Comparison of platelet-activating factor-induced chemotaxis of normodense and hypodense eosinophils

Asthma

Asthma has been recognized as a disease since the earliest times. In the Corpus Hippocraticum, Hippocrates used the term “ασθμα” to indicate any form of breathing difficulty manifesting itself by panting. Aretaeus of Cappadocia, a well-known Greek physician (second century A.D.), is credited with providing the first detailed description of an asthma attack [13], and to Celsus it was a disease with wheezing and noisy, violent breathing. In the history of Rome, we find many members of the Julio-Claudian family affected with probable atopic respiratory disorders: Caesar Augustus suffered from bronchoconstriction, seasonal rhinitis as well as a highly pruritic skin disease. Claudius suffered from rhinoconjunctivitis and Britannicus was allergic to horse dander [529]. Maimonides (1136–1204) warned that to neglect treatment of asthma could prove fatal, whereas until the 19th century, European scholars defined it as “nervous asthma,” a term that was given to mean a defect of conductivity of the ninth pair of cranial nerves.

Eosinophils isolated by magnetic cell sorting respond poorly to lipid chemoattractants

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils play an important role in allergic inflammation. In vitro methods to isolate human eosinophils for the study of chemotactic responses are essential in understanding the mechanisms involved in tissue eosinophilia.

OBJECTIVE

We compared LTB4 and PAF-induced chemotactic responses of eosinophils isolated by the standard Percoll (positive selection) versus the magnetic cell separation systems (MACS) (negative selection) technique.

METHODS

Discontinuous Percoll gradients were preceded by dextran and Ficoll-Paque steps, and followed by gelatin wash and red blood cell (RBC) lysis. MACS isolation included Percoll 1.090 g/mL layering and RBC lysis; incubation with CD16 antibody conjugated to magnetic beads (to bind neutrophils); and isolation of eluate from column positioned in magnet.

RESULTS

Percoll-isolated eosinophils migrated to the lipid mediators, LTB4 and PAF, in a dose-responsive fashion. Although MACS isolation provided a greater number and higher purity of eosinophils, these eosinophils migrated less to LTB4 and PAF. Neither dextran sedimentation, dextran and Ficoll-Paque, nor dextran Ficoll-Paque and Percoll prior to MACS isolation reversed the decreased chemotactic responses observed with MACS isolated eosinophils. Further, Percoll-isolated eosinophils further purified with CD16 MicroBeads did not respond as well to LTB4 or PAF.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique used to isolate eosinophils clearly affects the chemotactic responsiveness of this cell to LTB4 and PAF. Since several in vivo studies suggest that LTB4 and PAF are eosinophil chemoattractants, Percoll isolation of these cells might be more appropriate for studies involving eosinophil chemotactic responses to these lipid mediators.

PAF-induced eosinophil chemotaxis increases during an asthmatic attack and is inhibited by prednisolone in vivo and in vitro

We investigated platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced migration in eosinophils obtained from asthmatic patients who were treated with or without intravenous prednisolone. The migration of asthmatic eosinophils in remission and during an attack was significantly greater than that in healthy volunteers. The migration of asthmatic eosinophils exposed to prednisolone in vivo and in vitro was significantly inhibited, compared to asthmatic eosinophils not exposed to prednisolone. These findings suggest that an intracellular factor causes asthmatic eosinophils to migrate, and that prednisolone inhibits PAF-induced eosinophil migration.

Isolation technique alters eosinophil migration response to IL-8

Disparate reports exist on the eosinophil chemotactic capacity of interleukin-8 (IL-8). We hypothesized that the difference is due to the methods used to purify eosinophils. We therefore compared the eosinophilotactic capacity of IL-8 on human cells isolated by Percoll (positive selection) vs. magnetic cell separation system (MACS) (negative selection). Discontinuous Percoll gradients were preceded by dextran and Ficoll-Paque steps, and followed by gelatin wash and red blood cell (RBC) lysis. MACS isolation included: Percoll 1.090 g/ml layering and RBC lysis; incubation with CD16 antibody conjugated to magnetic beads (to bind neutrophils); and isolation of eluate from column positioned in magnet. Percoll isolated eosinophils migrated to IL-8 in a dose-responsive fashion. Although MACS isolation provided a greater number and higher purity of eosinophils, these eosinophils did not migrate to IL-8. Neither dextran sedimentation, Ficoll-Paque and Percoll prior to, nor Percoll discontinuous gradients subsequent to, MACS isolation reversed the negative chemotactic response. Moreover, Percoll-isolated eosinophils further purified with CD16 MicroBeads no longer chemotactically responded to IL-8. This inhibition was not due to change in eosinophil purity, a loss of eosinophil adhesion molecules or activation markers, the presence of a soluble neutrophil or eosinophil inhibitor or the effect of the magnet. Thus, the technique used to isolate eosinophils clearly affects the chemotactic responsiveness of this cell to IL-8. Since several in vivo studies suggest that IL-8 is an eosinophil chemoattractant, Percoll isolation of these cells might be more appropriate for studies involving eosinophil chemotactic responses to IL-8.

Eosinophil migration in response to three molecular species of platelet activating factor

Multiple molecular species of the eosinophil chemoattractant platelet activating factor (PAF) are produced as a result of inflammatory processes. We therefore compared the ability of three naturally occurring PAF species (C16:0, C18:0, and C18:1), which only varied at carbon 1, to induce eosinophil chemotaxis through naked 3-microns pore polycarbonate filters. Timecourse experiments indicated that all species of PAF tested induced significant and equivalent eosinophil migration at 1 h which peaked at 2 h. Overall, the rank order of chemotactic potency for the PAF species was relatively equivalent. The specific PAF antagonist WEB 2086 inhibited eosinophil migration induced by all three PAF species equally. We conclude that the degree of PAF-induced eosinophil migration is not dependent upon the molecular species of PAF.

Cytokines induce selective granulocyte chemotactic responses

Neutrophils, eosinophils and cytokines are important in allergic airway inflammatory responses. However, it is unclear how cytokines selectively influence neutrophils versus eosinophils to migrate to an inflammatory site. The cytokines, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), interleukin (IL)-1alpha, IL-5, IL-8, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), are released subsequent to allergic reactions and affect both neutrophil and eosinophil functions. We studied whether these cytokines differed in capacity to induce human neutrophil versus eosinophil migration through naked filters and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) and human pulmonary type II-like epithelial (A549) cell monolayers grown on filters. Dose-response experiments using all barriers were performed for each granulocyte and cytokine. TGF-beta1 did not induce granulocyte migration. IL-5 induced eosinophil migration only through naked filters. IL-1alpha stimulated neutrophil migration through cellular barriers, but not through naked filters. TNF-alpha and GM-CSF induced neutrophil and eosinophil migration through filters, but only neutrophil migration through cellular monolayers. Only IL-8 induced significant neutrophil and eosinophil migration; however, there were clear-cut differences between the neutrophilotactic and eosinophilotactic responses through all barriers employed. Thus, our data show that these cytokines induce distinct chemotactic responses for neutrophils versus eosinophils. Moreover, by using relevant cellular barriers versus naked filters, our data better examines the capability of these cytokines to induce selective granulocyte migration to an inflammatory site in lung diseases such as asthma.

Platelet-activating factor-induced human eosinophil transendothelial migration: evidence for a dynamic role of the endothelium

Stimulated migration of eosinophils out of the bloodstream and into the lung is key in the development of tissue eosinophilia and inflammation in asthma. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) has been implicated as an important inflammatory mediator in asthma pathogenesis in part because of its chemotactic capacity. We therefore studied the ability of PAF to induce human peripheral blood eosinophil migration through naked filters and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) cultured on these filters. PAF induced eosinophil migration through both barriers in a time-dependent fashion, with maximal eosinophil migration occurring at 180 min. Significant eosinophil migration was observed at PAF concentration > or = 0.1 microM and was dose dependent up to 10.0 microM. No significant differences in eosinophil chemotactic responses were noted between naked filter and HUVEC barriers. The PAF receptor antagonist, WEB 2086, inhibited (> 85%) eosinophil transendothelial migration when co-incubated with PAF or when used as a pretreatment of either the eosinophils or HUVECs. However, WEB 2086 pretreatment of HUVECs did not inhibit PAF-induced neutrophil transendothelial migration, nor did it affect leukotriene B4-induced neutrophil or eosinophil transendothelial migration. Thus, the data indicate that the endothelial cell plays an important role in PAF-induced eosinophil inflammatory processes. Moreover, these data suggest that PAF's pathogenic role in asthma may in part be due to its ability to stimulate eosinophil migration across endothelial barriers and into the airways.