Cross-tolerance to phenobarbital following chronic ethanol polydipsia

Translational dynamics of alcohol tolerance of preclinical models and human laboratory studies

Increasing sensitivity due to alcohol intake has been explored using molecular and cellular mechanisms of sensitization and adaptive biobehavioral changes as well as through negative experiences of altered function during withdrawal. However, within both a preclinical and human laboratory setting, little has been elucidated toward understanding the neural substrates of decreased sensitivity to alcohol effects, that is, alcohol tolerance. More paradigms assessing alcohol tolerance are needed. Tolerance can be assessed through both self-reported response (subjective) and observed (objective) measurements. Therefore, sensitivity to alcohol is an exploitable variable that can be utilized to disentangle the diverse alcohol use disorder (AUD) phenotypical profile. This literature review focuses on preclinical models and human laboratory studies to evaluate alcohol tolerance and its modulating factors. Increased understanding of alcohol tolerance has the potential to reduce gaps between preclinical models and human laboratory studies to better evaluate the development of alcohol-related biobehavioral responses. Furthermore, alcohol tolerance can be used as an AUD phenotypic variable in randomized clinical trials designed for developing AUD therapies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Midazolam withdrawal and discriminative motor control: effects of FG 7142 and Ro 15-1788

Rats chronically drank either water or midazolam solution (0.1 mg/ml) in daily, 3-h schedule-induced polydipsia sessions and were evaluated in daily motor control sessions after polydipsia when midazolam metabolite levels had fallen to zero (withdrawal). Under midazolam polydipsia, animals orally self-administered between 21 and 38 mg/kg daily. The effect of acute drug administration [midazolam (0.75-3 mg/kg, SC), FG 7142 (1-8 mg/kg, IP), Ro 15-1788 (10-20 mg/kg, IP)] on motor control performance was similar after either chronic water or midazolam polydipsia. Thus chronic, oral midazolam self-administration did not lead to tolerance to the motor impairment produced by SC midazolam, nor did the daily discontinuation lead to impaired motor performance, nor had these performances, which occurred after daily elevated midazolam metabolite levels had reached zero (withdrawal), become sensitized to the effects of either the benzodiazepine inverse agonist FG 7142 or the agonist Ro 15-1788.

Diazepam and discriminative motor control: acute, chronic and withdrawal effects

Rats were trained to hold a force transducer operated with a paw so that it remained between upper and lower limits of a force band for a continuous 1.5-sec period to deliver each food pellet. Acute doses of diazepam impaired measures of this performance. Separate groups received chronic diazepam injections (6 mg/kg, IP) either presession (Before Group) or postsession (After Group), or presession vehicle (Vehicle Group). The After and Vehicle Groups demonstrated that neither chronic postsession diazepam, nor time alone, altered motor performance. The performance of the Before Group was affected by the daily diazepam, and although tolerance to the impairment developed, it was incomplete. Late in the chronic-administration phase (after 75 days) a toxic effect of the suspending agent became evident in all groups as a decrease in work rate, although the other performance indices were not affected. The withdrawal of diazepam from the Before Group led to improved performance which returned to the original baseline level.