Discriminative stimulus effects of presynaptic GABA agonists in pentobarbital-trained rats

Comparing the discriminative stimulus effects of modulators of GABAA receptors containing α4-δ subunits with those of gaboxadol in rats

RATIONALE

Gaboxadol is a selective agonist at γ-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors that contain α4-δ subunits, and it produces anxiolytic and sedative effects. Although adverse effects preclude its clinical use, its mechanism of action suggests that those receptors might provide novel therapeutic targets, particularly for modulators of those GABAA receptor subtypes, by retaining therapeutic effects of gaboxadol and not adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

The current study compared discriminative stimulus effects of gaboxadol with those of modulators acting at GABAA receptors containing α4-δ subunits.

MATERIALS

Eight rats discriminated 5.6 mg/kg gaboxadol from vehicle while responding under a fixed - ratio 10 schedule for food. Modulators acting at GABAA receptors containing α4-δ subunits (pregnanolone, ethanol, and flumazenil) and receptors that do not contain those subunits (midazolam) were studied alone; pregnanolone and ethanol were also combined with gaboxadol. In addition, gaboxadol was studied in separate groups discriminating 0.32 mg/kg midazolam, 3.2 mg/kg pregnanolone, or 0.75 g/kg ethanol from vehicle.

RESULTS

Gaboxadol produced ≥80 % gaboxadol-lever responding and did not alter rates. No other drug produced, on average, ≥80 % drug-lever responding up to doses that decreased rates, although 1.78 mg/kg midazolam produced 32 % gaboxadol-lever responding. Ethanol and pregnanolone did not enhance the effects of gaboxadol. Rats discriminating midazolam, pregnanolone, or ethanol from vehicle responded predominantly on the vehicle lever after receiving gaboxadol.

CONCLUSIONS

Drugs that modulate GABAA receptors containing α4-δ subunits neither mimicked nor enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of gaboxadol, indicating that at least some effects of gaboxadol are not shared with modulators of that GABAA receptor subtype.

GABA(A) positive modulator and NMDA antagonist-like discriminative stimulus effects of isoflurane vapor in mice

RATIONALE

Several neurotransmitter systems have been hypothesized to be involved in the in vivo effects of volatile anesthetics. Drug discrimination may represent a novel procedure to explore the neurochemical systems underlying the sub-anesthetic behavioral effects of these compounds.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to examine the contribution of GABA(A) and NMDA receptors to the discriminative stimulus effects of a behaviorally active sub-anesthetic concentration of isoflurane vapor.

METHODS

Sixteen B6SJLF1/J mice were trained to discriminate 10 min of exposure to 6,000 ppm isoflurane vapor from air. Substitution tests were conducted with volatile anesthetics, abused vapors, GABA(A) positive modulators, NMDA antagonists, and nitrous oxide.

RESULTS

The volatile anesthetics, enflurane and halothane as well as the abused vapors toluene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane fully substituted for isoflurane. The GABA(A) positive modulators, pentobarbital, midazolam, and zaleplon but not the direct GABA(A) agonist, muscimol, produced high levels of partial substitution for isoflurane. The anticonvulsant, valproic acid fully substituted for isoflurane but a second, tiagabine, did not substitute. The competitive NMDA antagonist, CGS-19755, fully and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine, partially substituted for isoflurane. The glycine-site NMDA antagonist, L-701,324 did not substitute for isoflurane. Gamma-hydroxybutric acid and nitrous oxide gas also failed to substitute for isoflurane.

CONCLUSIONS

The discriminative stimulus effects of sub-anesthetic concentrations of isoflurane vapor are shared by other vapor anesthetics and abused inhalants. The discriminative stimulus effects of isoflurane vapor appear to be mediated by both positive allosteric modulation of GABA(A) receptors as well as antagonism of NMDA receptors.

Discriminative stimulus effects of tiagabine and related GABAergic drugs in rats

RATIONALE

Tiagabine is an anticonvulsant drug which may also have sleep-enhancing properties. It acts by inhibiting reuptake at the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter (GAT-1).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to determine whether tiagabine acted as a discriminative stimulus and, if so, whether other GABAergic compounds would generalise to it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats were trained to discriminate tiagabine (30 mg/kg p.o.) from vehicle, and generalisation to drugs that modulate GABA was assessed.

RESULTS

Gaboxadol (5-20 mg/kg p.o.), a selective extrasynaptic GABA A agonist, generalised to tiagabine, although the extent of the generalisation was inconclusive. Indiplon (1 mg/kg p.o.), a benzodiazepine-like hypnotic, also partially generalised to tiagabine, although zolpidem and S-zopiclone did not. Baclofen, a GABA B receptor agonist, and gabapentin, which increases synaptic GABA, did not generalise to tiagabine. (+)-Bicuculline (3 mg/kg i.p.), a GABA A receptor antagonist, blocked the tiagabine cue, but the less brain-penetrant salt form, bicuculline methochloride, had no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that tiagabine generates a discriminative stimulus in rats, and provides a central GABA-mediated cue, but is distinct from the other GABAergic compounds tested.

Gaboxadol, a selective extrasynaptic GABA(A) agonist, does not generalise to other sleep-enhancing drugs: a rat drug discrimination study

Gaboxadol is a selective extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptor agonist (SEGA) which enhances slow-wave sleep, and may act principally at extrasynaptic GABA(A)alpha4betadelta receptors. Drug discrimination is a very useful approach for exploring in vivo pharmacological similarities and differences between compounds and was therefore used to compare gaboxadol and zolpidem, an established hypnotic drug, against zopiclone, S-zopiclone, indiplon and tiagabine, all of which have been reported to enhance sleep. Gaboxadol generalised to itself, but not to zolpidem, zopiclone, S-zopiclone, R-zopiclone, indiplon or tiagabine. By contrast, zolpidem generalised to itself, zopiclone, S-zopiclone and indiplon, but not to R-zopiclone (the inactive enantiomer of zopiclone), gaboxadol or tiagabine. This suggests that zolpidem, zopiclone, S-zopiclone and indiplon share a discriminative stimulus, which may be mediated by their efficacy at GABA(A)alpha1betagamma receptors. Gaboxadol and tiagabine each have a different discriminative stimulus from all the other drugs tested.

GHB: a new and novel drug of abuse

There has been increasing attention in the United States to problems of abuse of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), with some evidence for problems in other parts of the world as well. In vitro and animal research show that, while GHB shares some properties with abused central nervous system depressant drugs, it has unique aspects of its pharmacology as well, including actions at a specific neural receptor which probably mediates many of its effects. Abuse potential assessment of GHB using standard animal models has not yielded a picture of a highly abusable substance, but little human testing has yet been done. Very little systematic data exist on tolerance and dependence with GHB, but both have been seen in human users. Quantitative data on the prevalence of GHB abuse is incomplete, but various qualitative measures indicate that a mini-epidemic of abuse began in the late 1980s and continues to the present. GHB is often included with the group of 'club drugs', and can be used as an intoxicant. It also has been used as a growth promoter and sleep aid and has been implicated in cases of 'date rape', usually in combination with alcohol. Undoubtedly the easy availability of GHB and some of its precursors has contributed to its popularity. Recent changes in the control status of GHB in the US may reduce its availability with as yet unknown consequences for the scope of the public health problem. Drug abuse experts need to familiarize themselves with GHB as possibly representing a new type of drug abuse problem with some unique properties.

Lack of tolerance to the anticonvulsant effects of tiagabine following chronic (21 day) treatment

The anticonvulsant, and side effect, profile of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) uptake inhibitor (R)-N-(4,4-di-(3-methylthien-2-yl)but-3-enyl) nipecotic acid hydrochloride (tiagabine) was examined in mice following chronic (21 day) administration. Twenty-four hours following the discontinuation of the 21 days' treatment with twice daily administration of vehicle or tiagabine at 15 or 30 mg/kg p.o., an ED50 for tiagabine was determined for the anticonvulsant effect, the rotarod performance, the traction response and the inhibition of locomotor activity in the animals treated with vehicle only, and in the groups previously treated with 15 or 30 mg/kg p.o. of tiagabine. There was no significant decrease in the anticonvulsant efficacy of acutely administered tiagabine (ED50 for inhibition of methyl 6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-2-carboxylate (DMCM)-induced seizures of 1.7 +/- 0.4, 1.9 +/- 0.3, and 2.0 +/- 0.50 mg/kg i.p., respectively). However, there was a significant decrease in the ability of acutely administered tiagabine to impair rotarod performance (ED50 of 5.9 +/- 1.2, 14 +/- 1.9 and 21 +/- 2.7 mg/kg i.p., respectively), inhibit a traction response (ED50 of 10 +/- 1.6, 23 +/- 3.0 and 34 +/- 4.6 mg/kg i.p., respectively), and to inhibit exploratory locomotor activity (ED50 of 13 +/- 23, 19 +/- 2.6 and 28 +/- 38 mg/kg i.p. respectively). Following the discontinuation of chronic tiagabine administration there was no change in pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) seizure threshold, animal weight or gross behavior, suggesting the lack of a behavioral withdrawal syndrome. The production of tolerance to the sedative and ataxic effects, but not the anticonvulsant effects, of tiagabine suggests that tiagabine may be a useful agent for the long-term treatment of epilepsy.