Differences in the DNA of the inactive X chromosomes of fetal and extraembryonic tissues of mice

Characterization of Histone Modifications Associated with Inactive X-Chromosome in Trophoblast Stem Cells, eXtra-Embryonic Endoderm Cells and in In Vitro Derived Undifferentiated and Differentiated Epiblast Like Stem Cells

In mouse, X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) can either be imprinted or random. Imprinted XCI (iXCI) is considered unstable and depending on continuous Xist expression, whereas random XCI (rXCI) is stably maintained even in the absence of Xist. Here we have systematically examined epigenetic modifications associated with the inactive X-chromosome (Xi) in Trophoblast Stem cells, eXtra-Embryonic Endoderm Cells, undifferentiated and differentiated Epiblast Like Stem Cells in order to understand intrinsic differences in epigenetic mechanisms involved in silencing of the inactive X-chromosome in lineages presenting iXCI and rXCI. Whereas euchromatic histone modifications are predominantly lost from the Xi territory in all cell types, the accumulation of heterochromatic modifications diverges in between the analysed cell lineages. Particularly, only the Xi of multipotent Trophoblast (iXCI) and Epiblast stem cells (rXCI) display a visible accumulation of Polycomb Repressive Complexes (PRCs), in contrast to the Xi in differentiated Epiblast Like Stem Cells and eXtra-embryonic Endoderm cells. Despite this, the histone modifications catalysed by PRCs, ubH2AK119 and H3K27me3, remain the best heterochromatic markers for the Xi in all assessed lineages. Heterochromatic chromatin modifications associated with the Xi are a reflection of the epigenetic landscape of the entire genome of the assessed cell regardless whether XCI is imprinted or random.

Establishment of X chromosome inactivation and epigenomic features of the inactive X depend on cellular contexts

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is an essential epigenetic process that ensures X-linked gene dosage equilibrium between sexes in mammals. XCI is dynamically regulated during development in a manner that is intimately linked to differentiation. Numerous studies, which we review here, have explored the dynamics of X inactivation and reactivation in the context of development, differentiation and diseases, and the phenotypic and molecular link between the inactive status, and the cellular context. Here, we also assess whether XCI is a uniform mechanism in mammals by analyzing epigenetic signatures of the inactive X (Xi) in different species and cellular contexts. It appears that the timing of XCI and the epigenetic signature of the inactive X greatly vary between species. Surprisingly, even within a given species, various Xi configurations are found across cellular states. We discuss possible mechanisms underlying these variations, and how they might influence the fate of the Xi.

X-chromosome inactivation in development and cancer

X-chromosome inactivation represents an epigenetics paradigm and a powerful model system of facultative heterochromatin formation triggered by a non-coding RNA, Xist, during development. Once established, the inactive state of the Xi is highly stable in somatic cells, thanks to a combination of chromatin associated proteins, DNA methylation and nuclear organization. However, sporadic reactivation of X-linked genes has been reported during ageing and in transformed cells and disappearance of the Barr body is frequently observed in cancer cells. In this review we summarise current knowledge on the epigenetic changes that accompany X inactivation and discuss the extent to which the inactive X chromosome may be epigenetically or genetically perturbed in breast cancer.

Unusual chromatin status and organization of the inactive X chromosome in murine trophoblast giant cells

Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) enables dosage compensation between XX females and XY males. It is an essential process and its absence in XX individuals results in early lethality due primarily to extra-embryonic defects. This sensitivity to X-linked gene dosage in extra-embryonic tissues is difficult to reconcile with the reported tendency of escape from XCI in these tissues. The precise transcriptional status of the inactive X chromosome in different lineages has mainly been examined using transgenes or in in vitro differentiated stem cells and the degree to which endogenous X-linked genes are silenced in embryonic and extra-embryonic lineages during early postimplantation stages is unclear. Here we investigate the precise temporal and lineage-specific X-inactivation status of several genes in postimplantation mouse embryos. We find stable gene silencing in most lineages, with significant levels of escape from XCI mainly in one extra-embryonic cell type: trophoblast giant cells (TGCs). To investigate the basis of this epigenetic instability, we examined the chromatin structure and organization of the inactive X chromosome in TGCs obtained from ectoplacental cone explants. We find that the Xist RNA-coated X chromosome has a highly unusual chromatin content in TGCs, presenting both heterochromatic marks such as H3K27me3 and euchromatic marks such as histone H4 acetylation and H3K4 methylation. Strikingly, Xist RNA does not form an overt silent nuclear compartment or Cot1 hole in these cells. This unusual combination of silent and active features is likely to reflect, and might underlie, the partial activity of the X chromosome in TGCs.

An integrative analysis of DNA methylation and RNA-Seq data for human heart, kidney and liver

Background

Many groups, including our own, have proposed the use of DNA methylation profiles as biomarkers for various disease states. While much research has been done identifying DNA methylation signatures in cancer vs. normal etc., we still lack sufficient knowledge of the role that differential methylation plays during normal cellular differentiation and tissue specification. We also need thorough, genome level studies to determine the meaning of methylation of individual CpG dinucleotides in terms of gene expression.

Results

In this study, we have used (insert statistical method here) to compile unique DNA methylation signatures from normal human heart, lung, and kidney using the Illumina Infinium 27 K methylation arraysand compared those to gene expression by RNA sequencing. We have identified unique signatures of global DNA methylation for human heart, kidney and liver, and showed that DNA methylation data can be used to correctly classify various tissues. It indicates that DNA methylation reflects tissue specificity and may play an important role in tissue differentiation. The integrative analysis of methylation and RNA-Seq data showed that gene methylation and its transcriptional levels were comprehensively correlated. The location of methylation markers in terms of distance to transcription start site and CpG island showed no effects on the regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation in normal tissues.

Conclusions

This study showed that an integrative analysis of methylation array and RNA-Seq data can be utilized to discover the global regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation and suggests that DNA methylation plays an important role in normal tissue differentiation via modulation of gene expression.

Difference between random and imprinted X inactivation in common voles

During early development in female mammals, most genes on one of the two X-chromosomes undergo transcriptional silencing. In the extraembryonic lineages of some eutherian species, imprinted X-inactivation of the paternal X-chromosome occurs. In the cells of the embryo proper, the choice of the future inactive X-chromosome is random. We mapped several genes on the X-chromosomes of five common vole species and compared their expression and methylation patterns in somatic and extraembryonic tissues, where random and imprinted X-inactivation occurs, respectively. In extraembryonic tissues, more genes were expressed on the inactive X-chromosome than in somatic tissues. We also found that the methylation status of the X-linked genes was always in accordance with their expression pattern in somatic, but not in extraembryonic tissues. The data provide new evidence that imprinted X-inactivation is less complete and/or stable than the random form and DNA methylation contributes less to its maintenance.

Epigenetics in development

It has become increasingly evident in recent years that development is under epigenetic control. Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene function that occur independently of alterations to primary DNA sequence. The best-studied epigenetic modifications are DNA methylation, and changes in chromatin structure by histone modifications, and histone exchange. An exciting, new chapter in the field is the finding that long-distance chromosomal interactions also modify gene expression. Epigenetic modifications are key regulators of important developmental events, including X-inactivation, genomic imprinting, patterning by Hox genes and neuronal development. This primer covers these aspects of epigenetics in brief, and features an interview with two epigenetic scientists.

Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome

Mammalian females have two X chromosomes and males have only one. This has led to the evolution of special mechanisms of dosage compensation. The inactivation of one X chromosome in females equalizes gene expression between the sexes. This process of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a remarkable example of long-range, monoallelic gene silencing and facultative heterochromatin formation, and the questions surrounding it have fascinated biologists for decades. How does the inactivation of more than a thousand genes on one X chromosome take place while the other X chromosome, present in the same nucleus, remains genetically active? What are the underlying mechanisms that trigger the initial differential treatment of the two X chromosomes? How is this differential treatment maintained once it has been established, and how are some genes able to escape the process? Does the mechanism of X inactivation vary between species and even between lineages? In this review, X inactivation is considered in evolutionary terms, and we discuss recent insights into the epigenetic changes and developmental timing of this process. We also review the discovery and possible implications of a second form of dosage compensation in mammals that deals with the unique, potentially haploinsufficient, status of the X chromosome with respect to autosomal gene expression.

Genetics, epigenetics and gene silencing in differentiating mammalian embryos

A highly complex pattern of differentiation involving maternal and embryonic factors characterizes the early development of mammalian embryos. These complex genetic and proteonomic patterns of early growth also involve various forms of gene silencing and tissue reprogramming. Understanding the nature of fundamental developmental events is hence essential to appreciate the significance of natural and induced forms of remodelling, damaged forms of gene expression and gene silencing during the initial stages of growth. Natural forms of remodelling include subtle genetic events involved in, for example, the changing nature of imprinting from before fertilization or the inactivation of one X chromosome in female blastocysts. Induced forms include the consequences of nuclear transfer and embryo cloning or the immediate effects of placing embryos in culture media. Animal and human studies are described in this paper, relating reprogramming to detailed embryological and clinical knowledge gained through the use of IVF, preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the establishment in vitro of stem cells. Attention concentrates on the consequences of variations in all growth stages from the formation of oocytes, through fertilization, the differentiation of blastocysts and early haemopoietic stages in mammalian species. Unique features of gene expression or gene modification are described for each developmental stage.

Delving into the diversity of facultative heterochromatin: the epigenetics of the inactive X chromosome

X chromosome inactivation represents one of the most dramatic examples of mono-allelic gene expression and long-term gene-silencing in mammals. The key regulatory molecule that triggers silencing is the Xist transcript, but little is known about its repressive action. Some progress has been made in deciphering the epigenetics of the inactive state that it triggers, however. During pre-implantation development, the inactive state is relatively labile. Later on, in the soma, the inactive state is highly stable and clonally heritable. This is ensured by the panoply of epigenetic modifications that characterize the inactive X and, presumably, is also a result of its spatio-temporal segregation. The inactive X chromosome has been associated with an increasing number of histone modifications, and several recent studies have implicated Polycomb group proteins in laying down some of these marks. Thanks to genetic and biochemical approaches to analyse these proteins, the epigenetic tapestry of the inactive X is just beginning to be unravelled. Lineage-specific differences provide a glimpse into the developmental complexity of the epigenetic marks that ensure the inactive state.

Cytological evaluation of global DNA methylation in mouse testicular genome

Global methylation of DNA from different testicular cell types has been studied by DNA end-labeling and nick translation of fixed chromatin (in situ), following digestion with cytosine methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. Both at the level of chromatic (chromosome) and naked DNA, there is extensive methylation of the genome. Although the extent of methylation was nearly the same among different cell types in the MspI, HpaII, and HhaI digested end-labelled DNA, in the chromosome preparations the digestion patterns varied in cell type-specific manner, pachytene being the most sensitive and spermatids and sperm the most resistant. The differential sensitivity is attributable to the difference in the chromatin organisation in different testicular cell types though no specific region could be identified as particularly more sensitive or resistant to the enzymes. Pachytene bivalents do not reveal a consistent segmental pattern of digestion, but the perichiasmate regions of diplotene/diakinesis and metaphase I chromosomes show hypersensitivity to the enzymes.

X-chromosome inactivation: closing in on proteins that bind Xist RNA

X inactivation is the developmentally regulated silencing of a single X chromosome in XX female mammals. In recent years, the Xist gene has been revealed as the master regulatory switch controlling this process. Parental imprinting and/or counting mechanisms ensure that Xist is expressed only on the inactive X chromosome. Chromosome silencing then results from the accumulation of the Xist RNA silencing signal, in cis, over the entire length of the X chromosome. A key issue has been to identify the factors that interact with Xist RNA to initiate heritable gene silencing. This review discusses recent progress that has put this goal in sight.

X inactivation in the mouse embryo deficient for Dnmt1: distinct effect of hypomethylation on imprinted and random X inactivation

It has been suggested that DNA methylation plays a crucial role in genomic imprinting and X inactivation. Using DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1)-deficient mouse embryos carrying X-linked lacZ transgenes, we studied the effects of genomic demethylation on X inactivation. Based on the expression pattern of lacZ, the imprinted X inactivation in the visceral endoderm, a derivative of the extraembryonic lineage, was unaffected in Dnmt1 mutant embryos at the time other imprinted genes showed aberrant expression. Random X inactivation in the embryonic lineage of Dnmt1 mutant embryos, however, was unstable as a result of hypomethylation, causing reactivation of, at least, one lacZ transgene that had initially been repressed. Our results suggest that maintenance of imprinted X inactivation in the extraembryonic lineage can tolerate extensive demethylation while normal levels of methylation are required for stable maintenance of X inactivation in the embryonic lineage.

Effects of X chromosome number and parental origin on X-linked gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos

Diploid androgenetic mouse embryos, possessing two sets of paternally inherited chromosomes, and control fertilized embryos were used to examine the relative effects of X chromosome number and parental chromosome origin on androgenone viability and X-linked gene expression. A significant difference in efficiency of blastocyst formation was observed between XX and XY androgenones in some experiments, but this difference was not uniformly observed. Significant effects of both X chromosome number and parental origin on X-linked gene expression were observed. Male and female control embryos expressed the XIST: RNA initially. This expression was followed by a preferential reduction in XIST: RNA abundance in male embryos, indicating that dosage compensation for the X chromosome may normally require the downregulation of XIST: RNA expression in male embryos, in conjunction with the production of stable XIST: transcripts in female embryos. By the late blastocyst stage, XX control embryos expressed significantly more XIST: RNA than did XY embryos. Unlike their normal counterparts, XX androgenones did not express significantly more XIST: RNA than did XY androgenones at the late blastocyst stage. Androgenones exhibited severe repression of the Pgk1 gene, but during development to the late blastocyst stage Pgk1 mRNA expression increased in XX androgenones and decreased in XY androgenones. Thus, the initial repression of the Pgk1 gene in XX androgenones was lost as the XIST: RNA declined in abundance, and this loss was correlated with a failure of XX androgenones to express significantly more XIST: RNA than did XY androgenones. These results indicate that androgenones may lack a factor that is expressed from the maternal genome and required for dosage compensation in preimplantation embryos. The results also indicate that early dosage compensation in preimplantation embryos may normally be reversible, thus providing flexibility to meet different developmental requirements of the embryonic and extraembryonic lineages.

Histone macroH2A1.2 relocates to the inactive X chromosome after initiation and propagation of X-inactivation

The histone macroH2A1.2 has been implicated in X chromosome inactivation on the basis of its accumulation on the inactive X chromosome (Xi) of adult female mammals. We have established the timing of macroH2A1.2 association with the Xi relative to the onset of X-inactivation in differentiating murine embryonic stem (ES) cells using immuno-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Before X-inactivation we observe a single macroH2A1.2-dense region in both undifferentiated XX and XY ES cells that does not colocalize with X inactive specific transcript (Xist) RNA, and thus appears not to associate with the X chromosome(s). This pattern persists through early stages of differentiation, up to day 7. Then the frequency of XY cells containing a macroH2A1.2-rich domain declines. In contrast, in XX cells there is a striking relocalization of macroH2A1.2 to the Xi. Relocalization occurs in a highly synchronized wave over a 2-d period, indicating a precisely regulated association. The timing of macroH2A1.2 accumulation on the Xi suggests it is not necessary for the initiation or propagation of random X-inactivation.

Epigenetic modification and imprinting of the mammalian genome during development

Genomic imprinting in mammals results in the differential expression of maternal and paternal alleles of certain genes. Recent observations have revealed that the regulation of imprinted genes is only partially determined by epigenetic modifications imposed on the two parental genomes during gametogenesis. Additional modifications mediated by factors in the ooplasm, early embryo, or developing embryonic tissues appear to be involved in establishing monoallelic expression for a majority of imprinted genes. As a result, genomic imprinting effects may be manifested in a stage-specific or cell type-specific manner. The developmental aspects of imprinting are reviewed here, and the available molecular data that address the mechanism of allele silencing for three specific imprinted gene domains are considered within the context of explaining how the imprinted gene silencing may be controlled developmentally.

Reactivation of XIST in normal fibroblasts and a somatic cell hybrid: abnormal localization of XIST RNA in hybrid cells

The XIST gene, expressed only from the inactive X chromosome, is a critical component of X inactivation. Although apparently unnecessary for maintenance of inactivation, XIST expression is thought to be sufficient for inactivation of genes in cis even when XIST is located abnormally on another chromosome. This repression appears to involve the association of XIST RNA with the chromosome from which it is expressed. Reactivated genes on the inactive X chromosome, however, maintain expression in several somatic cell hybrid lines with stable expression of XIST. We describe here another example of an XIST-expressing human-hamster hybrid that lacks X-linked gene repression in which the human XIST gene present on an active X chromosome was reactivated by treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. These data raise the possibility that human XIST RNA does not function properly in human-rodent somatic cell hybrids. As part of our approach to address this question, we reactivated the XIST gene in normal male fibroblasts and then compared their patterns of XIST RNA localization by subcellular fractionation and in situ hybridization with those of hybrid cells. Although XIST RNA is nuclear in all cell types, we found that the in situ signals are much more diffuse in hybrids than in human cells. These data suggest that hybrids lack components needed for XIST localization and, presumably, XIST-mediated gene repression.

X-chromosome inactivation in mammals

The inactive X chromosome differs from the active X in a number of ways; some of these, such as allocyclic replication and altered histone acetylation, are associated with all types of epigenetic silencing, whereas others, such as DNA methylation, are of more restricted use. These features are acquired progressively by the inactive X after onset of initiation. Initiation of X-inactivation is controlled by the X-inactivation center (Xic) and influenced by the X chromosome controlling element (Xce), which causes primary nonrandom X-inactivation. Other examples of nonrandom X-inactivation are also presented in this review. The definition of a major role for Xist, a noncoding RNA, in X-inactivation has enabled investigation of the mechanism leading to establishment of the heterochromatinized X-chromosome and also of the interactions between X-inactivation and imprinting as well as between X-inactivation and developmental processes in the early embryo.

DNA hypomethylation can activate Xist expression and silence X-linked genes

Xist and other X-linked gene expression was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in cells of wild type and DNA methyltranferase (Dnmt) mutant embryos and embryonic stem (ES) cells to determine whether demethylation-induced Xist expression leads to inappropriate X chromosome inactivation. In undifferentiated ES cells low-level Xist expression was detected from the single active X chromosome (Xa) in male cells and on both Xa's in female cells. Upon differentiation Xist expression was detected only in female cells, in which Xist RNA colocalized with the entire inactive X chromosome (Xi). Differentiated Dnmt mutant ES cells or cells of mutant postgastrulation embryos showed aberrant patterns of Xist expression: Xist transcripts colocalized with the single X chromosome in male cells and with both X chromosomes in female cells. X-linked gene expression was not detected from chromosomes coated with Xist RNA. These results suggest that ectopic Xist expression, induced by DNA hypomethylation, may lead to the inactivation of X-linked genes. We conclude that Xist-mediated X chromosome inactivation can occur in the absence of DNA methylation, arguing that DNA methylation may be required to repress Xist expression for the maintenance of a transcriptionally active Xa. In differentiated Dnmt mutant ES cells the activation of Xist expression correlated with a dramatic increase in apoptotic bodies, suggesting that Xist-mediated X chromosome inactivation may result in cell death and contribute to the embryonic lethality of the Dnmt mutation.

X chromosome imprinting and inactivation in the early mammalian embryo

Quantitative differences in X-linked gene expression between androgenetic (two paternal genomes), gynogenetic (two maternal genomes) and normal embryos provide clues into the roles of genomic imprinting and the X:autosome ratio in controlling X chromosome function during development. These data and many others can be accounted for by a new model of X-chromosome-inactivation (XCI). Expression of the Xist RNA from all paternal X chromosomes during development preimplantation leads to repression of genes near the X-chromosome-inactivation center (Xic). Other genes are repressed as a result of spreading of the inactivation, but only in embryos with at least two X chromosomes. XY androgenones are only deficient in expression of genes near the Xic and can form blastocysts, whereas XX androgenones completely inactivate both X chromosomes and die before the blastocyst stage. The X:autosome ratio regulates XCI solely by promoting the spread of inactivation away from the Xic on chromosomes that express Xist. Methylation of the maternal Xist gene is retained in extraembryonic tissues, so that gynogenones and parthenogenones cannot express Xist, do not undergo XCI in those tissues, and so have extraembryonic defects. This model should be relevant to understanding how aberrant X chromosome regulation might occur and how this might contribute to distortion of the X-chromosome-transmission ratio, sex ratio distortion, and disease.

Stage-specific and cell type-specific aspects of genomic imprinting effects in mammals

Recent studies have revealed that maternal and paternal alleles of some imprinted genes are differentially expressed from the earliest time of expression, with virtually no expression from one of the two alleles, while for other imprinted genes the normally silent allele can be transcribed during early development. In addition, a number of imprinted genes manifest their imprints only in select tissues. These observations indicate that the marks that denote parental chromosome origin need not directly determine allele expression, but rather bias later epigenetic modifications toward a particular allele. Thus, factors expressed at specific stages or in specific cell types are required to silence one parental allele or another. Stage-dependent and tissue-specific epigenetic modifications include the progressive establishment of the mature adult parental allele-specific DNA methylation patterns. These changes resemble and may share a common mechanistic basis with other epigenetic modifications that occur during development. Understanding the mechanisms by which these post-fertilization epigenetic modifications are mediated and regulated will be essential for understanding how genomic imprinting leads to differences in parental allele expression.

The new human genetics

This overview for the special issue of Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis devoted to recent advances in human genetics relevant to mutagenesis briefly surveys the advances in the field. We present the evidence that trinucleotide repeat expansion can cause anticipation in human inherited disease. The finding that transposons are active in humans, as they are in other organisms, is reviewed. We present an example of two different diseases being caused by mutations in one gene. The role of mitochondrial mutations and parent-specific gene origin effects ("imprinting") are briefly reviewed; fuller reviews are provided in other articles in this special issue. Finally, the relevance of epigenetic inheritance by protein-protein interaction is included.

Mechanistic and developmental aspects of genetic imprinting in mammals

Genetic imprinting in mammals allows the recognition and differential expression of maternal and paternal alleles of certain genes. Recent results from a number of laboratories indicate that, at least for some genes, gametic imprints, which must exist in order to mark chromosomes or genes as having been transmitted via sperm or ovum, are not by themselves sufficient to determine allele expression. Other postfertilization events are required, and these events are subject to both tissue-specific and developmental stage-specific regulation. Changes in imprinted gene methylation during preimplantation and fetal life indicate that the establishment of additional allele-specific modifications is likely to contribute to imprinted regulation. Disruptions in imprinting processes, loss of imprints, and loss of nonimprinted alleles through uniparental disomy are likely to contribute to a variety of developmental abnormalities and pathological conditions in both mice and humans.

CpG island promoter region methylation patterns of the inactive-X-chromosome hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) gene

Inactive-X-chromosome genes in mammalian females have methylated CpG islands. We have questioned whether there are variable levels of cytosine methylation at different CpG sites within the island that might indicate the presence of primary sites of methylation which may be critical for the maintenance of gene repression and candidate sites for the initiation of inactivation. To address these questions, we have analyzed the methylation patterns of 32 CpG sites of the X-linked hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) gene on the active and inactive X chromosomes of mouse tissues and cell lines, using genomic sequencing of bisulfite-treated genomic DNA. Cytosine is deaminated by bisulfite, but methylcytosine is not affected. Cell lines that were heterozygous for the Hprt deletion mutation (Hprtb-m3) and a functional Hprt allele were selected with 6-thioguanine. The resulting cell populations uniformly carry the intact Hprt allele on the inactive X chromosome. The methylation of these CpG sites was determined either by the direct sequence analysis of bisulfite-treated and amplified DNA or by the sequence analysis of clones derived from the amplified DNA. No CpG methylation was detected on the active Hprt genes from either males or the active X chromosome of females. On average, 22 CpGs were methylated in the other 50% of female DNA, and the level of methylation at individual sites varied from 42 to 100%. Analysis of the inactive Hprt gene in two cell lines showed that averages of 14 and 18 CpGs were methylated and that the frequency of methylation at 32 individual sites ranged from 3 to 100%. The highest frequency of methylation in cell lines coincided with the sequences flanking transcription initiation sites. These results suggest that methylation patterns are heterogeneous within a tissue and even in clonal cell populations and that specific subsets of CpG sites sustain high methylation frequencies which may be critical for the maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation. The bisulfite method identified which CpG sites were methylated on the inactive X chromosome, and it provided a quantitative estimate of the frequency of methylation of these sites in genomic DNA.

CpG island promoter region methylation patterns of the inactive-X-chromosome hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) gene

Inactive-X-chromosome genes in mammalian females have methylated CpG islands. We have questioned whether there are variable levels of cytosine methylation at different CpG sites within the island that might indicate the presence of primary sites of methylation which may be critical for the maintenance of gene repression and candidate sites for the initiation of inactivation. To address these questions, we have analyzed the methylation patterns of 32 CpG sites of the X-linked hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) gene on the active and inactive X chromosomes of mouse tissues and cell lines, using genomic sequencing of bisulfite-treated genomic DNA. Cytosine is deaminated by bisulfite, but methylcytosine is not affected. Cell lines that were heterozygous for the Hprt deletion mutation (Hprtb-m3) and a functional Hprt allele were selected with 6-thioguanine. The resulting cell populations uniformly carry the intact Hprt allele on the inactive X chromosome. The methylation of these CpG sites was determined either by the direct sequence analysis of bisulfite-treated and amplified DNA or by the sequence analysis of clones derived from the amplified DNA. No CpG methylation was detected on the active Hprt genes from either males or the active X chromosome of females. On average, 22 CpGs were methylated in the other 50% of female DNA, and the level of methylation at individual sites varied from 42 to 100%. Analysis of the inactive Hprt gene in two cell lines showed that averages of 14 and 18 CpGs were methylated and that the frequency of methylation at 32 individual sites ranged from 3 to 100%. The highest frequency of methylation in cell lines coincided with the sequences flanking transcription initiation sites. These results suggest that methylation patterns are heterogeneous within a tissue and even in clonal cell populations and that specific subsets of CpG sites sustain high methylation frequencies which may be critical for the maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation. The bisulfite method identified which CpG sites were methylated on the inactive X chromosome, and it provided a quantitative estimate of the frequency of methylation of these sites in genomic DNA.

Igf2r and Igf2 gene expression in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and parthenogenetic preimplantation mouse embryos: absence of regulation by genomic imprinting

Genomic imprinting in mammals is believed to result from modifications to chromosomes during gametogenesis that inactivate the paternal or maternal allele. The genes encoding the insulin-like growth factor type 2 (Igf2) and its receptor (Igf2r) are reciprocally imprinted and expressed from the paternal and maternal genomes, respectively, in the fetal and adult mouse. We find that both genes are expressed in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and parthenogenetic preimplantation mouse embryos. These results indicate that inactivation of imprinted genes occurs postfertilization (most likely postimplantation) and that genomic imprinting and gene inactivation are separate processes. We propose that imprinting marks the chromosome so that regulatory factors expressed in cells at later times can recognize the imprint and selectively inactivate the maternal or paternal allele. For these genes, this finding invalidates models of genomic imprinting that require them to be inactive from the time of fertilization.

Isolation of a clone partially encoding hill kangaroo X-linked hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase: sex differences in methylation in the body of the gene

An X-linked clone encoding exons 4-9 of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) gene was isolated from a kangaroo (Macropus robustus: Marsupialia) lambda EMBL4 genomic library. Sequence similarity between the kangaroo and eutherian HPRT coding sequences was high; however, intron sizes varied significantly between the kangaroo and other eutherian species. HpaII and HhaI sites in the body of the gene were generally hypermethylated in vivo on the active, relative to the inactive X, with sites within intron 3 showing essentially complete correspondence of activity with methylation and inactivity with unmethylation. At approximately 5 kb downstream from the gene, a switch to unmethylation of active X-linked sites occurred. This switch occurred within a cluster of HpaII and HhaI sites that may represent a CG island associated with a subsequent gene.

An X-linked human collagen transgene escapes X inactivation in a subset of cells

Transgenic mice carrying one complete copy of the human alpha 1(I) collagen gene on the X chromosome (HucII mice) were used to study the effect of X inactivation on transgene expression. By chromosomal in situ hybridization, the transgene was mapped to the D/E region close to the Xce locus, which is the controlling element. Quantitative RNA analyses indicated that transgene expression in homozygous and heterozygous females was about 125% and 62%, respectively, of the level found in hemizygous males. Also, females with Searle's translocation carrying the transgene on the inactive X chromosome (Xi) expressed about 18% transgene RNA when compared to hemizygous males. These results were consistent with the transgene being subject to but partially escaping from X inactivation. Two lines of evidence indicated that the transgene escaped X inactivation or was reactivated in a small subset of cells rather than being expressed at a lower level from the Xi in all cells, (i) None of nine single cell clones carrying the transgene on the Xi transcribed transgene RNA. In these clones the transgene was highly methylated in contrast to clones carrying the transgene on the Xa. (ii) In situ hybridization to RNA of cultured cells revealed that about 3% of uncloned cells with the transgene on the Xi expressed transgene RNA at a level comparable to that on the Xa. Our results indicate that the autosomal human collagen gene integrated on the mouse X chromosome is susceptible to X inactivation. Inactivation is, however, not complete as a subset of cells carrying the transgene on Xi expresses the transgene at a level comparable to that when carried on Xa.

At least two distinct epigenetic mechanisms are correlated with high-frequency "switching" for APRT phenotypic expression in mouse embryonal carcinoma stem cells

A series of clones displaying high frequency "switching" phenotypes for expression of the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (aprt) gene were previously isolated from the P19 mouse embryonal carcinoma stem cell line. Most clones contained only one aprt allele. We report here the characterization of each of these clones with regards to enzymatic activity, mRNA steady state levels, DNA methylation, and chromatin conformation. When clones were selected for resistance to the purine analog 2,6-diaminopurine, which requires markedly reduced levels of APRT enzymatic activity, two distinct classes were observed. The first class was associated with reduced or undetectable levels of aprt mRNA, hypermethylation of the 5' CpG island, and a closed chromatin conformation within this region. When clones of this class were selected for reacquisition of APRT enzymatic activity they were found to have increased mRNA levels, a hypomethylated CpG island, and an open chromatin conformation. In contrast, the second class of clones displayed wild-type levels of mRNA, CpG island hypomethylation, and an open chromatin conformation regardless of whether they were selected for the presence or absence of APRT enzymatic activity. The implications of these results for general mechanisms of epigenetic change in somatic cells and the possibility that expression of the mouse aprt gene may be developmentally regulated are discussed.

Analysis of full fragile X mutations in fetal tissues and monozygotic twins indicate that abnormal methylation and somatic heterogeneity are established early in development

The fragile X syndrome, the most common cause of inherited mental retardation, is characterized by unique genetic mechanisms, which include amplification of a CGG repeat and abnormal DNA methylation. We have proposed that 2 main types of mutations exist. Premutations do not cause mental retardation, and are characterized by an elongation of 70 to 500 bp, with little or no somatic heterogeneity and without abnormal methylation. Full mutations are associated with high risk of mental retardation, and consist of an amplification of 600 bp or more, with often extensive somatic heterogeneity, and with abnormal DNA methylation. To analyze whether the latter pattern is already established during fetal life, we have studied chorionic villi from 10 fetuses with a full mutation. In some cases we have compared them to corresponding fetal tissues. Our results indicate that somatic heterogeneity of the full mutation is established during (and possibly limited to) the very early stages of embryogenesis. This is supported by the extraordinary concordance in mutation patterns found in 2 sets of monozygotic twins (9 and 30 years old). While the methylation pattern specific of the inactive X chromosome appears rarely present on chorionic villi of normal females, the abnormal methylation characteristic of the full mutation was present in 8 of 9 male or female chorionic villi analyzed. This suggests that the methylation mechanisms responsible for establishing the inactive X chromosome pattern and the full mutation pattern are, at least in part, distinct. Our results validate the analysis of chorionic villi for direct prenatal diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome.

Demonstration of replication patterns in the last premeiotic S-phase of male Chinese hamsters after BrdU pulse labeling

Chromosome replication in the last premeiotic S-phase of male mammals has been previously studied by [3H]thymidine autoradiography and by a 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)/Giemsa technique. We used a recently developed BrdU-antibody technique (BAT) in this study. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) The replication patterns observed are similar to that of somatic cells. (2) The heterochromatin starts replication in early S-phase. (3) The euchromatic part of the X chromosome of the male Chinese hamster replicates together with the autosomes and therefore behaves isocyclicly and not allocyclicly as hitherto assumed. Hence, genetic inactivity of the X chromosome may be brought about by a mechanism different from that in somatic cells.

The X chromosome in development in mouse and man

In mammals, dosage compensation for X-linked genes between males and females is achieved by the inactivation of one of the X chromosomes in females. The inactivation event occurs early in development in all cells of the female mouse embryo and is stable and heritable in somatic cells. However, in the primordial germ cells, reactivation occurs around the time of meiosis. Owing to random inactivation in somatic cells, all female mice and humans are mosaic for X-linked gene function. Variable mosaicism can result in expression of disease in human females heterozygous for an X-linked gene defect. In the extra-embryonic lineages of female mouse embryos, and in the somatic cells of female marsupials, the paternally inherited X chromosome is preferentially inactivated. The X chromosomes in the egg and sperm must be differentially marked or imprinted, so that they are distinguished by the inactivation mechanism in these tissues. Initiation of inactivation of an entire X chromosome appears to spread from a single X-inactivation centre and may involve the recently discovered gene, XIST, which is expressed only from the inactive X chromosome. The maintenance of inactivation of certain household genes on the inactive X chromosome involves methylation of CpG islands in their 5' regions. Critical CpG sites are methylated at, or very close to, the time of inactivation in development. The mouse and the human X chromosomes carry the same genes but their arrangement is different and there are some genes in the pairing segment and elsewhere on the human X chromosome which can escape inactivation. Regions of homology between the mouse and human X chromosomes allow prediction of the map positions of homologous genes and provide mouse models of genetic disease in the human.

DNA methylation and gene expression

A large body of evidence demonstrates that DNA methylation plays a role in gene regulation in animal cells. Not only is there a correlation between gene transcription and undermethylation, but also transfection experiments clearly show that the presence of methyl moieties inhibits gene expression in vivo. Furthermore, gene activation can be induced by treatment of cells with 5-azacytidine, a potent demethylating agent. Methylation appears to influence gene expression by affecting the interactions with DNA of both chromatin proteins and specific transcription factors. Although methylation patterns are very stable in somatic cells, the early embryo is characterized by large alterations in DNA modification. New methodologies are now becoming available for studying methylation at this stage and in the germ line. During development, tissue-specific genes undergo demethylation in their tissue of expression. In tissue culture cells this process is highly specific and appears to involve an active mechanism which takes place in the absence of DNA replication. The X chromosome undergoes inactivation during development; this is accompanied by de novo methylation, which appears necessary to stably maintain its silent state. As opposed to the programmed changes in DNA methylation which occur in vivo, immortalized tissue culture cells demonstrate alterations in DNA modification which take place over a long time scale and which appear to be the result of selective pressures present during the growth of these cells in culture.

[35S]methionine interaction with rat liver tRNA and effect of chemical carcinogens

The interaction of [35S]methionine with hepatic tRNA in normal, carcinogen-treated, and partially hepatectomized rats was studied. tRNA was preferentially labeled following [35S]methionine (1.6 mCi, 25 mg/kg body wt) administration by intraperitoneal injection. The extent of [35S]methionine-tRNA interaction was impaired by partial hepatectomy and by conditions having a carcinogenic potential.

Demethylation of CpG islands in embryonic cells

DNA in differentiated somatic cells has a fixed pattern of methylation, which is faithfully copied after replication. By contrast, the methylation patterns of many tissue-specific and some housekeeping genes are altered during normal development. This modification of DNA methylation in the embryo has also been observed in transgenic mice and in transfection experiments. Here we report the fate in mice of an in vitro-methylated adenine phosphoribosyltransferase transgene. The entire 5' CpG island region became demethylated, whereas the 3' end of the gene remained modified and was even methylated de novo at additional sites. Transfection experiments in vitro show that the demethylation is rapid, is specific for embryonic cell-types and affects a variety of different CpG island sequences. This suggests that gene sequences can be recognized in the early embryo and imprinted with the correct methylation pattern through a combination of demethylation and de novo methylation.

Use of a HpaII-polymerase chain reaction assay to study DNA methylation in the Pgk-1 CpG island of mouse embryos at the time of X-chromosome inactivation

A HpaII-PCR assay was used to study DNA methylation in individual mouse embryos. It was found that HpaII site H-7 in the CpG island of the X-chromosome-linked Pgk-1 gene is less than or equal to 10% methylated in oocytes and male embryos but becomes 40% methylated in female embryos at 6.5 days; about the time of X-chromosome inactivation of the inner cell mass.

Use of a HpaII-polymerase chain reaction assay to study DNA methylation in the Pgk-1 CpG island of mouse embryos at the time of X-chromosome inactivation

A HpaII-PCR assay was used to study DNA methylation in individual mouse embryos. It was found that HpaII site H-7 in the CpG island of the X-chromosome-linked Pgk-1 gene is less than or equal to 10% methylated in oocytes and male embryos but becomes 40% methylated in female embryos at 6.5 days; about the time of X-chromosome inactivation of the inner cell mass.

High levels of de novo methylation and altered chromatin structure at CpG islands in cell lines

CpG islands are normally methylation free in cells of the animal, even when the associated gene is transcriptionally silent. In mouse NIH 3T3 and L cells, however, over half of the islands are heavily methylated. Near identity of the methylated subset in the two cell lines suggested that methylation is confined to genes that are nonessential in culture. In agreement with this, islands at several tissue-specific genes, but not at housekeeping genes, have become methylated in many human and mouse cell lines. At the chromatin level, methylated islands are Mspl resistant compared with their nonmethylated counterparts. We suggest that mutation-like gene inactivation due to CpG island methylation is widespread in many cell lines and could explain the loss of cell type-specific functions in culture.

Changes in DNA methylation during mouse embryonic development in relation to X-chromosome activity and imprinting

Changing DNA methylation patterns during embryonic development are discussed in relation to differential gene expression, changes in X-chromosome activity and genomic imprinting. Sperm DNA is more methylated than oocyte DNA, both overall and for specific sequences. The methylation difference between the gametes could be one of the mechanisms (along with chromatin structure) regulating initial differences in expression of parental alleles in early development. There is a loss of methylation during development from the morula to the blastocyst and a marked decrease in methylase activity. De novo methylation becomes apparent around the time of implantation and occurs to a lesser extent in extra-embryonic tissue DNA. In embryonic DNA, de novo methylation begins at the time of random X-chromosome inactivation but it continues to occur after X-chromosome inactivation and may be a mechanism that irreversibly fixes specific patterns of gene expression and X-chromosome inactivity in the female. The germ line is probably delineated before extensive de novo methylation and hence escapes this process. The marked undermethylation of the germ line DNA may be a prerequisite for X-chromosome reactivation. The process underlying reactivation and removal of parent-specific patterns of gene expression may be changes in chromatin configuration associated with meiosis and a general reprogramming of the germ line to developmental totipotency.

DNA methylation and cell memory

In this paper we address the question: How do replicating mammalian cells remember with high fidelity their proper state of differentiation? Several possible mechanisms for cell memory are discussed, and it is concluded that only mechanisms involving DNA methylation are supported by strong experimental evidence. This evidence is reviewed. The establishment and modulation of methylation patterns are discussed and a hemimethylation model for stem cells is presented. The overall conclusion is that, although little is yet known about the details, there should be little doubt about the existence of a methylation system functioning at least to aid cell memory.

Differential activation of the hprt gene on the inactive X chromosome in primary and transformed Chinese hamster cells

We have investigated the genetic activation of the hprt (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase) gene located on the inactive X chromosome in primary and transformed female diploid Chinese hamster cells after treatment with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine (5azaCR). Mutants deficient in HPRT were first selected by growth in 6-thioguanine from two primary fibroblast cell lines and from transformed lines derived from them. These HPRT- mutants were then treated with 5azaCR and plated in HAT (hypoxanthine-methotrexate-thymidine) medium to select for cells that had reexpressed the hprt gene on the inactive X chromosome. Contrary to previous results with primary human cells, 5azaCR was effective in activating the hprt gene in primary Chinese hamster fibroblasts at a low but reproducible frequency of 2 x 10(-6) to 7 x 10(-6). In comparison, the frequency in independently derived transformed lines varied from 1 x 10(-5) to 5 x 10(-3), consistently higher than in the nontransformed cells. This increase remained significant when the difference in growth rates between the primary and transformed lines was taken into account. Treatment with 5azaCR was also found to induce transformation in the primary cell lines but at a low frequency of 4 x 10(-7) to 8 x 10(-7), inconsistent with a two-step model of transformation followed by gene activation to explain the derepression of hprt in primary cells. Thus, these results indicate that upon transformation, the hprt gene on the inactive Chinese hamster X chromosome is rendered more susceptible to action by 5azaCR, consistent with a generalized DNA demethylation associated with the transformation event or with an increase in the instability of an underlying primary mechanism of X inactivation.