Randomized prospective trial of 5 versus 10 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced ovarian carcinoma

Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).

Ovarian Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States and is the country's fifth most common cause of cancer mortality in women. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. These NCCN Guidelines discuss cancers originating in the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, as these are all managed in a similar manner. Most of the recommendations are based on data from patients with the most common subtypes─high-grade serous and grade 2/3 endometrioid. The NCCN Guidelines also include recommendations specifically for patients with less common ovarian cancers, which in the guidelines include the following: carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, low-grade serous, grade 1 endometrioid, borderline epithelial, malignant sex cord-stromal, and malignant germ cell tumors. This manuscript focuses on certain aspects of primary treatment, including primary surgery, adjuvant therapy, and maintenance therapy options (including PARP inhibitors) after completion of first-line chemotherapy.

Maintenance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/carboplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: randomized study of an Asian Gynecologic Oncology Group

Objectives

An Asian Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III randomized trial was conducted to determine whether maintenance chemotherapy could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in stages III/IV ovarian cancer.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2014, 45 newly-diagnosed ovarian cancer patients were enrolled after complete remission and randomized (1:1) to arm A (4-weekly carboplatin area under the curve 4 and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD] 30 mg/m², n=24) for 6 cycles or arm B (observation, n=21). The primary end-point was PFS. A post hoc translational study was conducted to deep sequence BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) genes, because BRCA/HRD mutations (BRCA/HRDm) are known to be associated with better prognosis.

Results

Enrollment was slow, accrual was closed when 7+ years had passed. With a median follow-up of 88.9 months, the median PFS was significantly better in arm A (55.5 months) than arm B (9.2 months) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.19–0.87; p=0.020), yet the median overall survival was not significantly different in arm A (not reached) than arm B (95.1 months) (p=0.148). Overall grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent in arm A than arm B (60.9% vs 0.0%) (p<0.001). Quality of life was generally not significantly different. Distribution of BRCA1/2m or BRCA/HRDm was not significantly biased between the two arms. Wild-type BRCA/non-HRD subgroup seemed to fare better with maintenance therapy (HR=0.35; 95% CI=0.11–1.18; p=0.091).

Conclusions

Despite limitations in small sample size, it suggests that maintenance carboplatin-PLD chemotherapy could improve PFS in advanced ovarian cancer.

The Evolving Arena of Ovarian Cancer Maintenance Therapy

Based on the results of several phase 3 randomized trials, "maintenance therapy" (prolonged treatment after an initial response to cytotoxic chemotherapy) has assumed a critical role in the routine care of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. While earlier data had provided support for this therapeutic concept in disease management (e.g., multiple cycles of single-agent paclitaxel following a clinical complete response to a platinum/paclitaxel regimen), more recent data has revealed both the efficacy and safety of the anti-angiogenesis agent, bevacizumab, and several PARP inhibitors when employed in this clinical setting.

Wanna Get Away? Maintenance Treatments and Chemotherapy Holidays in Gynecologic Cancers

Epithelial ovarian cancer has a very high rate of relapse after primary therapy; historically approximately 70% of patients with a complete clinical response to surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy will relapse and die of the disease. Although this number has slowly improved, cure rates remain less than 50%. As such, maintenance therapy with the aim of preventing or delaying disease relapse and the goal of improving overall survival has been the subject of intense study. Numerous earlier studies with agents ranging from radioactive phosphorus to extended frontline therapy or to monthly taxol administration demonstrated encouraging improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) only to find, disappointingly, no benefit in overall survival. In addition, the PFS advantage of maintenance therapy was associated with disconcerting side effects such that maintenance therapy was not adapted as standard of care. Studies with bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors have demonstrated a PFS advantage with a manageable side-effect profile. However, an overall survival advantage remains unclear, and the use of these approaches thus remains controversial. Furthermore, in recurrent disease, the length of chemotherapy and benefits of extended chemotherapy is unclear. Thus, additional trials assessing maintenance strategies in ovarian and other gynecologic malignancies are needed.

Does adjuvant chemotherapy dose modification have an impact on the outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose modification (dose adjustment or treatment delay), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) who receive carboplatin and paclitaxel.

METHODS

Women with stages III and IV EOC and PPC treated on the Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III trial, protocol 182, who completed eight cycles of carboplatin with paclitaxel were evaluated in this study. The patients were grouped per dose modification and use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The primary end point was OS; Hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS were calculated for patients who completed eight cycles of chemotherapy. Patients without dose modification were the referent group. All statistical analyses were performed using the R programming language and environment.

RESULTS

A total of 738 patients were included in this study; 229 (31%) required dose modification, 509 did not. The two groups were well-balanced for demographic and prognostic factors. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for disease progression and death among dose-modified patients were: 1.43 (95% CI, 1.19-1.72, P < 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04-1.54, P = 0.021), respectively. Use of G-CSF was more frequent in dose-modified patients with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.63 (95% CI: 2.51-5.26, P < 0.001) compared to dose-unmodified patients.

CONCLUSION

Dose-modified patients were at a higher risk of disease progression and death. The need for chemotherapy dose modification may identify patients at greater risk for adverse outcomes in advanced stage EOC and PPC.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is mostly diagnosed at advanced stage. Better survival is achieved through complete debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Historically, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been introduced for unresectable disease to decrease tumor load and perform a unique complete surgery. Four randomized control trials have compared primary debulking surgery to NAC, but there is still controversy about the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and questions about its modalities. Areas covered: We made a review of knowledge on benefits of NAC compared to primary debulking chemotherapy, in terms of survival and morbidity, methods of administration, new drugs in early and late phase trials, the selection of patients. Similar survival was observed after NAC and interval debulking surgery or primary debulking surgery. Morbidity of surgery was decreased after interval debulking compared primary debulking surgery. Conventional drugs are carboplatin and paclitaxel. Safety of bevacizumab was evaluated in phase 2 trials associated with conventional drugs. Immunotherapy trials are enrolling patients in phase 1 study. Expert commentary: NAC followed by debulking surgery is the best treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemotherapy cycle number: A national multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

Six cycles of consolidation chemotherapy have become the standard for ovarian cancer treatment regimen following primary cytoreduction, yet with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), only 3 consolidation cycles are used. This study examines the effects of number of chemotherapy cycles in women with ovarian cancer that are being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, we examined the effect of number of cycles on survival on consolidation and total chemotherapy.

METHODS

All patients with stage IIIC and IV high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) were identified at 4 major Canadian cancer centers treated with NAC. A retrospective chart review was conducted using the medical charts and registry databases.

RESULTS

403 NAC patients were identified. 47% had zero residual disease. Chemotherapy cycles were divided into <3cycles or ≥4cycles for NAC and consolidation treatments and analyzed with multivariate analysis. 139/403 (34.5%) received ≥4cycles of NAC and had a worse prognosis than <3cycles (p=0.011). 70/403 (17.4%) received ≥4cycles of consolidation treatment and there was no difference in survival (p=0.33) CONCLUSION: Women with advanced HGSC are managed with a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. This is a study of a homogenous cohort of patients with stage IIIC or IV high grade serous cancers who received NAC. ≥4cycles of NAC had a worse outcome than <3cycles likely due to poor prognostic factors or poor response. The number of consolidation cycles did not appear to make a difference in overall survival.

Continuous Low-Dose Oral Cyclophosphamide and Methotrexate as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma After Complete Clinical Response to Platinum and Paclitaxel Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of continuous, low dose of oral, metronomic chemotherapy as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma after complete clinical response to platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this nonrandomized study, patients older than 18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than 2, with advanced ovarian carcinoma after complete clinical response to platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy were enrolled in 2 arms--arm A (maintenance arm), treated with continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and methotrexate 2.5 mg, and arm B (observation arm). Both arms were followed up for progression-free survival and toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were accrued in each arm from January 2009 to December 2010 in Ain Shams University Hospitals, where they received the treatment and followed up for disease progression and toxicity. Patients had a median age of 53 years in maintenance arm and 52.5 years in the observational arm, respectively. Over 80% had papillary serous adenocarcinoma, and over 40% of them had a stage IV disease in both arms. After median follow-up of 27 months, patients achieved median progression-free survival of 18 months in maintenance arm (A) and 15.5 months in observational arm (B), respectively. Toxicity profile was excellent with no grade 3 or 4 toxicity reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Current study may provide an evidence of efficacy and tolerability of continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide and methotrexate as a maintenance therapy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma after complete clinical response to platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy.

Optimal duration of a first-line palliative chemotherapy in disseminated colorectal cancer - a review of the literature from a developing country perspective

We still do not know whether the presently used protocol of the first-line palliative treatment of disseminated colorectal cancer (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI protocol) allows maximization of therapeutic response and minimization of side effects. No-one has verified whether continuation of the first-line chemotherapy despite the lack of progression is reflected by improved prognosis or significant risk of toxicity. This issue is of vital importance in the case of developing countries where targeted therapies are not available due to financial shortages. We have identified three potential strategies of the palliative therapy of disseminated colorectal cancer: 1) discontinuation of chemotherapy after a fixed number of cycles with its restart on progression (stop-and-go strategy), 2) intermittent protocol of chemotherapy, and 3) continuation of chemotherapy with discontinuation of the most toxic agent. None of the studies proved the superiority of the most commonly used standard, i.e. 12 cycles of the FOLFOX or FOLFIRI regimen. Although longer duration of this treatment may be associated with higher response rates and longer progression-free survival, these improvements frequently prove insignificant on statistical analysis.

The Potential Benefit of Three vs. Six Cycles of Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Vincristine in Postenucleation High-Risk Patients with IRSS Stage I Retinoblastoma

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical effects of different cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine (CEV) regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy in postenucleation high-risk patients with IRSS Stage I retinoblastoma (RB).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 53 RB patients hospitalized in the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University was performed. All patients had unilateral involvement, received enucleation treatment, were diagnosed as RB by pathology, and had high-risk pathological factors. Patients either refused postoperative chemotherapy or received three or six cycles of CEV regimen chemotherapy. The clinical information, treatment, and results of patients in all groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 19 cases refused postenucleation chemotherapy, 18 cases received three cycles, and 16 cases received six cycles of the CEV regimen chemotherapy. The 5-year disease-free survival rate and the overall survival (OS) rate in the chemotherapy group were higher than those in the non-chemotherapy group (97.1% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.001) and were not different between the three-cycle chemotherapy group and the six-cycle chemotherapy group (94.4% vs. 100%, p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

After eye enucleation for patients with high-risk unilateral RB, the CEV regimen chemotherapy was associated with a higher survival rate. The three-cycle CEV regimen adjuvant chemotherapy was effective and is expected to replace the six-cycle CEV regimen chemotherapy.

Maintenance chemotherapy in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer

The fundamental goal of maintenance therapy of cancer is to extend a clinically meaningful survival endpoint (overall, symptom-free, progression-free) while at the same time not substantially interfering with a patient's quality of life. Several phase 3 randomized trials in ovarian cancer involving different anti-neoplastics (e.g., paclitaxel, anti-angiogenic agents, olaparib) have revealed an improvement in progression-free survival with generally acceptable side effect profiles, and as a result represent in appropriately selected patients a rational therapeutic strategy.

Long-term results of a randomised phase III trial of weekly versus three-weekly paclitaxel/platinum induction therapy followed by standard or extended three-weekly paclitaxel/platinum in European patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin might improve survival in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We compared efficacy of first-line weekly to three-weekly paclitaxel/cis- or carboplatin (PCw and PC3w) induction therapy, followed by either three or six PC3w cycles.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised phase III trial with 2×2 design, patients with FIGO stage IIb-IV EOC were randomised to six cycles PCw (paclitaxel 90mg/m(2), cisplatin 70mg/m(2) or carboplatin AUC 4) or three cycles PC3w (paclitaxel 175mg/m(2), cisplatin 75mg/m(2) or carboplatin AUC 6), followed by either three or six cycles PC3w. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were response rate (RR) and toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 267 eligible patients, 133 received PCw and 134 PC3w. The first 105 patients received cisplatin, after protocol amendment the subsequent 162 patients received carboplatin. Weekly cisplatin was less well tolerated than weekly carboplatin. All PC3w cycles were well tolerated. At the end of all treatments, RR was 90.8% with no differences between the treatment arms. After a follow-up of median 10.3years (range 7.1-14.8), median PFS was 18.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9-21.0) months for PCw and 16.4 (95% CI 13.5-19.2) months for PC3w (p=0.78). Median OS was 44.8 (95% CI 33.1-56.5) months for PCw and 41.1 (95% CI 34.4-47.7) months for PC3w (p=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no benefit in terms of OS, PFS or RR for a weekly regimen nor for extended chemotherapy as first-line treatment for EOC in European patients.

Maintenance therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer: from chemotherapy to targeted agents

Over the past years, although no increase in the cure rate for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients has been achieved, a slow prolongation in patients survival has been observed, thanks to the introduction of effective second line or salvage therapies. Attempts to disease chronicization seem therefore of value in this setting. A major effort has been pursued to establish the role of maintenance therapies for epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Although chemotherapy does not seem to have an effective role, promising results are coming from trials investigating maintenance targeted treatments, especially with antiangiogenic agents or PARP inhibitors for selected patients. The aim of this article is to review current evidences on maintenance therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer and put the results in perspective.

Investigational agents for epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer deaths and accounts for 4% of women's cancer diagnoses and 5% of all cancer mortalities. Despite the ability of current chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery to put patients in remission, most patients with advanced cancer will eventually relapse. Many advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer have been reported in the past several years and a historical background is provided. Attention will then turn to analogs of current chemotherapeutic agents, new cytotoxic drugs, targeted molecular therapy, intraperitoneal therapy and immunotherapy. This review will give a perspective on current drugs, potential agents and upcoming clinical trials.

Maintenance chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer accounts for about 90% of all cases of ovarian cancer. Debulking surgery and six courses of platinum-based chemotherapy results in complete clinical remission (CCR) in up to 75% of cases. However, 75% of the responders will relapse within a median time of 18 to 28 months and only 20% to 40% of women will survive beyond five years. It has been suggested that maintenance chemotherapy could assist in prolonging remission. To date, there has not been a systematic review on the impact of maintenance chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and toxicity of maintenance chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer and to evaluate the impact on quality of life (QoL).

SEARCH METHODS

In the original review we searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 1), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CBMdisc, CNKI and VIP (to May 2009). We collected information from ongoing trials, checked reference lists of published articles and consulted experts in the field. For this update, the searches were extended to October 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maintenance chemotherapy with no further intervention, maintenance radiotherapy or other maintenance therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality and extracted data. We analysed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and QoL data were extracted where present. All analyses were based on intention-to-treat (ITT) on the endpoint of survival. We also analysed data by subgroups of drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight trials (1644 women). When all chemotherapy regimens were combined, meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in three-, five- and 10-year OS or PFS. For five-year OS, the combined risk ratio (RR) was 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.10) and for the five-year PFS, the combined RR was 1.06 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.17). Results were very similar when trials of different regimens were analysed. Comparing chemotherapy with radiotherapy, only the RR for 10-year PFS in pathological complete remission (PCR) was in favour of whole abdominal radiotherapy 0.51 (95% CI 0.27 to 1.00), while three- and five-year OS rates have no significant difference between the two groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to suggest that the use of platinum agents, doxorubicin or paclitaxel used as maintenance chemotherapy is more effective than observation alone. Further investigations regarding the effect of paclitaxel used as maintenance chemotherapy are required.

Dose-dense chemotherapy improves mechanisms of antitumor immune response

Dose-dense (DD) regimens of combination chemotherapy may produce superior clinical outcomes, but the basis for these effects are not completely clear. In this study, we assessed whether a DD combinatorial regimen of low-dose cisplatin and paclitaxel produces superior immune-mediated efficacy when compared with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) regimen in treating platinum-resistant ovarian cancer as modeled in mice. Immune responses generated by the DD regimen were identified with regard to the immune cell subset responsible for the antitumor effects observed. The DD regimen was less toxic to the immune system, reduced immunosuppression by the tumor microenvironment, and triggered recruitment of macrophages and tumor-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses to tumors [as determined by interleukin (IL)-2 and IFN-γ secretion]. In this model, we found that the DD regimen exerted greater therapeutic effects than the MTD regimen, justifying its further clinical investigation. Fourteen patients with platinum-resistant relapse of ovarian cancer received DD chemotherapy consisting of weekly carboplatin (AUC2) and paclitaxel (60-80 mg/m(2)) as the third- or fourth-line treatment. Serum was collected over the course of treatment, and serial IFN-γ and IL-2 levels were used to determine CD8(+) T-cell activation. Of the four patients with disease control, three had serum levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ associated with cytotoxic CD8(+) T-cell activity. The therapeutic effect of the DD chemotherapy relied on the preservation of the immune system and the treatment-mediated promotion of tumor-specific immunity, especially the antitumor CD8(+) T-cell response. Because the DD regimen controlled drug-resistant disease through a novel immune mechanism, it may offer a fine strategy for salvage treatment.

Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women. In addition to diagnosis and staging, primary surgery is performed to achieve optimal cytoreduction (surgical efforts aimed at removing the bulk of the tumour) as the amount of residual tumour is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. An optimal outcome of cytoreductive surgery remains a subject of controversy to many practising gynae-oncologists. The Gynaecologic Oncology group (GOG) currently defines 'optimal' as having residual tumour nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter, with complete cytoreduction (microscopic disease) being the ideal surgical outcome. Although the size of residual tumour masses after surgery has been shown to be an important prognostic factor for advanced ovarian cancer, it is unclear whether it is the surgical procedure that is directly responsible for the superior outcome that is associated with less residual disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal primary cytoreductive surgery for women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (stages III and IV).To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between zero and 2 cm, on overall survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3) and the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to August 2010). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Retrospective data on residual disease from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective and retrospective observational studies which included a multivariate analysis of 100 or more adult women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no RCTs or prospective non-RCTs identified that were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgery when performed as a primary procedure in advanced stage ovarian cancer.We found 11 retrospective studies that included a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. Analyses showed the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction, where the residual disease was microscopic that is no visible disease, as overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly prolonged in these groups of women. PFS was not reported in all of the studies but was sufficiently documented to allow firm conclusions to be drawn.When we compared suboptimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction the survival estimates were attenuated but remained statistically significant in favour of the lower volume disease group There was no significant difference in OS and only a borderline difference in PFS when residual disease of > 2 cm and < 2 cm were compared (hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.31; and HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.61, P = 0.05 for OS and PFS respectively).There was a high risk of bias due to the retrospective nature of these studies where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection bias was still likely to be of particular concern.Adverse events, quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness were not reported by treatment arm or to a satisfactory level in any of the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

During primary surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer all attempts should be made to achieve complete cytoreduction. When this is not achievable, the surgical goal should be optimal (< 1 cm) residual disease. Due to the high risk of bias in the current evidence, randomised controlled trials should be performed to determine whether it is the surgical intervention or patient-related and disease-related factors that are associated with the improved survival in these groups of women. The findings of this review that women with residual disease < 1 cm still do better than women with residual disease > 1 cm should prompt the surgical community to retain this category and consider re-defining it as 'near optimal' cytoreduction, reserving the term 'suboptimal' cytoreduction to cases where the residual disease is > 1 cm (optimal/near optimal/suboptimal instead of complete/optimal/suboptimal).

Maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: Molecular basis and therapeutic approach

Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate among gynaecological tumours despite the fact that the majority of patients with advanced disease achieve complete remission after first-line surgery and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, disease recurrence occurs in the majority of patients and second-line treatments are not curative. Clearly, the persistence of dormant and drug-resistant cells after front-line treatments results in the inability to cure the disease. The identification of cancer-initiating cells or cancer stem cells as key players in the development of recurrence has opened up a novel field of research aimed at identifying additional innovative therapeutic approaches. Strategies of maintenance therapy to extend the survival of patients have been studied, but to date no overall survival benefit has been detected. Currently, numerous clinical trials have just been completed or are ongoing involving patients achieving a complete clinical response after first-line chemotherapy in order to evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival. At the 2010 ASCO meeting, the first positive results of a phase III clinical trial in this setting were presented: bevacizumab (15 mg/kg i.v. every 21 days) added to first-line chemotherapy and continued for an additional 15 cycles was found to prolong progression-free survival of 3.8 months in comparison to 6 cycles of chemotherapy alone or only 6 cycles of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. In addition, positive results were announced for a second phase III trial testing bevacizumab in the same setting, but at half dose. The final assessment of the overall clinical benefit and the approval of bevacizumab in maintenance therapy by regulatory agencies is expected to be positive, as are the final results of abagovomab phase III trial MIMOSA, another antibody-based therapy tested as a maintenance treatment for advanced ovarian cancer patients. Encouraging preliminary results confirming the safety profile and the immunogenic activity of abagovomab were presented at the last ASCO meeting. The final results are expected to be released in the first half of 2011.

First-line systemic treatment of ovarian cancer: a critical review of available evidence and expectations for future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a prevalent gynecologic malignancy whose prognosis in most cases remains poor despite advances in therapy. In this article, we critically review the available clinical evidence for the choice of first-line chemotherapy in EOC and discuss promising therapeutic strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last 25 years, first-line chemotherapy regimens and the indication of systemic treatment for early-stage disease have been better established. Significant progress has been made in the treatment of advanced EOC with the optimization of the carboplatin plus paclitaxel regimen and the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for selected patients. Targeted therapies may be approved for EOC in the near future and this would bring more specific treatments and improve outcomes for patients. Validated biomolecular signatures to better define prognosis and to predict response to therapeutic agents are still lacking.

SUMMARY

The standard first-line chemotherapy in EOC is based on the doublet carboplatin plus paclitaxel. It may be possible to improve the efficacy of treatment by means of a more intensive dose-dense regimen or by the intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapy. Significant improvements in the treatment of EOC are expected from the development of antiangiogenic and other targeted agents and from better patient selection.

Maintenance chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer accounts for about 90% of all cases of ovarian cancer. Debulking surgery and six courses of platinum-based chemotherapy results in complete clinical remission (CCR) in up to 75% of cases. However, 75% of the responders will relapse within a median time of 18 to 28 months and only 20% to 40% of women will survive beyond five years. It has been suggested that maintenance chemotherapy could assist in prolonging remission. To date, there has not been a systematic review on the impact of maintenance chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and toxicity of maintenance chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer and to evaluate the impact on quality of life (QoL).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Specialized Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library Issue1, 2009), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CBMdisc, CNKI and VIP (to May 2009). We collected information from ongoing trials, checked reference lists of published articles and consulted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maintenance chemotherapy with no further intervention, maintenance radiotherapy or other maintenance therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality and extracted data. We analysed overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and QoL data were extracted where present. All analyses were based on intention to treat (ITT) on the endpoint of survival. We also analysed data by subgroups of drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six trials(902 women). When all chemotherapy regimens were combined, meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in 3, 5 and 10-year OS or PFS. For 5-year OS, the combined relative risk (RR) was 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.27) and for the 5-year PFS the combined RR was 1.18 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.58). Results were very similar when trials of different regimens were analysed. Comparing chemotherapy with radiotherapy, only the RR for 10-year PFS in pathological complete remission was in favour of whole abdominal radiotherapy 0.51 (95% CI 0.27 to 1.00), while 3 and 5-year OS rates have no significant difference between the two groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to suggest that the use of platinum agents or doxorubicin used as maintenance chemotherapy is more effective than observation alone. Further investigations regarding the effect of paclitaxel used as maintenance chemotherapy are required.

Current status of maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer

Even after countered with and responding to maximal surgical and chemotherapy efforts, advanced ovarian cancer usually ultimately recurs. One strategy employed to forestall recurrence is maintenance chemotherapy, an extension of treatment following a complete response to conventional measures. Many agents have been studied and many more are currently under investigation in maintenance regimens. While phase III data suggest that taxane maintenance prolongs progression-free survival, no overall survival benefit has been established. This article reviews the current status of maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer, including phase III evidence and new and upcoming trials.

Ovarian cancer

The standard initial management of epithelial ovarian cancer consists of surgical staging, operative tumour debulking including total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and administration of six cycles of intravenous chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Extensive and largely retrospective experience has shown that optimum surgical debulking to leave residual tumour deposits that are less than 1 cm in size is associated with improved patient outcomes. However, 75% of patients present with advanced (stage III or IV) disease and, although more than 80% of these women benefit from first-line therapy, tumour recurrence occurs in almost all these patients at a median of 15 months from diagnosis. Second-line treatments can improve survival and quality of life but are not curative. Advances in screening and understanding of molecular pathogenesis of ovarian cancer and development of novel targeted therapies (eg, bevacizumab) and practical intraperitoneal techniques for drug delivery are most likely to improve patient outcomes.

The optimal debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: proposal based on interval look during upfront surgery setting treatment

OBJECTIVE

The optimal goal of interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains undefined. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal goal of IDS following NAC on the basis of long-term survival by the disease status at the end of interval look surgery (ILS) or IDS during the treatment in the setting of upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS).

METHODS

From January 1986 through December 2000, we performed treatment in the setting of upfront PDS in 128 patients with Stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Sixty-six patients with residual disease (RD) at PDS underwent interval surgery (IS) such as ILS or IDS; 4 patients after two cycles of chemotherapy and 62 after three or more cycles. We investigated how disease status at the end of IS was associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rates for no, minimal and gross RD were not available (n = 0), 67% (n = 3) and 0% (n = 1) after two cycles, and 47% (n = 42), 0% (n = 18) and 0% (n = 2) after three or more cycles, respectively. No visible tumors at the end of IS after three or more cycles of chemotherapy were necessary for 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

If the optimal goal of IDS is defined as the surgery that is expected to result in long-term survival in the NAC setting treatment, our data on the assessment of peritoneal findings during the upfront PDS setting treatment suggest that only complete resection with no RD could be the optimal goal of IDS in the NAC setting treatment.

Phase III Trial of Observation Versus Six Courses of Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Six Courses of Paclitaxel/Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: Final Results of the After-6 Protocol 1

Purpose

To assess whether six courses of paclitaxel are effective as consolidation treatment in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who are in complete response after first-line paclitaxel/platinum–based chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Patients with stages IIb to IV disease in clinical or pathologic complete response after six courses of paclitaxel/platinum–based chemotherapy were randomly allocated to either observation (ie, control) or six courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (ie, maintenance).

Results

Two hundred patients were randomly assigned from March 1999 to July 2006. Because of the low accrual rate, an unplanned interim analysis of futility according to the Bayesian approach was performed. Grade 2 or greater motor neurotoxicity and sensory neurotoxicity were reported in 11.3% and 28.0% of the paclitaxel-arm patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 43.5 months, 107 patients (53%) had experienced relapse, and 48 patients (24%) had died. Two-year progression-free survival rates were 54% (95% CI, 43% to 64%) and 59% (95% CI, 49% to 69%; P = not significant) in the control and maintenance arms, respectively. Corresponding 2-year overall survival rates were 90% (95% CI, 84% to 97%) and 87% (95% CI, 80% to 94%; P = not significant), respectively. The Cox model showed that residual disease after initial surgery (macroscopic v no macroscopic residuum; hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; 95%CI, 1.21 to 3.03) and stage (IIIc to IV v others; HR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.13 to 8.48) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival, whereas the treatment arm (maintenance v control) had no prognostic relevance.

Conclusion

A consolidation treatment with six cycles of paclitaxel does not prolong progression-free survival or overall survival in patients in complete response after first-line paclitaxel/platinum–based regimens.

A review of the current evidence for maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian cancer (OC) typically is diagnosed at advanced stages, in which the primary goal of therapy is to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In recent years, maintenance therapy has been tested for this purpose in advanced OC (AOC). Literature on maintenance therapy in AOC was systematically reviewed to assess current knowledge regarding the impact of this therapeutic approach.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed 2/2009 for articles published 1/2001-1/2009 pertaining to OC maintenance therapy guidelines, patterns, and outcomes. A second search used keywords specific to maintenance and included primary studies published in the last 10 years. Of 406 sources identified, 36 primary studies and 16 review articles were included in this systematic review. A third search used the keyword "consolidation" to find maintenance articles not identified through other searches; of 48 additional sources, 13 primary studies and 6 reviews were included. A fourth search of non-MEDLINE-indexed sources yielded 14 additional relevant publications from the same time period.

RESULTS

Among practice guidelines identified, only the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2008 guidelines provide recommendations regarding maintenance therapy, assigning it a category 2B recommendation. No studies were identified that reported current treatment patterns or economic outcomes in maintenance therapy; quality of life data were reported in one study. A variety of agents have been tested for maintenance, with paclitaxel the most commonly evaluated. The Southwest Oncology Group-Gynecologic Oncology Group 178 trial has found that 12 cycles of paclitaxel extend PFS (by 7 months) compared to 3 months paclitaxel, but could not adequately evaluate OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance therapy may improve clinical outcomes in AOC, but additional research is needed to demonstrate an OS advantage. Future studies should investigate the long-term clinical benefit of maintenance treatment and its impact on resource utilization and health-related quality of life.

Impact on survival of 12 versus 3 monthly cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) administered to patients with advanced ovarian cancer who attained a complete response to primary platinum-paclitaxel: follow-up of a Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic Oncology Group phase 3 trial

OBJECTIVES

A SWOG/GOG phase 3 trial exploring the impact of 12-monthly cycles of paclitaxel given to patients with advanced ovarian cancer who achieved a complete response to primary chemotherapy was discontinued by the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee when a prospectively defined interim analysis revealed a highly statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). At study closure, it was too early to assess the impact on overall survival.

METHODS

Patients (n=296) received either 3 or 12 monthly cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 3 h).

RESULTS

Of the 146 patients on the 3-cycle arm, 9 (6%) received >3 cycles. Median (12 versus 3 cycles; intention-to-treat analysis) updated PFS (all pts) 22 versus 14 months, p=0.006; overall survival (all pts) 53 versus 48 months, p=0.34.

CONCLUSION

Twelve cycles of single agent maintenance paclitaxel significantly improves PFS. Explanations for the lack of a favorable influence on overall survival include: (a) treatment at relapse equalized outcome; (b) the sample size was insufficient to reveal a difference; (c) "crossover" of patients from 3 cycles to longer treatment masked a potential difference. An ongoing phase 3 trial will hopefully provide a definitive answer to the question of the impact of this maintenance strategy on overall survival.

Management of women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancers in the United States. Initial management is reviewed here and is best provided by a multidisciplinary team, including a gynecologic oncologist and a medical oncologist. Typically these patients are first treated with aggressive surgical debulking, followed by chemotherapy. Exceptions to this strategy, including those for patients adequately treated with surgery alone and those better served by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), are discussed. The history and rationale of current chemotherapy regimens, both intravenous (IV) and intraperitoneal (IP), are reviewed. Given the chemo-sensitive nature of this disease, as well as the fact that it remains largely incurable in advanced stages, efforts continue to be made to improve initial therapy. This disease represents an excellent target for new drug development, and some of the newer agents in trials for ovarian cancer are discussed.

Whole abdomen irradiation in epithelial ovarian cancer: A single institution study

Background: The examination of the use of whole abdomen irradiation open field technique in optimally debulked patients with no residual disease with epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: Between 1993 and 2007, 20 patients with optimally cytoreduced epithelial OC were treated with WAI. The stage distribution was stage I in 15 patients, stage II in 1, and stage III in 4. The grade distribution was grade 1 in 10 patients, grade 2 in 4, and grade 3 in 6. WAI consisted of 30 Gy, delivered in daily fractions, mainly of 1.5 Gy (95%), 5 days/weekly, in 14 patients. After abdominal irradiation, in 75% of the patients a pelvic boost, and in 7 a boost to other risk sites was given to reach 45 - 50 Gy. Nine patients received platinum based chemotherapy (CT). Median follow-up was 7.96 years. Results: The overall survival (OS) rate was 82% and 70% at 5 and 10 years. A tendency to better survival was found in patients with age ? 40 than in those with > 40 years (100%:100% vs. 68%:51%; p=0.03). Patients with grade 1-2 tumors had significantly better 5- and 10-year survival rate than those with grade 3 tumors (100%:100% vs. 40%:20%; p<0.00). The 5- and 10-year OS for the patients 'with' and 'without' a pelvic boost turned to be in favor of the patients 'with' the boost (91%:91% vs. 60%:40%; p=0.02). In 15 patients (75%) RT was transiently interrupted because of acute gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity. Neither grade 4 acute complications nor was mortality observed. Late gastrointestinal effect developed in 1 patient, presented with grade 4 complications. The development of second primary malignancy was not observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion: WAI achieves a quite favorable 5- and 10-year survival rate with an acceptable risk of acute and late side effects in properly selected patients with epithelial OC.

Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status

Over recent decades, truly impressive progress has been made in the outcome associated with the pharmacological antineoplastic management of women with advanced ovarian cancer. Following initial surgery, the large majority of patients with this malignancy will receive a chemotherapy regimen that includes a platinum drug (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Currently, objective responses are observed in approximately 60-80% of patients treated in the front-line setting, with documented improvements in overall survival compared with prior non-platinum and taxane programmes. Unfortunately, despite the high response rate to initial chemotherapy, the majority of women with advanced disease will experience recurrence of the malignant process and be candidates for a variety of possible second-line therapeutic options. It is well recognized that ovarian cancer patients who are documented to experience an initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy but where the disease recurs approximately 6 or more months following the completion of primary therapy, may have another clinically meaningful response (both objective and subjective) to a second platinum-based strategy. However, an optimal management approach in this setting remains to be defined. Furthermore, the malignant cell populations in all ovarian cancer patients who experience an initial relapse of the disease process will eventually be resistant to the platinum agents. In this setting, multiple drugs have been shown to be biologically active. Again, an optimal strategy to be employed in the platinum-resistant setting has yet to be demonstrated through the conduct of evidence-based trials. Reasonable goals of therapy in women with recurrent or resistant ovarian cancer are to improve overall survival, reduce the severity (and delay the occurrence) of symptoms and optimize overall quality of life.

Antineoplastic agents in the management of ovarian cancer: current status and emerging therapeutic strategies

The intent of this review is to critically examine the status of the current chemotherapeutic management of ovarian cancer and possible future directions. Standard systemic chemotherapy includes a platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel), a strategy that has not changed in more than a decade. Phase-III-trial data have revealed the superior efficacy of intraperitoneal cisplatin, compared with systemic platinum delivery, in small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer, but in general this approach is associated with greater toxicity. Several regimens have been shown to be active in recurrent and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, but an optimal management strategy has not been defined. Although 'targeted therapeutic approaches' are currently being explored in this disease, with the important exception of anti-angiogeneic agents, to date, limited biological and clinical activity have been demonstrated.

Maintenance chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: the US experience

The somewhat controversial results of a Southwest Oncology Group/Gynecologic Oncology Group phase 3 randomized trial have revealed that a maintenance strategy consisting of 12 cycles of single-agent paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 h every 28 days), delivered to women with advanced ovarian cancer who have achieved a clinically defined complete response to primary platinum–paclitaxel chemotherapy, significantly improves progression-free survival compared to delivery of three cycles of the same treatment regimen. While it is not possible to provide a definitive statement regarding the impact of this management approach on overall survival, in an exploratory analysis, patients who initiated this study with a baseline CA-125 level ≤10 units/mL and were treated with the 12-cycle maintenance program experienced a statistically significant improvement in survival. An ongoing Gynecologic Oncology Group trial in the United States will hopefully provide a definitive answer to the question of the impact of this novel strategy on outcome in ovarian cancer.

Improved Survival with Single-Agent Paclitaxel Consolidation/Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Consolidation/maintenance therapy in the standard management of ovarian cancer remains controversial, primarily due to the unknown impact of this strategy on overall survival.

METHODS

We examined the survival of a previously reported patient population consecutively treated with either 3 cycles (group A; n = 13 patients) or 12 cycles (group B; n = 13) of single-agent paclitaxel consolidation following 6 cycles of primary induction chemotherapy comprising 6 cycles of carboplatin (AUC = 5), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the 2 patient populations regarding known relevant prognostic factors (age, stage, tumor grade). The median progression-free survival was 11 months for group A and 24 months for group B (p = 0.0062). The median overall survival in group A was 38 months and was not reached in group B (p = 0.0019). Current follow-up for these 2 patient groups exceeds 43 months.

CONCLUSION

We recognize the important limitations of this study, particularly its sample size and nonrandomized nature. However, these data provide support for the conclusion that paclitaxel 'maintenance/consolidation' therapy may favorably impact overall and progression-free survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients who achieve an excellent response to primary platinum-based chemotherapy.

Maintenance or consolidation therapy in advanced ovarian cancer

Most patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) achieve a clinical complete response (CR) or have no clinical evidence of disease after aggressive cytoreductive surgery and 6 cycles of platinum-/taxane-based chemotherapy. From the reported randomized trials using different durations or different cycles of chemotherapy, none of these showed improvement in survival beyond 6 cycles. Data from the literature do not support a relationship between the number of cycles and response or between the cumulative dose and response. In addition, no benefit in survival was detected with high-dose and intensity chemotherapy administered for a short time compared with standard-dose chemotherapy given for a longer time. However, statistically significant differences in progression-free survival were found in patients who achieved a clinically defined CR to a platinum (CDDP)-/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and who continued single-agent paclitaxel for an extended time period. Notably, this randomized trial most likely did not offer any survival advantage, as it was closed prematurely by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee in accordance with the guidelines planned for interim analysis of primary end-points.

The role of maintenance therapy and novel taxanes in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Despite several studies reporting various degrees of success, the role of maintenance chemotherapy in ovarian cancer remains controversial. This article reviews the available data and the controversy surrounding maintenance therapy. In addition, the role of novel taxanes, which may offer an improved therapeutic index and reduced toxicity relative to conventional therapies in this setting, is discussed.

METHODS

The available randomized clinical data on extended or maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer are reviewed.

RESULTS

Available data indicate that patients with ovarian cancer undergoing taxane maintenance chemotherapy exhibit a reduced recurrence rate and a longer progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

While an additional randomized trial is needed to confirm these benefits and establish maintenance therapy as the standard of care, the authors conclude that maintenance therapy is a valuable option that should be discussed with patients until further data are available. The Gynecologic Oncology Group 212 trial is a randomized clinical trial that is designed to answer whether taxane maintenance therapy offers a survival advantage as well as to determine the impact of such a therapeutic regimen on a patient's quality of life. This trial is also designed to address some of the questions regarding the role of a novel taxane in maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer.

A pilot study of three-cycle consolidation chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with clinical complete response after paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three additional cycles of paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with clinical complete response (CR). Patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer stages II-IV with clinical CR after primary surgery and six cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel/platinum entered into the study. Three cycles of paclitaxel/platinum (cisplatin, carboplatin) were administered as a consolidation chemotherapy only in patients who agreed to the informed consent. Patients without further treatment served as controls. A total of 81 patients entered into the study. According to the informed consent, 42 patients were treated by the consolidation chemotherapy, and 39 patients were followed up without further treatment. The median actuarial disease-free survival for the patients with and without consolidation chemotherapy was 25.0 months and 26.0 months, respectively (P= 0.80). The median overall survival is not reached. World Health Organization grade 3-4 toxicities in the consolidation arm were increased but showed no significant differences statistically. Although the sample size is small and not randomized, these results suggest that three cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with paclitaxel/platinum might not provide a favorable outcome in patients with a clinical CR.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Consolidation Therapy after Platinum/Paclitaxel‐Based Chemotherapy for Suboptimally Debulked, Advanced‐Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) as a consolidation therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have attained a clinically defined complete response to initial platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with suboptimally debulked stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer who attained a clinically defined complete response at the completion of platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible for this protocol. Patients were treated with PLD at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) every 28 days for four cycles. A survival analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients enrolled, 29 were evaluable. Twenty-three patients (79%) completed all four cycles of consolidation therapy. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was the most common toxicity. Six patients remained clinically without evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 35 months from the completion of primary chemotherapy. The median progression-free interval was 15 months, and median overall survival time was 31 months, with 47% of patients achieving a 4-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Consolidation therapy with PLD chemotherapy administered to women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after initial chemotherapy appears feasible based on its toxicity profile. Considering the tolerability of this agent, further investigation is needed to depict the optimal dose and schedule needed for consolidation therapy.

Consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer: where do we stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of consolidation chemotherapy in ovarian cancer is to maximize the benefit of primary therapy and improve progression-free and overall survival. Consolidation has been tested with multiple treatment modalities including cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation and biological therapies. A review of recently published clinical trials is presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consolidation therapy is not a new concept. More than 30 clinical trials utilizing consolidation therapy have been published in the last two decades. The natural history of many patients who participate in consolidation trials is often favorable, making the effect of consolidation treatments difficult to interpret. Small phase II studies have suggested improved outcomes compared with historical controls, but randomized trials have yet to show a distinct survival advantage with consolidation therapy.

SUMMARY

The role of consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer is evolving. Although it is recognized that ovarian cancer patients commonly suffer recurrences after initial response, it is not clear that current therapies alter this course. Future clinical designs should include appropriate control groups. Novel therapies should be studied in randomized controlled trials with sufficient power to detect relevant clinical differences, the most important being overall survival. Toxicity and ease of administration must be considered against the benefits of therapy.

Two for good measure: six versus eight cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although the standard of care for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is six cycles (6C) of platinum-taxane (PT), there have been no studies on the optimal duration of treatment in the era of adjuvant taxanes. At our center, some women receive eight cycles (8C) of PT, based on physician judgment. We were interested in evaluating the outcomes of women treated with 8C of PT for EOC as compared to a cohort who received 6C.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified women with Stage III or IV EOC between 1998 and 2003 who received 6C or 8C of PT. The endpoints were disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). CA-125 response was defined as a decrease in CA-125 of 50% in four serial samples or of 75% over three samples.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two women met criteria for inclusion; 84 received 6C, and 38 received 8C. Comparing the cohorts receiving 6C versus 8C, 71% versus 26% were optimally debulked (P < 0.01). 79 patients were evaluable by CA-125 (52 6C/27 8C), and all responded. 88% receiving 6C and 81% receiving 8C normalized their CA-125 at end of treatment (P = 0.20). The proportion with a normal CA-125 at Cycle 2 was 29% versus 12%, respectively (P = 0.15) and, at Cycle 4, was 88% versus 36%, respectively (P < 0.01). DFS was 13 months with 6C and 8 months with 8C (P = 0.01). OS was 31 versus 23.5 months (P = 0.02), respectively. When the survival analysis is restricted to suboptimal debulked patients only, the DFS is 12.5 versus 8 months (P = 0.02), and OS is 32 versus 26.5 months (P = 0.15), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Two further cycles of PT did not improve DFS or OS for patients with advanced EOC. Patients who do not achieve remission after 6C are unlikely to benefit from additional chemotherapy using the same agents and should be considered for clinical trials involving novel agents with different mechanisms of action.