median survival time was 363 days (range, 145 to 763 days), with 6 dogs still alive 90, 142, 234, 367, 633, and 763 days after SRS. Limb function was good or excellent in all 6 dogs that were still alive. Results in these dogs suggest that SRS may be a viable option for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma, with the potential to provide long-term local tumor control and improvement in limb function, especially when combined with chemotherapy. Because of the destructive nature of osteosarcoma and limitations of SRS, dogs with tumors that are small and have caused minimal bone destruction would likely be the best candidates for this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Farese
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0126, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ulm AJ, Friedman WA, Bova FJ, Bradshaw P, Amdur RJ, Mendenhall WM. Linear Accelerator Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2004; 55:1076-85. [PMID: 15509314 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000141084.28973.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2003] [Accepted: 05/28/2004] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To review a 12-year experience treating metastatic brain disease with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).
METHODS:
We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated between 1989 and 2001 with linear accelerator radiosurgery for brain metastases. Patients were followed up both clinically and with imaging studies to document local control, regional control, and survival. Demographic data, dosing parameters, number of lesions, histology, history of whole-brain radiation therapy, and other factors were obtained prospectively. Cox proportional-hazards regression with multivariate and univariate analysis was performed with Stata 8.0 software.
RESULTS:
A total of 383 patients received SRS for brain metastases during the study interval. Median survival was 9 months. Patients with tumor-type melanoma or multiple metastatic lesions had decreased survival. Actuarial 1-year local control was 75%. Differences in regional control rates were not statistically significant between patients treated with SRS and whole-brain radiation therapy versus SRS alone.
CONCLUSION:
Radiosurgery is an effective and safe method for treating selected patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Ulm
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Loeffler JS, Friedman WA. Radiosurgery and radiotherapy: observations and clarifications. J Neurosurg 2004; 101:585-9. [PMID: 15481710 DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.4.0585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object. Radiosurgery and radiation therapy represent important but unique treatment paradigms for patients with certain neoplasms, vascular lesions, or functional disorders. The authors discuss their differences.
Methods. Reviewing the authors' experiences shows how the roles of these approaches vary just as their techniques differ. The distinct differences include the method of target localization (intraoperative compared with pretreatment) and irradiation (focused compared with wide-field), their radiobiology (effects of a single high-dose compared with multiple fractions), the physicians and other health personnel involved in the conduct of these procedures (surgical team compared with radiation team), and the expectations that follow treatment. During the last decade, considerable confusion has grown regarding nomenclature, requisite physician training, and the roles of the physician and surgeon. Ten years ago, two task forces on radiosurgery were created by national organizations in neurosurgery and radiation oncology to address these issues of procedural conduct and quality-assurance requirements. At the present time these guidelines are widely ignored. Currently, many patients, payers, and regulatory agencies are bewildered. What are the differences among stereotactic radiosurgery, fractionated radiation therapy, and stereotactic radiation therapy? Radiosurgery is to radiation therapy as microsurgery is to “microtherapy.”
Conclusions. In this report the authors discuss terminology, training, and physician roles in this expanding field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Kondziolka
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|