Aggressive multimodality treatment for cervical cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastases

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women worldwide. The outcome of patients with metastatic cervical cancer is poor. We reviewed the relevant literature concerning the treatment and diagnosis of metastatic cervical cancer. There are two types of metastasis related to different treatments and survival rates: hematogenous metastasis and lymphatic metastasis. Patients with hematogenous metastasis have a higher risk of death than those with lymphatic metastasis. In terms of diagnosis, fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and PET-computed tomography are effective tools for the evaluation of distant metastasis. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy and subsequent chemotherapy are well-tolerated and efficient for lymphatic metastasis. As for lung metastasis, chemotherapy and/or surgery are valuable treatments for resistant, recurrent metastatic cervical cancer and chemoradiotherapy may be the optimal choice for stage IVB cervical cancer. Chemotherapy and bone irradiation are promising for bone metastasis. A better survival is achieved with multimodal therapy. Craniotomy or stereotactic radiosurgery is an optimal choice combined with radiotherapy for solitary brain metastases. Chemotherapy and palliative brain radiation may be considered for multiple brain metastases and other organ metastases.

Para-aortic nodal metastases in cervical cancer: a blind spot in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system: current diagnosis and management

In cervical cancer, para-aortic nodal (PALN) metastases at presentation is a strong indicator of poor prognosis. Despite this, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system does not require evaluation of lymph node involvement and does not incorporate clinically detected PALN into the staging system. In the USA, despite screening, a significant number of women still present at an advanced stage often with nodal metastases. While the presence of PALN metastases often indicates occult systemic disease, it is possible with modern therapies to provide long-term control of disease in a percentage of patients. We review the epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of PALN metastases in cervical cancer outlining advances in modern imaging and combined modality therapies (surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy).

Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET

Chemoradiation therapy is deemed the standard treatment by many North American and European teams for treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The prevalence of para-aortic nodal metastasis in these tumours is 10-25%. PET (with or without CT) is the most accurate imaging modality to assess extrapelvic disease in such tumours. The true-positive rate of PET is high, suggesting that surgical staging is not necessary if uptake takes place in the para-aortic region. Nevertheless, false-negative results (in the para-aortic region) have been recorded in 12% of patients, rising to 22% in those with uptake during PET of the pelvic nodes. In such situations, laparoscopic surgical para-aortic staging still has an important role for detection of patients with occult para-aortic spread misdiagnosed on PET or PET-CT, allowing optimisation of treatment (extension of radiation therapy fields to include the para-aortic area). Complications of the laparoscopic procedure were noted in 0-7% of patients. Survival of individuals (missed by PET) with para-aortic nodal metastasis of 5 mm or less (and managed by extended field chemoradiation therapy) seems to be similar to survival of those without para-aortic spread, suggesting a positive therapeutic effect of the addition of staging surgery. Nevertheless, the effect on survival of potential delay of chemoradiation owing to use of PET and staging surgery, and acute and late complications of surgery followed by chemoradiation therapy (particularly in case of extended field chemoradiation to para-aortic area), need to be studied.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in uterine cervical cancer patients treated with postoperative extended field radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in uterine cervical cancer patients treated with postoperative extended field radiation therapy (POEFRT) with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1983 and 2006, 35 patients with a pathologically confirmed positive para-aortic node (PAN) or common iliac node (CIN) who underwent a radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and PAN dissection received POEFRT with (N=23) or without (N=12) chemotherapy. Prognostic factors such as age, stage, size, parametrium invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, nodal station, depth of stromal invasion and use of chemotherapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 44 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant failure-free survival (DFFS) and loco-regional failure-free survival rates were 51%, 51%, 59% and 93%, respectively. The use of chemotherapy significantly improved the 5-year OS rate (61% vs. 48%, p=0.004), the 5-year DFS rate (54% vs. 38%, p=0.004) and the 5-year DFFS rate (57% vs. 48%, p=0.009). PAN involvement resulted in a compromised 5-year DFS rate (42% vs. 73%, p=0.002) and 5-year DFFS rate (47% vs. 82%, p=0.004) as compared to CIN involvement. Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicity was observed more frequently in patients who received POEFRT combined with chemotherapy as compared to patients who received POEFRT alone (52% vs. 17%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

The use of POEFRT resulted in an excellent loco-regional control rate. The addition of chemotherapy may improve outcome in patients who have received POEFRT, but with higher manageable toxicity.

Extended-Field Irradiation and Intracavitary Brachytherapy Combined With Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer With Positive Para-Aortic or High Common Iliac Lymph Nodes: Results of ARM 1 of RTOG 0116

PURPOSE

The Radiation Therapy Oncolology Group (RTOG) 0116 trial was designed to test the ability of Amifostine to reduce the toxicity of combined chemotherapy with extended-field radiotherapy and brachytherapy (Part 2), after first determining the toxicity rate for the regimen without Amifostine (Part 1). This manuscript reports the results of Part 1.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligibility included patients with cervical carcinoma and high common iliac or para-aortic metastasis. Patients received extended-field radiotherapy to 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) with intracavitary irradiation. The final point A dose was 85 Gy LDR equivalent. Use of HDR was allowed. The positive para-aortic and high common iliac nodes were boosted to 54 to 59.4 Gy. Cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) was delivered weekly during external beam and once with brachytherapy. The primary endpoint of Part 1 was acute Grade 3/4 toxicity, excluding Grade 3 leukopenia.

RESULTS

A total of 26 eligible patients were entered between August 1, 2000, and December 3, 2003. Of these, 21 had para-aortic metastasis (15 also had high common iliac involvement), and 5 had high common iliac involvement only. The median follow-up was 17.1 months (range, 1.8-38.6 months) for all patients and 21.7 months (range, 11.4-38.6 months) for alive patients. The acute Grade 3/4 toxicity rate, excluding Grade 3 leukopenia was 81%. Late Grade 3/4 toxicity was 40%. Eight patients underwent surgery for complications. Sixteen (62%) patients had a complete response for both local and nodal disease. The complete local response was 92%, the complete overall nodal response rate was 62% and the regional and para-aortic nodal response rates were 60% and 71% respectively. Estimated disease-free and overall survival at 18 months are 46% and 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended field and intracavitary irradiation with cisplatin for para-aortic or high common iliac metastasis from cervical cancer is associated with significant acute and late toxicity.

Concomitant chemobrachyradiotherapy with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by consolidation chemotherapy for women with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix--final results of a prospective phase II-study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ifosfamide and cisplatin administered concomitantly with low-dose rate brachyradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (LASCC) or adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with primary uterine cervical cancer were enrolled between August 1999 and November 2004. The patients had to have FIGO-stage IB2 bulky to IVA disease, biopsy-proven squamous cell or adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The patients were to receive external radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions); ifosfamide 2 g/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 was applied concomitantly during two low-dose rate brachyradiotherapy applications; the planned dose to point A was 85 Gy in total. After the completion of radiotherapy, i.e. external and concomitant chemobrachyradiotherapy, four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with the same drug combination were to be administered.

RESULTS

The clinical complete response rate according to WHO-classification (assessed after the completion of the whole treatment procedures by gynecologic and radiologic evaluation and cervical biopsy) was 100%. After a median follow-up of 49 months (range 11-74 months), the recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 88.7%, respectively. The most frequent early toxicities were grade 3 and 4 leukopenias occurring in 25% and 11% of the cycles, respectively. Major delayed local complications occurred in 10 patients (16.1%).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that concomitant chemobrachyradiotherapy with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by consolidation chemotherapy with the same drug combination is a highly efficacious and very promising treatment protocol for patients with locally advanced LASCC or adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy as the standard of care for cervical cancer

From 1999-2000, each of five randomized trials demonstrated improved rates of survival and local control when concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy was added to radiation therapy in patients with loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer. These studies demonstrated that addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy improved the outcome of patients treated with radiation therapy and hysterectomy or radiation therapy alone. Although concurrent chemotherapy increases the severity of acute side effects, it does not appear to increase the risk of late side effects of radiation therapy. A sixth randomized trial, published in 2002, failed to demonstrate improved outcome with concurrent weekly cisplatin over radiation therapy alone; however, the earlier trials demonstrated benefit with this chemoradiation regimen. In addition, three of the earlier randomized trials demonstrated improved outcome with combinations of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil compared with radiation therapy alone. Although cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the most accepted standard, individual trials have suggested that other drugs, including mitomycin and epirubicin, might be beneficial. Randomized trials that investigated the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiation therapy have failed to demonstrate a benefit of this approach. Although the evidence for benefit of concurrent chemotherapy is strong for otherwise healthy patients with newly diagnosed, loco-regionally advanced cervical cancers confined to the pelvis, the relative benefits and risks are not well understood for patients who are infirm or who require larger fields of radiation therapy. In such patients, the theoretical benefits and potential risks should be considered carefully before a treatment plan is prescribed.

The role of amifostine in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: An update of RTOG-0116 and review of future directions

Approximately 10,520 women will be diagnosed with carcinoma of the uterine cervix in 2004, resulting in significant mortality. While definitive or adjuvant radiation therapy remains a critical component of treatment, both local and distant recurrences may occur. The recent addition of chemotherapy has helped reduce these recurrences and improve survival, albeit at a cost of increased toxicity, especially in patients requiring extended-field treatment. New agents, such as amifostine (Ethyol, MedImmune Inc, Gaithersburg, MD), that possess cytoprotective and radioprotective properties may help ameliorate toxicity. This report reviews and updates the rationale and current experience with amifostine in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Data suggest a benefit in patients with pelvic malignancies receiving amifostine before either chemotherapy or radiation, and that subcutaneous administration may be as efficacious and less toxic than the intravenous route. Ongoing trials will likely provide more data to the role of amifostine in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix, and especially whether the administration of subcutaneous amifostine before both chemotherapy/radiation therapy will translate into a reduction in acute and late toxicity.

Cytoprotection/radioprotection with amifostine: potential role in cervical cancer and early findings in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group C-0116 trial

Concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation therapy is now considered the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Available data also suggest that combined-modality therapy improves outcome compared with radiation therapy alone in disease with positive para-aortic lymph nodes. However, radiation therapy alone is associated with significant toxicity in cervical cancer, and toxicity is increased with chemoradiation therapy. The cytoprotectant/radioprotectant agent amifostine (Ethyol; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) has been found to reduce toxicities associated with cisplatin, radiation, and combined modality approaches in the treatment of several tumor types. The limited available data on the use of amifostine in patients with cervical or pelvic cancers indicate a benefit in reducing chemoradiation toxicity, although cisplatin regimens used in the early investigations in cervical cancer are no longer considered optimal. In the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group C-0116 phase I/II trial, patients with cervical cancer with positive para-aortic or high common iliac nodes are to receive extended-field radiation and intracavitary brachytherapy plus weekly cisplatin in the first part of the study; in the second part of the trial, patients are also to receive amifostine. The trial should provide important information on the potential for adjunctive amifostine use in chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer.

Clinical evaluation of dynamic arc conformal radiotherapy for paraaortic lymph node metastasis

PURPOSE

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dynamic arc conformal radiotherapy, a simple intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), for the treatment of paraaortic lymph node metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with paraaortic lymph node metastases were enrolled in this study. The total planned dose was 55-60 Gy. A computed tomography (CT) simulator was used in the treatment planning.

RESULTS

The total radiation dose delivered was 50-63.4 Gy (median 60 Gy). Sixteen of 29 patients showed local tumor shrinkage on CT, and the 2 year in-field recurrence free survival rate was 58%. Acute Grade 1 and Grade 2 gastrointestinal disorders occurred in 31% and 17%, respectively, and acute Grade 2 liver dysfunction occurred in 7%. As a late complication, Grade 1 and Grade 2 liver dysfunction occurred in six patients (21%) and five patients (17%), respectively. There was no renal dysfunction or myelopathy detected.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic arc conformal radiotherapy, a simple IMRT, is a safe and effective treatment method for paraaortic lymph node metastasis.

The potential role of amifostine in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a review

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix affects approximately 13,000 women annually in the United States. Radiotherapy is a commonly applied therapy, either as definitive treatment or combined with surgery. Although highly effective, radiotherapy can be associated with significant complications. Amifostine has been shown to be an effective radioprotector in head and neck malignancies. Preliminary evidence suggests a role in cervical cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy: the new standard care for invasive cervical cancer

Cervical cancer remains a major health problem worldwide, despite advances in screening. For patients with locally advanced stage disease, failure to obtain local-regional control usually results in death. In an effort to improve local-regional tumour control, neoadjuvant and concurrent chemoradiation have been tested. Recently, 5 randomised trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the Southwest Oncology Group studying cisplatin-based chemoradiation have demonstrated a significant survival advantage. Three of the trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation alone and 2 trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation with hydroxyurea. In all trials, cisplatin-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiation therapy was the more effective therapy, reducing the risk of death by 30 to 50%. Acute toxicities, principally neutropenia and gastrointestinal, were more common with chemoradiation but were transient and rates of late complications were similar between treatment groups. Based on the results of these 5 randomised trials, the National Cancer Institute released a Clinical Announcement stating that cisplatin-based chemotherapy as used in these trials concurrently with radiation therapy should be the new standard of therapy for high risk early stage and locally advanced stage cervical cancer.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy in primary cancer of the cervix

Radiation therapy has been the most active agent for the treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer for many years. Chemotherapy has shown some activity, but data has been lacking to support its routine use. Recently, data from five prospective, randomized trials evaluating this difficult population have matured. Reports from these trials are startlingly similar, leading to the common conclusion that concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy and radiation therapy substantially decrease the risk of relapse and increase the overall survival. These results are compelling evidence for the inclusion of cisplatin with irradiation as a new standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

In 1986, a protocol comparing primary radiation therapy (RT) plus hydroxyurea (HU) to irradiation plus fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CF) was activated by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. The goals were to determine the superior chemoradiation regimen and to quantitate the relative toxicities.

METHODS

All patients had biopsy-proven invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Patients underwent standard clinical staging studies and their tumors were found to be International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stages IIB, III, or IVA. Negative cytologic washings and para-aortic lymph nodes were required for entry. Patients were randomized to receive either standard whole pelvic RT with concurrent 5-FU infusion and bolus CF or the same RT plus oral HU.

RESULTS

Of 388 randomized patients, 368 were eligible; 177 were randomized to CF and 191 to HU. Adverse effects were predominantly hematologic or gastrointestinal in both regimens. Severe or life-threatening leukopenia was more common in the HU group (24%) than in the CF group (4%). The difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically significant in favor of the CF group (P = .033). The sites of progression in the two treatment groups were not substantially different. Survival was significantly better for the patients randomized to CF (P = .018).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix, the combination of 5-FU and CF with RT offers patients better PFS and overall survival than HU, and with manageable toxicity.

Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Bulky stage IB cervical cancers have a poorer prognosis than smaller stage I cervical cancers. For the Gynecologic Oncology Group, we conducted a trial to determine whether weekly infusions of cisplatin during radiotherapy improve progression-free and overall survival among patients with bulky stage IB cervical cancer.

METHODS

Women with bulky stage IB cervical cancers (tumor, > or =4 cm in diameter) were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone or in combination with cisplatin (40 mg per square meter of body-surface area once a week for up to six doses; maximal weekly dose, 70 mg), followed in all patients by adjuvant hysterectomy. Women with evidence of lymphadenopathy on computed tomographic scanning or lymphangiography were ineligible unless histologic analysis showed that there was no lymph-node involvement. The cumulative dose of external pelvic and intracavitary radiation was 75 Gy to point A (cervical parametrium) and 55 Gy to point B (pelvic wall). Cisplatin was given during external radiotherapy, and adjuvant hysterectomy was performed three to six weeks later.

RESULTS

The relative risks of progression of disease and death among the 183 women assigned to receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin, as compared with the 186 women assigned to receive radiotherapy alone, were 0.51 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.75) and 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.86), respectively. The rates of both progression-free survival (P<0.001) and overall survival (P=0.008) were significantly higher in the combined-therapy group at four years. In the combined-therapy group there were higher frequencies of transient grade 3 (moderate) and grade 4 (severe) adverse hematologic effects (21 percent, vs. 2 percent in the radiotherapy group) and adverse gastrointestinal effects (14 percent vs. 5 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding weekly infusions of cisplatin to pelvic radiotherapy followed by hysterectomy significantly reduced the risk of disease recurrence and death in women with bulky stage IB cervical cancers.

Phase I trial of concomitant chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer and other advanced pelvic malignancies

Purpose. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and toxicity of concomitant hydroxyurea (HU) and escalating doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in locally advanced cervical cancer and other pelvic malignancies undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Methods. Treatment consisted of 5-FU, HU, and pelvic RT delivered in an alternate-week fashion. 5-FU was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion at a starting dose of 600 mg/m2/day and was escalated to 1000 mg/m2/day in cohorts of three patients. The HU dose was 500 mg twice daily. Chemoradiotherapy was administered on a 5-day cycle. Following a 9-day rest, the cycle was repeated until the completion of the pelvic RT. Results. Twenty-one patients (18 cervix, 1 bladder, 1 vagina, 1 ovary) were enrolled. 5-FU escalation to 1000 mg/m2/day was well tolerated. No patients developed grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity. Grade 2 leukopenia was noted in 3 patients (14.3%). Grade 3 mucositis, diarrhea, and dermatitis occurred in 10, 10, and 5% of patients, respectively. None of the 99 treatment cycles were delayed secondary to acute toxicity. The overall response rate in the 18 cervical cancer patients was 89% (78% complete, 11% partial). Conclusions. Concomitant continuous infusion 5-FU, twice daily HU, and pelvic RT delivered in an alternate-week fashion is well tolerated. Further study is necessary to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of this regimen in patients with advanced cervical and other pelvic malignancies.

Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

A multicenter trial of chemoradiation therapy to evaluate the feasibility of extended field radiation therapy (ERT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin, and to determine the progression-free interval (PFI), overall survival (OS), and recurrence sites in patients with biopsy-confirmed para-aortic node metastases (PAN) from cervical carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-five patients with cervical carcinoma and PAN metastases were entered and 86 were evaluable: Stage I--14, Stage II--40, Stage III--27, Stage IVA--5. Seventy-nine percent of the patients were followed for 5 or more years or died. ERT doses were 4500 cGy (PAN), 3960 cGy to the pelvis (Stages IB/IIB), and 4860 cGy to the pelvis (Stages IIIB/IVA). Point A intracavitary (IC) doses were 4000 cGy (Stages IB/IIB), and 3000 cGy (Stages IIIB/IVA). Point B doses were raised to 6000 cGy (ERT + IC) with parametrial boost. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day for 96 hours and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1 and 5.

RESULTS

Eighty-five of 86 patients completed radiation therapy and 90% of patients completed both courses of chemotherapy. Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) grade 3-4 acute toxicity were gastrointestinal (18.6%) and hematologic (15.1%). Late morbidity actuarial risk of 14% at 4 years primarily involved the rectum. Initial sites of recurrence were pelvis alone, 20.9%; distant metastases only, 31.4%; and pelvic plus distant metastases, 10.5%. The 3-year OS and PFI rate were 39% and 34%, respectively, for the entire group. OS was Stage I--50%, Stage II--39%, and Stage III/IVA--38%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended field radiation therapy with 5-FU and cisplatin chemotherapy was feasible in a multicenter clinical trial. PFI of 33% at 3 years suggests that a proportion of patients achieve control of advanced pelvic disease and that not all patients with PAN metastases have systemic disease. This points to the importance of assessment and treatment of PAN metastases.

Cervical cancer with paraaortic metastases: significance of residual paraaortic disease after surgical staging

Cervical carcinoma frequently metastasizes to the paraaortic region, necessitating extended field radiotherapy to effect a cure. As imaging modalities are unreliable in identifying all cases of paraaortic nodal metastases (PAN), surgical staging is often utilized prior to radiotherapy. This study was aimed at identifying factors predictive of survival in women with cervical carcinoma and paraaortic metastases. In particular, survival based on extent of paraaortic disease was examined. The study group consisted of 43 women (stages IB-IVB) identified between 1982 and 1993 who were treated with extended field radiation for cervical carcinoma with histologically confirmed paraaortic metastases. The estimated 5-year survival for the study population was 24% with a median survival of 18 months. Pelvic tumor size had a significant impact on survival with the median survival being 34 months if the primary lesion was < 6 cm compared to 14 months if > or = 6 cm (P = 0.01). Eight of the 26 (31%) women without residual PAN disease after surgical staging remain alive and disease free (mean follow-up, 74 months). In contrast, only 1 of the 17 (6%) women with gross residual PAN is alive 71 months after treatment (P = 0.05). However, a comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves did not show a statistically significant advantage to the surgical excision of grossly involved PAN (P = 0.98). Although long-term survival among women with grossly involved, unresected paraaortic metastases is uncommon, further study is necessary to elucidate the role of surgical excision of bulky aortic disease in women with cervical cancer.

Extended field radiation and cisplatin for stage IIB and IIIB cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate local regional control, survival, and morbidity in patients with FIGO IIB and IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated with primary extended field (prophylactic paraaoratic radiation) radiation and weekly cisplatin.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients (44 IIB and 23 IIIB) with carcinoma of the cervix received cisplatin at 1 mg/kg (up to 60 mg) weekly and extended field radiation therapy including the paraaortic nodes and brachytherapy.

RESULTS

After the scheduled therapy 94.1% of the patients were complete responders. Seventy-five percent are alive without evidence of disease with a mean follow-up of 47.5 months.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the ability to give concomitant weekly cisplatin and prophylactic paraaortic radiation with minimal morbidity. The encouraging Kaplan-Meier survival of 75% and only eight pelvic failures warrants further investigation.

Hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil infusion, and cisplatin adjunct to radiation therapy in cervical carcinoma: a phase I-II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) compared hydroxyurea (HDXR) and the combination of cisplatin (C) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion as potentiators of radiation therapy. This study was undertaken to determine whether these two regimens could be combined, concurrent with pelvic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

The GOG entered 75 eligible and evaluable patients on a Phase I-II evaluation of HDXR, C, and 5-FU as adjuncts to radiation therapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. All patients had histologically verified primary disease and confirmed negative para-aortic lymph nodes. Eligibility was limited to clinical stage IIB through IVA. HDXR was given orally, twice weekly at a dose of 2.5 g/m2; C on Days 1 and 29 at 50 mg/m2; and 5-FU by 96-hr infusion on Days 2-5 and 30-33 at a starting dose of 800 mg/m2.

RESULTS

Forty-eight (64%) patients had stage IIB disease, 25 (33%) had stage IIIB, and 2 had stage IVA tumors. Primary tumors 4 cm or less in size were present in 15 patients, between 4 and 6 cm were in 27 patients, and larger than 6-cm were observed in 33 patients. Grade 3/4 acute toxicity was experienced by 41 (54.7%) patients. These acute toxicities caused delays in prescribed radiation therapy of more than 1 week in 14 (18.9%) and low doses of drug in 16 (21.3%), and only 26 (34.7%) patients had the scheduled dose escalation of 5-FU on their second course. Clinical response was excellent with complete and partial response rate of 93.3%. Median time to progression has not been reached.

CONCLUSION

Although this dose and schedule could be successfully administered, the delays in therapy should be avoided by a lower starting dose of hydroxyurea. Stomatitis was not a dose-limiting toxicity. These results have formed the basis of a phase III trial comparing this regimen to two other chemoradiation regimens.

Laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node sampling in the staging of invasive cervical carcinoma: including a comparative study of 21 laparotomy cases

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and risks of laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node sampling compared with standard laparotomy in staging cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

From August 1993 through July 1994, 38 patients with biopsy-proven invasive cervical carcinoma (24 early and 14 advanced invasive cancers) were entered into the study. This was a prospective study of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in invasive cervical carcinoma, with patients serving as their own controls. Video laparoscopic lymph node sampling was performed. In patients with early invasive cancer, the nodes were sent for frozen section and, if negative, laparotomy was performed to look for any residual nodes. Radical hysterectomy was performed immediately if residual nodes were negative. Patients with either nodal metastasis on frozen section or with advanced cancer underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy only. The operative technique was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Laparoscopy required an average of 77 min (S.D. 40), with an average blood loss of 116 ml (S.D. 321). The average number of nodes was 15 (S.D. 7). At subsequent laparotomy the average number of residual nodes found was 0.4 (S.D. 0.9) and none showed metastasis. One vena cava laceration and one ureteral injury required immediate repair, and two patients were too obese to undergo laparoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node sampling is a less invasive, reliable method for staging invasive cervical carcinoma and can substitute for traditional open procedures. The incidence of risks with this method appears to be low.

Weekly cisplatin plus external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix

PURPOSE

Prospective, single arm, Phase I/II trial performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the concomitant use of weekly cisplatin and pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 1988 and April 1991, 50 previously untreated patients with bulky, locally advanced, squamous cell carcinoma entered the study. All patients were evaluated by a gynecologist and a radiation oncologist and were submitted to standard pre-treatment staging procedures. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution was as follows: IIA three patients, IIB seventeen, IIIA two, IIIB 25, and IVA three. Radiotherapy consisted of 46 Gy external beam irradiation plus three high dose rate intracavitary treatments given on a weekly basis to a total dose of 30 Gy to point A. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 was also given weekly starting on day 1 of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 27 months, complete response was seen in 88% (44/50) of the patients. The actuarial survival rate at 44 months was 65%. Total pelvic failure rate was 26% (13/50). Of the 44 patients who achieved a complete remission, only seven have failed in the pelvis. Distant disease was observed in 24% of the cases. Treatments were well tolerated with no patient requiring an interruption in the radiotherapy. However, the incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity was high, with 10 patients developing a rectal ulcer (four colostomies for severe bleeding), two patients a small bowel obstruction, and two patients a recto-vaginal fistula. Moreover, gastrointestinal complications appeared sooner than expected, at a median follow-up time of 11 months after completion of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The combination of weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy appears to be a very effective regimen for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix, but resulted in a relatively high frequency of late gastrointestinal complications.

Weekly cisplatin and radical radiation therapy for advanced, recurrent, and poor prognosis cervical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A Phase I-II trial of cisplatin and radical radiation therapy was initiated for advanced, recurrent, and poor prognosis carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

METHODS

From September 1983 to October 1991, 55 patients were entered on the protocol. Forty patients had advanced cervical carcinoma International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stages IIB-IVB, 4 patients were treated for recurrent disease, and 11 patients had FIGO Stage I disease with poor prognostic factors. Cisplatin was administered weekly on an outpatient basis at a dose of 1 mg/kg (maximum, 60 mg) during teletherapy. The radiation fields included the pelvis only in 20 patients, the pelvis and paraaortic fields in 33 patients, and the paraaortic fields alone in 2 patients. The total number of cycles of cisplatin received ranged from 3-6 (mean 5.2). There were no interruptions in the planned radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Neutropenia occurred in 18 of 55 patients (32.7%) with only 1 (1.8%) having Grade IV toxicity. Mild thrombocytopenia occurred in only one patient. No significant gastrointestinal, neurologic, or renal toxicity was observed. Of the 48 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, all had a complete response within the radiation field. The follow-up has ranged from 1-85+ months. Currently, there have been 19 (34.5%) recurrences, only 2 (3.7%) of which have occurred in the radiation field.

CONCLUSIONS

The weekly cisplatin chemotherapy administered during radiation therapy was well tolerated in this high-risk group of patients and did not diminish the ability to give standard doses of radiation.