Synchronous radiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy for locally advanced or recurrent squamous cancer of the vulva

Recommendations for the treatment of vulvar cancer in settings with limited resources: Report from the International Gynecological Cancer Society consensus meeting

Introduction

Due to scant literature and the absence of high-level evidence, the treatment of vulvar cancer is even more challenging in countries facing limited resources, where direct application of international guidelines is difficult. Recommendations from a panel of experts convened to address some of these challenges were developed.

Methods

The panel met in Rio de Janeiro in September 2019 during the International Gynecological Cancer Society congress and was composed of specialists from countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. The panel addressed 62 questions and provided recommendations for the management of early, locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic vulvar cancer. Consensus was defined as at least 75% of the voting members selecting a particular recommendation, whereas a majority vote was considered when one option garnered between 50.0% and 74.9% of votes. Resource limitation was defined as any issues limiting access to qualified surgeons, contemporary imaging or radiation-oncology techniques, antineoplastic drugs, or funding for the provision of contemporary medical care.

Results

Consensus was reached for nine of 62 (14.5%) questions presented to the panel, whereas a majority vote was reached for 29 (46.7%) additional questions. For the remaining questions, there was considerable heterogeneity in the recommendations.

Conclusion

The development of guidelines focusing on areas of the world facing more severe resource limitations may improve medical practice and patient care.

Role of Chemotherapy in Vulvar Cancers: Time to Rethink Standard of Care?

Simple Summary

Vulvar cancer is a difficult clinical condition to treat. Although it is not one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers, its incidence is not negligible. Treatment depends on the extent of the disease and is currently based on surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The combination of these possible treatments, in the context of multidisciplinary discussions, is crucial. In this paper we present a review of the data available in the literature on the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of vulvar cancer, with a look at future perspectives.

Abstract

The actual role of chemotherapy in vulvar cancer is undeniably a niche topic. The low incidence of the disease limits the feasibility of randomized trials. Decision making is thus oriented by clinical and pathological features, whose relevance is generally weighted against evidence from observational studies and clinical practice. The therapeutic management of vulvar cancer is increasingly codified and refined at an individual patient level. It is of note that the attitude towards evidence sharing and discussion within a multidisciplinary frame is progressively consolidating. Viable options included in the therapeutic armamentarium available for vulvar cancer patients are frequently an adaption from standards used for cervical or anal carcinoma. Chemotherapy is more frequently combined with radiotherapy as neo-/adjuvant or definitive treatment. Drugs commonly used are platinum derivative, 5-fluorouracil and mitomicin C, mostly in combination with radiotherapy for radiosensitization. Exclusive chemotherapy in the neo-/adjuvant setting comprises platinum-derivative, combined with bleomicin and methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, ifosfamide or taxanes. In advanced disease, current regimens include cisplatin-based chemoradiation, with or without 5-fluorouracil, or doublets with platinum in combination with a taxane. Our work is also enriched by a concise excursus on the biologic pathways underlying vulvar cancer. Introductory hints are also provided on targeted agents, a rapidly evolving research field.

Gynecologic Malignancies

Gynecologic malignancies are among the most prevalent cancers affecting women worldwide, but they are heterogeneous diseases with varying risk factors, management paradigms, and outcomes. Gynecologic cancers mediated by human papillomavirus (HPV) are preventable and curable with early detection and treatment. Dramatic reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality have been achieved through cancer screening and HPV vaccination. Radiotherapy plays a central role in the management of gynecologic malignancies. For some cancers, radiotherapy alone can be curative. More often, radiotherapy is used in conjunction with surgery and systemic therapy to improve locoregional control and extend overall survival. This chapter reviews recent advances in radiotherapeutic management of gynecologic malignancies.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2015 for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer are relatively rare tumors, and there had been no established treatment principles or guidelines to treat these rare tumors in Japan. The first version of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guidelines for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer was published in 2015 in Japanese.

OBJECTIVE

The JSGO committee decided to publish the English version of the JSGO guidelines worldwide, and hope it will be a useful guide to physicians in a similar situation as in Japan.

METHODS

The guideline was created according to the basic principles in creating the guidelines of JSGO.

RESULTS

The guidelines consist of five chapters and five algorithms. Prior to the first chapter, basic items are described including staging classification and history, classification of histology, and definition of the methods of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy to give the reader a better understanding of the contents of the guidelines for these rare tumors. The first chapter gives an overview of the guidelines, including the basic policy of the guidelines. The second chapter discusses vulvar cancer, the third chapter discusses vaginal cancer, and the fourth chapter discusses vulvar Paget's disease and malignant melanoma. Each chapter includes clinical questions, recommendations, backgrounds, objectives, explanations, and references. The fifth chapter provides supplemental data for the drugs that are mentioned in the explanation of clinical questions.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the objective of these guidelines is to clearly delineate the standard of care for vulvar and vaginal cancer with the goal of ensuring a high standard of care for all women diagnosed with these rare diseases.

Primary Versus Preoperative Radiation for Locally Advanced Vulvar Cancer

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate patterns of care and the survival impact of primary radiation and preoperative radiation therapy with surgery in women with locally advanced vulvar cancer using a large national cohort.

Methods and Materials

Women with vulvar cancer, diagnosed from 2004 to 2012, who received primary or preoperative radiation therapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patient characteristics, such as age, race, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and comorbidity score, were compared between those that received primary radiation only and those that received preoperative radiation with surgery using the χ2, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate. Overall survival (OS) by treatment approaches was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Factors associated with OS were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results

A total of 2046 women were identified; 1407 of these women (69%) received primary radiation therapy (RT; n = 421) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT; n = 986) (RT/CRT), and 639 women (31%) received preoperative RT (n = 92) or CRT (n = 547) followed by surgery (RT/CRT + S). The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging distributions were as follows: T1 (n = 152), T2 (n = 1436), T3 (n = 405), N0 (n = 899), N1 (n = 480), N2 (n = 445), and N3 (n = 40). Median follow-up was 21.9 months. Primary RT/CRT was associated with compromised OS, compared with preoperative RT/CRT + S (41.7% vs 57.1% at 3 years, respectively; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, OS associated with primary RT/CRT with doses more than 55 Gy was not significantly different from RT/CRT + S (hazards ratio, 1.139; 95% confidence interval, 0.969–1.338; P = 0.116). Use of concurrent chemotherapy improved OS of primary RT with doses more than 55 Gy compared with CRT + S (hazards ratio, 1.107; 95% confidence interval, 0.919–1.334; P = 0.234).

Conclusions

In a large nationwide analysis, primary nonsurgical management of vulvar cancer with RT was associated with compromised survival compared with preoperative RT with surgery. However, with doses more than 55 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy, nonoperative approaches had comparable survival compared with preoperative CRT + S.

Locally advanced vulva cancer: A single centre review of anovulvectomy and a systematic review of surgical, chemotherapy and radiotherapy alternatives. Is an international collaborative RCT destined for the "too difficult to do" box?

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of locally advanced vulva cancer (LAVC) remains challenging. Due to the lack of randomised trials many questions regarding the indications for different treatment options and their efficacy remain unanswered.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we provide the largest published series of LAVC patients treated with anovulvectomy, reporting oncological outcomes and morbidity. Additionally, a systematic literature review was performed for all treatment options 1946-2015.

RESULTS

In our case series, 57/70 (81%) patients were treated in the primary setting with anovulvectomy and 13 patients underwent anovulvectomy for recurrent disease. The median overall survival (OS) was 69months (1-336) with disease specific survival of 159months (1-336). Following anovulvectomy for primary disease, time to progression and OS were significantly higher in node negative disease (10 vs. 96months; 19 vs. 121months, p<0.0001). Post-surgical complications were observed in 36 (51.4%), the majority of which were Grade I/II infections. There was one peri-operative death. Review of the literature showed that chemotherapy, radiotherapy or combination treatments are alternatives to surgery. Evidence relating to all of these consisted mostly of small retrospective series, which varied considerably in terms of patient characteristics and treatment schedules. Significant patient and treatment heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis with significant biases in these studies. It was unclear if survival or morbidity was better in any one group with a lack of data reporting complications, quality of life, and long term follow-up. However, results for chemoradiation are encouraging enough to warrant further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains inadequate evidence to identify an optimal treatment for LAVC. However, there is sufficient evidence to support a trial of anovulvectomy versus chemoradiation. Discussions and consensus would be needed to determine trial criteria including the primary outcome measure. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone may be best reserved for the palliative setting or metastatic disease.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Vulvar Cancer

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes after chemoradiation (CRT) for the definitive (nonsurgical) treatment of vulvar cancer.

Materials and Methods

Women with vulvar cancer treated with definitive CRT at a single academic institution between 1994 and 2015 were retrospectively identified. Overall survival (OS), freedom from local recurrence, freedom from distant recurrence, and late toxicities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method at 3 years after radiotherapy completion. Univariate Cox regression models were used to estimate the effects of risk factors on these clinical end points. Acute and late toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 4.0.

Results

Twenty-five women met criteria for inclusion. At 3 years, OS was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49%–93%), freedom from local recurrence was 65% (95% CI, 43%–87%), and freedom from distant recurrence was 78% (95% CI, 59%–97%). Older age was significantly associated with decreased OS (hazard rate, 1.069/y; 95% CI, 1.005–1.124; P = 0.035) and local recurrence (hazard rate, 1.077/y; 95% CI, 1.009–1.150; P = 0.026). Larger size of the primary was borderline associated with distant recurrence (P = 0.057). Skin changes were the most common late toxicity, with a 3-year rate of late G3 skin toxicity of 45% (95% CI, 20%–69%). The rate of lymphedema at 3 years was 25% (95% CI, 5%–44%).

Conclusions

Definitive CRT for advanced vulvar cancer was an effective and well-tolerated approach for women with unresectable disease. Further work is needed to more appropriately select women who will benefit most from a nonsurgical approach.

Risk factors and treatment for recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Recurrent disease occurs in 12-37% of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Decisions about treatment of recurrent VSCC mainly depend on the location of the recurrence and previous treatment, resulting in individualized and consensus-based approaches. Most recurrences (40-80%) occur within 2 years after initial treatment. Currently, wide local excision is the treatment of choice for local recurrences. Isolated local recurrence of VSCC has a good prognosis, with reported 5-year survival rates of up to 60%. Groin recurrences and distant recurrences are less common and have an extremely poor prognosis. For groin recurrences, surgery with or without (chemo) radiotherapy is a treatment option, depending on prior treatment. For distant recurrences, there are only palliative treatment options. In this review, we give an overview of the available literature and discuss epidemiology, risk factors, and prognostic factors for the different types of recurrent VSCC and we describe treatment options and clinical outcome.

Patterns of care for locally advanced vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVE

Patients with locally advanced vulvar carcinoma can be treated with primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Neoadjuvant treatment appears to be associated with decreased morbidity and acceptable long-term outcomes. We examined the patterns of care for women with locally advanced vulvar cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to examine women with stage III-IVA vulvar cancer treated from 1988 to 2008. Primary therapy was classified as surgery or radiation. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to examine the use of primary radiotherapy.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 2292 women including 1757 who underwent primary surgery (76.7%) and 535 treated with primary radiation (23.3%). The use of primary radiation increased with time from 18.0% in 1988 to 30.1% in 2008. In a multivariable model, older women (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.72), black women (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.14-2.23), and patients with stage IVA tumors (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.78-2.81) were more likely to receive primary radiation. Among women treated with primary radiotherapy, only 17.8% ultimately underwent surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

The use of primary radiation for locally advanced vulvar cancer is limited but has increased over time. Multiple patient and tumor factors influence use. The majority of patients with stage III-IVA vulvar cancer treated with primary radiation therapy did not undergo surgical resection.

Chemotherapy of vulvar cancer: a review

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare disease with good prognosis if diagnosed early. The standard primary therapy is surgery. Neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy has been used to achieve resectability of the tumor and to decrease the radicality of the surgery. Chemotherapy with platinum compounds, paclitaxel and targeted therapy (erlotinib) has shown activity. International collaborative trials are needed to identify the best therapeutic strategy for patients with squamous cell cancer of the vulva who are not candidates for primary surgery or concomitant chemoradiation. We review the various treatment options available to patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the vulva.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

Alternative therapies have been sought to alleviate mutilation and morbidity associated with surgery for vulvar neoplasms. Our prime objective was to assess tumor absence in pathological vulvar and nodal specimens following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced vulvar neoplasms. Data were retrospectively collected from January 2001 to May 2009 from 22 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of inguino-pelvic radiotherapy (50 Gy) in association with chemotherapy when possible. Surgery occurred at intervals of between 5 to 8 weeks. The median age of patients at diagnosis was 74.1 years. All patients were primarily treated with radiotherapy and 15 received a concomitant chemotherapy. Additionally, all patients underwent radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy. Tumor absence in the vulvar and nodal pathological specimens was achieved for 6 (27%) patients, while absence in the vulvar pathological specimens was only achieved for 10 (45.4%) patients. Postoperative follow-up revealed breakdown of groin wounds, vulvar wounds and chronic lymphedema in 3 (14.3%), 7 (31.8%) and 14 cases (63.6%), respectively. Within a median follow-up time of 2.3 years [interquartile range (IQR), 0.6-4.6], 12 (54.6%) patients experienced complete remission and 6 cases succumbed to metastatic evolution within a median of 2.2 years (IQR, 0.6-4.6), with 1 case also experiencing perineal recurrence. Median survival time, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 5.1 years (IQR, 1.0-6.8). We suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may represent a reliable and promising strategy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

Locally advanced vulvar cancer in elderly women: is chemoradiation beneficial?

OBJECTIVES

There is a higher incidence of invasive vulvar cancer in the elderly population. With multiple medical comorbidities, radiation with sensitizing chemotherapy in the elderly can be complicated, yet the risks and benefits of chemoradiation have not been studied in this population. We investigate whether elderly patients are more likely to die of intercurrent disease (ICD) or of treatment complications.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed to compare remission rates, death from ICD or treatment complications, and rates of surgery in elderly and nonelderly patients with vulvar cancer treated with chemoradiation. Data were searched in the Cochrane Review. Eligibility criteria included: woman with advanced primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, women receiving preoperative or primary chemoradiation treatment with curative intent, and prospective studies that reported the necessary data of interest. Data collected included: age (elderly, defined as 65 years and above), stage, treatment, and mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy subjects were identified from 7 studies that met eligibility criteria. Seventy-eight percent (25/32) of patients younger than 65 years were without evidence of disease after treatment versus 66% (25/38) of patients aged 65 years and above (P=0.30). Three percent (1/32) of patients younger than 65 years of age died of ICD or treatment complications versus 11% (4/38) of patients 65 years and above (P=0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

We noticed a trend demonstrating death from ICD or treatment complications was higher for elderly patients. Future research should focus on treatment with chemoradiation in the elderly population with regard to survival benefit, toxicity, and death from ICD or treatment complications.

A phase II trial of radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy and concurrent weekly cisplatin chemotherapy in achieving a complete clinical and pathologic response when used for the primary treatment of locally-advanced vulvar carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with locally-advanced (T3 or T4 tumors not amenable to surgical resection via radical vulvectomy), previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were treated with radiation (1.8 Gy daily × 32 fractions=57.6 Gy) plus weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) followed by surgical resection of residual tumor (or biopsy to confirm complete clinical response). Management of the groin lymph nodes was standardized and was not a statistical endpoint. Primary endpoints were complete clinical and pathologic response rates of the primary vulvar tumor.

RESULTS

A planned interim analysis indicated sufficient activity to reopen the study to a second stage of accrual. Among 58 evaluable patients, there were 40 (69%) who completed study treatment. Reasons for prematurely discontinuing treatment included: patient refusal (N=4), toxicity (N=9), death (N=2), other (N=3). There were 37 patients with a complete clinical response (37/58; 64%). Among these women there were 34 who underwent surgical biopsy and 29 (78%) who also had a complete pathological response. Common adverse effects included leukopenia, pain, radiation dermatitis, pain, or metabolic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of radiation therapy plus weekly cisplatin successfully yielded high complete clinical and pathologic response rates with acceptable toxicity.

Chemoradiation for advanced primary vulval cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulval cancer is a rare gynaecological cancer. There is no standard approach for treating locally advanced primary vulval cancer (FIGO stage III and IV). Combined treatment modalities have been developed using radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. The advantages and disadvantages of such treatment is not well evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant and primary chemoradiation for women with locally advanced primary vulval cancer compared to other primary modalities of treatment such as primary surgery or primary radiation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE (to July 2009). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies that included multivariate analyses of chemoradiation in women with locally advanced, primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. An adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was calculated for one non-randomised study and risk ratios (RRs) were used in an RCT to compare five-year death rates and adverse events in women who received neoadjuvant, primary chemoradiation or primary surgery. Adverse events were also reported more extensively in a further non-randomised study. All results were displayed in single study analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

One RCT and two non-randomised studies that allowed for multivariate analyses met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 141 women.One RCT found that neoadjuvant chemoradiation did not appear to offer longer survival compared to primary surgery in advanced vulval tumours (RR = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.91). There was also no statistically significant difference in survival between primary chemoradiation and primary surgery in a study that included 63 women (pooled adjusted HR= 1.09, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.17) and in another study that only included 12 eligible women and compared the same interventions (HR was non-informative when statistical adjustment was made).Adverse events were extensively reported in only one study, which found no statistically significant difference in risk of adverse events between primary chemoradiation and primary surgery due to the very small numbers in each group. In the RCT there was no observed statistically significant difference between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and primary surgery. Adverse events were not reported in the largest study of 63 women. Quality of life (QoL) was not reported in any of the included studies. All studies were at high risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Women with advanced vulval tumours showed no significant difference in overall survival or treatment-related adverse events when chemoradiation (primary or neoadjuvant) was compared with primary surgery.The retrospective studies had a high risk of bias as the entry criteria for primary chemoradiation was based on inoperability or tumour requiring exenteration.The radiochemotherapy regimens varied widely. There was no data on QoL.There is no standard terminology for 'operable and inoperable vulval cancer', and for 'primary and neoadjuvant chemoradiation'. Stratification according to unresectability of the primary tumour and/or lymph nodes is needed, for good quality comparison.

The role of chemo-radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced carcinoma of the vulva: single institutional experience and review of literature

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively investigate the outcome and toxicity of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2007, 28 consecutive patients with LAVC were treated with chemoradiation (20 primary tumors and 8 loco-regional recurrences). Treatment consists of 2 separate courses of external-beam radiotherapy (40 Gy-2 weeks split-20 Gy). During each course of radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m/d), was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over the first 4 days, and mitomycin-C (10 mg/m on day 1), as a bolus intravenous injection. Outcome measures were rates of complete and partial response, loco-regional control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 42 months and the median age of patients was 68 years. Twenty patients (72%) achieved complete remission, 4 patients (14%) partial remission, for an overall response rate of 86%. Four patients (14%) had progressive disease directly after chemo-radiotherapy. The actuarial rates of loco-regional control, progression-free survival and overall survival at 4 years were 75%, 71%, and 65%, respectively. There was no treatment break for acute toxicity. Vulvar desquamation was the main acute treatment-related side effect (93%). Three patients developed transient grade 2 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Mild skin fibrosis and atrophy (n = 6, 21%), radiation ulcer (n = 4, 14%, in one patient treatment was needed), telangectasia (n = 3, 11%), and lymphoedema (n = 2, 7%) were the most common late toxicity of chemoradiation.

CONCLUSION

These data support the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an effective alternative to primary ultra-radical surgery to treat LAVC with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Carcinoma of the vulva

The objective of this review is to summarize the published data about squamous carcinoma of the vulva and to identify promising areas for future investigation. Rather than the routine use of complete radical vulvectomy, a radical wide excision of the vulvar lesion to achieve at least a 1-cm gross margin appears sufficient to treat the primary lesion. A surgical assessment of the groin is required for all patients who have invasion greater than 1 mm. Ipsilateral groin node dissection can be performed through a separate incision. All the nodal tissue medial to the vessels and above the fascia should be removed. Sentinel node evaluation may be a significant step forward, but the false-negative rate is not well enough defined to consider this a standard. Patients with positive inguinal nodes at groin dissection should receive radiation therapy to the ipsilateral groin and hemipelvis. For those patients who have unresectable primary disease or if nodes are palpably suspicious, fixed, and/or ulcerated preoperatively, chemoradiation is the preferred option. Exenterative procedures may rarely be required. Chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease has not been proven to be of value. Although survival rates are high for those with negative nodes, the morbidity associated with standard radical techniques has prompted innovation. Adequately powered trials aimed at further reducing morbidity without compromising survival are underway.

Advanced vulvar carcinoma: Is it worth operating? A perioperative management protocol for radical and reconstructive surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the means whereby the results could be improved and the morbidity and side-effects minimized, of radical and extensive surgery performed together with plastic reconstruction, in the treatment of locally advanced and relapsed vulvar carcinoma.

METHODS

Between May 2000 and November 2004, twenty-three patients with locally advanced or relapsed vulvar carcinoma underwent major radical or extended vulvectomy, requiring reconstructive surgery. A consistent protocol for the perioperative management of these patients, including precautionary measures to reduce the rate of early complications, was introduced in the second study period (from November 2003) to verify the benefit on surgical outcome.

RESULTS

An analysis of the medical reports showed an improvement in the median time of the postoperative course and related morbidity as a consequence of a strict application of the management protocol, with consequent decrease of early complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructive surgery, which broadens the spectrum of available operative therapy in primary and locally recurrent vulvar cancer, is characterized by a high complication rate. The application of a strict perioperative protocol could reduce the number and the clinical impact of such complications.

Surgery and radiotherapy in vulvar cancer

The majority of patients with vulvar cancer have squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The cornerstone of the treatment is surgery. Radical vulvectomy with "en bloc" inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy has led to a favorable prognosis but with impressive morbidity. Nowadays, treatment is more individualized with wide local excision with uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy via separate incisions as the standard treatment for early stage patients with SCC of the vulva with depth of invasion >1 mm without suspicious groins. In case of more than one intranodal lymph node metastasis and/or extranodal growth, postoperative radiotherapy on the groins and pelvis is warranted. Until now there is a limited role for primary radiotherapy on the vulva and/or groins in early stage disease. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure with the combined technique (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with a radioactive tracer and intraoperative blue dye) is a promising staging technique for patients with early stage vulvar cancer. The safety of clinical implementation of the SLN procedure and the role of additional histopathological techniques of the SLNs need to be further investigated before its wide-scale application. Patients with advanced vulvar cancer are difficult to treat. One of the problems in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer is the high incidence of concomitant bulky lymph nodes in the groin(s). Ultraradical surgery in case of resectable disease will lead to impressive morbidity because of the exenterative-type procedure. (Chemo)radiation with or without surgery should be regarded as the first choice for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer only when primary surgery will necessitate performance of a stoma. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal combined modality treatment in these patients. Due to the fact that vulvar cancer is a rare disease, further clinical studies will only be possible, when international collaborative groups will join forces in order to perform clinical trials, in which different treatment options such as SLN procedure, primary radiotherapy on the groins and multimodality treatment for advanced disease will be investigated.

Old and new perspectives in the management of high-risk, locally advanced or recurrent, and metastatic vulvar cancer

During the last decades there has been a continuing evolution in the surgical approach of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva that has been traditionally treated with radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. Patients with T1 tumour are usually treated with radical local excision, if the lesion is unifocal and the remainder of the vulva is normal. Patients with T1a disease have no risk of groin metastases and do not need lymphadenectomy, whereas those with T1b disease need ipsilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is lateral, and bilateral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is midline. Modifications of the surgical technique of deep femoral lymphadenectomy and the mapping of sentinel node can offer new interesting therapeutic perspectives. Postoperative adjuvant pelvic and groin irradiation is warranted for patients with two or more or macroscopically involved groin nodes. Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva has been long surgically treated with en-block radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy plus partial resection of urethra, vagina or anum, or by exenteration, with severe postsurgical complications, poor quality of life, and unsatisfactory survival rates. 5-Fluorouracil [5-FU] or 5-FU- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with irradiation followed by tailored surgery represents an attractive therapeutic option for advanced disease, planned to avoid such ultra-radical surgical procedures and, hopefully, to improve patient outcome. Chemotherapy has also been used in neoadjuvant setting, with contrasting and generally unsatisfactory results, and in palliative treatment of patients with distant metastases. Surgery is the primary treatment also for vulvar malignancies other than squamous cell carcinoma, whereas the clinical usefulness of adjuvant irradiation or chemotherapy is still to be defined. Primary chemoradiation can be also used for advanced carcinoma of the Bartholin gland or for advanced adenocarcinoma associated with extramammary Paget's disease. The drugs used for chemotherapy of metastatic melanomas or sarcomas of the vulva are the same employed for the melanomas or sarcomas developed in other sites.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for advanced primary vulvar cancer

BACKGROUND

In advanced stage primary vulvar cancer, treatment is tailored to individual patient needs. Combined treatment modalities have been developed, using chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the combined treatment strategy using concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery is effective and safe in vulvar cancer patients with advanced primary disease. Main outcomes of interest were: types of surgical intervention following chemoradiation and survival, recurrence and complication rates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Specialised Register. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CANCERLIT, other databases and reference lists of articles. The latest search was conducted on 12 March 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies of curative treatment of patients with advanced, primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were included. Treatment included concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty-eight abstracts and papers were selected either by the search strategy or by checking the cross references. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were not available. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. (Eifel 1995; Landoni 1996; Montana 2000; Moore 1998; Scheistroen 1993). Two authors (HCvD, MV-L) independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Chemotherapy was given uniformly within each of the five selected studies. However, four different chemoradiation schedules were applied. Radiotherapy dose fractionation techniques, fields and target definitions varied. Skin toxicity was observed in nearly all patients. Wound breakdown, infection, lymphedema, lymphorrhea and lymphoceles were also common. Operability was achieved in 63 to 92% of cases in the four studies using 5FU and CDDP or 5FU and MMC. In contrast, only 20% of the patients who received Bleomycin were operable after chemoradiation. After a follow up of 5 to 125 months, 26 to 63% of participants were alive and well. A total of 27 to 85% of participants died due to treatment related causes or disease. The five studies included in this review show that preoperative chemoradiotherapy reduces tumour size and improves operability. However, complications of treatment are considerable and information on the effects of quality of life (QOL) is not available. Furthermore, treatment results of the respective studies diverge considerably.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Patients with inoperable primary tumours or lymph nodes benefit from chemoradiation if an operation can be performed. In patients with large tumours that can only be treated with anterior and/or posterior exenteration complications of neoadjuvant therapy might outweigh complications of exenterative surgery. With the current knowledge neoadjuvant therapy is not justified in patients with tumours that can be adequately treated with radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin node dissection alone.

Carcinoma of the vulva: Combined modality treatment

One of the most significant developments in recent decades in the management of malignant diseases is the recognition that surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy have limited curative potential. Along with this recognition has come the realization that although some patients can be cured with one of these modalities alone, the judicious combination of these modalities can result in better outcome. Carcinoma of the vulva, a disease that presents challenges with its management because of its anatomic location, affinity for spread to the lymph nodes, and incidence in elderly patients, lends itself to the use of this multimodality approach. The specific purpose of this approach is to decrease the sequelae of radical surgery. In addition, patients that could not be considered candidates for any treatment, such as patients with unresectable nodes, can be offered therapy with potential of cure. The patients with moderately or very advanced disease should be considered for the combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. This combined therapy results in better outcome with lesser morbidity. The studies that have been carried out in recent years for patients with advanced carcinoma of the vulva have helped to establish treatment guidelines that can be followed with confidence until more information becomes available.

Risk of occult inguinofemoral lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinoma of the vulva

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to correlate preoperative primary tumor size and American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics categories with the risk of subclinical metastases from squamous carcinoma of the vulva to inguinofemoral nodes in patients with a palpably negative groin preoperatively.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical notes, operative reports, and pathology reports from 1955 to 1990 were reviewed to assign retrospectively 1969 American Joint Committee on Cancer N(0) and N(1) and 1988 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics T categories.

RESULTS

Of 446 patients with primary carcinoma of the vulva, 226 had a groin without features indicative of lymph node metastasis. Occult groin node metastases were detected in 15.2%, 30.0%, 24.5%, and 0% of patients with T(1), T(2), T(3), and T(4) cancers, respectively. Subclinical node metastases were found in 7.0%, 22.2%, 26.9%, 34.1%, and 20.0% of patients with primary cancers measuring 1.0 cm or less, 1.1 to 2.0 cm, 2.1 to 3.0 cm, 3.1 to 5.0 cm, and larger than 5 cm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy assessment for elective groin node irradiation and quantitative description of the radiation dose-control relationship for subclinical disease should be based on estimates of the risk of subclinical disease within the target volume. This study may help to assess the effectiveness of current therapies.

Local and regional recurrence of vulval cancer: management dilemmas

Vulval cancer has an incidence of 1-2/100000. Approximately one-third of patients develop recurrent disease usually within the first 2 years following primary treatment. Isolated vulval recurrences account for up to 50% of all cases and these recurrences are often amenable to curative surgery with radical wide local excision. Reconstruction and skin closure for larger surgical defects necessitate skin flaps. Radical exenterative procedures are considered when the recurrence involves the urethra, bladder, vagina and/or the anorectal canal. Chemoradiation therapy may be used pre-operatively or to palliate the disease. Disease recurrence in the groin is difficult to treat and is associated with very poor survival rates. Surgical effort to debulk large-volume groin disease is often unsuccessful and chemoradiation therapy is the cornerstone of treatment. The management of retroperitoneal and distant disease recurrence is generally based on symptom control as radiation therapy and chemotherapy have limited success. Palliative medicine should be integrated early in the management plan both in patients with incurable recurrent disease and in those undergoing potentially curative treatments.

Squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva: locally advanced disease

About 30-40% of vulvar cancers present with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) (clinical) stage III or IV disease. Although surgical staging was introduced by FIGO in 1988 and hard data on this system are still relatively few, a review of our own patients suggests that this percentage of patients with advanced stage vulvar cancer probably still holds. We have considered carcinoma of the vulva to be locally advanced when the primary or recurring tumour cannot be locally managed by a radical vulvar resection. Current approaches to the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer include ultraradical surgery, radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and a combination of treatment modalities. This chapter reviews the current approaches to the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Skin metastases from vulvar cancer: a fatal event

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous metastases from a vulval cancer are exceptional with only 4 reported cases in the literature.

CASE

The present case is a patient who had a radical vulvectomy with bilateral groin node dissection for a vulvar cancer stage Ib. After 9 months she a local recurrence, which was treated with radiotherapy. An anterior exenteration was performed 8 months later for a second local recurrence. Three months thereafter she had skin metastases at her thighs and calves. Chemotherapy was started; yet the lesions slowly increased. The treatment was discontinued and she died 4 months later.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin metastases must be considered a preterminal event with no well-established treatment. They could be caused by retrograde permeation of tumor cells after the destruction of the local draining system.

Less common gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVES

To review the incidence, etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and nursing implications of the uncommon gynecologic malignancies of vulvar carcinoma, vaginal carcinoma, sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary, and gestational trophoblastic tumors.

DATA SOURCES

Research studies, review articles, medical and nursing textbooks.

CONCLUSIONS

Vulvar and vaginal cancers, sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary, and gestational trophoblastic tumors are rare malignancies constituting less than 5% of all malignant diagnoses. If detected early these malignancies have a high possibility of cure.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses play an important role in the education of women and patients to the signs and symptoms of gynecologic malignancies, the disease process, treatment options, follow-up care, and resources available to these women.

Recurrent vulvar cancer

Recurrent vulvar cancer occurs in an average of 24% of cases after primary treatment after surgery with or without radiation. The relatively few primary vulvar cancers, combined with the low proportion of recurrences, has made it difficult to perform randomized studies to document the most appropriate therapeutic modalities. Most reports are small retrospective studies and anecdotal reviews that have emphasized the importance of surgery and have led to new approaches with respect to chemoradiation. Traditionally, the most accepted treatment of vulvar cancer has been and continues to be surgery. Recently, radiation and chemotherapy have been combined with very encouraging results. The therapeutic modality used depends on the location and extent of the recurrence. Most recurrences occur locally near the original resection margins or at the ipsilateral inguinal or pelvic lymph nodes. Lateralized local vulvar recurrences treated with a wide radical local excision with inguinal lymphadectomy results in an excellent cure rate of 70%. With a central pelvic recurrence with antecedent radiotherapy involving the urethra, upper vagina, and rectum, total pelvic exenteration is indicated in a select group of patients with curative intent. Radiotherapy or chemoradiation concomitantly with wide radical local excision of an advanced vulvar has proven successful in avoiding an exenteration, with improved survival and less morbidity. Prospective and retrospective studies have shown excellent results using radiation or chemoradiation with wide radical local excision in patients with locally advanced disease in whom adequate resection margins are difficult to achieve (with a central lesion requiring exenteration) or with debilitating medical conditions that preclude surgery. In these patients, chemoradiation has shown favorable results when used before a wide local resection. In patients with advanced local disease, external beam and interstitial radiation has been used for palliative and curative intent with encouraging results. Regional recurrences to the inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes have been shown to have a poor prognosis with a high mortality rate. We recommend that inguinal recurrences without prior radiation therapy undergo excision followed by radiotherapy with chemosensitization. In patients with previous radiation to the inguinal lymph nodes, we try to avoid any excisional procedures because of the high rate of complications. We offer these patients brachytherapy for palliation. With pelvic recurrences, we recommended chemoradiation as the treatment modality. In the subset of patients with distant metastasis, chemotherapy may be offered; however, few studies have been performed to advocate any single combination. The literature supports the use of 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin as single agents or in combination to have sensitivity against squamous cells. There are few studies revealing improvement in 5-year survival, thus these patients may benefit from recruitment into research protocols.

Preoperative chemo-radiation for carcinoma of the vulva with N2/N3 nodes: a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

To determine if patients with carcinoma of the vulva, with N2/N3 lymph nodes, could undergo resection of the lymph nodes and primary tumor following preoperative chemo-radiation. METHODS AND MATERILAS: Fifty-two patients were entered in the study, but six patients did not meet the criteria of the protocol and were excluded. The remaining 46 patients are the subject of this report. Patients underwent a split course of radiation, 4760 cGy to the primary and lymph nodes, with concurrent chemotherapy, cisplatin/5-FU, followed by surgery.

RESULTS

Four patients did not complete the chemo-radiation, because three expired and one refused to complete the treatment. Four patients who completed chemo-radiation did not undergo surgery, because two of them died of non-cancer-related causes, and in the other two patients, the nodes remained unresectable. Following chemo-radiation, the disease in the lymph nodes became resectable in 38/40 patients. Two patients who completed the course of chemo-radiation did not undergo surgery as per protocol because of pulmonary metastasis. One underwent radical vulvectomy and unilateral node dissection and the other radical vulvectomy only. The specimen of the lymph nodes was histologically negative in 15/37 patients. Nineteen patients developed recurrent and/or metastatic disease. The sites of failure were as follows: primary area only, 9; lymph node area only, 1; primary area and distant metastasis, 1; distant metastasis only, 8. Local control of the disease in the lymph nodes was achieved in 36/37 and in the primary area in 29/38 of the patients. Twenty patients are alive and disease-free, and five have expired without evidence of recurrence or metastasis. Two patients died of treatment-related complications.

CONCLUSION

High resectability and local control rates of the lymph nodes were obtained in patients with carcinoma of the vulva with N2/N3 nodes treated preoperatively with chemo-radiation.

Preliminary results of chemoradiation as a primary treatment for vulvar carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the role of chemoradiation as a primary treatment for vulvar carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 1989 and August 1997, there were 14 patients with the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Two patients were excluded from this study because of advanced stage at presentation. Key information about the remaining 12 patients was extracted from their charts. All patients had biopsy prior to treatment, and were treated with chemoradiation. Radiation was administered to the vulva only. Surgical biopsies from the vulva and inguinal nodal dissection were done 4-6 weeks after radiation treatment. All patients were followed for evaluation of response and clinical detection of recurrence. The period of follow-up ranged from 8 to 125 months. Mean follow-up period was 41 months.

RESULTS

All 12 patients showed complete response to the treatment. Only 1 patient (8.3%) developed local recurrence at 3 months posttreatment. Another patient (8.3%) developed nodal recurrence at 30 months posttreatment. Both patients were salvaged by surgical treatment and remained disease free. The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival was 43%. The actuarial 3-year disease-free survival was 84%. The majority of patients developed mild-to-moderate complications due to chemoradiation. These were well tolerated and responded to medical treatment. None of the patients developed late complications to chemoradiation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoradiation is an effective primary treatment for vulvar carcinoma as shown by these successfully managed cases.

Chemoradiation as primary or adjuvant treatment for locally advanced carcinoma of the vulva

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of primary or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) on the survival rates of patients with locally advanced vulvar carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1973 and 1998, 54 patients with vulvar cancer were treated with radiation therapy, among which 20 received CRT, while 34 patients received radiation therapy (RT) alone. Of the 20 patients, 14 were treated for primary or recurrent disease (pCRT), and 6 after radical vulvectomy for high-risk disease (aCRT). Of the 34 patients, 12 were treated primarily (pRT) and 22 received adjuvant treatment (aRT). Chemotherapy consisted of 2 courses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C administered during RT. Six patients received cisplatin in place of mitomycin C. In CRT groups, radiation was administered to the vulva, pelvic, and inguinal lymph nodes to a median dose of 45 Gy with additional 6-17 Gy to gross disease. In RT groups, the median dose to the microscopic diseases was 45 Gy. Nine patients received external beam boost and 16 patients received supplementary brachytherapy in the forms of (226)Ra or (241)Am plaques to sites of macroscopic disease.

RESULTS

Overall survival was superior in the patients treated with pCRT versus pRT with statistical significance (p = 0.04). There was also a statistically significant improvement in disease-specific (p = 0.03) and relapse-free survival (p = 0.01) favoring pCRT. No statistically significant trends of improved survival rates favoring aCRT over aRT were observed.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy decreases local relapse rate, improves disease-specific and overall survival over RT alone as primary treatment for locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Preoperative chemoradiation for advanced vulvar cancer: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of using preoperative chemoradiotherapy to avert the need for more radical surgery for patients with T3 primary tumors, or the need for pelvic exenteration for patients with T4 primary tumors, not amenable to resection by standard radical vulvectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy-three evaluable patients with clinical Stage III-IV squamous cell vulvar carcinoma were enrolled in this prospective, multi-institutional trial. Treatment consisted of a planned split course of concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy followed by surgical excision of the residual primary tumor plus bilateral inguinal-femoral lymph node dissection. Radiation therapy was delivered to the primary tumor volume via anterior-posterior-posterior-anterior (AP-PA) fields in 170-cGy fractions to a dose of 4760 cGy. Patients with inoperable groin nodes received chemoradiation to the primary vulvar tumor, inguinal-femoral and lower pelvic lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Seven patients did not undergo a post-treatment surgical procedure: deteriorating medical condition (2 patients); other medical condition (1 patient); unresectable residual tumor (2 patients); patient refusal (2 patients). Following chemoradiotherapy, 33/71 (46.5%) patients had no visible vulvar cancer at the time of planned surgery and 38/71 (53.5%) had gross residual cancer at the time of operation. Five of the latter 38 patients had positive resection margins and underwent: further radiation therapy to the vulva (3 patients); wide local excision and vaginectomy necessitating colostomy (1 patient); no further therapy (1 patient). Using this strategy of preoperative, split-course, twice-daily radiation combined with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy, only 2/71 (2.8%) had residual unresectable disease. In only three patients was it not possible to preserve urinary and/or gastrointestinal continence. Toxicity was acceptable, with acute cutaneous reactions to chemoradiotherapy and surgical wound complications being the most common adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is feasible, and may reduce the need for more radical surgery including primary pelvic exenteration.

[Late effects of ionizing radiations on the vulva, vagina and uterus]

Reporting and scoring complications after radiotherapy of gynaecological cancers is difficult because of the variety of treatment techniques involved. Use of an international classification is necessary to compare results obtained in series of patients treated in different institutions. An international group of experts designed in the early nineties the so-called French-Italian glossary. This classification of late effects is now completed with the new LENT SOMA scales. This paper contains details of these late changes, including their pathophysiology, clinical syndromes, potential treatment, and prevention.

Radio-Chemotherapy of Vulvar Cancer

Surgery alone, more or less demolitive, is the treatment of choice of vulvar cancers. Cure rates are high for early cancers only, while locally advanced tumors with or without inguinal adenopathies and recurrences have a bad prognosis. The excellent results of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy of anal cancers suggested to adopt the same approach for locally advanced vulvar cancers. The shrinkage of the tumor allowed surgery, often less demolitive than usual, and the pathological examination demonstrated an overall complete response in 40% of cases. Survival has been improved through this multidisciplinary approach. Patients not suitable for surgery obtained important remissions and an improved quality of life. Clinical experience at the Istituto Tumori of Milano is presented.

Prophylactic chemoradiation of inguinofemoral lymph nodes in patients with locally extensive vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVE

Primary surgical resection of locally advanced squamous cancer of the vulva may compromise the integrity of important midline structures such as the anus, clitoris, urethra, and vagina. Chemoradiation (synchronous radiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy) has been used as alternative initial treatment which may serve as definitive management for some patients, or may reduce the scope and functional sequelae of subsequent surgery in others. Inguinofemoral node dissection is associated with substantial risk of both acute and late morbidity, prompting consideration of elective inclusion of groin nodes within the irradiated volume and deletion of subsequent groin surgery. Concern that disease relapse in the groins is potentially fatal suggested the prudence of formal outcome assessment of our recent experience with prophylactic treatment of clinically uninvolved groin nodes in the context of concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced primary vulvar cancer.

METHODS

A review was conducted of 23 previously untreated patients with locally advanced squamous cancer of the vulva (2 T2, 20 T3, 1 T4) and clinically uninvolved groin nodes (1969 FIGO stages 14 N0, 4 N1, and 5 N2 with negative node biopsies) who were treated since 1987 with chemoradiation administered to a volume electively including bilateral inguinofemoral nodes. These patients did not undergo subsequent groin surgery.

RESULTS

With follow-up from 6 to 98 months (mean, 45.3 months; median, 42 months), no patient has failed in the prophylactically irradiated inguinofemoral nodes. No patient has developed lymphedema, vascular insufficiency, or neurological injury in a lower extremity, and no patient has experienced aseptic necrosis of a femur.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective irradiation of the groin nodes in the context of initial chemoradiation for locally advanced vulvar cancer is an effective therapy associated with acceptable acute toxicity and minimal late sequelae. It constitutes a sensible alternative to groin dissection in this patient population.

Primary radiation, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced squamous carcinoma of the vulva

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a regimen of radiation and chemotherapy as an alternative for those patients in whom the location and extent of advanced vulvar carcinoma make pelvic exenteration the only surgical option.

METHODS

Between December 1988 and March 1995, 14 patients with primary squamous carcinoma of the vulva who were not candidates for standard radical vulvectomy were treated with radiation therapy in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy at the Albany Medical Center. Patients ranged in age from 40 to 90 years, mean 68. Tumors were stage III in 9 patients and stage IV in 5 patients. Treatment included two cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 x 96 hr) in addition to radiation therapy. Total radiation doses to the vulva and groins ranged from 50 to 65 Gray (Gy), with pelvic doses of 45 to 50 Gy. Surgical excision of the primary site was not performed in patients who had complete clinical response.

RESULTS

Acute complications included desquamation requiring treatment interruptions in 5 patients and deep venous thrombosis in 1 patient. Delayed complications were limited to small bowel obstruction and colonic stricture in one patient. There was a 92% response rate with complete responses in 9 patients (64%). Among patients with complete clinical response, there has been only one recurrence with follow-up of 7-81 months, mean 36.5. All patients with partial responses died, with survival of 8-25 months, mean 15.7.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of chemoradiation was found to be effective therapy for locally advanced vulvar carcinoma, with acceptable morbidity even in an elderly population. Surgical excision of the primary site is not necessary in patients with complete response.

In vitro concurrent paclitaxel and radiation of four vulvar squamous cell carcinoma cell lines

BACKGROUND

The antitubule agent paclitaxel causes a cell cycle blockage in the most radiosensitive part of the cell cycle, the G2/M phase. The possible radiosensitizing effect of paclitaxel was tested in four vulvar (UM-SCV-1A, UM-SCV-1B, UM-SCV-2, and UM-SCV-4) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines.

METHODS

A 96-well plate clonogenic assay was performed with paclitaxel and radiation, both separately and concomitantly. Survival data were fitted to the linear quadratic model. The area under the curve, equivalent to the mean inactivation dose (D), was obtained by numerical integration. The effect of paclitaxel on radiosensitivity was measured as the AUC ratio (paclitaxel plus radiation: radiation alone). This ratio was compared with the surviving fraction (SFP) after paclitaxel alone.

RESULTS

Paclitaxel concentrations of 0.4 to 2.0 nanomolar (nM) caused 1 to 70% inhibition of clonogenic survival. The AUC values of the cell lines were 1.9 to 2.9 gray. A full additive effect was observed when paclitaxel and radiation were administered concurrently; however, a supra-additive effect never occurred. The type of paclitaxel radiation interaction was not affected by the concentration of the drug nor did the type of interaction vary between cell lines studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel and radiation used concomitantly produced a clear additive effect at all concentrations and in all vulvar carcinoma cell lines tested. Although no supra-additive effect was observed, the additive effect already in nM concentrations could be beneficial in clinical use and, therefore, requires further investigation.

Combined preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery in locally advanced vulvar carcinoma. A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Although for decades exenterative surgery has represented the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer, combined approaches, including preoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy, are now considered the treatment of choice. We report the results of a pilot study on concurrent chemoradiotheraphy followed by radical surgery for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were treated with two courses of combination chemotherapy mitomycin C, 15 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1, and 5-fluorouracil, 750 mg/m2 i.v., in continuous 24-hour infusion on Days 1 to 5. Inguinal and pelvic lymph node chains and the vulva were irradiated (starting on the same day as the chemotherapy) up to a total dose of 36 Gy. After a 2-week interval, a second course of chemoradiotherapy was given (18 Gy on the vulvar region only). After 2 weeks, patients underwent radical surgery.

RESULTS

An objective response was observed in 22 of 24 primary cases (91.6%) and in 7 of 7 recurrent cases. All but two unresponsive patients underwent radical surgery. The postoperative morbidity rate was 65% (19 of 29 patients), and the mortality rate was 13.8% (4 of 29 patients). Five of nine patients (55%) with biopsy-proven inguinal lymph node metastases showed no residual lymph node disease in the surgical specimen. The recurrence rate was 31.8% and the medial follow-up time was 34 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoradiotherapy seems to be effective for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. If treatment-related morbidity could be decreased, such a combined approach might offer a new perspectives for a conservative treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Prospective phase I/II studies of definitive irradiation and chemotherapy for advanced gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE

This is a prospective study to evaluate toxicity and efficacy of concurrent irradiation and three cycles of chemotherapy bolus cisplatin and infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 I.V. rapid infusion, and 5-day continuous infusion of 5FU (750 mg/m2 per day (schedule A); or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. rapid infusion, and 4-day continuous infusion of 5FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day (schedule B). Schedule A was given to 25 patients in the first 36 months of the study and was changed to schedule B in an additional 42 patients. All patients received irradiation, which usually consisted of 20 Gy whole pelvis, 30-40 Gy split field, and two intracavitary insertions for a total of 80-90 Gy to point A. Primary cervical cancer occurred in 40 patients with 3 having stage IB bulky, 2 with stage IIA, 5 with stage IIB, 2 with stage IIIA, 23 with stage IIIB, 4 with stage IV, and 1 with stage IVB. Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy occurred in 18 patients. The remainder of the patients consisted of two each with stages III and IV endometrial carcinoma, two with stage III vaginal carcinoma, two with stage III vulvar carcinoma, and one with recurrent vulvar carcinoma. Patients were treated from 1985 through 1992.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survivals for patients with stages IB (bulky)-IIB cervical cancer was 70%, 25% for stages IIIA-IVA, and 39% for patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma. All four patients with endometrial carcinoma have recurred and died. Two patients with vulvar carcinoma are alive and free of disease, and one is dead of intercurrent disease. One patient with stage III vaginal carcinoma is alive and free of disease, while the other recurred and died. No significant differences were observed in the toxicity of the two chemotherapy schedules. There were 9/39 (23%) grade 4 and one fatal complication in those with primary cervical carcinoma. The overall fistulae rate was 11% (4/39) with three patients developing rectovaginal fistulae and one having vesicovaginal fistula.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemotherapy and irradiation for advanced gynecologic malignancies as administered in this study is highly toxic and fails to demonstrate an obvious survival improvement.