Biphasic effects of ethanol tested with drug discrimination in HAD and LAD rats

Do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse?

Individuals vary in their initial reactions to drugs of abuse in ways that may contribute to the likelihood of subsequent drug use. In humans, most drugs of abuse produce positive subjective states such as euphoria and feelings of well-being, which may facilitate repeated use. In nonhumans, many drugs initially increase locomotor activity and produce discriminative stimulus effects, both of which have been considered to be models of human stimulant and subjective states. Both humans and nonhumans vary in their sensitivity to early acute drug effects in ways that may predict future use or self-administration, and some of these variations appear to be genetic in origin. However, it is not known exactly how the initial responses to drugs in either humans or nonhumans relate to subsequent use or abuse. In humans, positive effects of drugs facilitate continued use of a drug while negative effects discourage use, and in nonhumans, greater genetic risk for drug intake is predicted by reduced sensitivity to drug aversive effects; but whether these initial responses affect escalation of drug use, and the development of dependence is currently unknown. Although early use of a drug is a necessary step in the progression to abuse and dependence, other variables may be of greater importance in the transition from use to abuse. Alternatively, the same variables that predict initial acute drug effects and early use may significantly contribute to continued use, escalation and dependence. Here we review the existing evidence for relations between initial direct drug effects, early use, and continued use. Ultimately, these relations can only be determined from systematic longitudinal studies with comprehensive assessments from early drug responses to progression of problem drug use. In parallel, additional investigation of initial responses in animal models as predictors of drug use will shed light on the underlying mechanisms.

Differential Neurosensitivity to the Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Ethanol in C57BL/6J and C3H/He Mice

BACKGROUND

A large body of evidence suggests that the interoceptive cue associated with ethanol intoxication is complex and dependent on a number of environmental and biological factors. Despite the fact that mice have been widely used to study genetic influences on sensitivity to various actions of ethanol, few studies have used mice to examine sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in two inbred mouse strains, namely C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice.

METHODS

Adult male C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice were trained to discriminate between ethanol and saline using a two-lever food reinforcement operant procedure. Once criterion discrimination performance was achieved, dose-response functions were determined from generalization tests. Additional experiments were conducted to determine whether differences in discrimination performance were related to differential blood/brain ethanol levels in the two mouse strains.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice with a 1.0 g/kg ethanol training dose. This deficit in acquisition was overcome when the training dose was increased to 2.0 g/kg for C3H/He mice. In a second experiment, a 1.5 g/kg training dose of ethanol was used for both strains. Again, a greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer training trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice. Blood ethanol levels did not differ between the strains after administration of the 1.5 g/kg training dose. However, blood and brain ethanol levels did differ between the strains after doses of ethanol were administered that produced equivalent discrimination performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that ethanol discrimination was more readily acquired and maintained in C57BL/6J mice than C3H/He mice. Ethanol dose-response functions generated from generalization tests also clearly demonstrated greater sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in C57BL/6J mice compared with the C3H/He strain. This differential sensitivity to the interoceptive cue produced by ethanol does not seem to be related to learning or pharmacokinetic differences between the two inbred strains.

Adolescent rats discriminate a mild state of ethanol intoxication likely to act as an appetitive unconditioned stimulus

Practically no information is available in relation to the capability of the adolescent animal in terms of discriminating postabsorptive effects of ethanol. Three experiments were conducted to analyze whether young, genetically heterogeneous rats discriminate different stages of the process of intoxication exerted by a low dose (0.5 g/kg) of ethanol. An ethanol pharmacokinetic profile was first examined to select two stages within the process of ethanol intoxication that, as a function of the corresponding blood ethanol concentrations (BECs), could represent two potentially discriminable drug states. In a second experiment, sucrose was available when the BECs of rats peaked or were of a lesser magnitude (5 and 30 min postadministration time, respectively). When animals were tested under similar or different drug states relative to the training procedure, no behavioral evidence indicative of differential sucrose expectancy was obtained. In Experiment 3, rats discriminated each of the previously defined ethanol states from a non-drug state. Unexpectedly, it was also found that the pharmacological effects of the 0.5-g/kg dose of ethanol are likely to support appetitive associative learning that involves the taste of sucrose as a conditioned stimulus. The apparent positive affective components of the state of ethanol intoxication have rarely been observed in genetically heterogeneous rats with rather brief experiences with the drug's effects.

Moderate doses of ethanol partially reverse avoidance learning deficits in high-alcohol-drinking rats

We previously reported that ethanol-naive high-alcohol-drinking (HAD1 and HAD2) rats exhibited selective deficits in active avoidance learning, as compared to low-alcohol-drinking (LAD1 and LAD2) rats, in a signaled bar-pressing task [Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 24 (2000) 1778]. In the current study, we used appetitive and aversive learning tasks to assess whether administration of ethanol influences approach and avoidance learning in HAD and LAD rats. Rats were administered 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 g ethanol/kg body weight during appetitive and aversive conditioning sessions. We found that ethanol impaired acquisition of the appetitive conditioned response in a dose-dependent manner in both HAD and LAD rats, with 1.5 g/kg ethanol producing the greatest deficits. Notably, moderate doses of ethanol (0.5 and 1.0 g/kg) partially reversed avoidance learning deficits in HAD rats, but only when appetitive conditioning preceded aversive conditioning. The highest dose (1.5 g/kg EtOH) abolished avoidance responding altogether in HAD rats. Avoidance responding in LAD rats was not affected by any dose of ethanol. These results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that alcohol preference may be associated with increased fear or anxiety, but the conditions under which ethanol produces a reduction of fear and anxiety in HAD rats appear to be relatively complex.

LAD rats learn a three-key drug discrimination more rapidly and achieve a higher level of performance than HAD rats

High-alcohol drinking (HAD1) and low-alcohol drinking (LAD1) rats were trained to discriminate among 0.75 g/kg ethanol, 1.5 g/kg ethanol and saline under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule. LAD rats learned the discrimination more rapidly than HAD rats, and asymptotic performance by LAD rats was better than that of HAD rats. The 0.75 g/kg dose of ethanol failed to control the responding of HAD rats, both when baseline responding stabilized and during the determination of an ethanol dose-response curve. These differences between LAD and HAD rats in ethanol discrimination were not observed in previous experiments using a two-choice procedure. The three-choice procedure may be useful for establishing strain differences in ethanol discrimination. These and previous experiments with alcohol-preferring rats suggest that the learning of an ethanol discrimination may be dissociable from voluntary ethanol consumption in rat strains bred selectively to consume ethanol.

Relationship of components of an alcohol interoceptive stimulus to induction of desire for alcohol in social drinkers

The ability of a low (0.2 g/kg) oral dose of ethanol to provide a drug discriminative stimulus was studied in young healthy human volunteers, who were social drinkers. Seventeen of 24 subjects acquired the discrimination following 10 trials in which they received aliquots of ethanol or of placebo drink (tonic water mixed with Tabasco sauce). In generalization studies, in which the dose of ethanol was varied, discrimination performance was dose dependent; doses greater than 0.05 g/kg gave rise to significant ethanol-appropriate responding. Concurrent estimates of the subjective effects of doses administered as discriminative stimuli revealed that two factors--taste and light-headedness--were associated with discrimination: at the training dose, 0.2 g/kg, although both the factors taste and light-headedness were significantly increased, only taste predicted discrimination performance. At lower doses, taste did not contribute to discrimination, but the subjective rating light-headedness correlated significantly with discrimination accuracy. Post hoc analyses of the influence of the amount of alcohol regularly drunk by the volunteers, on discrimination performance suggested light-headedness correlated with discriminative performance only in social drinkers drinking more than 20 units per week. In a second experiment, groups of "high" (mean 40 units per week) and "low" (mean 10 units per week) social drinkers were prospectively identified. Discrimination performance of 0.2 g/kg ethanol in orange juice vs. orange juice vehicle indicated that both groups were able to perform the discrimination following a single training trial, and that generalization curves over the range 0.05-0.2 g/kg were dose dependent, and not different between the groups. At the lowest dose, discrimination performance was predicted by taste, stimulation, and light-headedness in the "high" group, but not in the "low" group. The ability of these ethanol doses to induce feelings of craving for ethanol were assessed in parallel, using the Desire for Alcohol Questionnaire (DAQ). "High" drinkers showed higher desire for ethanol on all factors of the DAQ except the "positive negative reinforcement" factor, and sampling ethanol tended to increase desire in these measures. However, at each dose, the induction of feelings of desire for ethanol showed a negative correlation with discrimination performance. These findings are discussed in the context of the ability of animals and humans to use several components of drug-induced stimuli in the performance of drug discrimination, and the role of such discriminative stimuli in priming of ethanol drinking.

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: neuropharmacological characterization

Generally, compounds discriminated by animals possess psychotropic effects in animals and humans. As with many other drugs of abuse, strength of the ethanol discriminative stimulus is dose related. The majority of studies show that doses close to 1.0 g/kg are close to the minimum at which the discrimination can be learned easily. Substitution studies suggest that anxiolytic, sedative, atactic, and myorelaxant effects of ethanol all play an important role in the formation of its intercoeptive stimulus. Low doses of ethanol produce more excitatory cues, similar to amphetamine-like subjective stimuli, whereas higher doses produce rather sedative/hypnotic stimuli similar to those elicited by barbiturates. Substitution studies have shown that the complete substitution for ethanol may be exerted by certain GABA-mimetic drugs acting through different sites within the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor complex (e.g., diazepam, pentobarbital, certain neurosteroids), gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and antagonists of the glutamate NMDA receptor. Among the NMDA receptor antagonists both noncompetitive (e.g., dizocilpine) and competitive antagonists (e.g., CGP 40116) are capable of substituting for ethanol. Further, some antagonists of strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory sites among the NMDA receptor complex (e.g., L-701,324) dose-dependently substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus. On the other hand, neither GABA-benzodiazepine antagonists nor NMDA receptor agonists produce contradictory effects (i.e., reduce the ethanol discriminative stimulus). There is influence of a particular training dose of ethanol on the substitution pattern of different compounds. For example, 5-HT(1B/2C) agonists substitute for intermediate (1.0 g/kg) but not higher (2.0 g/kg) ethanol training doses. Discrimination studies with ethanol and drugs acting on NMDA and GABA receptors consistently indicate asymmetrical generalization. For example, ethanol is able to generalize to barbiturates and benzodiazepines, but neither the benzodiazepine nor barbiturate response generalizes to ethanol. Only a few drugs are able to antagonize, at least to some extent, the discriminative stimulus of ethanol (e.g., partial inverse GABA-benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-4513 and the opioid antagonist naloxone). The ethanol stimulus effect may be increased (i.e., stronger recognition) by N-cholinergic drugs (nicotine), dopaminergic drugs (apomorphine), and 5-HT3 receptor agonists (m-chlorophenylbiguanide). Thus, the ethanol stimulus is composed of the several components, with the NMDA receptor and GABA(A) receptor complex being of particular importance. This suggests that a drug mixture may be more capable of substituting for ethanol (or block its stimulus) than a single compound. The ability of drugs to substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus is frequently, although not preclusively, associated with the reduction of voluntary ethanol consumption. The examples of positive correlation are gamma-hydroxybutyrate, possibly memantine and certain serotonergic drugs such as fluoxetine. However, it remains uncertain to what extent the discriminative stimulus of ethanol can be seen as relevant in the understanding of the complex mechanisms of dependence.

Discrimination of ethanol in rats: effects of nicotine, diazepam, CGP 40116, and 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide

The drug discrimination paradigm was used to evaluate the role of certain ligand-gated ion channels in the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol. Rats were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.0 g/kg) from saline vehicle under the FR10 schedule of sweetened milk reinforcement. The discrimination of lower ethanol doses was enhanced by either the GABA(A) receptor positive modulator, diazepam (0.5 mg/kg), or nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, nicotine (0.3 mg/kg). Neither diazepam nor nicotine produced any effect on the rate of responding. Both the NMDA receptor competitive antagonist, CGP 40116 (0.5 mg/kg) and the 5-HT) receptor agonist, 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide (5.0 mg/kg) enhanced the cueing properties of lower ethanol doses, but these effects were associated with a significant reduction in the response rate. The ethanol-like stimulus effects produced by diazepam or CGP 40116 were not influenced by 0.3 mg/kg nicotine. In contrast, CGP 40116 moderately enhanced the ethanol-like stimulus effects of diazepam. The present results show that: 1) pretreatment with nicotine, diazepam, CGP 40116 or 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide enhance the ethanol discrimination; 2) neither the GABA(A) nor the NMDA receptor complex alone is critically involved in the nicotine-induced enhancement of the ethanol discrimination; 3) NMDA receptor competitive antagonist and GABAergic benzodiazepine derivative may produce moderate additive effects in rats trained to discriminate ethanol.

Prior repeated exposure to a 5-HT3 receptor agonist does not alter the ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in rats

Several reports have indicated that the brain serotonergic 5-HT3 receptors are involved in at least some central effects of ethanol in rats. However, using an operant drug discrimination procedure, we have shown that these receptors are not primarily involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. The aim of the present study was to further elucidate the role of 5-HT3 receptors in the formation of the ethanol-cueing effects in rats. To this purpose, a crossfamiliarization conditioned taste aversion (CF-CTA) procedure was used. Four daily injections of 1.5 g/kg ethanol (10% v/v) resulted in a significant attenuation of the subsequent ethanol-induced CTA. In contrast, four daily injections of the 5-HT3 receptor agonist, 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide (mCPBG; 50 microg per rat, i.c.v.) did not alter the subsequent ethanol-induced CTA. The 50 microg dose of mCPBG produced a marked CTA in a control experiment. These results taken together with some previous findings from our laboratory suggest that the brain 5-HT3 receptors do not play any crucial role in the mediation of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol.

The discrimination and durability of an ethanol cue in young and mid-aged female mice

Young adult (6 months) and mid-aged (12 months) C57BL/6 mice both learned to discriminate ethanol (ETOH, 1.0 g/kg) although criterion performance occurred later for mid-aged mice. ETOH discrimination improved with increasing dose (0.25-1.0 g/kg) and the dose-response function was unaffected by age. The ETOH cue had declined by 40 min postinjection for young mice not unlike a previous report for young rats. In contrast, the ETOH cue remained discriminable at 40 min for mid-aged mice, an effect perhaps due to their slower rate of ETOH metabolism and accountable for the previously reported reduction in ethanol consumption by mid-aged mice. Retention tests and reacquisition training both indicated that the ETOH cue can be retained by both age groups for at least 60 days without discrimination training or food deprivation. The present study suggests that the ethanol discriminative cue in mid-aged mice does not differ from that in young adult mice in potency but is more long lasting, the latter perhaps being related to their reduced ethanol consumption. Of significance from a therapeutic perspective, is that the ETOH cue remained discriminable for 2 months in both age groups (i.e., approximately 1/12 of their total life span).

Genetics of alcoholism: simultaneous presentation of a chocolate drink diminishes alcohol preference in high drinking HAD rats

Through selective crossbreeding of the N/Nih heterogeneous stock of rats, two genetic lines of rats have been developed that are categorized by their preference for ethyl alcohol as high alcohol drinking (HAD) and low alcohol drinking (LAD) animals. Corresponding to other strains of rat bred for alcohol selection or rejection, they were subdivided on the basis of their intake of a solution of 10% alcohol vs. water. The present experiments were designed to determine whether the HAD-1 and LAD-1 lines are similar to the P and NP rats in their profile of alcohol consumption. Five successive three-bottle preference tests for alcohol drinking in the presence of water were undertaken in both HAD (n = 9) and LAD (n = 10) rats as follows: 10% alcohol for 5 days; 3-30% concentrations of alcohol increased over 11 days; the maximally preferred concentration of alcohol for 5 days; this maximally preferred concentration of alcohol plus either chocolate Slender for 5 days, or an aspartame solution for 5 days. The intake of alcohol of the LAD rats during the 10% test was 0.4 g/kg/day, whereas during the 3-30% test, the maximum intake was 1.7 g/kg/day; their maximally preferred concentrations ranged between 7% and 9% alcohol. In contrast, the intake of 10% alcohol of the HAD rats was 6.5 g/kg/day, whereas during the 3-30% test the mean daily intake was 6.6 g/kg/day; the maximally preferred solutions of the HAD rats ranged between 13 to 20%, with the mean maximum intake of 10.57 g/kg/day reached at the 20% concentration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Serotonin and alcohol intake, abuse, and dependence: findings of animal studies

Despite a relatively large body of literature on the role of the neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, or 5-HT) in the regulation of alcohol intake, the functional significance of serotonergic neurotransmission and its relationship to alcohol intake, abuse, and dependence remains to be fully elucidated. In part two of this review, the experimental (animal) data is summarized along two lines: the effects of serotonergic manipulations on the intake of alcohol, and the effects of acute and chronic alcohol intake, as well as the withdrawal of chronic alcohol, on the serotonergic system. It is concluded that serotonin mediates ethanol intake as a part of its larger role in behavior modulation, such that increases in serotonergic functioning decrease ethanol intake, and decreased serotonergic functioning increases ethanol intake. Ethanol produces transient increases in serotonergic functioning that activate the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward system. The results are discussed in light of recent theories describing the regulatory role of serotonin in general behavior.

Comparison of innate EEG parameters in rat lines selected for ethanol preference

Through bidirectional selective breeding, lines of rats that differ greatly in their voluntary alcohol drinking behavior have been developed--namely, the alcohol-preferring (P) and high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) lines and the alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) lines. The present experiments were designed to determine if an association exists between ethanol preference and features of the electroencephalogram (EEG) during various sleep-wake behaviors. Of the EEG parameters measured, only theta activity in the hippocampus revealed differences in the lines. However, these differences were not generally associated with ethanol preference. The peak frequency and distribution mean of hippocampal theta activity during REM sleep were significantly higher in NP rats than in P, HAD, and LAD rats. In addition, theta frequency during alert immobility tended to be higher in NP rats than in P, HAD, and LAD rats. A qualitative comparison of these data with published data from unselected rats further suggested that the NP rats are uniquely different with respect to theta frequency.