Effect of stress on brain histamine

Stimulation of central histaminergic transmission attenuates diazepam-induced motor disturbance on rota-rod and beam walking tests in mice

Diazepam administration has been shown to influence the release of histamine in various brain areas involved in motor behavior. Therefore, the present study explored the plausible regulatory role of the central histaminergic system in diazepam-induced deficits in motor performance in mice using the rota-rod and beam walking tests. In this study, several doses of diazepam (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mg/kg, i.p.) were assessed in mice for changes in motor performance on the rota-rod and beam walking test. In addition, the brain histamine levels were determined after diazepam administration, and the diazepam-induced motor deficits were assessed in mice, pretreated centrally (intracerebroventricular) with histaminergic agents such as histamine (0.1, 10 µg), histamine precursor (L-histidine: 0.1, 2.5 µg), histamine neuronal releaser/H 3 receptor antagonist (thioperamide: 0.5, 10 µg), H 1 and H 2 receptor agonist [2-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl) histamine (FMPH: 0.1, 6.5 µg; amthamine: 0.1, 5 µg)/antagonist (H 1 : cetirizine 0.1 µg) and (H 2 : ranitidine: 50 µg)]. Results indicate that mice treated with diazepam at doses 1, 2 mg/kg, i.p. significantly increased the brain histamine levels. Moreover, in mice pretreated with histaminergic transmission-enhancing agents, the diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced motor incoordination was significantly reversed. Contrastingly, diazepam (1 mg/kg, i.p.) in its subeffective dose produced significant motor deficits in mice preintracerebroventricular injected with histamine H 1 and H 2 receptor antagonists on both the employed tests. Therefore, it is postulated that endogenous histamine operates via H 1 and H 2 receptor activation to alleviate the motor-impairing effects of diazepam.

Hypertensive response to stress: the role of histaminergic H1 and H2 receptors in the medial amygdala

Different brain areas seem to be involved in the cardiovascular responses to stress. The medial amygdala (MeA) has been shown to participate in cardiovascular control, and acute stress activates the MeA to a greater extent than any of the other amygdaloid structures. It has been demonstrated that the brain histaminergic system may be involved in behavioral, autonomic and neuroendocrine responses to stressful situations. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the histaminergic receptors H1 and H2 in cardiovascular responses to acute restraint stress. Wistar rats (280-320g) received bilateral injections of cimetidine, mepyramine or saline into the MeA and were submitted to 45min of restraint stress. Mepyramine microinjections at doses of 200, 100 and 50nmol promoted a dose-dependent blockade of the hypertensive response induced by the restraint stress. Cimetidine (200 and 100nmol) promoted a partial blockade of the hypertensive response to stress only at the highest dose administered. Neither drugs altered the typical stress-evoked tachycardiac responses. Furthermore, mepyramine and cimetidine were unable to modify the mean arterial pressure or heart rate of freely moving rats under basal conditions (non-stressed rats). The data suggest that in the MeA the histaminergic H1 receptors appear to be more important than H2 receptors in the hypertensive response to stress. Furthermore, there appears to be no histaminergic tonus in the MeA controlling blood pressure during non-stress conditions.

Anti-stress effects of carnosine on restraint-evoked immunocompromise in mice through spleen lymphocyte number maintenance

Carnosine (β-alanyl-L-histidine), a naturally occurring dipeptide, has been characterized as a putative neurotransmitter and serves as a reservoir for brain histamine, which could act on histaminergic neurons system to relieve stress-induced damages. However, understanding of the role of carnosine in stress-evoked immunocompromise is limited. In this study, results showed that when mice were subjected to restraint stress, spleen index and the number of spleen lymphocytes including Natural Killer (NK) cells were obviously decreased. Results also demonstrated that restraint stress decreased the cytotoxic activity of NK cells per spleen (LU₁₀/spleen) while the activity of a single NK cell (LU₁₀/10⁶ cells) was not changed. However, oral administration of carnosine (150 and 300 mg/kg) increased spleen index and number of spleen lymphocytes (including NK cells), and elevated the cytotoxic activity of NK cells per spleen in restraint-stressed mice. These results indicated that carnosine ameliorated stress-evoked immunocompromise through spleen lymphocyte number maintenance. Carnosine was further found to reduce stress-induced elevation of plasma corticosterone level. On the other hand, results showed that carnosine and RU486 (a glucocorticoids receptor antagonist) treatment prevented the reduction in mitochondrion membrane potential and the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c into cytoplasm, increased Bcl-2/Bax mRNA ratio, as well as decreased terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells in spleen lymphocytes of stressed mice. The results above suggested that the maintenance of spleen lymphocyte number by carnosine was related with the inhibition of lymphocytes apoptosis caused by glucocorticoids overflow. The stimulation of lymphocyte proliferation by carnosine also contributed to the maintenance of spleen lymphocyte number in stressed mice. In view of the elevated histamine level, the anti-stress effects of carnosine on restraint-evoked immunocompromise might be via carnosine-histamine metabolic pathway. Taken together, carnosine maintained spleen lymphocyte number by inhibiting lymphocyte apoptosis and stimulating lymphocyte proliferation, thus prevented immunocompromise in restraint-stressed mice.

Time-course of cerebrospinal fluid histamine in the wake-consolidated squirrel monkey

Central nervous system (CNS) histamine is low in individuals with narcolepsy, a disease characterized by severe fragmentation of both sleep and wake. We have developed a primate model, the squirrel monkey, with which we can examine the role of the CNS in the wake-consolidation process, as these primates are day-active, have consolidated wake and sleep and have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that is readily accessible. Using this model and three distinct protocols, we report herein on the role of CNS histamine in the wake consolidation process. CSF histamine has a robust daily rhythm, with a mean of 24.9 ± 3.29 pg mL(-1) , amplitude of 31.7 ± 6.46 pg mL(-1) and a peak at 17:49 ± 70.3 min (lights on 07:00-19:00 hours). These levels are not significantly affected by increases (up to 161 ± 40.4% of baseline) or decreases (up to 17.2 ± 2.50% of baseline) in locomotion. In direct contrast to the effects of sleep deprivation in non-wake-consolidating mammals, in whom CSF histamine increases, pharmacologically induced sleep (γ-hydroxybutyrate) and wake (modafinil) have no direct effects on CSF histamine concentrations. These data indicate that the time-course of histamine in CSF in the wake-consolidated squirrel monkey is robust against variation in activity and sleep and wake-promoting pharmacological compounds, and may indicate that histamine physiology plays a role in wake-consolidation such as is present in the squirrel monkey and humans.

The effects of histaminergic agents in the ventral hippocampus of rats in the plus-maze test of anxiety-like behaviours

It has been suggested that histamine have modulatory influence on anxiety-related behaviours both in animals and humans. Ventral hippocampus (VHC) may also be an important brain site in the modulation of fear or anxiety. In the present study, the effects of histaminergic agents on anxiety-related behaviours in the rats, using plus-maze test has been investigated. Intra-VHC administration of histamine (2.5, 5 and 7.5 microg/rat) decreased %OAT and %OAE but not locomotor activity, showing an anxiogenic response. Pretreatment of animals with either pyrilamine, a H1 receptor antagonist (10 microg/rat), or ranitidine, a H2 receptor antagonist (10 microg/rat) reverse anxiogenic response of histamine (2.5, 5 and 7.5 microg/rat). However, intra-VHC microinjection of higher doses of pyrilamine (40 microg/rat) or ranitidine (20 and 40 microg/rat) alone increased anxiety-like behaviours in rats. Our results showed that histamine may modulate anxiety-like behaviours via H1 and H2 receptors in the ventral hippocampus of the rats.

Intracerebroventricular effects of histaminergic agents on morphine-induced anxiolysis in the elevated plus-maze in rats

Some reports indicate that morphine can induce anxiolytic effects both in animal and in man. It has also been reported that histaminergic system can interfere with some pharmacological effects of morphine. The effects of histaminergic agents on morphine-induced anxiolysis in rats, using elevated plus-maze were investigated in the present study. Intraperitoneal injection of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg) induced antianxiety effects. Intracerebroventricular administration of histamine at the doses of (5, 10 and 20 microg/rat) also increased anxiety-related behaviours. Intracerebroventricular injection of pyrilamine, a H1 receptor antagonist (25, 50 and 100 microg/rat), increased anxiety whereas injection of ranitidine, a H2 receptor antagonist (5, 10 and 20 microg/rat) at the same site, decreased anxiety. Therefore, it seems that histamine induces anxiogenic response through activation of H2 receptors, while the response of H1 blocker may be due to release of histamine. We also evaluated the interactions between morphine and histaminergic agents. Our data show that histamine (10 microg/rat), pyrilamine (50 microg/rat) and ranitidine (5 microg/rat) did not alter the response induced by different doses of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg). Similarly, a single dose of morphine did not alter the response induced by different doses of histamine (5, 10 and 20 microg/rat), pyrilamine (25, 50 and 100 microg/rat) or ranitidine (5, 10 and 20 microg/rat). In conclusion, the histaminergic system plays an important role in the modulation of anxiety, although in our experiments, no interaction was found between the effects of histaminergic agents and morphine on anxiety-related indices in the elevated plus-maze. This may imply that morphine-induced anxiolysis probably is independent of the histaminergic system.

The effects of histaminergic agents in the central amygdala of rats in the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety

Reports indicate that histamine and histaminergic agents can change anxiety-related behaviours in both animals and humans. The amygdala is an important brain site in the modulation of fear or anxiety. In the present study, we investigated the effects of intracentral amygdala microinjection of histaminergic agents on anxiety-related behaviours in rats, using the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety. Intracentral amygdala administration of histamine (0.01-0.5 microg/0.5 microl bilateral) decreased %open armtime and % open arm entries, but not locomotor activity, showing an anxiogenic response. Intracentral amygdala microinjection of pyrilamine (H1 receptor antagonist) and ranitidine (H2 receptor antagonist) (both at 1-20 microg/0.5 microl bilateral) did not change anxiety-related parameters in our experiments. In another series of experiments, histamine (0.5 microg/0.5 microl bilateral) was coadministrated with pyrilamine and ranitidine (both at 1-20 mg/0.5 microl bilateral). The results showed that pyrilamine but not ranitidine could significantly reverse the anxiogenic effect of histamine at doses of 10 and 20 microg/0.5 microl bilateral. The results suggest that histamine may modulate anxiety via H1 but not H2 receptors in the rat central amygdala.

Mouse light/dark box test reveals anxiogenic-like effects by activation of histamine H1 receptors

Effects of substances that are able to alter the histamine level, a histamine H(1)-receptor agonist and antagonist, and a histamine H(2)-receptor agonist were investigated in an anxiety-like state in mice by means of the light/dark box test. Diazepam was used as positive control. The histamine H(3)-receptor antagonist, thioperamide (2, 5, and 20 mg/kg s.c.), showed an anxiogenic-like effect that reached a maximum with the dosage of 5 mg/kg. The histamine-N-methyltransferase (HMT) inhibitor, metoprine (5 and 20 mg/kg s.c.), also decreased the time in the light at the highest dose used and, likewise, the highly selective histamine H(1)-receptor agonist, 2-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)histamine (FMPH) (2.65 and 6.5 microg/mouse, i.c.v.). On the contrary, the histamine H(2)-receptor agonist, impromidine (3, 10, 20, and 30 microg/mouse, i.c.v.), dose-dependently showed an anxiolytic-like effect. The selective histamine H(1) antagonist, pyrilamine (20 mg/kg i.p.) was able to prevent the anxiogenic-like effect of FMPH significantly, and that of thioperamide partially, while the effect caused by metoprine remained unvaried. It is suggested that the histaminergic system modulates anxiety-like states via the activation of both postsynaptic receptors in a contrasting manner: activation of the H(1) receptor causes an anxiogenic-like effect, while that of the H(2) receptors reduces anxiousness. However, on the basis of effects observed with the substances capable of releasing endogenous histamine, it seems likely that the anxiogenic-like effect is prevalent.

The H1- and H2-histamine blockers chlorpheniramine and ranitidine applied to the nucleus basalis magnocellularis region modulate anxiety and reinforcement related processes

This study examined the effects of the H1-antagonist chlorpheniramine and the H2-antagonist ranitidine on reinforcement and anxiety-parameters following unilateral injection into the vicinity of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM). In Experiment 1, rats with chronically implanted cannulae were injected with chlorpheniramine or ranitidine (each at doses of 0.1, 1, 10 and 20 microg) and were placed into one of four restricted quadrants of a circular open field (closed corral) for a single conditioning trial. During the test for conditioned corral preference, when provided a choice between the four quadrants, only those rats injected with 10 or 20 microg chlorpheniramine spent more time in the treatment corral, indicative of a positively reinforcing action. None of the other doses of chlorpheniramine or of the H2-antagonist influenced rats' preference behavior. In Experiment 2, the elevated plus-maze (EPM) was used to gauge possible anxiolytic or anxiogenic effects of intra-basalis injection of chlorpheniramine or ranitidine (each at doses of 0.1, 1, 10 and 20 microg). A single injection of chlorpheniramine at 0.1 or 20 microg as well as ranitidine at 20 microg was found to exert anxiolytic-like effects in the EPM. Both compounds elevated the time spent on the open arms and increased scanning over the edge of an open arm. None of the other doses of the H1- and H2-antagonist influenced rats' behavior in the EPM. In sum, these findings show that H1- and H2-receptor antagonists differentially modulate reinforcement and fear-related processes in the NBM and thus, provide the first evidence for a behavioral relevance for the histaminergic innervation of this brain site.

Effects of different types of stress on histamine-H3 receptors in the rat cortex

The role of the histamine (HA) H3 receptor (estimated by binding of [3H]N-alpha-methyl HA in the brain cortex) in the response of male rats to four types of stress was evaluated: acute weak foot-shock stress (0.5 mA x 1 s x 5 times), acute intense foot-shock stress (1mA x 10 s x 5 times), acute restraint stress (60 min at 24 degrees C) and chronic variate stress. Two groups of rats received chronic treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant: amitriptyline (5 mg/kg i.p.); one group was also chronically stressed. HA-H3 receptor density rapidly decreased in acute intense foot-shock and chronic variate stress, but was unchanged in acute weak foot-shock and restraint stress. Amitripytline counteracted the chronic variate stress-induced decrease, and increased HA-H3 receptor density when chronically administered in the non-stressed control group. These results indicate that cortical HA-H3 receptor density is affected by the response to stress in function of the type, duration and intensity of the stressor.

Stress and brain histaminergic system: effects of weak electric foot-shock

A weak electric foot-shock stressful stimulus (0.5 mA x 1 s x 5 times) significantly increases plasma corticosterone (CS) levels and modifies [3H]-histamine ([3H]-HA) binding site constants related to H2 receptors in rat cortical membranes. Progressive and total recovery of basal binding characteristics occurs 90 min later. A double-foot-shock stress procedure delays [3H]-HA binding characteristic recovery instead of strengthening stress effects. This finding is further evidence of involvement of the brain's histamine receptors in the response to mild stress.

Role of histaminergic mechanisms in the regulation of some stress responses in rats

The involvement of histaminergic mechanisms in the regulation of some stress responses was studied in rats. The brain neuronal histamine (HA) depletor, alpha-fluoromethyl histidine (alpha-FMH), at doses (50 or 100 mg/kg) which markedly lower brain HA, significantly attenuated the gastric ulcer formation and the elevation in plasma corticosterone in response to cold restraint stress (CRS). alpha-FMH also appreciably reduced gastric mucosal HA content. The H1-antagonist, pheniramine (25 mg/kg), attenuated both the gastric mucosal and endocrine response to CRS, while the effects of the H2-antagonist, cimetidine (200 mg/kg), were on the plasma corticosterone levels. These results are discussed in light of complex HA-ergic mechanisms in the maintenance of physiological homeostasis during stress.

Brain histamine response to stress in 12 month old rats

The regional brain histamine regulation in response to stress was investigated in 12 month old Sprague-Dawley male rats. Air blast exposure (15 min) induced significant (26.5%) elevation in hypothalamic HA level; midbrain and cortical HA concentrations were not affected. Histamine methyltransferase activity was not altered by stress in any of the brain regions investigated. Plasma corticosterone levels of stressed rats were significantly elevated (6.5 fold). Hence, the response of hypothalamic HA to stress is still evident in 12 month old rats.

Brain histamine regulation following chronic diazepam treatment and stress

Chronic diazepam treatment (5 mg/kg intragastrically, twice daily for 14 days) did not influence either hypothalamic, midbrain or cortical histamine (HA) levels or histidine decarboxylase (HD) activity in male Sprague-Dawley (200-220 g) rats. However, a small but significant decrease in hypothalamic HA concentration and significantly increased HD activity was seen following diazepam withdrawal. Air blast stress induced a significant elevation in hypothalamic HA levels and HD activity in vehicle-treated controls, diazepam-treated and diazepam-withdrawn rats, but the change in HD activity was significantly greater in the last group. The latter group also displayed the greatest elevation in plasma corticosterone levels in response to stress. Hence, diazepam withdrawal in rats results in some changes in the basal hypothalamic HA regulation and may influence the hypothalamic HA and corticosterone response to stress.

Age-related changes in brain histamine

The effect of age on brain histamine levels and histamine methyltransferase activity (HMT) was investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (12 months old) displayed significantly higher hypothalamic, midbrain and cortical histamine concentrations than three-month-old animals. In contrast, HMT activity was significantly decreased in all three brain regions. The increase in brain histamine concentration of old rats could have been partially attributed to decreased activity of HMT since elevated levels of brain histamine are known to occur following HMT inhibition. Present results indicate that similarly to the reported changes in the concentration, synthesis and/or metabolism of other central neurotransmitters in old rats, brain histamine regulation may also be affected in the process of aging.

Histamine and the hypothalamus

The chemical tools that could be used to examine the function of histamine in the brain are considered together with the evidence linking histamine specifically with the hypothalamus. The distribution of histamine and the enzymes responsible for its synthesis and metabolism is consistent with there being both mast cells and histaminergic nerve terminals within the hypothalamus. Iontophoresis, mepyramine binding and histamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase studies suggest that both histamine H1- and H2- receptors are present in the hypothalamus. In addition, intracerebroventricularly injected histamine receptor agonists and antagonists affect many functions associated with the hypothalamus such as cardiovascular control, food intake, body temperature control, and pituitary hormones whose release is mediated via the hypothalamus, such as corticotropin, growth hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, prolactin, gonadotropins and vasopressin. However, only in the case of thyroliberin release, prolactin release, body fluid control and blood pressure control is there evidence yet that such effects are mediated via histamine receptors actually in the hypothalamus. The effects of enzyme inhibitors suggest endogenous histamine may be involved in the physiological control of thyroid stimulating hormone, growth hormone and blood pressure, and the effects of receptor antagonists support a role for endogenous histamine in prolactin control. Otherwise, there is little evidence for a physiological role for endogenous, as against exogenous, histamine whether it be from histaminergic terminals or mast cells. In addition, few studies have tried to distinguish possible effects on presynaptic receptors, postsynaptic receptors, hypothalamic blood vessels or the hypophyseal portal blood vessels. It is concluded that although there is good evidence now linking histamine and the hypothalamus more specific studies are required, for instance using microinjection or in vitro techniques and the more specific chemical tools now available, to enable a clearer understanding of the physiological role of histamine in the hypothalamus.

Histamine receptor blockade (H2) versus inhibition of histamine synthesis in stress ulceration in rats

Cold and restraint stress in rats induced gastric mucosa lesions, increased gastric mucosa histidine decarboxylase activity and elevated hypothalamic content. Cimetidine did not modify the biochemical effects induced by stress but partially protected against gastric ulceration. alpha-Fluoromethyl histidine inhibited the increase of histidine decarboxylase activity in the gastric mucosa, inhibited the rise of hypothalamic histamine content and decreased the incidence of gastric lesions to the same extent as did cimetidine.

Brain histamine-plasma corticosterone interactions

Significant elevation in plasma corticosterone of rats achieved by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of corticosterone (2.4 mg/kg) was associated with a rapid (2.5 min) and significant increase in hypothalamic histamine (HA) levels which persisted for 60 min. Midbrain and cortical HA concentrations were not affected. Significant and prolonged elevation of hypothalamic, midbrain and cortical HA levels was achieved by L-histidine administration (500 mg/kg i.p.). The most significant increase was noted in the hypothalamus and persisted for 10 hours. The elevated brain HA levels were associated with significant increase in plasma corticosterone levels which lasted for 120 mins. Present data supports the involvement of central HA in endocrine function.

Effect of diphenhydramine on stress-induced changes in brain histidine decarboxylase activity, histamine and plasma corticosterone levels

Exposure of rats to platform stress induced a significant elevation in hypothalamic histamine levels. Air blast-stress resulted in a significant increase in hypothalamic histamine concentration and in histidine decarboxylase activity. No significant changes were noted either in the enzyme activity or in histamine levels in the midbrain or cortex of stressed rats. In the nonstressed rats, diphenhydramine (7.5 mg/kg intragastrically), a H1-receptor antagonist, did not influence histidine decarboxylase activity or histamine concentration in any of the three brain regions investigated. However, diphenhydramine pretreatment prevented the increase in histidine decarboxylase activity induced by air blasts. In untreated rats, plasma corticosterone levels were significantly elevated following either platform stress (4.5-fold) or air blasts (7.8-fold). A significant increase was also noted in saline and diphenhydramine-treated animals following these stressors, however, the increase in saline or diphenhydramine treated rats following air blasts was significantly less than that seen in untreated stressed controls.

The involvement of central histamine receptors in stress-induced responses of serum corticosterone and free fatty acids and in gastric ulcer development

Mild stress of restraint for 10 min at an ambient temperature of 18 degrees C increased serum corticosterone levels in rats considerably. Histamine given intravenously prior to restraint alone significantly further intensified the stress-induced elevation of serum corticosterone. Dimaprit and cimetidine failed to modify corticosterone responses to the mild stress. Severe stress of restraint and cold of 3 h duration increased serum corticosterone and free fatty acid levels considerably. Histamine given prior to stress exposure left the corticosterone and hyperlipaemic responses to severe stress unchanged. Dimaprit inhibited and cimetidine intensified the stress-induced hyperlipaemia. The most striking finding in the present experiment was a powerful inhibition of gastric stress ulcer generation by intraventricularly administered histamine. Dimaprit was similarly effective. This strong anti-ulcer effect of histamine was abolished by intraventricular pretreatment of rats with either H1- or H2-receptor antagonists, chloropyramine or cimetidine. The results may suggest that in the rat a mild stress does not fully activate central histaminergic pathways involved in corticosterone responses. During severe stress histamine considerably prevents gastric ulcer generation and both H1- and H2-receptors mediate this action of histamine.

Effect of diazepam on stress induced changes in brain histamine

Acute treatment with diazepam (2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg) did not affect the basal histamine concentration in the hypothalamus, midbrain or in the cortex of the rat. The increase in the hypothalamic histamine level caused by 15 min of "platform stress" was significantly attenuated by diazepam (5 or 10 mg/kg) pretreatment, but the elevation induced by 15 min of air blasts remained unchanged. Diazepam significantly reduced the rise in plasma corticosterone concentration in response to air blast stress but did not affect the increase caused by "platform stress." Thus, in addition to the already known effects of diazepam on stress induced changes in other central neurotransmitters or neuromodulators, diazepam may also affect the hypothalamic histamine elevation induced by certain type of stress.

Brain histamine: plasma corticosterone spontaneous locomotor activity and temperature

Hypothalamic histamine exhibited circadian fluctuations in male Sprague-Dawley rats; low values were found during the dark period when spontaneous locomotor activity (S.L.A.) and temperature were elevated. A relatively high hypothalamic histamine level was observed during the early period of the light cycle and was associated with decreased S.L.A. and temperature. Histamine concentration was high when corticosterone levels were low at the end of the dark cycle and during the morning hours (4 a.m.-1 p.m.); but histamine levels were relatively constant while corticosterone concentration dropped during afternoon and early night hours (4 p.m.-10 p.m.). Furthermore, the lowest hypothalamic histamine level (at 1 a.m.) was associated with the average plasma corticosterone value, thus no consistent relationship between histamine and corticosterone levels could be observed. Circadian fluctuations in brain histamine may support its role in brain function.

Single and repeated air blast stress and brain histamine

Exposure of rats to air blasts for 1, 5 and 15 min resulted in a significant increase in plasma corticosterone level and in the hypothalamic histamine concentration. Midbrain histamine content was increased after 1 and 5 min of exposure but cortical histamine increased following 1 min of exposure only. Stress of longer duration (30 mins did not significantly affect histamine concentration in any of the three brain regions investigated, although plasma corticosterone level remained very significantly (14.5-fold) elevated. Repeated exposure of rats to air blasts of 15 min duration resulted in a significant elevation of hypothalamic histamine concentration while midbrain and cortical histamine was not significantly altered. Plasma corticosterone level was again very significantly (10-fold) increased. Present results suggest the involvement of brain histamine in the response to stress.