The pentylenetetrazole-cue antagonist actions of bretazenil (Ro 16-6028) as compared to midazolam

Self-administration of bretazenil under progressive-ratio schedules: behavioral economic analysis of the role intrinsic efficacy plays in the reinforcing effects of benzodiazepines

Previous research suggests that intrinsic efficacy of benzodiazepines is an important determinant of their behavioral effects. We evaluated the reinforcing effects of the benzodiazepine partial agonist bretazenil using behavioral economic models referred to as "consumer demand" and "labor supply". Four rhesus monkeys were trained under a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule of i.v. midazolam injection. A range of doses of bretazenil (0.001-0.03 mg/kg/injection and vehicle) was evaluated for self-administration with an initial response requirement of 40 that doubled to 640; significant self-administration was maintained at doses of 0.003-0.03 mg/kg/injection. Next, a dose of bretazenil that maintained peak injections/session was made available with initial response requirements doubling from 10 to 320 (maximum possible response requirements of 160 and 5120, respectively), and increasing response requirements decreased self-administration (mean number of injections/session) of a peak dose (0.01 mg/kg/injection). Analyses based on consumer demand revealed that a measure of reinforcing strength termed "essential value", for bretazenil was similar to that previously obtained with midazolam (non-selective full agonist), but less than that observed for zolpidem (full agonist, selective for α1 subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors). According to labor supply analysis, the reinforcing effects of bretazenil were influenced by the economic concept referred to as a "price effect", similar to our previous findings with midazolam but not zolpidem. In general, behavioral economic indicators of reinforcing effectiveness did not differentiate bretazenil from a non-selective full agonist. These findings raise the possibility that degree of intrinsic efficacy of a benzodiazepine agonist may not be predictive of relative reinforcing effectiveness.

The discriminative stimulus effects of pentylenetetrazol as a model of anxiety: recent developments

Pentylenetetrazol (PTZ), a GABA(A) receptor antagonist and prototypical anxiogenic drug, has been extensively utilized in animal models of anxiety. PTZ produces a reliable discriminative stimulus which is largely mediated by the GABA(A) receptor. Several classes of compounds can modulate the PTZ discriminative stimulus including 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(3), NMDA, glycine, and L-type calcium channel ligands. Spontaneous PTZ-lever responding is seen in trained rats during withdrawal from GABA(A) receptor compounds such as chlordiazepoxide and diazepam, and also ethanol, morphine, nicotine, cocaine, haloperidol, and phencyclidine. This effect is largely mediated by the GABA(A) receptor, which suggests that anxiety may be part of a generalized withdrawal syndrome mediated by the GABA(A) receptor. There are also important hormonal influences on PTZ. Corticosterone plays some role in mediation of its anxiogenic effects. There is a marked sex difference in response to the discriminative stimulus effects of PTZ, and estrogens appear to protect against its anxiogenic effects. Further work with the PTZ drug discrimination is warranted for characterization of anxiety during withdrawal, and the hormonal mechanisms of anxiety.

High-dose discrimination training with midazolam: context determines generalization profile

In previous work, greater differentiation among ligands for the benzodiazepine site was found in rats trained to discriminate among vehicle, 0.32, and 3.2 mg/kg midazolam than in animals trained to discriminate a single midazolam dose from vehicle (i.e., virtually all test drugs occasioned low-dose midazolam-appropriate responding, but most did not occasion high-dose midazolam-appropriate responding even at high test doses). A possibility was that merely training with 3.2 mg/kg-midazolam (not previously studied) would result in greater selectivity than training with lower midazolam doses. In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg i.p. midazolam from no drug under a two-lever, food-maintained, procedure; and drugs from the previous three-lever studies were tested. Triazolam, bretazenil, clonazepam, lorazepam, midazolam, zolpidem, chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital, and flurazepam all dose-dependently occasioned >80% responding on the midazolam-appropriate lever in roughly that order of potency. Only triazolam had occasioned midazolam 3.2 mg/kg-appropriate responding in the previous work. The greater differentiation among these drugs in the dose-vs.-dose procedure likely was due to a training dose context rather than to the high training dose per se.

Blockade of behavioral effects of bretazenil by flumazenil and ZK 93,426 in pigeons

Benzodiazepine receptor partial agonists manifest full efficacy in preclinical tests of anxiolytic drug action but do not fully reproduce the discriminative stimulus effects of benzodiazepine receptor full agonists in pigeons. The partial agonist, bretazenil, binds to both diazepam-sensitive and diazepam-insensitive GABAA receptors. Previous studies have suggested a role for each of these receptor populations in some behavioral effects of bretazenil in pigeons. A possible role for these receptor subtypes in the behavioral effects of bretazenil was further investigated through drug interaction studies with the benzodiazepine receptor antagonists, flumazenil and ZK 93,426. Whereas flumazenil binds with high affinity to both receptor isoforms, ZK 93,426 binds preferentially to diazepam-sensitive binding sites. Bretazenil markedly increased punished responding of pigeons without significantly affecting nonpunished responding. In pigeons discriminating the full benzodiazepine receptor agonist, midazolam, from saline, bretazenil produced only 60-75% maximal effect. Flumazenil and ZK 93,426 neither increased punished responding nor substituted for midazolam, but dose-dependently blocked the effects of bretazenil on punished responding. Flumazenil also dose-dependently blocked the effects of bretazenil in midazolam-discriminating pigeons, whereas ZK 93,426 only attenuated this effect. These results indicate that bretazenil's actions as a partial agonist at diazepam-sensitive benzodiazepine receptors mediate increases in punished responding and substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam in pigeons. The differences in the effects of flumazenil and ZK 93,426 on the discriminative stimulus effects of bretazenil suggest a potential contribution of diazepam-insensitive sites to this behavioral effect.

Further evidence for differences between non-selective and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective, benzodiazepine receptor ligands in murine models of "state" and "trait" anxiety

The behavioural effects of several BZ (omega) receptor ligands were compared in mice using the light/dark choice task, an animal model of "state" anxiety, and the free-exploration test, which has been proposed as an experimental model of "trait" anxiety. The drugs used included non-selective full (alprazolam, clorazepate, chlordiazepoxide and diazepam), partial agonists (bretazenil, imidazenil and Ro 19-8022) and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective receptor ligands (abecarnil, CL 218,872 and zolpidem). In the light/dark choice task, non-selective full agonists elicited clear anxiolytic-like effects increasing time spent in the lit box and simultaneously reducing attempts at entry into the illuminated cage followed by withdrawal responses, a measure of risk assessment. With the exception of abecarnil, both non-selective partial agonists and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective receptor ligands displayed reduced efficacy compared to the full agonists as they decreased risk assessment responses without altering time in the lit box. In addition, the weak anxiolytic-like actions displayed by selective BZ-1 (omega 1) agents were evident only at doses which reduced locomotor activity, indicating that this effect may be non-specific. In the free-exploration test, non-selective BZ (omega) receptor agonists markedly increased the percentage of time spent in the novel compartment and reduced the number of attempts to enter whereas selective BZ-1 (omega 1) receptor ligands displayed a weaker neophobia-reducing effect as they reduced risk assessment responses only. As was the case in the light/dark choice task, this latter effect was observed at locomotor depressant doses. These findings indicate that while both full and partial BZ (omega) receptor agonists are equally effective against "trait" anxiety, full agonists may be superior in reducing "state" anxiety. In addition, the lack of specific effects of selective BZ-1 (omega 1) receptor ligands in reducing both types of anxiety suggests that the BZ-1 (omega 1) receptor subtype cannot be considered as the primary target mediating the anxiolytic action of drugs interacting with the GABAA benzodiazepine receptor complex.

Evaluation of the discriminative stimulus effects of the novel sedative-hypnotic CL 284,846

CL 284,846, N-[3-(3-cyanopyrazolo[1, 5-a]pyrimidin-7-yl)phenyl)]-N- ethylacetamide, is a novel non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic with benzodiazepine-like sedative effects, but with less apparent liability for accompanying undesired side effects. In an effort to further characterize its pharmacological activity, CL 284,846 (3.0 mg/kg, IP, 30 min pretreatment) was established as a discriminative stimulus (DS) in rats (n = 7). CL 284,846 (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) showed a dose-related increase in drug-appropriate responding up to the training dose and a dose-related decrease in response rate. The benzodiazepine agonist triazolam (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), the benzodiazepine partial agonist Ro 17-1812 (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) and the triazolopyridazine CL 218,872 (1.0-3.0 mg/kg) substituted for CL 284,846 in all rats, whereas the imidazopyridines zolpidem (3.0-10.0 mg/kg) and alpidem (10.0-30.0 mg/kg), the benzodiazepine partial agonist bretazenil (0.03-10.0 mg/kg) and the novel putative anxiolytic CL 273,547 (10.0-56.0 mg/kg) substituted in most, but not all, rats. Ro 17-1812, bretazenil, and CL 218,872 had no effect on response rate while the other drugs showed a concomitant decrease in rate. The 5-HT1A agonist buspirone (1.0-10.0 mg/kg) and the barbiturate pentobarbital (3.0-17.0 mg/kg) failed to substitute for CL 284,846 up to rate-decreasing doses. The benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (3.0-10.0 mg/kg) blocked the DS effects of CL 284,846 in most rats with no effect on response rate. Taken together, these results suggest that the DS effects of CL 284,846 are mediated via benzodiazepine receptors; however, the DS profile of CL 284,846 remains distinct from both benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic drugs.

Discriminative stimulus effects of alpidem, a new imidazopyridine anxiolytic

Alpidem in an imidazopyridine derivative which binds selectively to the omega 1 (BZ1) receptor subtype. It is active in some, but not all, behavioural tests sensitive to benzodiazepine anxiolytics and has clinical anti-anxiety effects. However, in a previous study, it was shown that alpidem did not substitute for chlordiazepoxide in rats trained to discriminate this benzodiazepine. The present experiments were carried out to investigate the discriminative stimulus properties of alpidem in greater detail. In the first experiment rats learned to discriminate a dose of 10 mg/kg alpidem from saline. Acquisition of the discrimination was long and performance unstable. Chlordiazepoxide, clorazepate and zolpidem substituted only partially for alpidem but the effects of the training dose of alpidem were blocked by 10 mg/kg flumazenil. The second experiment established stimulus control more rapidly to a dose of 30 mg/kg alpidem. Alpidem induced dose-related stimulus control, and dose-related and complete substitution for alpidem was produced by zolpidem, abecarnil, CL 218,872, triazolam and suriclone. Partial substitution occurred with chlordiazepoxide, clorazepate and pentobarbital. In most cases, high levels of substitution were produced only by doses which greatly reduced response rates even though the training dose of alpidem produced only modest decreases in rates. Ethanol, buspirone and bretazenil produced very little substitution for alpidem and both flumazenil and bretazenil antagonised the effects of alpidem. In two further experiments alpidem was found to substitute for the stimulus produced by zolpidem (2 mg/kg) but not for that produced by ethanol (1.5 g/kg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The discriminative stimulus properties of buspirone involve dopamine-2 receptor antagonist activity

To investigate a dopaminergic component in the discriminative stimulus properties of buspirone, rats were trained to discriminate 2.5 mg/kg buspirone from saline, using a two lever, food-rewarded, fixed ratio 10 operant procedure. To test the dopamine-2 (D2) antagonist action of buspirone, a second group of rats was trained to discriminate 0.16 mg/kg apomorphine from saline. In addition to a complete generalization to 8-OH-DPAT, the D2 antagonists haloperidol, R 79598 and sulpiride showed a partial generalization to buspirone. The benzodiazepine ligands chlordiazepoxide and bretazenil did not generalize to the buspirone cue. Buspirone (2.0 mg/kg) completely blocked the apomorphine cue in the apomorphine trained rats. Haloperidol, R 79895 and sulpiride also blocked the apomorphine cue, although at doses much smaller than the doses needed to evoke buspirone responding in the buspirone trained group. 8-OH-DPAT did not antagonize apomorphine. It was concluded that the D2 action of buspirone partially contributes to its discriminative stimulus properties. Mediation of the buspirone cue by 5-HT1a receptor activation seemed predominant. Further, buspirone can act as a full D2 antagonist in drug discrimination. A model was proposed suggesting a compound discriminative stimulus complex of buspirone with a dominant 5-HT1a component that overshadows a less pronounced D2 component.