The effect of local hyperthermia on allergen-induced nasal congestion and mediator release

Comparison of norepinephrine responsiveness of mucosal veins in vivo with that of isolated mucosal tissue in vitro in guinea pig nasal mucosa

BACKGROUND

The vascular responsiveness of nasal mucosa has been determined frequently by using isolated mucosal tissues although it is not clear whether the response of the whole tissue truly reflects the response of the vasculature (especially veins) in mucosa. In this study, the in vivo responsiveness of mucosal veins was compared with in vitro responsiveness of isolated mucosal tissue in guinea pig nasal septa.

METHODS

The in vivo venous responsiveness to norepinephrine (NE) of guinea pig nasal septal mucosa was measured by changes in the diameters of mucosal veins, stereomicroscopically. The in vitro responsiveness to NE of isolated nasal septal mucosae from guinea pigs also was determined by standard organ-bath technique.

RESULTS

Application of NE induced concentration-dependent contractile responses both in vivo and in vitro with the pD2 (negative logarithm for 50% effective concentration [M] of NE) values of 5.23 +/- 0.29 and 5.00 +/- 0.17, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The equal potencies obtained by the in vivo and in vitro experiments suggest that an increase in tension of isolated nasal mucosal tissue might be caused by the contraction of mucosal veins. Both the in vivo and the in vitro methods used in this study might be useful for determining vasoreactivity of nasal mucosa in experimental animals.

Expression and localization of heat shock proteins in rat basophilic leukemia cells: differential modulation by degranulation, thermal or oxidative stress

BACKGROUND

Rat basophilic leukemia (RBL-2H3) cells are well characterized in terms of morphological and biochemical changes upon activation, and have been extensively used as a model system for studying the mechanisms of the immediate hypersensitivity reaction. To investigate whether overexpression of heat shock/stress proteins (HSP) is involved in the mast cell-dependent reactivity, we examined the adaptive responses of RBL-2H3 cells to classical stress conditions such as heat shock or oxidative injury produced by an aqueous extract of tobacco smoke.

METHODS

HSP were determined by flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. Degranulation was confirmed as the release of beta-hexosaminidase, determined spectrophotometrically, and by electron microscopy experiments.

RESULTS

We found that RBL-2H3 cells respond to heat shock or oxidative injury by the synthesis of both the inducible 72 kDa HSP (Hsp70), and the oxidation-specific 32 kDa heme oxygenase (HO)-1. Heat shock induced mainly Hsp70 in a cell growth-dependent manner, whereas oxidative stress induced mainly HO-1 in a cell growth-independent manner. However, heat shock or oxidative stress had no significant effects on degranulation.

CONCLUSION

Stress-mediated synthesis of HSP was not associated with RBL-2H3 degranulation and likewise, degranulation did not induce HSP.

Hot, humid air increases cellular influx during the late-phase response to nasal challenge with antigen

BACKGROUND

Inhalation of hot, humid air (HHA: 37 degrees C, > 95% relative humidity (RH)) partially inhibits the early response to nasal challenge with antigen.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether HHA inhibited the late-phase response to nasal challenge with antigen and increased hyper-responsiveness of the nasal mucosa to histamine.

METHODS

Twenty subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis, outside of their allergy season, participated in a randomized, 2-way cross-over study. The subjects continuously breathed room air (25 degrees C, 30% RH) or HHA delivered via a face mask during the entire experiment. Subjects were challenged intranasally with antigen 1 h after beginning conditioning. The response was monitored by symptoms and nasal lavage at 2-h intervals after the last antigen challenge. Eight hours after antigen challenge, nasal challenge with histamine was performed.

RESULTS

Exposure to HHA significantly increased nasal mucosal temperature from baseline without affecting nasal secretion osmolality. HHA significantly inhibited antigen-induced sneezes, congestion, pruritus, and human serum albumin levels during the early response to antigen challenge. HHA exposure, however, was associated with an 8-fold increase in the eosinophil influx and a 15-fold increase in the levels of eosinophil cationic protein during the late-phase response compared to room air. There were no significant differences in nasal hyper-responsiveness to histamine during either exposure.

CONCLUSION

HHA partially decreases the early response to nasal challenge with antigen, but dramatically increases eosinophil influx. Increasing eosinophil number had no effects on the hyper-responsiveness to histamine. We speculate that the physical conditions of air differentially impact the stages of allergic inflammation.

Treatment with hot, humid air reduces the nasal response to allergen challenge

Ten subjects with asymptomatic seasonal allergy, outside of their allergy season, underwent allergen provocation following 1 hour of exposure to air at either 20 degrees C and 30% relative humidity (RH) or air at 37 degrees C and 90% RH. The ipsilateral changes following antigen challenge were compared under the two conditions. Conditioning of the nose to 37 degrees C, 90% RH reduced total histamine release (7.9 +/- 1.8 ng vs 4.2 +/- 1.3 ng; p < or = 0.05), sneezes (6 +/- 2 vs 3 +/- 1; p < or = 0.05), pruritus (score of 17.4 +/- 6.0 vs score of 2.0 +/- 1.8 out of a total score of 100, p < or = 0.01), nasal airway resistance (1.4 +/- 0.8 kPa/L/sec vs 0.2 +/- 0.1 kPa/L/sec; p < or = 0.05), human serum albumin levels (389.6 +/- 53.4 micrograms vs 242.2 +/- 37.9 micrograms; p < or = 0.05), and congestion (score of 23.8 +/- 4.8 vs score of 10.6 +/- 5.4 out of a total score of 100, p < or = 0.01). It had no effect on the volume of secretions (p = 0.8), lactoferrin levels (p = 0.3), or rhinorrhea (p = 1.0). Thus air at 37 degrees C and 90% RH partially reduces the early response to antigen. Its effects are greatest on histamine release, the vascular response, and neural responses, with no effect on the glandular response. The mechanisms underlying these effects are unknown.

Lack of effect of hot, humid air on response to nasal challenge with histamine

We have previously shown that whole body exposure of human subjects to environmental conditions of 37 degrees C and 90% relative humidity (RH) prior to and during nasal challenge with antigen decreases the early response. In this study, we evaluated 1) whether the decreased responses observed resulted from decreased end organ sensitivity to histamine and 2) whether the effect of hot, humid air persisted after the subject exited the hot, humid environment. Ten asymptomatic seasonal allergic subjects and 11 nonallergic subjects were randomized to environmental chamber conditions of either 20 degrees C, 30% RH or 37 degrees C, 90% RH for 1 hour prior to and during performance of a nasal challenge with histamine. Twenty-two hours after exiting the environmental chamber, the allergic subjects were challenged with antigen. During both chamber conditions, histamine challenge was associated with a significant increase in all measured parameters compared to sham challenge, except for the sensations of pruritus and congestion. The response to histamine challenge was not different under the two experimental conditions or between allergic and nonallergic subjects. Following both exposure conditions, allergen challenge was associated with an increase in all measured parameters compared to sham challenge, with no significant difference between the two conditions. Exposure to 37 degrees C, 90% RH minimally affects the response to nasal challenge with histamine, and thus, the previously reported decreases in the early nasal response to antigen may primarily result from reduction in mast cell activation. The effect on antigen does not persist 22 hours after exposure.