Ethanol interoceptive cue and sleep-time duration in HAS and LAS selectively bred rats

Differential Neurosensitivity to the Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Ethanol in C57BL/6J and C3H/He Mice

BACKGROUND

A large body of evidence suggests that the interoceptive cue associated with ethanol intoxication is complex and dependent on a number of environmental and biological factors. Despite the fact that mice have been widely used to study genetic influences on sensitivity to various actions of ethanol, few studies have used mice to examine sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in two inbred mouse strains, namely C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice.

METHODS

Adult male C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice were trained to discriminate between ethanol and saline using a two-lever food reinforcement operant procedure. Once criterion discrimination performance was achieved, dose-response functions were determined from generalization tests. Additional experiments were conducted to determine whether differences in discrimination performance were related to differential blood/brain ethanol levels in the two mouse strains.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice with a 1.0 g/kg ethanol training dose. This deficit in acquisition was overcome when the training dose was increased to 2.0 g/kg for C3H/He mice. In a second experiment, a 1.5 g/kg training dose of ethanol was used for both strains. Again, a greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer training trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice. Blood ethanol levels did not differ between the strains after administration of the 1.5 g/kg training dose. However, blood and brain ethanol levels did differ between the strains after doses of ethanol were administered that produced equivalent discrimination performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that ethanol discrimination was more readily acquired and maintained in C57BL/6J mice than C3H/He mice. Ethanol dose-response functions generated from generalization tests also clearly demonstrated greater sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in C57BL/6J mice compared with the C3H/He strain. This differential sensitivity to the interoceptive cue produced by ethanol does not seem to be related to learning or pharmacokinetic differences between the two inbred strains.

Phorbol Ester Differentiates the Levels of [3H]MK-801 Binding in Rats Lines Selected for Differential Sensitivity to the Hypnotic Effects of Ethanol

These studies addressed the possible involvement between sensitivity to the hypnotic action of ethanol and function of the NMDA receptor. The studies were carried out using high-alcohol sensitive (HAS) and low-alcohol sensitive (LAS) rats, two rats having differential sensitivity to the acute hypnotic action of ethanol. The animal models were developed by a selective breeding experiment. Using a quantitative autoradiograph technique, it was demonstrated that [3H]MK-801 binding to the NMDA receptor was highest in hippocampus in both HAS and LAS rats, but significant [3H]MK-801 binding was also detected in cortex, caudate-putamen, and thalamus of HAS and LAS rats. The density of [3H]MK-801 binding was lower only in cerebellar granule layers of untreated HAS rats as compared to the same brain area in untreated LAS rats. Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) by 100 nM PDBu, increased [3H]MK-801 binding in cortex, caudate-putamen, thalamus, central gray, and cerebellum of HAS rats but activation of PKC did not influence [3H]MK-801 binding in LAS rats. These activation of PKC differentiates between [3H]MK-801 binding of HAS and LAS rats in frontal cortex (layer II-IV and cingulate), caudate-putamen, and ventral lateral thalamic nuclei. The basal level of PKC-gamma mRNA was higher in HAS rats than that of LAS rats. These results suggest that the activation of PKC potentiates NMDA receptor function of the rat line which is more sensitive to alcohol (HAS) but does not affect [3H]MK-801 binding of alcohol resistant (LAS) rats.

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: neuropharmacological characterization

Generally, compounds discriminated by animals possess psychotropic effects in animals and humans. As with many other drugs of abuse, strength of the ethanol discriminative stimulus is dose related. The majority of studies show that doses close to 1.0 g/kg are close to the minimum at which the discrimination can be learned easily. Substitution studies suggest that anxiolytic, sedative, atactic, and myorelaxant effects of ethanol all play an important role in the formation of its intercoeptive stimulus. Low doses of ethanol produce more excitatory cues, similar to amphetamine-like subjective stimuli, whereas higher doses produce rather sedative/hypnotic stimuli similar to those elicited by barbiturates. Substitution studies have shown that the complete substitution for ethanol may be exerted by certain GABA-mimetic drugs acting through different sites within the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor complex (e.g., diazepam, pentobarbital, certain neurosteroids), gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and antagonists of the glutamate NMDA receptor. Among the NMDA receptor antagonists both noncompetitive (e.g., dizocilpine) and competitive antagonists (e.g., CGP 40116) are capable of substituting for ethanol. Further, some antagonists of strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory sites among the NMDA receptor complex (e.g., L-701,324) dose-dependently substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus. On the other hand, neither GABA-benzodiazepine antagonists nor NMDA receptor agonists produce contradictory effects (i.e., reduce the ethanol discriminative stimulus). There is influence of a particular training dose of ethanol on the substitution pattern of different compounds. For example, 5-HT(1B/2C) agonists substitute for intermediate (1.0 g/kg) but not higher (2.0 g/kg) ethanol training doses. Discrimination studies with ethanol and drugs acting on NMDA and GABA receptors consistently indicate asymmetrical generalization. For example, ethanol is able to generalize to barbiturates and benzodiazepines, but neither the benzodiazepine nor barbiturate response generalizes to ethanol. Only a few drugs are able to antagonize, at least to some extent, the discriminative stimulus of ethanol (e.g., partial inverse GABA-benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-4513 and the opioid antagonist naloxone). The ethanol stimulus effect may be increased (i.e., stronger recognition) by N-cholinergic drugs (nicotine), dopaminergic drugs (apomorphine), and 5-HT3 receptor agonists (m-chlorophenylbiguanide). Thus, the ethanol stimulus is composed of the several components, with the NMDA receptor and GABA(A) receptor complex being of particular importance. This suggests that a drug mixture may be more capable of substituting for ethanol (or block its stimulus) than a single compound. The ability of drugs to substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus is frequently, although not preclusively, associated with the reduction of voluntary ethanol consumption. The examples of positive correlation are gamma-hydroxybutyrate, possibly memantine and certain serotonergic drugs such as fluoxetine. However, it remains uncertain to what extent the discriminative stimulus of ethanol can be seen as relevant in the understanding of the complex mechanisms of dependence.

Initiation of ethanol self-administration by the sucrose-substitution method with HAS and LAS rats

This study was performed to examine ethanol self-administration in rats bred for different sensitivities to the sedative effects of alcohol [the Colorado High Alcohol Sensitive (HAS) and Low Alcohol Sensitive (LAS) rats]. Four rats from each replicate line of the HAS and LAS rats (n = 16) were obtained from the University of Colorado, and initiation to self-administer ethanol by the sucrose-substitution procedure was attempted. Before the initiation procedure was conducted, home-cage ethanol intake and preference ratio did not differ between LAS and HAS rats. During the initiation procedure, the LAS rats came to self-administer 10% ethanol (v/v) at similar levels as outbred Wistar rats initiated with the same procedure (approximately 0.4 g/kg/session). The HAS rats, however, failed to initiate (approximately 0.08 g/kg/ session after completing the sucrose-substitution procedure) and lever pressing was reduced even more in the HAS rats when the ethanol concentration presented was > 10% (v/v). Three of the eight HAS rats stopped lever pressing completely when the ethanol concentration was raised to 15%. After initiation, home-cage preference ratio differed significantly between the LAS and HAS rats (LAS > HAS, p < 0.03). That the LAS rats did not consume greater amounts of ethanol compared with outbred Long-Evans or Wistar rats is contrary to our hypothesis, based on recent human data suggesting that a lower sensitivity to ethanol could result in increased alcohol intake. The finding that the HAS rats could not be initiated, while selectively bred ethanol nonpreferring rats can, is also contrary to our hypothesis. Further studies related to ethanol self-administration with the HAS line could provide important information related to the genetics of alcohol nonacceptance.

Differential open field reactivity in HAS and LAS rats

To identify potential differences in emotional reactivity in high (HAS) and low (LAS) alcohol-sensitive rats in open field tests, 20 ethanol naive, 19th generation HAS and 20 LAS rats from the University of Colorado's Alcohol Research Center each received three consecutive daily 20-min exposures to a 1-sq m open field. The results of repeated-measures ANOVA and Keuls tests, performed on each of five concurrently recorded behaviors, indicated that, compared to HAS rats, LAS animals exhibited significantly greater latencies to begin ambulation, elevated ambulation, and rearing scores that failed to habituate over 3 days, and an increasing intersession bolus count. In addition, significant positive correlations occurred between days 2 + 3 (but not day 1) ambulation and bolus counts in LAS but not HAS rats, and between day 1 ambulation and (i) rearings and (ii) center square entries in HAS but not LAS rats. Together with other cited data, these results provide support for a hypothesis of relatively greater emotional reactivity in LAS rats and illustrate the need for multiple measures and sessions in evaluating open field behavior.

P and NP rats respond differently to the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine

Rats selectively bred for ethanol preference, that is, alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) rats, were trained to discriminate the interoceptive stimuli produced by IP-administered 1,000 mg/kg ethanol (10% v/v) in a two-lever, food-motivated, operant task. Once criterion performance was attained, dose-response experiments indicated an ED50 value for P rats = 354.1 mg/kg, whereas NP rats generated an ED50 value of 495.1 mg/kg, not significantly different from each other. In contrast to these similar sensitivities to ethanol, administration of doses of nicotine (0.4-1.2 mg/kg, SC) indicated that P rats were significantly more sensitive to the ethanol-like effects of nicotine than were NP rats. The results provide additional evidence for a possible hereditary co-occurrence of alcohol and nicotine sensitivity.

Ethanol discrimination in Fawn-Hooded rats is compromised when compared to other strains

The drug discrimination paradigm was used to evaluate the behavioral differences in response to ethanol between three strains of rats, viz., Sprague-Dawley, N/Nih and Fawn-Hooded. This latter group is thought to have a genetically-transmitted diminished central serotonin function. Each group of rats was trained to discriminate between the stimulus properties of 600 mg/kg ethanol and its vehicle in a two-lever, food-motivated operant task. Results indicate that the Fawn-Hooded rats required a significantly longer time and a higher ethanol dose to reach criterion discrimination performance. Furthermore, the ED50 value of the Fawn-Hooded rats, once trained, was higher than the Sprague-Dawley or N/Nih rats. The possibility that a reciprocal relationship exists between lowered central serotonin concentrations and higher alcohol consumption is suggested and the hypothesis that the diminished ability to recognize the interoceptive stimuli produced by ethanol may result in larger amounts of ethanol being consumed is offered.

Drug discrimination by humans compared to nonhumans: current status and future directions

In drug discrimination (DD) procedures, behavior is differentially reinforced depending on the presence or absence of specific drug stimuli. The DD paradigm has been widely adopted by behavioral pharmacologists because of its specificity of stimulus control, concordance with drug action at cellular levels and its use as a preclinical model of subject-rated effects in humans. With the successful extension of DD to humans, a comparison of human and nonhuman DD will help place each in the context of the other. Twenty-eight studies of DD in humans are reviewed, including studies of amphetamine, opioid, benzodiazepine, caffeine, nicotine, marijuana and ethanol discriminative stimuli. Comparison of procedures between studies in humans and nonhumans reveals a common tradition, except the use of instructions appears to facilitate greatly DD acquisition in humans. Findings were qualitatively similar between humans and nonhumans. Potency relationships were quantitatively similar between humans and most, but not all, other species. Areas of human DD needing additional empirical evaluation include the influence of instructions, the effects of training dose and the effects of antagonists. Additionally, antihistamines, barbiturates, nicotine and marijuana are under-represented in human DD.

Biphasic effects of ethanol tested with drug discrimination in HAD and LAD rats

Seventh-generation selectively bred high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats were trained to make differential responses for ethanol (0.75 g/kg, IP) and saline vehicle, following postadministration intervals (PI) of 2 min (HAD-2 and LAD-2 animals) and 30 min (HAD-30 and LAD-30 animals). ED50 values of 0.395 and 0.352 g/kg, respectively, for HAD-2 and LAD-2 animals and 0.269 and 0.314 g/kg, respectively, for HAD-30 and LAD-30 animals reflect the absence of any phenotypic difference for the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. HAD-2 animals were more responsive than LAD-2 animals to the stimulating effects of ethanol as measured by total response rates during training sessions. The differential ethanol response generalized to pentobarbital in all four groups but not to morphine, an alternative CNS depressant. The specific antagonist of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptors, 3-tropanyl-3,5-dichlorobenzoate (MDL 72222), up to doses of 14.0 mg/kg failed to antagonize the discriminative effects of ethanol. Ethanol sleep times did not differ between groups.

Ethanol-produced interoceptive stimuli are time dependent in selectively bred HAS and LAS rats

Fourteenth generation high alcohol-sensitive (HAS) and low alcohol-sensitive (LAS) rats were trained to discriminate the effects of 600 mg/kg intraperitoneally administered ethanol from its vehicle at 6 and 30 min postadministration. Each of the earlier- and later-trained animals were given lower doses of ethanol and ED50 values at their trained postadministration interval were found to be nonsignificantly different. Thus, there was no difference between HAS and LAS animals as to their sensitivity to the discriminative effects of ethanol. Phase-generalization studies, where rats trained at 6 min postadministration were tested with the drug at 30 min postadministration were shown not to generalize, whereas the animals trained at 30 min postadministration and tested at 6 min postinjection were shown to readily discriminate the discriminative stimuli. This asymmetrical generalization lends evidence to the biphasic action of ethanol, and suggests that the earlier phase is quantitatively different than the latter phase. The similarity in sensitivity of the LAS and HAS animals, furthermore, suggests that the discrimination of ethanol is not based on its hypnotic effects.

HAD and LAD rats respond differently to stimulating effect but not discriminative effects of ethanol

The drug discrimination paradigm (DD) was used to evaluate behavioral differences of rats selectively bred for differential ethanol drinking preferences. Seventh-generation high alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats were trained to discriminate between ethanol (0.5 g/kg, IP) and saline vehicle, following a 2-min presession interval (PI), using an FR-10 schedule of reinforcement. The HAD line was more responsive than the LAD line to the stimulating effect of ethanol as measured by total response rates. ED50 values of 0.239 and 0.244 g/kg for the HAD and LAD lines, respectively, do not reflect any difference in the discriminative effects of ethanol. Response rates during DD indicated a dissociation of rate-increasing effects and discriminative performance following ethanol. In addition to differential drinking preference, these data suggest that selective breeding for the HAD and LAD animals also involves the stimulant action of ethanol but not on the discriminative effects.

HAS and LAS rats respond differentially to behavioral effects of ethanol, pentobarbital, chlorpromazine and chlordiazepoxide

The drug discrimination paradigm (DD) was used to evaluate differences in performance of rats selectively bred for differential sensitivity to the hypnotic effects of ethanol. Tenth generation high-alcohol sensitive (HAS) and low-alcohol sensitive (LAS) rats were trained to discriminate between ethanol (1.0 g/kg, IP) and saline vehicle on a VR-5 schedule of reinforcement. The HAS strain was more sensitive to the discriminative effects of ethanol than the LAS strain, but the magnitude of difference was much smaller than the differential sleep-time differences. The biphasic action of ethanol was differentially seen when the LAS animals exhibited increased activity during both DD and spontaneous motor activity measures and the HAS exhibited decreased activity during DD only. Pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide but not chlorpromazine elicited the ethanol discriminative choice in both HAS and LAS strains. Response rates during DD indicated a dissociation of rate depressant effects and discriminative performance following ethanol. These findings are discussed in relationship to some current and future uses of selectively bred animal strains and DD for studying the effects of alcohol.