Addictive agents and intracranial stimulation (ICS): novel antagonists and agonists of morphine and pressing for ICS

Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs

Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is a behavioral procedure in which operant responding is maintained by pulses of electrical brain stimulation. In research to study abuse-related drug effects, ICSS relies on electrode placements that target the medial forebrain bundle at the level of the lateral hypothalamus, and experimental sessions manipulate frequency or amplitude of stimulation to engender a wide range of baseline response rates or response probabilities. Under these conditions, drug-induced increases in low rates/probabilities of responding maintained by low frequencies/amplitudes of stimulation are interpreted as an abuse-related effect. Conversely, drug-induced decreases in high rates/probabilities of responding maintained by high frequencies/amplitudes of stimulation can be interpreted as an abuse-limiting effect. Overall abuse potential can be inferred from the relative expression of abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects. The sensitivity and selectivity of ICSS to detect abuse potential of many classes of abused drugs is similar to the sensitivity and selectivity of drug self-administration procedures. Moreover, similar to progressive-ratio drug self-administration procedures, ICSS data can be used to rank the relative abuse potential of different drugs. Strengths of ICSS in comparison with drug self-administration include 1) potential for simultaneous evaluation of both abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects, 2) flexibility for use with various routes of drug administration or drug vehicles, 3) utility for studies in drug-naive subjects as well as in subjects with controlled levels of prior drug exposure, and 4) utility for studies of drug time course. Taken together, these considerations suggest that ICSS can make significant contributions to the practice of abuse potential testing.

Some determinants of morphine effects on intracranial self-stimulation in rats: dose, pretreatment time, repeated treatment, and rate dependence

Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is a procedure used to evaluate the abuse liability of drugs. The μ opioid receptor agonist morphine is an acknowledged drug of abuse, and this study examined factors that may influence expression of abuse-related morphine effects on ICSS in rats. Adult male rats were equipped with intracranial electrodes targeting the medial forebrain bundle, and 10 stimulus frequencies (56-158 Hz in 0.05 log increments) were available during each daily session under a continuous reinforcement schedule. The primary dependent variable was the ICSS rate at each frequency. Under baseline conditions, the ICSS rate increased with frequency. After acute morphine (1-10 mg/kg), rate-decreasing effects predominated at early pretreatment times (10-30 min) and rate-increasing effects predominated at later pretreatment times (100-180 min). Acute morphine effects dissipated after 300 min. Repeated morphine (3.2-18 mg/kg/day×7 days at each dose) produced tolerance to rate-decreasing effects, enhanced expression of rate-increasing effects, and enhanced rate dependency of morphine effects. Withdrawal from repeated morphine produced small but significant dose-dependent decreases in ICSS. These results show that the magnitude and valence of morphine effects on rates of ICSS in rats are strongly influenced by morphine dose and pretreatment time, history of morphine exposure, and baseline ICSS rate.

The lateral hypothalamic area revisited: ingestive behavior

This article discusses the role of the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) in feeding and drinking and draws on data obtained from lesion and stimulation studies and neurochemical and electrophysiological manipulations of the area. The LHA is involved in catecholaminergic and serotonergic feeding systems and plays a role in circadian feeding, sex differences in feeding and spontaneous activity. This article discusses the LHA regarding dietary self-selection, responses to high-protein diets, amino acid imbalances, liquid and cafeteria diets, placentophagia, "stress eating," finickiness, diet texture, consistency and taste, aversion learning, olfaction and the effects of post-operative period manipulations by hormonal and other means. Glucose-sensitive neurons have been identified in the LHA and their manipulation by insulin and 2-deoxy-D-glucose is discussed. The effects on feeding of numerous transmitters, hormones and appetite depressants are described, as is the role of the LHA in salivation, lacrimation, gastric motility and secretion, and sensorimotor deficits. The LHA is also illuminated as regards temperature and feeding, circumventricular organs and thirst and electrolyte dynamics. A discussion of its role in the ischymetric hypothesis as an integrative Gestalt concept concludes the review.

Ventral tegmental self-stimulation selectively induces opioid peptide release in rat CNS

Intracranial self-stimulation (ICS) is thought to activate neuronal systems involved in processing natural reinforcing agents. Metabolic mapping studies have previously demonstrated a subset of CNS structures specifically engaged by ICS in animals receiving stimulation actively vs. passively. Since opiates are known to enhance ICS behavior and presumably its reinforcing properties, the current study addressed the question of the role of opioid peptides as mediators of ICS. Rats were trained on a fixed ration (FR) 20 schedule of responding maintained by ICS. Following response stabilization, rats were assigned either to an active or a corresponding yoked stimulation group at 1 of 2 schedules of reinforcement (i.e., FR1-YFR1, FR20-YFR20, or sedentary control), and opioid peptide release was inferred from in vivo receptor occupancy. Autoradiographic analyses identified 3 groups of structures. Treatment-induced alterations in occupancy were seen in the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, basolateral amygdala, ventral pallidum, medial habenula, dorsal raphe, posterior hypothalamus, substantia nigra pars compacta, agranular preinsular cortex, and zona incerta. Depending upon the structure, peptide release was dependent upon stimulus contingency (active vs. yoked) and/or schedule (FR1 vs. FR20). Evidence for ICS-induced inhibition of peptide release was found in the habenula and preinsular cortex. Nine additional structures, all components of, or receiving projections from, the limbic system, revealed complex interactions between ICS treatment and the electrode side. Finally, a widespread ipsilateral increase in receptor binding was seen rostrally from the cingulate, olfactory tubercle, and nucleus accumbens, along the lateral hypothalamus and hippocampus, and extending caudally to the substantia nigra and ventral tegmentum. These later effects appear to be related to stimulation-induced changes in blood flow and subsequent ligant presentation increases. Collectively, these data point towards the ability of rewarding brain stimulation to activate discrete neuronal opioid systems contingent upon specific behavioral as well as stimulus conditions.

Opiate antagonists and self-stimulation: extinction-like response patterns suggest selective reward deficit

The present study investigated the response decrement patterns produced by opiate antagonists on intracranial self-stimulation behavior, in order to determine if these drugs affect the reinforcement value of the stimulation or interfere with the ability of the animal to respond. Male rats lever-pressed in 60-min sessions on a continuous reinforcement schedule for self-stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. Naloxone (2.0 and 20 mg/kg) and naltrexone (2.0 and 20 mg/kg) suppressed self-stimulation only after a significant delay, in an extinction-like response decrement pattern, mimicking the effects of reductions in current intensity (75% and 50% of baseline). The increasing behavioral effects characteristic of the extinction pattern were observed despite the fact that testing began after the time point at which maximal suppression of self-stimulation occurs with these drugs, and when brain concentrations of these drugs were declining. Since normal responding was observed for several minutes after the beginning of the session, the results may explain why long sessions are necessary to observe suppression of self-stimulation by opiate antagonists. The extinction-like pattern produced by these drugs suggests that opiate antagonists suppress self-stimulation by reducing the reinforcement value of the stimulation, rather than by interfering with the ability of the animal to respond. These findings are consistent with a role for endogenous opioid peptides in brain stimulation reward.

Opiate antagonists and rewarding brain stimulation

This review examines the literature on the effects of opiate antagonists on brain stimulation (ICSS) reward. Antagonists should have predictable effects if endogenous opioids modulate ICSS. Naloxone is the antagonist most often used, and it has produced inconsistent results in some ICSS paradigms. When schedules of intermittent reinforcement are used, however, naloxone reliably reduces the rate of responding. It reverses the effects of opiate agonists on ICSS behavior, and it also attenuates the effects of psychomotor stimulants, such as amphetamine. The results produced by naloxone are consistent with a modulatory effect of endogenous opioid systems on reward, and suggest that the opiate and dopamine systems together exert significant control over ICSS. Further research is needed to characterize better the actions of the antagonists on ICSS behavior, and productive research directions are proposed. Data obtained in future studies might suggest how the endogenous opioid systems modulate both natural and brain stimulation reward.

Opioid-receptor blockade reduces nose-poke self-stimulation derived from medial entorhinal cortex

Rats were trained to nose-poke for intracranial self-stimulation (SS) with electrodes unilaterally implanted in the medial entorhinal cortex. The acute effects of naloxone (NX; 0.1-10 mg/kg, IP) on a continuous reinforcement schedule were determined. Reductions in the self-stimulation rates occurred only at moderate doses (median of individual changes = -36% at 1 and 5 mg/kg), whereas the high dose (10 mg/kg) was ineffective. None of the doses influenced operant behavior. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that endogenous opioid-opiate receptor mechanisms play a modulatory role in SS reward. Considering that NX was administered systemically the action of the drug on reinforcement levels may be mediated by a site distinct from the locus of stimulation.

Chronic naltrexone treatment increases the heroin-produced facilitation of self-stimulation

The facilitatory effects of heroin HCl (0.25 mg/kg, SC) on self-stimulation (SS) of the lateral hypothalamus before and after chronic treatment of naltrexone (10 mg/kg, SC, for 20 days) or vehicle were compared. The group that received chronic naltrexone had a larger heroin-induced facilitation of SS than the group that received vehicle. These data suggest that the sensitivity to the facilitatory effect of heroin on SS may be related to the amount of opiate receptor binding which is increased following chronic antagonist treatment. However, neither acute nor chronic treatment with naltrexone produced any significant changes in SS thresholds, suggesting that the directly stimulated substrate for the rewarding effect of brain stimulation is unlikely to be endorphinergic but is apparently modulated by the endogenous opioid system.

Effects of intracranial self-stimulation on brain opioid peptides

The neurochemical system(s) underlying brain stimulation reward (ICSS) has been investigated for many years. The catecholamine hypothesis is currently most accepted with predominant emphasis on the role of dopamine. The present report examines the role of three opioid peptides--Methionine and Leucine Enkephalin (ME and LE) and beta-Endorphin (beta-E) in this behavior. Peptide levels from pituitary, hypothalamus and whole brain were determined by independent RIAs and analyzed according to treatment: low, moderate and high ICSS responders, sham controls, animals receiving nonspecific stimulation, and naloxone--with and without ICSS. Not only did naloxone reduce ICSS from high responders by 74%, it also was able to reduce peptide levels--most notably for ME and beta E in most regions. Additionally, the effects of ICSS on endorphin levels was found to be related to the rate category of responding. Since endorphins are known to interact with dopamine systems, it is therefore considered likely that the endogenous opioid peptides play an important role in ICSS either directly or indirectly via their influence on catecholamine systems.

Endogenous opiates: 1983

This paper is the sixth in an annual series of reviews of research involving the endogenous opiates, each installment being restricted to work published during the previous year. Although the early articles in the series attempted to be comprehensive and cover the complete range of research with the opiate peptides, in the last two years we have limited our coverage to non-analgesic and behavioral work due to the enormous number of articles published in the field. The specific areas discussed here include stress, tolerance and dependence, consummatory responses, other gastrointestinal functions, interactions with alcohol, mental illness, learning and memory, cardiovascular responses, respiratory effects, thermoregulation, neurological disorders, activity, and miscellaneous other topics. As in previous years, we have attempted to present a relatively complete review of the subjects covered only for the previous year and generally have not tried to evaluate their contributions relative to those of past years.

Morphine and naloxone modulate intake of ethanol

Rats, deprived of food and water for 18 hr, were given an opportunity to drink water and sweetened ethanol solution for 1 hr prior to being fed and watered for 5 hr, daily. One group received water and sucrose solution without ethanol and other groups received water and sucrose solution with 3, 6, 12 or 24% ethanol. Prior to some days' opportunities to drink, rats were injected with morphine (2.5 mg/kg), naloxone (10 mg/kg), or saline. Morphine increased intake of solutions containing ethanol as compared to intake under placebo. Naloxone reduced intakes of both fluids. Since morphine only increased sucrose solution intake when it contained ethanol, it was concluded that increments in opioid activity increase rats' avidity for ethanol.

Opioid antinociception and positive reinforcement are mediated by different types of opioid receptors

Fentanyl (FEN) and diprenorphine's (DIPR) potentials for analgesia and reinforcement were assayed using rats. Analgesia was measured by the classic tail-flick test. The test germane to opioid reinforcement involved measuring pressing rates for direct electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and ventral tegmental area. FEN, as does morphine and heroin, produced strong analgesia and enhanced pressing rates for brain stimulation. DIPR produced no analgesia and antagonized FEN's analgesia. DIPR, at doses antagonizing FEN's analgesia, enhanced pressing for brain stimulation. DIPR's enhancement of pressing was antagonized by naloxone (100 micrograms/kg). When FEN and DIPR were given concurrently, pressing for brain stimulation was not reduced and was greater than after FEN alone was given. These data support a conclusion that different types of receptors are associated with opioid analgesia and reinforcement.

Assaying addiction liability of opioids

A number of procedures are available to assess an opioid's capacity to be positively reinforcing, but each has limitations that could lead to the false conclusion of no addiction potential. The recently developed conditioned place preference (CPP)-test, however, overcomes some of these limitations. Diprenorphine can be used to establish a CPP indicating it has an unsuspected capacity to elicit positive affect. Since diprenorphine antagonizes opioid analgesia and elicits signs of positive affect, the conclusion is confirmed that opioid analgesia and opioid's capacity to be positively reinforcing are separable.